On Mar 28, 2013, at 1:26 PM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling <joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net> wrote:
> I should add that the underlying motivation here is licensing clarity for some > of Urs and Janek's work on useful toolboxes for Lilypond. It's clearly > desirable that these kits be copylefted as far as any code derivative is > concerned, but it's obviously not intended that the copyleft extend to users' > .ly files. > > I was convinced that this issue must already have been systematically > discussed > with respect to Lilypond's own files, hence my questions ... My understanding is always been that the GPL applies to the software used to produce a file, not to the file itself. Therefore, the GPL would not apply to the users' .ly files; the user has the option of specifying under what license any such files might be published. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
