Lars Hecking wrote: > > > Another good reason to include SMTP capabilities into mutt. > > They don't belong there. Check the archives, this has been discussed > to death already. I know, and the arguments usually go along the lines of "Mutt is a MUA, not a MTA". This was a comment related to this never ending discussion; if you run cygwin (and since mutt now is in cygwin more people will) you might not be able to get ssmtp or similar running. /magnus
- mutt & exchange Johannes Zellner
- Re: mutt & exchange Suresh Ramasubramanian
- Re: mutt & exchange Magnus Stenman
- Re: mutt & exchange Lars Hecking
- Re: mutt & exchange Magnus Stenman
- Re: mutt & exchange Suresh Ramasubramanian
- Re: mutt & exchange Piet Delport
- Re: mutt & exchange Suresh Ramasubramanian
- Re: mutt & exchange Johannes Zellner
- Re: mutt & exchange Vineet Kumar
- Re: mutt & exchange Johannes Zellner