Adding a nice kde port "Kwlan"
Hello Guys, Could someone please make a port for Kwlan which is a great app and nice addition for FreeBSD? It make FreeBSD more friendly for desktop/laptop users :) http://www.kde-apps.org/content/show.php?content=37041 Description: Network manager for kde. Allows you to configure different network profiles using all encryptions wpa_supplicant provides (wep, wpa, wpa2 etc) for wireless networks. Since version 0.4.5 kwlan can connect to unencrypted networks if wpa_supplicant is not available. Kwlan can also store profiles for wired networks. Dialup networks can be edited and connected to as well. Systray icons show connection statistics per interface (can be disabled). Changelog: Version 0.5.8 - - Added broadcom and bsd drivers to wpa_supplicant - Added options to configure phase1 and phase2 options - Added option to prevent interfaces from being configured by Kwlan - Added option to use custom wpa_supplicant config file -- Regards, -Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri Arab Portal http://www.WeArab.Net/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: [kde-freebsd] Adding a nice kde port "Kwlan"
On Sun, 7 Jan 2007 11:26:43 +0300 "Abdullah Al-Marrie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello Guys, > > Could someone please make a port for Kwlan which is a great app and > nice addition for FreeBSD? > > It make FreeBSD more friendly for desktop/laptop users :) > > http://www.kde-apps.org/content/show.php?content=37041 Either I'm missing something very obvious or the tarball misses files: In file included from main.cpp:3: kwlanmainwin.h:11:19: kwlan.h: No such file or directory Also from what he author writes, at least on Suse, it won't build with automake-1.9, only 1.7 -- IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" "Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect" BOFH excuse #205: Quantum dynamics are affecting the transistors signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Unfetchable distfiles reminder
Dear porters, This is just a reminder to please periodically check the list of unfetchable distfiles at http://people.freebsd.org/~fenner/portsurvey/ . In particular, the list of ports with no MAINTAINER with distfile problems, which currently has 245 bad ports, is http://people.freebsd.org/~fenner/portsurvey/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Since no one is responsible for these ports, the problem won't get fixed unless someone on this list takes the initiative. In addition, the list of all ports with any unfetchable distfile is http://people.freebsd.org/~fenner/portsurvey/bad.html if you don't mind coordinating your fixes with the port MAINTAINER. Thanks for your help! Bill "distfiles" Fenner ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Out of Office
Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren, ich bin bis inkl. 7. Januar 2007 im Urlaub. In dringenden Fällen können Sie sich für technische Anfragen und Probleme an meinen Kollegen Herrn Deeken ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wenden. Für alle anderen Anfragen steht Ihnen Herr Hochrein ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) zur Verfügung. Mit freundlichen Grüßen Jan-Peter Koopmann I am on vacation until January 7th. In urgent technical matters please do not hesitate to contact my colleague Mr. Deeken ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). For other inquiries please contact Mr. Hochrein ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). Kind regards Jan-Peter Koopmann -- This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. Received: from mx2.freebsd.org ([69.147.83.53]) by mail.seceidos.de with esmtp (Exim 4.62) id 1H3Upr-000LWb-TF (envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 07 Jan 2007 11:01:04 +0100 Received: from hub.freebsd.org (hub.freebsd.org [69.147.83.54]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0A0F62D83 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 10:01:03 + (GMT) (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE00816A40F for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 10:01:03 + (UTC) (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [69.147.83.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B45F13C457 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 10:01:01 + (UTC) (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l07A10vp052853 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 10:01:00 GMT (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id l07A10ms052848; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 10:01:00 GMT (envelope-from fenner+portsurvey) Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 10:01:00 GMT Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bill "distfiles" Fenner) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FreeBSD ports: 1 unfetchable distfile: mail/mailscanner-devel Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received-SPF: pass (proxy.intern.seceidos.de: domain of FreeBSD.org designates 69.147.83.53 as permitted sender) client-ip=69.147.83.53; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; helo=mx2.freebsd.org; X-Exim-Seceidos-QueueID: 1H3Upr-000LWb-TF X-MsgInfo-Seceidos: This message was scanned for viruses. If you have any questions please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-MailScanner-Seceidos: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-Seceidos-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-4.665, required 6, BAYES_00 -5.00, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY 0.33, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY 0.00) X-MailScanner-Seceidos-EnvelopeFrom: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dear [EMAIL PROTECTED], You are