Re: about spam
Hi ML :-) I read about spamassassin here and decided to install it myself. Since I am running debian I apt-get install'ed it and did not change any config files. I just added the needed rules to my procmailrc. Well, it works, but I was wondering how a mail in this mailinglist could get a score of 4.4 and a real spam message gets 3.6. That is not very useful, because I want the spam to be filtered to +spam and therefor I have to set the filter-level to ~3.5 or something. But then the regular mailinglist-mails get filtered, too. If this is too OT let me now. We can discuss this elsewhere, but I am very interested to know how I can manage that. Bye, max -- -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 GCS d- s: a--- C++ UL+++ P+ L+++ E--- W+ N++ o++ K- w-- O- M-- V- PS+++ PE-- Y+ PGP++ t--- 5-- X+ R- tv+ b++ DI- D++ G++ e h! r y+ --END GEEK CODE BLOCK-- msg27930/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
emacs-goodies (was: Re: Emacs and line wrapping)
Hi Jussi, * Jussi Ekholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [09. Mai. 2002]: > Rob Reid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I recommend filladapt. > > Some other person recommended me filladapt, too. But the fact is, that > the GNU Emacs that comes along with my GNU/Linux distribution, doesn't > have that package by default. And I've, of course, forgot where to get > those elisip files... :-P In Debian Gnu/Linux the packages name is "emacs-goodies-el" Ciao, Gregor -- Kommunikation benoetigt gemeinsame /"\ASCII Ribbon Campaign Standards --> unformatierter Text \ /Respect for open standards in E-Mails, als Anhaenge nur offene X No HTML/RTF in email Standards, keine Micro$oft-Dateien / \No M$ Word docs in email
Re: about spam
At 2:16 PM EDT on May 9 Maximilian Szengel sent off: > I read about spamassassin here and decided to install it myself. Since > config files. I just added the needed rules to my procmailrc. Well, it > works, but I was wondering how a mail in this mailinglist could get a > score of 4.4 and a real spam message gets 3.6. It's not too offtopic since it involves this list (and just about every other list ;) I can't answer your question, because I filter all my list mail before the spamassassin check in my .procmailrc. i.e. put something like :0: * ^TOmutt@ muttin above the spamassassin part. Other people have fancy recipes that attempt to catch all mailing lists in one recipe, but that's OT. List filing before spam checking doesn't catch spam in the lists, but the lists I read don't pass on spam to the general membership. OT: 3.6 seems low for a spam. Maybe it's just a fluke, or maybe you should customize the scores on the various spamassassin tests. -- Parkinson's Law: Work expands to fill the time allotted it. Robert I. Reid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://astro.utoronto.ca/~reid/ PGP Key: http://astro.utoronto.ca/~reid/pgp.html
Re: Different colour after signature
* David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-05-09 12:47]: > Darren, et al -- > > ...and then darren chamberlain said... > % > ... > > There's the hdrpart patch, which allows for exactly that. I use it to > ... > > I don't remember where I got it, so I'll attach it. I've applied it to > > 1.3.22 and 1.3.28 without incident. > ... > > [-- Attachment #2: patch-1.3.2609.mg.hdrcolor.1.dtg.txt --] > > Since there's a dtg on it, it looks like you grabbed my tweaked version > from my cocktail site. Anyone else can get it at > > http://mutt.justpickone.org/ > > under /cocktail as they may need it. Show off. ;) (darren) -- Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence. -- Napolean Bonaparte
Re: about spam
On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 02:42:07PM -0400, Rob Reid wrote: > It's not too offtopic since it involves this list (and just about every other > list ;) Fine :-) > I can't answer your question, because I filter all my list mail before the > spamassassin check in my .procmailrc. i.e. put something like > > :0: > * ^TOmutt@ > muttin > > above the spamassassin part. Other people have fancy recipes that attempt to > catch all mailing lists in one recipe, but that's OT. Well, I actually filter my list mail before filter with SA, too. But that, indeed, does not answer my question ;-). > List filing before spam checking doesn't catch spam in the lists, but the lists > I read don't pass on spam to the general membership. Yes, you're *almost* right. > OT: 3.6 seems low for a spam. Maybe it's just a fluke, or maybe you should > customize the scores on the various spamassassin tests. I think I should customize the scores, yes. I was just wondering how come that spam gets 3.6 and regular mail gets 4.4. I think it is because the default SA scores are set to 4.3 when it detects an empty reply-to field, which is a bit high imo. I'll check that. Bye, max -- -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 GCS d- s: a--- C++ UL+++ P+ L+++ E--- W+ N++ o++ K- w-- O- M-- V- PS+++ PE-- Y+ PGP++ t--- 5-- X+ R- tv+ b++ DI- D++ G++ e h! r y+ --END GEEK CODE BLOCK-- msg27934/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: ailasing mailboxes
