Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-2132 : The reload button doesn't work with Security Groups and Statistic tab in instance detail view
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10751/#review20158 --- Ship it! The problem was that the API call was not invoked (since UI did not trigger it)when clicking the Refresh button . The patch looks good and works . I'll merge it with master . Thanks Isaac for the patch .Good catch ! - Pranav Saxena On April 24, 2013, 7:31 a.m., Isaac Chiang wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/10751/ > --- > > (Updated April 24, 2013, 7:31 a.m.) > > > Review request for cloudstack and Pranav Saxena. > > > Description > --- > > The reload button for security group tab and statistic tab doesn't actually > send a request to the back-end but use the data when the user clicking into > the instances detail view. > The patch fix the issue that request to the server and replace the associated > tab with lately returned data. > > > This addresses bug CLOUSTACK-2132. > > > Diffs > - > > ui/scripts/instances.js 3a43c60 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10751/diff/ > > > Testing > --- > > Test from UI and work as expect. > > > Thanks, > > Isaac Chiang > >
Re: Review Request: fix bug CLOUDSTACK-2160: add a huge size guest network will cause out of memory
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10750/#review20159 --- Commit 63f3ccd4dfc835581305bb57c0878861106dcfe6 in branch refs/heads/master from Pranav Saxena [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=63f3ccd ] CLOUDSTACK-2160:Refresh button functionality for security groups and statistics tab - ASF Subversion and Git Services On April 24, 2013, 4:20 a.m., Hongtu Zang wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/10750/ > --- > > (Updated April 24, 2013, 4:20 a.m.) > > > Review request for cloudstack, Likitha Shetty, Prasanna Santhanam, and mice > xia. > > > Description > --- > > fix bug CLOUDSTACK-2160: add a huge size guest network will cause out of > memory > > modify NetUtils.java getAllIpsFromCidr, it will returns no more than 255 > unused ips. > > > This addresses bug CLOUDSTACK-2160. > > > Diffs > - > > server/src/com/cloud/network/NetworkModelImpl.java c5930d9 > server/src/com/cloud/network/NetworkServiceImpl.java ac2ac45 > utils/src/com/cloud/utils/net/NetUtils.java 5988dd5 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10750/diff/ > > > Testing > --- > > create a new network with netmask 255.0.0.0 and it won't cause out of memory > > > Thanks, > > Hongtu Zang > >
Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-2132 : The reload button doesn't work with Security Groups and Statistic tab in instance detail view
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10751/#review20160 --- Patch has been merged with master - Commit: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack/commit/63f3ccd4 . Please mark the review request as Submitted . - Pranav Saxena On April 24, 2013, 7:31 a.m., Isaac Chiang wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/10751/ > --- > > (Updated April 24, 2013, 7:31 a.m.) > > > Review request for cloudstack and Pranav Saxena. > > > Description > --- > > The reload button for security group tab and statistic tab doesn't actually > send a request to the back-end but use the data when the user clicking into > the instances detail view. > The patch fix the issue that request to the server and replace the associated > tab with lately returned data. > > > This addresses bug CLOUSTACK-2132. > > > Diffs > - > > ui/scripts/instances.js 3a43c60 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10751/diff/ > > > Testing > --- > > Test from UI and work as expect. > > > Thanks, > > Isaac Chiang > >
Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-1871 : domainId parameter to uploadVolume not working
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10479/#review20161 --- The logic looks good to me . But I'll still request someone in the community who is more thorough with the backend code to review it once. If possible , Could you add Nitin Mehta or Devdeep Singh in the list of reviewers as well ? Thanks ! - Pranav Saxena On April 15, 2013, 4:17 p.m., Isaac Chiang wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/10479/ > --- > > (Updated April 15, 2013, 4:17 p.m.) > > > Review request for cloudstack and Pranav Saxena. > > > Description > --- > > CLOUDSTACK-1871 : domainId parameter to uploadVolume not working > > 1. Remove duplicated lines for setting domainId. > 2. Set domainId with owner's domain if the owner is specified ( with account > and domainid passed in) > > > This addresses bug CLOUDSTACK-1871. > > > Diffs > - > > server/src/com/cloud/storage/VolumeManagerImpl.java 1e8edaf > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10479/diff/ > > > Testing > --- > > Test from UI and curl request, both work well > > > Thanks, > > Isaac Chiang > >
Re: Release Verification Tool - if you're interested
Wow. This is a great idea! On CouchDB we have couchdb-admin.git and we keep stuff like this in that repos. Might we want to consider something similar? (We also use it to keep email templates in, etc.) https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=couchdb-admin.git On 23 April 2013 14:36, Chip Childers wrote: > Hi all, > > Going through the process of validating the RC's (and several validation > rounds before announcing an RC), I got tired of manually following the > steps in our release testing process [1]. > > Some of the steps do require that you manually work with the release, > however many of the up-front steps are easily scripted. I put together > a generic framework for defining and running a set of release > verification instructions yesterday, including the definition of the > CloudStack release verification steps as the example configuration [2]. > > Feel free to use it if you think it would help you (especially the RM's > that may have to re-spin an RC over and over to ensure that it's right). > > -chip > > [1] > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+procedure > > [2] https://github.com/chipchilders/cloudstack-release-verification-tool > -- NS
