On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 02:42:07PM -0400, Rob Reid wrote: > It's not too offtopic since it involves this list (and just about every other > list ;)
Fine :-) > I can't answer your question, because I filter all my list mail before the > spamassassin check in my .procmailrc. i.e. put something like > > :0: > * ^TOmutt@ > muttin > > above the spamassassin part. Other people have fancy recipes that attempt to > catch all mailing lists in one recipe, but that's OT. Well, I actually filter my list mail before filter with SA, too. But that, indeed, does not answer my question ;-). > List filing before spam checking doesn't catch spam in the lists, but the lists > I read don't pass on spam to the general membership. Yes, you're *almost* right. > OT: 3.6 seems low for a spam. Maybe it's just a fluke, or maybe you should > customize the scores on the various spamassassin tests. I think I should customize the scores, yes. I was just wondering how come that spam gets 3.6 and regular mail gets 4.4. I think it is because the default SA scores are set to 4.3 when it detects an empty reply-to field, which is a bit high imo. I'll check that. Bye, max -- -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12 GCS d- s: a--- C++ UL+++ P+ L+++ E--- W+ N++ o++ K- w-- O- M-- V- PS+++ PE-- Y+ PGP++ t--- 5-- X+ R- tv+ b++ DI- D++ G++ e h! r y+ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
msg27934/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
