Re: IDE head scratcher

2003-01-17 Thread Justin Zygmont
i've had a lot of little things like that happen with diferent drives in 
different computers..


On Fri, 17 Jan 2003, Michael Weber wrote:

> I have an old P-233 I'm turning into a firewall.  I blew a fresh install
> of RH8 onto the drive, installed everything, and had it running.  I then
> needed to run a hardware diagnostic on an IBM hard drive that had failed
> in another system.  Since this one was not in production, had the cover
> off and was handy, I unplugged all the IDE devices, plugged in the IBM
> hard drive and booted from the IBM diag floppy.
> 
> The machine BIOS was too old to see a 60 Gb drive, so the diag program
> failed.  
> 
> Anyway, I plugged my CDROM and HD back in and tried to boot.  The GRUB
> loader booted Linux and it began its thing, up until it loaded the IDE
> drivers.  As soon as it touched the hard drive, the system locked hard. 
> I unplugged, reseated and re-checked everything that could be.  No go. 
> It reid booting from the install CD, it got to the same place and died. 
> It did the same thing for any boot mode.
> 
> I unplugged the HD, and I could boot from the CDROM, so that worked
> fine.  I plugged the CDROM into the HD cable, ran fine.  I plugged the
> HD into the CDROM cable, and it booted!  I plugged the HD back into the
> primary cable and the CD back into the secondary cable, and it hangs at
> the same place.
> 
> Any idea why this hard drive refuses to be a primary master and run
> fine as a secondary master?
> 
> Head-scratchin-in-KC
> 
> All spam should be directed to my other account:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 
> 



-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list



Re: LPD?

2003-01-20 Thread Justin Zygmont
set it up as a local printer and test if from linux, if i won't print from 
there, then it's not windows or network related.


On Mon, 20 Jan 2003, Chris Sechiatano wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> I'm trying to set up lpd on RH8 so I can use it as a print server for windows
> clients.  I chose the RAW driver, but the problems seems that the job never
> gets to the queue.  lpq shows no print jobs.
> 
> I have the firewall turned off and my windows clients are configured to use
> lpr printing.
> 
> Any thoughts?
> 
> Thanks
> 
> 



-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list



Re: telnet

2003-01-26 Thread Justin Zygmont
are you logging in a root?  this is blocked from /etc/securetty


On Sun, 26 Jan 2003, Wayne Seth wrote:

> I am trying to use telnet.  I have two RH 8.0 computers, both of
> which have Disabled = no in the /etc/xinetd.d/telnet file.  I can
> connect easily but when I try to login, I get a "Login incorrect"
> message after I give the password.  Is there some type of user
> list for telnet I'm missing?
> 
> Wayne Seth
> Project Manager
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 
> 



-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list



Re: Samba printing fails

2003-01-28 Thread Justin Zygmont
> I can connect to the share from another Linux box using smbclient

can you print from it though?  did you try restarting smb or network, and 
the win machine?




-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list



Re: Recompiling OpenLDAP for use with Netmeeting

2003-01-29 Thread Justin Zygmont
>  /sbin/service slapd start|stop  still work?

take a look at the script for it in /etc/rc.d.inet.d and see if there is a 
path that you would have to change to get it to find slapd.  it should 
work.




-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list



Re: Password change script

2003-01-31 Thread Justin Zygmont
> linux machines yet to require one (only 7 linux servers).

that's enough.  openldap is an option also.




-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list



Re: Battery on Laptop

2003-02-04 Thread Justin Zygmont
it should be worth noting that this would only apply to older batteries 
(NiCAD)


On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, Rigoberto de la Cruz wrote:

> Batteries get old... the best thing to keep them in
> shape is to let the batteries run out and then do a
> complete recharge.. also, using the an adapter when
> the battery is full is bad... the batteries are
> supposed to have a "memmory."  you can find more in
> some web sites and even in some laptop manuals. so to
> keep it simple just do the following:
> 
> -never use an adaptor (adapter?) while you have a full
> battery.
> -only use an adaptor when your battery is a little bit
> less than 50% and when the battery is full, disconnect
> the adaptor.
> - once in a while, let the battery run out, then do a
> full recharge
> 
> 
> 
> rigo
> 
> --- Dave Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tuesday 04 February 2003 15:13, cc-admin wrote:
> > > www.linux-laptops.net is a good place to start.
> > Look for your model, 
> > make
> > > etc.
> > > - Original Message -
> > > From: "Patrick Marquetecken"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: "Psyche redhat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 11:59 AM
> > > Subject: Battery on Laptop
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I'm having trouble to work with my laptop, in
> > windows i can work for
> > > > about 3 hours on battery but in Linux 1,5 hours.
> > > > Are there some sugertions to work longer with
> > the battery.
> > > >
> > > > Patrick
> > 
> > 
> > My battery used to last about 3 hours in Linux but
> > now it's in the
> > 1-1.5 hour range. I wonder if it's the battery not
> > holding a charge as
> > well now that it's 2 years old or if the fact that
> > the ext3 journaling
> > file system writes to the disk every 5 seconds. Can
> > anyone comment on
> > that?
> > 
> > Dave
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > Psyche-list mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
> 
> 
> 
> 



-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list



Re: Screen Command

2003-02-05 Thread Justin Zygmont
why can't you just open another telnet session, at least if you hang the 
one you're on, it would freeze the same screen session that is doing the 
compile.


On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, Ross Ferson wrote:

> i got it !  I just have to remember to put screen in first!  that is
> awesome!  thanks a lot!
> 
> Ross
> 
> PS: Now i don't know how i ever lived with out the wonderful, magical,
> SCREEN!  :)
> - Original Message -
> From: "Peter Larsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 1:12 PM
> Subject: Re: Screen Command
> 
> 
> > Ross Ferson wrote:
> > > OK not to be a pain but this is going to be a long compile, so i want
> > > to get this right :)
> >
> > Ok :)
> >
> > > Putty (ssh to box.com) to box and start compile (make install)
> > > stuff is going all over screen (make installing ), how do i let it
> > > keep going and detach to pick up later?
> >
> > While the compile is ongoing, hit ctrl-a+d
> > The compile continues in the background (check with top or vmstat to be
> > sure).
> > Close session.
> >
> > > after that when i get home to the host box, i open up terminal and
> > > get: #
> > > i type screen -rd ?
> >
> > Yes - that brings you back into the session to where it has now reached.
> > You can scroll within screen too - ctrl-a+] enables "copy/paste" buffer,
> > which will allow you to use your arrow/page up/down to browse back in
> > process history.
> >
> > I've used screen on some boxes to run setiathome - and it works great :)
> I
> > have the char-gui running, so I can see the progress, and when I resume
> > screen it's easy to see how far the calculations are going.
> >
> > > I guess where i am not getting it is using putty do i use the screen
> > > command BEFORE i start entering the commands?
> >
> > Putty is your emulator. You use it to get your connection to your box.
> Once
> > logged on, and you have your $ prompt, screen is just a command like any
> > other. Screen only saves what you run within it's environement, so as long
> > as you remember to start your compile within screen, the rest is rather
> > logical.
> >
> > Best Regards
> >   Peter Larsen
> >
> > > - Original Message -
> > > From: "Peter Larsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 12:03 PM
> > > Subject: Re: Screen Command
> > >
> > >
> > >> Ross Ferson wrote:
> > >>> Ok,
> > >>>
> > >>> maybe i should have been more clear.  I am running win2k at work
> > >>> (not my choice) and i use putty to ssh to my home box.  how does
> > >>> that change things?
> > >>
> > >> Not at all - it is actually almost the setup I use too - work laptop
> > >> is W2K and I use putty to get to all our server boxes. At work I use
> > >> my Linux workstation for many tasks, and I use screen to get back to
> > >> those (when needed). But most of all, I use screen to avoid having
> > >> to make multiple terminals to one host. ctrl-a+c creates a new
> > >> session so much faster, and it's very easy to toggle between the
> > >> sessions - and I end up with one large window, easier to manage.
> > >> That screen allows me to resume previously attached sessions
> > >> elsewhere (or even currently attached sessions - hence the -d
> > >> parameter, detach) is a big plus.
> > >>
> > >> You'll use putty to connect to your box as usual - using ssh or
> > >> telnet - it doesn't matter. Once logged on, you resume your screen
> > >> session using 'screen -rd' (or just screen -r but I've found that it
> > >> doesn't always work without the -d). When you want to leave
> > >> the session, but not kill it, you do a ctrl-a+d, and then log out as
> > >> normal.
> > >>
> > >> This is the same procedure, regardless how you got to the box - from
> > >> xterm, ssh or putty.
> > >>
> > >>> Thanks a lot for your time.
> > >>
> > >> You're welcome :)
> > >> Glad to be able to help.
> > >>
> > >> Regards
> > >>   Peter Larsen
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Psyche-list mailing list
> > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Psyche-list mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 



-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list



Re: GRUB and 3Ware

2003-02-08 Thread Justin Zygmont
maybe try installing grub manually, info grub has the section of this.  
Just type:

grub

then it's the next 3 commands, something like this:

root (hdx,x)
find /boot/stage2
can't remember the last one off hand


On Sat, 8 Feb 2003, Ron Lee wrote:

> I installed RH8.0 on a system using a 3Ware 7500-8 card. The install went well 
> except for the bootloader. I choose GRUB like I have for other systems. This 
> is the first time I chose GRUB on a 3Ware system. When I reboot, the system 
> just hangs. I can boot from the boot floppy that I created without any 
> problem. I can also boot from a GRUB floppy that I created with grub-install 
> /dev/fd0. When I try to install GRUB to the Master boot sector of the hard 
> drive array with grub-install /dev/sda, I get an error: 
> Error 24: Attempt to access block outside partition
> Now if I install the OS and choose LILO as the boot loader, it boots from the 
> hard disk array without any problem at all. I find this most curious as GRUB 
> is supposed to be more flexible as well as less prone to issues that LILO 
> suffers from. Any info would be greatly appreciated. 
> 
> 
> 
> 



-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list



Re: Mozilla or Netscape?

2003-02-10 Thread Justin Zygmont
I found mozilla to be more sluggish that netscape 4.x.  Otherwise mozilla 
would be a great choice.


On 10 Feb 2003, Ilona wrote:

> I'm a newbie to Linux and was wondering what people prefered and
> advantages disadvantges to Netscape and Mozilla and if mozilla wich
> version to use 1.0.2 or 1.2?  From what I could see it seemed that they
> had two separate numbering schemes going so i couldn't figure out the
> most recent one.  I know how to install rpms so if the installation
> method is diffent it needs to be well documented so I can figure it
> out.  So far in my linux experience I have had NO luck w/ source code. 
> Any recommendations or considerations would be appreciated.  
> Thanx
> Ilona
> 
> 
> 
> 



-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list



Re: OT: the whole SCO IP patent(s) mess

2003-02-13 Thread Justin Zygmont
> Keith, there is no product to buy, essentially. This is the action of a
> company in its death throes that owns some IP and was bought by lawyers.
> They are trying to milk the assets for anything they can get before the
> entire company is defunct.

do you know if this is really true, is Caldera (SCO) really doing that 
bad?
 



