using Ramdisk
Hi I'd like to use Lilypond in an interactive music learning program where short response times are needed. I think running Lilypond on a ramdisk could help. Does anyone know how to do that? - Thomas ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Lyrics above bars
Hello, 2009/1/3 Hasi > The subject titel says it: > Can I put lyrics above the bars/notes instead of underneath? Easily. 1. Goto LilyPond documentation page - http://lilypond.org/web/documentation/; 2. Click 'Lilypond Snippet Repository (LSR)'; 3. In the search box enter 'lyrics above', click [search]; 4. Click on first snippet image and read (another approach - the second snippet). Antanas Budriūnas ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: stems up?
Ivo Bouwmans wrote Saturday, January 03, 2009 11:54 PM
(It is strange, though, that in my original version (see below) the
stemUp did not force the stem upwards.)
Not really, since the code below also has a \stemDown at
the same musical moment in the same Voice. Only one of
these can be effective. Which of them takes precedence
is not clearly defined, although usually it is the last
one encountered. Here \stemDown wins.
Introducing a second voice allows both \stemUp and \stemDown
to work separately on the notes assigned to the two
respective Voices.
=== wrong version:
{
<< { \voiceOne e''2. } { \voiceTwo a'2~a'8[ b'] } >>
<< { \stemUp e''2.\fermata } { \stemDown b'2.\fermata } >>
}
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: First Frog Task
Hi Carl, Le vendredi 02 janvier 2009 à 20:16 -0700, Carl D. Sorensen a écrit : > I've attached a file README-contrib.txt, which is an attempt at what one of > you described as "Frogging for Dummies". It gives at least a brief > introduction to the key issues that I remember as obstacles when I got > started with LilyPond development. This is an excellent introduction! I only have one remark: the sentence "There is no one-page listing of the entire file tree, and there's no table of contents or index for the location of the various files." is misleading IMO: there are about 3000 source files, so any one-page listing of the entire file tree would not be very usable, and ROADMAP lists what you should expect to find in each directory. I suggest you replace the sentence above with something like "Any one-page listing of the entire file tree would not be very usable, as the tree contains about 3000 source files; however, " You could argue that most entries in ROADMAD could be elaborated with more explanations. > When you're done with this task, each function for which you are responsible > should have an internationalizable docstring. By internationalizable, I > mean that it will look like (_i "This is the docstring."), rather than "This > is the docstring." Because we are adding internationalizable docstrings, > you'll need to check even the functions that have docstrings. We'll probably have to replace _i with something like _doc to make sure the strings go to lilypond-doc gettext domain and not lilypond, but this can wait until the Frogs have completed documentation of all functions. Cheers, John ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: First Frog Task
Le 4 janv. 09 à 15:15, John Mandereau a écrit : When you're done with this task, each function for which you are responsible should have an internationalizable docstring. By internationalizable, I mean that it will look like (_i "This is the docstring."), rather than "This is the docstring." Because we are adding internationalizable docstrings, you'll need to check even the functions that have docstrings. We'll probably have to replace _i with something like _doc to make sure the strings go to lilypond-doc gettext domain and not lilypond, but this can wait until the Frogs have completed documentation of all functions. Remember to update the definition of the define-music-function macro (in scm/music-functions.scm) when you change _i with _doc. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Key signature change with naturals before bar line.
This question concerns changing the key signature e.g. from a major to a flat major. Lilypond standard behavior seems to be printing the natural signs and the flat signs both after the bar line, but I have also come across the natural signss being noted _before_ the bar line, and the new key signature applied _after_ the bar line, see the attached image. (Whether this is sensible is another question.) How would I obtain this behavior in Lilypond? I apologize if this is already documented somewhere; a quick search did not seem to reveal a solution. Many thanks, Lasse <>___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
[no subject]
How to make an easy installation on vista ? I have very little it background. Best regards Edmond.___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Fragment with broken/torn/shredded staff lines
Arne Peters wrote: > > > > Why not take the .ps-file generated by Lilypond, and use Ghostview to > convert it to an imagefile. This then can be further manipulated with > GIMP/Photoshop etc before importing in the textfile. > This may not be the most elegant way to do it but should work. > > No, I'm looking for something directly in the Lilypond code: too many excerpts to do it manually!!! - Piero Faustini, PhD student Dipartimento di Scienze Storiche Sezione musicologia Università di Ferrara Software used: - LyX 1.6.1 on WinXP; EndNote & JabRef - MikTex - LaTeX class: Koma book - Lilypond and MusixTeX for example excerpts - BibLaTeX for bibliographies -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Fragment-with-broken-torn-shredded-staff-lines-tp21220482p21275945.html Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Multi-stave TextSpanner line
Hi Nick, 2009/1/4 Nick Payne : > I have a TextSpanner where I draw a small vertical line at the end of the > TextSpanner line. Where the line continues for more than one stave, The > small vertical line is being drawn at the end of each stave. I'd prefer that > it only get drawn where the spanner line actually ends. Can this be done? I > haven't found the command to achieve it. This is the music function as I > have it at the moment. I have a very similar function for showing barres > (only difference being that the line is solid), and I have the same problem > there. Have a look at this post: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2008-09/msg00635.html Regards, Neil ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: a "floating" markup with many \score blocks in it
Am 04.01.2009 um 15:43 schrieb Francois Planiol:
Hello!
I need for a kind of Summary of "Different way to harmonize a
melodie" a
command of markup, I suppose. If it does exist, i dont find it or
how and be
very pleased for having help
My idea would be something like
\markup \floating { % to wrap the scores ...
\score { ... } % T-S-D
\score { ... } % Cantional
\score { ... } % With secondary dominant
\score { ... } % 5-Voices
\score { ... } % melody in bass
\score { ... } % melody in alt with figured descant
\score { ... } % chromatic bass
\score { ... } % mixture-sounds
\score { ... } % Messiaen-mode-2
\score { ... } % polytonal
}
... which would fill (f.e.) a page (or more or less, and of course on
different pages if required) with the snippets, beginning up left
on the
page, going forward line by line to right down for the last
fragment. And of
course with the layout according to the length of the fragment. (some
examples may be 4-5 measures length, other 3-4 notes)
I suppose the decision of ragged-last-bottom to be defined in the
paper-block.
So the result layout f.e.