Re: [ACS42] Unassigned fearures and improvements
Animesh, GSoC label is for Google Summer of Code. It is not a feature for 4.2. We can safely keep those as tickets but unassigned to a release. -sebastien On May 3, 2013, at 7:28 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > > The following features and improvements are set to 4.2.0 for their fix > version but are currently unassigned and open. If someone wants to take them > up, now's the time to assign them to yourself . I will move unclaimed item > to future on 5/7 > > Key Summary Reporter > CLOUDSTACK-67 ResizingXxYton > CLOUDSTACK-1147 cloud-setup-* should be removed Wido den Hollander > CLOUDSTACK-1781 GSoC: Create a cloud in a box using DevCloud > sebastien goasguen > CLOUDSTACK-1782 GSoC: Improve CloudStack support in apache whirr and > incubator-provisioner to created hadoop clusters sebastien goasguen > CLOUDSTACK-1942 allow choosing IP when calling associateIpAddress > Marcus Sorensen > CLOUDSTACK-1952 Provide a DSL framework for cloudstack Marvin > Prasanna Santhanam > CLOUDSTACK-129introduce listIsolationMethods API Murali Reddy > CLOUDSTACK-212Switch java package structure from com.cloud to > org.apache Chip Childers > CLOUDSTACK-1097 Increase the max length of resource tag value Mice Xia > CLOUDSTACK-1525 Add section on how to ssh in to system VMs Jessica > Tomechak > CLOUDSTACK-1580 Make the color for Notifications configurable Mike > Tutkowski > > > Thanks! > > Animesh
New Committer: Isaac Chiang
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Isaac Chiang to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that they have accepted. Among several things, Isaac has translated the entire documentation in zh-TW almost alone. Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute more autonomously. For developers, it makes it easier to submit changes and eliminates the need to have contributions reviewed via the patch submission process. Whether contributions are development-related or otherwise, it is a recognition of a contributor's participation in the project and commitment to the project and the Apache Way. Please join me in congratulating Isaac, --Sebastien on behalf of the CloudStack PMC
Re: New Committer: Isaac Chiang
Congratulations! On 4 May 2013 13:54, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked > Isaac Chiang to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that > they have accepted. > > Among several things, Isaac has translated the entire documentation in > zh-TW almost alone. > > Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute more > autonomously. For developers, it makes it easier to submit changes and > eliminates the need to have contributions reviewed via the patch > submission process. Whether contributions are development-related or > otherwise, it is a recognition of a contributor's participation in the > project and commitment to the project and the Apache Way. > > Please join me in congratulating Isaac, > > --Sebastien > on behalf of the CloudStack PMC -- NS
Re: [GSOC] LDAP User provisioning: Design document feedback
Ian thanks a lot for your proposal and submission.
This project has been proposed by Abhinandan Prateek, so I am copying him in
this email so he can comment.
@Abhi, you need to access the google melange site and find Ian's proposal
-Sebastien
On May 3, 2013, at 12:40 PM, Ian Duffy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry just noticed that the attachment appeared to have got stripped, here
> is the contents of the PDF. Alternatively I have uploaded it here:
> http://ianduffy.ie/Cloudstack-LDAP.pdf
>
> *Apache Cloudstack Google Summer of Code Project: LDAP user provisioning*
>
>
> Need to automate the way the LDAP users are provisioned into cloud stack.
> This will mean better integration with a LDAP server, ability to import
> users and a way to define how the LDAP user maps to the cloudstack users.
>
>
> Abstract
>
>
>
> The aim of this project is to provide an easier mechanism to provision
> users from LDAP into cloudstack. Currently cloudstack provides
> authentication LDAP authentication. In this authentication users must be
> first setup in cloudstack. Once the user is setup in cloudstack they can
> authenticate using their ldap username and password.
>
>
>
> This feature aims to extend the current functionality to make user setup
> align with LDAP group.
>
>
> Deliverables
>
> ñ Service that retrieves a list of ldap users from the configured group
>
> ñ Extension of cloudstack UI “Add User” screen to offer user list from
> LDAP
>
> ñ Add service for saving new user with details from LDAP
>
> ñ BDD unit and acceptance automated testing
>
> ñ Document change details
>
>
> Quantifiable results
>
>
> Given A need to add new user to cloudstack and LDAP is setup
>
> When
>
> You open the “Add User” screen
>
> Then
>
> A table of users appears for the current list of users (not already created
> on cloudstack) from the LDAP group displaying their a checkbox, username,
> name and email address. The timezone dropdown will still be available
> beside each user.
