Re: There is no "mfp" dynamic marking?!
seba1685 wrote:
>
> I need to write "mfp", "pf" and "ffp" in a score, but Lilypond wont allow
> it!
> here is my code:
>
> { bes'1\mfp }
>
> is there anyway I can get around this? maybe by making "custom" dynamics?
> thank you for your time,
>
yes, you can define it, see "New dynamic marks" in
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/notation/expressive-marks-attached-to-notes#new-dynamic-marks
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/notation/expressive-marks-attached-to-notes#new-dynamic-marks
!
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/There-is-no-%22mfp%22-dynamic-marking-%21-tp31326333p31330660.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: programming error: Going back in MIDI time
hello,
.
On 6 Apr 2011, at 06:56, "Keith OHara" wrote:
> Peter O'Doherty gmail.com> writes:
>
>> I know this has been asked before but I haven't been able to resolve it
>> satisfactorily. Can anyone suggest a solution to this error?
>
> Make the grace notes take less time with a *1/2 or something similar. The
> midi
> output gives grace notes 1/4 the duration of their note type (I think). So
> sometimes we have to fiddle with the duration so they all fit in the time
> after
> the preceding normal note.
>
>> a'8[ a' a' a'] \acciaccatura { c'8*1/2[ d' e' f' g'] } a'8[ a'8 a'8 a'8
>> ]
>
Is this a bug or should we putting this as an @knownissue?
James
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: programming error: Going back in MIDI time
James Lowe wrote Wednesday, April 06, 2011 8:19 AM On 6 Apr 2011, at 06:56, "Keith OHara" wrote: Make the grace notes take less time with a *1/2 or something similar. The midi output gives grace notes 1/4 the duration of their note type (I think). So sometimes we have to fiddle with the duration so they all fit in the time after the preceding normal note. Is this a bug or should we putting this as an @knownissue? It is unlikely to be fixed, so I think it should be a @knownissue, with a brief explanation and workaround. Trevor ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: programming error: Going back in MIDI time
On 04/06/2011 07:53 AM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
\acciaccatura { \scaleDurations #' (1 . 2) { c'8[ d' e' f' g'] } }
That works. Thanks a lot.
Regards,
Peter
==
www.peterodoherty.net
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Octava 8 in brackets?
Hi, how can I put the "8" of e.g the "G_8" clef in brackets? Thank you, Thomas ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Octava 8 in brackets?
Am 06.04.2011 10:04, schrieb Thomas Scharkowski:
Hi,
how can I put the "8" of e.g the "G_8" clef in brackets?
I use the following definition
parenthesizeOctavateEight = \override Staff.OctavateEight #'stencil =
#(lambda (grob)
(grob-interpret-markup grob
(markup #:concat ("(" #:general-align Y DOWN #:stencil
(ly:text-interface::print grob) ")"
and then
music = {
\parenthesizeOctavateEight
\clef "G_8"
c4 d e f
}
HTH,
Marc
Thank you,
Thomas
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
ottavation
Hi,
How can I adjust \set Staff.ottavation = #"8" to include it in the
layout section so it applies to the whole score?
\layout {
\context {
\Score
%\set Staff.ottavation = #"8"
}
}
Many thanks,
Peter
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Tuplet bracket visibility
Hi,
Lilypond seems to be selective in applying the \override command to
allow bracket visibility (which I have in the layout section as below).
Is there another way to force it to always do so?
Thanks again,
Peter
\layout {
\context {
\Score
\override TupletBracket #'bracket-visibility = ##t
\override TupletNumber #'text = #tuplet-number::calc-fraction-text
}
}
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
RE: ottavation
Hello,
)-Original Message-
)From: lilypond-user-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org
)[mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org] On
)Behalf Of Peter O'Doherty
)Sent: 06 April 2011 09:51
)To: lilypond-user
)Subject: ottavation
)
)Hi,
)
)How can I adjust \set Staff.ottavation = #"8" to include it in the layout
)section so it applies to the whole score?
Can't you just use
\clef "treble_8" in your score
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/notation/displaying-pitches#clef
Instead of using a \layout { } construct?
james
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
FW: ottavation
2011/4/6 James Lowe
>
> Hello,
>
> )-Original Message-
> )From: lilypond-user-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org
> )[mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org] On
> )Behalf Of Peter O'Doherty
> )Sent: 06 April 2011 09:51
> )To: lilypond-user
> )Subject: ottavation
> )
> )Hi,
> )
> )How can I adjust \set Staff.ottavation = #"8" to include it in the
> layout )section so it applies to the whole score?
>
> Can't you just use
>
> \clef "treble_8" in your score
>
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/notation/displaying-pitche
> s#clef
>
> Instead of using a \layout { } construct?
I advice to do this, too. \clef "treble_8" is explicit about pitches and
doesn't introduce any potential confusion.
cheers,
Janek
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: There is no "mfp" dynamic marking?!
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 2:41 AM, -Eluze wrote:
>
>
> seba1685 wrote:
> >
> > I need to write "mfp", "pf" and "ffp" in a score, but Lilypond wont allow
> > it!
> > here is my code:
> >
> > { bes'1\mfp }
> >
> > is there anyway I can get around this? maybe by making "custom" dynamics?
> > thank you for your time,
> >
>
> yes, you can define it, see "New dynamic marks" in
>
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/notation/expressive-marks-attached-to-notes#new-dynamic-marks
>
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/notation/expressive-marks-attached-to-notes#new-dynamic-marks
> !
>
Or, if you're using 2.12, try :
{ bes'1_\markup \dynamic { mfp } }
Ralp
--
Ralph Palmer
Montague City, MA
USA
palmer.r.vio...@gmail.com
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
FW: ottavation
From: Peter O'Doherty [mailto:k.p.odohe...@gmail.com]
Sent: 06 April 2011 12:21
To: James Lowe
Subject: Re: ottavation
Thanks for your reply, James. My question wasn't very clear - there are
numerous instances of ottava passages in the score, but not the whole score so
\clef "treble_8" is not suitable. It's not the ottava instruction as such I
want to use in the \layout { } but the format, i.e. just an "8" instead of
"8va".
Regards,
Peter
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 12:27 PM, James Lowe wrote:
Hello,
)-Original Message-
)From: lilypond-user-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org
)[mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org] On
)Behalf Of Peter O'Doherty
)Sent: 06 April 2011 09:51
)To: lilypond-user
)Subject: ottavation
)
)Hi,
)
)How can I adjust \set Staff.ottavation = #"8" to include it in the layout
)section so it applies to the whole score?
Can't you just use
\clef "treble_8" in your score
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/notation/displaying-pitches#clef
Instead of using a \layout { } construct?
james
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: ottavation
On Apr 6, 2011, at 7:22 AM, James Lowe wrote:
> From: Peter O'Doherty [mailto:k.p.odohe...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 06 April 2011 12:21
> To: James Lowe
> Subject: Re: ottavation
>
> Thanks for your reply, James. My question wasn't very clear - there are
> numerous instances of ottava passages in the score, but not the whole score
> so \clef "treble_8" is not suitable. It's not the ottava instruction as such
> I want to use in the \layout { } but the format, i.e. just an "8" instead of
> "8va".
> Regards,
> Peter
>
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 12:27 PM, James Lowe wrote:
> Hello,
>
> )-Original Message-
> )From: lilypond-user-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org
> )[mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org] On
> )Behalf Of Peter O'Doherty
> )Sent: 06 April 2011 09:51
> )To: lilypond-user
> )Subject: ottavation
> )
> )Hi,
> )
> )How can I adjust \set Staff.ottavation = #"8" to include it in the layout
> )section so it applies to the whole score?
> Can't you just use
>
> \clef "treble_8" in your score
>
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/notation/displaying-pitches#clef
>
> Instead of using a \layout { } construct?
