Re: Untranslatable strings
-=| Damyan Ivanov, Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 07:41:00PM +0300 |=- > I noticed a couple of strings that are not translatable and that > appear on almost every page of the website. > > One is "Debian" in front of each page title (excluding the ones > flagged as using "baretitle") in template/debian/basic.wml. > > The other is the hint () associated with the > Debian logo (top left on every page) in template/debian/navbar.wml. > > Is this deliberate or should I work on fixing this (via gettext)? No comments so far. May I take this as an approval of the proposed change? :) signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Non-breakable spaces on front page links
I was tracking down a problem I see with the Bulgarian translation of the front page of the website. The problem is that the thanslation of "Mailing List Archives" (the link before last in the fourth column) overlaps with the sponsor logo and is not entirely visible. The English pages don't exhibit the problem because of the minimal width of 11em set on the columns. First I thought there may be some CSS oddity, but in the end the reason was far more ordinary. The text uses non-breakable spaces and therefore can't be wrapped by the browser. The source of the non-breakable spaces are the original English texts in template.pot. I can see the reason for using in the old site, where this was used as a way of setting the width of the links menu. However, the new site doesn't seem to need such a crude method. My proposal is to replace non-breakable with ordinary spaces both in templates.pot and all the translated template.XX.po files. Any objections? signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Non-breakable spaces on front page links
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 11:05:11AM +0300, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
> I was tracking down a problem I see with the Bulgarian translation of
> the front page of the website. The problem is that the thanslation of
> "Mailing List Archives" (the link before last in the fourth column)
> overlaps with the sponsor logo and is not entirely visible.
>
> The English pages don't exhibit the problem because of the minimal
> width of 11em set on the columns.
>
> First I thought there may be some CSS oddity, but in the end the
> reason was far more ordinary. The text uses non-breakable spaces and
> therefore can't be wrapped by the browser.
>
> The source of the non-breakable spaces are the original English texts
> in template.pot. I can see the reason for using in the old
> site, where this was used as a way of setting the width of the links
> menu. However, the new site doesn't seem to need such a crude method.
>
> My proposal is to replace non-breakable with ordinary spaces both in
> templates.pot and all the translated template.XX.po files. Any
> objections?
Yes, this problem affects most of languages.
E.g. #612152 for russian.
If we remove non-breakable spaces then it will breake red dotted lines under
columns in small resolutions (dotted line of one column will under other,
while they should be in one line).
As possible solution can be changing min-width of ul#hometoc-col{a,b,c,d,e}
from current 11em to proper value to each language (near 14em or 15em for
russian). This min-with from debhome.css. It can be included in debian-XX.css
(where XX is language code) of each language.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Bug#623586: www.debian.org: new style sheet - line/item spacing is too big