> Given A need to add new user to cloudstack and LDAP is not setup
>
> When
>
> You open the “Add User” screen
>
> Then
>
> The current add user screen and functionality is provided
> Given A need to add new user to cloudstack and LDAP is setup
>
> When
>
> You open the “Add User” screen and mandatory information is missing
>
> Then
>
> These fields will be editable to enable you populate the name or email
> address
>
>
> Given A need to add new user to cloudstack, LDAP is setup but user is in
> the ldap query group
>
> When
>
> You open the “Add User” screen
>
> Then
>
> There is a list of LDAP users displayed but your current user is present in
> the list
> Given A need to add new user to cloudstack, LDAP is setup but user is
> not in the query group
>
> When
>
> You open the “Add User” screen
>
> Then
>
> There is a list of LDAP users displayed but your current user is not in the
> list
> Given You need to add group of new users to cloudstack
>
> When
>
> You open the “Add User” screen, select the users and hit save
>
> Then
>
> The list of new users are saved to the database
>
>
> Given You need to add group of new users to cloudstack
>
> When
>
> You open the “Add User” screen, select the users and hit save
>
> Then
>
> The list of new users are saved to the database
>
>
> Given You have created a new LDAP user on cloudstack
>
> When
>
> The user authenticates against cloudstack with the right credentials
>
> Then
>
> They are authorised in cloudstack
> Given A user wants to edit an LDAP user
>
> When
>
> They open the Edit User screen
>
> Then
>
> The password fields are disabled and cannot be changed
>The design document *Ldap User List Service*
>
>
>
> *name*: ldapUserList
>
> *responseObject*: LDAPUserResponse {username, email, name}
>
> *parameter*: listType:enum {NEW, EXISTING, ALL} (Default to ALL if no
> option provided)
>
>
>
> Create a new API service call for retreiving the list of users from LDAP.
> This will call a new ConfigurationService which will retrieve the list of
> users using the configured search base and the query filter. The list may
> be filtered in the ConfigurationService based on listType parameter.
>
>
>
> *Ldap Available Service*
>
>
>
> *name*: ldapAvailable
>
> *responseObject*: LDAPAvailableResponse {available:boolean}
>
>
>
> Create a new API service call verifying LDAP is setup correctly verifying
> the following configuration elements are all set:
>
> ñ ldap.hostname
>
> ñ ldap.port
>
> ñ ldap.usessl
>
> ñ ldap.queryfilter
>
> ñ ldap.searchbase
>
> ñ ldap.dn
>
> ñ ldap.password
>
>
>
> The verification that all of these are set will return an available boolean
> true. If required this could perform a status check against LDAP first and
> provide warning if it fails.
>
>
> *Ldap Save Users Service*
>
>
>
> *name*: ldapSaveUsers
>
> *responseObject*: LDAPSaveUsersResponse
Re: [GSoC][Proposal] Integration project to deploy and use Mesos on a CloudStack based cloud
Dharmesh, I see your proposal in the google system, we will get back to you as soon as I know the next steps in the review process. -sebastien On May 1, 2013, at 7:27 AM, Dharmesh Kakadia wrote: > Sebastien and Chiradeep, thanks for the comments !! That clarified a lot of > things. I just read Chiradeep's blog ( > http://cloudierthanthou.wordpress.com/2013/04/26/stackmate-execute-cloudformation-templates-on-cloudstack/) > which details the service. > > I am proposing a server side implementation of cloudformation. > > I misunderstood the ReST and Query API. Thanks for correcting. Information > here(http://gehrcke.de/2009/06/aws-about-api/) helped me. In case we want > to use existing AWS tools for cloudformation, we also would be designing > Query API, not ReST. > > Sorry for the confusion regarding cloudmonkey. I was proposing to integrate > cloudformation API into cloudstack source code, directly and add > corresponding support in cloudmonkey. But as you suggested, it might be > easy to start with prototype decoupled from cloudstack (Uses cloudstack API > and does not reside in cloudstack). I assume by existing cloudformation > tools you mean AWS tools( > http://aws.amazon.com/developertools/AWS-CloudFormation). Reusing them will > be a really good idea. > > There are lot of options for configuration mgmt tools. I have used knife > previously and good to know that it has cloudstack plugin based on fog ( > https://github.com/fifthecho/knife-cloudstack-fog). Reasons rundeck looked > better was support for rollbacking and is full workflow execution engine. > Finally rundeck can use chef/puppet. I have seen provisonr/whirr and they > look promising. Definitely a lot to explore here !! > > Thanks for suggesting clear proposal. > > Thanks, > Dharmesh > > > > > > On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 3:07 PM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > >> >> On Apr 30, 2013, at 4:59 PM, Chiradeep Vittal >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On 4/30/13 5:01 AM, "Sebastien Goasguen" wrote: >>> Dharmesh, see in-line On Apr 30, 2013, at 5:34 AM, Dharmesh Kakadia >> wrote: > Hi, > > I am Dharmesh Kakdia and interested in project "Integration project to > deploy and use Mesos on a CloudStack based cloud" ( > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1784) > > I am working on proposal and want to get feedback. Please provide > suggestions :) > > * > > Abstract: > > The project aims to bring cloudformation[1] like service to cloudstack. > One > of the prime use-case is cluster computing frameworks on cloudstack. A > cloudformation service will give users and administrators of cloudstack > ability to manage and control a set of resources easily. The > cloudformation > will allow booting and configuring a set of VMs and form a cluster. > Simple > example would be LAMP stack. More complex clusters such as mesos or > hadoop > cluster requires a little more advanced configuration. There is already > some work done by Chiradeep Vittal at this front [5] using route and it's using ruote: http://ruote.rubyforge.org > sinatra. In this project, I will implement cloudformation service and > demonstrate how to run mesos cluster using it. You will create cloud formation templates that describe a mesos cluster > > Mesos: > > Mesos is a resource management platform for clusters [2]. It aims to > increase resource utilization of clusters by sharing cluster resources > among multiple processing frameworks(like MapReduce, MPI, Graph > Processing) > or multiple instances of same framework. It provides efficient resource > isolation through use of containers. Uses zookeeper for state > maintenance > and fault tolerance. > > What can run on mesos ? > > Spark: A cluster computing framework based on the Resilient Distributed > Datasets (RDDs) abstraction. RDD is more generalized than MapReduce and > can > support iterative and interactive computation while retaining fault > tolerance, scalability, data locality etc. > > Hadoop: Hadoop is fault tolerant and scalable distributed computing > framework based on MapReduce abstraction. > > Begel: A graph processing framework based on pregel. > > and other frameworks like MPI, Hypertable. > > How to deploy mesos > > Mesos provides cluster installation scripts [7] for cluster deployment. > There are also scripts available to deploy a cluster on Amazon EC2 [8]. It would be nice to see if these scripts can be used as is with the CloudStack EC2 service. > > Deliverables: > > 1. Cloudformation service implementation on cloudstack. > > 2. Integration of cloudformation with cloudmonkey, CLI tool. 2. is a little confusing. I believe that what Chiradeep prototyp
Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-1871 : domainId parameter to uploadVolume not working
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10479/ --- (Updated May 4, 2013, 1:37 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep Singh and Pranav Saxena. Changes --- Add reviewer Devdeep Description --- CLOUDSTACK-1871 : domainId parameter to uploadVolume not working 1. Remove duplicated lines for setting domainId. 2. Set domainId with owner's domain if the owner is specified ( with account and domainid passed in) This addresses bug CLOUDSTACK-1871. Diffs - server/src/com/cloud/storage/VolumeManagerImpl.java 1e8edaf Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10479/diff/ Testing --- Test from UI and curl request, both work well Thanks, Isaac Chiang
Re: [DISCUSS] Authorship of translations
(Copied from elsewhere...) I've been involved in similar discussions about what to do with pull requests on GitHub, etc. I think the general consensus was that as long as there is a reasonable indication that the work was being contributed to the project, then we are okay to include it. i.e. If somebody submits a PR to the CloudStack mirror, then we can include that if we want to, without doing any other checks. But if we spot a PR on a Citrix GitHub repository, that we could apply to CloudStack, we need to contact the original author, to make sure we have permission. The key being that we must establish reasonable intent. And I think we have that in the scenario you describe. In fact, we used to have a checkbox in JIRA that you used to have to tick to indicate when you were uploading that indicated were giving permission for the project to include your work. We removed that checkbox a while ago. I believe we took that action, because there was consensus that attaching a patch established intent. As for authorship. From a legal/policy perspective, author information should be kept out of source files. There are various reasons for this. But the gist is that it can give the impression that individual people "own" the various bits of code. And obviously, this can discourage participation. This is why all Apache source files state copyright as "The Apache Software Foundation", meaning "the lot of us", i.e. shared. Now, I can appreciate that PO files might be a bit different. I took a look at a few of them, and I don't see a problem from a policy perspective, especially if these is standard meta-data, or helps the translation effort. Now understanding how translations take place, I would ask: might having the last translator name in there discourage other translators from participating? As you mention, these files are machine generated, so my guess is: no. So, I think all that remains is a stylistic question. How do we want to attribute the hard work and dedication of our translation team? I know that with code, this is often done with an Author tag in Git, or in the comment, or what have you. But there are other options. What about a THANKSfile? On Apache CouchDB, our THANKS file is actually maintained in two ways. For anything that does not come in with an Author tag in Git, we put it in the file manually. For anything in Git, we actually automate that. See: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=couchdb.git;a=blob_plain;f=bootstrap;hb=HEAD Grep for "THANKS" to see the code that updates the file. This is done when we are preparing a release artefact. Which might not work for us on CloudStack, as, presently, our release artefacts are pristine copies of our Git repository. But we might consider making a script that updates THANKS, and then checking in the changes. On 27 April 2013 01:00, David Nalley wrote: > Why don't we ask them their preference (keeping dev@ in the loop as well) > > --David > > On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Sebastien Goasguen > wrote: > > > > On Apr 26, 2013, at 11:22 AM, David Nalley wrote: > > > As such - I do not see a material difference in how the projects that > are already using translate.a.o and how we function. > > >>> > >>> Do we bring it up to legal-discuss ? I am happy to do so. > >>> > >> > >> What question would we ask? > >> I see two possible questions, let me know if that isn't the case. > >> > >> If the question is 'Is accepting contributions from a plethora of > >> contributors to a project specific instance an acceptable way of doing > >> business' I think the answer is obvious that translate.a.o does > >> exactly that mechanism and there seem to be no issues from a process > >> standpoint. > >> > >> If the question is 'Can the Transifex Apache CloudStack l10n projects > >> serve as an official contribution point' - I personally am comfortable > >> saying that the message is currently clear that we treat them as > >> official. I also don't see a problem with doing so. Is this a point of > >> contention with anyone else? Is there a problem there that I am not > >> seeing? > >> > >> Is there another question? > > > > I am fine with your statements and have no questions for legal-discuss. > > > > I was merely bringing it up in the open to make sure people knew about > it. > > > > The only issue left IMHO is how we ack the authors of translations in > git ? > > > > -sebastien > > > -- NS