T-S-D - Cantional - With secondary dominant
5-Voices - - - - - - - - - melody in bass - - - - - - -
melody in alt - - - - - with figured descant - - -
chromatic bass - - - - - - mixture-sounds - - - - -
Messiaen-mode-2 - - - polytonal - - - - - - - - - - -
Thanks in advance from
I don't know if I completely understand what you want, but maybe
\markuplines, or more specifically \wordwrap-lines will do what
you're looking for?
version "2.11.65"
music = \relative c' { c d e f }
\markuplines \wordwrap-lines {
\score { \music \layout {} }
\score { \music \layout {} }
\score { \music \layout {} }
\score { \music \layout {} }
\score { \music \layout {} }
\score { \music \layout {} }
\score { \music \layout {} }
\score { \music \layout {} }
\score { \music \layout {} }
\score { \music \layout {} }
\score { \music \layout {} }
\score { \music \layout {} }
\score { \music \layout {} }
\score { \music \layout {} }
\score { \music \layout {} }
\score { \music \layout {} }
\score { \music \layout {} }
\score { \music \layout {} }
\score { \music \layout {} }
\score { \music \layout {} }
\score { \music \layout {} }
\score { \music \layout {} }
\score { \music \layout {} }
\score { \music \layout {} }
}
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re:
Am 04.01.2009 um 11:11 schrieb fa070232: How to make an easy installation on vista ? I have very little it background. Best regards Edmond. I don't have any experience with windows vista, but the lilypond wiki may help http://lilypondwiki.tuxfamily.org/index.php?title=Where_is_the_app%3F___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Harmonic question
Le dimanche 04 janvier 2009 à 14:50 +, Trevor Daniels a écrit : > I've now added a ref to Harmonics in References for for fretted strings in > NR 2.4.1. I guess you mean 328df0d0d386fb553062680fd3c5be6d47548218 "Docs: NR 2.4 Fretted: Add ref to Harmonics" (tagged as 2.12.1-1)? > Do you think this is adequate? It certainly is, but I'm not sure people who read "Default tablatures" node will have the idea to find this link there. I was rather thinking of a link directly in running text and "See also". Cheers, John ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re:
James E. Bailey wrote: Am 04.01.2009 um 11:11 schrieb fa070232: How to make an easy installation on vista ? I have very little it background. Best regards Edmond. I don't have any experience with windows vista, but the lilypond wiki may help http://lilypondwiki.tuxfamily.org/index.php?title=Where_is_the_app%3F The Windows .exe file available at the Lilypond website works perfectly with Vista: http://lilypond.org/web/install/ Jon -- Jonathan Kulp http://www.jonathankulp.com ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Fragment with broken/torn/shredded staff lines
Mark Polesky wrote: > > I've cooked up a way of "tearing" the right side of > the staff, which you can take a look at. > ... > Otherwise, is this about what you're looking for? > > Thanks Mark, good job but I was looking for something different: I don't want to "draw" anything, just have my staff end without a vertical line (this is already achieved if I don't end the measure) but also without a vertical end. e.g. (I'm drawing the far right end of the staff with the "_" character): Not like this (vertical, the default given staff end): __ __ __ __ __ But like THIS (irregular): __ ___ ___ _ (even better if with random lengths for using in multiple staves systems) or, if too difficoult, like this (diagonal): ___ __ _ Anyway, your example didn't work nice for me, I had to adjust properties like this,: rightTearWidth = #-1 rightTearHeight = #4 rightTearLineWidth = #0.1 rightTearSerrations = #4 rightTearPadding = #-1 (I think it was what you tried to achieve in your example) Thanks again Mark, I'll use your tip, but still hoping to find out my way! Piero - Piero Faustini, PhD student Dipartimento di Scienze Storiche Sezione musicologia Università di Ferrara Software used: - LyX 1.6.1 on WinXP; EndNote & JabRef - MikTex - LaTeX class: Koma book - Lilypond and MusixTeX for example excerpts - BibLaTeX for bibliographies -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Fragment-with-broken-torn-shredded-staff-lines-tp21220482p21275863.html Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Fragment with broken/torn/shredded staff lines
Piero,
This should be closer to what you want, but I need to emphasize that
it's not finished yet. It *is* possible to randomize the staff-line
tear-lengths; hopefully I'll have time to work on that a little
later. But I figured I'd send off what I have so far. For now, only
the top 2 variables are modifiable:
rightTearWidth = #2
rightTearList = #'(1 3 2 2 0)
Hope this helps!
- Mark
_
\version "2.12.0"
rightTearWidth = #2
rightTearList = #'(1 3 2 2 0) % (any 5 numbers from 0-4)
rTW = #rightTearWidth
qRTW = #(/ rTW 4)
rTL = #rightTearList
rTyE = #'(1.5 . 2.5)
rightTear = {
\once \override Staff.BarLine #'stencil = #ly:text-interface::print
\once \override Staff.BarLine #'text = \markup
\override #'(baseline-skip . 0) \with-color #white
\column {
\filled-box #`(,(* (list-ref rTL 0) qRTW) . ,rTW) \rTyE #0
\filled-box #`(,(* (list-ref rTL 1) qRTW) . ,rTW) \rTyE #0
\filled-box #`(,(* (list-ref rTL 2) qRTW) . ,rTW) \rTyE #0
\filled-box #`(,(* (list-ref rTL 3) qRTW) . ,rTW) \rTyE #0
\filled-box #`(,(* (list-ref rTL 4) qRTW) . ,rTW) \rTyE #0
}
\once \override Staff.BarLine #'X-extent = #`(0 . ,(- rTW 0.1))
\break
}
\score {
\relative {
\repeat unfold 4 { g'4 d' b d } \break \rightTear
\repeat unfold 4 { g,4 d' b d } \break \rightTear
}
\layout {
ragged-right = ##t
}
}
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Missing petrucci-f clef (and other missing clefs)
Hi Stefan, 2009/1/3 Stefan Waler : > Hi, > > lilypond provides one petrucci style f clef (called "petrucci-f"). It's not documented yet, but petrucci-f3 is also available. You can also use petrucci-f4, but that's identical to petrucci-f. It would be straightforward to add any other variants, assuming there's no need for changes to the glyph. Regards, Neil ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Staccato in brackets
I need to make staccato signs in brackets. Does anyone know how? ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: using Ramdisk
In message <4960746d.2040...@floetenbau.ch>, Thomas Fehr writes Hi I'd like to use Lilypond in an interactive music learning program where short response times are needed. I think running Lilypond on a ramdisk could help. Does anyone know how to do that? Which OS. If you're running linux, read up on tmpfs (and/or unionfs). Basically, you'll need to set all your lilypond stuff up in one directory. Then (if you're using tmpfs) copy that stuff into your tmpfs mount and run it from there. If you use unionfs (which I don't actually know anything about) you may be able to declare that as ram and just mount it over your lily directory. The difference between the two is that tmpfs simply creates a file-system in ram (masking the directory it's mounted over, hence you having to copy the lily stuff into that directory), while unionfs will create a "see through" filesystem over the mountpoint - any writes will go to the unionfs, while any reads, if they can't be found in the unionfs will look in the directory under the mount. So if you can mount the unionfs in ram, that's probably your best bet. Cheers, Wol -- Anthony W. Youngman - anth...@thewolery.demon.co.uk ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
frescobaldi automatic indentation
Hi, I have frescobaldi now running nicely on my Fedora 10 desktop. I think frescobaldi is brilliant! Just what I was looking for. I have two questions left: Should indentation work automatically? On my system it doesn't. When I go to the tools->indentation->lilypond menu, I see it is grayed out. Something missing on my system ? My second question is a feature request. (Or maybe it is a feature I haven't found yet ?) : It would be nice to have midi-playback intergrated in Frescobaldi for test-hearing. Or an easy way to call a softsynth-midi-player like for example fluidsynth or timidity. Frescobaldi is close to perfect, thank you ! -- Martin Tarenskeen ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Harmonic question
John I've now added a ref to Harmonics in References for for fretted strings in NR 2.4.1. Do you think this is adequate? Trevor - Original Message - From: "Trevor Daniels" To: "John Mandereau" Cc: Sent: Monday, December 29, 2008 11:23 PM Subject: Re: Harmonic question John Mandereau wrote Monday, December 29, 2008 11:01 PM Le lundi 29 décembre 2008 à 22:53 +, Trevor Daniels a écrit : Yes. The warning under Harmonics in 2.3.1 in the Notation Reference says: "Note: Harmonics must be defined inside a chord construct even if there is only a single note." Should we add copy this warning into "Common notation for fretted strings" or add there a "See also" reference to 2.3.1? Good point. I'll add a pointer for harmonics to the "References for fretted strings section I know about the "no duplicate information" rule but I feel like a "See also" might not be enough. I think a clear annotated reference for harmonics will be adequate. John Trevor ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Adding lyrics to a "piano" score.
