Accepted xfree86 4.2.1-5 (powerpc all source)

[Branden Robinson]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 12:02:40 -0500
Source: xfree86
Binary: xlibmesa3-gl xserver-common libxaw7-dbg xlibmesa-glu-dev xbase-clients 
twm xlibmesa3-dbg xfonts-scalable xfonts-75dpi libdps1-dbg xlib6g-dev xmh 
libxaw6-dbg xfwp xlibs xlibosmesa3-dbg xlibmesa3-glu libdps-dev 
xserver-xfree86-dbg xlibmesa-dev xserver-xfree86 libdps1 proxymngr 
xlibmesa3-glu-dbg xfonts-base-transcoded xlibmesa-gl-dev libxaw6-dev lbxproxy 
xfonts-cyrillic xlibmesa3-gl-dbg xlib6g x-window-system-core xutils xspecs 
xlibs-pic x-window-system xfree86-common xfs xlibmesa3 xfonts-base xlibs-dbg 
libxaw7-dev xnest xfonts-100dpi-transcoded libxaw6 xfonts-100dpi xterm 
xfonts-75dpi-transcoded xprt xlibosmesa-dev xvfb libxaw7 xlibosmesa3 xdm 
xlibs-dev
Architecture: source powerpc all
Version: 4.2.1-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 lbxproxy   - Low Bandwidth X (LBX) proxy server
 libdps-dev - Display PostScript (DPS) client library development files
 libdps1- Display PostScript (DPS) client library
 libdps1-dbg - Display PostScript (DPS) client library (unstripped)
 libxaw6- X Athena widget set library (version 6)
 libxaw6-dbg - X Athena widget set library (version 6) (unstripped)
 libxaw6-dev - X Athena widget set library development files (version 6)
 libxaw7- X Athena widget set library
 libxaw7-dbg - X Athena widget set library (unstripped)
 libxaw7-dev - X Athena widget set library development files
 proxymngr  - X proxy services manager
 twm- Tab window manager
 x-window-system - X Window System
 x-window-system-core - X Window System core components
 xbase-clients - miscellaneous X clients
 xdm- X display manager
 xfonts-100dpi - 100 dpi fonts for X
 xfonts-100dpi-transcoded - 100 dpi fonts for X (transcoded from ISO 10646-1)
 xfonts-75dpi - 75 dpi fonts for X
 xfonts-75dpi-transcoded - 75 dpi fonts for X (transcoded from ISO 10646-1)
 xfonts-base - standard fonts for X
 xfonts-base-transcoded - standard fonts for X (transcoded from ISO 10646-1)
 xfonts-cyrillic - Cyrillic fonts for X
 xfonts-scalable - scalable fonts for X
 xfree86-common - X Window System (XFree86) infrastructure
 xfs- X font server
 xfwp   - X firewall proxy server
 xlib6g - pseudopackage providing X libraries
 xlib6g-dev - pseudopackage providing X library development files
 xlibmesa-dev - XFree86 Mesa development libraries pseudopackage
 xlibmesa-gl-dev - Mesa 3D graphics library development files [XFree86]
 xlibmesa-glu-dev - Mesa OpenGL utility library development files [XFree86]
 xlibmesa3  - XFree86 Mesa libraries pseudopackage
 xlibmesa3-dbg - XFree86 Mesa unstripped libraries pseudopackage
 xlibmesa3-gl - Mesa 3D graphics library [XFree86]
 xlibmesa3-gl-dbg - Mesa 3D graphics library (unstripped) [XFree86]
 xlibmesa3-glu - Mesa OpenGL utility library [XFree86]
 xlibmesa3-glu-dbg - Mesa OpenGL utility library (unstripped) [XFree86]
 xlibosmesa-dev - Mesa off-screen rendering library development files [XFree86]
 xlibosmesa3 - Mesa off-screen rendering library [XFree86]
 xlibosmesa3-dbg - Mesa off-screen rendering library (unstripped) [XFree86]
 xlibs  - X Window System client libraries
 xlibs-dbg  - X Window System client libraries (unstripped)
 xlibs-dev  - X Window System client library development files
 xlibs-pic  - X Window System client extension library PIC archives
 xmh- X interface to the MH mail system
 xnest  - nested X server
 xprt   - X print server (XFree86 version)
 xserver-common - files and utilities common to all X servers
 xserver-xfree86 - the XFree86 X server
 xserver-xfree86-dbg - the XFree86 X server (static version with debugging 
symbols)
 xspecs - X protocol, extension, and library technical specifications
 xterm  - X terminal emulator
 xutils - X Window System utility programs
 xvfb   - virtual framebuffer X server
Closes: 95951 166234 167212 167448 168791 170508 170509 170510 170513 170638 
170678 171294 174282 174589 175157
Changes: 
 xfree86 (4.2.1-5) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Thanks to ISHIKAWA Mutsumi for authoring, identifying, and otherwise
 helping out with patches to fix bugs in the ServersOnly build when X
 library headers aren't installed in the build environment.
 (Closes: #170508,#170510)
 .
   * patch #000_stolen_from_HEAD:
 + dropped patch "Fix the number of beeps when using AccessX and XKB
   (#A.1302, Alan Coopersmith)" since it causes the server to beep nonstop
   until it's restarted if you press Shift-NumLock to enable PointerKeys.
   ("xset b off" shuts it up, but it's just beeping silently, as a
   subsequent "xset b on" reveals) (Closes: #171294)
 + GLU and GLw aren't extension libraries, so key their default build
   status to BuildLibraries. (David Dawes)
 + BuildServersOnly fix when building on a system 

Bug#176768: marked as done (xlibs: libXrender shlib dependency needs to be bumped to >> 4.2.0)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 22 Jan 2003 01:40:39 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#174589: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Jan 2003 02:10:07 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 14 20:10:07 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from boof.brainfood.com (gradall.private.brainfood.com) 
[65.125.64.189] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18Yd0J-0004n2-00; Tue, 14 Jan 2003 20:10:07 -0600
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] ident=adam)
by gradall.private.brainfood.com with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 18Yd0I-0006fM-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 14 Jan 2003 20:10:06 -0600
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 20:10:06 -0600 (CST)
From: Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-X-Sender: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: gtetrinet fails to load, missing symbols
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.2 required=5.0
tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT_PINE
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

package: gtetrinet
version: 0.5.2-1
severity: important

bash-2.05b$ gtetrinet -c tetrinet.debian.net
gtetrinet: relocation error: /usr/X11R6/lib/libXft.so.2: undefined symbol:
XRenderCompositeText8

The version of libxft2 on my system is 2.1-6.



---
Received: (at 174589-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Jan 2003 06:53:03 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 22 00:53:02 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18bEkw-0002d4-00; Wed, 22 Jan 2003 00:53:02 -0600
Received: from rdonald by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 18bEYx-0006ew-00; Wed, 22 Jan 2003 01:40:39 -0500
From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.20 $
Subject: Bug#174589: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-5
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Randall Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 01:40:39 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xfree86, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

lbxproxy_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/lbxproxy_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libdps-dev_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps-dev_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libdps1-dbg_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps1-dbg_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libdps1_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps1_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libxaw6-dbg_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxaw6-dbg_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libxaw6-dev_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxaw6-dev_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libxaw6_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxaw6_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libxaw7-dbg_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxaw7-dbg_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libxaw7-dev_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxaw7-dev_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libxaw7_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxaw7_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
proxymngr_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/proxymngr_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
twm_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/twm_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
x-window-system-core_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/x-window-system-core_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
x-window-system_4.2.1-5_all.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/x-window-system_4.2.1-5_all.deb
xbase-clients_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/xbase-clients_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
xdm_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/xdm_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
xfonts-100dpi-transcoded_4.2.1-5_all.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/xfonts-100dpi-transcoded_4.2.1-5_all.deb
xfonts-100dpi_4.2.1-5_all.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/xfonts-100dpi_4.2.1-5_all.deb
xfonts-75dpi-transcoded_4.2.1-5_all.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/xfonts-75dpi-transcoded_4.2.1-5_all.deb
xfonts-75dpi_4.2.1-5_all.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/xfonts-75dpi_4.2.1-5_all.deb
xfonts-base-transcoded_4.2.1-5_all.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/xfonts-base-transcoded_4.2.1-5_all.deb
xfonts-base_4.2.1-5_all.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/xfonts-base_4.2.1-5_all.deb
xfonts-cyrillic_4.2.1-5_all.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/xfonts-cyrillic_4.2.1-5_all.deb
xfonts-scalable_4.2.1-5_all.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/xfonts-scalable

Bug#174589: marked as done (xlibs: libXrender shlib dependency needs to be bumped to >> 4.2.0)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 22 Jan 2003 01:40:39 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#174589: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Dec 2002 02:19:44 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 28 20:19:44 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from relais.videotron.ca (VL-MS-MR004.sc1.videotron.ca) 
[24.201.245.36] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18ST3H-00088M-00; Sat, 28 Dec 2002 20:19:43 -0600
Received: from apocalypse ([24.201.146.138]) by VL-MS-MR004.sc1.videotron.ca
 (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 0.9 (built Jul 29 2002))
 with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 28 Dec 2002 21:20:56 -0500 (EST)
Received: from eric by apocalypse with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 18ST3G-jM-00; Sat, 28 Dec 2002 21:19:42 -0500
Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2002 21:19:42 -0500
From: Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libXrender API change, shlibs needs updating
Sender: Eric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.10
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0
tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: xlibs
Version: 4.2.1-4
Severity: normal
Tags: sid

Between xfree 4.1 and 4.2 these symbols were added to libXrender (at
least):

XRenderCompositeText8
XRenderCompositeText16
XRenderCompositeText32

but the shlibs file still lists the dependency on 4.1.0. It should be:

libXrender  1 xlibs (>> 4.2.0)

libxft2 uses these calls, so although it claims to depend on xlibs (>>
4.1.0) it will fail to load if xlibs 4.1.x is installed.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux apocalypse 2.4.20 #1 Fri Dec 20 18:08:05 EST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US

Versions of packages xlibs depends on:
ii  libc6 2.3.1-8GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libfreetype6  2.1.3-4FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii  xfree86-common4.2.1-4X Window System (XFree86) infrastr

-- no debconf information


---
Received: (at 174589-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Jan 2003 06:53:03 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 22 00:53:02 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18bEkw-0002d4-00; Wed, 22 Jan 2003 00:53:02 -0600
Received: from rdonald by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 18bEYx-0006ew-00; Wed, 22 Jan 2003 01:40:39 -0500
From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.20 $
Subject: Bug#174589: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-5
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Randall Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 01:40:39 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xfree86, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

lbxproxy_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/lbxproxy_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libdps-dev_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps-dev_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libdps1-dbg_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps1-dbg_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libdps1_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps1_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libxaw6-dbg_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxaw6-dbg_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libxaw6-dev_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxaw6-dev_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libxaw6_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxaw6_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libxaw7-dbg_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxaw7-dbg_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libxaw7-dev_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxaw7-dev_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libxaw7_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxaw7_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
proxymngr_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/proxymngr_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
twm_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/twm_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
x-window-system-core_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/x-window-system-core_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
x-window-system_4.2.1-5_all.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/x-window-system_4.2.1-5_all.

