How to send mail to groups of recipients?

[Erwin Kaiser]

My question is wether there is a feature in mutt to allow this.
TIA Erwin

Re: OT: replace POP3 with IMAP directly

[Cliff Sarginson]

On Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 08:10:37AM +0800, Rino Mardo wrote:
> hi. a little OT here i'm wondering what are the requirements to replace
> POP3 with IMAP?  in my fetchmail i download emails using POP3.  now i've
> learned that IMAP doesn't require the user to do POP-before-SMTP hence
> with that i don't have to check for emails before being able to send out
> emails.
> 
> is this just a straight-forward replace of the keyword?
> 
I doubt it. They are totally different protocols.
Firstly does your ISP support IMAP ?
remember that IMAP leaves your mail on the server, many ISP's
won't like that !
I download my mail using SMTP (via Postfix), but I am fortunate that I have
an ISP that supports that -- few do. I have no POP or IMAP software
running.

-- 
Regards
Cliff

Sending an email as follows will get you my public gpg key...

To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: send public key


 PGP signature

Re: How to send mail to groups of recipients?

[Suresh Ramasubramanian]

Erwin Kaiser  [12/09/01 10:10 +0200]:
> My question is wether there is a feature in mutt to allow this.

Aliases - better create them in sendmail though.

-suresh

Re: How to send mail to groups of recipients?

[Cliff Sarginson]

On Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 10:10:29AM +0200, Erwin Kaiser wrote:
> My question is wether there is a feature in mutt to allow this.
> TIA Erwin

alias will do it...
e.g.
alias mylist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Will allow you to use "mylist" as a To address..

-- 
Regards
Cliff

Sending an email as follows will get you my public gpg key...

To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: send public key


 PGP signature

Re: My first macro..not quite doing what I want

[Cliff Sarginson]

On Tue, Sep 11, 2001 at 08:58:19PM -0400, Jim Toth wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2001 at 03:15:07PM +0200, Cliff Sarginson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) 
>said:
> > Hello,
> > A common sequence for me when reading new messages is to delete then
> > move to the next new message. My macro is as follows:
> > 
> > macro index  d "Delete then go to next new msg"
> > 
> > Unfortunately when you delete a new message the pointer goes to
> > the next message in the index, so if you have 3 new messages in
> > a row,  the first one, it jumps to the 3rd one.
> > Can I fix this ?
> 
> Try changing the "resolve" variable.
> 
> Something like
> 
>  macro index  "set noresolve;d;set resolve" "Delete then go to next new 
>msg"
> 
> (untested)
> 
Afraid that does not work it interprets the 's' in the first "set" as a save command.

> I usually, before reading new messages, limit to new messages with the 
> ~N tag (see patterns in the mutt manual).

How will that help with delete command problem I am trying to solve ?
Thanks anyway !

-- 
Regards
Cliff

Sending an email as follows will get you my public gpg key...

To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: send public key


 PGP signature

Re: My first macro..not quite doing what I want

[Cliff Sarginson]

On Tue, Sep 11, 2001 at 08:58:19PM -0400, Jim Toth wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2001 at 03:15:07PM +0200, Cliff Sarginson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) 
>said:
> > Hello,
> > A common sequence for me when reading new messages is to delete then
> > move to the next new message. My macro is as follows:
> > 
> > macro index  d "Delete then go to next new msg"
> > 
> > Unfortunately when you delete a new message the pointer goes to
> > the next message in the index, so if you have 3 new messages in
> > a row,  the first one, it jumps to the 3rd one.
> > Can I fix this ?
> 
> Try changing the "resolve" variable.
> 
> Something like
> 
>  macro index  "set noresolve;d;set resolve" "Delete then go to next new 
>msg"
> 
> (untested)
> 
> I usually, before reading new messages, limit to new messages with the 
> ~N tag (see patterns in the mutt manual).

I should explain, I like to see the thread a N message is in, so I do not
want to just limit to new messages alone...

-- 
Regards
Cliff

Sending an email as follows will get you my public gpg key...

