Re: Request a actual Build for Mac OS

2013-11-15 Thread Jürgen Schmidt 
On 11/15/13 4:06 AM, Raphael Bircher wrote:
> Hi all
> 
> I'm not able to build with Mac OS X 10.5 anymore. We have rised the
> Pyton requestment for OpenOffic and it's not easy to upgrade the python
> on this machine. The other build machin is not seted up to build against
> 10.4. But I want to have a actual build from truck for automated tests.
> Can someone offer such builds to me.

can you try again and update configure.in first (update, autoconf, ...)
I hope it works now for you using the system Python. And please let me
know if it works

Juergen

> 
> The Windows and Linux builds I can take from the buildbot.
> 
> Greetings Raphael
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Proposal

2013-11-15 Thread Juan de Val Cremades 
Good morning,
I am Juan Carlos de Val, a Mechanical Engineering student who has an idea
and wants to begin being a entrepreneur.
My question was about your legacy, because I don´t know if I would be able
to use your software to offer it (obviously 100% for free) but on a new
platform.

Thank you very much.

Juan Carlos de Val
Telf.:
Spain +34 619 67 59 82
Italy: +39 388 956 0099
juancarlos.de...@gmail.com

Re: buildbots -- Linux and MacOSX

2013-11-15 Thread Glenn Harvey Liwanag 
School for the week is over. Let me just configure this SVN repo thing (I
use Git, sorry) and the whole environment.

A couple of questions

   - Am I right to presume that I need the 4 GB trunk to start building?
   - What set of details do you guys need from me?



On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 2:01 AM, Kay Schenk  wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 6:33 PM, Glenn Harvey Liwanag <
> glennharveyliwa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I can try building the thing on my Mac OS X if that's what you're looking
> > for. It's my only computer right now and I use it for school so I have to
> > know first the average build time and the instructions to get the whole
> > thing done without academics interfering with the work.
> >
>
> Thanks for this offer! Resources used for building are dependent on your
> system, but typically it would take about 2 hours for a full build.
>
> Information on how to obtain the source and a link to the Building Guide
> can be found on the project source page:
>
>  http://openoffice.apache.org/source.html
>
> Please let us know how this goes for you.
>
>
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 9:08 AM, Kay Schenk 
> wrote:
> >
> > > Regarding Jürgen's comments  on a recent thread --
> > >
> > > http://markmail.org/message/v5zli2np67qv5ryz
> > >
> > > Since  CentOS 5 is our reference distribution for delivered Linux
> > binaries
> > > (I did not know this!) -- and I am assuming this distro might remain as
> > the
> > > reference going forward, does it make sense to try to move forward to
> set
> > > this up as a buildbot. I know wokr had already started on this. Can
> > someone
> > > give us an update?
> > >
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6217
> > >
> > > I don't know CentOS, but having about 18  years in various *nixes
> HP/UX,
> > > Solaris, RedHat, SuSE), I could probably help assuming I could work in
> > > command line only to deal with this.
> > >
> > > On the MacOSX front, the latest update indicates we don't have hardware
> > :(
> > >
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-4902
> > >
> > > Any suggestions? Volunteers with equipment to dedicate to this?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > >
> >
> -
> > > MzK
> > >
> > > “Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot,
> > >  Nothing is going to get better. It's not.”
> > >   -- Dr. Seuss, The Lorax
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> -
> MzK
>
> “Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot,
>  Nothing is going to get better. It's not.”
>   -- Dr. Seuss, The Lorax
>

[code] build breaker on Linux 64bit in introduced ia2 code

2013-11-15 Thread Oliver-Rainer Wittmann 

Hi Steve,

can you please have look at the build breaker on Linux 64bit, found by 
our corresponding Linux 64bit build bot.


The build breaks in module accessibility.
The relevante build output is:

...
Compiling: accessibility/source/standard/vclxaccessiblelist.cxx
...
/home/buildslave19/slave19/openofficeorg-nightly/build/main/accessibility/source/standard/vclxaccessiblelist.cxx: 
In member function 'virtual void 
VCLXAccessibleList::ProcessWindowEvent(const VclWindowEvent&, bool)':
/home/buildslave19/slave19/openofficeorg-nightly/build/main/accessibility/source/standard/vclxaccessiblelist.cxx:372: 
error: cast from 'void*' to 'sal_uInt32' loses precision
/home/buildslave19/slave19/openofficeorg-nightly/build/main/accessibility/source/standard/vclxaccessiblelist.cxx: 
At global scope:
/home/buildslave19/slave19/openofficeorg-nightly/build/main/accessibility/source/standard/vclxaccessiblelist.cxx:606: 
warning: unused parameter 'bItemInserted'
/home/buildslave19/slave19/openofficeorg-nightly/build/main/accessibility/source/standard/vclxaccessiblelist.cxx:606: 
warning: unused parameter 'nIndex'
dmake:  Error code 1, while making 
'../../unxlngx6.pro/slo/vclxaccessiblelist.obj'



Until the next Linux 64bit build bot is started, the complete build 
output can be found at [1].


[1] 
http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/buildlogs/linux64/main/accessibility/unxlngx6.pro/misc/logs/source.standard.txt



Thanks in advance.

Best regards, Oliver.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [code] build breaker on Linux 64bit in introduced ia2 code

2013-11-15 Thread Oliver-Rainer Wittmann 

Hi,

kudos to Herbert.

While I have written the below message Herbert has already provided the 
fix - see revision 1542228


Steve, may be you can have an additional look at the unused parameters.

Best regards, Oliver.

On 15.11.2013 12:09, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:

Hi Steve,

can you please have look at the build breaker on Linux 64bit, found by
our corresponding Linux 64bit build bot.

The build breaks in module accessibility.
The relevante build output is:

...
Compiling: accessibility/source/standard/vclxaccessiblelist.cxx
...
/home/buildslave19/slave19/openofficeorg-nightly/build/main/accessibility/source/standard/vclxaccessiblelist.cxx:
In member function 'virtual void
VCLXAccessibleList::ProcessWindowEvent(const VclWindowEvent&, bool)':
/home/buildslave19/slave19/openofficeorg-nightly/build/main/accessibility/source/standard/vclxaccessiblelist.cxx:372:
error: cast from 'void*' to 'sal_uInt32' loses precision
/home/buildslave19/slave19/openofficeorg-nightly/build/main/accessibility/source/standard/vclxaccessiblelist.cxx:
At global scope:
/home/buildslave19/slave19/openofficeorg-nightly/build/main/accessibility/source/standard/vclxaccessiblelist.cxx:606:
warning: unused parameter 'bItemInserted'
/home/buildslave19/slave19/openofficeorg-nightly/build/main/accessibility/source/standard/vclxaccessiblelist.cxx:606:
warning: unused parameter 'nIndex'
dmake:  Error code 1, while making
'../../unxlngx6.pro/slo/vclxaccessiblelist.obj'


Until the next Linux 64bit build bot is started, the complete build
output can be found at [1].