Bug#175850: marked as done (xlibs: shlibs need tightening to 4.2.0)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 22 Jan 2003 01:40:39 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#174589: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Jan 2003 15:00:07 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 08 09:00:06 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from f126.pav1.hotmail.com (hotmail.com) [64.4.31.126] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18WHgc-00021y-00; Wed, 08 Jan 2003 09:00:06 -0600
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC;
 Wed, 8 Jan 2003 06:54:16 -0800
Received: from 200.86.167.63 by pv1fd.pav1.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP;
Wed, 08 Jan 2003 14:54:15 GMT
X-Originating-IP: [200.86.167.63]
From: "Carol Elena Chamblas Robles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bcc: 
Subject: libxft2: Qt3 application don't link because failed dependencies.
Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2003 11:54:15 -0300
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Jan 2003 14:54:16. (UTC) 
FILETIME=[D0875C00:01C2B725]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0
tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

Subject: libxft2: Qt3 application don't link because failed dependencies.
Package: libxft2
Version: 2.1-5
Severity: normal

A QT3 application don't link, with the following error:



g++  -o xml main.o structureparser.o   -L/usr/share/qt/lib
-L/usr/X11R6/lib -lqt -lXext -lX11 -lm
/usr/X11R6/lib/libXft.so.2: undefined reference to
`XRenderCompositeText32'
/usr/X11R6/lib/libXft.so.2: undefined reference to
`XRenderCompositeText16'
/usr/X11R6/lib/libXft.so.2: undefined reference to
`XRenderCompositeText8'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [xml] Error 1



Seems that your package misses a dependency with xlibs > 4.2.0


-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux pccarol 2.4.18-bf2.4 #1 Son Apr 14 09:53:28 CEST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages libxft2 depends on:
ii  libc6 2.3.1-5GNU C Library: Shared libraries 
an
ii  libfontconfig12.1-12 generic font configuration 
library
ii  libfreetype6  2.1.3-4FreeType 2 font engine, shared 
lib
ii  xlibs 4.1.0-16   X Window System client 
libraries
ii  zlib1g1:1.1.4-9  compression library - runtime

_
MSN Fotos: la forma más fácil de compartir e imprimir fotos. 
http://photos.msn.es/support/worldwide.aspx


---
Received: (at 174589-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Jan 2003 06:53:03 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 22 00:53:02 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18bEkw-0002d4-00; Wed, 22 Jan 2003 00:53:02 -0600
Received: from rdonald by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 18bEYx-0006ew-00; Wed, 22 Jan 2003 01:40:39 -0500
From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.20 $
Subject: Bug#174589: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-5
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Randall Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 01:40:39 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xfree86, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

lbxproxy_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/lbxproxy_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libdps-dev_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps-dev_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libdps1-dbg_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps1-dbg_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libdps1_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps1_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libxaw6-dbg_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxaw6-dbg_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libxaw6-dev_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxaw6-dev_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libxaw6_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxaw6_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libxaw7-dbg_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxaw7-dbg_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libxaw7-dev_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxaw7-dev_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libxaw7_4.2.

Bug#95951: marked as done (xlibs: [libICE] message replies do not work properly for subprotocols)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 22 Jan 2003 01:40:39 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#95951: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 May 2001 14:15:33 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 01 09:15:33 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.uni-kl.de [131.246.137.52] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14uaw9-00055p-00; Tue, 01 May 2001 09:15:33 -0500
Received: from helios.mathematik.uni-kl.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [131.246.164.27])
by mail.uni-kl.de (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f41EFUC26292
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 1 May 2001 16:15:30 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from mathematik.uni-kl.de (neutron.mathematik.uni-kl.de 
[131.246.164.16])
by helios.mathematik.uni-kl.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA25471
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 1 May 2001 16:15:30 +0200 (METDST)
Received: from automatix.mathematik.uni-kl.de
   ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] [131.246.163.119] )
  by neutron.mathematik.uni-kl.de with ESMTP id aa03778 ;
  1 May 2001 16:15 +0200
Received: from voss by automatix.mathematik.uni-kl.de with local (Exim 3.22 #1 
(Debian))
id 14uaw5-0001oq-00; Tue, 01 May 2001 16:15:29 +0200
From: Jochen Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [libICE] message replies do not work properly for subprotocols
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.15
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.15
Date: Tue, 01 May 2001 16:15:29 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: xlibs
Version: 4.0.3-1
Severity: normal

Hi,

I found a bug in the ICE library.  Below, I append a patch
to fix this.  Unfortunately the situation is somewhat
complex, so it is not easy to reproduce the problem and to
verify the correctness of my patch.

A sample program to reproduce the problem may be downloaded
from

http://www.mathematik.uni-kl.de/~wwwstoch/voss/icebreaker-1.0.tar.gz

If you have any questions I will be glad to provide further
explanations.


DESCRIPTION OF THE PROBLEM:

When two hosts communicate over an ICE connection and use
different major opcodes for a subprotocol, it is impossible
to use message replies.

Let HOST-A and HOST-B be two hosts which communicate over an
ICE connection and use a subprotocol PROT.  Both have
obtained an opcode for PROT, HOST-A got the opcode 1 from
`IceRegisterForProtocolSetup' and HOST-B got the opcode 2
from `IceRegisterForProtocolReply' (he uses several
protocols simultaneously, so the value is not 1).

Now HOST-A sents a message wich requires a reply.  In order
to do so he sets up an `IceReplyWaitInfo' and calls
`IceProcessMessages':

IceReplyWaitInfo  reply_info;
Bool  reply_ready;

reply_info.sequence_of_request = IceLastSentSequenceNumber (ice_conn);
reply_info.major_opcode_of_request = opcode;
reply_info.minor_opcode_of_request = PROT_Question;
reply_info.reply = reply;

do {
IceProcessMessagesStatus  process_status;

process_status = IceProcessMessages (ice_conn,
 &reply_info, &reply_ready);
...
} while (! reply_ready);

The `reply_info.major_opcode_of_request' field contains the
value 1, now.

Next, HOST-B's reply arrives while HOST-A is executing the
function `IceProcessMessages'.  Within this function, the
`reply_wait' is registered via the command

_IceAddReplyWait (iceConn, replyWait);

This makes ICE wait for something with major opcode 1.  But
the variable `header' has `header->majorOpcode == 2',
because HOST-B sent it this way.  So the following call

useThisReplyWait = _IceSearchReplyWaits (iceConn, header->majorOpcode);

(also from `IceProcessMessages') does not find my
`reply_wait' because ICE searchs for the major opcode 2, not
1!  I think this is a bug in the ICE library.


SAMPLE FIX:

The following fix modifies `IceProcessMessages' to translate
opcodes before comparing them.  The patch is against the
XFree86-3.3 source, but maybe it will apply anyway.

*** process.c~  Sun May  3 16:54:52 1998
--- process.c   Sun May  3 16:54:39 1998
***
*** 1,5 
--- 1,6 
  /* $XConsortium: process.c,v 1.43 94/08/25 15:44:43 mor Exp $ */
  /* $XFree86: xc/lib/ICE/process.c,v 3.1 1994/09/17 13:43:45 dawes Exp $ */
+ /* Changed by Jochen Voss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) */
  
/

Bug#170638: marked as done (Create /tmp/.X11-unix as soon as possible)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 22 Jan 2003 01:40:38 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#170638: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Nov 2002 08:22:16 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 25 02:22:15 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from boden.synopsys.com [204.176.20.19] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18GEVS-0004aU-00; Mon, 25 Nov 2002 02:22:14 -0600
Received: from mother.synopsys.com (mother.synopsys.com [146.225.100.171])
by boden.synopsys.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D58E5E9F8
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 25 Nov 2002 00:21:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from goofy.gr05.synopsys.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mother.synopsys.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id AAA04646;
Mon, 25 Nov 2002 00:20:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Synopsys.COM ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [146.225.224.165])
by goofy.gr05.synopsys.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA26455;
Mon, 25 Nov 2002 09:21:37 +0100 (MET)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 09:21:37 +0100
From: Harald Dunkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3a) Gecko/20021122
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Create /tmp/.X11-unix as soon as possible
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0
tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MOZILLA_UA
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: xserver-common
Version: 4.2.1-3

Hi Branden,

If there is no display manager installed, then it is possible
that a Xvnc session is started before the lokal XWindow server.
In this case Xvnc creates /tmp/.X11-unix with the wrong
permissions, and XFree86 will refuse to start. I had exactly
this problem a few minutes ago.

I would suggest to create /tmp/.X11-unix at boot time by one
of the startup scripts.


Regards

Harri


---
Received: (at 170638-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Jan 2003 06:54:03 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 22 00:54:03 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18bElu-0002gm-00; Wed, 22 Jan 2003 00:54:02 -0600
Received: from rdonald by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 18bEYw-0006eo-00; Wed, 22 Jan 2003 01:40:38 -0500
From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.20 $
Subject: Bug#170638: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-5
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Randall Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 01:40:38 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xfree86, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

lbxproxy_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/lbxproxy_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libdps-dev_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps-dev_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libdps1-dbg_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps1-dbg_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libdps1_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps1_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libxaw6-dbg_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxaw6-dbg_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libxaw6-dev_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxaw6-dev_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libxaw6_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxaw6_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libxaw7-dbg_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxaw7-dbg_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libxaw7-dev_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxaw7-dev_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libxaw7_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxaw7_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
proxymngr_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/proxymngr_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
twm_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/twm_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
x-window-system-core_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/x-window-system-core_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
x-window-system_4.2.1-5_all.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/x-window-system_4.2.1-5_all.deb
xbase-clients_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/xbase-clients_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
xdm_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/xdm_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
xfonts-100dpi-transcoded_4.2.1-5_all.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/xfonts-100dpi-transcoded_4.2.1-5_all.deb
xfonts-1

Bug#170513: marked as done (/etc/X11/xfs/xfs.options documentation typo?)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 22 Jan 2003 01:40:38 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#170513: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at bugs) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Nov 2002 10:48:31 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 24 04:48:31 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from miranda.axis.se [193.13.178.2] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18FuJS-0003mY-00; Sun, 24 Nov 2002 04:48:30 -0600
Received: from cicero.axis.se (cicero.axis.se [10.13.1.40])
by miranda.axis.se (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian -4) with ESMTP id 
gAOAlwoP006310
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 24 Nov 2002 11:47:58 +0100
Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 11:47:58 +0100 (CET)
From: Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: /etc/X11/xfs/xfs.options documentation typo?
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organisation: Axis Communications AB 
X-Sucks: Microsoft
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.2 required=5.0
tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT_PINE
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: xfs
Version: 4.2.1-4
Severity: minor
Tags: sid

`man 5 xfs.options' points to a /etc/X11/xfs/xfs.options file. That file
 ^
does not exist. /etc/X11/fs/xfs.options does.

Either the man page should be changed or the directory xfs gets its conf
files from. I tend to think /etc/X11/xfs is a more natural choice than
/etc/X11/fs.


Cheers,
Cristian

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux my-box 2.4.19 #1 Thu Aug 8 22:22:57 CEST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=

Versions of packages xfs depends on:
ii  debconf   1.2.16 Debian configuration management sy
ii  libc6 2.3.1-5GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  zlib1g1:1.1.4-8  compression library - runtime

-- debconf information:
* xfs/default_100dpi:
* xfs/default_nolisten_tcp:


---
Received: (at 170513-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Jan 2003 06:54:03 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 22 00:54:01 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18bElt-0002gg-00; Wed, 22 Jan 2003 00:54:01 -0600
Received: from rdonald by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 18bEYw-0006em-00; Wed, 22 Jan 2003 01:40:38 -0500
From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.20 $
Subject: Bug#170513: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-5
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Randall Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 01:40:38 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xfree86, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

lbxproxy_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/lbxproxy_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libdps-dev_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps-dev_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libdps1-dbg_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps1-dbg_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libdps1_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps1_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libxaw6-dbg_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxaw6-dbg_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libxaw6-dev_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxaw6-dev_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libxaw6_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxaw6_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libxaw7-dbg_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxaw7-dbg_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libxaw7-dev_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxaw7-dev_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libxaw7_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxaw7_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
proxymngr_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/proxymngr_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
twm_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/twm_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
x-window-system-core_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/x-window-system-core_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
x-window-system_4.2.1-5_all.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/x-window-system_4.2.1-5_all.deb
xbase-clients_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/xbase-clients_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
xdm_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/

Bug#163837: marked as done (xbase-clients: [startx] hostname version printed to stdout)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 22 Jan 2003 01:40:37 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#167212: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Oct 2002 18:57:52 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 08 13:57:52 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 046.catv45.aar01.lan.ch (bolli.homeip.net) [212.60.45.46] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17yzYF-0004DV-00; Tue, 08 Oct 2002 13:57:51 -0500
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by bolli.homeip.net (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 4EB5567DB0; Tue,  8 Oct 2002 20:57:19 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2002 20:57:06 +0200
From: "Beat Bolli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: from bolli.homeip.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by localhost (AvMailGate-2.0.0.6) id 26586-4E36A24E;
Tue, 08 Oct 2002 20:57:07 +0200
Received: by bolli.homeip.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id C57B067DF4; Tue,  8 Oct 2002 20:57:06 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: startx: hostname version is displayed
To: "Debian Bug Tracking System" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-AntiVirus: OK! AntiVir MailGate Version 2.0.0.6
 at gw.bolli.homeip.net has not found any known virus in this email.
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.0
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: xbase-clients
Version: 4.2.1-1
Severity: minor
Tags: sid patch