listed as the FreeBSD port maintainer for 1 port whose distfiles are not fetchable from their MASTER_SITES. Could you please visit http://people.freebsd.org/~fenner/portsurvey/[EMAIL PROTECTED] and correct the problems listed there? The individual port with a problem is mail/mailscanner-devel. If you have already corrected the problems and submitted a PR, please accept my thanks and apologies for the delay in getting the fixes into the tree. This reminder is created automatically and does not (yet) have a way to know if a PR fixing the problem has been submitted. Please do *NOT* send your response to me directly; I do not necessarily have time to commit your fix; please instead submit a PR via 'send-pr' so it doesn't get lost. Problems are usually of two types: 1. The software package has been upgraded and the version in the port has been removed. The best solution to this problem is to upgrade the port to the most current version of the software package. If you are a FreeBSD committer, then you can just upgrade the port directly. If not, you should create the updated port on your own machine, test it (and maybe even run "portlint" on it), and then use "send-pr" to submit a "diff -uNr old-port updated-port". If you added or deleted any files, please make an explicit note of it. 2. The mirror site being used no longer contains the software package in question, or no longer exists. Solutions include: a) If there are other mirror sites, just remove the bad site from the list. (Make sure that what appears to be a bad site isn't actually a problem of type 1, upgrade) b) If the README or other support files in the software documentation mention where to get the software package, use one of those sites. c) Use a search engine to find another place to get the original DISTFILES. Make sure that you don't pick a FreeBSD distfiles mirror -- if you can't find any other places where the file exists, it can be
Please confirm (conf#201ab215b2d995ca1cde406a4496467f)
<< IMPORTANT INFORMATION! >> This is an automated message. The message you sent (attached below) requires confirmation before it can be delivered. To confirm that you sent the message below, just hit the "R"eply button and send this message back (you don't need to edit anything). Once this is done, no more confirmations will be necessary. << WICHTIGE INFORMATION >> Dies ist eine automatisch generierte Antwort. Ihre Mail (unten angehaengt) muss vor der Zustellung an mich explizit bestaetigt werden. Um dies zu tun, beantworten Sie einfach diese Mail mit der "Antworten" oder "Reply"-Funktion Ihres Mailprogramms. Es sind keine Aenderungen am Text noetig. Dies ist die einzige Bestaetigung die Sie je an mich senden muessen; Ihre weiteren Nachrichten werden automatisch akzeptiert. Diese Massnahme dient der Bekaempfung von Spam. This email account is protected by: Active Spam Killer (ASK) V2.4.1 - (C) 2001-2002 by Marco Paganini For more information visit http://www.paganini.net/ask --- Original Message Follows --- Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 10:03:48 GMT From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bill "distfiles" Fenner) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FreeBSD ports: 1 unfetchable distfile: devel/avr-gdb Dear [EMAIL PROTECTED], You are listed as the FreeBSD port maintainer for 1 port whose distfiles are not fetchable from their MASTER_SITES. Could you please visit http://people.freebsd.org/~fenner/portsurvey/[EMAIL PROTECTED] and correct the problems listed there? The individual port with a problem is devel/avr-gdb. If you have already corrected the problems and submitted a PR, please accept my thanks and apologies for the delay in getting the fixes into the tree. This reminder is created automatically and does not (yet) have a way to know if a PR fixing the problem has been submitted. Please do *NOT* send your response to me directly; I do not necessarily have time to commit your fix; please instead submit a PR via 'send-pr' so it doesn't get lost. Problems are usually of two types: 1. The software package has been upgraded and the version in the port has been removed. The best solution to this problem is to upgrade the port to the most current version of the software package. If you are a FreeBSD committer, then you can just upgrade the port directly. If not, you should create the updated port on your own machine, test it (and maybe even run "portlint" on it), and then use "send-pr" to submit a "diff -uNr old-port updated-port". If you added or deleted any files, please make an explicit note of it. 2. The mirror site being used no longer contains the software package in question, or no longer exists. Solutions include: a) If there are other mirror sites, just remove the bad site from the list. (Make sure that what appears to be a bad site isn't actually a problem of type 1, upgrade) b) If the README or other support files in the software documentation mention where to get the software package, use one of those sites. c) Use a search engine to find another place to get the original DISTFILES. Make sure that you don't pick a FreeBSD distfiles mirror -- if you can't find any other places where the file exists, it can be a LOCAL_PORT or you can simply comment out the MASTER_SITES= line, with a comment explaining why. Once you have a solution, use "send-pr" to submit a "diff -u" of the Makefile. Note that this isn't an urgent issue, as people who try to build the port now will just fall back to the FreeBSD distfiles mirror. Please just put it on your list to do and get to it when you have time. These messages will continue to arrive twice a month until the fix is committed, as a reminder. (Original message truncated) ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: pgdesigner for freebsd?