[1]
http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/buildlogs/linux64/main/accessibility/unxlngx6.pro/misc/logs/source.standard.txt



Thanks in advance.

Best regards, Oliver.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Apache OpenOffice 4.1 to Bring Enhanced Accessibility Support

2013-11-15 Thread Rob Weir 
Our latest blog post:

https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/entry/apache_openoffice_4_1_to

This accessibility code has now been integrated into the trunk.  This
is a great step forward.  If you refresh yourself on our posted Public
Service Mission, you see that accessibility is a key priority for us:

http://openoffice.apache.org/mission.html

This code came from IBM's contribution of Lotus Symphony, but much
effort was required to integrate it into OpenOffice.  Our thanks go to
Steve Yin for the development work and to V Stuart Foote, James Teh,
Jean-Philippe Mengual and Liu Ping for their expertise on testing.
(And profuse apologies if I missed anyone)

Regards.

-Rob

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: buildbots -- Linux and MacOSX

2013-11-15 Thread Rob Weir 
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 9:33 PM, Glenn Harvey Liwanag
 wrote:
> I can try building the thing on my Mac OS X if that's what you're looking
> for. It's my only computer right now and I use it for school so I have to
> know first the average build time and the instructions to get the whole
> thing done without academics interfering with the work.
>

A "buildbot" is a server that does automated builds for us in a secure
environment.  So it is more complicated than a build environment set
up on an developer's machine.

That said, you are welcome to set up a build environment on your own
machine if you are interested in helping with bug fixes or things like
that.

Regards,

-Rob

>
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 9:08 AM, Kay Schenk  wrote:
>
>> Regarding Jürgen's comments  on a recent thread --
>>
>> http://markmail.org/message/v5zli2np67qv5ryz
>>
>> Since  CentOS 5 is our reference distribution for delivered Linux binaries
>> (I did not know this!) -- and I am assuming this distro might remain as the
>> reference going forward, does it make sense to try to move forward to set
>> this up as a buildbot. I know wokr had already started on this. Can someone
>> give us an update?
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6217
>>
>> I don't know CentOS, but having about 18  years in various *nixes HP/UX,
>> Solaris, RedHat, SuSE), I could probably help assuming I could work in
>> command line only to deal with this.
>>
>> On the MacOSX front, the latest update indicates we don't have hardware :(
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-4902
>>
>> Any suggestions? Volunteers with equipment to dedicate to this?
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> -
>> MzK
>>
>> “Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot,
>>  Nothing is going to get better. It's not.”
>>   -- Dr. Seuss, The Lorax
>>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [Proposal] Update 'Get It Here' Banner

2013-11-15 Thread Samer Mansour 
Ok no one voted +1 nor -1 explicitly, but it sounds like people are happy
with the new banner.


On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Samer Mansour  wrote:

> Hey everyone,
>
> Just realized the 'get it here' image is out dated.  So I whipped together
> a new banner with a design I've been using with our social media pages.
>
> This is the current banner:
> http://openoffice.apache.org/images/get-it-here/en.png (from
> http://openoffice.apache.org/get-it-here.html)
>
> This is what I'm proposing to replace:
> http://dynomie.com/ext/getithere2.png
>
> I would replace the current one with the same dimensions so that it
> updates nicely on other sites with the existing logo code (if they pointed
> to our hosted image).
>
> Lazy consensus as usual, 72 hours.
>
> Samer Mansour
>

Re: Apache OpenOffice 4.1 to Bring Enhanced Accessibility Support

2013-11-15 Thread V Stuart Foote 
Rob,

Great news! Great blog post--subtle ;-)

On a side bar, I see that Herbert and Oliver are hard at work correcting
build issues for Steve's rev 1541847 integration done yesterday, getting the
new IAccessible2 bridge to build cleanly on trunk is obviously now the
priority.   But when someone gets a chance there are several source files
from the merge that will need to have ALv2 headers inserted--don't want the
down stream folks to complain too loudly...

Stuart

Here is a working list of the ones I've reviewed, they've all still got the
LGPLv3 headers:

/aoo-trunk/main/editeng/inc/editeng/AccessibleSvxFindReplaceDialog.hxx

  
/aoo-trunk/main/offapi/com/sun/star/accessibility/MSAAService.idl

  
/aoo-trunk/main/offapi/com/sun/star/accessibility/XAccessibleExtendedAttributes.idl

  
/aoo-trunk/main/offapi/com/sun/star/accessibility/XAccessibleGetAccFlowTo.idl

  
/aoo-trunk/main/offapi/com/sun/star/accessibility/XAccessibleGroupPosition.idl

  
/aoo-trunk/main/offapi/com/sun/star/accessibility/XAccessibleTableSelection.idl

  
/aoo-trunk/main/offapi/com/sun/star/accessibility/XAccessibleTextSelection.idl

  
/aoo-trunk/main/offapi/com/sun/star/accessibility/XMSAAService.idl

  
/aoo-trunk/main/svtools/inc/svtools/accessibleruler.hxx

  
/aoo-trunk/main/svtools/inc/svtools/vclxaccessibleheaderbar.hxx

  
/aoo-trunk/main/svtools/inc/svtools/vclxaccessibleheaderbaritem.hxx

  
/aoo-trunk/main/svtools/source/control/accessibleruler.cxx

  
/aoo-trunk/main/svtools/source/control/ruler.src

  
/aoo-trunk/main/svtools/source/control/vclxaccessibleheaderbar.cxx

  
/aoo-trunk/main/svtools/source/control/vclxaccessibleheaderbaritem.cxx

  
/aoo-trunk/main/svx/source/inc/svxpixelctlaccessiblecontext.hxx

  
/aoo-trunk/main/sw/source/core/access/accfield.cxx

  
/aoo-trunk/main/sw/source/core/access/accfield.hxx

  
/aoo-trunk/main/sw/source/core/access/accnotexthyperlink.cxx

  
/aoo-trunk/main/sw/source/core/access/accnotexthyperlink.hxx

  



--
View this message in context: 
http://openoffice.2283327.n4.nabble.com/Apache-OpenOffice-4-1-to-Bring-Enhanced-Accessibility-Support-tp4655818p4655825.html
Sent from the Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Build braker in rejuvenate01 cppu

2013-11-15 Thread Herbert Duerr 

Just a small status update to my mail from Tuesday:

On 12.11.2013 10:17, Herbert Dürr wrote:

On 11.11.2013 10:47, Raphael Bircher wrote:

I run in a build breaker in the rejuvenate01 branche

dmake:  Error: -- `uno_purpenvhelpers5abi.map' not found, and can't be
made


I just committed r1540968 to add the missing file by renaming its older
cousin.