When starting X, the hostname version string is displayed. This comes from
the Xauth setup in startx. The Debian version of hostname outputs its version
string to stderr. The following patch suppresses this error:

--- startx.orig 2002-10-04 22:49:05.0 +0200
+++ startx  2002-10-08 20:27:31.0 +0200
@@ -116,7 +116,7 @@
 # set up default Xauth info for this machine
 case `uname` in
 Linux*)
-   if [ -z "`hostname --version | grep GNU`" ]; then
+   if [ -z "`hostname --version 2>/dev/null | grep GNU`" ]; then
hostname=`hostname -f`
else
hostname=`hostname`


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux gw.bolli.homeip.net 2.4.18-586tsc #1 Sun Apr 14 10:57:57 EST 2002 
i586
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages xbase-clients depends on:
ii  cpp  2:2.95.4-17 The GNU C preprocessor.
ii  debconf  1.2.10  Debian configuration management sy
ii  libc62.2.5-15GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libdps1  4.2.1-1 Display PostScript (DPS) client li
ii  libfreetype6 2.1.2-7 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii  libncurses5  5.2.20020112a-8 Shared libraries for terminal hand
ii  libxaw7  4.2.1-1 X Athena widget set library
ii  xlibmesa3 [libgl1]   4.2.1-1 XFree86 version of Mesa 3D graphic
ii  xlibs4.2.1-1 X Window System client libraries

-- debconf information:
* xbase-clients/default_100dpi: 
* xbase-clients/default_nolisten_tcp: 


---
Received: (at 167212-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Jan 2003 06:53:57 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 22 00:53:57 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18bEln-0002g5-00; Wed, 22 Jan 2003 00:53:56 -0600
Received: from rdonald by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 18bEYv-0006ea-00; Wed, 22 Jan 2003 01:40:37 -0500
From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.20 $
Subject: Bug#167212: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-5
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Randall Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 01:40:37 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xfree86, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

lbxproxy_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/lbxproxy_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libdps-dev_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps-dev_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libdps1-dbg_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps1-dbg_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libdps1_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps1_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libxaw6-dbg_4.2.1-5

Bug#167212: marked as done (xbase-clients: [startx] hostname version printed to stdout)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 22 Jan 2003 01:40:37 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#167212: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Oct 2002 10:36:39 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 31 04:36:39 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from tigris.prim.hu [212.108.197.149] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 187Cgo-0004VF-00; Thu, 31 Oct 2002 04:36:38 -0600
Received: from prim.adsl.tvnet.hu ([195.38.109.242] helo=tulip)
by tigris.prim.hu with asmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 187CbX-0003dy-00; Thu, 31 Oct 2002 11:31:11 +0100
Received: from raszi by tulip with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 187Cgo-OA-00; Thu, 31 Oct 2002 11:36:38 +0100
From: KARASZI Istvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: xbase-clients: startx has a bug when tries to identify hostname
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10.2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 11:36:38 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0
tests=PATCH_UNIFIED_DIFF,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: xbase-clients
Version: 4.2.1-3
Severity: normal

I found a bug in startx script. It tries to identify hostname version, with
hostname --version but hostname prints its version to stderr, not stdout.
Therefore the version printed to stderr and the startx script cannot get the
version string.

Here is the small patch:

--- cut ---

--- /usr/bin/X11/startx 2002-10-16 22:14:22.0 +0200
+++ startx  2002-10-30 22:23:23.0 +0100
@@ -116,7 +116,7 @@
 # set up default Xauth info for this machine
 case `uname` in
 Linux*)
-   if [ -z "`hostname --version | grep GNU`" ]; then
+   if [ -z "`hostname --version 2>&1 | grep GNU`" ]; then
hostname=`hostname -f`
else
hostname=`hostname`

--- paste ---

KARASZI Istvan


-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Kernel Version: Linux tulip 2.4.19 #1 Thu Aug 29 11:53:33 CEST 2002 i686 
Intel(R) Pentium(R) III Mobile CPU   866MHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux

Versions of the packages xbase-clients depends on:
ii  cpp2.95.4-17  The GNU C preprocessor.
ii  debconf1.2.13 Debian configuration management system
ii  libc6  2.3.1-3GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone
ii  libdps14.2.1-3Display PostScript (DPS) client library
ii  libfreetype6   2.1.2-10   FreeType 2 font engine, shared library files
ii  libncurses55.2.20020112a- Shared libraries for terminal handling
ii  libxaw74.2.1-3X Athena widget set library
ii  xlibmesa3  4.2.1-3XFree86 version of Mesa 3D graphics library
ii  xlibs  4.2.1-3X Window System client libraries
ii  xlibmesa3  4.2.1-3XFree86 version of Mesa 3D graphics library
^^^ (Provides virtual package libgl1)

---
Received: (at 167212-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Jan 2003 06:53:57 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 22 00:53:57 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18bEln-0002g5-00; Wed, 22 Jan 2003 00:53:56 -0600
Received: from rdonald by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 18bEYv-0006ea-00; Wed, 22 Jan 2003 01:40:37 -0500
From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.20 $
Subject: Bug#167212: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-5
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Randall Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 01:40:37 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xfree86, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

lbxproxy_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/lbxproxy_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libdps-dev_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps-dev_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libdps1-dbg_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps1-dbg_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libdps1_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps1_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libxaw6-dbg_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxaw6-dbg_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libxaw6-dev_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxaw6-dev_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libxaw6_4.2.

Bug#170510: marked as done (xfree86: FTBFS on arm,mips, mipsel: xc/programs/Xserver/xkb/xkberrs.c assumes X11/Xlib.h and X11/XKBlib.h available)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 22 Jan 2003 01:40:38 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#170510: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Nov 2002 10:07:07 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 24 04:07:06 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from pcp942041pcs.cstltn01.in.comcast.net (apocalypse.deadbeast.net) 
[68.57.244.226] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18FtfO-0001TX-00; Sun, 24 Nov 2002 04:07:06 -0600
Received: by apocalypse.deadbeast.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id A41B13D6B; Sun, 24 Nov 2002 05:06:35 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: xfree86: FTBFS on arm: xc/programs/Xserver/xkb/xkberrs.c assumes
X11/Xlib.h and X11/XKBlib.h available
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.9
Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 05:06:35 -0500
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=5.0
tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,SUPERLONG_LINE,UPPERCASE_25_50
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: xfree86
Version: 4.2.1-4
Severity: serious
Tags: help

gcc -c -g -O2 -fsigned-char-I../include -I../../../exports/include/X11 
-I../../../include/extensions -I../../../programs/Xserver/Xext 
-I../../../programs/Xserver/mi  -I../../.. -I../../../exports/include 
-I/usr/X11R6/include  -Dlinux -D__arm__ -D__arm32__ -U__arm -Uarm 
-D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=199309L -D_POSIX_SOURCE -D_XOPEN_SOURCE -D_BSD_SOURCE 
-D_SVID_SOURCE  -D_GNU_SOURCE  -DSHAPE -DXINPUT -DXKB -DLBX -DXAPPGROUP 
-DXCSECURITY -DTOGCUP  -DXF86BIGFONT -DDPMSExtension  -DPIXPRIV -DPANORAMIX  
-DRENDER  -DGCCUSESGAS -DAVOID_GLYPHBLT -DPIXPRIV -DSINGLEDEPTH -DXFreeXDGA 
-DXvExtension  -DXFree86Server -DXF86VIDMODE -DXvMCExtension  -DSMART_SCHEDULE 
-DBUILDDEBUG -DX_BYTE_ORDER=X_LITTLE_ENDIAN -DNDEBUG  -DFUNCPROTO=15 
-DNARROWPROTO   -DXKB_IN_SERVER xkberrs.c
xkberrs.c:32: X11/Xlib.h: No such file or directory
xkberrs.c:33: X11/XKBlib.h: No such file or directory
make[6]: *** [xkberrs.o] Error 1
make[6]: Leaving directory 
`/build/buildd/xfree86-4.2.1/build-tree/xc-xserver-xfree86-dbg/programs/Xserver/xkb'

This is even worse than the GLX problem.  Who doesn't build an X server
with XKB support these days?  Assuming the X11 headers are on the box
seems kind of dumb.

It is dawning on me that few people have tried BuildServersOnly since
Alan's commit on the 11th.  :(

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux apocalypse 2.4.18 #1 Fri May 3 19:03:16 EST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C


---
Received: (at 170510-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Jan 2003 06:53:04 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 22 00:53:03 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18bEkx-0002dC-00; Wed, 22 Jan 2003 00:53:03 -0600
Received: from rdonald by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 18bEYw-0006ek-00; Wed, 22 Jan 2003 01:40:38 -0500
From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.20 $
Subject: Bug#170510: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-5
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Randall Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 01:40:38 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xfree86, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

lbxproxy_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/lbxproxy_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libdps-dev_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps-dev_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libdps1-dbg_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps1-dbg_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libdps1_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps1_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libxaw6-dbg_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxaw6-dbg_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libxaw6-dev_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxaw6-dev_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libxaw6_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxaw6_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libxaw7-dbg_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxaw7-dbg_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libxaw7-dev_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxaw7-d

Bug#175157: marked as done (xlibmesa-dev: build-dep incompatibility with mesa)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 22 Jan 2003 01:40:39 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#175157: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Jan 2003 08:50:51 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 03 02:50:51 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from cis10.cyber-dyne.com (bob.shelbyville.oz) [207.189.173.110] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18UNXX-0005xs-00; Fri, 03 Jan 2003 02:50:51 -0600
Received: from ron by bob.shelbyville.oz with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 18UNQC-0005av-00; Fri, 03 Jan 2003 00:43:16 -0800
From: Ron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: xlibmesa-dev: build-dep incompatibility with mesa
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10.2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2003 00:43:16 -0800
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0
tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: xlibmesa-dev
Version: 4.2.1-4
Severity: important

Howdy,

Recent changes to the mesa package aren't reflected in xlibmesa yet.
Packages which used to build-dep on libgl-dev may now need to also add
libglu-dev.  xlibmesa should provide this now too (or it will probably
get passed over as an option to buildd).

It also needs to conflict with mesa-common-dev (else it fails to install
when replacing mesa).

thanks,
Ron

-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Kernel Version: Linux bob 2.4.19 #1 Fri Aug 16 03:40:11 PDT 2002 i686 unknown 
unknown GNU/Linux

Versions of the packages xlibmesa-dev depends on:
ii  libc6-dev  2.3.1-8GNU C Library: Development Libraries and Hea
ii  xlibmesa3  4.2.1-4XFree86 version of Mesa 3D graphics library
ii  xlibs-dev  4.2.1-4X Window System client library development f
ii  libc6-dev  2.3.1-8GNU C Library: Development Libraries and Hea
^^^ (Provides virtual package libc-dev)

---
Received: (at 175157-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Jan 2003 06:54:08 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 22 00:54:07 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18bElz-0002hT-00; Wed, 22 Jan 2003 00:54:07 -0600
Received: from rdonald by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 18bEYx-0006ey-00; Wed, 22 Jan 2003 01:40:39 -0500
From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.20 $
Subject: Bug#175157: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-5
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Randall Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 01:40:39 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xfree86, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

lbxproxy_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/lbxproxy_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libdps-dev_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps-dev_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libdps1-dbg_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps1-dbg_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libdps1_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps1_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libxaw6-dbg_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxaw6-dbg_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libxaw6-dev_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxaw6-dev_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libxaw6_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxaw6_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libxaw7-dbg_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxaw7-dbg_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libxaw7-dev_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxaw7-dev_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libxaw7_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxaw7_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
proxymngr_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/proxymngr_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
twm_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/twm_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
x-window-system-core_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/x-window-system-core_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
x-window-system_4.2.1-5_all.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/x-window-system_4.2.1-5_all.deb
xbase-clients_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/xbase-clients_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
xdm_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/xdm_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
xfonts-100dpi-transcoded_4.2.1-5_all.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/xfonts-100dpi-transcoded_4.2.1-5_all.deb
xfonts-100dpi_4.2.1-5_all.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86

Bug#168791: marked as done (xfs: A fix for xfs segfault)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 22 Jan 2003 01:40:38 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#168791: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Nov 2002 14:37:18 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 12 08:37:18 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from zigzag.lvk.cs.msu.su [158.250.17.23] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18BcAH-00039w-00; Tue, 12 Nov 2002 08:37:18 -0600
Received: from nikita by zigzag.lvk.cs.msu.su with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 18BcAp-0005Jx-00; Tue, 12 Nov 2002 17:37:51 +0300
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: "Nikita V. Youshchenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: xfs: A fix for xfs segfault
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.9
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 17:37:51 +0300
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: "Nikita V. Youshchenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0
tests=PATCH_UNIFIED_DIFF,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: xfs
Version: 4.2.1-3
Severity: important
Tags: patch

After upgrade to Xfree 4.2.1, several times we experienced xfs crashes.
(quite bad, because it causes several user sessions on terminals to crash)
At last one of our users found an reprodusable sequence of actions to
crash xfs. So I've tracked the bug.