Hello.
I have a Piano score (three voices) organized in the following way:
upperA = { ... melody ... }
upperB = { ... melody ... }
upper = { ... << \upperA \\ \upperB >> }
lower = { ... melody ... }
and
\score {
<<
\new PianoStaff <<
\new Staff = "upper" \upper
\new Staff = "lower" \lower
>>
>>
...
}
Now, I added a variable named "song":
song = \lyricmode { Song to be re- ad. }
But I can't find a suitable way to associate this lyrics to the upperA
melody (and if possible above the staff).
Can anybody give me a hint?
TIA,
Alberto
--
Alberto Simões - Departamento de Informática - Universidade do Minho
Campus de Gualtar - 4710-057 Braga - Portugal
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Staccato in brackets
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am Sonntag, 4. Januar 2009 18:56:46 schrieb Hasi: > I need to make staccato signs in brackets. Does anyone know how? Yes, the documentation knows a lot ;-) It even has this very example with parenthesized staccato-dots: http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond/Documentation/user/lilypond/Inside-the-staff.html#Parentheses Cheers, Reinhold - -- - -- Reinhold Kainhofer, reinh...@kainhofer.com, http://reinhold.kainhofer.com/ * Financial & Actuarial Math., Vienna Univ. of Technology, Austria * http://www.fam.tuwien.ac.at/, DVR: 0005886 * LilyPond, Music typesetting, http://www.lilypond.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFJYPzGTqjEwhXvPN0RAn62AKDGDq9Le9xk0LF1cxqfU6Ar8kNjdwCfUvnQ /44OIfdFGbI/g8xNtx4YJoM= =8u45 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
a "floating" markup with many \score blocks in it
Hello!
I need for a kind of Summary of "Different way to harmonize a melodie" a
command of markup, I suppose. If it does exist, i dont find it or how and be
very pleased for having help
My idea would be something like
\markup \floating { % to wrap the scores ...
\score { ... } % T-S-D
\score { ... } % Cantional
\score { ... } % With secondary dominant
\score { ... } % 5-Voices
\score { ... } % melody in bass
\score { ... } % melody in alt with figured descant
\score { ... } % chromatic bass
\score { ... } % mixture-sounds
\score { ... } % Messiaen-mode-2
\score { ... } % polytonal
}
... which would fill (f.e.) a page (or more or less, and of course on
different pages if required) with the snippets, beginning up left on the
page, going forward line by line to right down for the last fragment. And of
course with the layout according to the length of the fragment. (some
examples may be 4-5 measures length, other 3-4 notes)
I suppose the decision of ragged-last-bottom to be defined in the paper-block.
So the result layout f.e.
T-S-D - Cantional - With secondary dominant
5-Voices - - - - - - - - - melody in bass - - - - - - -
melody in alt - - - - - with figured descant - - -
chromatic bass - - - - - - mixture-sounds - - - - -
Messiaen-mode-2 - - - polytonal - - - - - - - - - - -
Thanks in advance from
Francois Planiol
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: using Ramdisk
On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 10:58:13AM +, Anthony W. Youngman wrote: > In message <4960746d.2040...@floetenbau.ch>, Thomas Fehr > writes >> Hi >> >> I'd like to use Lilypond in an interactive music learning program where >> short response times are needed. I think running Lilypond on a ramdisk >> could help. Does anyone know how to do that? >> I don't know if you need all the power Lilypond offers for your program. If not, you might want to give abcm2ps ( http://moinejf.free.fr ) a try. It is not as powerful as lilypond, but much faster. It might even be fast enough for your purpose without needing to set up a ramdisk. But if you really want to use a ramdisk: abcm2ps is much easier to install - it is just one simple binary that you can copy to your ramdisk and it will be ready to use. It does not have the complex modular design that makes Lilypond more difficult to install by hand. Martin Tarenskeen ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Key signature change with naturals before bar line.
2009/1/4 Lasse Rempe > > This question concerns changing the key signature e.g. from a major to a flat > major. Lilypond standard behavior seems to be printing the natural signs and > the flat signs both after the bar line, but I have also come across the > natural signss being noted _before_ the bar line, and the new key signature > applied _after_ the bar line, see the attached image. (Whether this is > sensible is another question.) How would I obtain this behavior in Lilypond? > > I apologize if this is already documented somewhere; a quick search did not > seem to reveal a solution. > Search list archive for - Naturals' position when key changes - about 10 days ago. Antanas Budriūnas ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Umlaute
Do any of you know how I can use Umlaute?