-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list



Re: GRUB problems

2003-02-13 Thread Justin Zygmont
On Thu, 13 Feb 2003, Thomas Dodd wrote:

> 
> 
> Nick Urbanik wrote:
> 
> >Justin Zygmont wrote:
> >
> >  
> >
> >>It doesn't list the error I am getting.  Now matter what I do it keeps
> >>saying:  /dev/md0 does not have a corresponding BIOS drive
> >>Any help would be greatly appreciated.
> >>
> Is /boot on  /dev/md0 ?
> 
> What raid_level is /dev/md0?
> ( check /proc/mdstat )

no, it would only be on /dev/hda and hdc in my case.  This was for a RAID 
1 mirror.  Nick's solution will work if you can get a grub command line, 
if not, just get into single mode and install grub onto both drives the  
seperately to ensure each one would be bootable in the event of a failure.  
Also /boot does not actually have to be on a seperate partition.  
I found out this from hours of trial and error:)




-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list



Re: GRUB problems

2003-02-14 Thread Justin Zygmont
> This discussing reminded me that I never seup grup to boot the other 
> half of the mirror, so I don't have the redundancy I thought I had. Time 
> to fix that too. I image it'll be tricky, since I have to install stage1 
> on /dev/hdc and configure it to find hdc1 when booted from hdc. I really 
> hate the PC BIOS. I'd much prefer somthing like the Sparc boot prom. :)

it was pretty easy, just boot the system up, type grub, then the commands 
from the last message, and it will write it to the hdc or whatever the 
other drive is.




-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list



Re: GRUB problems

2003-02-14 Thread Justin Zygmont
On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, Thomas Dodd wrote:

> 
> 
> Justin Zygmont wrote:
> 
> >>This discussing reminded me that I never seup grup to boot the other 
> >>half of the mirror, so I don't have the redundancy I thought I had. Time 
> >>to fix that too. I image it'll be tricky, since I have to install stage1 
> >>on /dev/hdc and configure it to find hdc1 when booted from hdc. I really 
> >>hate the PC BIOS. I'd much prefer somthing like the Sparc boot prom. :)
> >>
> >>
> >
> >it was pretty easy, just boot the system up, type grub, then the commands 
> >from the last message, and it will write it to the hdc or whatever the 
> >other drive is.
> >
> Have you disconnected hda to verify it worked?

yes, and they both boot up interchangably and that's with a triple boot 
system too.  After typing grub from the command line as root the rest was 
as follows:

root (hd0,0)
find /boot/grub/stage1
setup (hd0)

of course the 0,0 being the drive that would want to install or reinstall 
grub on.




-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list



iptables

2003-02-14 Thread Justin Zygmont
does anyone have a basic ip masquerading script that they use in 
/etc/sysconfig/iptables.  It cannot set ip forwarding from there.




-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list



Re: LDAP

2003-02-19 Thread Justin Zygmont
docs for ldap are a bit scattered, you'll have to find out how to change 
the authentication type on the unix clients.


On Wed, 19 Feb 2003, Eduardo Sanz Martin wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I would like to set up a LDAP server as authentication password ( like a
> NIS). I would like to set up this server on a linux machine. It is going
> to
> validate passwords on UNIX (HP-UX, SGI) and linux, is it possible? How
> can i find information about this item. I checked LDAP HOWTO, but it
> is not clear. Is there a document that explains clear how LDAP works?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Eduardo Sanz
> 
> 
> 
> 



-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list



Re: LDAP

2003-02-19 Thread Justin Zygmont
> IMHO LDAP is not for the faint of heart. Once it is working it is pretty
> much bullet proof but it is painful to get working 100%. IMHO the docs
> still pretty much suck. At least the ones I have read.

and it's a lot slower too




-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list



Re: LDAP

2003-02-19 Thread Justin Zygmont
I don't understand.  You said that it was the clients that you were 
looking to have authenticate to the server?  If they were redhat linux, 
you would just have to set authentication to "ldap" in "setup" or 
"authconfig"


On Wed, 19 Feb 2003, Eduardo Sanz Martin wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> Which method can I use to set up one server as a single-solution
> authentication for Unix and linux system?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Eduardo
> 
> Justin Zygmont escribió:
> 
> > docs for ldap are a bit scattered, you'll have to find out how to change
> > the authentication type on the unix clients.
> >
> > On Wed, 19 Feb 2003, Eduardo Sanz Martin wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I would like to set up a LDAP server as authentication password ( like a
> > > NIS). I would like to set up this server on a linux machine. It is going
> > > to
> > > validate passwords on UNIX (HP-UX, SGI) and linux, is it possible? How
> > > can i find information about this item. I checked LDAP HOWTO, but it
> > > is not clear. Is there a document that explains clear how LDAP works?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Eduardo Sanz
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> 



-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list



raid card performance

2003-02-24 Thread Justin Zygmont
someone was asking about the differences between raid cards?  This link 
had info and benchmarks in case anyone would want to see.

http://tech-report.com/reviews/2002q4/ideraid/index.x?pg=17





-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list


Re: Ext3 File System Check

2003-03-08 Thread Justin Zygmont
> Interesting, jdow, but I rather saw him, and now you, as a bother. 
> Kindly never write me here again or I'll contact the list manager.
> 
> John Lowell

hi,

you're not on dope or anything like that are you, urm, if I may ask.




-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list


Re: Recent Kernel problems

2003-03-09 Thread Justin Zygmont
can you be certail that you installed the right kernel and installed it 
with rpm -Uvh kernel* it's always worked cleanly for me.


On Sun, 9 Mar 2003, Mike Watson wrote:

> I have an AMD Duron, 800MHz clone box running RH 8 with all the errata 
> except for one.  I cannot load the most recent kernel upgrades since 
> 2.4.18-19.8.0.  There have been two kernel releases since that version 
> and I have the same problem with both.
> 
> When loading the system, when /proc is mounted an error occurs and 
> triggers entry into manual mode to run fsck.  None of the previous 
> kernel do this and I have not had any power loses that would force an 
> fsck on rebooting.  I removed the previous version of the kernel when 
> this occured and now it also does it for 2.4.18-26.8.0.
> 
> After the previous kernel failed, this same system will now not reboot.  
> I always have to power off or hit the reset button.  I cannot find any 
> reason for this. I've reloaded the BIOS and reloaded grub without 
> change.  Anyone have any idea what's going on?  Any way to fix?
> 
> I've not had any problems outside of this.  When I first built this box, 
> I loaded the entire set software from a boxed set.
> 
> Mike W
> 



-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list


Re: Ext3 vs Ext2

2003-03-10 Thread Justin Zygmont
I never noticed any difference.  Try adding data=writeback to the 
appropriate place in the fstab and see if that helps...



On Mon, 10 Mar 2003, JD wrote:

> Hallo list,
> I have a "feeling" that ext3 is much slower than ext2. My hadrdrive 
> blinks more often after I let RH8 formatted it with its favorite ext3; 
> not to mention the noise from the harddrive rotation.
> As I said, it's just a "feeling" so please don't flame me for feeling it.
> Am I justified anyway? Is it true that ext3 fs is somehow inferior in 
> practice that ext2?
> JD
> 
> 
> 
> 



-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list


Re: Ext3 vs Ext2

2003-03-11 Thread Justin Zygmont
> ext2 distro on there now.  Honestly, I can't really tell a difference 
> between ext2 and ext3, but my laptop is fairly new (2 Ghz P4).  I like 
> having the extra protection of ext3/reiserfs.

and I have a fairly slow computer (p-200) and I can't even tell the 
difference.  There should be very few reasons to use ext2 now.




-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list


Re: Ext3 vs Ext2

2003-03-12 Thread Justin Zygmont
you might have to make a new initrd and set grub to point to that.


On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Margaret_Doll wrote:

> I am missing something with the data=writeback option in /etc/fstab
> I put that in place of the "defaults" for the system disk partitions 
> and now
> only / gets mounted and it is in a read-only mode.
> 
> On Monday, March 10, 2003, at 10:58  PM, Justin Zygmont wrote:
> 
> > I never noticed any difference.  Try adding data=writeback to the
> > appropriate place in the fstab and see if that helps...
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 10 Mar 2003, JD wrote:
> >
> >> Hallo list,
> >> I have a "feeling" that ext3 is much slower than ext2. My hadrdrive
> >> blinks more often after I let RH8 formatted it with its favorite ext3;
> >> not to mention the noise from the harddrive rotation.
> >> As I said, it's just a "feeling" so please don't flame me for feeling 
> >> it.
> >> Am I justified anyway? Is it true that ext3 fs is somehow inferior in
> >> practice that ext2?
> >> JD
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > -- 
> > Psyche-list mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 



-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list


Re: Default Nic?

2003-03-14 Thread Justin Zygmont
I don't think so, you have to give more information, especially your 
ifconfig output, does the fiber nic (whatever sevice it is) ever work?


On Fri, 14 Mar 2003, will mendez wrote:

> Hello All,
> 
> I have 2 Nics on my server eth0 is ethernet and eth1 is fiber. Does eth0
> always set itself as the default?  When both are active I can not get an
> internet connection. If I disable the fiber nic then all is well.
> 
> Thanks!
> Will Mendez
> Toaster[2]
> Mmmm...XSI
> www.xsibase.com
> www.xsimontreal.com
> 
> 
> 
> 



-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list


Re: Restricting SSH users on Server?

2003-03-19 Thread Justin Zygmont
On 20 Mar 2003, Piero Calucci wrote:

> On Thu, 2003-03-20 at 02:51, Dan G wrote:
> > How can I restrict which users have SSH access to a server? I did not
> > see any settings in sshd_config. Does this have to be done with Pam? If
> > so what files/settings are used?
> 
> in sshd_config you can use AllowGroups, AllowUsers, DenyGroups &
> DenyUsers. See sshd_config(5) 

do you know if this can be used to root jail them?




-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list


Re: ptrace/kernel

2003-03-20 Thread Justin Zygmont
just go to a mirror site and download the new ernel package, then type rpm 
-Uvh packagename and reboot.  This vulnerability sounds like it would be 
hard to exploit.