It dereferences a NULL pointer in xc/lib/font/fontfile/fontenc.c

The following patch fixes the problem:

--- fontenc.c.orig  Tue Nov 12 17:11:37 2002
+++ fontenc.c   Tue Nov 12 17:25:29 2002
@@ -744,7 +744,7 @@
 /* Check whether the name is already known for this encoding */
 if(strcasecmp(encoding->name, encoding_name) == 0) {
 found = 1;
-} else {
+} else if (encoding->aliases) {
 for(alias=encoding->aliases; *alias; alias++)
 if(!strcasecmp(*alias, encoding_name)) {
 found = 1;
@@ -763,17 +763,21 @@
 if(new_name == NULL)
 return NULL;
 strcpy(new_name, encoding_name);
-for(alias = encoding->aliases; *alias; alias++)
-numaliases++;
+   if (encoding->aliases) {
+for(alias = encoding->aliases; *alias; alias++)
+numaliases++;
+   }
 new_aliases = (char**)xalloc((numaliases+2)*sizeof(char*));
 if(new_aliases == NULL) {
 xfree(new_name);
 return NULL;
 }
-memcpy(new_aliases, encoding->aliases, numaliases*sizeof(char*));
+if (encoding->aliases)  {
+   memcpy(new_aliases, encoding->aliases, 
numaliases*sizeof(char*));
+   xfree(encoding->aliases);
+   }
 new_aliases[numaliases] = new_name;
 new_aliases[numaliases+1] = NULL;
-xfree(encoding->aliases);
 encoding->aliases = new_aliases;
 }
 
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux zigzag 2.4.19 #1 óÒÄ îÏÑ 6 17:54:30 MSK 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=ru_RU.KOI8-R, LC_CTYPE=ru_RU.KOI8-R

Versions of packages xfs depends on:
ii  debconf   1.2.14 Debian configuration management sy
ii  libc6 2.3.1-3GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  zlib1g1:1.1.4-1  compression library - runtime

-- debconf information:
* xfs/default_100dpi: 
* xfs/default_nolisten_tcp: 


---
Received: (at 168791-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Jan 2003 06:53:06 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 22 00:53:06 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18bEky-0002dK-00; Wed, 22 Jan 2003 00:53:04 -0600
Received: from rdonald by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 18bEYw-0006ee-00; Wed, 22 Jan 2003 01:40:38 -0500
From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.20 $
Subject: Bug#168791: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-5
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Randall Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 01:40:38 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

We believe that the bug you reported is fixe

Bug#170508: marked as done (xfree86: FTBFS on alpha, ia64: damned old GLX library assumes X11 headers installed on system)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 22 Jan 2003 01:40:38 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#170508: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Nov 2002 09:55:25 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 24 03:55:24 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from pcp942041pcs.cstltn01.in.comcast.net (apocalypse.deadbeast.net) 
[68.57.244.226] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18FtU4-0001AF-00; Sun, 24 Nov 2002 03:55:24 -0600
Received: by apocalypse.deadbeast.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 153003D6B; Sun, 24 Nov 2002 04:54:54 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: xfree86: FTBFS on alpha: damned old GLX library assumes X11 headers
 installed to system
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.9
Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 04:54:54 -0500
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0
tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,SUPERLONG_LINE
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: xfree86
Version: 4.2.1-4
Severity: serious
Tags: help

making all in lib/GL/glx...
make[6]: Entering directory 
`/build/buildd/xfree86-4.2.1/build-tree/xc-xserver-xfree86-dbg/lib/GL/glx'
rm -f clientattrib.o unshared/clientattrib.o
gcc -c -ansi -pedantic -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wstrict-prototypes 
-Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs 
-Wundef  -I../../../exports/include -I../../../exports/include/X11  
-I../../../include/extensions   -I../../../exports/include/GL   
-I../../../lib/GL/glx   -I../../../extras/Mesa/src  
-I../../../extras/Mesa/src/X86  -I../../../extras/Mesa/include  
-I../../../lib/GL/dri  -I../../.. -I../../../exports/include 
-I/usr/X11R6/include  -Dlinux -D__alpha__ -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=199309L 
-D_POSIX_SOURCE -D_XOPEN_SOURCE -D_BSD_SOURCE -D_SVID_SOURCE  -D_GNU_SOURCE   
-DFUNCPROTO=15 -DNARROWPROTO -DXTHREADS  -D_REENTRANT -DXUSE_MTSAFE_API
-DGLXEXT -DXF86DRI -DGLX_DIRECT_RENDERING -DGLX_USE_DLOPEN -DGLX_USE_MESA 
-D__GLX_ALIGN64 -mieee -D__GLX_ALIGN64   -g -O2 -g  clientattrib.c -o 
unshared/clientattrib.o
In file included from clientattrib.c:39:
glxclient.h:49: X11/Xlibint.h: No such file or directory
In file included from glxclient.h:50,
 from clientattrib.c:39:
../../../exports/include/GL/glx.h:39: X11/Xlib.h: No such file or directory
../../../exports/include/GL/glx.h:40: X11/Xutil.h: No such file or directory
make[6]: *** [clientattrib.o] Error 1

Either have to build X11 library when building GLX library, i.e.:

Change X11.tmpl from:
261 #ifndef BuildX11Lib
262 #define BuildX11Lib BuildLibraries
263 #endif
to:
261 #ifndef BuildX11Lib
262 #define BuildX11Lib BuildLibraries || BuildGLXLibrary
263 #endif

Or figure out how to make lib/X11 dump its headers in xc/export/include and do
nothing else (like build).

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux apocalypse 2.4.18 #1 Fri May 3 19:03:16 EST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C


---
Received: (at 170508-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Jan 2003 06:53:59 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 22 00:53:59 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18bElr-0002gN-00; Wed, 22 Jan 2003 00:53:59 -0600
Received: from rdonald by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 18bEYw-0006eg-00; Wed, 22 Jan 2003 01:40:38 -0500
From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.20 $
Subject: Bug#170508: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-5
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Randall Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 01:40:38 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xfree86, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

lbxproxy_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/lbxproxy_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libdps-dev_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps-dev_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libdps1-dbg_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to p

Bug#174282: marked as done (xlibs: [libXpm] SEGV on Alpha due to undefined LONG64 symbol at compile time)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 22 Jan 2003 01:40:39 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#174282: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Dec 2002 16:58:09 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 25 10:58:09 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from addr-213-139-162-86.suomi.net (Astalo.Niemitalo.local) 
[213.139.162.86] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18RErA-0002r0-00; Wed, 25 Dec 2002 10:58:09 -0600
Received: from saastamoduuli.niemitalo.local ([192.168.100.2])
by Astalo.Niemitalo.local with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 18REr9-0004B5-00; Wed, 25 Dec 2002 18:58:07 +0200
Received: from kalle by Saastamoduuli.Niemitalo.local with local (Exim 3.36 #1 
(Debian))
id 18RErK-0004u7-00; Wed, 25 Dec 2002 18:58:18 +0200
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
Subject: xlibs: Xpm needs LONG64 on Alpha 
Keywords: PutPixel32,SIGSEGV
X-Accept-Language: fi;q=1.0, en;q=0.9, sv;q=0.5, de;q=0.1
From: Kalle Olavi Niemitalo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 25 Dec 2002 18:58:17 +0200
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Lines: 36
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: Kalle Olavi Niemitalo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=5.0
tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,X_ACCEPT_LANG
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: xlibs
Version: 4.2.1-3
Severity: normal

Nighthawk 1.0-14 dies with SIGSEGV on Alpha before it displays
anything.  With GDB and mcheck_pedantic(), I traced the problem
to heap corruption in the Xpm library.  xpmParseDataAndCreate (in
xc/extras/Xpm/lib/create.c) sets ximage->f.put_pixel=PutPixel32,
but the PutPixel32 function assumes that unsigned long is 32-bit,
although it's actually 64-bit on the Alpha.  XPutPixel will then
write past the end of the pixel and often also past the end of a
malloced block.

The Xpm library already tries to support 64-bit processors: if
the WORD64 or LONG64 macro is defined, it disables PutPixel32 and
always uses the more portable functions PitPixel32MSB or
PutPixel32LSB instead.  However, it seems the library was
compiled without these macros.

I guess that WORD64 means int is 64-bit and LONG64 means long is
64-bit; then LONG64 would be appropriate for Debian on the Alpha.

What would be a good place to define the macro?  
already conditionally defines it; should the Xpm sources then
include this header?

-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: alpha
Kernel: Linux Saastamoduuli 2.2.22 #1 Sat Oct 26 18:09:21 EST 2002 alpha
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Versions of packages xlibs depends on:
ii  libc6.1   2.2.5-14.3 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libfreetype6  2.1.2-9FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii  xfree86-common4.2.1-3X Window System (XFree86) infrastr

---
Received: (at 174282-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Jan 2003 06:54:07 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 22 00:54:06 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18bEly-0002hL-00; Wed, 22 Jan 2003 00:54:06 -0600
Received: from rdonald by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 18bEYx-0006eu-00; Wed, 22 Jan 2003 01:40:39 -0500
From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.20 $
Subject: Bug#174282: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-5
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Randall Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 01:40:39 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xfree86, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

lbxproxy_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/lbxproxy_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libdps-dev_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps-dev_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libdps1-dbg_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps1-dbg_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libdps1_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps1_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libxaw6-dbg_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxaw6-dbg_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libxaw6-dev_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxaw6-dev_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libxaw6_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to p

Bug#175854: marked as done (xlibs: shlibs need tightening to 4.2.0)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 22 Jan 2003 01:40:39 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#174589: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Jan 2003 15:24:17 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 08 09:24:15 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from f102.pav1.hotmail.com (hotmail.com) [64.4.31.102] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18WI3z-0004Q5-00; Wed, 08 Jan 2003 09:24:15 -0600
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC;
 Wed, 8 Jan 2003 07:23:07 -0800
Received: from 200.86.167.63 by pv1fd.pav1.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP;
Wed, 08 Jan 2003 15:23:06 GMT
X-Originating-IP: [200.86.167.63]
From: "Carol Elena Chamblas Robles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bcc: 
Subject: libxft2: Qt3 application don't link because failed dependencies.
Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2003 12:23:06 -0300
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Jan 2003 15:23:07.0097 (UTC) 
FILETIME=[D857CC90:01C2B729]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0
tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

Subject: libxft2: Qt3 application don't link because failed dependencies.
Package: libxft2
Version: 2.1-5
Severity: normal

A QT3 application don't link, with the following error:



g++  -o xml main.o structureparser.o   -L/usr/share/qt/lib
-L/usr/X11R6/lib -lqt -lXext -lX11 -lm
/usr/X11R6/lib/libXft.so.2: undefined reference to
`XRenderCompositeText32'
/usr/X11R6/lib/libXft.so.2: undefined reference to
`XRenderCompositeText16'
/usr/X11R6/lib/libXft.so.2: undefined reference to
`XRenderCompositeText8'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [xml] Error 1



Seems that your package misses a dependency with xlibs > 4.2.0


-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux pccarol 2.4.18-bf2.4 #1 Son Apr 14 09:53:28 CEST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages libxft2 depends on:
ii  libc6 2.3.1-5GNU C Library: Shared libraries 
an
ii  libfontconfig12.1-12 generic font configuration 
library
ii  libfreetype6  2.1.3-4FreeType 2 font engine, shared 
lib
ii  xlibs 4.1.0-16   X Window System client 
libraries
ii  zlib1g1:1.1.4-9  compression library - runtime