Re: New Committer: Isaac Chiang
Congrats Isaac! On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 10:02 PM, Noah Slater wrote: > Congratulations! > > > On 4 May 2013 13:54, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > > > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked > > Isaac Chiang to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that > > they have accepted. > > > > Among several things, Isaac has translated the entire documentation in > > zh-TW almost alone. > > > > Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute more > > autonomously. For developers, it makes it easier to submit changes and > > eliminates the need to have contributions reviewed via the patch > > submission process. Whether contributions are development-related or > > otherwise, it is a recognition of a contributor's participation in the > > project and commitment to the project and the Apache Way. > > > > Please join me in congratulating Isaac, > > > > --Sebastien > > on behalf of the CloudStack PMC > > > > > -- > NS > -- 千葉 豪 Go Chiba E-mail:go.ch...@gmail.com
Re: New Committer: Isaac Chiang
Congrats, Issac. On May 4, 2013, at 12:43 PM, Go Chiba wrote: > Congrats Isaac! > > > On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 10:02 PM, Noah Slater wrote: > >> Congratulations! >> >> >> On 4 May 2013 13:54, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: >> >>> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked >>> Isaac Chiang to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that >>> they have accepted. >>> >>> Among several things, Isaac has translated the entire documentation in >>> zh-TW almost alone. >>> >>> Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute more >>> autonomously. For developers, it makes it easier to submit changes and >>> eliminates the need to have contributions reviewed via the patch >>> submission process. Whether contributions are development-related or >>> otherwise, it is a recognition of a contributor's participation in the >>> project and commitment to the project and the Apache Way. >>> >>> Please join me in congratulating Isaac, >>> >>> --Sebastien >>> on behalf of the CloudStack PMC >> >> >> >> >> -- >> NS >> > > > > -- > 千葉 豪 Go Chiba > E-mail:go.ch...@gmail.com
RE: New Committer: Isaac Chiang
Congrats Isaac ! Now you can commit your code patches yourself :) Looking forward to work with you and Welcome aboard ! Thanks, Pranav -Original Message- From: John Burwell [mailto:jburw...@basho.com] Sent: Saturday, May 04, 2013 10:25 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: New Committer: Isaac Chiang Congrats, Issac. On May 4, 2013, at 12:43 PM, Go Chiba wrote: > Congrats Isaac! > > > On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 10:02 PM, Noah Slater wrote: > >> Congratulations! >> >> >> On 4 May 2013 13:54, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: >> >>> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has >>> asked Isaac Chiang to become a committer and we are pleased to >>> announce that they have accepted. >>> >>> Among several things, Isaac has translated the entire documentation >>> in zh-TW almost alone. >>> >>> Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute more >>> autonomously. For developers, it makes it easier to submit changes >>> and eliminates the need to have contributions reviewed via the patch >>> submission process. Whether contributions are development-related or >>> otherwise, it is a recognition of a contributor's participation in >>> the project and commitment to the project and the Apache Way. >>> >>> Please join me in congratulating Isaac, >>> >>> --Sebastien >>> on behalf of the CloudStack PMC >> >> >> >> >> -- >> NS >> > > > > -- > 千葉 豪 Go Chiba > E-mail:go.ch...@gmail.com
Re: [ACS42] Unassigned fearures and improvements
Ok I will exclude those Thanks Animesh On May 4, 2013, at 5:51 AM, "Sebastien Goasguen" wrote: > Animesh, > > GSoC label is for Google Summer of Code. It is not a feature for 4.2. We can > safely keep those as tickets but unassigned to a release. > > -sebastien > > On May 3, 2013, at 7:28 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi > wrote: > >> >> The following features and improvements are set to 4.2.0 for their fix >> version but are currently unassigned and open. If someone wants to take >> them up, now's the time to assign them to yourself . I will move unclaimed >> item to future on 5/7 >> >> KeySummaryReporter >> CLOUDSTACK-67ResizingXxYton >> CLOUDSTACK-1147cloud-setup-* should be removedWido den Hollander >> CLOUDSTACK-1781GSoC: Create a cloud in a box using DevCloudsebastien >> goasguen >> CLOUDSTACK-1782GSoC: Improve CloudStack support in apache whirr and >> incubator-provisioner to created hadoop clusterssebastien goasguen >> CLOUDSTACK-1942allow choosing IP when calling associateIpAddress >> Marcus Sorensen >> CLOUDSTACK-1952Provide a DSL framework for cloudstack MarvinPrasanna >> Santhanam >> CLOUDSTACK-129introduce listIsolationMethods APIMurali Reddy >> CLOUDSTACK-212Switch java package structure from com.cloud to org.apache >>Chip Childers >> CLOUDSTACK-1097Increase the max length of resource tag valueMice Xia >> CLOUDSTACK-1525Add section on how to ssh in to system VMsJessica >> Tomechak >> CLOUDSTACK-1580Make the color for Notifications configurableMike >> Tutkowski >> >> >> Thanks! >> >> Animesh >
RE: New Committer: Isaac Chiang