Has someone a idea what happend here, and what's wrong?

[...]
Thanks for looking into the "rejuvenate01" branch. With the renaming and
the recent major update from trunk it has become a "construction site"
though. After the RmMoz work I can now focus on getting the branch round
again and make it a viable port. So stay tuned, in a few days it will
build+run out of the box again and it will have gained an important
feature it missed so far: support for password protected documents!


The rejuvenate01 branch should build out of the box again. Note the 
working support for password protected documents and the latest goodies 
we got by resyncing to trunk.


Herbert

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Apache OpenOffice 4.1 to Bring Enhanced Accessibility Support

2013-11-15 Thread Herbert Duerr 

On 15.11.2013 17:06, V Stuart Foote wrote:

Rob,

Great news! Great blog post--subtle ;-)

On a side bar, I see that Herbert and Oliver are hard at work correcting
build issues for Steve's rev 1541847 integration done yesterday, getting the
new IAccessible2 bridge to build cleanly on trunk is obviously now the
priority.   But when someone gets a chance there are several source files
from the merge that will need to have ALv2 headers inserted--don't want the
down stream folks to complain too loudly...


Good point, thanks for finding it!

I fixed the license headers to the ALv2 as intended and moved the 
SNAPSHOT tag to the new revision. The next SNAPSHOT build is expected to 
be ready for downloading and testing next Monday evening.


Have a great weekend and have fun with the next SNAPSHOT build!

Herbert

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [code] solution for issue 33737 - in-place editing of Input Fields

2013-11-15 Thread Oliver-Rainer Wittmann 

Hi,

On 13.11.2013 14:56, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:

Hi,

On 07.11.2013 18:21, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:

Hi,

I am working on a solution for issue 33737 [1] and I am making good
progress.
I have started the documentation of the solution in our wiki - please
have a look at https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Writer/Input_Fields. It
should be almost complete - may be I have forgotten the one or the other
which will follow when I get notice of its missing.
If you are interested in this area, please have a look and provide
feedback.
Thanks in advance.

[1] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=33737




I have finished the implementation.
Unfortunately, my test on MacOS X reveals some problems:
- special characters inserted for improved cursor traveling are more or
less visible
- traveling from one Input Field to the other skips one Input Fields.
This happens on forward and backward traveling.

Thus, I back on the coding. I assume to solve the problems at least
until the end of the week.



I have solved the problem on MacOS X.
I will check the final code changes on the major platforms (Windows, 
Linux and MacOS X). I expect that the code changes will be committed 
into trunk at the beginning of next week.


Best regards, Oliver.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: buildbots -- Linux and MacOSX

2013-11-15 Thread Andrew Rist 
I wanted to give an update on the buildbots, as this is a question that 
keeps coming up.


 * We've received assurances that the Mac buildbot is coming. Long
   story short, the current mac hardware is a bit long in the tooth and
   we would kill everything on it if we added our builds to the current
   machine.  We are waiting for real hardware in the form of a Mac Pro
   which will enable us to have multiple virtualized mac bots, giving
   us our own environment that can be set up for AOO.  The machine
   should be ordered by the end of the year - bot should come up early
   next year - ish...
 * We are also waiting on a CentOS bot to create our standard Linux
   build.  This has been requested and is in the works, and Jan has
   agreed to bring this up in discussions with infra.  I am hoping we
   can have this for the 4.1 release timeframe.
 * FreeBSD bot - we have a new freebsd bot and it is slowly moving
   toward building without errors.  If anyone has suggestions for
   fixing issues on there, please post to dev and we'll move that
   forward.  We are currently stuck on Hunspell -
   
http://ci.apache.org/builders/openoffice-fbsd-nightly/builds/91/steps/configure/logs/stdio
   and
   
http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/buildlogs/fbsdn/log/unxfbsdx.pro.build.html
 * The hung process issue with the windows buildbots seems to solved
   now, and has not been a problem lately.
 * Currently the Windows bots are failing - but this seems to an issue
   of svn getting out of sync, I'm cleaning up the bot and restarting
   the machine after some updates - I expect this to clean up the
   current issues.  (
 * Snapshots - both linux and windoze are currently having issues in
   terms of the size of files that the build creates.  The standard
   buildbot directory upload routine zips the directory, uploads it,
   and unzips at the destination.  Our directory of install bits has
   gotten too large and we are running into an exception on this
   step.   (On long term fix is to create our own custom directory
   upload code for build bot - but that is another discussion...)  The
   short term solution is to split the snapshot build into two builds 
   (possible in a single flow) and build half the languages in each

   build - this should get us around the space issue.

That's all for now
A.



On 11/13/2013 10:01 AM, Kay Schenk wrote:

On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 6:33 PM, Glenn Harvey Liwanag <
glennharveyliwa...@gmail.com> wrote:


I can try building the thing on my Mac OS X if that's what you're looking
for. It's my only computer right now and I use it for school so I have to
know first the average build time and the instructions to get the whole
thing done without academics interfering with the work.


Thanks for this offer! Resources used for building are dependent on your
system, but typically it would take about 2 hours for a full build.

Information on how to obtain the source and a link to the Building Guide
can be found on the project source page:

  http://openoffice.apache.org/source.html

Please let us know how this goes for you.



On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 9:08 AM, Kay Schenk  wrote:


Regarding Jürgen's comments  on a recent thread --

http://markmail.org/message/v5zli2np67qv5ryz

Since  CentOS 5 is our reference distribution for delivered Linux

binaries

(I did not know this!) -- and I am assuming this distro might remain as

the

reference going forward, does it make sense to try to move forward to set
this up as a buildbot. I know wokr had already started on this. Can

someone

give us an update?

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6217

I don't know CentOS, but having about 18  years in various *nixes HP/UX,
Solaris, RedHat, SuSE), I could probably help assuming I could work in
command line only to deal with this.

On the MacOSX front, the latest update indicates we don't have hardware

:(

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-4902

Any suggestions? Volunteers with equipment to dedicate to this?



--



-

MzK

“Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot,
  Nothing is going to get better. It's not.”
   -- Dr. Seuss, The Lorax

Re: [discuss] drop support for Java 5 and Java 6 for Windows

2013-11-15 Thread Kay Schenk 
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 11:53 PM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann <
orwittm...@googlemail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
>
> On 15.11.2013 08:38, janI wrote:
>
>> On 15 November 2013 08:25, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann <
>> orwittm...@googlemail.com
>>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>
>>  Hi,
>>>
>>>
>>> On 15.11.2013 00:54, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>>
>>>  On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 11:26 PM, janI  wrote:

   On 14 November 2013 03:32, Kay Schenk  wrote:

>
>   On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 5:11 AM, Andrea Pescetti <
> pesce...@apache.org
>
>>
>>  wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>   On 12/09/2013 Kay Schenk wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>   Did we reach a consensus on this one?
>>>
 Wait until 4.1 to "officially" change java build environment to 7?
 Buildbots are still at 6, although I know some of us are using 7 for
 building with no problems.