On Thu, 20 Mar 2003, anthony baldwin wrote:

> I'm guessing everyone knows about the ptrace vulnerability.
> http://news.zdnet.co.uk/story/0,,t278-s2132228,00.html
> I haven't the slightest idea what to do with this.
> I went to the RH page and there are  numerous patches and things available for 
> download but no instructions for their implementation.  
> https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2003-098.html?tag=nl
> Am I to download everything for i386, i586, i686 and install it?  
> Does installing kernel patches entail anything more complex than using rpm?
> 
> My cpu is a Pentium 3 1ghz.
> 
> I have never fiddled with the kernel and am a relative newbie, 
> having been a linux user for only a year now, 
> and an English teacher, not a trained computer expert.
> 
> Your assistance is appreciated.
> 
> tony
> 
> http://www.School-Library.net
> Freedom to Learn!
> 
> -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
> GED$/L/P/FA d? s: a C++ L++ W++ N++ K- w--- M+ PS++
> PE-- Y+ PGP- t+ tv-- b++(b) D? G e h++ r--- y?
> --END GEEK CODE BLOCK--
> 
> 
> _
> School-Library.net
> Freedom to Learn!
> 
> _
> Select your own custom email address for FREE! Get [EMAIL PROTECTED] w/No Ads, 6MB, 
> POP & more! http://www.everyone.net/selectmail?campaign=tag
> 
> 
> 
> 



-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list


SRC rpms

2003-03-20 Thread Justin Zygmont
Does anyone know the command to rebuild an SRC rpm with a new 
configure option?  




-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list


Re: Spam ?

2003-03-24 Thread Justin Zygmont

I'll bet that was to undercut SuSE :)




-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list


Re: [psyche] Re: Red Hat 9

2003-03-25 Thread Justin Zygmont
we'll see very soon, at the end of the month 6.2 and 7.0 will expire.  I'm 
curious if there will be any package updates, but I somehow doubt there 
will.


On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Jesse Keating wrote:

> On Tuesday 25 March 2003 16:22, Gerald Henriksen wrote:
> > It just won't be provided after 12 months.
> 
> Wrong.  popular releases will be supported for longer, releases such as 6.2 or 
> maybe even 7.3.  If you read the fine print, it's "at least 12 months" not 
> "at the most 12 months".  Seems to me that people are getting really worked 
> up over a whole lot of sillyness.
> 
> 



-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list


Re: Best way to update to RH9 from 8.0 ?

2003-03-25 Thread Justin Zygmont
> Obviously no one outside of Red Hat can speak fron actual experience in 
> updateing to 9. Having said that I can tell you that my experience upgrading
> from various versions to the latest and greatest version have for the most
> part been very successful. Based on my personal experience I have no problem
> doing upgrades. 

I have.  Expect breakage.  



-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list


Re: Crack for MD5 Passwords?

2003-03-25 Thread Justin Zygmont
yes, it will do all types..


On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Aaron Konstam wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 02:11:15PM -0500, John Kodis wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 04:26:44PM -0600, Ronald W. Heiby wrote:
> > 
> > > Does anyone know where I can find a copy of Crack that runs on RH
> > > 8.0 and deals with MD5 passwords?
> > 
> > Crack doesn't seem to be well maintained these days.  You might try a
> > program called "john the ripper", which handles md5 hashes and will
> > build successfully with minimal effort.
> > 
> > -- 
> > John KodisGoddard Space Flight Center
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Greenbelt, Maryland, USA
> > Phone: 301-286-7376 Fax: 301-286-1771
> 



-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list


Re: Sendmail running but not accepting

2003-03-26 Thread Justin Zygmont
sounds like your /etc/mail/sendmail.cf got replaced during the upgrade for 
some reason, you might want to check it out.


On Wed, 26 Mar 2003, Thomas Chamtieh wrote:

> 
> I just ran up2date on a newly installed system. All the updates installed
> without any erros except one thing. Sendmail was running perfect and
> accepting emails without any problems. After the update, sendmail is
> running fine, but it refuses any connection from anywhere!!
> 
> Any ideas?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> -Thomas
> 
> 
> 
> 



-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list


Re: RHN Network

2003-03-31 Thread Justin Zygmont
it hasn't even been released yet and there are updates for it already:) 
they released a sendmail upgrade today, and probably the last update ever 
for 6.2.


On Mon, 31 Mar 2003, Ed Wilts wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 07:51:41AM -0800, Marcie Laux wrote:
> > Has anyone been able to log in to start the 9.0 ISO downloads?
> 
> My transfers started but have since timed out.  The RHN is performing so
> badly I can't even get see if Red Hat has released a sendmail patch yet.
> 
> 



-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list


Re: i386 kernel not included?

2002-10-20 Thread Justin Zygmont
they don;t have the kind of resources that MS has either though..


On Sun, 20 Oct 2002, Andrew Smith wrote:

> > On 19 Oct 2002, Jean Francois Martinez wrote:
> > 
> >>I cannot say I am happy about that.
> >>
> >>The Cyrix 686 (who reached 200 Megahertz in P-rating) is certainly more
> >>powerful than a P75.  But it will NOT work with a kernel compiled for
> >>Pentium.
> > 
> > You must be as high as me, in order to ride Psyche
> > ^ Pentium
> > |
> > |
> > |  ^Cyrix 6x86
> > |  |
> > |  |
> > |  |
> > --
> > 
> > 
> >>The AMD K6 will work with a Pentium kernel but there are fair chances
> >>for it being slower with a Pentium kernel than with a 386 one (it will
> >>be slower on the C parts).
> > 
> > Compile your own (unsupported) kernel then.  We haven't supported 
> > Anything lower than Pentium for over a year and a half.  Anything 
> > lower than Pentium that worked, worked by coincidence, and not 
> > because it was officially supported.
> > 
> > Time to upgrade your hardware, stay at an older release of the 
> > distro, recompile your own kernel, or possibly even switch to a 
> > distro that offers support out of the box for ancient hardware.
> > 
> > And yes, I have several boxes which are less than the lowest 
> > system requirements.  It's trivial to make the distro run on 
> > unsupported hardware, it just takes a bit of ingenuity.  And 
> > it is unsupported.  But I don't mind.   ;o)
> > 
> > -- 
> > Mike A. Harris  ftp://people.redhat.com/mharris
> 
> Well - having thought about it a bit more ...
> 
> Removing one 12Mb RPM is quite rediculous when almost EVERY other
> intel RPM is built for an i386. Even glibc has an i386 version.
> If you say that you no longer support i386 - then build all the
> RPM's to i586 and be done with it. If every RPM was at least i586
> then all intel machines would run a ilttle bit faster.
> The argument has been stated before that the majority of performance
> gain is in using the kernel and glibc that matches your processor -
> and that all the rest is more effort than worth the gain.
> However, if they all were already i586 then the effort would be zero
> to anyone installing to have all to be at least i586
> 
> Secondly, there is no such thing as a height measurement that puts
> the lowest pentium above the highest Cyrix 6x86.
> 
> I can think of a lot of reasons why the i386 kernel was not there -
> but maybe one would be that general RedHat support for older hardware
> is not as good as MS (RedHat seems to sometimes drop support for old
> hardware that was supported in the previous release)
> Yet - RedHat's only true market is support (as stated on the web page
> about trademarks) - interesting :-)
> 
> 







Re: i386 kernel not included?

2002-10-20 Thread Justin Zygmont
> 
> And now - is anybody able to recommend me how to install Red Hat 
> Linux 8.0 on i486 boxes?
> 
> Best Regards,

try to install it on a newer computer andthen upgrade the kernel to the 
i386 one, then pop the drive in the 486.  You'll have to play around to 
tweak it a bit but you should be able to find a way, and then have 8.0 on 
everything.









Re: RHL8.0 and Windows 2000 server edition

2002-10-21 Thread Justin Zygmont
depends on what type of connectivity you want, samba wight be what you are 
looking for.


On Sun, 20 Oct 2002, Marcio Alejandro Regalado M. wrote:

> Hi there.
> 
> Can anybody give me instructions on conecting my linux box to a windows 2000 
> server edition machine??
> 
> Red Hat Newbie
> 
> _
> Charla con tus amigos en línea mediante MSN Messenger: 
> http://messenger.microsoft.com/es
> 
> 
> 
> 







Re: i386 kernel not included?

2002-10-21 Thread Justin Zygmont
I just tried it, looks neat.  that's a cute name too:)


On Sun, 20 Oct 2002, Michael Fratoni wrote:

> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On Sunday 20 October 2002 09:09 am, Petr Soucek wrote:
> 
> > Yes, I have the same opinion. And surprisingly, there *is* new i386
> > kernel for Red Hat Linux:
> > ftp://updates.redhat.com/8.0/en/os/i386/kernel-2.4.18-17.8.0.i386.rpm
> >
> > Unfortunately there is no i386 kernel on the installation disks.
> 
> [snip]
> 
> > And now - is anybody able to recommend me how to install Red Hat
> > Linux 8.0 on i486 boxes?
> 
> The RULE projects 'slinky' installer should work for these machines. It's 
> a script that installs a very basic set of packages, but should get the 
> machine up and running. Due to the missing i386 kernel, it is currently 
> installing the kernel-BOOT package. Once the install completes, you can 
> upgrade to the new i386 kernel package. (with a little work, you can do 
> this during the install as well.)
> 
> http://www.tuxfan.homeip.net:8080/rule/slinky/slinky-v0.3.1/
> 
> The script installs base packages by default, and allows you to choose 
> several other package groups. Currently, only the network subgroup has 
> been tested. The others, due to changes in the 8.0 release, are likely to 
> have unsatisfied dependencies. (which can be resolved manually.) All the 
> package groups should be tested and updated over the next few days.
> 
> There is a mailing list for the project at:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> If you decide to go this route, we would appreciate install reports and 
> feedback.
> 
> Hope that helps,
> - -- 
> - -Michael
> 
> pgp key:  http://www.tuxfan.homeip.net:8080/gpgkey.txt
> Red Hat Linux 7.{2,3}|8.0 in 8M of RAM: http://www.rule-project.org/
> - --
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
> 
> iD8DBQE9sr6qn/07WoAb/SsRArhJAJ9ZXronDCxzsKfm6h8RI4loFh0fQQCcCy1c
> wflNMqMDLZegYjLpUJ1tErg=
> =yZu7
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
> 
> 
> 
> 







Re: i386 kernel not included?

2002-10-22 Thread Justin Zygmont
> people who would actually try to install Red Hat Linux 8.0 on a 
> real 80386 class machine, I can probably count on one hand, and 

haha, I must be one of them (just kidding) I knoew previous released did 
in fact work ok, it would take like 8 hours or more to compile the 
kernel..