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write: >Hello, > >I see that pgdesigner is NOT available in the ports... It requires >gambas that is available so I guess there would not mean a lot of work >to have a FBSD fix/patch. > >Any plans to offer the community this software? >Best regards, > >http://sourceforge.net/projects/pgdesigner Ok I briefly looked at this, but the file GAMBAS.VERSION in it says 1.9.43 (which is a development version), while 1.0.17_2 is in ports. And I'm not in the mood to make a gambas-devel port, given that my last experience with basic was many more than 10 years ago... :) (maintainer Cc'd.) Juergen ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
gnutls (and all that kde stuff...) and 4.x's old gcc
(Not sure it still really matters given 4's eol date, but...) Yesterday evening I tinderboxed lang/gambas for 4.11 (thinking that it was a compiler :) and it failed with C++ compiler errors in libgnutlsxx in security/gnutls. I looked around in /usr/local/bin and /usr/X11R6/bin and it seemed nothing was using it, so I put USE_GCC=3.4 in the port's Makefile, which made it build. Soo, should libgnutlsxx just be removed from the build on 4, or should gnutls and everything that depends on it (which seems to be all that kde stuff at least) be given USE_GCC for 4? Or should gnutls simply be IGNOREd on 4 since probably noone that still uses that wants to run kde anyway... Juergen ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: pgdesigner for freebsd?
Le Dim 7 jan 07 à 15:23:10 +0100, Juergen Lock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> écrivait : > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write: > >Hello, Hello, > >I see that pgdesigner is NOT available in the ports... It requires > >gambas that is available so I guess there would not mean a lot of work > >to have a FBSD fix/patch. > > > >Any plans to offer the community this software? > >Best regards, > > > >http://sourceforge.net/projects/pgdesigner > > Ok I briefly looked at this, but the file GAMBAS.VERSION in it > says 1.9.43 (which is a development version), while 1.0.17_2 is in > ports. And I'm not in the mood to make a gambas-devel port, given > that my last experience with basic was many more than 10 years ago... :) > (maintainer Cc'd.) I have a port of gambas-devel v. 1.9.46a which is ready (i.e. buildable and installable), but it does not run perfectly. I have been working with the author, and we already fixed some issues, but it's not yet fully usable. I have never tried pgdesigner, but the runtime part seems OK with the included examples: if you want to try it, I can send you the port "as is". Regards, -- Th. Thomas. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
update to opentaxsolver 4.01 (for 2006)
>Submitter-Id: current-users
>Originator:John E. Hein
>Organization:
>Confidential: no
>Synopsis: update to opentaxsolver 4.01 (for 2006)
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: low
>Category: ports
>Class: maintainer-update
>Release: FreeBSD 4.x+
>Environment: FreeBSD 4.x+
>Description:
opentaxsolver 4.01 was recently released (US tax forms only
at the moment; state forms coming "soon").
This is the first update for tax year 2006. As such, this
conflicts with the last version for 2005 (3.08).