  We didn't reach consensus, the reason being (rather than
>>> disagreement)
>>> that it's unclear:
>>> - what the proposal is about exactly
>>> - what's broken in the current setup
>>> - what's the impact on people who wish to build OpenOffice
>>> - what's the impact on people who wish to use OpenOffice
>>>
>>> Now, after yet another discussion where we explain Java to each
>>> other,
>>>
>>>  we
>>
>
>  can take for granted that we all know about it and move on and see
>> what
>>
>>>
>>>  the
>>
>>  proposal is about in concrete, so that is can be evaluated properly
>>> and
>>> maybe implemented in time for 4.1.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Andrea.
>>>
>>>
>>> 
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>>   OK, I'm back on this old thread. The thing is the security
>>>
>> considerations
>> do not just apply to Windows.  I suggest we switch to java 7 as
>> default
>>
>>  and
>
>  change the settings for "javacompiler" in configure.in appropriately
>> to
>> deal with this.
>>
>> Although by default, I build with java 7, I will make this change
>> locally
>> and see what happens.
>>
>>
>>  +1, so we use java 7 for development, but the final installation
> still
> runs
> with both java 6 and java 7.
>
> rgds
> jan I.
>
>
>  Well, in theory, yes. In practice -- I guess not. :(

 I changed my configure.in etc and rebuilt. Then a final stop with this
 message --

javac: source release 1.7 requires target release 1.7

 in module jvmfwk


 The man page for javac (openJDK 7)has this info talks about "default"
 values for targets depending on source...here are the last bits of that

 o If -source is 1.5, the value of -target is 1.7

o If -source is 1.6, the value of -target is 1.7

o For all other values of -source, the value of -target is the value
 of
 -source.

 but no specific information  saying iyou can NOT specify a target value
 that is below your source value.

 I imagine this is universal and not just specific to openJDK but I don't
 know for sure.

 Any other ideas?


  On my attempt to build on Windows with Java 1.7 (Windows 7 64bit Home
>>> Premium VM) I did the following:
>>> After having setup the build environment via configure, bootstrap and
>>> sourcing the creating 'winenv.set.sh' I set the environment variable
>>> JAVAFLAGS to "-source 1.5 -target 1.5" by command
>>> - export JAVAFLAGS='-source 1.5 -target 1.5'
>>>
>>> My build was sucessfull and the resulting installation set worked on a
>>> different Windows machine with Java 1.6
>>>
>>>
>> I have done a similar thing on ubuntu 12.04, manually modified
>> LinuxX86-64Env.Set.sh and it builds correctly.
>>
>>
>>
>>> Unfortunately, I did not continued my work on it - e.g.
>>> - detecting the Java version during configure
>>> - setting JAVAFLAGS automatically depending on the detected Java version
>>>
>>>
>> It seems the right place to do this is configure.in. But why detect
>> version, why not simple set the flags ?
>>
>>
> Yes, you are right.
> When it works in the build environment with all the different Java
> versions this is the simply solution.
>
>
>
> Best regards, Oliver.
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>
>

Unfortunately for this little trial, I apparently misunderstood the
reasoning, and did this --

javac -source 1.7 -target 1.5

which javac got upset with, and thus my error.

On the other hand, I did get a lot of warnings (I use verbose build option)
-- not perman

Re: buildbots -- Linux and MacOSX

2013-11-15 Thread Kay Schenk 
[top posting]
Thank you for this update! :)



On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 9:54 AM, Andrew Rist  wrote:

> I wanted to give an update on the buildbots, as this is a question that
> keeps coming up.
>
>  * We've received assurances that the Mac buildbot is coming. Long
>story short, the current mac hardware is a bit long in the tooth and
>we would kill everything on it if we added our builds to the current
>machine.  We are waiting for real hardware in the form of a Mac Pro
>which will enable us to have multiple virtualized mac bots, giving
>us our own environment that can be set up for AOO.  The machine
>should be ordered by the end of the year - bot should come up early
>next year - ish...
>  * We are also waiting on a CentOS bot to create our standard Linux
>build.  This has been requested and is in the works, and Jan has
>agreed to bring this up in discussions with infra.  I am hoping we
>can have this for the 4.1 release timeframe.
>  * FreeBSD bot - we have a new freebsd bot and it is slowly moving
>toward building without errors.  If anyone has suggestions for
>fixing issues on there, please post to dev and we'll move that
>forward.  We are currently stuck on Hunspell -
>http://ci.apache.org/builders/openoffice-fbsd-nightly/
> builds/91/steps/configure/logs/stdio
>and
>http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/buildlogs/fbsdn/
> log/unxfbsdx.pro.build.html
>  * The hung process issue with the windows buildbots seems to solved
>now, and has not been a problem lately.
>  * Currently the Windows bots are failing - but this seems to an issue
>of svn getting out of sync, I'm cleaning up the bot and restarting
>the machine after some updates - I expect this to clean up the
>current issues.  (
>  * Snapshots - both linux and windoze are currently having issues in
>terms of the size of files that the build creates.  The standard
>buildbot directory upload routine zips the directory, uploads it,
>and unzips at the destination.  Our directory of install bits has
>gotten too large and we are running into an exception on this
>step.   (On long term fix is to create our own custom directory
>upload code for build bot - but that is another discussion...)  The
>short term solution is to split the snapshot build into two builds
>  (possible in a single flow) and build half the languages in each
>build - this should get us around the space issue.
>
> That's all for now
> A.
>
>
>
> On 11/13/2013 10:01 AM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 6:33 PM, Glenn Harvey Liwanag <
>> glennharveyliwa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>  I can try building the thing on my Mac OS X if that's what you're looking
>>> for. It's my only computer right now and I use it for school so I have to
>>> know first the average build time and the instructions to get the whole
>>> thing done without academics interfering with the work.
>>>
>>>  Thanks for this offer! Resources used for building are dependent on your
>> system, but typically it would take about 2 hours for a full build.
>>
>> Information on how to obtain the source and a link to the Building Guide
>> can be found on the project source page:
>>
>>   http://openoffice.apache.org/source.html
>>
>> Please let us know how this goes for you.
>>
>>
>>  On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 9:08 AM, Kay Schenk 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>  Regarding Jürgen's comments  on a recent thread --

 http://markmail.org/message/v5zli2np67qv5ryz

 Since  CentOS 5 is our reference distribution for delivered Linux

>>> binaries
>>>
 (I did not know this!) -- and I am assuming this distro might remain as

>>> the
>>>
 reference going forward, does it make sense to try to move forward to
 set
 this up as a buildbot. I know wokr had already started on this. Can

>>> someone
>>>
 give us an update?

 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6217

 I don't know CentOS, but having about 18  years in various *nixes HP/UX,
 Solaris, RedHat, SuSE), I could probably help assuming I could work in
 command line only to deal with this.

 On the MacOSX front, the latest update indicates we don't have hardware

>>> :(
>>>
 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-4902

 Any suggestions? Volunteers with equipment to dedicate to this?



 --


  
>>> -
>>>
 MzK

 “Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot,
   Nothing is going to get better. It's not.”
-- Dr. Seuss, The Lorax


>>
>>
>


-- 
-
MzK

“Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot,
 Nothing is going to get better. It's not.”
  -- Dr. Seuss, The Lorax

Re: [discuss] drop support for Java 5 and Java 6 for Windows

2013-11-15 Thread janI 
On 15 November 2013 18:59, Kay Schenk  wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 11:53 PM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann <
> orwittm...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > On 15.11.2013 08:38, janI wrote:
> >
> >> On 15 November 2013 08:25, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann <
> >> orwittm...@googlemail.com
> >>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>
> >>  Hi,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 15.11.2013 00:54, Kay Schenk wrote:
> >>>
> >>>  On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 11:26 PM, janI  wrote:
> 
>    On 14 November 2013 03:32, Kay Schenk  wrote:
> 
> >
> >   On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 5:11 AM, Andrea Pescetti <
> > pesce...@apache.org
> >
> >>
> >>  wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>   On 12/09/2013 Kay Schenk wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>>   Did we reach a consensus on this one?
> >>>
>  Wait until 4.1 to "officially" change java build environment to 7?
>  Buildbots are still at 6, although I know some of us are using 7
> for
>  building with no problems.
> 
> 
>   We didn't reach consensus, the reason being (rather than
> >>> disagreement)
> >>> that it's unclear:
> >>> - what the proposal is about exactly
> >>> - what's broken in the current setup
> >>> - what's the impact on people who wish to build OpenOffice
> >>> - what's the impact on people who wish to use OpenOffice
> >>>
> >>> Now, after yet another discussion where we explain Java to each
> >>> other,
> >>>
> >>>  we
> >>
> >
> >  can take for granted that we all know about it and move on and see
> >> what
> >>
> >>>
> >>>  the
> >>
> >>  proposal is about in concrete, so that is can be evaluated properly
> >>> and
> >>> maybe implemented in time for 4.1.
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Andrea.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> 
> >>> -
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>   OK, I'm back on this old thread. The thing is the security
> >>>
> >> considerations
> >> do not just apply to Windows.  I suggest we switch to java 7 as
> >> default
> >>
> >>  and
> >
> >  change the settings for "javacompiler" in configure.inappropriately
> >> to
> >> deal with this.
> >>
> >> Although by default, I build with java 7, I will make this change
> >> locally
> >> and see what happens.
> >>
> >>
> >>  +1, so we use java 7 for development, but the final installation
> > still
> > runs
> > with both java 6 and java 7.
> >
> > rgds
> > jan I.
> >
> >
> >  Well, in theory, yes. In practice -- I guess not. :(
> 
>  I changed my configure.in etc and rebuilt. Then a final stop with
> this
>  message --
> 
> javac: source release 1.7 requires target release 1.7
> 
>  in module jvmfwk
> 
> 
>  The man page for javac (openJDK 7)has this info talks about "default"
>  values for targets depending on source...here are the last bits of
> that
> 
>  o If -source is 1.5, the value of -target is 1.7
> 
> o If -source is 1.6, the value of -target is 1.7
> 
> o For all other values of -source, the value of -target is the
> value
>  of
>  -source.
> 
>  but no specific information  saying iyou can NOT specify a target
> value
>  that is below your source value.
> 
>  I imagine this is universal and not just specific to openJDK but I
> don't
>  know for sure.
> 
>  Any other ideas?
> 
> 
>   On my attempt to build on Windows with Java 1.7 (Windows 7 64bit Home
> >>> Premium VM) I did the following:
> >>> After having setup the build environment via configure, bootstrap and
> >>> sourcing the creating 'winenv.set.sh' I set the environment variable
> >>> JAVAFLAGS to "-source 1.5 -target 1.5" by command
> >>> - export JAVAFLAGS='-source 1.5 -target 1.5'
> >>>
> >>> My build was sucessfull and the resulting installation set worked on a
> >>> different Windows machine with Java 1.6
> >>>
> >>>
> >> I have done a similar thing on ubuntu 12.04, manually modified
> >> LinuxX86-64Env.Set.sh and it builds correctly.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> Unfortunately, I did not continued my work on it - e.g.
> >>> - detecting the Java version during configure
> >>> - setting JAVAFLAGS automatically depending on the detected Java
> version
> >>>
> >>>
> >> It seems the right place to do this is configure.in. But why detect
> >> version, why not simple set the flags ?
> >>
> >>
> > Yes, you are right.
> > When it works in the build environment with all the different Java
> > versions this is the simply solution.
> >
> >
> >
> > Best regards, Oliver.
> >
> > -
> > To uns

Reporting a problem with the OpenOffice website

2013-11-15 Thread couvreur laurence 
Bonjour,

Le 23.10.2013 à 19h09 j'ai téléchargé une version normalement gratuite d'open 
office sur votre site internet.
Pour cela il fallait envoyer 2 sms pour obtenir des codes afin de poursuivre le 
téléchargement.
Aujourd'hui ces 2 sms me sont facturés 10euros TTC par mon opérateur!
Aussi la notion de gratuité n'est elle pas l’absence de transaction financière? 
Cordialement,

Laurence Couvreur.

Re: Reporting a problem with the OpenOffice website

2013-11-15 Thread Donald Whytock 
2013/11/15 couvreur laurence 

> Bonjour,
>
> Le 23.10.2013 à 19h09 j'ai téléchargé une version normalement gratuite
> d'open office sur votre site internet.
> Pour cela il fallait envoyer 2 sms pour obtenir des codes afin de
> poursuivre le téléchargement.
> Aujourd'hui ces 2 sms me sont facturés 10euros TTC par mon opérateur!
> Aussi la notion de gratuité n'est elle pas l’absence de transaction
> financière?
> Cordialement,
>
> Laurence Couvreur.


openoffice.org ?

Re: Reporting a problem with the OpenOffice website

2013-11-15 Thread Marcus (OOo) 

Am 11/15/2013 07:29 PM, schrieb couvreur laurence:

Bonjour,

Le 23.10.2013 à 19h09 j'ai téléchargé une version normalement gratuite d'open 
office sur votre site internet.
Pour cela il fallait envoyer 2 sms pour obtenir des codes afin de poursuivre le 
téléchargement.
Aujourd'hui ces 2 sms me sont facturés 10euros TTC par mon opérateur!
Aussi la notion de gratuité n'est elle pas l’absence de transaction financière?
Cordialement,

Laurence Couvreur.


First of all, this is an English-speaking mailing list. I don't know any 
French, so please allow me to answer in English.




You cannot have downloaded OpenOffice from our (www.openoffice.org) 
website as we don't charge any money to download our software.


In general, please download only from the original vendor or at least 
from approved/trusted 3rd party websites.


For Apache OpenOffice please use only the following download webpage. 
This will forward you to a download offering from our partner SourgeForge:


http://www.openoffice.org/download/

HTH

Marcus



FYI - English translation from Google:

On 23.10.2013 at 19h09 I downloaded a free version of normally open 
office on your website.
For this it was necessary to send 2 sms to obtain codes to continue 
downloading.

Today these two sms are charged me 10 euros TTC per my operator!
Also the notion of free Is not the lack of financial transaction?

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: buildbots -- Linux and MacOSX

2013-11-15 Thread Marcus (OOo) 

Really promizing and great news. Thanks for the detailed update.

Marcus



Am 11/15/2013 06:54 PM, schrieb Andrew Rist:

I wanted to give an update on the buildbots, as this is a question that
keeps coming up.

* We've received assurances that the Mac buildbot is coming. Long
story short, the current mac hardware is a bit long in the tooth and
we would kill everything on it if we added our builds to the current
machine. We are waiting for real hardware in the form of a Mac Pro
which will enable us to have multiple virtualized mac bots, giving
us our own environment that can be set up for AOO. The machine
should be ordered by the end of the year - bot should come up early
next year - ish...
* We are also waiting on a CentOS bot to create our standard Linux
build. This has been requested and is in the works, and Jan has
agreed to bring this up in discussions with infra. I am hoping we
can have this for the 4.1 release timeframe.
* FreeBSD bot - we have a new freebsd bot and it is slowly moving
toward building without errors. If anyone has suggestions for
fixing issues on there, please post to dev and we'll move that
forward. We are currently stuck on Hunspell -
http://ci.apache.org/builders/openoffice-fbsd-nightly/builds/91/steps/configure/logs/stdio

and
http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/buildlogs/fbsdn/log/unxfbsdx.pro.build.html

* The hung process issue with the windows buildbots seems to solved
now, and has not been a problem lately.
* Currently the Windows bots are failing - but this seems to an issue
of svn getting out of sync, I'm cleaning up the bot and restarting
the machine after some updates - I expect this to clean up the
current issues. (
* Snapshots - both linux and windoze are currently having issues in
terms of the size of files that the build creates. The standard
buildbot directory upload routine zips the directory, uploads it,
and unzips at the destination. Our directory of install bits has
gotten too large and we are running into an exception on this
step. (On long term fix is to create our own custom directory
upload code for build bot - but that is another discussion...) The
short term solution is to split the snapshot build into two builds
(possible in a single flow) and build half the languages in each
build - this should get us around the space issue.

That's all for now
A.



On 11/13/2013 10:01 AM, Kay Schenk wrote:

On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 6:33 PM, Glenn Harvey Liwanag <
glennharveyliwa...@gmail.com> wrote:


I can try building the thing on my Mac OS X if that's what you're
looking
for. It's my only computer right now and I use it for school so I
have to
know first the average build time and the instructions to get the whole
thing done without academics interfering with the work.


Thanks for this offer! Resources used for building are dependent on your
system, but typically it would take about 2 hours for a full build.

Information on how to obtain the source and a link to the Building Guide
can be found on the project source page:

http://openoffice.apache.org/source.html

Please let us know how this goes for you.



On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 9:08 AM, Kay Schenk 
wrote:


Regarding Jürgen's comments on a recent thread --

http://markmail.org/message/v5zli2np67qv5ryz

Since CentOS 5 is our reference distribution for delivered Linux

binaries

(I did not know this!) -- and I am assuming this distro might remain as

the

reference going forward, does it make sense to try to move forward
to set
this up as a buildbot. I know wokr had already started on this. Can

someone

give us an update?

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6217

I don't know CentOS, but having about 18 years in various *nixes HP/UX,
Solaris, RedHat, SuSE), I could probably help assuming I could work in
command line only to deal with this.

On the MacOSX front, the latest update indicates we don't have hardware

:(

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-4902

Any suggestions? Volunteers with equipment to dedicate to this?


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [Proposal] Update 'Get It Here' Banner

2013-11-15 Thread Andrea Pescetti 

On 15/11/2013 Samer Mansour wrote:

Ok no one voted +1 nor -1 explicitly, but it sounds like people are happy
with the new banner. ... http://dynomie.com/ext/getithere2.png


Sure, it was lazy consensus on my side. Nice job!

Regards,
  Andrea.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [Proposal] Update 'Get It Here' Banner

2013-11-15 Thread Marcus (OOo) 

Am 11/15/2013 08:26 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:

On 15/11/2013 Samer Mansour wrote:

Ok no one voted +1 nor -1 explicitly, but it sounds like people are happy
with the new banner. ... http://dynomie.com/ext/getithere2.png


FYI

Only when we do an offical vote for something then +1 or -1 or 0 is 
important and counted - e.g., for a new AOO release.


Otherwise it's just lazy consensus. Of course many of us write +1 to 
express that they like it. But this has no real meaning. It would also 
work without this as only the written text is taken into account.



Sure, it was lazy consensus on my side. Nice job!


Me too.

Marcus


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: buildbots -- Linux and MacOSX

2013-11-15 Thread Andrea Pescetti 

Andrew Rist wrote:

* We've received assurances that the Mac buildbot is coming. ...
We are waiting for real hardware in the form of a Mac Pro
which will enable us to have multiple virtualized mac bots, giving
us our own environment that can be set up for AOO. The machine
should be ordered by the end of the year - bot should come up early
next year - ish...


Thanks for the update. It's great to know that the Mac buildbot is 
coming, and many thanks should go to Infra for finding the time to deal 
with this. Looking forward to see it available.



* We are also waiting on a CentOS bot to create our standard Linux
build. This has been requested and is in the works, and Jan has
agreed to bring this up in discussions with infra. I am hoping we
can have this for the 4.1 release timeframe.


If I remember the old conversations correctly, here we already had the 
hardware, and a very powerful one, and the next step was to provide a 
CentOS 5 virtual machine. Is that correct? Building a VM is not rocket 
science, and I think several of us would be able to help with this if 
this can help move forward.


Regards,
  Andrea.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Reporting a problem with the OpenOffice website

2013-11-15 Thread Donald Whytock 
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Marcus (OOo)  wrote:

> Am 11/15/2013 07:29 PM, schrieb couvreur laurence:
>
>  Bonjour,
>>
>> Le 23.10.2013 à 19h09 j'ai téléchargé une version normalement gratuite
>> d'open office sur votre site internet.
>> Pour cela il fallait envoyer 2 sms pour obtenir des codes afin de
>> poursuivre le téléchargement.
>> Aujourd'hui ces 2 sms me sont facturés 10euros TTC par mon opérateur!
>> Aussi la notion de gratuité n'est elle pas l’absence de transaction
>> financière?
>> Cordialement,
>>
>> Laurence Couvreur.
>>
>
> First of all, this is an English-speaking mailing list. I don't know any
> French, so please allow me to answer in English.
>
>
>
> You cannot have downloaded OpenOffice from our (www.openoffice.org)
> website as we don't charge any money to download our software.
>
> In general, please download only from the original vendor or at least from
> approved/trusted 3rd party websites.
>
> For Apache OpenOffice please use only the following download webpage. This
> will forward you to a download offering from our partner SourgeForge:
>
> http://www.openoffice.org/download/
>
> HTH
>
> Marcus
>
>
>
> FYI - English translation from Google:
>
> On 23.10.2013 at 19h09 I downloaded a free version of normally open office
> on your website.
> For this it was necessary to send 2 sms to obtain codes to continue
> downloading.
> Today these two sms are charged me 10 euros TTC per my operator!
> Also the notion of free Is not the lack of financial transaction?
>

Assuming the translation worked properly, he's not saying he was charged
money for the download.  He's saying whatever site he was downloading from
required him to send two text messages in order to get a validation code
for the download.  Then whoever he sent the texts to billed his phone.

I'm guessing whatever site he used not only misrepresented AOO, it also
misrepresented "free" and ripped him off.

I find it ironic that there are two ads in my Gmail session as I type this
offering "Free OpenOffice Download".

Don

Re: buildbots -- Linux and MacOSX

2013-11-15 Thread janI 
On 15 November 2013 20:52, Andrea Pescetti  wrote:

> Andrew Rist wrote:
>
>> * We've received assurances that the Mac buildbot is coming. ...
>> We are waiting for real hardware in the form of a Mac Pro
>> which will enable us to have multiple virtualized mac bots, giving
>> us our own environment that can be set up for AOO. The machine
>> should be ordered by the end of the year - bot should come up early
>> next year - ish...
>>
>
> Thanks for the update. It's great to know that the Mac buildbot is coming,
> and many thanks should go to Infra for finding the time to deal with this.
> Looking forward to see it available.
>
>  * We are also waiting on a CentOS bot to create our standard Linux
>> build. This has been requested and is in the works, and Jan has
>> agreed to bring this up in discussions with infra. I am hoping we
>> can have this for the 4.1 release timeframe.
>>
>
> If I remember the old conversations correctly, here we already had the
> hardware, and a very powerful one, and the next step was to provide a
> CentOS 5 virtual machine. Is that correct? Building a VM is not rocket
> science, and I think several of us would be able to help with this if this
> can help move forward.
>

Discussions have been whether or not it should be a vm (that was my
original suggestion) with ubuntu as base or if tethys should run centOS
directly (that was a general AOO suggestion). This discussion drifted out
in nothing, mostly because nobody made a decision and started to work the
issue 6217 is also not really clear in this respect.

It is for sure not rocket science to start a vm. The "science" part comes
when starting to get the standard infra utilities and e.g. ldap to work.
But all in all its just work, that needs to be done.

I have it on the agenda for next weeks infra meeting, and I suspect we
(infra) will decide how to do it and who in infra (you get 2 guesses) will
take the lead.

But of course if anybody else wants to do it, then I am sure that it can be
arranged (just wondering, why it did not happen earlier).

rgds
jan I.

>
> Regards,
>   Andrea.
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>
>

Re: [discuss] drop support for Java 5 and Java 6 for Windows

2013-11-15 Thread Kay Schenk 
On Nov 15, 2013 10:34 AM, "janI"  wrote:
>
> On 15 November 2013 18:59, Kay Schenk  wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 11:53 PM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann <
> > orwittm...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > >
> > > On 15.11.2013 08:38, janI wrote:
> > >
> > >> On 15 November 2013 08:25, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann <
> > >> orwittm...@googlemail.com
> > >>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>  Hi,
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On 15.11.2013 00:54, Kay Schenk wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>  On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 11:26 PM, janI  wrote:
> > 
> >    On 14 November 2013 03:32, Kay Schenk 
wrote:
> > 
> > >
> > >   On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 5:11 AM, Andrea Pescetti <
> > > pesce...@apache.org
> > >
> > >>
> > >>  wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>   On 12/09/2013 Kay Schenk wrote:
> > >>
> > >>>
> > >>>   Did we reach a consensus on this one?
> > >>>
> >  Wait until 4.1 to "officially" change java build environment
to 7?
> >  Buildbots are still at 6, although I know some of us are using
7
> > for
> >  building with no problems.
> > 
> > 
> >   We didn't reach consensus, the reason being (rather than
> > >>> disagreement)
> > >>> that it's unclear:
> > >>> - what the proposal is about exactly
> > >>> - what's broken in the current setup
> > >>> - what's the impact on people who wish to build OpenOffice
> > >>> - what's the impact on people who wish to use OpenOffice
> > >>>
> > >>> Now, after yet another discussion where we explain Java to each
> > >>> other,
> > >>>
> > >>>  we
> > >>
> > >
> > >  can take for granted that we all know about it and move on and
see
> > >> what
> > >>
> > >>>
> > >>>  the
> > >>
> > >>  proposal is about in concrete, so that is can be evaluated
properly
> > >>> and
> > >>> maybe implemented in time for 4.1.
> > >>>
> > >>> Regards,
> > >>> Andrea.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> 
> > >>> -
> > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>   OK, I'm back on this old thread. The thing is the security
> > >>>
> > >> considerations
> > >> do not just apply to Windows.  I suggest we switch to java 7 as
> > >> default
> > >>
> > >>  and
> > >
> > >  change the settings for "javacompiler" in
configure.inappropriately
> > >> to
> > >> deal with this.
> > >>
> > >> Although by default, I build with java 7, I will make this change
> > >> locally
> > >> and see what happens.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>  +1, so we use java 7 for development, but the final installation
> > > still
> > > runs
> > > with both java 6 and java 7.
> > >
> > > rgds
> > > jan I.
> > >
> > >
> > >  Well, in theory, yes. In practice -- I guess not. :(
> > 
> >  I changed my configure.in etc and rebuilt. Then a final stop with
> > this
> >  message --
> > 
> > javac: source release 1.7 requires target release 1.7
> > 
> >  in module jvmfwk
> > 
> > 
> >  The man page for javac (openJDK 7)has this info talks about
"default"
> >  values for targets depending on source...here are the last bits of
> > that
> > 
> >  o If -source is 1.5, the value of -target is 1.7
> > 
> > o If -source is 1.6, the value of -target is 1.7
> > 
> > o For all other values of -source, the value of -target is the
> > value
> >  of
> >  -source.
> > 
> >  but no specific information  saying iyou can NOT specify a target
> > value
> >  that is below your source value.
> > 
> >  I imagine this is universal and not just specific to openJDK but I
> > don't
> >  know for sure.
> > 
> >  Any other ideas?
> > 
> > 
> >   On my attempt to build on Windows with Java 1.7 (Windows 7 64bit
Home
> > >>> Premium VM) I did the following:
> > >>> After having setup the build environment via configure, bootstrap
and
> > >>> sourcing the creating 'winenv.set.sh' I set the environment variable
> > >>> JAVAFLAGS to "-source 1.5 -target 1.5" by command
> > >>> - export JAVAFLAGS='-source 1.5 -target 1.5'
> > >>>
> > >>> My build was sucessfull and the resulting installation set worked
on a
> > >>> different Windows machine with Java 1.6
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >> I have done a similar thing on ubuntu 12.04, manually modified
> > >> LinuxX86-64Env.Set.sh and it builds correctly.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>> Unfortunately, I did not continued my work on it - e.g.
> > >>> - detecting the Java version during configure
> > >>> - setting JAVAFLAGS automatically depending on the detected Java
> > version
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >> It seems the right p