Re: bash basics

2002-10-23 Thread Justin Zygmont
On 23 Oct 2002, H M Kunzmann wrote:

> I have the following two scripts (below) that I've gotten a bit confused
> with.
> 
> What I want to do is dump a daily log of the router ip accounting into a
> text file for that day.
> 
> The bash script 'runlog' runs the expect scripts 'commands'.
> 
> If I run '#expect commands' I get the output I want.
> If I run 'runlog' the process runs through once and then stop
> responding, and doesn't iterate.
> 
> I ended up writing the runlog script because a cron job for 'expect
> commands >> logfile' did not run, but did create the file.
> 
> I'm a bit lost and a nudge in the right direction would be greatly
> appreciated.
> 
> 
> #!/bin/bash
> 
> today=/logs/$(date +%Y-%m-%d)$1.log

this should be in double quotes ""
 
> #echo Starting Router log...
> expect -f /root/commands >> $today
> 
> echo Completed router log for $today. Sleeping for 10 minutes.
> sleep 10m
> exec /root/runlog

using exec may not be suitable, are you sure you can't just run the 
program directly without exec?
 
> 
> #!/usr/bin/expect -f
> spawn telnet xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
> 
> send "xx\r"
> send "en\r"
> send "xx\r"
> wait -nowait
> 
> send "term len 0\r"
> send "sh ip accou\r"
> wait -nowait
> 
> send "clear ip acco\r"
> wait -nowait
> 
> send "exit\r"
> interact
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 







RE: i386 kernel not included?

2002-11-05 Thread Justin Zygmont
do you know if the gains are from less memory being taken up or actually 
from less junk compiled in the OS?



On 5 Nov 2002, Jean Francois Martinez wrote:

> On Mon, 2002-11-04 at 19:21, Lucas Albers wrote:
> > Use the stock kernel.
> > I'd like to see some benchmarks that show recompiling the kernel is
> > worthwhile for desktops, (Servers have other issues.)
> > 
> > User:Hey sysadmin this kernel is 5% faster, but it locks up every 2
> > weeks.
> > Come and fix it
> 
> 
> I wrote a numerical analysis who was published in february 1999 and
> basically you don't gain 5%.  It is closer to 1.5% to 2.5% and this 
> when you are running kernel code (when you are running user mode code
> it is unaffected).   And since 2002 machines are much bigger than the
> 32 meg box I used as an example the memory savings brought by a kernel
> compile are still more irrelevant  
> 
> 
> > 
> > I'd rather just have a kernel that works, computers are disk-bound
> > anyways, recompiling with a few extra optimizations just isn't
> > worthwhile.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > > --Luke
> > > --Computer Science Sysadmin, MSU Bozeman 
> > > --admin(AT)cs.montana.edu 994-3931 
> > 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:psyche-list-admin@;redhat.com]
> > > On Behalf Of Jakub Jelinek
> > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:36 PM
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: Re: i386 kernel not included?
> > > 
> > > On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 11:51:46AM -0500, Thomas Dodd wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Thomas Dodd wrote:
> > > > > But if most pre i686 CPUS (pre PPro/PII/Athlon) run the i386 code
> > > > > mix faster than the pentium mix, why not supply the i386 mix.
> > > > > I woul thing there are more 486s, P/MMX, K5, K6, and Cyrix CPUs
> > > > > still in use than Pentiums (pre MMX).
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > A test using a simple C source file:
> > > >
> > > > -march=i386 -mcpu=i586  and -march=i586 -mcpu=i586
> > > > were the same.
> > > >
> > > > -march=i386 -mcpu=i586  and -march=i386 -mcpu=i686
> > > > had a lot of differences. The instruction mix was very different.
> > > >
> > > > -march=i386 -mcpu=i586  and  -march=i386 -mcpu=athlon
> > > > Very different to.
> > > >
> > > > -march=i386 -mcpu=i686  was the same as -march=i386 -mcpu=athlon
> > > > Most interesting to me,
> > > > The mix is different.
> > > >
> > > > example
> > > > i686  athlon
> > > > movl -24(%edp), %edx  andl -24(%edp), %eax
> > > > andl %edx, %eax
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > movl %eax, %edx   imull $100, %eax, %edx
> > > > movl %edx, %eax
> > > > sall $2, %eax
> > > > addl %edx, %eax
> > > > leal 0(,%eax,4), %edx
> > > > addl %edx, %eax
> > > > leal 0(,%eax,4), %edx
> > > 
> > > Do you have testcase and exact options for this?
> > > $edx = 100*$eax is with -O2 -mcpu=i686:
> > > leal(%eax,%eax,4), %edx
> > > leal(%edx,%edx,4), %edx
> > >   sall$2, %edx
> > > for me.
> > > 
> > >   Jakub
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --
> > > Psyche-list mailing list
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > Psyche-list mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 







Re: A thought about psyche

2002-11-19 Thread Justin Zygmont
i'm willing to bet that MS PPTP is propriatory.  There's a lot of things 
that open source programmers would include, if it was possible.


On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Alan Peery wrote:

> Aaron Konstam wrote:
> 
> >This is not a deep thought but something that occurred to me that I have not
> >seen commented on anywhere else. If you were a windows user you would feel
> >really at home in psyche. Most windows users get no farther than using Windows
> >office and a browser. In RH 8 there they are on the task bar. The main menu
> >looks vaguely familiar. You can run a program from the run option or choose from 
> >added programs which look a lot like the selection in windows. Sure there is
> >more depth than that in RH 8 but it looks like a real attempt on Red Hat's part
> >to sell the product to former Microsoft fans. The Windows office files seem
> >even compatible with psyche office files. 
> >Quite a clever strategy if you ask me. What so others think?
> >  
> >
> There are areas that will turn power users of Microsoft right off.  It 
> was really nice to see a VPN connection offered in "neat" in a standard 
> install--but it doesn't work.  (Missing a directory and a device, two 
> items that appear if you install everything.)  The VPN uses CIPE, not 
> Microsoft PPTP--which makes it completely unusable in an already 
> existing infrastructure...
> 
> Alan
> --
> Alan Peery
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 



-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list



Re: gigabit nic

2002-11-20 Thread Justin Zygmont
there is support for many 1000baseT cards already, i've seen some of the 
copper ones very cheap also, just check with the hardware compatibility 
list first.  they will sure speed up things:)


On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Jim Christiansen wrote:

> 
> Hi,
> 
> My school is installing a couple of gigabit switches, and how much benefit 
> will there be to installing gigabit nics in our servers?  Our network is 
> about 60 NT boxes, 30 Linux thin clients, 1 NT domain server, and 5 linux 
> servers for various tasks.
> 
> Are there any cards I can just install into a box a have recognized at 
> startup?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jim
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _
> Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*  
> http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
> 
> 
> 
> 



-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list



Re: D-Link Linux support

2002-11-20 Thread Justin Zygmont
ha, so much for buying any more D-link cards!


On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Robert Savage wrote:

> FYI. Earlier today I asked D-Link about the availability of Linux drivers
> for their DI-754 access point and DWL-650+ and DWL-A650 wireless cards.
> Here's their response. Methinks 'Norman' needs to take an attitude pill,
> or find another line of work.
> 
> --Doc Savage
>   Fairview Heights, IL
> 
>  Original Message 
> Subject: RE:Case ID: 241228
> From: Robert Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, November 20, 2002 6:28 pm
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> Norman,
> 
> "Unfortunately, we do not have Linux drivers and most likely dlink will
> never come out with one."
> 
> That's a fairly harsh statement. Can you tell me why D-Link would choose
> not to support a globally established operating system with millions of
> users like Linux? Why ignore an operating system so openly supported by
> giant corporations like IBM, Dell, and Oracle? I can understand why
> D-Link would want to support Windows, but why be so flagrantly hostile
> to Linux? No profit can come from such a bad attitude.
> 
> If you don't want our money, could D-Link please publish its products'
> internal architecture information so that open-source Linux drivers can
> be written under the GNU Public License? This would make it possible for
> D-Link to expand its sales of DWL and DI products beyond the
> Windows-only market without spending a dime. Companies like Adaptec,
> Linksys, Lucent, AMI, and many others routinely make their technical
> information available open-source software developers who write and
> maintain hundreds of device drivers for Linux, UNIX, BSD, BeOS, and many
> other non-Windows operating systems.
> 
> V/R
> "Valued Customer"
> 
> > Dear Valued Customer,
> >
> > Critical: Please do not change the subject line of your email when you
> > reply. Leaving the subject line as it is will allow us to review your
> > complete history and help us to better serve you.
> >
> > Products:   DWL-A650
> > Operating System:  Linux
> >
> > Thank you for contacting D-Link Tech Support!
> >
> > Unfortunately, we do not have Linux drivers and most likely dlink will
> > never come out with one. Thank you.
> >
> >Start of Original Message 
> >
> > I recently purchased a DI-754 multi-mode AP with DWL-650+ and DWL-A650
> > cards for the express purpose of simultaneously supporting multiple
> > 802.11a and 802.11b clients running both Windows and Linux. While the
> > Windows drivers work fine, I need drivers for Red Hat Linux 8.0.
> > End of Original Message 
> >
> > Thank you for networking with D-Link.
> >
> > Sincerely,
> > Norman
> > D-Link Technical Support Team
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 



-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list



Re: PXE crossing subnets

2002-11-22 Thread Justin Zygmont
if it could be, I think it would be difficult at best.  You're using DHCP 
for obtaining IP information to the host right?  There is a dhcrelay that 
should do this, but I never tried it.  


On Fri, 22 Nov 2002, Stephen Mah wrote:

> Is it possible for a machine to network boot across subnets?
> 
> 
> 
> 



-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list



Re: Seeing who is logged in through ftp and ssh

2002-11-26 Thread Justin Zygmont
If you have root jailed users by configuring the ftpaccess file, but have 
ssh installed, all they have to do is sftp in and go wherever they want.  
It's a relief to know that at least they can't grab the shadow file too. 

I just found a quck way to disable this however, in the 
/etc/ssh/sshd_config comment out the line: 
Subsystem  sftp  /usr/libexec/openssh

 
On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, Randy Kelsoe wrote:

> Ed Wilts wrote:
> 
> >In many cases, ftp is *more* secure than sftp.  With ftp, you have a lot
> >of control over who can do what through the ftpaccess file (in wu-ftpd).
> >With sftp, it's a free-for-all.
> >
> >In very practical terms, the odds of anybody being able to sniff
> >passwords these days is very slim.  The odds of somebody grabbing your
> >passwd file if they've got sftp access to your system are much larger.
> >
> Maybe we could discuss this off-list. I don't see how sftp is a 
> 'free-for-all',  unless it is configured to bypass the user login and 
> password.
> Default RedHat installation requires a username  and a password for sftp 
> connections. A normal user could grab my passwd file, but not the shadow 
> passwd file, so I don't see how that would do them much good.
> 
> I am not a security expert, nor a cracker/hacker. I would like to learn 
> more, so if you have some time, please email me privately and elaborate.
> 
> rk
> 
> >  
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 



-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list



Re: Shell Scripting Question.

