Re: Hiring for boredom and profit. I need help copying parts.
You may also find me on #lilypond as deselby. -- Ezequiel Birman ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: DiceWaltz-1.2
Hi Martin,
You wrote:-
+++
I have updated/re-written my Python implementation of Mozart's Musical
Dice Game
http://imslp.org/wiki/Musikalisches_W%C3%BCrfelspiel,_K.516f_%28Mozart,_Wolfgang_Amadeus%29
+++
I found the program DiceWaltz interesting and amusing. Many thanks!
However, when I open the generated file in Frescobaldi and run it, to
produce the pdf and midi files, Frescobaldi produces the following error
message:-
+++
Parsing.../usr/local/lilypond/usr/share/lilypond/current/ly/articulate.ly:446:13:
In procedure map in expression (map (lambda # #)):
/usr/local/lilypond/usr/share/lilypond/current/ly/articulate.ly:446:13:
Wrong number of arguments to #
Exited with return code 1.
+++
Commenting out the references to articulate.ly in the generated file
cause the error message to go away.
If I make a simple musical example including articulate.ly there is no
problem.
Can you cast any light on this strange behaviour?
Regards
Bill
Here follows an example with the 'simple' bit commented out...
\version "2.17.0"
\pointAndClickOff
\include "articulate.ly"
\header {
dedication = "Musikalisches Würfelspiel K.V. Anhang 294d (516f), Wien
1778"
title = "WALZER"
composer = \markup {\epsfile #X #20 #"signature.eps"}
copyright = "Auto-created using DiceWaltz 1.2 (20130327)"
}
\paper {
#(set-paper-size "a4")
top-margin = 2\cm
}
%DICE: 9, 10, 4, 7, 5, 4, 8, 7, 6, 7, 5, 10, 6, 6, 5, 6
%TABLE DE MUSIQUE: 119, 142, 158, 167, 161, 55, 21, 91, 25, 71, 7, 82,
76, 136, 52, 93
DiceWaltz = {
\new PianoStaff <<
\new Staff = "RH acoustic grand" {\clef treble \time 3/8
\key c \major \tempo 4. = 45
%beginning of rh music
% { a8 b c } }
%%{
\repeat volta 2 {
e''16 c'' g'' e'' c''' g'' |
c''8 g' e'' |
b'8 d''16 b' a' g' |
c''8 c''16 d'' e''8 |
8 |
g''8 b'' d'' |
c''16 e'' g'' d'' a' fis'' |
}
\alternative {
{ 4 r8 } { 4 r8 }
}
\repeat volta 2 {
d'16 fis' a' d'' fis'' a'' |
g''16 b'' d''' b'' g''8 |
e''16 c'' e'' g'' c''' g'' |
d''16[ b' g'8] g'' |
c'''16 b'' c''' g'' e'' c'' |
c'''16 b'' c''' g'' e'' c'' |
d''16( cis'') d'' f'' g' b' |
c''4 r8 |
}
} % end of right hand %}
\new Staff = "LH acoustic grand" {
\clef bass \time 3/8 \key c \major
%beginning of lh music
% { a8 b c } }
%%{
{ \repeat volta 2 {
4 r8 |
4 r8 |
g,4 r8 |
4 r8 |
c8 c c |
4 r8 |
c8 d d, |
}
\alternative {
{ g,8 g16 f! e d } { g,8 b16 g fis e }
}
\repeat volta 2 {
d4 c8 |
4 8 |
4 r8 |
4 8 |
4 8 |
4 r8 |
f4 g8 |
c8 g, c, |
}
} %end of lh music
} %end of left hand %}
>>
}
\score {
% \articulate
<<
\DiceWaltz >>
\layout { }
}
%%{
\score {
\unfoldRepeats
\articulate
<<
\DiceWaltz
>>
\midi {%\tempo 8=150}
}
}
%}
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Hiring for boredom and profit. I need help copying parts.