Re: Build braker in rejuvenate01 cppu

2013-11-15 Thread Raphael Bircher 

Hi Herbert

Am 15.11.13 17:17, schrieb Herbert Duerr:

Just a small status update to my mail from Tuesday:

On 12.11.2013 10:17, Herbert Dürr wrote:

On 11.11.2013 10:47, Raphael Bircher wrote:

I run in a build breaker in the rejuvenate01 branche

dmake:  Error: -- `uno_purpenvhelpers5abi.map' not found, and can't be
made


I just committed r1540968 to add the missing file by renaming its older
cousin.


Has someone a idea what happend here, and what's wrong?

[...]
Thanks for looking into the "rejuvenate01" branch. With the renaming and
the recent major update from trunk it has become a "construction site"
though. After the RmMoz work I can now focus on getting the branch round
again and make it a viable port. So stay tuned, in a few days it will
build+run out of the box again and it will have gained an important
feature it missed so far: support for password protected documents!


The rejuvenate01 branch should build out of the box again. Note the 
working support for password protected documents and the latest 
goodies we got by resyncing to trunk.

No, at me it does not working it stops at "testtools" as far I can see.

COPY: ../config/Linguistic-lingucomponent-thesaurus.xcu -> 
/Users/nacnaub/Documents/rejuvenate01/main/solver/410/unxmaccx.pro/xml/registry/data/org/openoffice/Office/Linguistic-lingucomponent-thesaurus.xcu
COPY: ../unxmaccx.pro/misc/MacOSXSpell.component -> 
/Users/nacnaub/Documents/rejuvenate01/main/solver/410/unxmaccx.pro/xml/MacOSXSpell.component
COPY: ../unxmaccx.pro/misc/guesslang.component -> 
/Users/nacnaub/Documents/rejuvenate01/main/solver/410/unxmaccx.pro/xml/guesslang.component
COPY: ../unxmaccx.pro/misc/hyphen.component -> 
/Users/nacnaub/Documents/rejuvenate01/main/solver/410/unxmaccx.pro/xml/hyphen.component
COPY: ../unxmaccx.pro/misc/lnth.component -> 
/Users/nacnaub/Documents/rejuvenate01/main/solver/410/unxmaccx.pro/xml/lnth.component
COPY: ../unxmaccx.pro/misc/spell.component -> 
/Users/nacnaub/Documents/rejuvenate01/main/solver/410/unxmaccx.pro/xml/spell.component
LOG: writing 
/Users/nacnaub/Documents/rejuvenate01/main/solver/410/unxmaccx.pro/inc/lingucomponent/deliver.log
Module 'lingucomponent' delivered successfully. 15 files copied, 10 
files unchanged


3 module(s):
epm
testtools
vcl
need(s) to be rebuilt

Reason(s):

ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making 
/Users/nacnaub/Documents/rejuvenate01/main/testtools/source/bridgetest
ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making 
/Users/nacnaub/Documents/rejuvenate01/main/vcl/prj
ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making 
/Users/nacnaub/Documents/rejuvenate01/main/epm


When you have fixed the errors in that module you can resume the build 
by running:


build --from epm testtools vcl

Greetings Raphael

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [code] build breaker on Linux 64bit in introduced ia2 code

2013-11-15 Thread Steve Yin 
Hi Oliver and Herbert,

Sorry for the break. Thank you all for fixing it so quickly!


On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 7:13 PM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann <
orwittm...@googlemail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> kudos to Herbert.
>
> While I have written the below message Herbert has already provided the
> fix - see revision 1542228
>
> Steve, may be you can have an additional look at the unused parameters.
>
> Best regards, Oliver.
>
>
> On 15.11.2013 12:09, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
>
>> Hi Steve,
>>
>> can you please have look at the build breaker on Linux 64bit, found by
>> our corresponding Linux 64bit build bot.
>>
>> The build breaks in module accessibility.
>> The relevante build output is:
>> 
>> ...
>> Compiling: accessibility/source/standard/vclxaccessiblelist.cxx
>> ...
>> /home/buildslave19/slave19/openofficeorg-nightly/build/
>> main/accessibility/source/standard/vclxaccessiblelist.cxx:
>> In member function 'virtual void
>> VCLXAccessibleList::ProcessWindowEvent(const VclWindowEvent&, bool)':
>> /home/buildslave19/slave19/openofficeorg-nightly/build/
>> main/accessibility/source/standard/vclxaccessiblelist.cxx:372:
>> error: cast from 'void*' to 'sal_uInt32' loses precision
>> /home/buildslave19/slave19/openofficeorg-nightly/build/
>> main/accessibility/source/standard/vclxaccessiblelist.cxx:
>> At global scope:
>> /home/buildslave19/slave19/openofficeorg-nightly/build/
>> main/accessibility/source/standard/vclxaccessiblelist.cxx:606:
>> warning: unused parameter 'bItemInserted'
>> /home/buildslave19/slave19/openofficeorg-nightly/build/
>> main/accessibility/source/standard/vclxaccessiblelist.cxx:606:
>> warning: unused parameter 'nIndex'
>> dmake:  Error code 1, while making
>> '../../unxlngx6.pro/slo/vclxaccessiblelist.obj'
>> 
>>
>> Until the next Linux 64bit build bot is started, the complete build
>> output can be found at [1].
>>
>> [1]
>> http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/buildlogs/linux64/
>> main/accessibility/unxlngx6.pro/misc/logs/source.standard.txt
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks in advance.
>>
>> Best regards, Oliver.
>>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>
>


-- 
Best Regards,

Steve Yin