2002-11-26 Thread Justin Zygmont
try checking out the man page for find.  It is the -mtime option if I 
remember correctly.


On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, Dan de Haan wrote:

> I have a simple shell script that runs from cron and makes a backup of some
> filed to another PC via NFS.  I want to have it automatically delete old
> backups form the NFS server.  How would I do that, is there a delete files
> older then N days command?
> 
>   -Dan
> 
> 
> 
> 



-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list



Re: samba connections

2002-12-01 Thread Justin Zygmont
try smbpasswd -a  and also set your workgroup name in the samba.conf


On Sun, 1 Dec 2002, David Mascot wrote:

> Hi,
> You all probably new I would soon be back...anyhow I got Samba running
> and I can see it on my three Windows machines as "localhost".
> When I try to launch "localhost" from the two Win98 machines a password
> box pops up with \\localhost\ipc$\.  When I type the password it says
> not correct.  When I try launching "localhost" from the Win2k Pro
> machine a message says, "\\localhost is not accessable, a duplicate name
> exists on the network".
> I configured Samba from the directions at
> 
>http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/linux/RHL-8.0-Manual/custom-guide/s1-samba-configuring.html
> I did the:
> cat /etc/passwd | mksmbpasswd.sh > /etc/samba/smbpasswd
> And the:
> chmod 600 /etc/samba/smbpasswd
> But when I tried to do the:
> smbpasswd username
> I type a username (miyuki) and then the password, and then I re-type the
> password but then I get a message that says:
> "failed to modify password entry for user miyuki"
> I get the same results with my other two users also.
> All three users were also placed into the smb.conf file.
> Thanks again for you fine help
> Dave
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 



-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list



Re: Boot/Rescue CD instead of a floppy

2002-12-03 Thread Justin Zygmont
you know if the rescue disk is so poor now that it needs a CD, it's 
probably just better to use toms root boot.


On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Martin Stricker wrote:

> Mel Seder wrote:
> > 
> > --- Martin Stricker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > I've never run mkisofs before.  I looked at the man page and it was
> > overwhelming.  I don't want to run the risk of not being able to
> > create bootable CDs. If I can find a setp by step on what has to be
> > run I'd really like to make a bootable CD look exactly like a floppy.
> 
> Well, I *did* read the release-notes, but that was after I got my boxed
> set... Just for completion, I'll give you some hints how to do
> mkbootdisk --iso by hand:
> First, put your bootdisk into your floppy drive (I assume /dev/fd0 here,
> dev/floppy should work as well)
> dd if=/dev/fd0 of=boot.img bs=1440 count=1
> Now you have a bootable floopy image named boot.img in the current
> directory. Now create the ISO image file:
> mkisofs -b boot.img # incomplete command, sorry!
> Now burn the ISO as image.
> 
> > > When booting in rescue mode you can get your system by typing
> > > `chroot /mnt/sysimage`, but you still run the CD kernel, not your
> > > own installed kernel, so additional drivers you might have
> > > compiled in will not work.
> > 
> > The above explanation about getting my filesystem from Red Hat's
> > install disk is the best I've seen.  Every word had to fight for it's
> > deserved place in your response and your heads up about driver
> > availability was a welcome tid-bit.  This memo will we
> > semi-automatically move to my keeper mail folder.
> 
> LOL! Yeah, I know I tend to be terse. I'm a coder, thus I'm lazy. ;=D I
> don't like to waste time amd energy - I do this in my spare time... And
> English is a foreign language for me... I'm happy you enjoyed it!
> 
> And I ran into the driver problem once myself... ;=D
> 
> > Now I can try the Linux Care disk I burned.
> 
> Note: The LinuxCare CD might put the system in another place than
> /mnt/sysimage, so look out. And it's a Debian Linux system, so it might
> work slightly different than you are used to from Red Hat Linux.
> 



-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list



ANSI graphics not displaying properly in 8.0

2002-12-04 Thread Justin Zygmont
I have noticed that ANSI graphics are all messed up in 8.0.  in 7.3 it 
worked fine, does anyone have an idea why, could they have changed the 
default console font in 8.0?

thanks..




-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list



Re: Why you should not buy Promise products if you use Linux

2002-12-05 Thread Justin Zygmont
i've heard some good things about the 3ware controller, but software raid 
is said to out perform it still, at least from what I hear.  


On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Guy Fraser wrote:

> Hi
> 
> I checked some things out and from what I can tell, the 3Ware card is the best 
> overall with linux support, and is priced well. The card has a cpu on board 
> that handles the I/O so the cpu on your motherboard doesn't have to. I believe 
> it has a scsi driver and works like a scsi raid controller. 3Ware also has 
> software for linux to monitor and maintain the raid using a browser, and can 
> be configured to email someone if there are any problems. At ~ $120 US for an 
> IDE RAID 0,1,10,5,JBOD controller that supports hotswap and hotspare it is a 
> great deal. I will certainly be getting 3Ware in the future and maybe even 
> just to replace some other solutions we are currently using.
> 
> Guy
> 
> Dan de Haan wrote:
> >>Out of curiosity, has anyone here used the Adaptec 2400A? Is this also
> >>a "software" RAID card?
> >>
> > 
> > 
> > I haven't used it, but It is a hardware RAID card.  There was a article
> > published recently comparing soe hardware RAID cards, including the 2400A.
> > You can see it at: 
> > http://tech-report.com/reviews/2002q4/ideraid/index.x?pg=1
> > 
> > -Dan
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 



-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list



Re: ANSI graphics not displaying properly in 8.0

2002-12-05 Thread Justin Zygmont
I just looked at this, does anyone know how to change the console font, 
and if this is just a bug that makes the ansis and ncurses display 
improperly or is that the way it will be from now on.

responses from anyone who knows would be greatly appreciated.
thanks..



On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Michael Fratoni wrote:

> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On Thursday 05 December 2002 12:28 am, Justin Zygmont wrote:
> > I have noticed that ANSI graphics are all messed up in 8.0.  in 7.3 it
> > worked fine, does anyone have an idea why, could they have changed the
> > default console font in 8.0?
> 
> They could have, yes. ;)
> 
> grep -A 20 "Distribution General Notes"
> /usr/share/doc/redhat-release-8.0/RELEASE-NOTES-i386
> 
> - -- 
> - -Michael
> 
> pgp key:  http://www.tuxfan.homeip.net:8080/gpgkey.txt
> Red Hat Linux 7.{2,3}|8.0 in 8M of RAM: http://www.rule-project.org/
> - --
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
> 
> iD8DBQE97ua7n/07WoAb/SsRAledAJ9CytgrrA+Pp6n/yPIZ6QRw14cqrQCghzI/
> Gbyh0zfbRm0k61U/lAs0HxQ=
> =4337
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
> 
> 
> 
> 



-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list



RE: ANSI graphics not displaying properly in 8.0

2002-12-05 Thread Justin Zygmont
dam, the price went down and I was just ready to order it too..  
There's a few things i'll try, if it really is ncurses, then perhaps it 
could be fixed by forcing on the version from 7.3.  i've got a test 
install, i'll try some things and see.


On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, chadd wrote:

> It's not the font.  They hve introduced a bug into the ncurses display
> package w/ RH8.  I've already got a bug open on it..  I'll try to see if i
> can find it and post the link. You're SOL unitl they post a fix (or more
> likely fix it in RH8.1.
> c
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Justin Zygmont
> Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 10:03 PM
> To: Michael Fratoni
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: ANSI graphics not displaying properly in 8.0
> 
> 
> I just looked at this, does anyone know how to change the console font,
> and if this is just a bug that makes the ansis and ncurses display
> improperly or is that the way it will be from now on.
> 
> responses from anyone who knows would be greatly appreciated.
> thanks..
> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Michael Fratoni wrote:
> 
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On Thursday 05 December 2002 12:28 am, Justin Zygmont wrote:
> > > I have noticed that ANSI graphics are all messed up in 8.0.  in 7.3 it
> > > worked fine, does anyone have an idea why, could they have changed the
> > > default console font in 8.0?
> >
> > They could have, yes. ;)
> >
> > grep -A 20 "Distribution General Notes"
> > /usr/share/doc/redhat-release-8.0/RELEASE-NOTES-i386
> >
> > - --
> > - -Michael
> >
> > pgp key:  http://www.tuxfan.homeip.net:8080/gpgkey.txt
> > Red Hat Linux 7.{2,3}|8.0 in 8M of RAM: http://www.rule-project.org/
> > - --
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> > Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
> >
> > iD8DBQE97ua7n/07WoAb/SsRAledAJ9CytgrrA+Pp6n/yPIZ6QRw14cqrQCghzI/
> > Gbyh0zfbRm0k61U/lAs0HxQ=
> > =4337
> > -END PGP SIGNATURE-
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Psyche-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
> 
> 
> 
> 



-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list



Re: ANSI graphics not displaying properly in 8.0

2002-12-07 Thread Justin Zygmont
Thanks for everyone who helped!

these changes (mainly the LANG setting) to the /etc/sysconfig/i18n file 
fixed most of the problems.

#LANG="en_US.UTF-8"
  LANG="en_US"
SUPPORTED="en_US.UTF-8:en_US:en"
#SYSFONT="latarcyrheb-sun16"
  SYSFONT="lat0-sun16"

I noticed that ncurses and ansis still aren't quite right, it's mainly 
anything that was yellow is now brown.  Even at bootup, the [OK] are 
dimmed more, does anyone happen to know where this can be changed?

thanks..



-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list



dhcp client problem

2002-12-07 Thread Justin Zygmont
just in case anyone gets a message like this on their dhcp server, it 
seems rh 8 doesn't like having a 0 lease time.  it is endless:)  Hope this 
helps if anyone runs into this.

dhcpd: DHCPDISCOVER from 00:50:ba:c9:d1:58 via eth1
dhcpd: DHCPOFFER on 192.168.0.2 to 00:50:ba:c9:d1:58 via eth1
dhcpd: DHCPREQUEST for 192.168.0.2 from 00:50:ba:c9:d1:58 via eth1
dhcpd: DHCPACK on 192.168.0.2 to 00:50:ba:c9:d1:58 via eth1
dhcpd: DHCPDISCOVER from 00:50:ba:c9:d1:58 via eth1
dhcpd: DHCPOFFER on 192.168.0.2 to 00:50:ba:c9:d1:58 via eth1
dhcpd: DHCPREQUEST for 192.168.0.2 from 00:50:ba:c9:d1:58 via eth1
dhcpd: DHCPACK on 192.168.0.2 to 00:50:ba:c9:d1:58 via eth1
dhcpd: DHCPDISCOVER from 00:50:ba:c9:d1:58 via eth1
dhcpd: DHCPOFFER on 192.168.0.2 to 00:50:ba:c9:d1:58 via eth1
dhcpd: DHCPREQUEST for 192.168.0.2 from 00:50:ba:c9:d1:58 via eth1
dhcpd: DHCPACK on 192.168.0.2 to 00:50:ba:c9:d1:58 via eth1
dhcpd: DHCPDISCOVER from 00:50:ba:c9:d1:58 via eth1
dhcpd: DHCPOFFER on 192.168.0.2 to 00:50:ba:c9:d1:58 via eth1




-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list



Re: ANSI graphics not displaying properly in 8.0 (SOLVED)

2002-12-07 Thread Justin Zygmont
please ignore my last message.  I ended up rebooting and everything is 
displays perfect.  Thanks again to those who helped.


