Hi, Le lundi 10 novembre 2008 23:21:22, vous avez écrit :
> It would be nice to have the ability to sort the WNPP sub-pages by age. > Possibly even additionally the "age since initiation" and "age since > last activty". We're talking about the http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/being_packaged page (and similar ones). I'm willing to try and implement such feature, but would like some help for the wording. Currently, we have: - <package: description>, in preparation since today. - <package: description>, in preparation since yesterday. - <package: description>, %s days in preparation. I'd propose something like: - <package: description>, %s days in preparation, last activity today. - <package: description>, %s days in preparation, last activity yesterday. - <package: description>, %s days in preparation, last activity %s days ago. Or eventually, if a rewording of the first part is really needed: - <...>, preparation started %s days ago, last activity today. - <...>, preparation started %s days ago, last activity yesterday. - <...>, preparation started %s days ago, last activity %s days ago. Also, for the index, I hope the following would be fine: - %s packages being worked on, by age - %s packages being worked on, by last activity Even if it's short, I'm pretty sure I may propose ugly cheesy English as usual, so I'd welcome some proofread; better wording highly welcome. Regards David P.-S.: Not sure someone already wrote it, but I'm not the only one who agree with the following: Justin your help on the DPN (among other stuff) is really welcome, thanks a lot for being usually responsive on such a short notice. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201104212227.10936.da...@tilapin.org