I'd like to do the following:
_\markup { \italic hartnäckig }
it just comes out as "hartnckig"
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Missing petrucci-f clef (and other missing clefs)
Neil Puttock wrote: It's not documented yet, but petrucci-f3 is also available. I should have tried :-) It would be straightforward to add any other variants, assuming there's no need for changes to the glyph. Great! Could you add petrucci-f5 at the next opportunity? Thanks, Stefan ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: KDE and platforms
Op zaterdag 3 januari 2009, schreef 胡海鹏 Hu Haipeng: > I'm about to download Frescobaldi, but I don't know whether Kde is for > all platforms or Linux only. I want to speed up my structure construction > (to say, a large orchestral score's stave structure--Orchestrallily has > many limitations), but LilyPondTool uses Java, which can't be accessed by > my screen reader and braille display. Could someone tell me? KDE4 should be (or is already) available for Windows, but I have only tested Frescobaldi on Linux. Frescobaldi is written in Python and heavily uses much KDE functionality (including the text editor and PDF viewer component). When KDE4 becomes easily available on Windows, it should not be difficult to get Frescobaldi up and running in Windows. best regards, Wilbert Berendsen -- Frescobaldi, LilyPond editor for KDE: http://www.frescobaldi.org/ ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Frescobaldi on Fedora
Op zaterdag 3 januari 2009, schreef Martin Tarenskeen: > Building and installing went OK. I can see the Frescobaldi message > windows and edit a lilypond file. But PDF preview fails: "Could not load > okularpart". What is "okularpart" ? It seems that I don't have it ? What > am I missing ? Thats the PDF viewer of KDE. Install Okular and it should work. best regards, Wilbert Berendsen -- Frescobaldi, LilyPond editor for KDE: http://www.frescobaldi.org/ ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: frescobaldi automatic indentation
Op zondag 4 januari 2009, schreef Martin Tarenskeen: > I have two questions left: Should indentation work automatically? > On my system it doesn't. When I go to the tools->indentation->lilypond > menu, I see it is grayed out. Something missing on my system ? Yes: I'm sorry I didn't notice earlier: You should update the syntax highlighting of LilyPond. Go inside Frescobaldi (or KWrite or Kate) to Settings/Editor/Save and Load/File types/ and click Download Highlighting definitions. Update the LilyPond syntaxis highlighting to 3.01. Then the LilyPond indenter should not be grayed out anymore. If you always want the LilyPond indenter, select in the same settings dialog the filetype: Other/LilyPond and place the exact following text in the text entry "Variables:" : kate: indent-mode lilypond; You can also place a comment line like: % kate: indent-mode lilypond; in the lilypond file. best regards, Wilbert Berendsen -- Frescobaldi, LilyPond editor for KDE: http://www.frescobaldi.org/ ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Umlaute
2009/1/4 Hasi :
> Do any of you know how I can use Umlaute?
> I'd like to do the following:
>
> _\markup { \italic hartnäckig }
>
> it just comes out as "hartnckig"
On Linux with java version "1.6.0_07", jEdit, LilyPond 2.12.1 and
LilypondTool 2.11-r1 there is no problem – Umlaut in place.
It depends on the system software, the editor, the font in use,
Lilypond version etc.
Next time please add information about your OS, editor, Lilypond
version. It could help to track a problem.
General advice: get latest version of all software.
Antanas Budriūnas
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Harmonic question
On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 04:43:55PM +0100, John Mandereau wrote: > Le dimanche 04 janvier 2009 à 14:50 +, Trevor Daniels a écrit : > > I've now added a ref to Harmonics in References for for fretted strings in > > NR 2.4.1. > > > > Do you think this is adequate? > > It certainly is, but I'm not sure people who read "Default tablatures" > node will have the idea to find this link there. I was rather thinking > of a link directly in running text and "See also". No; references is the correct place. If people skip over the references to previous docs, then it's their own fault. We simply /cannot/ add links to everything in all places in the docs; the best we can do is have a consistent format/policy and stick to it. Even if the policy doesn't make sense to everybody at first, if it's used consistently they'll get accustomed to it. Cheers, - Graham ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Umlaute
On 4 jan 2009, at 19:31, Hasi wrote:
Do any of you know how I can use Umlaute?
I'd like to do the following:
_\markup { \italic hartnäckig }
it just comes out as "hartnckig"
Hasi,
Please save the file with UTF-8 encoding. Most editors offer this
option on the save (as) menu.
If you need more help, please inform us of your OS, editor and
lilypond version.
HTH,
Arjan
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Umlaute
doesn't it have to do with the encoding which should be UTF-8 ?
ole
Am 04.01.2009 um 20:15 schrieb Antanas Budriūnas:
2009/1/4 Hasi :
Do any of you know how I can use Umlaute?
I'd like to do the following:
_\markup { \italic hartnäckig }
it just comes out as "hartnckig"
On Linux with java version "1.6.0_07", jEdit, LilyPond 2.12.1 and
LilypondTool 2.11-r1 there is no problem – Umlaut in place.
It depends on the system software, the editor, the font in use,
Lilypond version etc.
Next time please add information about your OS, editor, Lilypond
version. It could help to track a problem.
General advice: get latest version of all software.
Antanas Budriūnas
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: [ANN] Frescobaldi 0.7 released, a new LilyPond music editor
Op donderdag 1 januari 2009, schreef Wilbert Berendsen:
> Op woensdag 31 december 2008, schreef Grammostola Rosea:
> > Is there also a possibility to play midi in a quick way? Like it was
> > possible in lilykde in the log?
> Will be added Very Soon Now (TM).
It is added now in SVN. Install Subversion if not already there and:
svn co http://lilykde.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/frescobaldi
cd frescobaldi
mkdir build
cd build
cmake .. -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=$(kde4-config --exec-prefix)
make
sudo make install # or: su -c "make install"
please try: open in Frescobaldi a file with a \midi {} line inside \score { }
block, click the Run LilyPond button and watch the log. There is also a menu
entry LilyPond->Generated Files that has useful actions on the updated files
(PDF, MIDI).
best regards,
Wilbert Berendsen
--
Frescobaldi, LilyPond editor for KDE: http://www.frescobaldi.org/
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Adding lyrics to a "piano" score.
Hi,
you can define a named voice context here:
upper = { << \new Voice = "melody" \upperA \\ \upper B >> }
for whatever reason the \voiceOne property gets lost though, so you have to
assign it explicitly to upperA like this:
upperA = { \voiceOne ..music.. }
to place the lyrics above the staff you have to define the lyrics in score
block after the PianoStaff like this:
\new Lyrics \with { alignAboveContext = "upper" }
{
\lyricsto "melody"
\song
}
the alignAboveContext hast to be a named Staff in this case because lyrics are
attached to a Staff.
I hope it's clear.
Regards,
Tao
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Sun, 04 Jan 2009 18:08:47 +
> Von: "Alberto Simões"
> An: lilypond
> Betreff: Adding lyrics to a "piano" score.
> Hello.
>
> I have a Piano score (three voices) organized in the following way:
>
> upperA = { ... melody ... }
> upperB = { ... melody ... }
> upper = { ... << \upperA \\ \upperB >> }
> lower = { ... melody ... }
>
> and
>
> \score {
> <<
> \new PianoStaff <<
> \new Staff = "upper" \upper
> \new Staff = "lower" \lower
> >>
> >>
> ...
> }
>
> Now, I added a variable named "song":
>
> song = \lyricmode { Song to be re- ad. }
>
> But I can't find a suitable way to associate this lyrics to the upperA
> melody (and if possible above the staff).
>
> Can anybody give me a hint?