_
Charla con tus amigos en línea mediante MSN Messenger: 
http://messenger.microsoft.com/es


---
Received: (at 174589-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Jan 2003 06:53:03 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 22 00:53:02 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18bEkw-0002d4-00; Wed, 22 Jan 2003 00:53:02 -0600
Received: from rdonald by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 18bEYx-0006ew-00; Wed, 22 Jan 2003 01:40:39 -0500
From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.20 $
Subject: Bug#174589: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-5
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Randall Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 01:40:39 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xfree86, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

lbxproxy_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/lbxproxy_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libdps-dev_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps-dev_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libdps1-dbg_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps1-dbg_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libdps1_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps1_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libxaw6-dbg_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxaw6-dbg_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libxaw6-dev_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxaw6-dev_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libxaw6_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxaw6_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libxaw7-dbg_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxaw7-dbg_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libxaw7-dev_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxaw7-dev_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libxaw7_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/lib

Bug#167448: marked as done (libxaw7: A bug in Xaw/StripChart.c causes incorrect scale lines in xload window)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 22 Jan 2003 01:40:38 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#167448: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Nov 2002 14:56:47 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 02 08:56:47 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from svc980757.ll.zenon.net (mail.dubki.ru) [213.189.195.158] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 187zhe-0001B4-00; Sat, 02 Nov 2002 08:56:46 -0600
Received: by mail.dubki.ru (Postfix, from userid 1708)
id 075A31164061; Sat,  2 Nov 2002 17:56:45 +0300 (MSK)
Received: from sercond (sercond.dubki.ru [172.16.4.21])
by mail.dubki.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF0B2116405D
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat,  2 Nov 2002 17:56:44 +0300 (MSK)
Received: from nikita by sercond with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 187zi5-0007tY-00; Sat, 02 Nov 2002 17:57:13 +0300
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: "Nikita V. Youshchenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libxaw7: A bug in Xaw/StripChart.c causes incorrect scale lines in
xload window
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.9
Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2002 17:57:13 +0300
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0
tests=PATCH_UNIFIED_DIFF,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: libxaw7
Version: 4.2.1-3
Severity: normal
Tags: patch

Recently I tried to run xload on a high loaded server (load was more
than 10), and discovered that if window size is rather small, scale
lines are drawn incorrectly (upper than needed).

This is caused by a bug in Xaw/StripChart.c.
It draws lines with fixed integer steps. Than means that if window
height is 39 pixels, and 10 lines should be drawn to split view into 11
equal parts, lines will be drawn at 3, 6, 9, ,.., 30. So the bottom part
height will be 9 pixels while other parts height will be 2 pixels.

A patch to fix this is below. When applied, it makes part heights differ
no more than by 1 pixel.

Screenshots are at http://zigzag.lvk.cs.msu.su/~nikita/xload.png.
The top window is xload linked against patched libXaw, the bottom window
is xload linked against original libXaw.

--- StripChart.c.orig   Fri Dec 14 22:54:44 2001
+++ StripChart.cSat Nov  2 17:26:15 2002
@@ -375,7 +375,7 @@
 static int
 repaint_window(StripChartWidget w, int left, int width)
 {
-int i, j;
+int i, j, k;
 int next = w->strip_chart.interval;
 int scale = w->strip_chart.scale;
 int scalewidth = 0;
@@ -420,8 +420,10 @@
}

/* Draw graph reference lines */
+   k = XtHeight(w) % w->strip_chart.scale;
for (i = 1; i < w->strip_chart.scale; i++) {
-   j = i * ((int)XtHeight(w) / w->strip_chart.scale);
+   j = i * (XtHeight(w) / w->strip_chart.scale) +
+   ((i * k + w->strip_chart.scale/2) /
w->strip_chart.scale);
XDrawLine(dpy, win, w->strip_chart.hiGC, left, j,
scalewidth, j);
}
 }
@@ -443,7 +445,7 @@
 MoveChart(StripChartWidget w, Bool blit)
 {
 double old_max;
-int left, i, j;
+int left, i, j, k;
 int next = w->strip_chart.interval;

 if (!XtIsRealized((Widget)w))
@@ -492,8 +494,10 @@

 /* Draw graph reference lines */
 left = j;
+k = XtHeight(w) % w->strip_chart.scale;
 for (i = 1; i < w->strip_chart.scale; i++) {
-   j = i * (XtHeight(w) / w->strip_chart.scale);
+   j = i * (XtHeight(w) / w->strip_chart.scale) +
+   ((i * k + w->strip_chart.scale/2) / w->strip_chart.scale);
XDrawLine(XtDisplay((Widget)w), XtWindow((Widget)w),
  w->strip_chart.hiGC, left, j, XtWidth(w), j);
 }
@@ -554,7 +558,7 @@
 StripChartWidget w = (StripChartWidget)widget;
 XPoint *points;
 Cardinal size;
-int i;
+int i, k;

 if (w->strip_chart.scale <= 1) {
XtFree((char *)w->strip_chart.points);
@@ -569,8 +573,12 @@

 /* Draw graph reference lines into clip mask */

+k = XtHeight(w) % w->strip_chart.scale;
 for (i = 1; i < w->strip_chart.scale; i++) {
points[i - 1].x = 0;
-   points[i - 1].y = XtHeight(w) / w->strip_chart.scale;
+   points[i - 1].y = i * (XtHeight(w) / w->strip_chart.scale) +
+   ((i * k + w->strip_chart.scale/2) / w->strip_chart.scale);
 }

Bug#170678: marked as done (xprt: living with xprint-xprintorg)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 22 Jan 2003 01:40:38 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#170678: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Nov 2002 14:26:39 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 25 08:26:39 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 039.b.007.syd.iprimus.net.au (strider) [210.50.177.39] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18GKC5-Ar-00; Mon, 25 Nov 2002 08:26:38 -0600
Received: from drew by strider with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 18GKBz-0003oH-00; Tue, 26 Nov 2002 01:26:31 +1100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Drew Parsons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: xprt: living with xprint-xprintorg
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.9
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 01:26:30 +1100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Drew Parsons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0
tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: xprt
Version: 4.2.1-3
Severity: important
Tags: patch

Hi Branden,

as you know, I've now added xprint-xprintorg to the archives.  There's a
couple of trivial changes worth making to xprt to fit in with my new
package.  I've marked this bug report as "important", in line with bugs
#18061/#86881 (also marked as important), since xprt won't even pretend to
work without the config files provided by xprt-common.  But since xprt
(XFree86's Xprt) doesn't work anyway in practice (with the config files it
starts but doesn't print), feel free to downgrade the severity. 

xprint-xprintorg provides two binary packages:
xprt-common:config files and init script
xprt-xprintorg: server binary (Xprt).

I therefore recommend two changes to the xprt package:
1) update the description to point out that xprt does not work, and
xprt-xprintorg should be used instead. (should xprt recommend xprt-xprintorg?)
2) depend on xprt-common

I recommend against a third change:
3) let xprt conflict with xprt-xprintorg.

With respect to this latter point, I've arranged xprt-xprintorg to install
Xprt into /usr/bin, while xprt puts it in /usr/X11R6/bin/Xprt, so there is
no strict need for the two packages to conflict.  The init script
/etc/init.d/xprint provided by xprt-common uses /usr/bin/Xprt
(xprt-xprintorg) if installed, otherwise it invokes /usr/X11R6/bin/Xprt
(xprt).  For the record, Roland Mainz, the xprint.org upstream author, would
prefer the two to conflict, but I would prefer to override him on account of
freedom: if someone really wants to install xprt, even though it doesn't
work, then good luck to them.  Maybe they just want to have a glimpse to see
what's wrong with it.  Debian shouldn't prevent them from doing that.


Thus, I would recommend the xprt section of xfree86's control file to look
something like: 
###
Package: xprt 
Architecture: any 
Depends: xprt-common, ${shlibs:Depends} 
Description: X print server (XFree86)
 xprt provides an X server with the print extension and special DDX 
 (Device-Dependent X) implementation.
 .
 This package provides Xprt, the Xprint server from XFree86. Note that this
 version is buggy and does not work with mozilla. You should install
 xprt-xprintorg instead, which provides full support for printing from
 mozilla, including non-latin characters and MathML.

###

I'll leave it to you to decide if xprt should Recommends: xprt-xprintorg.

Note that the provision of xprt-common also permits bugs #18061/#86881 to
be closed.

Enjoy :)

Drew

p.s. with regards to bugs #21440/#31399, I'm planning to make some man pages
for xprint.org soon.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux strider 2.4.19 #1 Sun Aug 18 11:36:53 EST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=ru_RU, LC_CTYPE=ru_RU


---
Received: (at 170678-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Jan 2003 06:54:05 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 22 00:54:04 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18bElw-0002gy-00; Wed, 22 Jan 2003 00:54:04 -0600
Received: from rdonald by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
i

Bug#170509: marked as done (xfree86: FTBFS on sparc: Type6 keyboard support patch to xf86Events.c appears to be junk)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 22 Jan 2003 01:40:38 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#170509: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Nov 2002 09:59:22 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 24 03:59:22 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from pcp942041pcs.cstltn01.in.comcast.net (apocalypse.deadbeast.net) 
[68.57.244.226] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18FtXt-0001HG-00; Sun, 24 Nov 2002 03:59:21 -0600
Received: by apocalypse.deadbeast.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 232323D6B; Sun, 24 Nov 2002 04:58:51 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: xfree86: FTBFS on sparc: Type6 keyboard support patch to xf86Events.c
 appears to be junk
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.9
Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 04:58:51 -0500
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=5.0
tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,SUPERLONG_LINE,UPPERCASE_25_50
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: xfree86
Version: 4.2.1-4
Severity: serious

gcc -c -g -O2 -ansi -pedantic -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wstrict-prototypes 
-Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs 
-Wundef-I. -I../../../../../programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support 
-I../../../../../programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/bus 
-I../../../../../programs/Xserver/mfb 
-I../../../../../programs/Xserver/mi -I../../../../../programs/Xserver/include 
-I../../../../../programs/Xserver/os 
-I../../../../../exports/include/X11 -I../../../../../programs/Xserver/Xext 
-I../../../../../include/extensions 
-I../../../../../programs/Xserver/Xi 
-I../../../../../programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/ddc 
-I../../../../../programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/i2c  
-I../../../../../lib/font/include -I../../../../../include/fonts
-I../../../../../programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86 
-I../../../../../programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/parser
-I../../../../../programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/loader 
-I../../../../../programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/vgahw 
-I../../../../../programs/Xser
 ver/hw/xfree86/rac 
-I../../../../../programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/scanpci 
-I../../../../../programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/vbe 
-I../../../../../programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/int10 
-I../../../../../programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/ddc  -I../../../../.. 
-I../../../../../exports/include   -Dlinux -D__sparc__ 
-D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=199309L -D_POSIX_SOURCE -D_XOPEN_SOURCE -D_BSD_SOURCE 
-D_SVID_SOURCE  -D_GNU_SOURCE  -DSHAPE -DXINPUT -DXKB -DLBX -DXAPPGROUP 
-DXCSECURITY -DTOGCUP  -DXF86BIGFONT -DDPMSExtension  -DPIXPRIV -DPANORAMIX  
-DRENDER  -DHAVE_DOMAINS -DGCCUSESGAS -DAVOID_GLYPHBLT -DPIXPRIV -DSINGLEDEPTH 
-DXFreeXDGA -DXvExtension -DXFree86LOADER  -DXFree86Server -DXF86VIDMODE 
-DXvMCExtension  -DSMART_SCHEDULE -DBUILDDEBUG -DX_BYTE_ORDER=X_BIG_ENDIAN 
-DNDEBUG  -DFUNCPROTO=15 -DNARROWPROTO -DMITMISC -DXTEST -DXTRAP -DXSYNC 
-DXCMISC -DXRECORD  -DMITSHM  -DBIGREQS -DXF86VIDMODE -DXF86MISC -DDBE 
-DDPMSExtension -DEVI -DSCREENSAVER -DXV -DXVMC -DGLXEXT -DXF86DRI -DGLX_DIRE
 CT_RENDERING -DGLX_USE_DLOPEN -DGLX_USE_MESA -D__GLX_ALIGN64 -DFONTCACHE 
-DDDXOSINIT -DSERVER_LOCK -DDDXOSFATALERROR -DDDXOSVERRORF -DDDXTIME -DPART_NET 
 -DMITMISC -DXTEST -DXTRAP -DXSYNC -DXCMISC -DXRECORD  -DMITSHM  -DBIGREQS 
-DXF86VIDMODE -DXF86MISC -DDBE -DDPMSExtension -DEVI -DSCREENSAVER -DXV -DXVMC 
-DGLXEXT -DXF86DRI -DGLX_DIRECT_RENDERING -DGLX_USE_DLOPEN -DGLX_USE_MESA 
-D__GLX_ALIGN64 -DFONTCACHE xf86Events.c
In file included from ../../../../../exports/include/X11/Xos.h:154,
 from 
../../../../../programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/xf86_OSlib.h:79,
 from xf86Events.c:37:
/usr/include/unistd.h:966: warning: redundant redeclaration of `ctermid' in 
same scope
/usr/include/stdio.h:625: warning: previous declaration of `ctermid'
In file included from 
../../../../../programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/xf86_OSlib.h:747,
 from xf86Events.c:37:
../../../../../programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/xf86_OSproc.h:259: 
warning: redundant redeclaration of `xf86MakeNewMapping' in same scope
../../../../../programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86

Bug#175996: Xinerama for GNOME 2

[Xavier Bestel]

I just want to chime in: since Xinerama support has been disabled in
gtk2, my desktop is near unusable. I have one screen smaller then the
other, so there's a "dead area" in which panel menus and windows may be
lost, and there's no way (I know of) to access them.