On Sat, 7 Dec 2002, Justin Zygmont wrote:

> Thanks for everyone who helped!
> 
> these changes (mainly the LANG setting) to the /etc/sysconfig/i18n file 
> fixed most of the problems.
> 
> #LANG="en_US.UTF-8"
>   LANG="en_US"
> SUPPORTED="en_US.UTF-8:en_US:en"
> #SYSFONT="latarcyrheb-sun16"
>   SYSFONT="lat0-sun16"
> 
> I noticed that ncurses and ansis still aren't quite right, it's mainly 
> anything that was yellow is now brown.  Even at bootup, the [OK] are 
> dimmed more, does anyone happen to know where this can be changed?
> 
> thanks..
> 
> 



-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list



Re: NFS iso install problem

2002-12-11 Thread Justin Zygmont
it's probably one of the many bugs in the installer, i've had it hang on 
me a few times, but I find some of the past releases were a lot worse.  
What kind of computer do you have?


On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, A.J. Werkman wrote:

> When I tried to install RH80 from an NFS server from the iso-images in an 
> NFS-directory the install crashed.
> 
> I did a text based install using custom package selection. On the package 
> selection screen instead of seeing the package groups to choose from I had 
> the choice between the different documentation guides. When I hit the 
> -button in this screen the system crashed with a signal 11.
> 
> Anyone else seen this?
> 
> Koos.
> 
> 
> 
> 



-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list



Re: Why Telnet? (Was RE: Connection refused - why?)

2002-12-13 Thread Justin Zygmont
there may be some reasons, I noticed that the issue file doesn't always 
display properly with ssh, or not all the clients may have an ssh program, 
or security is not an issue...  I use ssh


On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Shoemaker, Michael (STL) wrote:

> Out of curiosity, why telnet?  
> 
> Its seems there is no gain using telnet over ssh.  Why would anyone expose the 
>security risks associated with telnet, even on an isolated network?  I just see no 
>reason to use it and Id like to hear why other do.  
> 
> Mike
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Mr. Adam ALLEN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 10:08 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Connection refused - why?
> 
> 
> On Fri, 2002-12-13 at 15:59, John Nall wrote:
> > When I try to ftp (or telnet) from one RH8.0 system to another RH8.0 
> > system I get the message "connection refused."  I can ping between 
> > them OK, and the security level is supposedly set to allow access.  
> > What else do I need to do?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > John
> 
> /etc/xinetd.d/vsftpd
> /etc/xinetd.d/telnet
> 
> If those two files have "disable = yes" then those services are disabled. Simple 
>edit the files for a "disable = no" and then service xinetd restart
> 
> BTW: SSH is enabled by default since it provides encrypted sessions. However if you 
>don't mind passwords going in clear text, then telnet is fine.
> 
> 
> 



-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list



Re: post-installation suggestions for RH 8.0

2002-12-13 Thread Justin Zygmont
there must be something wrong with it, it can't display certain graphics 
files properly, probably because it doesn't support their control codes.
It's just saying the gimp uses a new rendering format and doesn't display 
jpegs properly.


On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Miloslav Trmac wrote:

> On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 11:11:16AM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >   LANG="en_US"
> > 
> > can anyone suggest other little fixes that should be done?
> Please, don't publish this as a "fix". It is a *workaround* for tools
> that don't support UTF-8 well enough yet, not a bug fix. The decision
> to use UTF-8 was not a bug, but a very conscious one (see the release
> notes). Most of the people who are not using UTF-8 now will just have
> to go through the pain of conversion later (although it may be a bit
> easier later, when the bugs are shaken out).
>   Mirek
> 
> 
> 
> 



-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list



Re: mkfs vfat fails fs too large

2002-12-13 Thread Justin Zygmont
vfat by definitios does not support more than a 2 GB partition, it's fat 
32 that does.  try testing this to see that it.


On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Bas wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I tried to make a vfat filesystem on my second harddrive.
> mkfs gave an error fs too large.
> I think this is a bug in mkfs.
> 
> Does anyone knows if there is a workaround for this ?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Bas
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 



-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list



Re: Weird hard drive boot message

2002-12-15 Thread Justin Zygmont
I would get these errors sometimes with my drive that was in a rack such 
as yours, but it was only after I used it for a while and it would heat 
up.


On Sun, 15 Dec 2002, Cedric Chausson wrote:

> Hello all,
> 
> I get a weird message about one of my hard disks during boot : It says 
> this :
> 
> Dec 15 13:55:17 kernel: hdd: dma_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady 
> SeekComplete Error }
> Dec 15 13:55:17 kernel: hdd: dma_intr: error=0x84 { DriveStatusError 
> BadCRC }
> 
> This message is repeated several times in the /var/log/messages file. 
> Despite these messages the hard disk is mounted and operationnal at the 
> end.
> But it doesn't look good so I'm wondering if I must do something to 
> solve this.
> 
> Note that hdd is a hard drive which is in a extractible rack.  Can this 
> be due to this physical situation ? It is a Maxtor 80 Go disk.
> 
> Any ideas to solve this ?
> 
> Thanks in advance.
> 
> 
> 
> 



-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list



Re: Psyche is not rapid, why???

2002-12-17 Thread Justin Zygmont
> Windows preloads stuff to make it seem that the Microsoft apps launch
> faster (IE, Word, Excel etc.)

this might explain why netscape would load a bit faster in win98 for me 
also.




-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list



Re: Can not create RAID 5 partition for install

2002-12-17 Thread Justin Zygmont
i've had a lot of problems trying to setup a raid 1 partition, it's would 
only create a partition on one disk and not even touch the other one, plus 
countles other problems, I think RH sure screwed up raid this time, maybe 
they'll fix it by version 10.


On Tue, 17 Dec 2002, JUSTIN GERRY wrote:

> ???What am I missing??
> 
> I've tried repeatedly to install 8.0 into a system that has 3 hard
> drives for a software based RAID 5 setup.
> 
> I am able to go through disk druid just fine... only when it tries to
> install to the hard drives do I get this error:
> 
> "The Kernel was unable to re-read the partition table on /dev/hdd
> (device or resource busy). This means linux knows nothing about any
> modifications you made. You should reboot your computer before doing
> anything with /dev/hdd "...The only option at this point is "Ignore". 
> 
> I get this message on all three hard drives (HDA,HDD,HDC), I then have
> to cycle through the errors 6 times (2 for each drive).  Then the
> installer will actually go through and act like its installing the
> software. Once I reboot there is nothing found for a partition table. 
> 
> I want to set it up like this to get maximum redundancy.  Apparently I
> can not set up a /boot or /swap within a RAID 5 partition. 
> 
> RAID 5 /dev/MD0 
> 
> HDA 
> /boot
> /swap
> /software RAID
> 
> HDB
> /free space (same size as /boot and swap on other drive)
> /software RAID
> 
> HDC
> /free space (same size as /boot and swap on other drive)
> /software RAID
> 
> 
> 
> 



-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list



Re: Can not create RAID 5 partition for install

2002-12-18 Thread Justin Zygmont
thanks, but it's not that I don't know what i'm doing.  I could setup a 
raid 1 partition with 7.3 with no probs, but not with psyche; not 
including several other installation problems...


On 18 Dec 2002, Craig White wrote:

> On Tue, 2002-12-17 at 22:18, Justin Zygmont wrote:
> 
> > i've had a lot of problems trying to setup a raid 1 partition, it's would 
> > only create a partition on one disk and not even touch the other one, plus 
> > countles other problems, I think RH sure screwed up raid this time, maybe 
> > they'll fix it by version 10.
> > 
> 
> --
> I didn't find it very hard to set up RAID level 1 at all.
> 
> I'm not that smart.
> 
> but there actually is information in the manual...
> 
><http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/linux/RHL-8.0-Manual/install-guide/s1-diskpartitioning.html#S2-DISKPARTITIONING-DD>
> 
> and more specifically
> 
><http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/linux/RHL-8.0-Manual/custom-guide/ch-raid-intro.html>
> 
> and even most specifically
> 
><http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/linux/RHL-8.0-Manual/custom-guide/ch-software-raid.html>
> 
> but some people didn't even know that the manuals had this info...
> 
> Craig
> 
> 



-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list



RE: Can not create RAID 5 partition for install

2002-12-18 Thread Justin Zygmont
On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, Vik Heyndrickx wrote:

> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Justin Zygmont
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 6:18 AM
> > To: JUSTIN GERRY
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: Can not create RAID 5 partition for install
> >
> > i've had a lot of problems trying to setup a raid 1 partition, it's would
> > only create a partition on one disk and not even touch the other
> > one, plus
> > countles other problems, I think RH sure screwed up raid this time, maybe
> > they'll fix it by version 10.
> 
> May I guess; you did the text install, didn't you? That one is definitely
> broken as it concerns RAID. The X install worked for me fine, though.

both actually, and it's usualally text that has a better chance of success 
from what i've noticed.




-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list



package: kernel-headers

2002-12-19 Thread Justin Zygmont
I was just trying to install a package from the RH 8 CD and it said there 
was a failed dependancy and kernel-headers was required.  I looked on the 
CD's and on the ftp sites and there is no such thing.  Does anyone know 
what happened to it, or if it just has a new name these days?




-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list



Re: Kernel panic with ext3 root set to writeback

2002-12-20 Thread Justin Zygmont
On 20 Dec 2002, Chris Kloiber wrote:

> Wouldn't this be something to be put in /etc/fstab where you normally
> see "defaults"? Yep, check out 'man mount', it's in the 'Mount options
> for ext3' section. data=writeback. Before you actually do this however,
> I've heard this option is fast, but not always safe in the event of a
> crash. YMMV.

depends on what you really need it for, it is possible to have corrupt 
data written to a file like this, but it is also probably very rare.




-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list



Re: PCMCIA/IRQ problems

2002-12-23 Thread Justin Zygmont
I'm not sure if the helps with your case but I had a card that I had to 
reprogram since it was PnP and it's default IRQ would conflict.  The 
solution was to download the utilities from the manufacturer's web site 
and in the diagnostics, there was an option to find a new default IRQ.