Perhaps there should be a different version of the port for each
tax year (at least for a few years back). I'm not sure it's
worth it... people can always mine CVS to get an older version
when they get audited a couple years later ;)
If there is enough demand for that, perhaps a repo copy (and
then possibly rename some installed files as appropriate) of
the existing port from opentaxsolver to opentaxsolver2005
is the way to go. If that is desired I'll look into a repo
copy and any subsequent mods required to rename anything
that conflicts with the current version.
Most of the files, except the gui, have the tax year in the name.
So I may be able to just add to the port so versions from years past can
co-exist. I'll look into that, but I am comfortable with
committing this patch to update to tax year 2006 and add back
support for years gone by later.
>How-To-Repeat:
Apply patch below.
Do a test build.
Commit.
>Fix:
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /base/FreeBSD-CVS/ports/finance/opentaxsolver/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -p -r1.2 Makefile
--- Makefile24 Nov 2006 21:21:25 - 1.2
+++ Makefile7 Jan 2007 19:14:39 -
@@ -6,12 +6,11 @@
#
PORTNAME= ${UPPORTNAME:L}
-PORTVERSION= 3.08
+PORTVERSION= 4.01
CATEGORIES=finance
MASTER_SITES= ${MASTER_SITE_SOURCEFORGE}
MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR=opentaxsolver
-DISTNAME= ${UPPORTNAME}2005_${PORTVERSION}
-EXTRACT_SUFX= .tgz
+DISTNAME= ${UPPORTNAME}2006_${PORTVERSION}
MAINTAINER=[EMAIL PROTECTED]
COMMENT= US tax prep software
Index: distinfo
===
RCS file: /base/FreeBSD-CVS/ports/finance/opentaxsolver/distinfo,v
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -p -r1.2 distinfo
--- distinfo24 Nov 2006 21:21:25 - 1.2
+++ distinfo7 Jan 2007 17:53:49 -
@@ -1,3 +1,2 @@
-MD5 (OpenTaxSolver2005_3.08.tgz) = 7467cc72d85b2a88366046cf7c52719c
-SHA256 (OpenTaxSolver2005_3.08.tgz) =
01d691b367b82f818c0baa227a65189a04a68a02c7b8f6163b955e65901b1a03
-SIZE (OpenTaxSolver2005_3.08.tgz) = 224468
+MD5 (OpenTaxSolver2006_4.01.tar.gz) = 9ce67ed03a38c54cf1258051835615e0
+SIZE (OpenTaxSolver2006_4.01.tar.gz) = 180586
Index: pkg-plist
===
RCS file: /base/FreeBSD-CVS/ports/finance/opentaxsolver/pkg-plist,v
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -p -r1.2 pkg-plist
--- pkg-plist 24 Nov 2006 21:21:25 - 1.2
+++ pkg-plist 7 Jan 2007 17:53:49 -
@@ -1,53 +1,14 @@
bin/ots_gui
-bin/taxsolve_CA_540_2005
-bin/taxsolve_MA_1_2005
-bin/taxsolve_NJ_1040_2005
-bin/taxsolve_NY_IT201_2005
-bin/taxsolve_OH_IT1040_2005
-bin/taxsolve_PA_40_2005
-bin/taxsolve_US_1040_2005
-bin/taxsolve_US_1040_Sched_C_2005
-bin/taxsolve_VA_760_2005
+bin/taxsolve_US_1040_2006
+bin/taxsolve_US_1040_Sched_C_2006
share/ots/otslogo.ppm
-share/ots/examples_and_templates/CA_540/CA_540_2005_example.dat
-share/ots/examples_and_templates/CA_540/CA_540_2005_template.dat
-share/ots/examples_and_templates/CA_540/README_CA_540.txt
-share/ots/examples_and_templates/MA_1/MA_1_2005_example.dat
-share/ots/examples_and_templates/MA_1/MA_1_2005_template.dat
-share/ots/examples_and_templates/MA_1/README_MA_1.txt
-share/ots/examples_and_templates/NC_400/NC_400_2005_example.dat
-share/ots/examples_and_templates/NC_400/NC_400_2005_template.dat
-share/ots/examples_and_templates/NC_400/README_NC_400.txt
-share/ots/examples_and_templates/NJ_1040/NJ_1040_2005_example.dat
-share/ots/examples_and_templates/NJ_1040/NJ_1040_2005_template.dat
-share/ots/examples_and_templates/NJ_1040/README_NJ_1040.txt
-share/ots/examples_and_templates/NY_IT201/NY_IT201_2004_example.dat
-share/ots/examples_and_templates/NY_IT201/NY_IT201_2004_template.dat
-share/ots/examples_and_templates/NY_IT201/README_NY_IT201.txt
-share/ots/examples_and_templates/OH_1040/OH_IT1040_2005_example.dat
-share/ots/examples_and_templates/OH_1040/OH_IT1040_2005_template.dat
-share/ots/examples_and_templates/OH_1040/README_OH_IT1040.txt
-share/ots/examples_and_templates/PA_40/PA_40_2005_example.dat
-share/ots/examples_and_templates/PA_40/PA_40_2005_template.dat
-share/ots/examples_and_templates/PA_40/README_PA_40.txt
FreeBSD Port: sulci-0.5.a.20060221,1
Hello! Whether the port and when will be updated it? ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: gnutls (and all that kde stuff...) and 4.x's old gcc