So yes, I *desesperately* need Xinerama.

Xav

Bug#171294: marked as done (xserver-xfree86: [core server] enabling pointer keys causes server to beep until killed)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 22 Jan 2003 01:40:39 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#171294: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Nov 2002 22:12:14 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 30 16:12:12 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from kallisti.hemmet.chalmers.se [193.11.248.85] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18IFqM-0002a7-00; Sat, 30 Nov 2002 16:12:10 -0600
Received: from weinholt by kallisti.hemmet.chalmers.se with local (Exim 3.36 #1 
(Debian))
id 18IFqA-0004cF-00; Sat, 30 Nov 2002 23:11:58 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: =?iso-8859-1?q?G=F6ran_Weinholt?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: xserver-xfree86: shift-num lock makes X beep alot
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.9
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 23:11:58 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: =?iso-8859-1?Q?G=F6ran_Weinholt?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0
tests=BALANCE_FOR_LONG_20K,MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: *

Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.2.1-4
Severity: normal

When I press shift-num lock to active the mouse stuff on the
numerical keyboard, X starts to beep. It keeps on beeping until
I kill the server...

It's very annoying.

-- Package-specific info:
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation NV11 [GeForce2 MX] (rev 
b2)
01:00.0 Class 0300: 10de:0110 (rev b2)

# XF86Config-4 (XFree86 server configuration file) generated by Dexconf, the
# Debian X Configuration tool, using values from the debconf database.
#
# Edit this file with caution, and see the XF86Config manual page.
# (Type "man XF86Config" at the shell prompt.)

Section "Files"
FontPath"unix/:7100"# local font server
# if the local font server has problems, we can fall back on these
#FontPath   "/usr/lib/X11/fonts/misc"
#FontPath   "/usr/lib/X11/fonts/cyrillic"
#FontPath   "/usr/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/:unscaled"
#FontPath   "/usr/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/:unscaled"
#FontPath   "/usr/lib/X11/fonts/Type1"
#FontPath   "/usr/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo"
#FontPath   "/usr/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi"
#FontPath   "/usr/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi"
EndSection

Section "ServerFlags"
EndSection

Section "Module"
Load"ddc"
Load"GLcore"
Load"dbe"
Load"dri"
Load"extmod"
#   Load"glx"
Load"v4l"
Load"pex5"
Load"record"
Load"xie"
Load"bitmap"
Load"freetype"
Load"speedo"
Load"type1"
Load"vbe"
Load"int10"
EndSection

Section "InputDevice"
Identifier  "Generic Keyboard"
Driver  "keyboard"
Option  "CoreKeyboard"
Option  "XkbRules"  "xfree86"
#   Option  "XkbModel"  "pc105"
Option  "XkbModel"  "logicordless"
Option  "XkbLayout" "se"
EndSection

Section "InputDevice"
Identifier  "Configured Mouse"
Driver  "mouse"
Option  "CorePointer"
Option  "Device""/dev/psaux"
Option  "Protocol"  "ImPS/2"
Option  "Emulate3Buttons"   "false"
Option  "ZAxisMapping"  "4 5"
EndSection

Section "InputDevice"
Identifier  "Generic Mouse"
Driver  "mouse"
Option  "SendCoreEvents""true"
Option  "Device""/dev/input/mice"
Option  "Protocol"  "ImPS/2"
Option  "Emulate3Buttons"   "true"
Option  "ZAxisMapping"  "4 5"
EndSection

Section "Device"
Identifier  "Generic Video Card"
Driver  "nv"
#   Option  "UseFBDev"  "true"
#   Option  "backingstore"  "true"
EndSection

Section "Monitor"
Identifier  "Generic Monitor"
#   HorizSync 31.5 - 37.9
#   VertRefresh 50-90
HorizSync 31 - 70
VertRefresh 55-120

Option

Bug#166234: marked as done (xserver-xfree86: [i810] Xv windows show only chromakey (regression from 4.1.0) on i810-dc100 rev 2)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 22 Jan 2003 01:40:37 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#166234: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Oct 2002 20:17:44 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 24 15:17:42 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from hd5e2621a.gavlegardarna.gavle.to (spikboll) [213.226.98.26] 
(postfix)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 184oQ2-0002kw-00; Thu, 24 Oct 2002 15:17:26 -0500
Received: by spikboll (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id B90A0CBBE5; Thu, 24 Oct 2002 22:17:23 +0200 (CEST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Mattias Ostergren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: xserver-xfree86: [i810] Xv doesn't work with i810 in X 4.2.1
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.8
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 22:17:22 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0
tests=BALANCE_FOR_LONG_20K,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.2.1-3
Severity: normal
Tags: sid

Xv doesn't work with i810 in X 4.2.1 (it worked with X 4.1.x).
When trying to play movies with xine or mplayer using Xv as output the movie
window only contains the keycolor that Xv should overlay.

xvinfo output:

X-Video Extension version 2.2
screen #0
  Adaptor #0: "I810 Video Overlay"
number of ports: 1
port base: 55
operations supported: PutImage =

supported visuals:
  depth 16, visualID 0x23
  depth 16, visualID 0x24
number of attributes: 3
  "XV_COLORKEY" (range 0 to 16777215)
  client settable attribute
  client gettable attribute (current value is 2110)
  "XV_BRIGHTNESS" (range -128 to 127)
  client settable attribute
  client gettable attribute (current value is 0)
  "XV_CONTRAST" (range 0 to 255)
  client settable attribute
  client gettable attribute (current value is 64)
maximum XvImage size: 1440 x 1080
Number of image formats: 4
  id: 0x32595559 (YUY2)
guid: 59555932--0010-8000-00aa00389b71
bits per pixel: 16
number of planes: 1
type: YUV (packed)
  id: 0x32315659 (YV12)
guid: 59563132--0010-8000-00aa00389b71
bits per pixel: 12
number of planes: 3
type: YUV (planar)
  id: 0x30323449 (I420)
guid: 49343230--0010-8000-00aa00389b71
bits per pixel: 12
number of planes: 3
type: YUV (planar)
  id: 0x59565955 (UYVY)
guid: 55595659--0010-8000-00aa00389b71
bits per pixel: 16
number of planes: 1
type: YUV (packed)


-- Package-specific info:
00:01.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corp. 82810 DC-100 CGC [Chipset Gr=
aphics Controller] (rev 02)
00:01.0 Class 0300: 8086:7123 (rev 02)


Section "Files"
FontPath "/var/lib/defoma/x-ttcidfont-conf.d/dirs/CID"
FontPath "/var/lib/defoma/x-ttcidfont-conf.d/dirs/TrueType"
#FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/TrueType"
FontPath "/usr/local/share/fonts/ttfonts"
FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/truetype/openoffice"
FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc:unscaled"
FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi:unscaled"
FontPath"/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi"
FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/Type1"
FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo"
FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi"
EndSection

### BEGIN DEBCONF SECTION
# XF86Config-4 (XFree86 server configuration file) generated by dexconf, the
# Debian X Configuration tool, using values from the debconf database.
#
# Edit this file with caution, and see the XF86Config-4 manual page.
# (Type "man XF86Config-4" at the shell prompt.)
#
# If you want your changes to this file preserved by dexconf, only make cha=
nges
# before the "### BEGIN DEBCONF SECTION" line above, and/or after the
# "### END DEBCONF SECTION" line below.
#
# To change things within the debconf section, run the command:
#   dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xfree86
# as root.  Also see "How do I add custom sections to a dexconf-generated
# XF86Config or XF86Config-4 file?" in /usr/share/doc/xfree86-common/FAQ.gz.

Section "Module"
Load"GLcore"

Bug#177867: X Server Crash

[Frank Mulder]

Package: x-window-system
Version: ?
Severity: normal

The log file is attached.

I have a fresh installation of Debian (3.0), and I typed 'startx', but
the server crashed as you can see in the log file. (First the screen
flickered and then it returned to the command line). It says that I don't
have enough memory, but that shouldn't be right, because I have 112 MB
RAM and almost 200 MB swap. Maybe you can tell me how to check how much
RAM I have (well, how much ram debian says I have). Another problem can
be that I have selected vga for video card, while I have an S3 compatible
card. How to change this? Actually I don't expect this is the main
problem, but you'll know this better than I.

Thanks for your help.

Frank

-- 
http://fastmail.fm - Same, same, but different...


XFree86.0.log
Description: application/unknown

Bug#175996: Xinerama -- Patches in libgtk2

[Koenraad Heijlen]

Same here, it's weird libgtk2 uses patches to work around a packaging
bug.

Hope you guys can fix it.

_or_

Could you point me to a working pre Xfree 4.3 package.

I've been using http://hanzubon.org/ packages, but that site is login
protected atm *bummer* (http://hanzubon.org/Linux/Debian/HANZUBON/).

regards, koenraad.

Re: XFree86 4.2.1-4pre5v1 (source,powerpc) at the X Strike Force

[Drew Parsons]

On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 01:00:58PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 18, 2003 at 02:54:49AM +1100, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > For what it's worth, "in the future" sounds right to me, 
> >  ^^^
> > sounds better to my ear than "...future release..." :)
> 
> But does it sound better than "in future", e.g., "In future, the
> Americans should try harder not to let a kumquat assume the office of
> President."?
> 
> If it does to you, then maybe what I'm thinking of is a U.K. thing.
> 

I think I see them as different usages.  Your "In future" phrase is
positioned as a supplementary clause, so grammatically it could be omitted
in way that wouldn't work with the "in the future" at the end of the
sentence.  I don't know if this is technically true in a grammatical sense,
but it's how I "feel" the correctness.

What I mean is, I feel the following sentences are both OK:

"In future, you should do this."
"I will do this in the future."

whereas these feel wrong:

"In the future, you should do this."
"I will do this in future."

Actually, no, now I've talked it through, I think I see what the rule is.
It's the difference between the future as an abstract concept, and a
specific (though unknown) point in time which happens to occur later than
the current point in time.  Grammatically, this is the difference between
"imperfect" and "perfect" verbs, which is important in day-to-day usage
of Russian verbs, among other things.  It's the difference between "I was
doing it (but never finished doing it)" and "I did it (and finished doing it)".

"in future" means you're talking about something that will (or should)
generally be done, without claiming it to have actually been done at any
particular point of time.

"in the future" means it will have been done at some particular point in time.

In the case of XFree86's Xprt server eventually working, we can say that
there will be a specific release made at some particular point in time, and
therefore I believe "in the future" is correct.