On Mon, 23 Dec 2002, Marco Fioretti wrote:

> On Sun, Dec 22, 2002 13:08:05 at 01:08:05PM -0700, William F. Acker WB2FLW 
>+1-303-777-8123 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Hi Marco,
> > 
> >  My wife had the same problem on her Toshiba Tecra 730CDT with the 
> > same SCSI card.  It went away with the application of an errata kernel.  I
> 
> I have upgraded to the latest kernel available from the errata site,
> and put back the pcmcia config file working in RH 7.2: no luck.
> 
> I still get the IRQ warning mentioned in my first message. If I plug
> in the SCSI adapter I get one high beep, one low beep and the message:
> 
> cs: warning: no high memory space available!
> cs: unable to map card memory!
> 
> I don't know if it is related to this problem, but dmesg, both now and
> with the previous kernel, also says:
> 
> ohci1394: pci_module_init failed
> 
> One thing I don't get is the advice in the initial warning message:
> 
> "Please try using pci=biosirq"
> 
> Where should I set this option? In which file?
> 
>   TIA.
>   Marco Fioretti 
> 
> 
> 
> 



-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list



Re: Much Slower than 7.2?

2002-12-23 Thread Justin Zygmont
is data-ordered really that much slower, I don;t think I really noticed a 
difference.  BTW, wasn't the default data-journal in previous releases, 
imagine how slow that would be for you then:)


On Mon, 23 Dec 2002, Tom Ball wrote:

> On Mon, 2002-12-23 at 10:00, Ronald W. Heiby wrote:
> > I've got a large data compilation application. It takes in a very
> > large quantity of text data and produces a resulting binary file that
> > is about 1.3 GB. In the mean time, it holds on the order of 2 GB of
> > data in memory while operating on it to produce the output file.
> 
> I also found 8.0 much slower for my smaller builds.  One thing that's
> different in 8.0 is the ext3 filesystem, which I converted to when
> upgrading.  By default it runs in ordered data mode, which causes writes
> to disk to happen much more frequently than on ext2 filesystems.  
> 
> This is normally a goodness, because if your system crashes it takes
> much less time to reboot with a working filesystem.  For a build system,
> however, it's okay to crash in the middle of a build because it is (or
> should be) easy to start over with a clean data set.  The ext3
> filesystem supports a writeback mode which works well for me.
> 
> To turn writeback on, you need to add "data=writeback" to the build
> partition's flags in fstab.  IMPORTANT: if you are setting the root
> partition, you need to run /sbin/mkinitrd so your initrd file has the
> same setting (either overwrite the one in /boot, or create a new one and
> change your grub or lilo file to point to it).
> 
> Keep a rescue disk handy when you commit these changes!
> 
> Tom
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 



-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list



RAID 1 problem

2002-12-24 Thread Justin Zygmont
I have been testing a raid 1 installation and I have noticed that only hda 
is actually bootable.  I'm using / as the raid partition and when I 
disconnect hda and try to boot from hdc, all i get is a line saying GRUB 
and that's it.  Both raid partitions are active on each drive.




-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list



Re: RAID 1 problem

2002-12-25 Thread Justin Zygmont
On Wed, 25 Dec 2002, Mike Watson wrote:

> > --__--__--
> >
> > Message: 5
> > Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2002 15:45:15 -0500 (EST)
> > From: Justin Zygmont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RAID 1 problem
> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > I have been testing a raid 1 installation and I have noticed that only hda 
> > is actually bootable.  I'm using / as the raid partition and when I 
> > disconnect hda and try to boot from hdc, all i get is a line saying GRUB 
> > and that's it.  Both raid partitions are active on each drive.
> >
> First, where is your /BOOT partition?  You should have one on each disk.  Then,
> using Grub, make each disk bootable.  Each /BOOT must have a Grub folder wih a Grub 
> grub.conf.  You should have partitioned each disk identically.  That way you can use
> the same grub.conf.  If you didn't, then each disk must have a gurb.conf configured
> to match the partition scheme of that disk.
> 
> It worked for me.

Is this really necessary, I tested a 7.3 install and each drive worked on 
it's own easily when I tried to simulate a drive failure.  With 8.0 it 
doesn't look like it will do that for some reason, I can still mount the 
second HD but cannot boot off of it.  

Can anyone on the list that was a software RAID 1 scheme similar to mine
( /dev/md0 = / ) confirm that their system will boot off either drive?

thanks..





-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list



Re: RAID 1 problem - solved, follow up

2002-12-25 Thread Justin Zygmont
I have tested some different things out and it seems to work ok now.  What 
I noticed is that the partitioning on the drives should be the same if you 
want to raid / and be able to boot any drive individually to simulate a 
failure.  Otherwise you'll have to edit the grub line (if you can 
get to one) and change the hd=x,x line to whetever it should be for the 
differently partitioned drive.  However, using one drive, I switched it 
from the hda to hdc or vice versa, it would still boot because it is 
hd=0,0.  I upgraded the kernel and even made some other changes and it 
still worked fine, so I don't see the need for a seperate /boot partition 
afterall.  

hope this helps anyone else ...

P.S.  Many of the installer errors went away when I changed a HD, even 
though it is perfectly functional.  Seems like anaconda is just picky 
about hardware...




-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list



Re: answering machine software

2002-12-26 Thread Justin Zygmont
try vgetty, with tkVoice as the frontend.  I can't remember the link 
offhand..


On Thu, 26 Dec 2002, Jochen Kaechelin wrote:

> Does anybody know an answering machine software
> for kde?
> 
> I used vbox on my old SuSE 7.3 and it works fine for me.
> But i do not want to install it again, because it needs
> inetd.
> 
> I use a FritzCard PCI ISDN-Device - no modem?
> 
> Thanx.
> 
> 



-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list



Re: ISO INSTALLATION FAILS

2002-12-28 Thread Justin Zygmont
the ISO install if not for a CDROM, it is if you have a th ISO file on a 
harddrive and you select the proper drive and path where these files are.


On Sat, 28 Dec 2002, arriba wrote:

> 
> Hello,
> 
> I have downloaded the ISO cd´s and when I try to install the Red Hat
> this is what I get,
> 
> 1- It is impossible to load the GUI interface whereas with 7.2 I did not
> have any problem.
> 
> 2- Discarding the GUI installation I tried the text mode. After
> selecting the country and the keyboard, the installation program
> inquires me to tell it where is the ISO image file. I choose the CD-ROM
> from a drop menu, and it can not find the ISO image continuosly. 
> 
> Did somebody get the same message How can I install it???
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 



-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list



Re: ISO INSTALLATION FAILS

2002-12-28 Thread Justin Zygmont
you don't understand me, there is a cdrom install that you mentioned 
here, but installing from iso means that you are using the iso's without 
burning them to CD.


On Sat, 28 Dec 2002, Dave Yantis wrote:

> On Sat, 28 Dec 2002 14:44:07 -0500 (EST), Justin Zygmont wrote:
> >the ISO install if not for a CDROM, it is if you have a th ISO file
> >on a
> >harddrive and you select the proper drive and path where these files
> >are.
> >
> >
> 
> I disagree.  The ISO install images that are on the Red Hat FTP site 
> are to be used to burn a CD.  If your BIOS supports booting from a 
> CD-ROM, you can then do the install from the CD that was burned from 
> the ISO image.
> 
> As to the original poster's question, I had no problem doing the 
> install from the CD that I created from the ISO image.  I did go 
> through the trouble to do the media check.
> 
> Thanks,
> dy
> 
> --
> Entropy is not what is used to be.
> 
> http://www.yantis.org
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 



-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list



Re: RH8 and GAIM : unable to read

2003-01-03 Thread Justin Zygmont
I tried quickly using it for icq and I couldn't log in, did you have 
success with this before, what did you have to change to log in?


On 4 Jan 2003, Philippe wrote:

> Hi everybody.
> I used Gaim for a while then stopped, and decided to use it again.
> But from yesterday, it is impossible to connect to yahoo ?
> Has anything changed with Gaim (0.59.6 and 0.59.7). ?
> Anyone else has difficulties to log on ?
> The message is just "user has been sign off : unable to read"
> Is it a change in Yahoo protocol ?
> Is it something to do with the last RH8 kernel ?
> Or is it only from my country (Thailand) ?
> Any comments or information will be welcomed.
> Thanks
> Philippe
> 



-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list



Re: gaim-applet

2003-01-04 Thread Justin Zygmont
where can you login to use icq?  I have tried a few addresses, including 
login.icq.com but it always fails, is there something i'm missing?

thanks..


On 5 Jan 2003, Dennis Gilmore wrote:

> On Sun, 2003-01-05 at 06:07, David Colburn wrote:
> 
> > Just downloaded and installed CVS, that went smoothly, for a change.
> > 
> go to gaim.sourceforge.net/cvs.php they sugget you run ./autogen not
> ./gen  i'd say the info at linuxheadquarters is out of date. then run
> ./configure  the applet is automatically built in its a plugin that you
> need to select for it to work now. they also sugest you use gmake then
> gmake install  i personally just use make then make install and havent
> had any hicups yet.
> 
> Dennis
> 
> > Then went to get GAIM using the following process from 
> > www.linuxheadquarters.com/howto/apps/gaim.shtml  but hit an error late
> > in the process: 
> > 
> > 1. cvs -d ':pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot/gaim'
> > login (just press Enter when password is requested)
> > 
> > 2. cvs -z3 -d
> > ':pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot/gaim' co gaim
> > 
> > 3. cd gaim
> > 
> > 4. ./gen
> > 
> > ***ERROR***
> > 
> > At this point I get an error saying there is no such file or directory.
> > What is the best way to resolve this, please?
> > 
> > 5. ./configure OR ./configure --enable-panel (to compile GAIM as a Gnome
> > Applet)
> > 
> > 6. make
> > 
> > 7. make install
> > 
> > Thanks!  doc 
> > 
> > 
> 



-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list



Re: gaim-applet

2003-01-04 Thread Justin Zygmont
that's all it was, and I was sure I tried that already, geez.


On 5 Jan 2003, Dennis Gilmore wrote:

> On Sun, 2003-01-05 at 12:51, Justin Zygmont wrote:
> > where can you login to use icq?  I have tried a few addresses, including 
> > login.icq.com but it always fails, is there something i'm missing?
> > 
> > thanks..
> i use 
> 
> login.oscar.aol.com
> port 5190
> 
> my icq number is my screenname
> 
> 



-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list



Re: rawrite

2003-01-07 Thread Justin Zygmont
of course it is.


