Re: [ot] .exrc control-key mapping
On 2000-10-18 19:39:58 -0700, Mike E wrote: > I've been trying to bind ^j to `!}fmt` in vi(m) for a while now with > no sucess; anyone know how? ^j is the same thing as a newline. To the best of my knowledge, vi doesn't distinguish betwenn the two. That is, you are about to bind the return key on your keyboard to !}fmt... Since you seem to be used to pico, I'd suggest you go for emacs or one of its smaller non-lisp cousins such as jove, joe, or jed (the one I'd recommend). The use of these programs won't be entirely new to you. However, you'll have to get used to the fact that ^j and ^c won't have the pine meanings in any of these programs. -- Thomas Roessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Re: GnuPG autosign how
On Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 11:10:11AM -0400 or thereabouts, David T-G wrote: > > % > % gnupg: [options] > % > % at the bottom of the screen after giving my passphrase and it won't be sent > % unless I disable "sign". > > Aha -- this sounds like there is a problem with your gpg invocation. > Would you care to post your gpg.rc file and/or relevant sections of > muttrc for review? > gpg.rc? i only have ~/.gnupg with my keys in them -- Who's watching the watchmen? Key fingerprint = E619 726E 3815 7A48 EAC7 E49F DF93 4E33 B069 0883
Using mutt and pgp without asking for passphrase ?
I'm setting the passphrase via the PGPPASS environment variable before starting mutt. Wenn I open a pgp encrypted message mutt still asks me for the passphrase. This is not necessary, because pgp looks automatically for the PGPPASS environment variable. So, how do I disable this function in mutt? Daniel.
Re: spamfilter for procmail
On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 04:09:05PM -0700, Michael Elkins wrote: > I'll just add my $0.02US to this and agree with Bruce's example. After > spending lots of time trying to weed out spammers, I found the most > effective filter was to simple accept all known addresses and everything > else goes into a spam folder. Nearly all the spam I receive is not > addressed to me or one of the mailing lists I subscribe to. You just have > to remember to read your spam folder every once in a while. I actually have > a +spam at the end of my `mailboxes' line in my .muttrc to remind me I have > mail waiting there. > > me I use the exact same procedure with the added benefit of automatically accepting email from anyone in my company since so many of them bcc me or use an alias that is not expanded. I simply use a rule that accepts all mail from my domain. It works wonders. /Duncan -- Duncan Watson System Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] nCUBE - Beaverton [For best reading adjust your window width to the length of this line -djw] 123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345
mutt-1.2.5i, PGP 6.5.8, Anybody have both these working together? (pkspxycwrap?)
I'm running mutt-1.2.5i that I installed as an RPM on RH 6.2. I am trying to get it working with PGP 6.5.8. I've sourced the pgp6.rc from the mutt-1.2.5/contrib directory. I made a link from /usr/bin/pgp to /usr/bin/pgp6. I'm able to decrypt mails sent to me after making the appropriate change to my .procmailrc. The first problem I have come across is when I try to encrypt a file to someone. After I say "y" to send there is a quick messaage Looking for keys matching ""... and them I am asked: "EnterkeyID for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:" who exists in my pubring.pkr. I enter the keyID ( 0xfoo ) but it just keeps asking me for it? Where do I go from here? The only thing that I suspect may be wrong is the last line in the pgp6.rc file pgp6.rc snipp>> set pgp_getkeys_command="pkspxycwrap %r" I've seen several posting concerning "pkspxycwrap" but nothing that makes any sense to me. Is is a typo? Is there a space missing? I tried making it "pkspxyc wrap %r" but it didn't seem to improve anything. I've even installed pkspxy-0.5 but that didn't seem to make a difference? I've read I think all there is to read concerning mutt and PGP but nothing seems to be relevant to this problem. Thanks in advance for any help. Cheers, Rod
draft message timeout
I notice that mutt has a `timeout' feature: if I've started typing in a To: or Subject: line and then get distracted and don't get back to it for a few minutes, mutt clears the line and waits for me to start over. Can this timeout delay be altered in .muttrc? TIA/x
Re: draft message timeout
On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 11:34:16AM -0500, the/eXtreme wrote: > I notice that mutt has a `timeout' feature: if I've started > typing in a To: or Subject: line and then get distracted and > don't get back to it for a few minutes, mutt clears the line > and waits for me to start over. Can this timeout delay be > altered in .muttrc? The timeout should not affect those prompts. Are you perhaps using an older version of Solaris? On some systems it is impossible to disable the timeout after it is once set. me
Re: draft message timeout
-: The timeout should not affect those prompts. Are you perhaps using an older -: version of Solaris? On some systems it is impossible to disable the timeout -: after it is once set. This is with mutt 1.2.5 and SunOS 5.7 (Solaris 2.7). If mutt isn't responsible for the timeout, I'll go pester our sysadmin.
Re: draft message timeout
On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 01:34:13PM -0500, the/eXtreme wrote: > This is with mutt 1.2.5 and SunOS 5.7 (Solaris 2.7). > If mutt isn't responsible for the timeout, I'll go > pester our sysadmin. I would suggest compiling either with ncurses or slang. I believe that will fix your problem. me
Re: spamfilter for procmail
On Wed, Oct 18, 2000 at 05:33:05PM -0700, Duncan Watson wrote: > I use the exact same procedure with the added benefit of automatically > accepting email from anyone in my company since so many of them bcc me or > use an alias that is not expanded. I simply use a rule that accepts all > mail from my domain. Try http://www.spambouncer.org/ . I haven't actually gotten around to installing it, but I've heard it works wonders. -- Daniel J. Peng /"\ Harry Browne, Libertarian \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign for President! X Against Outlook & HTML Mail http://www.harrybrowne.org/ / \ http://www.thebackrow.net/ Pelorat sighed. "I will never understand people." "There's nothing to it. All you have to do is take a close look at yourself and you will understand everyone else. How would Seldon have worked out his Plan -- and I don't care how subtle his mathematics was -- if he didn't understand people; and how could he have done that if people weren't easy to understand? You show me someone who can't understand people and I'll show you someone who has built up a false image of himself -- no offense intended." -- Asimov, "Foundation's Edge"