To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: send public key


 PGP signature

Re: easy question... :)

[David]

On Tue, 11 Sep 2001, Matthias LOITSCH wrote:
> how can i filter my messages so that, for example, all mails from
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] get into a specific mailbox when they arrive?
> 

I'd recommend maildrop...

http://www.flounder.net/~mrsam/maildrop/
http://www.courier-mta.org/download.php#maildrop

-- 
Don't tell me I'm burning the candle at both ends -- tell me where to
get more wax!!
-
David Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | David Clarke 
GPG Fingerprint :  869B 53DD 5E80 E1F0 93F6  9871 0508 0296 5957 F723

 PGP signature

mutt & exchange

[Johannes Zellner]

Hi,

how do I use mutt with an EXCHANGE server ?
Actually I can already READ mail by having

set imap_user=""
set imap_pass=""
set imap_checkinterval="30"
# bind index "\Ca" 'imap-fetch-mail'

set folder={EXCHANGE}
set spoolfile={EXCHANGE}INBOX


but if I try to SEND mail, it tells me
Error 127 .. Exec error.

I'm using mutt as it comes with the latest cygwin on win2000.

If someone has any EXCHANGE related tips, please share them with me!
(Using mutt / UNIX since quite a while, my job forces me now to
work on this OS-wannabe).

-- 
   Johannes

Re: mutt & exchange

[Suresh Ramasubramanian]

Johannes Zellner  [12/09/01 12:04 +0200]:
> how do I use mutt with an EXCHANGE server ?
> Actually I can already READ mail by having
> set imap_user=""
> set imap_pass=""

> but if I try to SEND mail, it tells me
> Error 127 .. Exec error.
 
Mutt doesn't have a builtin smtp client of any kind.  See if you can compile
Masqmail / Nullmailer on cygwin (or download Mercury from
http://www.pmail.com) and config that to smarthost through your exchange box
(or if you have a NAT'ted connection to the 'net, use mercury to send direct
to MX)

> If someone has any EXCHANGE related tips, please share them with me!
> (Using mutt / UNIX since quite a while, my job forces me now to
> work on this OS-wannabe).

Poor you :)

-suresh

send-hook, folder-hook

[Peter Lavender]

Hi everyone,

I thought I had this working, but seems that I have broken something,
and I'm not sure I'm using send and folder-hook correctly.

What I need to have happen is that my .sig changes, my From address is
correct (which it is) and the reply-to: header is correct, and remove
the vanitity headers.

Thanks...

=
# Setup the rest as defaults.
folder-hook .set signature=~/.signature

folder-hook .unmy_hdr *
folder-hook .my_hdr From: Peter Lavender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

send-hook   .my_hdr X-Operating-System: Linux/`uname -r` (`uname
-m`)
send-hook   .my_hdr X-Uptime: \`uptime\`

# Maxware config
folder-hook "maxware" unmy_hdr *
folder-hook "maxware" set sort=reverse-date-received

#folder-hook "maxware" reply-to=
folder-hook "maxware" my_hdr From: Peter Lavender
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
folder-hook "maxware" my_hdr Organization:MaXware Australia

#send-hook "maxware" unmy_hdr X-Operating-System: Linux/`uname -r`
(`uname -m`)
#send-hook "maxware" unmy_hdr X-Uptime: \`uptime\`
folder-hook "maxware" set signature=~/mail/maxware.sig

fcc-hook "maxware" ~/mail/maxware-sent


Regards,

Pete.

-- 
Due to a lack of imagination, 
this signature will remain 
under construction indefinately.

Re: mutt & exchange

[Magnus Stenman]

Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> 
> Johannes Zellner  [12/09/01 12:04 +0200]:
> > how do I use mutt with an EXCHANGE server ?
> > Actually I can already READ mail by having
> > set imap_user=""
> > set imap_pass=""
> 
> > but if I try to SEND mail, it tells me
> > Error 127 .. Exec error.
> 
> Mutt doesn't have a builtin smtp client of any kind.  See if you can compile
> Masqmail / Nullmailer on cygwin (or download Mercury from
> http://www.pmail.com) and config that to smarthost through your exchange box
> (or if you have a NAT'ted connection to the 'net, use mercury to send direct
> to MX)

Another good reason to include SMTP capabilities into mutt.