Just to clarify, you'd have to copy only from the parts not the reduction which is more reliable but very difficult to read. I'll deal with it later. (Actually, I am actually using git to manage two branches: parts and reduction. The final master branch shall be my edited, final, playable version). -- Ezequiel Birman ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Use proportional spacing for a section in a score
What is the magical incantation to turn on proportional spacing in the
middle of a score, and then turn it off again?
The following is not successful in lp 2.16. Two measures are produced,
and they both use classical spacing. I would have expected the spacing
to be visibly different after setting the proportional spacing
properties.
\version "2.16.1"
music = \relative c'' { \repeat unfold 2 { c4 c16 c c c } }
\score {
\new Staff {
\music
\newSpacingSection
\set proportionalNotationDuration = #(ly:make-moment 1 16)
\override Score.SpacingSpanner #'uniform-stretching = ##t
\override Score.SpacingSpanner #'strict-note-spacing = ##t
\music
}
}
One section of my current piece features aleatoric cadenza-like
passages for two instruments, and the classical spacing does not look
good here. But classical spacing is exactly right for the rest of the
piece.
Thanks.
hjh
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Use proportional spacing for a section in a score
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 6:50 PM, James Harkins wrote: > What is the magical incantation to turn on proportional spacing in the > middle of a score, and then turn it off again? For a variation on the theme: I did manage to get proportional spacing to take effect in my test score. But, spacing is proportional throughout, including the bars at the beginning that should not be proportional. So it seems all or nothing: either the whole score is proportional, or none of it is. Really hope there's a way to do this... hjh ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: DiceWaltz-1.2
wjm writes: > Hi Martin, > You wrote:- > +++ > I have updated/re-written my Python implementation of Mozart's Musical > Dice Game > http://imslp.org/wiki/Musikalisches_W%C3%BCrfelspiel,_K.516f_%28Mozart,_Wolfgang_Amadeus%29 > +++ > I found the program DiceWaltz interesting and amusing. Many thanks! > However, when I open the generated file in Frescobaldi and run it, to > produce the pdf and midi files, Frescobaldi produces the following > error message:- > +++ > Parsing.../usr/local/lilypond/usr/share/lilypond/current/ly/articulate.ly:446:13: > In procedure map in expression (map (lambda # #)): > /usr/local/lilypond/usr/share/lilypond/current/ly/articulate.ly:446:13: > Wrong number of arguments to # > Exited with return code 1. http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3204> Will be fixed in 2.17.15. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Use proportional spacing for a section in a score
James Harkins writes:
> What is the magical incantation to turn on proportional spacing in the
> middle of a score, and then turn it off again?
>
> The following is not successful in lp 2.16. Two measures are produced,
> and they both use classical spacing. I would have expected the spacing
> to be visibly different after setting the proportional spacing
> properties.
>
> \version "2.16.1"
> music = \relative c'' { \repeat unfold 2 { c4 c16 c c c } }
>
> \score {
> \new Staff {
> \music
> \newSpacingSection
> \set proportionalNotationDuration = #(ly:make-moment 1 16)
> \override Score.SpacingSpanner #'uniform-stretching = ##t
> \override Score.SpacingSpanner #'strict-note-spacing = ##t
> \music
> }
> }
Try \set Score.proportionalNotationDuration instead.
It is conceivable that the "proper" incantation would use Timing instead
of Score everywhere, but for normal scores, both should be equivalent.
--
David Kastrup
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Use proportional spacing for a section in a score
James Harkins-2 wrote
> What is the magical incantation to turn on proportional spacing in the
> middle of a score, and then turn it off again?
>
> The following is not successful in lp 2.16. Two measures are produced,
> and they both use classical spacing. I would have expected the spacing
> to be visibly different after setting the proportional spacing
> properties.