>
> TIA,
> Alberto
>
> --
> Alberto Simões - Departamento de Informática - Universidade do Minho
> Campus de Gualtar - 4710-057 Braga - Portugal
>
>
> ___
> lilypond-user mailing list
> lilypond-user@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
--
Sensationsangebot verlängert: GMX FreeDSL - Telefonanschluss + DSL
für nur 16,37 Euro/mtl.!* http://dsl.gmx.de/?ac=OM.AD.PD003K1308T4569a
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Adding lyrics to a "piano" score.
Hello, Tao
Tao Cumplido wrote:
> you can define a named voice context here:
> upper = { << \new Voice = "melody" \upperA \\ \upper B >> }
>
> for whatever reason the \voiceOne property gets lost though, so you have to
> assign it explicitly to upperA like this:
> upperA = { \voiceOne ..music.. }
>
> to place the lyrics above the staff you have to define the lyrics in score
> block after the PianoStaff like this:
>
> \new Lyrics \with { alignAboveContext = "upper" }
> {
>\lyricsto "melody"
>\song
> }
>
> the alignAboveContext hast to be a named Staff in this case because lyrics
> are attached to a Staff.
>
> I hope it's clear.
Well, I am not yet sure how it works, but it works!!
Thank you :)
My best regards,
Alberto
>
> Regards,
>
> Tao
>
> Original-Nachricht
>> Datum: Sun, 04 Jan 2009 18:08:47 +
>> Von: "Alberto Simões"
>> An: lilypond
>> Betreff: Adding lyrics to a "piano" score.
>
>> Hello.
>>
>> I have a Piano score (three voices) organized in the following way:
>>
>> upperA = { ... melody ... }
>> upperB = { ... melody ... }
>> upper = { ... << \upperA \\ \upperB >> }
>> lower = { ... melody ... }
>>
>> and
>>
>> \score {
>> <<
>> \new PianoStaff <<
>> \new Staff = "upper" \upper
>> \new Staff = "lower" \lower
>> >>
>> >>
>> ...
>> }
>>
>> Now, I added a variable named "song":
>>
>> song = \lyricmode { Song to be re- ad. }
>>
>> But I can't find a suitable way to associate this lyrics to the upperA
>> melody (and if possible above the staff).
>>
>> Can anybody give me a hint?
>>
>> TIA,
>> Alberto
>>
>> --
>> Alberto Simões - Departamento de Informática - Universidade do Minho
>> Campus de Gualtar - 4710-057 Braga - Portugal
>>
>>
>> ___
>> lilypond-user mailing list
>> lilypond-user@gnu.org
>> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>
--
Alberto Simões - Departamento de Informática - Universidade do Minho
Campus de Gualtar - 4710-057 Braga - Portugal
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Fragment with broken/torn/shredded staff lines
Mark Polesky wrote:
>
> This should be closer to what you want, but I need to emphasize that
> it's not finished yet. It *is* possible to randomize the staff-line
> tear-lengths;
>
Mark,
That's GREAT!!! Exactly what I need!!!
The randomization is not important, it's just that when we have many staves
with the exact same "broken" end, it's not so elegant, but I repeat it: this
is a small detail.
Nicer would be to obtain the same thing in the left side, but this, as you
can imagine, is not as simple to use in a "nice" way: you can't (of course)
let a clef (or metro mark) stay just at the beginning of a "broken" staff,
but you can't just get rid of it! At least you have to put a clef in
"parenthesis" or in a previous separate broken fragment, as produced with
your code with this:
\score {
\relative {
s1 \rightTear
}
BUT - as it is, it's very good.
Thanks a lot
Piero
-
Piero Faustini, PhD student
Dipartimento di Scienze Storiche
Sezione musicologia
Università di Ferrara
Software used:
- LyX 1.6.1 on WinXP; EndNote & JabRef
- MikTex
- LaTeX class: Koma book
- Lilypond and MusixTeX for example excerpts
- BibLaTeX for bibliographies
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Fragment-with-broken-torn-shredded-staff-lines-tp21220482p21280494.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
How to not display string numbers in chords
Hello again!
I'm once again posting with a newbie question.
I'm trying to make a score with both music and tab staffs, as well as chord
names a fret diagrams. But NOT string numbers in circles.
Can anyone suggest the proper thing to set? Is it an override?
My Score section looks like this:
\score {
<<
\new ChordNames {
\mychords
}
\new FretBoards {
\mychords
}
\new Staff {
\myTempo
\myKey
\override Staff.TimeSignature #'style = #'()
\myTime
\mynotes
}
\new TabStaff {
\override Staff.TimeSignature #'style = #'()
\myTime
\stemDown
\override Beam #'damping = #+inf.0
\mytabs
}
>>
Thanks for any help!
Cheers,
GF
--
50°48'39.85"N 4°25'20.29"E
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Harmonic question
Le dimanche 04 janvier 2009 à 11:19 -0800, Graham Percival a écrit : > No; references is the correct place. If people skip over the > references to previous docs, then it's their own fault. We simply > /cannot/ add links to everything in all places in the docs; the > best we can do is have a consistent format/policy and stick to it. > Even if the policy doesn't make sense to everybody at first, if > it's used consistently they'll get accustomed to it. Thanks, my memory wasn't up to date with the policies, I'll reread them. Best, John ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Missing petrucci-f clef (and other missing clefs)
Stefan Waler waler.at> writes:
>
> Great! Could you add petrucci-f5 at the next opportunity?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Stefan
>
You can do it yourself, by putting this line in your .ly file:
#(append! supported-clefs '(("petrucci-f5" . ("clefs.petrucci.f" 4 0
I don't think the glyph is really quite right, though; it looks
balanced for f-4. But I don't know what Petrucci actually used.
Michael
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Fragment with broken/torn/shredded staff lines
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am Sonntag, 4. Januar 2009 18:13:04 schrieb Mark Polesky: > This should be closer to what you want, but I need to emphasize that > it's not finished yet. It *is* possible to randomize the staff-line > tear-lengths; hopefully I'll have time to work on that a little > later. Cool, both your versions (those with the zig-zag line and this one) look absolutely fantastic! Can you plase add both of them to the LSR so they will be preserved for future users, too? Cheers, Reinhold - -- - -- Reinhold Kainhofer, reinh...@kainhofer.com, http://reinhold.kainhofer.com/ * Financial & Actuarial Math., Vienna Univ. of Technology, Austria * http://www.fam.tuwien.ac.at/, DVR: 0005886 * LilyPond, Music typesetting, http://www.lilypond.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFJYRoNTqjEwhXvPN0RAuYbAKDeOTIV3FXWuQx8D709WhAsqz78tQCfX2AR JkSSwaz8QfXO87PL9ZPKlTE= =HtbS -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: rearrange music flow
2009/1/3 Carl D. Sorensen :
> Antanas,
>
>
> On 1/3/09 9:21 AM, "Antanas Budri?nas" wrote:
>
>>
>>> parallelStaffs = #(define-music-function (parser location firstStaff
>>> firstLyrics
>>> secondStaff secondLyrics)
>>> (ly:music? ly:xxx? ly:music? ly:xxx?)