/m

> 
> > If someone has any EXCHANGE related tips, please share them with me!
> > (Using mutt / UNIX since quite a while, my job forces me now to
> > work on this OS-wannabe).
> 
> Poor you :)
> 
> -suresh

Re: mutt & exchange

[Lars Hecking]

> Another good reason to include SMTP capabilities into mutt.

 They don't belong there. Check the archives, this has been discussed
 to death already.

send-hook, folder-hook??

[Peter Lavender]

Hi everyone

I have a folder that I have procmail chuck all email for my company's
address into.  When I send from this folder though, I want to get rid
of the "vanity" headers (X-Operating-System and X-Uptime), but it
doesn't work.

Here's what i have:

# Setup the defaults.
folder-hook .set signature=~/.signature

folder-hook .unmy_hdr *
folder-hook .my_hdr From: Peter Lavender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
send-hook   .my_hdr X-Operating-System: Linux/`uname -r` (`uname
-m`)
send-hook   .my_hdr X-Uptime: \`uptime\`

# Maxware config
folder-hook "maxware" unmy_hdr *
folder-hook "maxware" set sort=reverse-date-received

#folder-hook "maxware" reply-to=
folder-hook "maxware" my_hdr From: Peter Lavender
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
folder-hook "maxware" my_hdr Organization:MaXware Australia

send-hook "maxware" unmy_hdr X-Operating-System: Linux/`uname -r`
(`uname -m`)
send-hook "maxware" unmy_hdr X-Uptime: \`uptime\`
folder-hook "maxware" set signature=~/mail/maxware.sig

fcc-hook "maxware" ~/mail/maxware-sent

The wraping is a result of the setup in vim.

Thanks in advance...

Regards,

Pete.

-- 
Due to a lack of imagination, 
this signature will remain 
under construction indefinately.

Re: nfrm/frm in mutt ?

[darren chamberlain]

Paul de Weerd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said something to this effect on 09/11/2001:
> I recently switched to using Mutt for all my mail. Sure do like
> it ! But I do miss some tools I had back when using ELM, namely
> frm and nfrm. frm listed all mails in a specified mailbox (or
> $MAIL if none was specified) and nfrm listed all new mails (I
> think nfrm was a specialized form of frm, but I'm not sure).

I never used nfrm, but I missed frm when I moved to a machine
without elm installed.  I use a shell function as a frm
replacement (only works on mbox files, naturally).  

frm () {
  mbox=$1
  if test -z $mbox; then mbox=$MAIL; fi
  egrep '^From ' $mbox 
}

This is off the top of my head.  You'll probably need to tweak
it.   Add some fanciness using awk on the last line.

(darren)

-- 
Fanaticism consists in redoubling your efforts when you have forgotten
your aim.
-- George Santayana

Fix for PGP copyright thing...

[Jean-Sebastien Morisset]

I don't know about you guys, but I got tired of PGP's (version 6.5.8)
copyright message. Here's a little script I wrote called
'pgp-no-copyright':

---BEGIN---
#!/bin/sh

PGP_ERR="/tmp/pgperr.$$"
PGP_OUT="/tmp/pgpout.$$"
PGP_EXIT="0"

pgp $* 2>$PGP_ERR 1>$PGP_OUT
PGP_EXIT="$?"

egrep -v '^(Pretty Good Privacy\(tm\) Version |\(c\) 1999 Network Associates Inc.|Uses 
the RSAREF\(tm\) Toolkit, which is copyright RSA Data Security, Inc\.|Export of this 
software may be restricted by the U\.S\. government\.|$)' $PGP_ERR >/dev/stderr
cat $PGP_OUT >/dev/stdout

rm -f $PGP_ERR $PGP_OUT
exit $PGP_EXIT
---END---

Just replace all "pgp" commands in your .muttrc with "pgp-no-copyright".