>
> \version "2.16.1"
> music = \relative c'' { \repeat unfold 2 { c4 c16 c c c } }
>
> \score {
> \new Staff {
> \music
> \newSpacingSection
> \set proportionalNotationDuration = #(ly:make-moment 1 16)
> \override Score.SpacingSpanner #'uniform-stretching = ##t
> \override Score.SpacingSpanner #'strict-note-spacing = ##t
> \music
> }
> }
>
> One section of my current piece features aleatoric cadenza-like
> passages for two instruments, and the classical spacing does not look
> good here. But classical spacing is exactly right for the rest of the
> piece.
try
\override Score.SpacingSpanner #'shortest-duration-space = #16
instead of
\set proportionalNotationDuration =
but don't ask me why!
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Use-proportional-spacing-for-a-section-in-a-score-tp143550p143554.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Use proportional spacing for a section in a score
now, after David's reply, you may ask... Eluze -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Use-proportional-spacing-for-a-section-in-a-score-tp143550p143555.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: extending event-listener.ly
on 2013-03-27 at 14:13 Graham Percival wrote: > On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 08:21:53AM -0300, luis jure wrote: > > > BTW, i was quite curious myself about why the point-and-clik info was > > included in the first place. i thought it was only useful for pdf > > files. is this information used by your virtual violinist? > > Yes, for the interactive training, I display the pdf, and when > users click on a note it displays information about that note (and > plays it audibly). oh, i see, it makes perfect sense. BTW, is phil's patch going be merged into lilypond's event-listener? drum voices also have the right to be "listened" to... ;-) best, lj ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: extending event-listener.ly
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 2:46 PM, luis jure wrote: > BTW, is phil's patch going be merged into lilypond's event-listener? It can be. Phil, please make a git-formatted patch and send a request for merging it to bug-lilypond mailing list. If you need help with this, let us know. best, Janek ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
RE: How to run Lilypond from the Mac OS terminal
> Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 06:26:10 -0700 > From: phili...@philmassart.net > To: lilypond-user@gnu.org > Subject: Re: How to run Lilypond from the Mac OS terminal > > Hello, > > At first sight I would change one line of your .profile like this to include > the lilypond binary in your path: > > export PATH=/opt/local/bin:/opt/local/sbin:$PATH > > to > > export > PATH=/opt/local/bin:/opt/local/sbin:/Applications/LilyPond.app/Contents/Resources/bin:$PATH > Thanks, Phillip! That solved the problem Eduardo www.heartfeltsongs.com ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Help get musical scores onto Wikipedia!
Yes, while I'm not directly involved in the project, I believe Carlo is correct: for Wikipedia the primary use case is small quotations, however for the MediaWiki software support for entire scores would be wonderful. The link to the original proposal was mangled in the first email. Please note there is an exclamation mark at the end of the URL. https://wikimania2012.wikimedia.org/wiki/Submissions/We_want_scores! On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 8:17 AM, Carlo Stemberger < carlo.stember...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2013/3/23 Shane Brandes > >> Are these small quotations or entire >> scores, what is the scope. > > > I think the first one, for Wikipedia (that is an encyclopedia), but the > software (MediaWiki) might be used for many scopes. > > Carlo > > ___ > lilypond-user mailing list > lilypond-user@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user > > ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: DiceWaltz-1.2
On Thu, 28 Mar 2013, David Kastrup wrote: wjm writes: +++ I found the program DiceWaltz interesting and amusing. Many thanks! However, when I open the generated file in Frescobaldi and run it, to produce the pdf and midi files, Frescobaldi produces the following error message:- +++ Parsing.../usr/local/lilypond/usr/share/lilypond/current/ly/articulate.ly:446:13: In procedure map in expression (map (lambda # #)): /usr/local/lilypond/usr/share/lilypond/current/ly/articulate.ly:446:13: Wrong number of arguments to # Exited with return code 1. http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3204> Will be fixed in 2.17.15. I have been testing my DiceWaltz program with LilyPond 2.16.2 without seeing the error. Is this bug new in 2.17.x? Doesn't really matter if it is found and fixed, I'm just curious. -- MT ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: DiceWaltz-1.2
Martin Tarenskeen writes: > On Thu, 28 Mar 2013, David Kastrup wrote: > >> wjm writes: >>> +++ >>> I found the program DiceWaltz interesting and amusing. Many thanks! >>> However, when I open the generated file in Frescobaldi and run it, to >>> produce the pdf and midi files, Frescobaldi produces the following >>> error message:- >>> +++ >>> Parsing.../usr/local/lilypond/usr/share/lilypond/current/ly/articulate.ly:446:13: >>> In procedure map in expression (map (lambda # #)): >>> /usr/local/lilypond/usr/share/lilypond/current/ly/articulate.ly:446:13: >>> Wrong number of arguments to # >>> Exited with return code 1. >> >> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3204> >> >> Will be fixed in 2.17.15. > > I have been testing my DiceWaltz program with LilyPond 2.16.2 without > seeing the error. Is this bug new in 2.17.x? Doesn't really matter if > it is found and fixed, I'm just curious. Your curiosity might have made you to read the referenced issue report pointing out the introduction of the problem in December, corresponding to version 2.17.10. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
LilyPond featured in Demo videos.