>>> #{ <<
>>> \context Staff = "StaffOne" {
>>>\context Voice = "VoiceOne" {
>>> $firstStaff
>>>}
>> \context Lyrics = "LyricsOne" \lyricmode {
>> \set associatedVoice = #"VoiceOne"
>> $firstLyrics
>> }
>>> }
>>> \context Staff = "StaffTwo" {
>>>\context Voice = "VoiceTwo" {
>>> $secondStaff
>>>}
>> \context Lyrics = "LyricsTwo" \lyricmode {
>> \set associatedVoice = #"VoiceTwo"
>> $secondLyrics
>> }
>>> }
>>>
>>> #})
>>>
>>> intro = \parallelStaffs
>>> {c''4 c''}
>> { ala ala }
>
> You need to put \lyricsmode { ala ala }, because the content is lyrics,
> not notes.
>
>>>
>>> {c'4 c'}
>> { alb alb }
>>>
>>>
>>> verse = \parallelStaffs
>>> {d''4 d''}
>> { bla bla }
>>>
>>> {d'4 d'}
>> { blb blb }
>>>
>>>
>>> \score {
>>> {
>>> \intro
>>> \verse
>>> }
>>> }
This idea (lyrics in parallelStaffs) seems not easy to implement and
it would be rarely handy. For example: by rests in particural voice I
can avoid "sylable has no note attached" error only using \skip
function.
I decided not to fead lyrics to parallelStaffs function, but
anotherway (in \score) lyrics goes above or below Grandstaff only. I
can't imagine how to place lyrics directly by staff they belongs, when
in Lily code the lyrics are not in direct sequence to this staff or
voice.
Any hints?
Antanas Budriūnas
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Umlaute
Am 04.01.2009 um 20:22 schrieb Arjan Bos:
On 4 jan 2009, at 19:31, Hasi wrote:
Do any of you know how I can use Umlaute?
I'd like to do the following:
_\markup { \italic hartnäckig }
it just comes out as "hartnckig"
Hasi,
Please save the file with UTF-8 encoding. Most editors offer this
option on the save (as) menu.
If you need more help, please inform us of your OS, editor and
lilypond version.
HTH,
Or if you absolutely cannot use utf-8 file encoding, you can directly
insert the unicode. See LM 3.3.3 Text Encoding.
\version "2.11.65"
\markup \concat {hartkn \char ##x00E4 ckig }
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: How to not display string numbers in chords
Grateful Frog wrote:
Hello again!
I'm once again posting with a newbie question.
I'm trying to make a score with both music and tab staffs, as well as chord
names a fret diagrams. But NOT string numbers in circles.
Can anyone suggest the proper thing to set? Is it an override?
My Score section looks like this:
\score {
<<
\new ChordNames {
\mychords
}
\new FretBoards {
\mychords
}
\new Staff {
\myTempo
\myKey
\override Staff.TimeSignature #'style = #'()
\myTime
\mynotes
}
\new TabStaff {
\override Staff.TimeSignature #'style = #'()
\myTime
\stemDown
\override Beam #'damping = #+inf.0
\mytabs
}
>>
You can make them transparent by doing an override in the regular staff:
\override Voice.StringNumber #'transparent = ##t
HTH,
Jon
--
Jonathan Kulp
http://www.jonathankulp.com
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: How to not display string numbers in chords
Thanks! That did it perfectly! GF On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 10:05 PM, Jonathan Kulp wrote: > Grateful Frog wrote: > >> Hello again! >> I'm trying to make a score with both music and tab staffs, as well as >> chord >> names a fret diagrams. But NOT string numbers in circles. >> > > You can make them transparent by doing an override in the regular staff: > > \override Voice.StringNumber #'transparent = ##t > > HTH, > > Jon > > ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: How to not display string numbers in chords
Grateful Frog wrote: Thanks! That did it perfectly! GF Glad to help, but beware that transparent objects still take up space so if later you have layout problems with respect to fingerings and other things, it could have to do with the transparent string numbers. Best, Jon -- Jonathan Kulp http://www.jonathankulp.com ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: How to not display string numbers in chords
Jonathan Kulp gmail.com> writes: > > Grateful Frog wrote: > > Thanks! That did it perfectly! > > GF > > > > Glad to help, but beware that transparent objects still take up space so > if later you have layout problems with respect to fingerings and other > things, it could have to do with the transparent string numbers. Best, > > Jon > A better override would be to \override StringNumber #'stencil = ##f which eliminates the printing of StringNumbers in the music staff. Carl ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: a "floating" markup with many \score blocks in it
Hello Mr Bailey and thanks.
By me, the result is: see the first 1/2-page of file.
I need to have: see the 2nd 1/2-page (done with oodraw, not with lilypond of
course)
Thanks again, in advance
Francois
Am Sonntag, 4. Januar 2009 16:39 schrieben Sie:
> music = \relative c' { c d e f }
> \markuplines \wordwrap-lines {
> \score { \music \layout {} }
> \score { \music \layout {} }
> \score { \music \layout {} }
> \score { \music \layout {} }
> \score { \music \layout {} }
> \score { \music \layout {} }
> \score { \music \layout {} }
> \score { \music \layout {} }
> \score { \music \layout {} }
> \score { \music \layout {} }
> \score { \music \layout {} }
> \score { \music \layout {} }
> \score { \music \layout {} }
> \score { \music \layout {} }
> \score { \music \layout {} }
> \score { \music \layout {} }
> \score { \music \layout {} }
> \score { \music \layout {} }
> \score { \music \layout {} }
> \score { \music \layout {} }
> \score { \music \layout {} }
> \score { \music \layout {} }
> \score { \music \layout {} }
> \score { \music \layout {} }
> }
---
scoreBlocksInOneLine.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: using Ramdisk
Thomas Fehr wrote: Hi I'd like to use Lilypond in an interactive music learning program where short response times are needed. I think running Lilypond on a ramdisk could help. Does anyone know how to do that? - Thomas Working on Lilypond files in a ramdisk (which is not exactly what you asked for) sure saves a lot of disk thrashing -- helpful when you make a lot of mistakes, and have to run and rerun and rerun Lilypond on the same file, like me. Assuming you run Linux, you already have around 16 ramdisks, though they're not activated by default. See them with: ls -lh /dev/ram* Create a 16 MB ramdisk with mkfs -t ext3 -q /dev/ram1 16384 Mount it with mkdir -p /home/user/desktop/ramdisk mount /dev/ram1 /home/user/desktop/ramdisk -o defaults,rw modifying "/home/user/desktop" to suit your system/preferences. To do this automatically when you power up your machine, add these lines to /etc/rc.local: /sbin/mkfs mkfs -t ext3 -q /dev/ram1 16384 /bin/mount mount /dev/ram1 /home/user/desktop/ramdisk -o defaults,rw /bin/chown user:root /home/user/desktop/ramdisk /bin/chmod 0750 /home/user/desktop/ramdisk Whether you use ramdisks or not, you can increase harddisk performance by enabling the 'noatime' option in /etc/fstab. Whenever you read a file, you system also performs a writing operation, to store the time of last access. Disable this by opening /etc/fstab, look for you root filesystem, and change where it says 'defaults' to 'defaults,noatime', then reboot and enjoy faster computing. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: a "floating" markup with many \score blocks in it
Francois
The suggestion works as you want it in 2.12.1. What version are you using?