Juergen Lock wrote: > (Not sure it still really matters given 4's eol date, but...) > > Yesterday evening I tinderboxed lang/gambas for 4.11 (thinking that > it was a compiler :) and it failed with C++ compiler errors in > libgnutlsxx in security/gnutls. I looked around in /usr/local/bin > and /usr/X11R6/bin and it seemed nothing was using it, so I put > USE_GCC=3.4 > in the port's Makefile, which made it build. Soo, should libgnutlsxx > just be removed from the build on 4, or should gnutls and everything > that depends on it (which seems to be all that kde stuff at least) > be given USE_GCC for 4? Or should gnutls simply be IGNOREd on 4 > since probably noone that still uses that wants to run kde anyway... ... or, the problem can be ignored at layer 9, since ports are no longer required to support 4.x, and its EOL is only 24 blessed days away. Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
test, please ignore
test, please ignore -- Regards, Vlad ___ Vlad V. TeteryaTET-RIPE ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Regarding dns/djbdns
Hello, I have contacted this e-mail address as this is what "make maintainer" gave me for "dns/djbdns". I just wanted to tell you that the IPv6 patch destroys the location facility (or views, in BIND terms) of tinydns. Considering the fact that IPv6 and locations are rarely used, I think that the best solution would be to simply warn the user. It wouldn't hurt to also inform upstream. Should you require further details or if I might be of any help, please don't hesitate to contact me. Thanks. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: pgdesigner for freebsd?
On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 04:16:07PM +0100, Thierry Thomas wrote: > Le Dim 7 jan 07 à 15:23:10 +0100, Juergen Lock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > écrivait : > > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write: > > >Hello, > > Hello, > > > >I see that pgdesigner is NOT available in the ports... It requires > > >gambas that is available so I guess there would not mean a lot of work > > >to have a FBSD fix/patch. > > > > > >Any plans to offer the community this software? > > >Best regards, > > > > > >http://sourceforge.net/projects/pgdesigner > > > > Ok I briefly looked at this, but the file GAMBAS.VERSION in it > > says 1.9.43 (which is a development version), while 1.0.17_2 is in > > ports. And I'm not in the mood to make a gambas-devel port, given > > that my last experience with basic was many more than 10 years ago... :) > > (maintainer Cc'd.) > > I have a port of gambas-devel v. 1.9.46a which is ready (i.e. buildable > and installable), but it does not run perfectly. I have been working > with the author, and we already fixed some issues, but it's not yet > fully usable. > > I have never tried pgdesigner, but the runtime part seems OK with the > included examples: if you want to try it, I can send you the port "as > is". Yeah why not, tho of course it will have to be committed if we want to make pgdesigner a port too. Juergen ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
sim-im-devel port bug
Hello Alexey V. Panfilov, I built the sim-im-devel port today (newest ports tree) to replace the working stable sim-im but It crashes everytime after some minutes of using. This is the backtrace: System: 6.1-STABLE FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE #8: Mon May 8 11:58:38 MSD 2006 *** [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/local/bin/sim /tmp/1001.sim.core GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD] Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions. Type "show copying" to see the conditions. There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as "i386-marcel-freebsd"...(no debugging symbols found)... Core was generated by `sim'. Program terminated with signal 6, Aborted. Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libsim.so.0...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libsim.so.0 Reading symbols from /usr/X11R6/lib/libqt-mt.so.3...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/X11R6/lib/libqt-mt.so.3 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libpng.so.5...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libpng.so.5 Reading symbols from /usr/X11R6/lib/libXext.so.6...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/X11R6/lib/libXext.so.6 Reading symbols from /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 Reading symbols from /usr/X11R6/lib/libSM.so.6...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/X11R6/lib/libSM.so.6 Reading symbols from /usr/X11R6/lib/libICE.so.6...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/X11R6/lib/libICE.so.6 Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libpthread.so.2...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libpthread.so.2 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libxslt.so.2...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libxslt.so.2 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libxml2.so.5...