Dear LilyPond, LilyPond features in a demo video that I have posted at https://vimeo.com/62188678 to publicise the new version 1.0.0 of Denemo, just released. It points out the quality of LilyPond's typesetting without manual tweaking. It also shows LilyPond adjusting the layout of the music after transposition without any further user intervention (though this example was not chosen to illustrate this point, and another example with dynamics, tempo changes etc would do that better). The collection of videos also illustrates the ability of LilyPond to keep up with input of notes (as in the Handel Harmonization demo https://vimeo.com/62426412) and shows how things like choosing page breaks, modifying beaming etc, can be most naturally achieved by clicking with the mouse on the LilyPond-typeset PDF display (https://vimeo.com/62490933, https://vimeo.com/62488213). With this version Denemo looks more like a conventional score editor. However, there is no reduction in the commitment to Denemo as a front end to LilyPond. There is still a LilyPond window where customized layouts for full score, parts or any other arrangement of the music can be edited as text and stored with the saved Denemo score. And further tweaks can be inserted in the music in that window too. (Sadly, it still lacks syntax coloring...). Richard Shann ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Lilypond \include statements and the GPL
Hello all, A question which has come up, and where I'm not sure what the answer or intention is. Lilypond is licensed under the GPL and reading through the license file, I didn't come across any granted exceptions (IIRC the fonts have an exception for embedding them into a document). So, how does this affect things when e.g. you \include a file in your personal Lilypond project? While I can't see it affecting distribution of a PDF or other graphical version of the score produced, the lack of an exception surely means that any .ly file distributed would be obliged to be released under the GPL or a compatible license. (For example, english.ly is explicitly licensed under GPLv3+ without any exception. Yes, I know that these days you should use \language "english", but that's beside the point.) I was sure this must have been discussed previously, but cannot find anything in past mailing list discussions. So can anyone advise on whether this was indeed discussed before -- and if so, what were the conclusions? I can't imagine it's intentional that Lilypond copyleft should extend so far as the .ly files of scores created by users, but as things stand I'm concerned that this may be the strict letter of the licensing. I'd welcome being pointed to obvious reasons why I'm wrong. Thanks & best wishes, -- Joe ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Lilypond \include statements and the GPL
Joseph Rushton Wakeling writes: > Hello all, > > A question which has come up, and where I'm not sure what the answer or > intention is. > > Lilypond is licensed under the GPL and reading through the license file, I > didn't come across any granted exceptions (IIRC the fonts have an exception > for > embedding them into a document). > > So, how does this affect things when e.g. you \include a file in your > personal Lilypond project? While I can't see it affecting > distribution of a PDF or other graphical version of the score > produced, the lack of an exception surely means that any .ly file > distributed would be obliged to be released under the GPL or a > compatible license. I don't see that. \include is an instruction, not an actual inclusion. As opposed to dynamic linking, there is no combined entity being formed for the sake of execution where one could possibly claim "contributory infringement". The inner workings of english.ly and its interoperation with LilyPond proper are not being accessed or questioned, either. > (For example, english.ly is explicitly licensed under GPLv3+ without > any exception. Yes, I know that these days you should use \language > "english", but that's beside the point.) If you convert english.ly into, say, an Elisp file parsing note names, things are different. > I can't imagine it's intentional that Lilypond copyleft should extend > so far as the .ly files of scores created by users, but as things > stand I'm concerned that this may be the strict letter of the > licensing. I don't see that, short of _actual_ inclusion of english.ly etc. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Lilypond \include statements and the GPL