You may need to set ragged-right = ##t in 2.10 or early versions of 2.11:
\layout {
ragged-right = ##t
}
in every \score block.
Trevor
- Original Message -
From: "Francois Planiol"
To:
Sent: Sunday, January 04, 2009 9:31 PM
Subject: Re: a "floating" markup with many \score blocks in it
Hello Mr Bailey and thanks.
By me, the result is: see the first 1/2-page of file.
I need to have: see the 2nd 1/2-page (done with oodraw, not with lilypond of
course)
Thanks again, in advance
Francois
Am Sonntag, 4. Januar 2009 16:39 schrieben Sie:
music = \relative c' { c d e f }
\markuplines \wordwrap-lines {
\score { \music \layout {} }
\score { \music \layout {} }
\score { \music \layout {} }
\score { \music \layout {} }
\score { \music \layout {} }
\score { \music \layout {} }
\score { \music \layout {} }
\score { \music \layout {} }
\score { \music \layout {} }
\score { \music \layout {} }
\score { \music \layout {} }
\score { \music \layout {} }
\score { \music \layout {} }
\score { \music \layout {} }
\score { \music \layout {} }
\score { \music \layout {} }
\score { \music \layout {} }
\score { \music \layout {} }
\score { \music \layout {} }
\score { \music \layout {} }
\score { \music \layout {} }
\score { \music \layout {} }
\score { \music \layout {} }
\score { \music \layout {} }
}
---
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Frescobaldi on Fedora
On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 07:35:20PM +0100, Wilbert Berendsen wrote: > Op zaterdag 3 januari 2009, schreef Martin Tarenskeen: > > Building and installing went OK. I can see the Frescobaldi message > > windows and edit a lilypond file. But PDF preview fails: "Could not load > > okularpart". What is "okularpart" ? It seems that I don't have it ? What > > am I missing ? > > Thats the PDF viewer of KDE. Install Okular and it should work. On Fedora okular is part of the kdegraphics rpm package. Yum install kedgraphics did the trick. -- Martin Tarenskeen ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Missing petrucci-f clef (and other missing clefs)
Michael Lauer wrote: I don't know what Petrucci actually used. Obviously, he used the latest stable release of Lilypond...;) ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: rearrange music flow
On 1/4/09 1:27 PM, "Antanas Budri?nas" wrote:
> 2009/1/3 Carl D. Sorensen :
>> Antanas,
>>
>>
>> On 1/3/09 9:21 AM, "Antanas Budri?nas" wrote:
>>
>>>
parallelStaffs = #(define-music-function (parser location firstStaff
>>
>> You need to put \lyricsmode { ala ala }, because the content is lyrics,
>> not notes.
>>
{c'4 c'}
>>> { alb alb }
verse = \parallelStaffs
{d''4 d''}
>>> { bla bla }
{d'4 d'}
>>> { blb blb }
\score {
{
\intro
\verse
}
}
>
> This idea (lyrics in parallelStaffs) seems not easy to implement and
> it would be rarely handy. For example: by rests in particural voice I
> can avoid "sylable has no note attached" error only using \skip
> function.
Putting lyrics in a score is easy, as long as you don't want to generate a
bunch of segments with lyrics to put together.
AssociatedVoice works best (maybe only) with lyrics that have durations
added.
There needs to be some development work to really make this idea work
properly. It's on my todo list, but will be a while before I get to it.
> I decided not to fead lyrics to parallelStaffs function, but
> anotherway (in \score) lyrics goes above or below Grandstaff only. I
> can't imagine how to place lyrics directly by staff they belongs, when
> in Lily code the lyrics are not in direct sequence to this staff or
> voice.
>
> Any hints?
See http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.lilypond.general/37493
for a template that shows how to place lyrics in a lead sheet,
and see the templates section of the Learning Manual for several examples of
mixing lyrics and staffs.
HTH,
Carl
>
> Antanas Budri?nas
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: using Ramdisk
Thomas Fehr wrote: Hi I'd like to use Lilypond in an interactive music learning program where short response times are needed. I think running Lilypond on a ramdisk could help. Does anyone know how to do that? - Thomas I mucked up part of my previous mail -- it should read: To do this automatically when you power up your machine, add these lines to /etc/rc.local: /sbin/mkfs -t ext3 -q /dev/ram1 16384 /bin/mount /dev/ram1 /home/user/desktop/ramdisk -o defaults,rw /bin/chown user:root /home/user/desktop/ramdisk /bin/chmod 0750 /home/user/desktop/ramdisk Oops. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: a "floating" markup with many \score blocks in it
Hi Francois, By me, the result is: see the first 1/2-page of file. I need to have: see the 2nd 1/2-page (done with oodraw, not with lilypond of course) Look for \startStaff and \stopStaff in the documentation and list archive. HTH! Kieren. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
collision between glissando and sharp
In the following code sample how would I prevent the glissando and sharp
sign collision?
