[no subject]
สวัสดีครับ ขออนุญาตแนะนำ ✔️ทุนหมุนเวียนระยะสั้น ดอกเบี้้ยถูก ✔️อนุมัติสูงสุด 5,000,000 บาท ✔️ไม่เช็คเครดิต บูโร ไม่ต้องมีบุคคลค้ำประกัน ✔️อัตราดอกเบี้ยต่ำ ลดต้น ลดดอกเบี้ย ✔️ถ้าท่านสนใจบริการของเรา โทรด่วนหาเรา ☎️ 082-5928519 คุณเอก Line ID : esc.credit (ให้เราเป็นส่วนหนึ่งในครอบครับท่านนะครับ)
Re: Simple GCC projects page
On Tue, 20 Mar 2018, Christopher Higgs via gcc wrote: > If this belongs in a different mailbox, please let me know where it > should be sent. This was the right address, though sadly it somehow fell through the cracks originally. > I would like to start contributing to GCC. In viewing the relevant pages > it became clear that they have not been updated for some time, which > makes starting to contribute a bit more challenging. > > To name a few on the Simple GCC projects page:1. A few references are > made to the java front-end. Indeed, and this is something we (specifically Eric) addressed, together with various other issues on this page. > Under code cleanliness, the bullet for enormous files lists files in the > 150-500K sizes. These sizes are not current and there are at least a > couple of files in the MB range (the C++ parser.c file for example). Eric updated these as well, alas some have further grown; I'll see to do a new tally and update that. > Simplifying parser action code. GCC seems to have migrated away from > parser generators in favor of ad hoc approaches. Does this project still > apply? I don't think so, and will push a patch to remove this and associated items in a minute. A belated thank you for your feedback; I'll be looking for further issue and will happily look into anything else you may find. Gerald
Re: smtgcc translation validation
On Sat, 30 Sep 2023, Krister Walfridsson via Gcc wrote: > I have now released the new implementation for translation validation I talked > about at the GNU Tools Cauldron last week: > https://github.com/kristerw/smtgcc Wouldn't it be appropriate/nice to promote this a bit more strongly from gcc.gnu.org? One example I can think of is https://gcc.gnu.org/extensions.html . Another might be https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/ to help understand whether something is a user bug or GCC bug? Happy to accept patches, or if you want to suggest some text massage that into HTML and add it. Gerald
gcc-15-20240818 is now available
Snapshot gcc-15-20240818 is now available on https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/15-20240818/ and on various mirrors, see https://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 15 git branch with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch master revision fc41263061808a8539ba7ee1f607920a54e7b265 You'll find: gcc-15-20240818.tar.xz Complete GCC SHA256=02a7a8de5d83079d1fe11c75a5d03e01f32a937917e1c15aa95f94cb54573aae SHA1=9d11c00b34e868e2e42bdd5a8a6dc5c09377dfc4 Diffs from 15-20240811 are available in the diffs/ subdirectory. When a particular snapshot is ready for public consumption the LATEST-15 link is updated and a message is sent to the gcc list. Please do not use a snapshot before it has been announced that way.
Re: Simple GCC projects page
On Sun, Aug 18, 2024 at 8:21 AM Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > > On Tue, 20 Mar 2018, Christopher Higgs via gcc wrote: > > If this belongs in a different mailbox, please let me know where it > > should be sent. > > This was the right address, though sadly it somehow fell through the > cracks originally. > > > I would like to start contributing to GCC. In viewing the relevant pages > > it became clear that they have not been updated for some time, which > > makes starting to contribute a bit more challenging. > > > > To name a few on the Simple GCC projects page:1. A few references are > > made to the java front-end. > > Indeed, and this is something we (specifically Eric) addressed, together > with various other issues on this page. > > > Under code cleanliness, the bullet for enormous files lists files in the > > 150-500K sizes. These sizes are not current and there are at least a > > couple of files in the MB range (the C++ parser.c file for example). > > Eric updated these as well, alas some have further grown; I'll see to do a > new tally and update that. > > > Simplifying parser action code. GCC seems to have migrated away from > > parser generators in favor of ad hoc approaches. Does this project still > > apply? > > I don't think so, and will push a patch to remove this and associated > items in a minute. > > A belated thank you for your feedback; I'll be looking for further issue > and will happily look into anything else you may find. > Oh yeah, I remember there being a few other projects on there that I also remember feeling unsure about how relevant they still were; definitely let us know if you find anything else that seems outdated... > Gerald