On 03/28/2013 06:35 PM, David Kastrup wrote: > I don't see that. \include is an instruction, not an actual inclusion. > As opposed to dynamic linking, there is no combined entity being formed > for the sake of execution where one could possibly claim "contributory > infringement". The inner workings of english.ly and its interoperation > with LilyPond proper are not being accessed or questioned, either. I take the point about instruction vs. real inclusion, i.e. that what the \include command is saying is "read this set of instructions when processing this file through Lilypond" rather than "include this material in the final product". But I feel it's still an unnecessary ambiguity. english.ly isn't the best example of this, but suppose instead you have a .ly or .ily file that defines a new command, and you use that new command throughout your own .ly file? The point here is that there is certainly not a combined entity coming out of the running of your .ly file through the lilypond interpreter, but there _may_ be a combined entry in the form of your .ly source file containing calls to functions defined in GPL-licensed files. >> I can't imagine it's intentional that Lilypond copyleft should extend >> so far as the .ly files of scores created by users, but as things >> stand I'm concerned that this may be the strict letter of the >> licensing. > > I don't see that, short of _actual_ inclusion of english.ly etc. Personally I feel it would be nice to resolve any potential ambiguity. Obviously the best way to do this is just to show that I'm definitively wrong in my interpretation (this would be nice:-), but aside from that I think there are probably several other ways in which it could be done, including ensuring that all files intended to be \include'd are licensed under something more permissive (LGPL, BSD, Boost, Apache, ...), or adding a simple exception or clarification to Lilypond's license akin to the GPL font exception. I should add that the underlying motivation here is licensing clarity for some of Urs and Janek's work on useful toolboxes for Lilypond. It's clearly desirable that these kits be copylefted as far as any code derivative is concerned, but it's obviously not intended that the copyleft extend to users' .ly files. I was convinced that this issue must already have been systematically discussed with respect to Lilypond's own files, hence my questions ... ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: extending event-listener.ly
Le 28/03/2013 15:00, Janek Warchoł a écrit : On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 2:46 PM, luis jure wrote: BTW, is phil's patch going be merged into lilypond's event-listener? It can be. Phil, please make a git-formatted patch and send a request for merging it to bug-lilypond mailing list. If you need help with this, let us know. Hi, Yes, I need help. I don't know how to write a patch git-formatted. But before, I think you should ask Graham if my additions are well written, I want to say: are there some improvements needed? And what about the conversion of drum notes to midi pitches? I'm not able to find a way to write a specific function for that issue. Graham? Have you some time? Phil. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Lilypond \include statements and the GPL
On Mar 28, 2013, at 1:26 PM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote: > I should add that the underlying motivation here is licensing clarity for some > of Urs and Janek's work on useful toolboxes for Lilypond. It's clearly > desirable that these kits be copylefted as far as any code derivative is > concerned, but it's obviously not intended that the copyleft extend to users' > .ly files. > > I was convinced that this issue must already have been systematically > discussed > with respect to Lilypond's own files, hence my questions ... My understanding is always been that the GPL applies to the software used to produce a file, not to the file itself. Therefore, the GPL would not apply to the users' .ly files; the user has the option of specifying under what license any such files might be published. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: extending event-listener.ly
Hi Phil, On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 8:09 PM, Phil Hézaine wrote: > Le 28/03/2013 15:00, Janek Warchoł a écrit : >> Phil, please make a git-formatted patch and send a request >> for merging it to bug-lilypond mailing list. If you need help with >> this, let us know. > > Hi, > Yes, I need help. I don't know how to write a patch git-formatted. ok. A few questions: - what operating system do you use? (in particular, do you have some Linux at hand?) - do you have any experience with version control? - how comfortable are you with the command line? > But before, I think you should ask Graham if my additions are well written, > I want to say: are there some improvements needed? > And what about the conversion of drum notes to midi pitches? > I'm not able to find a way to write a specific function for that issue. We'll put your patch up for review, and then everybody will have the opportunity to comment on it. cheers, Janek ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: DiceWaltz-1.2
Dear David, Thanks for the information about the error and its coming fix. I should have checked with a web search to see if "articulate.ly:446:13:" produced anything useful... One becomes somewhat blinkered at times and it wasn't until I read your response that I had a look around the web... sure enough there were lots of discussions about it. I hope you have a good Easter. Regards Bill ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: extending event-listener.ly
on 2013-03-28 at 20:09 Phil Hézaine wrote:
> And what about the conversion of drum notes to midi pitches?