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libxml2.so.5 Reading symbols from /lib/libz.so.3...done. Loaded symbols for /lib/libz.so.3 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libiconv.so.3...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libiconv.so.3 Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libssl.so.4...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libssl.so.4 Reading symbols from /lib/libcrypto.so.4...done. Loaded symbols for /lib/libcrypto.so.4 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libjpeg.so.9...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libjpeg.so.9 Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.5...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.5 Reading symbols from /lib/libm.so.4...done. Loaded symbols for /lib/libm.so.4 Reading symbols from /lib/libc.so.6...done. Loaded symbols for /lib/libc.so.6 Reading symbols from /usr/X11R6/lib/libaudio.so.2...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/X11R6/lib/libaudio.so.2 Reading symbols from /usr/X11R6/lib/libXt.so.6...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/X11R6/lib/libXt.so.6 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libmng.so.1...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libmng.so.1 Reading symbols from /usr/X11R6/lib/libXi.so.6...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/X11R6/lib/libXi.so.6 Reading symbols from /usr/X11R6/lib/libXrender.so.1...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/X11R6/lib/libXrender.so.1 Reading symbols from /usr/X11R6/lib/libXrandr.so.2...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/X11R6/lib/libXrandr.so.2 Reading symbols from /usr/X11R6/lib/libXcursor.so.1...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/X11R6/lib/libXcursor.so.1 Reading symbols from /usr/X11R6/lib/libXinerama.so.1...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/X11R6/lib/libXinerama.so.1 Reading symbols from /usr/X11R6/lib/libXft.so.2...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/X11R6/lib/libXft.so.2 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libfreetype.so.9...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libfreetype.so.9 Reading symbols from /usr/X11R6/lib/libfontconfig.so.1...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/X11R6/lib/libfontconfig.so.1 Reading symbols from /usr/X11R6/lib/libXau.so.0...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/X11R6/lib/libXau.so.0 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/liblcms.so.1...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/liblcms.so.1 Reading symbols from /usr/X11R6/lib/libXfixes.so.3...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/X11R6/lib/libXfixes.so.3 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libexpat.so.6...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libexpat.so.6 Reading symbols from /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/locale/lib/common/xlcDef.so.2...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/locale/lib/common/xlcDef.so.2 Reading symbols from /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/locale/lib/common/ximcp.so.2...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/locale/lib/common/ximcp.so.2 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/sim/__homedir.so...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/sim/__homedir.so Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/sim/__migrate.so...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/sim/__migrate.so Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/sim/_core.so...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/sim/_core.so Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/kde3/plugins/styles/keramik.so...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/kde3/plugins/styles/keramik.so Reading sym
Re: SCons build, help needed
Hi, Thank you very much for your suggestion, I have sent pr but get declination from the port maintainer because he is in progress in upgrading to 2.43 directly. :-) Let's waiting for the 2.43! Tz-Huan On 1/5/07, Karel Miklav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Tz-Huan Huang wrote: > I have made a port based on yours, please test it if free. Congratulations and big thank you! The port looks OK, but my desktop machine is hosed and I was not able to build it. I suggest you to: - replace my name and email in the makefile with yours :) - fix the pkg-descr; check the first paragraph on http://blender.org - submit the PR -- Regards, Karel miklav ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
