Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-309: Adding Pulsar Client Stats Reporter
I've replied in the PR it self On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 2:24 AM Ying wrote: > Hi dev, > > Currently, Pulsar Client can provide recorded stats for both Producer and > Consumer, but not all stats are fixed values during the statsInterval. So > start the PIP-309 to add the Pulsar Client Stats Reporter to allow all > stats being reported precisely at the end of each interval. > > Please share your thoughts! > > Ref: > PIP-309 https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21393 > > Thanks, > ywango >
Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-310: Support custom publish rate limiters
Replied in PR. On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 3:51 PM Girish Sharma wrote: > Hi, > Currently, there are only 2 kinds of publish rate limiters - polling based > and precise. Users have an option to use either one of them in the topic > publish rate limiter, but the resource group rate limiter only uses polling > one. > > There are challenges with both the rate limiters and the fact that we can't > use precise rate limiter in the resource group level. > > Thus, in order to support custom rate limiters, I've created the PIP-310 > > This is the discussion thread. Please go through the PIP and provide your > inputs. > > Link - https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21399 > > Regards > -- > Girish Sharma >
Re: [VOTE] PIP-304: Make PublishContext provide the message metadata
Hi, kecona, I have left some comments on the GitHub PR. Thanks, Penghui On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 9:44 AM kecona wrote: > Hi all, > > This thread is to start a vote for PIP-304. > > PIP: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21311 > Discussion thread: > https://lists.apache.org/thread/72szlzc0rw1hbn4v0w54qgq93cn9k4px > > Thanks, > kecona >
[VOTE] PIP-298 Consumer supports specifying consumption isolation level
Dave previously mentioned in the discussion thread that he will continue to support this pip if the documentation is supplemented and improved. Due to inability to contact him, we apply to cancel his -1 binding. Replied Message | From | Dave Fisher | | Date | 09/26/2023 04:03 | | To | dev@pulsar.apache.org | | Cc | | | Subject | Re: [VOTE] PIP-298 Consumer supports specifying consumption isolation level | -1 (binding) I’m not convinced that breaking transaction isolation is the proper course of action. Regards, Dave > On Sep 25, 2023, at 6:46 AM, hzh0425 wrote: > > Hi dev, > This thread is to start a vote for PIP-298 Consumer supports specifying > consumption isolation level > Discuss thread: > https://lists.apache.org/thread/8ny0qtp7m9qcdbvnfjdvpnkc4c5ssyld > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/2opqjof83425vry6gzszd5glqgryrv11 > > PIP: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21114 > > BR, > hzh
[Discuss] Release Pulsar C++ Client 3.4.0
I would like to propose releasing the Pulsar C++ Client 3.4.0. It has been about 3 months since the last release. There have been many new features and bug fixes since then. Besides, from my own perspective, it's better to let Python and Node.js clients depend on this new version of C++ client. Especially I observed that the topic name was not shown correctly many times recently, which are fixed by https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-cpp/pull/331 and https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-cpp/pull/329. So it's time to release a new version. Please let me know if you have any PRs that need to be included in 3.4.0 Thanks, Yunze
Re: [VOTE] PIP-298 Consumer supports specifying consumption isolation level
+1 (binding) Regards, Penghui On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 10:37 AM hzh0425 wrote: > Dave previously mentioned in the discussion thread that he will continue > to support this pip if the documentation is supplemented and improved. Due > to inability to contact him, we apply to cancel his -1 binding. > > > > Replied Message > | From | Dave Fisher | > | Date | 09/26/2023 04:03 | > | To | dev@pulsar.apache.org | > | Cc | | > | Subject | Re: [VOTE] PIP-298 Consumer supports specifying consumption > isolation level | > -1 (binding) I’m not convinced that breaking transaction isolation is the > proper course of action. > > Regards, > Dave > > > On Sep 25, 2023, at 6:46 AM, hzh0425 wrote: > > > > Hi dev, > > This thread is to start a vote for PIP-298 Consumer supports specifying > consumption isolation level > > Discuss thread: > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/8ny0qtp7m9qcdbvnfjdvpnkc4c5ssyld > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/2opqjof83425vry6gzszd5glqgryrv11 > > > > PIP: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21114 > > > > BR, > > hzh >
Re: [Discuss] Release Pulsar C++ Client 3.4.0
Thanks for driving the release, +1 Penghui On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 11:00 AM Yunze Xu wrote: > I would like to propose releasing the Pulsar C++ Client 3.4.0. It has > been about 3 months since the last release. There have been many new > features and bug fixes since then. > > Besides, from my own perspective, it's better to let Python and > Node.js clients depend on this new version of C++ client. Especially I > observed that the topic name was not shown correctly many times > recently, which are fixed by > https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-cpp/pull/331 and > https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-cpp/pull/329. > > So it's time to release a new version. Please let me know if you have > any PRs that need to be included in 3.4.0 > > Thanks, > Yunze >
Re: [VOTE] PIP-298 Consumer supports specifying consumption isolation level
+1 (binding) Thanks, Yunze On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 1:08 PM PengHui Li wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > Regards, > Penghui > > On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 10:37 AM hzh0425 wrote: > > > Dave previously mentioned in the discussion thread that he will continue > > to support this pip if the documentation is supplemented and improved. Due > > to inability to contact him, we apply to cancel his -1 binding. > > > > > > > > Replied Message > > | From | Dave Fisher | > > | Date | 09/26/2023 04:03 | > > | To | dev@pulsar.apache.org | > > | Cc | | > > | Subject | Re: [VOTE] PIP-298 Consumer supports specifying consumption > > isolation level | > > -1 (binding) I’m not convinced that breaking transaction isolation is the > > proper course of action. > > > > Regards, > > Dave > > > > > On Sep 25, 2023, at 6:46 AM, hzh0425 wrote: > > > > > > Hi dev, > > > This thread is to start a vote for PIP-298 Consumer supports specifying > > consumption isolation level > > > Discuss thread: > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/8ny0qtp7m9qcdbvnfjdvpnkc4c5ssyld > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/2opqjof83425vry6gzszd5glqgryrv11 > > > > > > PIP: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21114 > > > > > > BR, > > > hzh > >
Re: [Discuss] Release Pulsar C++ Client 3.4.0
+1, BR, Zike Yang On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 1:10 PM PengHui Li wrote: > > Thanks for driving the release, > > +1 > > Penghui > > On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 11:00 AM Yunze Xu wrote: > > > I would like to propose releasing the Pulsar C++ Client 3.4.0. It has > > been about 3 months since the last release. There have been many new > > features and bug fixes since then. > > > > Besides, from my own perspective, it's better to let Python and > > Node.js clients depend on this new version of C++ client. Especially I > > observed that the topic name was not shown correctly many times > > recently, which are fixed by > > https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-cpp/pull/331 and > > https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-cpp/pull/329. > > > > So it's time to release a new version. Please let me know if you have > > any PRs that need to be included in 3.4.0 > > > > Thanks, > > Yunze > >