Congratulations Isaac > -Original Message- > From: Sebastien Goasguen [mailto:run...@gmail.com] > Sent: Saturday, May 04, 2013 5:54 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: New Committer: Isaac Chiang > > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has > asked Isaac Chiang to become a committer and we are pleased to announce > that they have accepted. > > Among several things, Isaac has translated the entire documentation in zh- > TW almost alone. > > Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute more > autonomously. For developers, it makes it easier to submit changes and > eliminates the need to have contributions reviewed via the patch submission > process. Whether contributions are development-related or otherwise, it is a > recognition of a contributor's participation in the project and commitment to > the project and the Apache Way. > > Please join me in congratulating Isaac, > > --Sebastien > on behalf of the CloudStack PMC
Re: [ACS42] Unassigned fearures and improvements
A patch was submitted for 1942, but it sat awhile and I've requested it be adjusted to apply cleanly. On May 3, 2013 5:29 PM, "Animesh Chaturvedi" wrote: > > The following features and improvements are set to 4.2.0 for their fix > version but are currently unassigned and open. If someone wants to take > them up, now's the time to assign them to yourself . I will move unclaimed > item to future on 5/7 > > Key Summary Reporter > CLOUDSTACK-67 ResizingXxYton > CLOUDSTACK-1147 cloud-setup-* should be removed Wido den Hollander > CLOUDSTACK-1781 GSoC: Create a cloud in a box using DevCloudsebastien > goasguen > CLOUDSTACK-1782 GSoC: Improve CloudStack support in apache whirr and > incubator-provisioner to created hadoop clusters sebastien goasguen > CLOUDSTACK-1942 allow choosing IP when calling associateIpAddress > Marcus Sorensen > CLOUDSTACK-1952 Provide a DSL framework for cloudstack Marvin Prasanna > Santhanam > CLOUDSTACK-129 introduce listIsolationMethods API Murali Reddy > CLOUDSTACK-212 Switch java package structure from com.cloud to org.apache > Chip Childers > CLOUDSTACK-1097 Increase the max length of resource tag value Mice Xia > CLOUDSTACK-1525 Add section on how to ssh in to system VMs Jessica > Tomechak > CLOUDSTACK-1580 Make the color for Notifications configurable Mike > Tutkowski > > > Thanks! > > Animesh >
Re: version of cloudmonkey
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Justin Grudzien wrote: > When I become reliable I am certainly willing to learn how to do it. > While one can disagree with me, I feel everyone who is part of the community should be reliable until proven guilty or whatnot. Justin, register for an account on pypi and share with me your user id. On pypi try to upload a fake package just to understand how pypi works. As agreed in earlier threads, we will never publish a versioned pkg without community vote (there won't be any separate thing, when our release will ask to vote on a release, that includes all the components of that release i.e. cloudmonkey, awsapi, api, utils etc.). Though we will publish snapshots (or latest src dists) with cloudmonkey--snapshot, so when one does: pip install cloudmonkey => gets latest. (the community version) pip install cloudmonkey==4.1 => gets cloudmonkey 4.1 (the release version) Though the actual/official source dist. will be published on apache's infra (pypi is a channel outside of ASF but quite popular and works with pip/easy_install). Cheers. > > Justin > > Sent from my iPhone > > On May 2, 2013, at 5:50 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > > > > On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 4:30 AM, Justin Grudzien wrote: > >> It is currently in master but I will see if I can get Rohit, who I think >> owns the process, to create a new version for pip. If that isn't >> immediately possible I can revert the documentation until it is done. I >> figured documentation is always last :) >> > > Hey, I don't own the process just help publish snapshots. Chip has access > to the pypi release channel as well, and any > committer/pmc/reliable-contributor can gain the access. > Will take a look at it and try to publish latest snapshot from master this > weekend (but no promises :) > > Cheers. > > >> >> Justin >> >> On May 1, 2013, at 4:06 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: >> >> > The wiki was the one that had the 'display' parameter shown. I'm >> assuming >> > the display parameter is only in master then? >> > >> > >> > On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Justin Grudzien >> wrote: >> > >> >> Which documentation are you referring to? I updated cloudmonkey to add >> the >> >> set display and I updated the wiki to include the changes. I also >> noticed >> >> the async issue but haven't gotten around to fixing it yet. >> >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 8:47 AM, Marcus Sorensen >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >>> I noticed that the documentation doesn't quite match up with >> cloudmonkey >> >> as >> >>> installed via tools/cli, nor does it match the tarball. It seems to be >> >>> missing 'set display', among other things, and the asyncblock never >> >>> returns, in either version, long after the job is finished. >> >> >> > >
Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-2274 : The detail view doesn't recover from loading status when trying to delete a zone with physical network on it
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10860/#review20164
---
Hey Isaac , we don't hard-code the error code for call backs . The better way
would be to catch the exception using thrown by the API which would make the
detail view recover from loading status. Something like this -
error:function(json){
args.response.error(parseXMLHttpResponse(json));
}
This would work fine as well ! If you want , I can directly make the relevant
changes in the code myself. Thanks for your patch !
- Pranav Saxena
On April 30, 2013, 7:43 a.m., Isaac Chiang wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/10860/
> ---
>
> (Updated April 30, 2013, 7:43 a.m.)
>
>
> Review request for cloudstack and Pranav Saxena.
>
>
> Description
> ---
>
> According to CS' fronend logic, there is a general error handling function in
> cloudStack.js line 95. Hense this is a common issue for detail view when a
> request failed from server.
> This patch try not to against current UI logic and provide a statusCode
> callback to capture failed request. The added callback will remove loading
> div from detailView.
> This patch is a suggested solution to the issue.
>
> Thanks
>
>
> This addresses bug CLOUDSTACK-2274.