>
> james
\score { \new Staff {
\relative c'' {
a b c d
}}
\layout { \context { \Score ottavation=#"8" } }}
Cheers,
MS
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Drums : align triplets to eights in other voice
Hi all,
Version : 2.12.3 on OSX via MacPorts
Given
\version "2.12.3"
swing = \drummode { cymr4 cymr8 cymr8 cymr4 cymr8 cymr8 }
down = \drummode { \times 2/3 { bd8 sn sn } \times 2/3 { << bd hhp >> sn
sn } \times 2/3 { bd sn sn } \times 2/3 { << bd hhp >> sn sn } }
\score {
\new DrumStaff {
<<
\new DrumVoice { \voiceOne << \swing \down >> }
}
}
This is an exercise for a jazz swing rhythm. I'd like the third note of
the tuplets in "down" to lign up with the second 8th notes of the
'swing'. Is this feasible? I joined the two voices, because I want the
stems to be aligned as well.
I've been perusing the archives and have not come across a previous
request like this.
Kindest regards,
Wim
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: ottavation
Thanks.
The code you sent applies \ottava #1 to the whole score, whereas I also
have instances of |8vb and 15va etc|. All I need is a way to change the
property to print only 8 or 15 without va, vb etc. to save me typing
\set Staff.ottavation = #"8" each time.
Thanks,
Peter
\score { \new Staff {
{
{
\ottava #1
%\set Staff.ottavation = #"8"
c''1
\ottava #-1
%\set Staff.ottavation = #"8"
c,1
}
}}
\layout {
\context {
% \Score ottavation=#"8" % this does not work
} }}
On 04/06/2011 01:51 PM, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
On Apr 6, 2011, at 7:22 AM, James Lowe wrote:
From: Peter O'Doherty [mailto:k.p.odohe...@gmail.com]
Sent: 06 April 2011 12:21
To: James Lowe
Subject: Re: ottavation
Thanks for your reply, James. My question wasn't very clear - there are numerous instances of ottava passages
in the score, but not the whole score so \clef "treble_8" is not suitable. It's not the ottava
instruction as such I want to use in the \layout { } but the format, i.e. just an "8" instead of
"8va".
Regards,
Peter
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 12:27 PM, James Lowe wrote:
Hello,
)-Original Message-
)From: lilypond-user-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org
)[mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org] On
)Behalf Of Peter O'Doherty
)Sent: 06 April 2011 09:51
)To: lilypond-user
)Subject: ottavation
)
)Hi,
)
)How can I adjust \set Staff.ottavation = #"8" to include it in the layout
)section so it applies to the whole score?
Can't you just use
\clef "treble_8" in your score
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/notation/displaying-pitches#clef
Instead of using a \layout { } construct?
james
\score { \new Staff {
\relative c'' {
a b c d
}}
\layout { \context { \Score ottavation=#"8" } }}
Cheers,
MS
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Drums : align triplets to eights in other voice
Hi,
2011/4/6 Wim Van Dijck :
> \version "2.12.3"
>
> swing = \drummode { cymr4 cymr8 cymr8 cymr4 cymr8 cymr8 }
> down = \drummode { \times 2/3 { bd8 sn sn } \times 2/3 { << bd hhp >> sn sn
> } \times 2/3 { bd sn sn } \times 2/3 { << bd hhp >> sn sn } }
>
> \score {
> \new DrumStaff {
> <<
> \new DrumVoice { \voiceOne << \swing \down >> }
>>>
> }
> }
>
> This is an exercise for a jazz swing rhythm. I'd like the third note of the
> tuplets in "down" to lign up with the second 8th notes of the 'swing'. Is
> this feasible? I joined the two voices, because I want the stems to be
> aligned as well.
>
> I've been perusing the archives and have not come across a previous request
> like this.
I'm not sure what do you want to achieve musically, but perhaps
scaling durations is what you need?
For example cymr8*2/3 = a note that looks like 8th, but its actual
duration is like an 8th triplet.
Try this:
swing = \drummode { cymr4 cymr8*4/3 cymr8*2/3 cymr4 cymr8*4/3 cymr8*2/3 }
down = \drummode { \times 2/3 { bd8 sn sn } \times 2/3 { << bd hhp >>
sn sn } \times 2/3 { bd sn sn } \times 2/3 { << bd hhp >> sn sn } }
\score {
\new DrumStaff {
<<
\new DrumVoice { \voiceOne << \swing \down >> }
>>
}
}
HTH,
Janek
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Arpeggio collision bug
Hello,
I'm coming to the final adjustment of my overture while a bug troubles me so
much. In the below harp excerpt, the arpeggio sign collides with the a'4
natural of the treble.
Regards
Haipeng
\version "2.13.57"
\paper {
ragged-right = ##t
}
upper = \relative c'' {
\clef treble \key ees \major \time 4/4
\showStaffSwitch
s2 4\arpeggio r |
}
lower = \relative c, {
\clef bass \key ees \major \time 4/4
\times 2/3 { fis8( e' a } \change Staff = "r" \times 2/3 { c e a) } \change Staff = "l" 4\arpeggio r |
}
dyn = { s1\mf }
\score {
\new PianoStaff <<
\set PianoStaff.connectArpeggios = ##t
\new Staff = "r" { \upper }
\new Dynamics { \dyn }
\new Staff = "l" { \lower }
>>
\layout {}
}
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: release candidate planning
Hi Graham, Nice to know! The git version has a LOT of really great new features. But with the git version I still have serious issues with vertical spacing that force me to downgrade to 2.12. Even if I try to tweak the vertical spacing I can't. Is there new ways to control this with 2.14? If I can workaround this problem I could test 2.13 more consistently. Best! Bernardo ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: release candidate planning
On 5 April 2011 22:29, Graham Percival wrote: > > Jan has just fixed the 1 reported Critical bug in release > candidate 5 (a bug wherein the midi output ignored rests). Unless > I hear otherwise, I'll go ahead with release candidate 6 in 24 > hours. > > Are there any other known Critical problems? I'd really like RC 6 > or 7 to be the last one. > > Users: this is really aimed at you. Download 2.13.57, test it out > on your scores, etc. If you're going to find a problem, it would > be really nice if you could find it in the next few days. I relayed a similar call on LilyPond French Users after the RC 3. Got few feedbacks. I just reported one bug. Waiting for some complementary informations about a possible issue between score-system-space and system-system-space (an example of code showing the issue basically). On 6 April 2011 02:51, Graham Percival wrote: > > Basically, we're not going to hold back 2.14 just because apple > broke stuff in 10.6.7, just like we didn't hold back 2.12 (or was > it 2.10?) because apple broke stuff in 10.5. Similarly, if ubuntu > 11.04 is broken when lilypond works on ubuntu 10.04, that won't > delay a stable release. Similarly, if windows 7 sp2 is broken, > that won't delay a stable release. I agree. Since this issue was first reported on the French Users mailing list, it appears that the problem comes from Apple and affects other softwares (using some kind of fonts). So this is not something LilyPond devs should fix, Apple devs should. Cheers, Xavier -- Xavier Scheuer ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: release candidate planning
What problems do you have? Could you supply tiny examples? Phil Holmes - Original Message - From: Bernardo Barros To: Graham Percival Cc: lilypond-user lilypond-user Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2011 3:20 PM Subject: Re: release candidate planning Hi Graham, Nice to know! The git version has a LOT of really great new features. But with the git version I still have serious issues with vertical spacing that force me to downgrade to 2.12. Even if I try to tweak the vertical spacing I can't. Is there new ways to control this with 2.14? If I can workaround this problem I could test 2.13 more consistently. Best! Bernardo -- ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: release candidate planning
2011/4/6 Phil Holmes
> What problems do you have? Could you supply tiny examples?
>
>
I'm copying a piece for ensemble, I would like to use some features like the
woodwind fingerings and the svg backend, but I can't the staffs fit
correctly on paper. There are too many instruments to have two systems in
the same page, and too few to fill the page. I get a ungly black space on
bottom of the page. I also like to have more extra space between staffs,
since I do more modern music, I usually need more pace for extra stuff.
With the 2.12 version I can do this:
\context { \Staff
\override VerticalAxisGroup #'minimum-Y-extent = #'(-8 . 8)
}
and I can fit the music on a a3 paper, with a good size and not with much
whitespace on the bottom. But the same code do nothing with the git version.
Maybe there is another way to configure vertical layout with the devel
version?
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: release candidate planning
2011/4/6 Phil Holmes > The spacing specification has changed completely. Please have a look at: > > Ok, I will try 2.13 again. Thanks! ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: release candidate planning
2011/4/6 Bernardo Barros :
>
> 2011/4/6 Phil Holmes
>>
>> What problems do you have? Could you supply tiny examples?
>
>
> I'm copying a piece for ensemble, I would like to use some features like the
> woodwind fingerings and the svg backend, but I can't the staffs fit
> correctly on paper. There are too many instruments to have two systems in
> the same page, and too few to fill the page. I get a ungly black space on
> bottom of the page.
What about using ragged-bottom = ##f?
> I also like to have more extra space between staffs,
> since I do more modern music, I usually need more pace for extra stuff.
> With the 2.12 version I can do this:
> \context { \Staff
> \override VerticalAxisGroup #'minimum-Y-extent = #'(-8 . 8)
> }
> and I can fit the music on a a3 paper, with a good size and not with much
> whitespace on the bottom. But the same code do nothing with the git version.
> Maybe there is another way to configure vertical layout with the devel
> version?
Have you read about new vertical spacing mechanism? The syntax has
changed substantially.
see
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/notation/flexible-vertical-spacing-within-systems
HTH,
Janek
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: release candidate planning
The spacing specification has changed completely. Please have a look at:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/notation/vertical-spacing
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: Bernardo Barros
To: Phil Holmes
Cc: Graham Percival ; lilypond-user lilypond-user
Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2011 3:51 PM
Subject: Re: release candidate planning
2011/4/6 Phil Holmes
What problems do you have? Could you supply tiny examples?
I'm copying a piece for ensemble, I would like to use some features like the
woodwind fingerings and the svg backend, but I can't the staffs fit correctly
on paper. There are too many instruments to have two systems in the same page,
and too few to fill the page. I get a ungly black space on bottom of the page.
I also like to have more extra space between staffs, since I do more modern
music, I usually need more pace for extra stuff.
With the 2.12 version I can do this:
\context { \Staff
\override VerticalAxisGroup #'minimum-Y-extent = #'(-8 . 8)
}
and I can fit the music on a a3 paper, with a good size and not with much
whitespace on the bottom. But the same code do nothing with the git version.
Maybe there is another way to configure vertical layout with the devel version?
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: release candidate planning
2011/4/6 Janek Warchoł > > Have you read about new vertical spacing mechanism? The syntax has > changed substantially. > see > http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/notation/flexible-vertical-spacing-within-systems > > Thanks, I will read this throughout :-) ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: ottavation
On Apr 6, 2011, at 9:26 AM, Peter O'Doherty wrote:
> Thanks.
> The code you sent applies \ottava #1 to the whole score, whereas I also have
> instances of 8vb and 15va etc. All I need is a way to change the property to
> print only 8 or 15 without va, vb etc. to save me typing \set
> Staff.ottavation = #"8" each time.
> Thanks,
> Peter
>
> \score { \new Staff {
> {
> {
> \ottava #1
> %\set Staff.ottavation = #"8"
> c''1
> \ottava #-1
> %\set Staff.ottavation = #"8"
> c,1
> }
>
> }}
> \layout {
> \context {
> % \Score ottavation=#"8" % this does not work
> } }}
>
>
>
>
> On 04/06/2011 01:51 PM, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
>>
>> On Apr 6, 2011, at 7:22 AM, James Lowe wrote:
>>
>>> From: Peter O'Doherty [mailto:k.p.odohe...@gmail.com]
>>> Sent: 06 April 2011 12:21
>>> To: James Lowe
>>> Subject: Re: ottavation
>>>
>>> Thanks for your reply, James. My question wasn't very clear - there are
>>> numerous instances of ottava passages in the score, but not the whole score
>>> so \clef "treble_8" is not suitable. It's not the ottava instruction as
>>> such I want to use in the \layout { } but the format, i.e. just an "8"
>>> instead of "8va".
>>> Regards,
>>> Peter
>>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 12:27 PM, James Lowe wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> )-Original Message-
>>> )From: lilypond-user-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org
>>> )[mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org] On
>>> )Behalf Of Peter O'Doherty
>>> )Sent: 06 April 2011 09:51
>>> )To: lilypond-user
>>> )Subject: ottavation
>>> )
>>> )Hi,
>>> )
>>> )How can I adjust \set Staff.ottavation = #"8" to include it in the layout
>>> )section so it applies to the whole score?
>>> Can't you just use
>>>
>>> \clef "treble_8" in your score
>>>
>>> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/notation/displaying-pitches#clef
>>>
>>> Instead of using a \layout { } construct?
>>>
>>> james
>> \score { \new Staff {
>> \relative c'' {
>> a b c d
>> }}
>> \layout { \context { \Score ottavation=#"8" } }}
>>
>> Cheers,
>> MS
>> ___
>> lilypond-user mailing list
>> lilypond-user@gnu.org
>> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>>
Kinda kludgy, but it works! Automating this type of truncating can likely
become part of LilyPond for 2.15/2.16. In the meantime, this should do the
trick.
#(define (make-ottava-set-short music)
(let ((octavation (ly:music-property music 'ottava-number)))
(list (context-spec-music
(make-apply-context
(lambda (context)
(let ((offset (* -7 octavation))
(string (assoc-get octavation '((2 . "15")
(1 . "8")
(0 . #f)
(-1 . "8")
(-2 . "15")
(set! (ly:context-property context 'middleCOffset) offset)
(set! (ly:context-property context 'ottavation) string)
(ly:set-middle-C! context
'Staff
shortOttava = #(define-music-function (parser location octave) (integer?)
(make-music 'OttavaMusic 'ottava-number octave 'elements-callback
make-ottava-set-short))
\score { \new Staff {
\relative c'' {
\shortOttava #1 a b c d \shortOttava #0 a b c d
}}}___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Drums : align triplets to eights in other voice
Interesting! Very nice thank you!
I'm trying to write down a swing (it's written as eighths, but played as
triplets without the middle third) on the ride,
while playing triplets on the bass and the snare, as an exercise.
So while playing, the last triplet of the snare should be played together with
the second eighth on the ride.
(Hope that made sense)
This will do nicely! :)
Next, I'd like to get the stem lengths to be the same, but I think I can figure
that out by myself ;)
I'm new to Lilypond, in case you hadn't noticed ;) But loving it already
Kind regards,
Wim
On 06 Apr 2011, at 15:38, Janek Warchoł wrote:
> swing = \drummode { cymr4 cymr8*4/3 cymr8*2/3 cymr4 cymr8*4/3 cymr8*2/3 }
> down = \drummode { \times 2/3 { bd8 sn sn } \times 2/3 { << bd hhp >>
> sn sn } \times 2/3 { bd sn sn } \times 2/3 { << bd hhp >> sn sn } }
>
> \score {
> \new DrumStaff {
> <<
> \new DrumVoice { \voiceOne << \swing \down >> }
>>>
> }
> }
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: ottavation
On 06/04/11 23:26, Peter O'Doherty wrote:
Thanks.
The code you sent applies \ottava #1 to the whole score, whereas I
also have instances of |8vb and 15va etc|. All I need is a way to
change the property to print only 8 or 15 without va, vb etc. to save
me typing \set Staff.ottavation = #"8" each time.
Thanks,
Peter
\score { \new Staff {
{
{
\ottava #1
%\set Staff.ottavation = #"8"
c''1
\ottava #-1
%\set Staff.ottavation = #"8"
c,1
}
}}
\layout {
\context {
% \Score ottavation=#"8" % this does not work
} }}
Why not just define something like
eightU = { \ottava #1 \set Staff.ottavation = #"8" }
eightD = { \ottava #-1 \set Staff.ottavation = #"8" }
{
\eightU
c''1
\eightD
c,1
}
Nick
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