LateR!
js.
-- 
Jean-Sebastien Morisset, Sr. UNIX Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Personal Homepage 
This is Linux Country. On a quiet night you can hear Windows NT reboot!
 please pgp encrypt all correspondence 

 PGP signature

Outlook patch...

[Jean-Sebastien Morisset]

I've read about the 'outlook patch' in a few messages, but haven't been
able to find it anywhere. Can someone point me to a URL with the patch for
mutt v1.2.5?

Thanks,
js.
-- 
Jean-Sebastien Morisset, Sr. UNIX Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Personal Homepage 
This is Linux Country. On a quiet night you can hear Windows NT reboot!
 please pgp encrypt all correspondence 

 PGP signature

Re: Fix for PGP copyright thing...

[Christoph Maurer]

Am Mit, 12 Sep 2001, schrieb Jean-Sebastien Morisset:

> I don't know about you guys, but I got tired of PGP's (version 6.5.8)
> copyright message. Here's a little script I wrote called

I got tired of using non-free-software. Therefore I use GnuPG.

Christoph

-- 
Christoph Maurer - Paul-Röntgen-Straße 7 - D - 52072 Aachen
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.christophmaurer.de
On my Homepage: SuSE 7.0 on an Acer Travelmate 508 T Notebook

 PGP signature

Operations on tagged messages

[Cliff Sarginson]

Hello
I have a question about tags.
How can I save all tagged messages in one fell swoop ?
As a corollary to that how can I save a thread in one fell swoop?
What operations can I do on messages marked as important, for example
I may want to mark messages as important that require some action
from me, I would like to save these to a folder I call "action".
Any clues.

p.s. The more I increase my expertise with mutt the more I like it!
I can process mail much quicker than I can in kmail, which I have more
or less stopped using.

-- 
Regards
Cliff

Sending an email as follows will get you my public gpg key...

To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: send public key


 PGP signature

Re: My first macro..not quite doing what I want

[Byrial Jensen]

On Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 10:54:53 +0200, Cliff Sarginson wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2001 at 08:58:19PM -0400, Jim Toth wrote:
> > Try changing the "resolve" variable.
> > 
> > Something like
> > 
> >  macro index  "set noresolve;d;set resolve" "Delete then go to next new 
>msg"
> > 
> > (untested)
> > 
> Afraid that does not work

No, but the idea was good. Try this one instead:

macro index  ":set noresolved:set resolve" "Delete then go to 
next new msg"

Re: Operations on tagged messages

[Suresh Ramasubramanian]

Cliff Sarginson  [12/09/01 17:03 +0200]:
> How can I save all tagged messages in one fell swoop ?

;s =folder
; = "Apply operation to all tagged messages"

> As a corollary to that how can I save a thread in one fell swoop?

Tag the thread

> What operations can I do on messages marked as important, for example
> I may want to mark messages as important that require some action

You can flag them, and use hooks

--suresh

esc t ..why doesn't work when a message is displayed?

[Cliff Sarginson]

Hello
The t toggle thread tagging only works when only the index
is displayed, not if you have the index above and a message
below in the screen.
Is there a reason for this ?
Seems a bit odd.

-- 
Regards
Cliff

Sending an email as follows will get you my public gpg key...

To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: send public key


 PGP signature

Re: My first macro..not quite doing what I want

[Cliff Sarginson]

On Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 05:25:32PM +0200, Byrial Jensen wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 10:54:53 +0200, Cliff Sarginson wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 11, 2001 at 08:58:19PM -0400, Jim Toth wrote:
> > > Try changing the "resolve" variable.
> > > 
> > > Something like
> > > 
> > >  macro index  "set noresolve;d;set resolve" "Delete then go to next 
>new msg"
> > > 
> > > (untested)
> > > 
> > Afraid that does not work
> 
> No, but the idea was good. Try this one instead:
> 
> macro index  ":set noresolved:set resolve" "Delete then go 
>to next new msg"
Bingo !
Thanks..
-- 
Regards
Cliff

Sending an email as follows will get you my public gpg key...

To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: send public key


 PGP signature

"serial mail"

[Matthias LOITSCH]

just another question :)

i want to send a mail to many persons, but they shouldnt see that they mail is
not sent only to them.
with the Bcc i have to specify a To Adress... 

quite the same question : can i change one word in each mail ?
for example :   "hello name1"
"hello name2"
...

i dont want to use it for span mails!!! :)


.


-- 
> Matthias Loitsch >>>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> quoted >>>
>>> www.yourth.net >>>

Mail-Followup-To ...

[Matthias LOITSCH]

i just did not understand the mail-follow-up function...
and i dont see the connection with the 'subscribe ...' command.

what is the difference between : 'subscribe ...' and 'lists ...' ??


.


-- 
   Matthias Loitsch
 O-- -- -  - [EMAIL PROTECTED] -  - -- --> @
www.yourth.net  : against html mail

[OT] Content-Disposition: inline?

[Justin R. Miller]

I've looked around a bit on several mailing list archives, but I can't
seem to figure out what's causing this specific problem, though I think
I've narrowed it down.  Any help would be appreciated.  I doubt it's a
Mutt problem, but I'd like to learn what the deal is either way and this
list has the kind of people who tend to know this stuff :->

I send my mail with Mutt and I always sign it with GnuPG.  That results
in the message going out as two (or more) parts -- the message, and the
signature.  Both have a 'Content-Disposition: inline' header, which I
take it means that the MUA is supposed to display the attachment inline,
since both are of type text/plain.  

Anyway, I just got a mail from a user on a rather low-tech mailing list
complaining that all of my mail comes up blank with two attachments --
the two parts mentioned above.  She's using:

X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.3018.1300

I'll bet my life savings on which one of us has the real problem :-D
Regardless, I was wondering if anyone would be able to confirm for me
what exactly that is?  

Thanks in advance!  

-- 
| Justin R. Miller / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 0xC9C40C31
| Of all the things I've lost, I miss my pants the most.
--

 PGP signature

Re: "serial mail"

[Vineet Kumar]

* Matthias LOITSCH ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [010912 13:49]:
> just another question :)
> 
> i want to send a mail to many persons, but they shouldnt see that they mail is
> not sent only to them.
> with the Bcc i have to specify a To Adress... 
> 
> quite the same question : can i change one word in each mail ?
> for example : "hello name1"
>   "hello name2"
>   ...

create a file called recipients that looks like this:

Alice:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bob:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Eve:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

and your message in a file called message with __NAME__ where you want
to use the person's name.

Then do this in bash:


for recip in `cat recipients` ; do
  NAME=$(echo $recip | cut -d: -f 1)
  ADDR=$(echo $recip | cut -d: -f 2)
  cat message | sed -e "s/__NAME__/$NAME/g" | mail $ADDR
done

> i dont want to use it for span mails!!! :)

You'd better not!!!

-- 
Vineet   http://www.anti-dmca.org
Unauthorized use of this .sig may constitute violation of US law.
echo Qba\'g gernq ba zr\! |tr 'a-zA-Z' 'n-za-mN-ZA-M'

 PGP signature

Re: Mail-Followup-To ...

[Vineet Kumar]

* Matthias LOITSCH ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [010912 14:41]:
> i just did not understand the mail-follow-up function...
> and i dont see the connection with the 'subscribe ...' command.
> 
> what is the difference between : 'subscribe ...' and 'lists ...' ??

Mail-Followup-To is a header that helps it so that people subscribed to
mailing lists and people not subscribed to mailing lists can get
appropriate replies sent to appropriate places.

Here's the way it works, in the form of a couple of user examples:

I'm subscribed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I post a message there. Since
I've told mutt 'subscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]' it knows that I'm
subscribed to that list and generates the following header:

Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

This makes it so that people with compatible mailers can jsut hit
"reply" and the right thing will happen: the reply goes to the list.
Since I'm subscribed, I don't need to be CC'ed -- that would result in a
duplicate email.

Now another case: I'm not subscribed to [EMAIL PROTECTED], but I want to
ask a question there. I post a message, and since I've told mutt 'lists
[EMAIL PROTECTED]' it knows that this is a list to which I am not
subscribed. It generates the following header:

Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]

So that when people with compatible mailers hit reply, their mailer CCs
me and I get a copy in addition to the one sent to the list.

Third case (less interesting). I send a message to my friend bob, whose
address is listed in neither the 'lists' statment nor the 'subscribe'
statement. Mutt generates no extra header; the message is sent as-is,
without a Mail-Followup-To header.

I hope these examples clear up the issue for you.


-- 
Vineet   http://www.anti-dmca.org
Unauthorized use of this .sig may constitute violation of US law.
echo Qba\'g gernq ba zr\! |tr 'a-zA-Z' 'n-za-mN-ZA-M'

 PGP signature

Re: mutt & exchange

[Magnus Stenman]

Lars Hecking wrote:
> 
> > Another good reason to include SMTP capabilities into mutt.
> 
>  They don't belong there. Check the archives, this has been discussed
>  to death already.

I know, and the arguments usually go along the lines of
"Mutt is a MUA, not a MTA".

This was a comment related to this never ending discussion;

if you run cygwin (and since mutt now is in cygwin more people will)
you might not be able to get ssmtp or similar running.


/magnus

Re: mutt & exchange

[Suresh Ramasubramanian]

Magnus Stenman  [13/09/01 03:01 +0200]:
> if you run cygwin (and since mutt now is in cygwin more people will)
> you might not be able to get ssmtp or similar running.

So download a simple mail proxy like Mercury from http://www.pmail.com
For a doze software it works quite well.  Far better than IIS at any rate.

-suresh

Re: [OT] Content-Disposition: inline?

[Christoph Maurer]

Am Mit, 12 Sep 2001, schrieb Justin R. Miller:

> I send my mail with Mutt and I always sign it with GnuPG.  That results
> in the message going out as two (or more) parts -- the message, and the
> signature.  Both have a 'Content-Disposition: inline' header, which I
> take it means that the MUA is supposed to display the attachment inline,
> since both are of type text/plain.  
> 
> Anyway, I just got a mail from a user on a rather low-tech mailing list
> complaining that all of my mail comes up blank with two attachments --
> the two parts mentioned above.  She's using:
> 
>   X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.3018.1300
> 
> I'll bet my life savings on which one of us has the real problem :-D
> Regardless, I was wondering if anyone would be able to confirm for me
> what exactly that is?  
> 

Well you are right. She's the one with a non RFC-compatible mailer.
But this won't help you as most of the people round there are using
exactly this MUA.

By default Mutt uses PGP/MIME for signing and encrypting Messages as
described in RFC 1847. But most of the windows mailers (alle except
Eudora I think) cannot deal with PGP/Mime, so they will get an empty
message with two attachments. If you save these attachments to a
file, you'll be able to check the signature and read them using some
functions of PGP's GUI, but this means much effort.

What are possible solutions to this problem:

 - If you know, what MUA the person you are in contact with is
   using, you can use the old-style PGP format that is understood
   e.g. by MS OE. I defined some macros in my muttrc to do so

   macro compose S "Fgpg  --clearsig=on\nj^T^Utext/plain; format=text; x-action=sign\n"
   macro compose E "Fgpg -a -e -s\nj^T^Utext/plain; format=text; x-action=encrypt\n"

 - And messages to mailing lists I do not sign or encrypt normally.
   Signing is not as useful there as in private or business
   communication and you can reduce the size of your messages and
   also avoid trouble

Christoph


-- 
Christoph Maurer - Paul-Röntgen-Straße 7 - D - 52072 Aachen
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.christophmaurer.de
On my Homepage: SuSE 7.0 on an Acer Travelmate 508 T Notebook

Re: send public key

[Cliff Sarginson]

-BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
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=HNB5
-END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-