Package: www.debian.org Severity: normal The new style sheet used for web pages could use some fine tuning. In the old pages it was possible to browse pages without much scrolling. Like e.g. package pages listing fit snuggly in a "page": depends recommends suggests With the current style sheet, there are huge gaps between the lines and bullets, and the rest. That requires constant need for scrolling in order to access the information. This is especially painful with low resulution screens; usually with laptops, sub notebooks and netbooks. Please find a way to fine tune style sheet's overall line spacing of elements; which also tightens spacing of bullets, lists etc. -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.38-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_DK.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_DK.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110421141131.30890.37834.report...@svn.cante.net
Patch for distrib/netinst.wml - 2nd try
(This is a re-post of my message from February 7th of 2011.) Hi! It seems some lines are mixed up in the "Tiny CDs, USB sticks, etc." section. Shouldn't the "Here are the links ..." be the last paragraph as it is in the "Network boot" section? Patch attached. Regards, Hans --- netinst.wml.orig2011-02-07 10:34:38.0 +0100 +++ netinst.wml 2011-02-07 10:35:30.0 +0100 @@ -48,6 +48,5 @@ There is some diversity in the support for installing from various -very small images between the architectures. Here are the links to -the available image files (look at the MANIFEST file for information). +very small images between the architectures. For details, please refer to the @@ -56,4 +55,7 @@ Obtaining System Installation Media. +Here are the links to the available image files (look at the MANIFEST +file for information). +
Re: Patch for distrib/netinst.wml - 2nd try
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, Le 21/04/2011 15:02, Hans F. Nordhaug a écrit : > (This is a re-post of my message from February 7th of 2011.) Don't know what people were doing at this time, too busy on the beach or breaking the website, no doubt ;-). > It seems some lines are mixed up in the "Tiny CDs, USB sticks, etc." > section. Shouldn't the "Here are the links ..." be the last paragraph > as it is in the "Network boot" section? Sure, thanks for the follow up. Since it was an easy fix, I updated the translations too, and added a colon instead of the final period, for consistency with the last entry. Regards David -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJNsIhaAAoJELgqIXr9/gnyrV0P/RM+azreMt8ypVqMAKfQjAY/ eKgEtxmawKG3Ql5l0vEAHweyqm5+MjFNF4ai2+lGTaa2wNTL8b2woLdR1LoAWdEI fof9fSLDzRqe72QxoAyXmkdxcJkrUu8Vh3hiWVFN/FUpU7c8RgBIVEYvPzjUO0jF Fg8elTpLJnKdopm7wrvqLefNhUnD1/KoqtBwMWarEVUOwJpPp3s32bcXdTED5gPU bHSJv8fwQijaYZe+CONJMgS4Y8mMKpnXsvz/Qj+uvuvykJpkDyMj4dW9eadUR9ma yos6p7jrA7OHrIaPwVVPGRQGydv+/2LEaAbfeZyAKoVDPbsVaeV7b4UPKteR7DEt JZuEsl/Fxm2S+7IHxWhM9Z0wjUf79J8yiUDwrogt6obZsaRdlWbfSLVbqxOVh2Ah RES9Xd+wUHuorzcNhXJqe0rmADKTLDLX05CrzEri6eKN15yE08kkk+D/rx0Rq9LU cuc63eRyGcKYpfyf1F2zYy5D1iaF/LzI1967LBNUxWnFGx7R+dy1lylqp+4JpTvy wGg5sX8D4reQpB6oBnzYVS2Dyttog1MH7hhfJGZZ40ruVlwvU073B87EqujTximW YUTQ+m3r71+SNn6/Apq9NpdEMHGs3b239JQGlDeQZYS4hrol/68HA3xH/oa8bd0i vsZ0FCfHcb722lt61zbb =2cEF -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4db0885b.5000...@tilapin.org
Processed: owner 610872
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > owner 610872 ! Bug #610872 [www.debian.org] www.debian.org: include ANSSI french crypto export/import document Owner recorded as David Prévot . > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 610872: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=610872 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.130341823927009.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#574550: marked as done (www.debian.org/devel/wnpp: move away from bts2ldap.debian.net)
Your message dated Thu, 21 Apr 2011 17:28:01 -0400 with message-id <4db0a161@altern.org> and subject line Re: Bug#574550: www.debian.org/devel/wnpp: move away from bts2ldap.debian.net has caused the Debian Bug report #574550, regarding www.debian.org/devel/wnpp: move away from bts2ldap.debian.net to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 574550: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=574550 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: www.debian.org Severity: wishlist As suggested by Andi below, bts2ldap.debian.net gateway should no longer be used. Such scripts (like wnpp ones) should move to SOAP interface. -- Simon Paillard --- Begin Message --- * Simon Paillard (simon.paill...@resel.enst-bretagne.fr) [100317 23:32]: > On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 09:11:18PM +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote: > > Package: www.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > > > on http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/being_packaged.en.html at the > > moment, I read: > > * libnss-gw-name: nss module that names the current > > =?UTF-8?Q?gateway=E2=80=99s?= IP address, 4 days in preparation. > > > > Obviously, the subject line is not properly decoded for use on this > > webpage. The page on bugs.debian.org displays it correctly. > > Actually, this is what bts2ldap.debian.net gateway returns, that we are > using to generate the wnpp pages. > > ldapsearch -x -b "dc=current,dc=bugs,dc=debian,dc=org" -h bts2ldap.debian.net > -p 10101 debbugsID=573605 debbugsTitle I'd prefer if wnpp could move to the soap interface - bts2ldap is not going to be maintained permanent, and basically also on a feature freeze. Cheers, Andi --- End Message --- --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 > libsoap-lite-perl needs to be installed on www-master Done. > before applying this patch. Done too. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJNsKFfAAoJELgqIXr9/gnytrsQAJAIh7AuyasErLq+MO6asbXc UpYU2hSZDdyFlgQAlW7D4KHITGgjPAadMqxsbUppUlkxBFZ5+jmg2d4R+GIgAyD5 nKtRh7ryzgP2kryqlkhQE0ZZ38NXJ6Cq2nAgEnDMgFP/C6Vyl24V0kCH8I+4oBtq BdjtWY6WHXB0u0jUoQQhNQLyWR4W6SBA/cnha7b6M88FogyGoZ4mdhr+n5GyuwXd HGXZXfUG7kNL2PpeDVXTmC7ajb/W9rhdGp6QX3ajhova80PjYQlwtFyMs86+156h Zl+eE/3sKg9APmY6aLzdOxyrlqVQjRNHPoZ0a/oG2ez17ab6iwrFY3s+MYuS86tz gtVqUaRvC2Iyk3jeuGmc6qZjDyseF4RYG8eqIAuHBy3AArqBjyB5yIvVfqc+SJSY 7dCCcKA7EJFNcIr/cgh/beNDMPK0Xu/SmHeW/KIgIHiuH2rC2Xk0G5hfKIc4ANG5 KJd+m+jrHVcxeyDyFHdB+gqtRtr2vvTxOZ09Tp8Mq6x4k3eV9xJgp3d+/UCaE7lq Vi26g+TZhoYOopP/R+p0vxoy60i3gBIw7UVGc4/0ZdZ03ly3f0Qs9zjMzzOQV+fb watlm8NKP2M7KVkxi+il32rlJ0cB+AnEHcIKNsWorQBKs4yvc6XHcpzXz1wUEcd7 SsDqTXQYur1f52pdi0sz =Owco -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- End Message ---
Bug#542783: marked as done (Please sort votes latest first)
Your message dated Thu, 21 Apr 2011 19:33:10 -0400 with message-id <201104211933.10978.da...@tilapin.org> and subject line Re: Please sort votes latest first has caused the Debian Bug report #542783, regarding Please sort votes latest first to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 542783: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=542783 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: www.debian.org Severity: normal Hi, on http://www.debian.org/vote/ there is a list of decided votes in the side bar. I believe it would be better to sort that list with the latest vote on top. MfG Goswin -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable-i386 APT policy: (1001, 'unstable-i386'), (500, 'unstable'), (400, 'experimental-i386'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.29.4-frosties-2 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_DE (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Hi, Le vendredi 21 août 2009 06:03:09, Goswin von Brederlow a écrit : > on http://www.debian.org/vote/ there is a list of decided votes in the > side bar. I believe it would be better to sort that list with the > latest vote on top. Agreed, it will be on line after the next rebuild. Regards David --- End Message ---
Processed: owner 604048, owner 505254
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > owner 604048 ! Bug #604048 [www.debian.org] www.debian.org: Count of 'days in preparation' is wrong on wnpp page Owner recorded as David Prévot . > owner 505254 ! Bug #505254 [www.debian.org] www.debian.org: Ability to sort RFP/ITP pages by age Bug #152609 [www.debian.org] www.debian.org: List of requested packages should be sorted by age as well as alphabetically Owner recorded as David Prévot . Owner recorded as David Prévot . > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 505254: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=505254 604048: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=604048 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.130342978428211.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#604048: www.debian.org: Count of 'days in preparation' is wrong on wnpp page
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 hi, Le 20/11/2010 06:05, Gerfried Fuchs a écrit : > * Thomas PIERSON [2010-11-19 20:13:46 CET]: >> I work on a package since 82 days but on wnpp page I can see '201 days in >> preparation'. >> >> I talk about this package. [1] >> [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=579859 > > It was filed on May 1st actually, I guess that's where the difference > comes from. I guess making the code that generates the data aware of > retitle and start calculating from there would require a fair bit of > work, though. I plan to provide those pages by “age since initiation” and “age since last activity” as requested in #505254. Would these two mentions in the list address this issue? It won't exactly provide the number of day of work, as Gerfried said, it would require a fair amount of trick, and the more I think about it, the more I can think of corner cases anyway. Regards David -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJNsMQkAAoJELgqIXr9/gnyEPgQAKt5AT4uU2ZK8/GirvEycCo8 zWx0ovJ82NgRMQxZFcMHd+aQJ/LID3hFF+0clB5JwnS80qbT0+I9whK2JwvmUfzN djOmj3Rz2CoQICo5gpNRV/CHH6vHmFdlsbLtCFPWRM/fqdbSjRyizZGuLhF1VGf/ +hwUQg53sQA9uEivXM+8d+Cw/lX4ZRUDmqs+U6VnT+mXfaeRPpSlaYoJOfyRCd5T bf82leowEVlKYpMyoYU7XOqVY43a/Sh5ozItPdLnToakCPgUywVqjeWhN2rmmn8G zMbQ8qrCPcGywO6fQaICzluCx4dxmDp2eC3wXWK2QfqQX/0odnFBeshBXiqAmYcJ gpeHWr+C7PMAEt9ctv4rMRd0Rbw2XFeZawpWya1vr1eRHiJIUH2+9oTJgodc2Tx+ sT+fDQ9kNZwmsYxHqGK9qUIyiwFX8NKu94tctOxQPDABMexUDeUChM0wNJb9vFlm zipB71qepVwzoIXfzTzagQfb6VnwKcqipQwTsJ3S2klRS/5qn6M1RSMpFMC9vUcF OuRbdXpZSF+eiXc0Jd8pxw6mMGeToBrcLq5l03MuF1oFpOt/ZdkJoAMDGdRA3ZFI bgx+kPI19/rRFcuiZv40aK72o9cvTPB7pqI6jiUnQP3cu3m4ooNr+LdtY51rxg9b HcSX0PtB5gYzUudbrE0c =GZSq -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4db0c425.3040...@tilapin.org
Bug#505254: www.debian.org: Ability to sort RFP/ITP pages by age
Hi, Le lundi 10 novembre 2008 23:21:22, vous avez écrit : > It would be nice to have the ability to sort the WNPP sub-pages by age. > Possibly even additionally the "age since initiation" and "age since > last activty". We're talking about the http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/being_packaged page (and similar ones). I'm willing to try and implement such feature, but would like some help for the wording. Currently, we have: - , in preparation since today. - , in preparation since yesterday. - , %s days in preparation. I'd propose something like: - , %s days in preparation, last activity today. - , %s days in preparation, last activity yesterday. - , %s days in preparation, last activity %s days ago. Or eventually, if a rewording of the first part is really needed: - <...>, preparation started %s days ago, last activity today. - <...>, preparation started %s days ago, last activity yesterday. - <...>, preparation started %s days ago, last activity %s days ago. Also, for the index, I hope the following would be fine: - %s packages being worked on, by age - %s packages being worked on, by last activity Even if it's short, I'm pretty sure I may propose ugly cheesy English as usual, so I'd welcome some proofread; better wording highly welcome. Regards David P.-S.: Not sure someone already wrote it, but I'm not the only one who agree with the following: Justin your help on the DPN (among other stuff) is really welcome, thanks a lot for being usually responsive on such a short notice. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201104212227.10936.da...@tilapin.org