>
>
> Diffs
> -
>
> ui/scripts/system.js 7aa0566
>
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10860/diff/
>
>
> Testing
> ---
>
> Test from UI and work well
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Isaac Chiang
>
>
Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-2274 : The detail view doesn't recover from loading status when trying to delete a zone with physical network on it
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10860/#review20165 --- Commit 5811ae7e2571380ab2b2be4e64686ff3affb7364 in branch refs/heads/master from Pranav Saxena [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=5811ae7 ] CLOUDSTACK-2274:Detail view loading problem when deleting a zone - ASF Subversion and Git Services On April 30, 2013, 7:43 a.m., Isaac Chiang wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/10860/ > --- > > (Updated April 30, 2013, 7:43 a.m.) > > > Review request for cloudstack and Pranav Saxena. > > > Description > --- > > According to CS' fronend logic, there is a general error handling function in > cloudStack.js line 95. Hense this is a common issue for detail view when a > request failed from server. > This patch try not to against current UI logic and provide a statusCode > callback to capture failed request. The added callback will remove loading > div from detailView. > This patch is a suggested solution to the issue. > > Thanks > > > This addresses bug CLOUDSTACK-2274. > > > Diffs > - > > ui/scripts/system.js 7aa0566 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10860/diff/ > > > Testing > --- > > Test from UI and work well > > > Thanks, > > Isaac Chiang > >
Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-2274 : The detail view doesn't recover from loading status when trying to delete a zone with physical network on it
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10860/#review20166 --- I have committed my changes to master , so you could probably discard this review request . Again , thanks for catching this loophole here . - Pranav Saxena On April 30, 2013, 7:43 a.m., Isaac Chiang wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/10860/ > --- > > (Updated April 30, 2013, 7:43 a.m.) > > > Review request for cloudstack and Pranav Saxena. > > > Description > --- > > According to CS' fronend logic, there is a general error handling function in > cloudStack.js line 95. Hense this is a common issue for detail view when a > request failed from server. > This patch try not to against current UI logic and provide a statusCode > callback to capture failed request. The added callback will remove loading > div from detailView. > This patch is a suggested solution to the issue. > > Thanks > > > This addresses bug CLOUDSTACK-2274. > > > Diffs > - > > ui/scripts/system.js 7aa0566 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10860/diff/ > > > Testing > --- > > Test from UI and work well > > > Thanks, > > Isaac Chiang > >
Re: Review Request: CLOUSTACK-2076 : DIsplaying zones causes the UI to go on an infinite scrolling
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10912/#review20167 --- Ship it! Fix looks good .Nice way to use a boolean flag to set the table height accordingly . I'll merge this patch with master . Thanks ! - Pranav Saxena On May 3, 2013, 6:40 a.m., Isaac Chiang wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/10912/ > --- > > (Updated May 3, 2013, 6:40 a.m.) > > > Review request for cloudstack and Pranav Saxena. > > > Description > --- > > This issue is a defect of scrolling in listView. The original scroll event > cause page attribute unlimited increasing. This patch add some conditions to > prevent the situation. > > > This addresses bug CLOUDSTACK-2076. > > > Diffs > - > > ui/scripts/ui/widgets/listView.js f368951 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10912/diff/ > > > Testing > --- > > Test from UI and work as expect. > > > Thanks, > > Isaac Chiang > >
RE: [ACS42] Unassigned fearures and improvements
> -Original Message- > From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com] > Sent: Saturday, May 04, 2013 11:59 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Cc: cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [ACS42] Unassigned fearures and improvements > > A patch was submitted for 1942, but it sat awhile and I've requested it be > adjusted to apply cleanly. [Animesh>] Oh yes I see it now https://reviews.apache.org/r/10423/ > On May 3, 2013 5:29 PM, "Animesh Chaturvedi" > > wrote: > > > > > The following features and improvements are set to 4.2.0 for their fix > > version but are currently unassigned and open. If someone wants to > > take them up, now's the time to assign them to yourself . I will move > > unclaimed item to future on 5/7 > > > > Key Summary Reporter > > CLOUDSTACK-67 ResizingXxYton > > CLOUDSTACK-1147 cloud-setup-* should be removed Wido den Hollander > > CLOUDSTACK-1781 GSoC: Create a cloud in a box using DevCloud > sebastien > > goasguen > > CLOUDSTACK-1782 GSoC: Improve CloudStack support in apache whirr and > > incubator-provisioner to created hadoop clusters sebastien goasguen > > CLOUDSTACK-1942 allow choosing IP when calling associateIpAddress > > Marcus Sorensen > > CLOUDSTACK-1952 Provide a DSL framework for cloudstack Marvin > Prasanna > > Santhanam > > CLOUDSTACK-129 introduce listIsolationMethods API Murali Reddy > > CLOUDSTACK-212 Switch java package structure from com.cloud to > org.apache > > Chip Childers > > CLOUDSTACK-1097 Increase the max length of resource tag value Mice Xia > > CLOUDSTACK-1525 Add section on how to ssh in to system VMs Jessica > > Tomechak > > CLOUDSTACK-1580 Make the color for Notifications configurable Mike > > Tutkowski > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > Animesh > >
Re: Review Request: CLOUSTACK-2076 : DIsplaying zones causes the UI to go on an infinite scrolling