That's I explain my choice of phrase, anyway :)

Drew

-- 
PGP public key available at http://people.debian.org/~dparsons/drewskey.txt
Fingerprint: A110 EAE1 D7D2 8076 5FE0  EC0A B6CE 7041 6412 4E4A


pgpaeDRCRoAfl.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: Bug#170678: marked as done (xprt: living with xprint-xprintorg)

[Drew Parsons]

On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 01:03:32AM -0600, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
...
>  - add dependency on xprt-common to xprt, and update its extended
>description to describe its broken state and available alternative
>(thanks, Drew Parsons) (Closes: #170678)

Don't forget that (in my opinion) this also allows #18061 and #86881 to be
closed.

With regards to #21440 and #31399, I've filed some man pages upstream
(bugzilla at xprint.mozdev.org).  Let me know if you want them.  We'd have
to think about how to handle a man page simultaneously between xprt and
xprt-xprintorg.  Putting it into xprt-common would solve the conflict, of
course, but I'm not sure it's where we'd be supposed to put it.

Drew

-- 
PGP public key available at http://people.debian.org/~dparsons/drewskey.txt
Fingerprint: A110 EAE1 D7D2 8076 5FE0  EC0A B6CE 7041 6412 4E4A


pgpmwevI69IwJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Bug#177731: xserver-xfree86: DRI output garbled for i810 driver

[Colin Watson]

On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 05:08:30PM +0100, Lars Steinke wrote:
> Package: xserver-xfree86
> Version: 4.2.1-4
> Severity: important
> 
> Since upgrading to 4.2 the i810 3d acceleration produces quite unusable
> results, for instance glxgears is repeatedly copied across to whole
> screen width and looks sort of "interlaced" and squashed, i.e. every second 
> row is not displayed or at least misaligned horizontally. The same applies
> to full screen OpenGL apps like bzflag...

I've experienced the same problem on my i810 laptop. Let me know if
there's anything I can do to help debugging.

-- 
Colin Watson  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Section "Files"
FontPath"unix/:7100"# local font server
# if the local font server has problems, we can fall back on these
FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/misc"
FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/cyrillic"
FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/:unscaled"
FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/:unscaled"
FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/Type1"
FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo"
FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi"
FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi"
EndSection

### BEGIN DEBCONF SECTION
# XF86Config-4 (XFree86 server configuration file) generated by dexconf, the
# Debian X Configuration tool, using values from the debconf database.
#
# Edit this file with caution, and see the XF86Config-4 manual page.
# (Type "man XF86Config-4" at the shell prompt.)
#
# If you want your changes to this file preserved by dexconf, only make changes
# before the "### BEGIN DEBCONF SECTION" line above, and/or after the
# "### END DEBCONF SECTION" line below.
#
# To change things within the debconf section, run the command:
#   dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xfree86
# as root.  Also see "How do I add custom sections to a dexconf-generated
# XF86Config or XF86Config-4 file?" in /usr/share/doc/xfree86-common/FAQ.gz.

Section "Files"
FontPath"unix/:7100"# local font server
# if the local font server has problems, we can fall back on these
FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/misc"
FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/cyrillic"
FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/:unscaled"
FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/:unscaled"
FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/Type1"
FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo"
FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi"
FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi"
EndSection

Section "Module"
Load"GLcore"
Load"bitmap"
Load"dbe"
Load"ddc"
Load"dri"
Load"extmod"
Load"freetype"
Load"glx"
Load"int10"
Load"record"
Load"speedo"
Load"type1"
Load"vbe"
EndSection

Section "InputDevice"
Identifier  "Generic Keyboard"
Driver  "keyboard"
Option  "CoreKeyboard"
Option  "XkbRules"  "xfree86"
Option  "XkbModel"  "pc105"
Option  "XkbLayout" "gb"
EndSection

Section "InputDevice"
Identifier  "Configured Mouse"
Driver  "mouse"
Option  "CorePointer"
Option  "Device""/dev/psaux"
Option  "Protocol"  "ImPS/2"
Option  "ZAxisMapping"  "4 5"
EndSection

Section "InputDevice"
Identifier  "Generic Mouse"
Driver  "mouse"
Option  "SendCoreEvents""true"
Option  "Device""/dev/input/mice"
Option  "Protocol"  "ImPS/2"
Option  "ZAxisMapping"  "4 5"
EndSection

Section "Device"
Identifier  "Generic Video Card"
Driver  "i810"
VideoRam8192
EndSection

Section "Monitor"
Identifier  "Generic Monitor"
HorizSync   30-57
VertRefresh 43-72
Option  "DPMS"
EndSection

Section "Screen"
Identifier  "Default Screen"
Device  "Generic Video Card"
Monitor "Generic Monitor"
DefaultDepth16
SubSection "Display"
Depth   1
Modes   "1024x768" "800x600" "640x480"
EndSubSection
SubSection "Display"
Depth   4
Modes   "1024x768" "800x600" "640x480"
EndSubSection
SubSection "Display"
Depth   8
Modes   "1024x768" "800x600" "640x480"
EndSubSection
SubSection "Display"
Depth   15
Modes   "1024x768" "800x600" "640x480"
EndSubSection
SubSection "Di

Bug#177867: marked as done (X Server Crash)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 22 Jan 2003 10:46:05 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#177867: X Server Crash
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Jan 2003 11:01:57 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 22 05:01:57 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ny2.fastmail.fm (server2.fastmail.fm) [66.111.4.3] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18bIdo-0003rT-00; Wed, 22 Jan 2003 05:01:56 -0600
Received: from server2.fastmail.fm (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by fastmail.fm (Postfix) with ESMTP id A65A944778
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 22 Jan 2003 06:01:49 -0500 (EST)
Received: from 127.0.0.1 ([127.0.0.1] helo=server2.fastmail.fm) by fastmail.fm
  with SMTP; Wed, 22 Jan 2003 06:01:49 -0500
Received: by server2.fastmail.fm (Postfix, from userid 99)
id A0E8A4483D; Wed, 22 Jan 2003 06:01:49 -0500 (EST)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="_--=_1043233309166770"
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: "Frank Mulder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 12:01:49 +0100
X-Epoch: 1043233309
X-Sasl-enc: EVGah5/RsxcMjdB0nrdiBA
Subject: X Server Crash
X-Mailer: MIME::Lite 1.2  (F2.71; T1.001; A1.51; B2.12; Q2.03)
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0
tests=SIGNATURE_LONG_SPARSE,SPAM_PHRASE_02_03
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

--_--=_1043233309166770
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"

Package: x-window-system
Version: ?
Severity: normal

The log file is attached.

I have a fresh installation of Debian (3.0), and I typed 'startx', but
the server crashed as you can see in the log file. (First the screen
flickered and then it returned to the command line). It says that I don't
have enough memory, but that shouldn't be right, because I have 112 MB
RAM and almost 200 MB swap. Maybe you can tell me how to check how much
RAM I have (well, how much ram debian says I have). Another problem can
be that I have selected vga for video card, while I have an S3 compatible
card. How to change this? Actually I don't expect this is the main
problem, but you'll know this better than I.

Thanks for your help.

Frank

-- 
http://fastmail.fm - Same, same, but different...

--_--=_1043233309166770
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="XFree86.0.log"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Type: application/unknown; name="XFree86.0.log"
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Bug#172526: Forwarded the patch upstream

[Sebastian Rittau]

I just forwarded the patch to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 - Sebastian

Bug#174282: acknowledged by developer (Bug#174282: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-5)

[Kalle Olavi Niemitalo]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Debian Bug Tracking System) writes:

>* patch #203: fix for alignment issues in Xpm library on Alpha (thanks,
>  Kalle Olavi Niemitalo) (Closes: #174282)

Great!  Although it was a size issue, not an alignment issue.  ;-)

Re: Bug#177867: marked as done (X Server Crash)

[Daniel Stone]

On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 09:48:14AM -0600, Branden Robinson scrawled:
> Try changing the driver you use to "s3", though I don't recall off the
> top of my head how well the old S3 Trio chips are supported by the
> version of XFree86 4.x in woody (Debian 3.0).

They're not.

-- 
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Trinity College, University of Melbourne


pgpqBIivVc5Og.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Bug#177867: marked as done (X Server Crash)

[Branden Robinson]

On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 07:52:03AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 09:48:14AM -0600, Branden Robinson scrawled:
> > Try changing the driver you use to "s3", though I don't recall off the
> > top of my head how well the old S3 Trio chips are supported by the
> > version of XFree86 4.x in woody (Debian 3.0).
> 
> They're not.

In that case I suggest trying the "vesa" driver, or upgrading to Debian
"testing", which contains XFree86 4.2.1, which contains support for
several varities of Trio64 chips.

http://www.xfree86.org/4.2.1/Status28.html#28

Alternatively, you can continue to use the xserver-s3 or xserver-svga
packages from XFree86 3.3.6 (whichever works better for you), which are
still available for the i386 architecture.

-- 
G. Branden Robinson| No math genius, eh?  Then perhaps
Debian GNU/Linux   | you could explain to me where you
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | got these...   PENROSE TILES!
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Stephen R. Notley


pgpuxpy8ruodl.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Bug#177867: marked as done (X Server Crash)

[Daniel Stone]

On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 09:42:09PM -0500, Branden Robinson scrawled:
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 07:52:03AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 09:48:14AM -0600, Branden Robinson scrawled:
> > > Try changing the driver you use to "s3", though I don't recall off the
> > > top of my head how well the old S3 Trio chips are supported by the
> > > version of XFree86 4.x in woody (Debian 3.0).
> > 
> > They're not.
> 
> In that case I suggest trying the "vesa" driver, or upgrading to Debian
> "testing", which contains XFree86 4.2.1, which contains support for
> several varities of Trio64 chips.
> 
> http://www.xfree86.org/4.2.1/Status28.html#28
> 
> Alternatively, you can continue to use the xserver-s3 or xserver-svga
> packages from XFree86 3.3.6 (whichever works better for you), which are
> still available for the i386 architecture.

I just made do with using i386. I've now given my Diamond Stealth64
Video, cool as it was, away, because I have an AGP Radeon 9000. I'm
planning to start using a.out soon, and my sundial's due any week now!

:) d

-- 
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Trinity College, University of Melbourne


pgpT7eRc6H5Ds.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Bug#177867: X Server Crash

[Frank Mulder]

Package: x-window-system
Version: ?
Severity: normal

The log file is attached.

I have a fresh installation of Debian (3.0), and I typed 'startx', but
the server crashed as you can see in the log file. (First the screen
flickered and then it returned to the command line). It says that I don't
have enough memory, but that shouldn't be right, because I have 112 MB
RAM and almost 200 MB swap. Maybe you can tell me how to check how much
RAM I have (well, how much ram debian says I have). Another problem can
be that I have selected vga for video card, while I have an S3 compatible
card. How to change this? Actually I don't expect this is the main
problem, but you'll know this better than I.

Thanks for your help.

Frank

-- 
http://fastmail.fm - Same, same, but different...



XFree86.0.log
Description: application/unknown

Bug#175996: Xinerama -- Patches in libgtk2

[Koenraad Heijlen]

Same here, it's weird libgtk2 uses patches to work around a packaging
bug.

Hope you guys can fix it.

_or_

Could you point me to a working pre Xfree 4.3 package.

I've been using http://hanzubon.org/ packages, but that site is login
protected atm *bummer* (http://hanzubon.org/Linux/Debian/HANZUBON/).

regards, koenraad.



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: XFree86 4.2.1-4pre5v1 (source,powerpc) at the X Strike Force

[Drew Parsons]

On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 01:00:58PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 18, 2003 at 02:54:49AM +1100, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > For what it's worth, "in the future" sounds right to me, 
> >  ^^^
> > sounds better to my ear than "...future release..." :)
> 
> But does it sound better than "in future", e.g., "In future, the
> Americans should try harder not to let a kumquat assume the office of
> President."?
> 
> If it does to you, then maybe what I'm thinking of is a U.K. thing.
> 

I think I see them as different usages.  Your "In future" phrase is
positioned as a supplementary clause, so grammatically it could be omitted
in way that wouldn't work with the "in the future" at the end of the
sentence.  I don't know if this is technically true in a grammatical sense,
but it's how I "feel" the correctness.

What I mean is, I feel the following sentences are both OK:

"In future, you should do this."
"I will do this in the future."

whereas these feel wrong:

"In the future, you should do this."
"I will do this in future."

