Re: mutt & exchange

[Magnus Stenman]

Lars Hecking wrote:
> 
> > Another good reason to include SMTP capabilities into mutt.
> 
>  They don't belong there. Check the archives, this has been discussed
>  to death already.

I know, and the arguments usually go along the lines of
"Mutt is a MUA, not a MTA".

This was a comment related to this never ending discussion;

if you run cygwin (and since mutt now is in cygwin more people will)
you might not be able to get ssmtp or similar running.


/magnus