mmm... i wonder if that's strictly necessary? once you get the correct
text output, as you do now, it's trivial to convert the drum notes names to
pitches with whatever program you're using to process it.
on the other hand...
> I want to say: are there some improvements needed?
well, this is not related to your patch, but since you're at it... ;-)
i realized that the format-text function can only process simple text
scripts, but returns an error message when using a markup.
c^"accel." is OK, but:
c^\markup{ accel. } or c^\markup{ \italic { accel. }}
return errors:
Unsupported SCM value for format: (# (accel.))
Unsupported SCM value for format: (# ((# accel.)))
in both cases the .notes file has an empty text line where the markups
were used.
looking at the code i see that the format-text function is very basic, i
guess it wouldn't be trivial to adapt it to handle markups?
best,
lj
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: extending event-listener.ly
Le 28/03/2013 21:44, Janek Warchoł a écrit : Hi Phil, On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 8:09 PM, Phil Hézaine wrote: Le 28/03/2013 15:00, Janek Warchoł a écrit : Phil, please make a git-formatted patch and send a request for merging it to bug-lilypond mailing list. If you need help with this, let us know. Hi, Yes, I need help. I don't know how to write a patch git-formatted. ok. A few questions: - what operating system do you use? (in particular, do you have some Linux at hand?) Linux with Gentoo. - do you have any experience with version control? I've no idea. - how comfortable are you with the command line? I get by. But before, I think you should ask Graham if my additions are well written, I want to say: are there some improvements needed? And what about the conversion of drum notes to midi pitches? I'm not able to find a way to write a specific function for that issue. We'll put your patch up for review, and then everybody will have the opportunity to comment on it. cheers, Janek Phil. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: extending event-listener.ly
Le 28/03/2013 23:36, luis jure a écrit :
on 2013-03-28 at 20:09 Phil Hézaine wrote:
And what about the conversion of drum notes to midi pitches?
mmm... i wonder if that's strictly necessary? once you get the correct
text output, as you do now, it's trivial to convert the drum notes names to
pitches with whatever program you're using to process it.
Indeed. But Lilypond knows how to do this internally. If you look at the
sources you'll see the midiDrumPitches in drumpitch-init.ly
It will be straightforward.
on the other hand...
I want to say: are there some improvements needed?
well, this is not related to your patch, but since you're at it... ;-)
i realized that the format-text function can only process simple text
scripts, but returns an error message when using a markup.
c^"accel." is OK, but:
c^\markup{ accel. } or c^\markup{ \italic { accel. }}
return errors:
Unsupported SCM value for format: (# (accel.))
Unsupported SCM value for format: (# ((# accel.)))
in both cases the .notes file has an empty text line where the markups
were used.
looking at the code i see that the format-text function is very basic, i
guess it wouldn't be trivial to adapt it to handle markups?
Not for me!... err... to handle... :-)
best,
lj
Phil.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