On May 07, Dan Boger [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > Is it possible to alias a mailbox? I often need to save messages to a > remote IMAP box... Michael Elkins wrote a patch to do just this... it was linked off his site at www.sigpipe.org, but that site doesn't seem to exist at the moment. You could probably find it in the list archives. I may have a copy somewhere, I can look for it later if you can't find it. msg27935/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: ailasing mailboxes
Jeremy Blosser wrote: > On May 07, Dan Boger [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > > Is it possible to alias a mailbox? I often need to save messages to a > > remote IMAP box... > > Michael Elkins wrote a patch to do just this... it was linked off his site > at www.sigpipe.org, but that site doesn't seem to exist at the moment. > > You could probably find it in the list archives. I may have a copy > somewhere, I can look for it later if you can't find it. i think most of the same stuff is at: http://www.cs.hmc.edu/~me/ -- Will Yardley input: william < @ hq . newdream . net . >
Re: emacs-goodies
* Gregor Zattler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-05-09 20.12 +0200]: > Hi Jussi, > * Jussi Ekholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [09. Mai. 2002]: > > Rob Reid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I recommend filladapt. > > > > Some other person recommended me filladapt, too. But the fact is, that > > the GNU Emacs that comes along with my GNU/Linux distribution, doesn't > > have that package by default. And I've, of course, forgot where to get > > those elisip files... :-P > > In Debian Gnu/Linux the packages name is "emacs-goodies-el" In case anyone is looking, the URL is: http://www.wonderworks.com/download/filladapt.el A good starting-point when looking for emacs stuff is: http://anc.ed.ac.uk/~stephen/emacs/ell.html HAND -- Martin Karlsson - 0x9C924660 msg27937/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [OT] Emacs and line wrapping (was: Re: About wrapping lines.)
On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 12:09:13PM +0300, Jussi Ekholm wrote: > Yeah, I learnt that already. :-) Now I can use M-q nicely and it does > *just* what I want it to do, so now faar too long lines aren't a > problem for me. Of course, it would be nice if Emacs would wrap 'em > automagicly, but I think I'm not asking for everything and be happy with > the bread crums I already have. O:-) Here's one way to go into auto-fill mode whenever you fire up emacs from mutt. It goes into mail-mode (a major mode like text mode, but with a few more features designed for working with email). It also creates a hook for mail-mode that goes into auto-fill-mode and skips past all the headers (useful if you set edit_headers in your .muttrc). ;; Automatically go into mail-mode and auto-fill-mode if filename starts with ;; /tmp/mutt (setq auto-mode-alist (append (list (cons "^\/tmp\/mutt" 'mail-mode)) auto-mode-alist)) (add-hook 'mail-mode-hook 'my-mail-mode-hook) (defun my-mail-mode-hook () (auto-fill-mode) (mail-text) ) msg27938/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
header patterns
why does this work: color index red default ~h"^X-Spam-Flag" but not this: color index red default ~h"^X-Spam-Flag: YES" i get: Error in /home/suppmbox/.muttrc, line 20: error in pattern at: YES i've tried different combinations of quoting and escaping stuff, but it still gives an error. this is with mutt 1.2.5i on debian Linux 2.2 -- Will Yardley input: william < @ hq . newdream . net . >
Re: header patterns
* On Thu, 09 May 2002, Will Yardley wrote: > why does this work: > color index red default ~h"^X-Spam-Flag" > > but not this: > color index red default ~h"^X-Spam-Flag: YES" I think the quoting is wrong and there's no error with the first one because there aren't any spaces in the expression. This should work: color index red default '~h "^X-Spam-Flag: YES"' -- John