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10912/#review20168 --- Merged with master . Please mark the review request as Submitted . Thanks for the patch ! - Pranav Saxena On May 3, 2013, 6:40 a.m., Isaac Chiang wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/10912/ > --- > > (Updated May 3, 2013, 6:40 a.m.) > > > Review request for cloudstack and Pranav Saxena. > > > Description > --- > > This issue is a defect of scrolling in listView. The original scroll event > cause page attribute unlimited increasing. This patch add some conditions to > prevent the situation. > > > This addresses bug CLOUDSTACK-2076. > > > Diffs > - > > ui/scripts/ui/widgets/listView.js f368951 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10912/diff/ > > > Testing > --- > > Test from UI and work as expect. > > > Thanks, > > Isaac Chiang > >
Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-2178 : "Add guest network" button is not responding
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10882/#review20169 --- Review comment on the corresponding JIRA ticket to verify if its actually a valid bug . If yes , then we'll definitely proceed with validating the fix . Thanks ! - Pranav Saxena On May 1, 2013, 3:49 p.m., Isaac Chiang wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/10882/ > --- > > (Updated May 1, 2013, 3:49 p.m.) > > > Review request for cloudstack and Pranav Saxena. > > > Description > --- > > The root cause of the issue is that the makeForm function in dialog.js cannot > work with dependsOn field correctly. > > Changed : > 1. Dialog.js : Modify makeForm function in Dialog.js to work correctly > with "dependsOn" field. > 2. Network.js : Add checking for response in the call back function. > > > This addresses bug CLOUDSTACK-2178. > > > Diffs > - > > ui/scripts/network.js 9ba725a > ui/scripts/ui/dialog.js bb372fb > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10882/diff/ > > > Testing > --- > > Test from ui ans work well > > > Thanks, > > Isaac Chiang > >
Re: [ACS42] Unassigned fearures and improvements
I picked 1525…easy enough. On May 3, 2013, at 7:28 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > > The following features and improvements are set to 4.2.0 for their fix > version but are currently unassigned and open. If someone wants to take them > up, now's the time to assign them to yourself . I will move unclaimed item > to future on 5/7 > > Key Summary Reporter > CLOUDSTACK-67 ResizingXxYton > CLOUDSTACK-1147 cloud-setup-* should be removed Wido den Hollander > CLOUDSTACK-1781 GSoC: Create a cloud in a box using DevCloud > sebastien goasguen > CLOUDSTACK-1782 GSoC: Improve CloudStack support in apache whirr and > incubator-provisioner to created hadoop clusters sebastien goasguen > CLOUDSTACK-1942 allow choosing IP when calling associateIpAddress > Marcus Sorensen > CLOUDSTACK-1952 Provide a DSL framework for cloudstack Marvin > Prasanna Santhanam > CLOUDSTACK-129introduce listIsolationMethods API Murali Reddy > CLOUDSTACK-212Switch java package structure from com.cloud to > org.apache Chip Childers > CLOUDSTACK-1097 Increase the max length of resource tag value Mice Xia > CLOUDSTACK-1525 Add section on how to ssh in to system VMs Jessica > Tomechak > CLOUDSTACK-1580 Make the color for Notifications configurable Mike > Tutkowski > > > Thanks! > > Animesh
Re: [GSOC] Deadline for proposal is May 3rd !!!
Hi Sebastien, Hi submitted my proposal before the deadline, however I checked today the latest version was not on the system. So please attached is my proposal Best Regards, Adama On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 2:40 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > Hi, > > Deadline for student proposal is May 3rd (this coming Friday). > > Make sure you get your proposal in. You don't need to have all the > answers, it is better to show how you understand the project and how you > plan to tackle it. The community will help you iron things out as your > progress. > > I will be off-line for couple days unfortunately, but folks will help you > if you have questions. > > Do submit the proposals :) > > Cheers, > > -Sebastien
Re: Review Request: fix bug CLOUDSTACK-2160: add a huge size guest network will cause out of memory
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10750/#review20171 --- Commit 63f3ccd4dfc835581305bb57c0878861106dcfe6 in branch refs/heads/vmware-datamodel from Pranav Saxena [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=63f3ccd ] CLOUDSTACK-2160:Refresh button functionality for security groups and statistics tab - ASF Subversion and Git Services On April 24, 2013, 4:20 a.m., Hongtu Zang wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/10750/ > --- > > (Updated April 24, 2013, 4:20 a.m.) > > > Review request for cloudstack, Likitha Shetty, Prasanna Santhanam, and mice > xia. > > > Description > --- > > fix bug CLOUDSTACK-2160: add a huge size guest network will cause out of > memory > > modify NetUtils.java getAllIpsFromCidr, it will returns no more than 255 > unused ips. > > > This addresses bug CLOUDSTACK-2160. > > > Diffs > - > > server/src/com/cloud/network/NetworkModelImpl.java c5930d9 > server/src/com/cloud/network/NetworkServiceImpl.java ac2ac45 > utils/src/com/cloud/utils/net/NetUtils.java 5988dd5 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10750/diff/ > > > Testing > --- > > create a new network with netmask 255.0.0.0 and it won't cause out of memory > > > Thanks, > > Hongtu Zang > >
Cloud Stack development
HI ALL DEARS I downloaded cloud stack from git clone https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack.git I followed the instructions from http://cloudstack.apache.org/develop/environment.html but there is a problem when I want to compile code , ant clean-all build-all 1. bulid.xml does not find in cloud sack source folder please some body tell me what exactly I should do. Mehdi Ali Soltani
