Out of interest do the speakers see the specific comments individual
reviewers post or are these aggregated/anonymised in some way?
Rob
On 30/01/2014 04:40, "Rich Bowen" wrote:
>The system gives us accept/reject rankings. If you want to communicate
>more
>than that, email me. Or call me. I want to have talk selections reflect
>the
>opinion of the subject experts.
>
>--
>Rich Bowen - rbo...@rcbowen.com
>
>
>On Jan 29, 2014 5:29 PM, "Roman Shaposhnik" wrote:
>
>> Since this is my first time helping with the reviews,
>> I'm also wondering what's the objective for us
>> reviewers? Are we expected to stack-rank
>> the proposal in our given areas or weight them
>> somehow?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Roman.
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 9:53 AM, Kay Schenk
>>wrote:
>> > As I am quite new to this process, a few questions --
>> >
>> > The closing date for submissions is Feb 1, and it seems notifications
>> will
>> > be sent out by Feb 14. So, what is the due date for completion of
>> reviews?
>> >
>> > There are a few submissions -- aside from some standard ASF
>>presentations
>> > -- that are somewhat generic and don't directly apply to a specific
>> Apache
>> > project. So -- who will be reviewing these? Or should anybody that
>> > volunteered for reviewing, review them?
>> >
>> > Can more than one reviewer rate a submission and perhaps change the
>> > decision of a previous reviewer? Just curious about this. But it
>>might be
>> > advantageous in some situations to get input from multiple reviewers.
>> >
>> > ok, that's it for now...
>> >
>> > --
>> >
>>
>--
>--
>-
>> > Kay Schenk, Apache OpenOffice
>> >
>> > "Cats do not have to be shown how to have a good time,
>> > for they are unfailing ingenious in that respect."
>> >-- James Mason
>>
>