On 8 Jan 2003, Patrick wrote:

> I am not sure if RH supports Pentium class computers. Please check the
> hardware compatibility list on redhat.com if a P75 is supported at all.
> 
> Cheers,
> Patrick 
> 
> On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 13:13, Gerard Zwart wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> > 
> > This will be my first time installing RH.
> > I was told to take and old P75 or so, with 64Mb.
> > 
> > And so I did, unfortunately it is too old to boot up from CD.
> > No problem I thought, I make a bootbable flop, and this was described
> > in the readme also.
> > 
> > But here comes my poblem, after 5 different floppy's and 3! Differente
> > stations on 3 different PC's I keep on getting the message "Controller
> > Failed"
> > 
> > This is what I do:
> > 
> > Rawrite
> > and then enter image location and name :
> > g:\images\boot.img
> > target: a:
> > then I put a fres formatted flop in the station and
> > press ENTER
> > after a while about 3 minutes being busy, I get this
> > message : " Controller has failed"
> > 
> > Anybody knows what is happening, how to solve this, or   any other
> > ways to make a bootable diskette.
> > 
> > Thx in advance and chers to all.
> > 
> > Gerard
> > Netherlands
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> 



-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list



GRUB problems

2003-01-14 Thread Justin Zygmont
I seem to be getting this error when I tried using grub-install:  
/dev/xxx does not have a corresponding BIOS drive.  Does anyone know what 
this means, my computer just says GRUB loading stage 2 at bootup and 
hangs.  Even when I tried writing a new bootdisk, it does the same.  It 
seems like running grub-install /dev/xxx changed something.  

thanks..






-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list



Re: GRUB problems

2003-01-14 Thread Justin Zygmont
It doesn't list the error I am getting.  Now matter what I do it keeps 
saying:  /dev/md0 does not have a corresponding BIOS drive
Any help would be greatly appreciated.


On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, cfraz wrote:

> Justin Zygmont wrote:
> > I seem to be getting this error when I tried using grub-install:  
> > /dev/xxx does not have a corresponding BIOS drive.  Does anyone know what 
> > this means, my computer just says GRUB loading stage 2 at bootup and 
> > hangs.  Even when I tried writing a new bootdisk, it does the same.  It 
> > seems like running grub-install /dev/xxx changed something.  
> > 
> > thanks..
> 
> $:  info grub
> there is a troubleshooting section including error messages in stage 2 
> which should be helpful
> 
> Franck
> 
> 
> 
> 



-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list



Re: GRUB problems - SOLVED

2003-01-14 Thread Justin Zygmont
I just managed to get it, I hope this could save someone else trouble if 
your system ever becomes unbootable.  

Don't use grub-install

and to setup grub to boot again, type 'grub' to get to it's command line, 
then type:  root (hdx,x)   find /boot/grub/stage1   setup (hd0)
and it should work..



On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, Justin Zygmont wrote:

> It doesn't list the error I am getting.  Now matter what I do it keeps 
> saying:  /dev/md0 does not have a corresponding BIOS drive
> Any help would be greatly appreciated.
> 
> 
> On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, cfraz wrote:
> 
> > Justin Zygmont wrote:
> > > I seem to be getting this error when I tried using grub-install:  
> > > /dev/xxx does not have a corresponding BIOS drive.  Does anyone know what 
> > > this means, my computer just says GRUB loading stage 2 at bootup and 
> > > hangs.  Even when I tried writing a new bootdisk, it does the same.  It 
> > > seems like running grub-install /dev/xxx changed something.  
> > > 
> > > thanks..
> > 
> > $:  info grub
> > there is a troubleshooting section including error messages in stage 2 
> > which should be helpful
> > 
> > Franck
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> 



-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list



Re: RAM

2002-10-05 Thread Justin Zygmont
does anyone know if you really need swap if you already have a lot of RAM?


On 5 Oct 2002, Dennis Gilmore wrote:

>
> > One of my work colleagues (an ex-mainframe guy) coined a phrase well
> > worth repeating here:
> > "All good operating systems will use all the memory you give them."
> >
> > :-)
>
> One of the servers where i work has 1Gb of ram doesnt actually do much
> never goes over 200mb of physical ram used  but still insits on using
> swap space,  os will remain unnamed.
>
> Dennis
>
>
>
> --
> Psyche-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
>







Re: RAM

2002-10-05 Thread Justin Zygmont
I wish someone from RH could confirm this, I have a lot of ram but not a 
lot of disk space and i'd hate to waste it:)


On 5 Oct 2002, Evan Read wrote:

> My understanding is that it is a good idea ;)
> 
> Even a little swap is handy, otherwise Linux kernel code exhibits bad
> performance.  Though bad is relative.  There is a document on the web
> discussing Linux vs FreeBSD database performance with 0 swap space.
> 
> FreeBSD was ok (obviously designed to deal with it) and Linux sucked
> (having _some_ swap made all the difference).
> 
> Can't immediately find the reference.  Anyone else remember it?
> 
> Prolly gonna be fixed in 2.6 I suppose.
> 
> Evan.
> 
> On Sat, 2002-10-05 at 17:20, Justin Zygmont wrote:
> > does anyone know if you really need swap if you already have a lot of RAM?
> > 
> > 
> > On 5 Oct 2002, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > 
> > >
> > > > One of my work colleagues (an ex-mainframe guy) coined a phrase well
> > > > worth repeating here:
> > > > "All good operating systems will use all the memory you give them."
> > > >
> > > > :-)
> > >
> > > One of the servers where i work has 1Gb of ram doesnt actually do much
> > > never goes over 200mb of physical ram used  but still insits on using
> > > swap space,  os will remain unnamed.
> > >
> > > Dennis
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Psyche-list mailing list
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > Psyche-list mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
> > 
> 







grub

2002-10-06 Thread Justin Zygmont
does anyone know where there is more info for grub?  I am used to lilo and 
a test installation gives me an error saying: GRUB geom error.

thanks..








Re: grub

2002-10-06 Thread Justin Zygmont
On Sun, 6 Oct 2002, cfraz wrote:

> On Sun, 6 Oct 2002 14:22:13 -0400 (EDT)
> Justin Zygmont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > does anyone know where there is more info for grub?  I am used to lilo and 
> > a test installation gives me an error saying: GRUB geom error.
> > 
> > thanks..
> > 
> IMHO the best is to have a look to the grub manual at gnu.org
> 
> Did you change the BIOS translated geometry or move the disk to another machine or 
>controller after installation ?

yes, that's why it's giving that error now.  At least with linux I could 
use a boot disk to get in and re run lilo, but the grub boot disk still 
gives me that error

> Franck
> 
> 
> 
> 







Re: Freeze on bootup after install with Redhat 8.0

2002-10-06 Thread Justin Zygmont
when you hard reboot, will it startt up properly then?  I used to have 
this but hat was a long time ago, I suspected it to be a a setting in the 
bios that was causing it, try disabling some of the shadowing or playing 
around with the bios and see.


On Sun, 6 Oct 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> I just put RedHat 8.0 on my system and it will not boot all the 
> way.  On every attempt it always freezes at the same point when:
> 
> INIT: version 2.84 booting
> 
> is displayed on the screen.  I thought once that it may be the 
> ext3 filesystem, so I also tried ext2.  It also has nothing to 
> do with Windows XP being on the same machine because I reloaded 
> both operating systems and when I put on RedHat first it still 
> did not work.  I've tried everything I can think of... including 
> putting init=/bin/sh as a kernel parameter but it still freezes 
> at the same point.  I must hard reboot to restart the machine 
> at this point too.
> 
> If anyone can help or has any ideas, please let me know.
> 
> Thanks,
> Brandon Ryan
> 
> ___
> Sent by ePrompter, the premier email notification software.
> Free download at http://www.ePrompter.com.
> 
> 
> 
> 







Re: GNOME vs. KDE

2002-10-07 Thread Justin Zygmont
On Sun, 6 Oct 2002, Anthony Abby wrote:

> What you see is neither Gnome nor KDE in RH 8!  Kind of comical actually... if you 
>choose KDE as your default GUI, it still lists all your KDE apps under EXTRAS.. 
>like.. huh???
> 
> I think I'm going to reinstall RH 7.3 and just upgrade the kernal.  Think Redhat did 
>all a huge disservice with RH 8.
> 
> Anthony

i dunno, looks pretty smooth and simple to me, and a lot more consistent 
too.









RE: How To Verify Software RAID?

2002-10-07 Thread Justin Zygmont
the 2 U's show which drives are currently part of the array.  The 
raid-howto on redhat's site is a good source of info for this.


On Mon, 7 Oct 2002, Cochran Robert L (NO) wrote:

> Thanks, Thom and Doc. Actually someone on the list sent me a private email
> suggesting I check /proc/raidtab. If there are 2 U's next to the entry,
> things are working. I couldn't find a /proc/raidtab but I did find
> /proc/mdstat and there are 2 U's next to each of the 2 RAID devices (md0 and
> md1) I configured. I have not the slightest idea what those 2 U's refer to
> and need to learn.
> 
> I still want to do what Thom and one other person suggested. In my case I
> don't care about backing up data too much except for the kickstart
> configuration file and /etc/mail. The machine is brand new and has no other
> critical data on it yet. But it soon will when I migrate my work to it. I'll
> pull the plugs on md0 and see if md1 can take over...
> 
> If I had critical files on there I'd backup things first. Far too many
> people don't follow Doc's advice and then have long faces when a crash
> happens to them. 
> 
> Thanks
>  
> Robert L. Cochran
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:dsavage@;peaknet.net]
> Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 12:22 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: How To Verify Software RAID?
> 
> 
> > On Sun, 2002-10-06 at 00:19, Robert L Cochran wrote:
> > > I just installed 8.0 to my self-built computer. I believe I have
> > > configured software RAID sucessfully. But how do I verify that RAID is
> > > working?
> > 
> > Unplug the power from a hard drive?
> 
> Gakkk!!! Before or after you back up any critical files?
> 
> Reminds me of the saying:
> 
>There are old pilots, and
>there are bold pilots, but
>there are no old bold pilots.
> 
> --Doc Savage
>   Fairview Heights,
> IL
> 
> -
> This message was sent from Peaknet, Inc.
> http://www.peaknet.net/
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 







Re: Pine problem new in 8.0

2002-10-08 Thread Justin Zygmont
I noticed that in pine it doesn't automatically carriage return when I hit 
reply, does anyone know if there is a setting for that is off hand?








Re: Hyper Threaded Pentium 4

2002-10-14 Thread Justin Zygmont
this shouldn't have to be the case, when the P-pro came out it was like 
that because of it's new features and intel just wanted to get it out the 
door, but when the P-II came out it had optimization for 16 bit code + a 
lot of other bug fixes.  If it is slower, that's likely to change 
eventually.


> I'm not sure what types of processes make heavy use of this cache but there
> performance is degraded by HyperThreading from what I understand.  Basically
> if it ain't written for it, it will probably run worse rather than better.