--
Thanks,
Chip
\version "2.12.1"
\header {}
staffNotes = \new Staff {
\time 4/4
\key c \major
\clef treble
\relative c'' {
\override Glissando #'thickness = #3
\override Glissando #'style = #'zigzag
\override Glissando #'minimum-length = #6
\override Glissando #'springs-and-rods = #ly:spanner::set-spacing-rods
c2 a\glissando cis d }}
\score { << \staffNotes >>
\midi {}
\layout {}}
\paper {}
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: using Ramdisk
In message <49613875.9020...@gmail.com>, M Watts writes Whether you use ramdisks or not, you can increase harddisk performance by enabling the 'noatime' option in /etc/fstab. Whenever you read a file, you system also performs a writing operation, to store the time of last access. Disable this by opening /etc/fstab, look for you root filesystem, and change where it says 'defaults' to 'defaults,noatime', then reboot and enjoy faster computing. WARNING! I think some things (notably source control) depend on atime so be careful. Cheers, Wol -- Anthony W. Youngman - anth...@thewolery.demon.co.uk ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: using Ramdisk
Le dimanche 04 janvier 2009 à 23:23 +, Anthony W. Youngman a écrit : > WARNING! > > I think some things (notably source control) depend on atime so be > careful. I have used noatime for years without noticeable inconsistency with Git and CVS. Cheers, John ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: using Ramdisk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am Montag, 5. Januar 2009 00:23:06 schrieb Anthony W. Youngman: > In message <49613875.9020...@gmail.com>, M Watts > writes > > >Whether you use ramdisks or not, you can increase harddisk performance > >by enabling the 'noatime' option in /etc/fstab. Whenever you read a > >file, you system also performs a writing operation, to store the time > >of last access. Disable this by opening /etc/fstab, look for you root > >filesystem, and change where it says 'defaults' to 'defaults,noatime', > >then reboot and enjoy faster computing. > > WARNING! > > I think some things (notably source control) depend on atime so be > careful. No, atime is the time the file was las **accessed**. I don' t know anything that depends on this. Source code control depends heavily on the time a file was last modified, which will of course still work. Cheers, Reinhold - -- - -- Reinhold Kainhofer, reinh...@kainhofer.com, http://reinhold.kainhofer.com/ * Financial & Actuarial Math., Vienna Univ. of Technology, Austria * http://www.fam.tuwien.ac.at/, DVR: 0005886 * LilyPond, Music typesetting, http://www.lilypond.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFJYUylTqjEwhXvPN0RAouXAJ4t286hCzYa6Ls21TsgEmPLuSjyngCfbs5W Ha/IeZPeTTfvbfXHlRZ4nFI= =2OuP -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: First Frog Task
On 1/4/09 7:24 AM, "Nicolas Sceaux" wrote: > Le 4 janv. 09 à 15:15, John Mandereau a écrit : > >>> When you're done with this task, each function for which you are >>> responsible >>> should have an internationalizable docstring. By >>> internationalizable, I >>> mean that it will look like (_i "This is the docstring."), rather >>> than "This >>> is the docstring." Because we are adding internationalizable >>> docstrings, >>> you'll need to check even the functions that have docstrings. >> >> We'll probably have to replace _i with something like _doc to make >> sure >> the strings go to lilypond-doc gettext domain and not lilypond, but >> this >> can wait until the Frogs have completed documentation of all >> functions. > > Remember to update the definition of the define-music-function macro (in > scm/music-functions.scm) when you change _i with _doc. I don't understand the significance of the change from _i to _idoc (which I would recommend instead of _doc). What is the difference between the "lilypond gettext domain" and the "lilypond-doc gettext domain". How would I know that things are working properly after I changed all the docstrings and the define-music-function macro? Thanks, Carl ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: using Ramdisk
Le dimanche 04 janvier 2009 à 09:33 +0100, Thomas Fehr a écrit : > I'd like to use Lilypond in an interactive music learning program where > short response times are needed. I think running Lilypond on a ramdisk > could help. Does anyone know how to do that? I'm not sure a ramdisk will increase performance much, but it is surely much work. If you want short response times, use a machine with enough RAM, so that even if first invocation is a bit slow, further invocations will use disk cache in RAM. 512 MB of RAM is the bare minimum on a modern GNU/Linux with a fat desktop like Gnome or KDE, but several gigabytes are not too much if you run big or many ly files, or if you use a lot of programs simulatneously. HTH, John ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: First Frog Task
Le dimanche 04 janvier 2009 à 17:02 -0700, Carl D. Sorensen a écrit :
> I don't understand the significance of the change from _i to _idoc (which I
> would recommend instead of _doc). What is the difference between the
> "lilypond gettext domain" and the "lilypond-doc gettext domain".
The difference is about which domain each string is translated in:
po/{lilypond.pot,*.po} for domain lilypond, and
Documentation/{lilypond-doc.po,*.po} for domain. PO files are loaded,
installed and managed in radically different ways depending on the
domain: lilypond domain is to be installed and is loaded at each
lilypond execution, and it is managed by translation, whereas
lilypond-doc is not installed (it might be in the future), not loaded by
lilypond binary and managed directly on Git by translators and
maintainers.
> How would
> I know that things are working properly after I changed all the docstrings
> and the define-music-function macro?
Just compile the docs and check that music functions docstrings still
appear in the docs.
Cheers,
John
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: First Frog Task
On 1/4/09 5:33 PM, "John Mandereau" wrote:
> Le dimanche 04 janvier 2009 à 17:02 -0700, Carl D. Sorensen a écrit :
>> I don't understand the significance of the change from _i to _idoc (which I
>> would recommend instead of _doc). What is the difference between the
>> "lilypond gettext domain" and the "lilypond-doc gettext domain".
>
Anybody have complaints about using "_idoc"?
> The difference is about which domain each string is translated in:
> po/{lilypond.pot,*.po} for domain lilypond, and
> Documentation/{lilypond-doc.po,*.po} for domain. PO files are loaded,
> installed and managed in radically different ways depending on the
> domain: lilypond domain is to be installed and is loaded at each
> lilypond execution, and it is managed by translation, whereas
> lilypond-doc is not installed (it might be in the future), not loaded by
> lilypond binary and managed directly on Git by translators and
> maintainers.
Thanks for the explanation. This makes lots of sense.
>
>
>> How would
>> I know that things are working properly after I changed all the docstrings
>> and the define-music-function macro?
>
> Just compile the docs and check that music functions docstrings still
> appear in the docs.
>
I don't need to check the translations, right? As long as the english
docstrings appear we're good, right?
Carl
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: First Frog Task
On 1/4/09 7:15 AM, "John Mandereau" wrote: > Hi Carl, > Le vendredi 02 janvier 2009 à 20:16 -0700, Carl D. Sorensen a écrit : >> I've attached a file README-contrib.txt, which is an attempt at what one of >> you described as "Frogging for Dummies". It gives at least a brief >> introduction to the key issues that I remember as obstacles when I got >> started with LilyPond development. > > This is an excellent introduction! I only have one remark: the sentence > > "There is no one-page listing of the entire file tree, and > there's no table of contents or index for the location of the various > files." > > is misleading IMO: there are about 3000 source files, so any one-page > listing of the entire file tree would not be very usable, and ROADMAP > lists what you should expect to find in each directory. I suggest you > replace the sentence above with something like > > "Any one-page listing of the entire file tree would not be very usable, > as the tree contains about 3000 source files; however, " > > You could argue that most entries in ROADMAD could be elaborated with > more explanations. Thanks for the feedback. I've changed it and attached an updated copy of the file. The relevant paragraph has become: One of the real challenges when getting started on extending or patching LilyPond is trying to find where the relevant program lines are found. With nearly 3000 files in the source distribution, a listing of the entire file tree would take more than 50 pages. There is a file ROADMAP that lists the directory structure and the kind of files that are in each folder. However, it's difficult to know exactly where the program lines you want are. I hope this is better. Thanks, Carl README-contrib.txt Description: README-contrib.txt ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
