2011/4/6 Bernardo Barros <bernardobarr...@gmail.com>:
>
> 2011/4/6 Phil Holmes <m...@philholmes.net>
>>
>> What problems do you have? Could you supply tiny examples?
>
>
> I'm copying a piece for ensemble, I would like to use some features like the
> woodwind fingerings and the svg backend, but I can't the staffs fit
> correctly on paper. There are too many instruments to have two systems in
> the same page, and too few to fill the page. I get a ungly black space on
> bottom of the page.
What about using ragged-bottom = ##f?
> I also like to have more extra space between staffs,
> since I do more modern music, I usually need more pace for extra stuff.
> With the 2.12 version I can do this:
> \context { \Staff
> \override VerticalAxisGroup #'minimum-Y-extent = #'(-8 . 8)
> }
> and I can fit the music on a a3 paper, with a good size and not with much
> whitespace on the bottom. But the same code do nothing with the git version.
> Maybe there is another way to configure vertical layout with the devel
> version?
Have you read about new vertical spacing mechanism? The syntax has
changed substantially.
see
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/notation/flexible-vertical-spacing-within-systems
HTH,
Janek
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