Actually, no, now I've talked it through, I think I see what the rule is.
It's the difference between the future as an abstract concept, and a
specific (though unknown) point in time which happens to occur later than
the current point in time.  Grammatically, this is the difference between
"imperfect" and "perfect" verbs, which is important in day-to-day usage
of Russian verbs, among other things.  It's the difference between "I was
doing it (but never finished doing it)" and "I did it (and finished doing it)".

"in future" means you're talking about something that will (or should)
generally be done, without claiming it to have actually been done at any
particular point of time.

"in the future" means it will have been done at some particular point in time.

In the case of XFree86's Xprt server eventually working, we can say that
there will be a specific release made at some particular point in time, and
therefore I believe "in the future" is correct.

That's I explain my choice of phrase, anyway :)

Drew

-- 
PGP public key available at http://people.debian.org/~dparsons/drewskey.txt
Fingerprint: A110 EAE1 D7D2 8076 5FE0  EC0A B6CE 7041 6412 4E4A



msg05426/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: Bug#170678: marked as done (xprt: living with xprint-xprintorg)

[Drew Parsons]

On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 01:03:32AM -0600, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
...
>  - add dependency on xprt-common to xprt, and update its extended
>description to describe its broken state and available alternative
>(thanks, Drew Parsons) (Closes: #170678)

Don't forget that (in my opinion) this also allows #18061 and #86881 to be
closed.

With regards to #21440 and #31399, I've filed some man pages upstream
(bugzilla at xprint.mozdev.org).  Let me know if you want them.  We'd have
to think about how to handle a man page simultaneously between xprt and
xprt-xprintorg.  Putting it into xprt-common would solve the conflict, of
course, but I'm not sure it's where we'd be supposed to put it.

Drew

-- 
PGP public key available at http://people.debian.org/~dparsons/drewskey.txt
Fingerprint: A110 EAE1 D7D2 8076 5FE0  EC0A B6CE 7041 6412 4E4A



msg05427/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Bug#177731: xserver-xfree86: DRI output garbled for i810 driver

[Colin Watson]

On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 05:08:30PM +0100, Lars Steinke wrote:
> Package: xserver-xfree86
> Version: 4.2.1-4
> Severity: important
> 
> Since upgrading to 4.2 the i810 3d acceleration produces quite unusable
> results, for instance glxgears is repeatedly copied across to whole
> screen width and looks sort of "interlaced" and squashed, i.e. every second 
> row is not displayed or at least misaligned horizontally. The same applies
> to full screen OpenGL apps like bzflag...

I've experienced the same problem on my i810 laptop. Let me know if
there's anything I can do to help debugging.

-- 
Colin Watson  [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

Section "Files"
FontPath"unix/:7100"# local font server
# if the local font server has problems, we can fall back on these
FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/misc"
FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/cyrillic"
FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/:unscaled"
FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/:unscaled"
FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/Type1"
FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo"
FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi"
FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi"
EndSection

### BEGIN DEBCONF SECTION
# XF86Config-4 (XFree86 server configuration file) generated by dexconf, the
# Debian X Configuration tool, using values from the debconf database.
#
# Edit this file with caution, and see the XF86Config-4 manual page.
# (Type "man XF86Config-4" at the shell prompt.)
#
# If you want your changes to this file preserved by dexconf, only make changes
# before the "### BEGIN DEBCONF SECTION" line above, and/or after the
# "### END DEBCONF SECTION" line below.
#
# To change things within the debconf section, run the command:
#   dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xfree86
# as root.  Also see "How do I add custom sections to a dexconf-generated
# XF86Config or XF86Config-4 file?" in /usr/share/doc/xfree86-common/FAQ.gz.

Section "Files"
FontPath"unix/:7100"# local font server
# if the local font server has problems, we can fall back on these
FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/misc"
FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/cyrillic"
FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/:unscaled"
FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/:unscaled"
FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/Type1"
FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo"
FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi"
FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi"
EndSection

Section "Module"
Load"GLcore"
Load"bitmap"
Load"dbe"
Load"ddc"
Load"dri"
Load"extmod"
Load"freetype"
Load"glx"
Load"int10"
Load"record"
Load"speedo"
Load"type1"
Load"vbe"
EndSection

Section "InputDevice"
Identifier  "Generic Keyboard"
Driver  "keyboard"
Option  "CoreKeyboard"
Option  "XkbRules"  "xfree86"
Option  "XkbModel"  "pc105"
Option  "XkbLayout" "gb"
EndSection

Section "InputDevice"
Identifier  "Configured Mouse"
Driver  "mouse"
Option  "CorePointer"
Option  "Device""/dev/psaux"
Option  "Protocol"  "ImPS/2"
Option  "ZAxisMapping"  "4 5"
EndSection

Section "InputDevice"
Identifier  "Generic Mouse"
Driver  "mouse"
Option  "SendCoreEvents""true"
Option  "Device""/dev/input/mice"
Option  "Protocol"  "ImPS/2"
Option  "ZAxisMapping"  "4 5"
EndSection

Section "Device"
Identifier  "Generic Video Card"
Driver  "i810"
VideoRam8192
EndSection

Section "Monitor"
Identifier  "Generic Monitor"
HorizSync   30-57
VertRefresh 43-72
Option  "DPMS"
EndSection

Section "Screen"
Identifier  "Default Screen"
Device  "Generic Video Card"
Monitor "Generic Monitor"
DefaultDepth16
SubSection "Display"
Depth   1
Modes   "1024x768" "800x600" "640x480"
EndSubSection
SubSection "Display"
Depth   4
Modes   "1024x768" "800x600" "640x480"
EndSubSection
SubSection "Display"
Depth   8
Modes   "1024x768" "800x600" "640x480"
EndSubSection
SubSection "Display"
Depth   15
Modes   "1024x768" "800x600" "640x480"
EndSubSection
SubSection 

Bug#177867: marked as done (X Server Crash)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 22 Jan 2003 10:46:05 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#177867: X Server Crash
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Jan 2003 11:01:57 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 22 05:01:57 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ny2.fastmail.fm (server2.fastmail.fm) [66.111.4.3] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18bIdo-0003rT-00; Wed, 22 Jan 2003 05:01:56 -0600
Received: from server2.fastmail.fm (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by fastmail.fm (Postfix) with ESMTP id A65A944778
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 22 Jan 2003 06:01:49 -0500 (EST)
Received: from 127.0.0.1 ([127.0.0.1] helo=server2.fastmail.fm) by fastmail.fm
  with SMTP; Wed, 22 Jan 2003 06:01:49 -0500
Received: by server2.fastmail.fm (Postfix, from userid 99)
id A0E8A4483D; Wed, 22 Jan 2003 06:01:49 -0500 (EST)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="_--=_1043233309166770"
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: "Frank Mulder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 12:01:49 +0100
X-Epoch: 1043233309
X-Sasl-enc: EVGah5/RsxcMjdB0nrdiBA
Subject: X Server Crash
X-Mailer: MIME::Lite 1.2  (F2.71; T1.001; A1.51; B2.12; Q2.03)
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0
tests=SIGNATURE_LONG_SPARSE,SPAM_PHRASE_02_03
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

--_--=_1043233309166770
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"

Package: x-window-system
Version: ?
Severity: normal

The log file is attached.

I have a fresh installation of Debian (3.0), and I typed 'startx', but
the server crashed as you can see in the log file. (First the screen
flickered and then it returned to the command line). It says that I don't
have enough memory, but that shouldn't be right, because I have 112 MB
RAM and almost 200 MB swap. Maybe you can tell me how to check how much
RAM I have (well, how much ram debian says I have). Another problem can
be that I have selected vga for video card, while I have an S3 compatible
card. How to change this? Actually I don't expect this is the main
problem, but you'll know this better than I.

Thanks for your help.

Frank

-- 
http://fastmail.fm - Same, same, but different...

--_--=_1043233309166770
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="XFree86.0.log"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Type: application/unknown; name="XFree86.0.log"
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Bug#172526: Forwarded the patch upstream

[Sebastian Rittau]

I just forwarded the patch to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 - Sebastian



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#174282: acknowledged by developer (Bug#174282: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-5)

[Kalle Olavi Niemitalo]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Debian Bug Tracking System) writes:

>* patch #203: fix for alignment issues in Xpm library on Alpha (thanks,
>  Kalle Olavi Niemitalo) (Closes: #174282)

Great!  Although it was a size issue, not an alignment issue.  ;-)



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Bug#177867: marked as done (X Server Crash)

[Daniel Stone]

On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 09:48:14AM -0600, Branden Robinson scrawled:
> Try changing the driver you use to "s3", though I don't recall off the
> top of my head how well the old S3 Trio chips are supported by the
> version of XFree86 4.x in woody (Debian 3.0).

They're not.

-- 
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Trinity College, University of Melbourne



msg05432/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Bug#177867: marked as done (X Server Crash)

[Branden Robinson]

On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 07:52:03AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 09:48:14AM -0600, Branden Robinson scrawled:
> > Try changing the driver you use to "s3", though I don't recall off the
> > top of my head how well the old S3 Trio chips are supported by the
> > version of XFree86 4.x in woody (Debian 3.0).
> 
> They're not.

In that case I suggest trying the "vesa" driver, or upgrading to Debian
"testing", which contains XFree86 4.2.1, which contains support for
several varities of Trio64 chips.

http://www.xfree86.org/4.2.1/Status28.html#28

Alternatively, you can continue to use the xserver-s3 or xserver-svga
packages from XFree86 3.3.6 (whichever works better for you), which are
still available for the i386 architecture.

-- 
G. Branden Robinson| No math genius, eh?  Then perhaps
Debian GNU/Linux   | you could explain to me where you
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | got these...   PENROSE TILES!
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Stephen R. Notley



msg05433/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Bug#177867: marked as done (X Server Crash)

[Daniel Stone]

On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 09:42:09PM -0500, Branden Robinson scrawled:
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 07:52:03AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 09:48:14AM -0600, Branden Robinson scrawled:
> > > Try changing the driver you use to "s3", though I don't recall off the
> > > top of my head how well the old S3 Trio chips are supported by the
> > > version of XFree86 4.x in woody (Debian 3.0).
> > 
> > They're not.
> 
> In that case I suggest trying the "vesa" driver, or upgrading to Debian
> "testing", which contains XFree86 4.2.1, which contains support for
> several varities of Trio64 chips.
> 
> http://www.xfree86.org/4.2.1/Status28.html#28
> 
> Alternatively, you can continue to use the xserver-s3 or xserver-svga
> packages from XFree86 3.3.6 (whichever works better for you), which are
> still available for the i386 architecture.

I just made do with using i386. I've now given my Diamond Stealth64
Video, cool as it was, away, because I have an AGP Radeon 9000. I'm
planning to start using a.out soon, and my sundial's due any week now!

:) d

-- 
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Trinity College, University of Melbourne



msg05434/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Bug#177369: xfs: blanks added to end of syslog lines -- wasteful

[Daniel Stone]

On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 01:20:17PM -0500, Branden Robinson scrawled:
> On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 07:09:57AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
> > wasteful blanks found:
> > 
> > for i in ' ' '  ' '   ';do echo '|';grep "$i"\$ /var/log/syslog.0;done|\
> > grep xfs|sort -u;false
> > Jan 18 16:27:08 debian xfs[456]: terminating 
> > Jan 19 05:43:52 debian xfs: ignoring font path element 
>/usr/lib/X11/fonts/cyrillic/ (unreadable) 
> > Jan 19 05:43:53 debian xfs: ignoring font path element /usr/lib/X11/fonts/CID 
>(unreadable) 
> 
> If you, or someone reading this report on debian-x, would like to get
> into XFree86 source hacking in a gentle way, here's a pointer to where
> and what needs to be fixed:
> 
> [0] branden@redwald:~/packages/xfree86 % grep -r terminating xc/programs/xfs/*
> xc/programs/xfs/difs/dispatch.c:NoticeF("terminating\n");
> [0] branden@redwald:~/packages/xfree86 % grep -r unreadable xc/programs/xfs/*
> xc/programs/xfs/difs/fonts.c:   NoticeF("ignoring font path element %s 
>(unreadable)\n", fpe->name);
> 
> My guess is those explicit newlines don't need to be passed to
> NoticeF().
> 
> Extra points for merging a patch for the above into patch #003.

203 occurrences between NoticeF, ErrorF, Error and FatalError. No
thanks.

-- 
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Trinity College, University of Melbourne



msg05435/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature