Bug#694573: unblock: jackd2/1.9.8~dfsg.4+20120529git007cdc37-5
On 2012-11-28 00:12, Adrian Knoth wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: unblock > > [...] > > TIA > > unblock jackd2/1.9.8~dfsg.4+20120529git007cdc37-5 > > [...] Hi, There is a build failure on kfreebsd-amd64 stalling the migration to testing. Could you please have a look at it and look at solving it (even if that is imply nagging some buildd people for a give-back)? Thank you in advance, ~Niels -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50c45946.9070...@thykier.net
Bug#694490: release.debian.org: unblock: aephea/10.008-2
On 2012-12-02 13:23, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 21:55:25 +0100, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
>
>> diff -Nru aephea-10.008/debian/control aephea-10.008/debian/control
>> --- aephea-10.008/debian/control2011-04-27 07:40:21.0 +0200
>> +++ aephea-10.008/debian/control2012-11-26 10:12:59.0 +0100
>> @@ -11,6 +11,8 @@
>> Package: aephea
>> Architecture: all
>> Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}
>> +Breaks: zoem-doc
>> +Replaces: zoem-doc
>> Recommends: zoem
>> Description: text-based authoring tool for HTML
>> Aephea is an HTML authoring framework. It enforces HTML well-formedness
>>
> Does that actually work? I'm not sure what Breaks without a version
> even means...
>
> Cheers,
> Julien
It does; it means it breaks all versions of zoem-doc. To my knowledge,
it is mainly used when the package being replaced (e.g. zoem-doc) is no
longer built from any source (as an alternative to use the "highest"
known version of that package).
There was a request for making Lintian ignore the lack of version in
such cases a while back, so Lintian no longer complains about the lack
of version in this case.
~Niels
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50c4626a.5000...@thykier.net
Bug#695488: unblock: python-mock/0.8.0-3
On 2012-12-08 17:10, Andrew Starr-Bochicchio wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: unblock > > Please unblock package python-mock > > This upload resolved RC bug #694296, "python-mock-doc: missing > Breaks+Replaces: python-mock (<< 0.7.2)." > > Debdiff attached. > > unblock python-mock/0.8.0-3 Hi, This was unblocked by Adam on the 6th, so closing. Often you can use grep-excuses (from devscripts) to see if there is an existing unblock[1]. Thanks, ~Niels [1] It is not entirely perfect as the excuses are generated twice a day, so there is up to a 12-hour latency between the hint being added and the excuses showing it. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50c4635d.5050...@thykier.net
Bug#695488: marked as done (unblock: python-mock/0.8.0-3)
Your message dated Sun, 09 Dec 2012 11:15:25 +0100
with message-id <50c464bd.5030...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#695488: unblock: python-mock/0.8.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #695488,
regarding unblock: python-mock/0.8.0-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
695488: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=695488
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package python-mock
This upload resolved RC bug #694296, "python-mock-doc: missing
Breaks+Replaces: python-mock (<< 0.7.2)."
Debdiff attached.
unblock python-mock/0.8.0-3
diff -Nru python-mock-0.8.0/debian/changelog python-mock-0.8.0/debian/changelog
--- python-mock-0.8.0/debian/changelog 2012-06-04 14:34:13.0 -0400
+++ python-mock-0.8.0/debian/changelog 2012-11-30 17:02:09.0 -0500
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+python-mock (0.8.0-3) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Team upload.
+ * debian/control: python-mock-doc needs to Break/Replace
+python-mock (<< 0.7.2) to ensure clean upgrades from squeeze
+to wheezy. Thanks to Andreas Beckmann (Closes: #694296).
+
+ -- Andrew Starr-Bochicchio Fri, 30 Nov 2012 17:02:02 -0500
+
python-mock (0.8.0-2) unstable; urgency=low
* Add mock.egg-info/PKG-INFO to d/clean to allow two builds in a row
diff -Nru python-mock-0.8.0/debian/control python-mock-0.8.0/debian/control
--- python-mock-0.8.0/debian/control 2012-05-31 06:06:31.0 -0400
+++ python-mock-0.8.0/debian/control 2012-11-30 16:43:24.0 -0500
@@ -48,6 +48,8 @@
Section: doc
Architecture: all
Depends: ${misc:Depends}, ${sphinxdoc:Depends}
+Breaks: python-mock (<< 0.7.2)
+Replaces: python-mock (<< 0.7.2)
Description: Mocking and Testing Library (Documentation)
mock provides a core mock.Mock class that is intended to reduce the
need to create a host of trivial stubs throughout your test suite.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2012-12-09 11:09, Niels Thykier wrote:
> [...]
>
> Hi,
>
> [...] so closing [...]
Lets try that again with a -done.--- End Message ---
Re: Bug#689154: unblock: gnunet/0.9.3-3wheezy1
Dear release team, I prepared a new revision on gnunet and uploaded it to mentors. You'll find attached the full debdiff to the last unblocked revision (0.9.3-3). Here is the detail of the changes, with the answers to Julien: Le 25/11/2012 20:17, Julien Cristau a écrit : >> + * Revert the use dh_installdocs --link-doc (Closes: #687875, #687881, >> +#687883). > > Are the AUTHORS/README changes in various debian/*.docs files related? Yes they are, I need them back since they are not symlinked any more. >> + * Allways install libnss to /lib and fix FTBFS on ia64 (Closes: #688590). >> + * Install libnss to /lib, really fix #688590, thanks to Christian >> Grothoff. > > That one's rather bigger than strictly necessary… I updated it to minimal changes. >> + [ David Prévot ] >> + * debian/po/fr.po: Fix charset, and use non-breaking spaces. I kept this one since I am not the author and it seems quite simple to review. >> + > Cheers, > Julien Since gnunet/0.9.3-4 was uploaded to unstable with too many changes for wheezy, I targeted wheezy directly in the changelog (not really sure it shouldn't be testing-proposed-updates) and the revision is now called gnunet/0.9.3-3wheezy1. How does it works now to get it to wheezy directly ? Cheers, Bertrand diff -Nru gnunet-0.9.3/debian/changelog gnunet-0.9.3/debian/changelog --- gnunet-0.9.3/debian/changelog 2012-12-09 11:35:52.0 +0100 +++ gnunet-0.9.3/debian/changelog 2012-12-09 11:10:40.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,15 @@ +gnunet (0.9.3-3wheezy1) wheezy; urgency=low + + [ Bertrand Marc ] + * Revert the use dh_installdocs --link-doc (Closes: #687875, #687881, +#687883). + * Install libnss to /lib, really fix #688590, thanks to Christian Grothoff. + + [ David Prévot ] + * debian/po/fr.po: Fix charset, and use non-breaking spaces. + + -- Bertrand Marc Mon, 03 Dec 2012 09:12:51 +0100 + gnunet (0.9.3-3) unstable; urgency=low * debian/control: update Vcs-* to the new repository in collab-maint. diff -Nru gnunet-0.9.3/debian/gnunet-client.docs gnunet-0.9.3/debian/gnunet-client.docs --- gnunet-0.9.3/debian/gnunet-client.docs 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100 +++ gnunet-0.9.3/debian/gnunet-client.docs 2012-12-02 20:02:03.0 +0100 @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ +AUTHORS +README diff -Nru gnunet-0.9.3/debian/gnunet-dev.docs gnunet-0.9.3/debian/gnunet-dev.docs --- gnunet-0.9.3/debian/gnunet-dev.docs 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100 +++ gnunet-0.9.3/debian/gnunet-dev.docs 2012-12-02 20:02:03.0 +0100 @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ +AUTHORS +README diff -Nru gnunet-0.9.3/debian/gnunet.docs gnunet-0.9.3/debian/gnunet.docs --- gnunet-0.9.3/debian/gnunet.docs 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100 +++ gnunet-0.9.3/debian/gnunet.docs 2012-12-02 20:02:03.0 +0100 @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ +AUTHORS +README diff -Nru gnunet-0.9.3/debian/gnunet-server.docs gnunet-0.9.3/debian/gnunet-server.docs --- gnunet-0.9.3/debian/gnunet-server.docs 2012-12-09 11:35:52.0 +0100 +++ gnunet-0.9.3/debian/gnunet-server.docs 2012-12-02 20:02:03.0 +0100 @@ -1,2 +1,4 @@ +AUTHORS +README doc/README.mysql doc/README.postgres diff -Nru gnunet-0.9.3/debian/gnunet-server.install gnunet-0.9.3/debian/gnunet-server.install --- gnunet-0.9.3/debian/gnunet-server.install 2012-12-09 11:35:52.0 +0100 +++ gnunet-0.9.3/debian/gnunet-server.install 2012-12-09 10:58:48.0 +0100 @@ -41,9 +41,9 @@ usr/lib/libgnunettransporttesting.so.* usr/lib/libgnunettun.so.* usr/lib/libgnunetvpn.so.* -usr/lib/libnss_gns.so.2 -usr/lib/libnss_gns4.so.2 -usr/lib/libnss_gns6.so.2 +lib/libnss_gns.so.2 +lib/libnss_gns4.so.2 +lib/libnss_gns6.so.2 usr/lib/gnunet/*.so usr/share/gnunet/config.d usr/share/gnunet/hellos/* diff -Nru gnunet-0.9.3/debian/patches/configure_libnss.diff gnunet-0.9.3/debian/patches/configure_libnss.diff --- gnunet-0.9.3/debian/patches/configure_libnss.diff 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100 +++ gnunet-0.9.3/debian/patches/configure_libnss.diff 2012-12-09 11:11:31.0 +0100 @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ +--- a/src/gns/nss/Makefile.am b/src/gns/nss/Makefile.am +@@ -21,11 +21,7 @@ + + AM_LDFLAGS=-avoid-version -module -export-dynamic + +-if HAVE_SUDO + nssdir = /lib/ +-else +-nssdir = $(libdir) +-endif + + LIBTOOL = $(SUDO_BINARY) $(SHELL) $(top_builddir)/libtool + diff -Nru gnunet-0.9.3/debian/patches/series gnunet-0.9.3/debian/patches/series --- gnunet-0.9.3/debian/patches/series 2012-12-09 11:35:52.0 +0100 +++ gnunet-0.9.3/debian/patches/series 2012-12-09 11:06:53.0 +0100 @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@ +configure_libnss.diff support_GNU_hurd.patch sparc_alignment.patch diff -Nru gnunet-0.9.3/debian/po/fr.po gnunet-0.9.3/debian/po/fr.po --- gnunet-0.9.3/debian/po/fr.po 2012-12-09 11:35:52.0 +0100 +++ gnunet-0.9.3/debian/po/fr.po 2012-12-09 11:10:40.0 +0100 @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ "Language-Team: French \n" "Language: fr\n" "MIME-Version: 1.0\n" -"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1\n" +"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n" "Content-Transfer-
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 689154 unblock: gnunet/0.9.3-3wheezy1 Bug #689154 [release.debian.org] unblock: gnunet/0.9.3-4 Changed Bug title to 'unblock: gnunet/0.9.3-3wheezy1' from 'unblock: gnunet/0.9.3-4' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 689154: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689154 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.135505092615650.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#693243: unblock: ncpfs/2.2.6-9
On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 10:37:36PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
> I am a bit concerned about the suid drop from an upgrade PoV. I would
> expect a NEWS entry or so to inform people of the change just in case
> they were relying on the suid.
Possibly.
> Alternatively if the code-base is as dead as you suggest, would we be
> better of removing this package from Wheezy (or sid)?
Not really. We have no replacement and it is still used.
Bastian
--
Sometimes a man will tell his bartender things he'll never tell his doctor.
-- Dr. Phillip Boyce, "The Menagerie" ("The Cage"),
stardate unknown.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121209111523.ga5...@waldi.eu.org
Bug#691988: Re: Bug#691988: pre-approve unblock: libpam-ssh/1.92-15
Dear release team managers, by now the minimal version of the package libpam-ssh has been uploaded since 21 days, and an upstream version of the package meant for the experimental distribution is currently investigated by the sponsor. As reported in #685614 and #664177, libpam-ssh is important for some computer and cluster setup; for example, it can be used to mount the home partition on cluster using sshfs. So its absence in Wheezy may cause some troubles during the coming upgrade as it is already in Squeeze; according to popcon, libpam-ssh has grossly 400 users. As noticed in the original bug report, libpam-ssh was removed because some easy to fix RC bugs persisted due to its unofficial orphan state. It took me sometime to realize that this package was in an unofficial orphan state and that is was coldly removed because of easy to fix RC bugs. Second, as fresh Debian Aspirant Maintainer, it also took me sometime to see how I can manage its reintroduction and its update. Hence the nearly one year delay between its removable and its reintroduction in Sid, and its current absence in Wheezy. Jerome -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50c46c22.3050...@rezozer.net
Re: Update on state of Mono for Wheezy
On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 15:46:00 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > mummy also produces the "mummy" binary, so would need a sourceful upload > to drop the -cil package. It has a libunwind dependency so would also > need a tpu due to the libunwind8 mess. :-( For added fun, the package is > in sync between testing and unstable, so would need an unstable upload > first followed by an appropriately versioned tpu. > sid still has libunwind7-dev, is tpu really necessary? Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Update on state of Mono for Wheezy
On Sun, 2012-12-09 at 12:24 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 15:46:00 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > mummy also produces the "mummy" binary, so would need a sourceful upload > > to drop the -cil package. It has a libunwind dependency so would also > > need a tpu due to the libunwind8 mess. :-( For added fun, the package is > > in sync between testing and unstable, so would need an unstable upload > > first followed by an appropriately versioned tpu. > > > sid still has libunwind7-dev, is tpu really necessary? For some reason I had it in mind there was an unversioned libunwind-dev. So no, a source upload dropping the -cil package via sid should work fine; thanks for the cluebat. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1355053340.19225.33.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Processed: Re: Bug#694452: unblock: gjs/1.32.0-3
Processing control commands: > tags -1 moreinfo Bug #694452 [release.debian.org] unblock: gjs/1.32.0-3 Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 694452: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694452 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b694452.13550533702787.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#694452: unblock: gjs/1.32.0-3
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On 2012-11-26 15:31, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package gjs for an API extension that is necessary for a
> RC bugfix in gnome-documents.
>
> gjs (1.32.0-3) unstable; urgency=low
>
> * 02_gerror_class.patch, 03_gerror_details.patch: patches from
> upstream git. Introduce a class to manage GError correctly.
> Closes: #691551.
> * Bump shblibs version since this extends the API.
>
> Please require 15 days before testing migration since there is a small
> but existing possiblity of impact on gnome-shell and gnome-sushi.
>
> unblock gjs/1.32.0-3
>
> Thanks,
Hi,
I do have a concern or two about the actual diff (see gjs-diff.review,
attached to avoid line-mangling).
~Niels
+--- /dev/null 1970-01-01 00:00:00.0 +
gjs-1.32.0/gi/gerror.c 2012-11-26 10:59:33.538183526 +0100
+@@ -0,0 +1,589 @@
++/* -*- mode: C; c-basic-offset: 4; indent-tabs-mode: nil; -*- */
++/*
++ * Copyright (c) 2008 litl, LLC
Copy-waste? Similar coment for the .h file (in case it is)
I am a bit concerned about:
"""
+--- a/gjs/context.h
b/gjs/context.h
+@@ -68,7 +68,11 @@ gbooleangjs_context_define_string_array
(GjsContext *js_context,
+ GList* gjs_context_get_all (void);
+ void* gjs_context_get_native_context (GjsContext *js_context);
+
++/* initial_frame is a JSStackFrame, but cannot be exposed as such in the
++ public API. Pass NULL to get the topmost frame.
++*/
+ voidgjs_context_print_stack_to_buffer (GjsContext *js_context,
++ void *initial_frame,
+GString*buf);
"""
combined with
"""
+ void
+-gjs_context_print_stack_to_buffer(GjsContext* context, GString *buf)
++gjs_context_print_stack_to_buffer(GjsContext* context, void *initial, GString
*buf)
+ {
+ JSContext *js_context =
(JSContext*)gjs_context_get_native_context(context);
+-JSStackFrame* fp;
+-JSStackFrame* iter = NULL;
++JSStackFrame* fp = initial;
+ int num = 0;
+
+-g_string_append_printf(buf, "== Stack trace for context %p ==\n",
context);
+-while ((fp = JS_FrameIterator(js_context, &iter)) != NULL) {
++while (fp) {
^^
+ format_frame(js_context, fp, buf, num);
+ num++;
+-}
+
+-if(!num)
+-g_string_append_printf(buf, "(JavaScript stack is empty)\n");
+-g_string_append(buf, "\n");
++ JS_FrameIterator(js_context, &fp);
++}
+ }
"""
Seems to me that gjs_context_print_stack_to_buffer is (more or less) a
NO-OP if intial is NULL. (/me read "topmost" as the
"deepest/innermost" frame, so I was expecting it to dump the "entire"
stack. If "topmost" has a different meaning here or I missed
something in the diff, please do correct me)
Processed: retitle 691988 unblock: libpam-ssh/1.92-15
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 691988 unblock: libpam-ssh/1.92-15 Bug #691988 [release.debian.org] pre-approve unblock: libpam-ssh/1.92-15 Changed Bug title to 'unblock: libpam-ssh/1.92-15' from 'pre-approve unblock: libpam-ssh/1.92-15' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 691988: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691988 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13550539937573.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#694108: unblock: kfreebsd-8/8.3-6
Niels Thykier (24/11/2012): > Ack from release, now just waiting for d-i approval. d-i ack. Sorry for the lag… Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#694109: Make that kfreebsd-9_9.0-10
Niels Thykier (24/11/2012): > Ack from release, now just waiting for d-i approval. Interesting output in 'd'… Anyway, d-i ack, with apologies for the delay. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#694109: marked as done (unblock: kfreebsd-9/9.0-10)
Your message dated Sun, 09 Dec 2012 13:24:29 +0100 with message-id <50c482fd.7070...@thykier.net> and subject line Re: Bug#694109: Make that kfreebsd-9_9.0-10 has caused the Debian Bug report #694109, regarding unblock: kfreebsd-9/9.0-10 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 694109: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694109 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package kfreebsd-9 Same security update as for -8 I can revert the other change, though it's usefull to have in the source for our users unblock kfreebsd-9/9.0-9 dpkg-source: warning: extracting unsigned source package (/home/christoph/debian/kfreebsd-9_9.0-9.dsc) diff -Nru kfreebsd-9-9.0/debian/changelog kfreebsd-9-9.0/debian/changelog --- kfreebsd-9-9.0/debian/changelog 2012-10-29 12:10:41.0 -0700 +++ kfreebsd-9-9.0/debian/changelog 2012-11-23 13:59:41.0 -0800 @@ -1,9 +1,19 @@ -kfreebsd-9 (9.0-8) unstable; urgency=low +kfreebsd-9 (9.0-9) unstable; urgency=medium - * Build source package on a kfreebsd system -* This should bring back the udebs lost in -7 + * Apply patch for SA-12:08 / CVE-2012-4576: +memory access without proper validation in linux compat system +(Closes: #694097) + * Touch conf/DEBIAN to avoid build failures in case someone wants to build the +kernel with firmware included. + + -- Christoph Egger Fri, 23 Nov 2012 13:45:15 -0800 - -- Christoph Egger Mon, 29 Oct 2012 12:04:47 -0700 +kfreebsd-9 (9.0-8) unstable; urgency=low + + * Build source package on a kfreebsd system + * This should bring back the udebs lost in -7 + + -- Christoph Egger Mon, 29 Oct 2012 12:04:47 -0700 kfreebsd-9 (9.0-7) unstable; urgency=medium diff -Nru kfreebsd-9-9.0/debian/patches/SA-12_08.linux.patch kfreebsd-9-9.0/debian/patches/SA-12_08.linux.patch --- kfreebsd-9-9.0/debian/patches/SA-12_08.linux.patch 1969-12-31 16:00:00.0 -0800 +++ kfreebsd-9-9.0/debian/patches/SA-12_08.linux.patch 2012-11-23 13:48:51.0 -0800 @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ +Index: sys/compat/linux/linux_ioctl.c +=== +--- a/sys/compat/linux/linux_ioctl.c (revision 242578) b/sys/compat/linux/linux_ioctl.c (working copy) +@@ -2260,8 +2260,9 @@ again: + + ifc.ifc_len = valid_len; + sbuf_finish(sb); +- memcpy(PTRIN(ifc.ifc_buf), sbuf_data(sb), ifc.ifc_len); +- error = copyout(&ifc, uifc, sizeof(ifc)); ++ error = copyout(sbuf_data(sb), PTRIN(ifc.ifc_buf), ifc.ifc_len); ++ if (error == 0) ++ error = copyout(&ifc, uifc, sizeof(ifc)); + sbuf_delete(sb); + CURVNET_RESTORE(); + diff -Nru kfreebsd-9-9.0/debian/patches/series kfreebsd-9-9.0/debian/patches/series --- kfreebsd-9-9.0/debian/patches/series 2012-10-29 12:03:47.0 -0700 +++ kfreebsd-9-9.0/debian/patches/series 2012-11-23 13:44:03.0 -0800 @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ fix_VOP_VPTOCNP_bypass_for_nullfs.diff pf_counter_initialization_SVN236364.diff svn239447_SCTP_DoS.patch +SA-12_08.linux.patch # Other patches that might or might not be mergeable 001_misc.diff diff -Nru kfreebsd-9-9.0/debian/rules kfreebsd-9-9.0/debian/rules --- kfreebsd-9-9.0/debian/rules 2012-10-29 12:03:47.0 -0700 +++ kfreebsd-9-9.0/debian/rules 2012-11-23 13:58:59.0 -0800 @@ -179,6 +179,11 @@ # Configure the kernel cp debian/arch/$(cpu)/$*.config $(FLAVOR_DIR)-$*/sys/$(kfreebsd_cpu)/conf/ ln -sf $*.config $(FLAVOR_DIR)-$*/sys/$(kfreebsd_cpu)/conf/$(configfile) + # this file is generated by 999_firmware.patch. However, pretending + # someone wants to build a custom kernel with firmware included this + # yields to a build failure if the file does not exist. It can be empty, + # however. + touch $(FLAVOR_DIR)-$*/sys/$(kfreebsd_cpu)/conf/DEBIAN cd $(FLAVOR_DIR)-$*/sys/$(kfreebsd_cpu)/conf \ && config $(configfile) -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: kfreebsd-amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: kFreeBSD 9.0-2-amd64 Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On 2012-12-09 13:19, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Niels Thykier (24/11/2012): >> Ack from release, now just waiting for d-i approval. > > Interesting output in 'd'… > >
Bug#694108: marked as done (unblock: kfreebsd-8/8.3-6)
Your message dated Sun, 09 Dec 2012 13:24:44 +0100 with message-id <50c4830c.6010...@thykier.net> and subject line Re: Bug#694108: unblock: kfreebsd-8/8.3-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #694108, regarding unblock: kfreebsd-8/8.3-6 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 694108: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694108 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package kfreebsd-8 This is a security update. unblock kfreebsd-8/8.3-6 dpkg-source: warning: extracting unsigned source package (/home/christoph/debian/kfreebsd-8_8.3-5.dsc) diff -Nru kfreebsd-8-8.3/debian/changelog kfreebsd-8-8.3/debian/changelog --- kfreebsd-8-8.3/debian/changelog 2012-11-02 13:44:03.0 -0700 +++ kfreebsd-8-8.3/debian/changelog 2012-11-23 14:13:01.0 -0800 @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +kfreebsd-8 (8.3-6) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Apply patch for SA-12:08 / CVE-2012-4576: +memory access without proper validation in linux compat system +(Closes: #694096) + + -- Christoph Egger Fri, 23 Nov 2012 14:10:40 -0800 + kfreebsd-8 (8.3-5) unstable; urgency=medium [ Robert Millan ] diff -Nru kfreebsd-8-8.3/debian/patches/SA-12_08.linux.patch kfreebsd-8-8.3/debian/patches/SA-12_08.linux.patch --- kfreebsd-8-8.3/debian/patches/SA-12_08.linux.patch 1969-12-31 16:00:00.0 -0800 +++ kfreebsd-8-8.3/debian/patches/SA-12_08.linux.patch 2012-11-23 14:11:22.0 -0800 @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ +Index: sys/compat/linux/linux_ioctl.c +=== +--- a/sys/compat/linux/linux_ioctl.c (revision 242578) b/sys/compat/linux/linux_ioctl.c (working copy) +@@ -2260,8 +2260,9 @@ again: + + ifc.ifc_len = valid_len; + sbuf_finish(sb); +- memcpy(PTRIN(ifc.ifc_buf), sbuf_data(sb), ifc.ifc_len); +- error = copyout(&ifc, uifc, sizeof(ifc)); ++ error = copyout(sbuf_data(sb), PTRIN(ifc.ifc_buf), ifc.ifc_len); ++ if (error == 0) ++ error = copyout(&ifc, uifc, sizeof(ifc)); + sbuf_delete(sb); + CURVNET_RESTORE(); + diff -Nru kfreebsd-8-8.3/debian/patches/series kfreebsd-8-8.3/debian/patches/series --- kfreebsd-8-8.3/debian/patches/series 2012-11-02 13:31:42.0 -0700 +++ kfreebsd-8-8.3/debian/patches/series 2012-11-23 14:11:38.0 -0800 @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ SA-12_04.sysret.patch EN-12_02.ipv6refcount.patch SCTP_DOS_svn239447.diff +SA-12_08.linux.patch # Other patches that might or might not be mergeable 001_misc.diff -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: kfreebsd-amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: kFreeBSD 9.0-2-amd64 Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On 2012-12-09 13:17, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Niels Thykier (24/11/2012): >> Ack from release, now just waiting for d-i approval. > > d-i ack. Sorry for the lag… > > Mraw, > KiBi. Unblocked, thanks. ~Niels--- End Message ---
Bug#694745: unblock: xorg-server/2:1.12.4-4
Adam D. Barratt (29/11/2012): > Unblocked, but needs the predictable d-i ack; thanks. d-i ack, sorry for the delay. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#694826: unblock: s390-tools/1.16.0-2
Adam D. Barratt (01/12/2012): > Unblocked; thanks. Needs a d-i ack, so CCing KiBi. d-i ack, and sorry for the delay. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#694094: unblock: libaqbanking/5.0.24-2
Hi Julien,
Am 26.11.2012 13:35, schrieb Julien Cristau:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 10:26:28 +0100, Micha Lenk wrote:
>
>> Hi Adam,
>>
>> On 11/25/2012 09:41 PM CEST +02:00, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2012-11-23 at 21:52 +0100, Micha Lenk wrote:
This release fixes Debian bug #688831, symlinks in package
libaqbanking34-dev pointing to non-existent files (a policy violation).
Additionally I changed debian/rules so that it injects build flags from
dpkg-buildflags to support the Security Hardening Build Flags, a release
goal.
>>>
>>> Was the hardening change requested by the Security Team? I'm somewhat
>>> wary of build-time changes to libraries with reverse dependencies at
>>> this point.
>>
>> No, it wasn't. It was just a low hanging fruit, I thought.
>>
>> If you feel uncomfortable with the hardening change, I can upload again
>> with the hardening change reverted.
>>
> Yes please.
I've just uploaded libaqbanking 5.0.24-3 that has the hardening change
reverted. Please see the attached diff to the version 5.0.24-1 currently
available in testing.
Regards,
Micha
diff -Nru libaqbanking-5.0.24/debian/changelog libaqbanking-5.0.24/debian/changelog
--- libaqbanking-5.0.24/debian/changelog 2012-06-03 20:13:45.0 +0200
+++ libaqbanking-5.0.24/debian/changelog 2012-12-09 13:43:14.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,19 @@
+libaqbanking (5.0.24-3) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Revert injection of build flags from dpkg-buildflags, as requested by the
+release team.
+
+ -- Micha Lenk Sun, 09 Dec 2012 13:42:14 +0100
+
+libaqbanking (5.0.24-2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Don't ship symlink /usr/lib/libaqbankingpp.so as we don't ship its
+destination libaqbankingpp.so.0.0.0 (closes: #688831).
+ * Inject build flags from dpkg-buildflags, enabling support for the Security
+Hardening Build Flag release goal.
+
+ -- Micha Lenk Mon, 12 Nov 2012 21:59:15 +0100
+
libaqbanking (5.0.24-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream release
diff -Nru libaqbanking-5.0.24/debian/rules libaqbanking-5.0.24/debian/rules
--- libaqbanking-5.0.24/debian/rules 2012-06-03 19:22:11.0 +0200
+++ libaqbanking-5.0.24/debian/rules 2012-12-09 13:43:14.0 +0100
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@
# Remove .la files for shared plugin libraries
find $(CURDIR)/debian/tmp/usr/lib/gwenhywfar/plugins -name \*.la -exec rm -v \{\} \;
find $(CURDIR)/debian/tmp/usr/lib/aqbanking/plugins -name \*.la -exec rm -v \{\} \;
+ rm -vf $(CURDIR)/debian/tmp/usr/lib/libaqbankingpp.so
override_dh_strip:
dh_strip --dbg-package=libaqbanking34-dbg
Bug#694094: marked as done (unblock: libaqbanking/5.0.24-2)
Your message dated Sun, 9 Dec 2012 15:08:44 +0100
with message-id <20121209140844.gs5...@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#694094: unblock: libaqbanking/5.0.24-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #694094,
regarding unblock: libaqbanking/5.0.24-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
694094: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694094
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package libaqbanking
This release fixes Debian bug #688831, symlinks in package
libaqbanking34-dev pointing to non-existent files (a policy violation).
Additionally I changed debian/rules so that it injects build flags from
dpkg-buildflags to support the Security Hardening Build Flags, a release
goal.
I uploaded the wanted version 5.0.24-2 already ten days ago to unstable,
so for review you can compare the version in testing (5.0.24-1) with the
version in unstable (5.0.24-2). The changelog entry of version 5.0.24-2 is:
libaqbanking (5.0.24-2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Don't ship symlink /usr/lib/libaqbankingpp.so as we don't ship its
destination libaqbankingpp.so.0.0.0 (closes: #688831).
* Inject build flags from dpkg-buildflags, enabling support for the
Security Hardening Build Flag release goal.
Debdiff is also attached.
unblock libaqbanking/5.0.24-2
diff -Nru libaqbanking-5.0.24/debian/changelog libaqbanking-5.0.24/debian/changelog
--- libaqbanking-5.0.24/debian/changelog 2012-06-03 20:13:45.0 +0200
+++ libaqbanking-5.0.24/debian/changelog 2012-11-12 22:39:24.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+libaqbanking (5.0.24-2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Don't ship symlink /usr/lib/libaqbankingpp.so as we don't ship its
+destination libaqbankingpp.so.0.0.0 (closes: #688831).
+ * Inject build flags from dpkg-buildflags, enabling support for the Security
+Hardening Build Flag release goal.
+
+ -- Micha Lenk Mon, 12 Nov 2012 21:59:15 +0100
+
libaqbanking (5.0.24-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream release
diff -Nru libaqbanking-5.0.24/debian/rules libaqbanking-5.0.24/debian/rules
--- libaqbanking-5.0.24/debian/rules 2012-06-03 19:22:11.0 +0200
+++ libaqbanking-5.0.24/debian/rules 2012-11-12 21:58:28.0 +0100
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
override_dh_auto_configure:
dh_auto_configure --max-parallel=1 -- \
+ $(shell dpkg-buildflags --export=configure) \
--with-backends="aqnone aqhbci aqofxconnect"
override_dh_auto_test:
@@ -42,6 +43,7 @@
# Remove .la files for shared plugin libraries
find $(CURDIR)/debian/tmp/usr/lib/gwenhywfar/plugins -name \*.la -exec rm -v \{\} \;
find $(CURDIR)/debian/tmp/usr/lib/aqbanking/plugins -name \*.la -exec rm -v \{\} \;
+ rm -vf $(CURDIR)/debian/tmp/usr/lib/libaqbankingpp.so
override_dh_strip:
dh_strip --dbg-package=libaqbanking34-dbg
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 15:00:36 +0100, Micha Lenk wrote:
> I've just uploaded libaqbanking 5.0.24-3 that has the hardening change
> reverted. Please see the attached diff to the version 5.0.24-1 currently
> available in testing.
>
Unblocked, thanks.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
magpierss: #694052
Hi, I intend to fix #694052 [0], what do you think about it? [0] http://bugs.debian.org/694052 This is the patch: -Conflicts: magpierss (<= 0.72-5) -Replaces: magpierss (<= 0.72-5) +Conflicts: magpierss (<< 0.72-6) +Replaces: magpierss (<< 0.72-6) Cheers, -- Marcelo Jorge Vieira xmpp:me...@jabber-br.org http://metaldot.alucinados.com signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#687666: unblock pre-approval: qt4-x11/4:4.8.2-3
On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 14:14:46 -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > On Sat 08 Dec 2012 10:59:44 Julien Cristau escribió: > > Why are libqt4-dbus and qdbus separate packages in the first place? > > libqt4-dbus used to ship both the library and qdbus, an application. As part > of the multiarchification of Qt4, they needed to become separate packages. > > > What happens the day libQtDBus changes SONAME? > > It will not in wheezy. And we are already working in a proper transition for > stuff that currently depends on libqt4-dbus just because they actually need > qdbus. > > So for Jessie we will eliminate libqtdbus4. And, by the way we mangled the > symbols files, no package should depend on libqtdbus4 ever (symbols point to > libqt4-dbus). > OK, go ahead then I guess. Sorry it took me so long to wrap my head around this. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#691640: unblock: nss-pam-ldapd/0.8.10-4
Control: tag -1 - moreinfo Control: retitle -1 unblock: nss-pam-ldapd/0.8.10-4 On Sat, 2012-12-08 at 15:17 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 23:05:06 +0200, Arthur de Jong wrote: > > +@@ -97,39 +85,27 @@ static inline void tio_tv_prepare(struct > > + deadline->tv_usec=0; > > + return; > > + } > > +- tio_tv_add(deadline,timeout); > > ++ deadline->tv_sec+=timeout/1000; > > ++ deadline->tv_sec+=(timeout%1000)*1000; > > Looks to me like the second line should set tv_usec, not tv_sec Thanks for the detailed review and catching this. This didn't show up in the tests because there is sanity checking code in place that prevents huge timeout values that could be caused by clock jumps so luckily it shouldn't be a severe problem in practice. It will be fixed in the next upstream release and I've uploaded 0.8.10-4 to unstable that contains this fix. Thanks for your hard work, -- -- arthur - adej...@debian.org - http://people.debian.org/~adejong -- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Processed: Re: Bug#691640: unblock: nss-pam-ldapd/0.8.10-4
Processing control commands: > tag -1 - moreinfo Bug #691640 [release.debian.org] unblock: nss-pam-ldapd/0.8.10-3 Removed tag(s) moreinfo. > retitle -1 unblock: nss-pam-ldapd/0.8.10-4 Bug #691640 [release.debian.org] unblock: nss-pam-ldapd/0.8.10-3 Changed Bug title to 'unblock: nss-pam-ldapd/0.8.10-4' from 'unblock: nss-pam-ldapd/0.8.10-3' -- 691640: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691640 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b691640.135506557520821.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#691640: marked as done (unblock: nss-pam-ldapd/0.8.10-4)
Your message dated Sun, 9 Dec 2012 16:21:26 +0100 with message-id <20121209152126.gu5...@radis.cristau.org> and subject line Re: Bug#691640: unblock: nss-pam-ldapd/0.8.10-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #691640, regarding unblock: nss-pam-ldapd/0.8.10-4 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 691640: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691640 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package nss-pam-ldapd Dear release team, I've uploaded nss-pam-ldapd 0.8.10-3 to unstable that includes the following fixes (from debian/changelog): * fix a problem in sed logic for commenting out disabled options (closes: #689296) * support "EXTERNAL" SASL mechanism in debconf configuration (LP: #1063923) (the debconf template update has been postponed to avoid having to update all translations for a relatively minor change) * 01-use-poll-instead-of-select.patch: use poll() instead of select() for checking file descriptor activity to also correctly work if more than FD_SETSIZE files are already open (closes: #690319) The first two should be really simple changes. The last one backports a change from the upstream 0.8.11 release. Attached is a debdiff between 0.8.10-1 currently in testing and 0.8.10-2. Thanks. unblock nss-pam-ldapd/0.8.10-3 -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- -- arthur - adej...@debian.org - http://people.debian.org/~adejong -- diff -Nru nss-pam-ldapd-0.8.10/debian/changelog nss-pam-ldapd-0.8.10/debian/changelog --- nss-pam-ldapd-0.8.10/debian/changelog 2012-08-31 23:43:09.0 +0200 +++ nss-pam-ldapd-0.8.10/debian/changelog 2012-10-14 23:00:01.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,16 @@ +nss-pam-ldapd (0.8.10-3) unstable; urgency=low + + * fix a problem in sed logic for commenting out disabled options +(closes: #689296) + * support "EXTERNAL" SASL mechanism in debconf configuration (LP: #1063923) +(the debconf template has been postponed to avoid having to update all +translations for a relatively minor change) + * 01-use-poll-instead-of-select.patch: use poll() instead of select() +for checking file descriptor activity to also correctly work if more +than FD_SETSIZE files are already open (closes: #690319) + + -- Arthur de Jong Sun, 14 Oct 2012 23:00:00 +0200 + nss-pam-ldapd (0.8.10-2) unstable; urgency=low * fix typo in comment (thanks Caleb Callaway) diff -Nru nss-pam-ldapd-0.8.10/debian/nslcd.postinst nss-pam-ldapd-0.8.10/debian/nslcd.postinst --- nss-pam-ldapd-0.8.10/debian/nslcd.postinst 2012-08-31 23:27:07.0 +0200 +++ nss-pam-ldapd-0.8.10/debian/nslcd.postinst 2012-10-01 21:28:17.0 +0200 @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ # lines to not match nomatch_re="^$param_re[[:space:]][[:space:]]*\(aliases\|ethers\|group\|hosts\|netgroup\|networks\|passwd\|protocols\|rpc\|services\|shadow\)" # comment out the option -sed -i '/'"$nomatch_re"'/n;s/^'"$param_re"'[[:space:]].*$/#&/i' "$CONFFILE" +sed -i '/'"$nomatch_re"'/!s/^'"$param_re"'[[:space:]].*$/#&/i' "$CONFFILE" # we're done done return 0 diff -Nru nss-pam-ldapd-0.8.10/debian/nslcd.templates nss-pam-ldapd-0.8.10/debian/nslcd.templates --- nss-pam-ldapd-0.8.10/debian/nslcd.templates 2012-04-27 00:02:58.0 +0200 +++ nss-pam-ldapd-0.8.10/debian/nslcd.templates 2012-10-08 22:43:56.0 +0200 @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ Template: nslcd/ldap-sasl-mech Type: select -Choices: auto, LOGIN, PLAIN, NTLM, CRAM-MD5, DIGEST-MD5, GSSAPI, OTP +Choices: auto, LOGIN, PLAIN, NTLM, CRAM-MD5, DIGEST-MD5, GSSAPI, OTP, EXTERNAL _Description: SASL mechanism to use: Choose the SASL mechanism that will be used to authenticate to the LDAP database: diff -Nru nss-pam-ldapd-0.8.10/debian/patches/01-use-poll-instead-of-select.patch nss-pam-ldapd-0.8.10/debian/patches/01-use-poll-instead-of-select.patch --- nss-pam-ldapd-0.8.10/debian/patches/01-use-poll-instead-of-select.patch 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100 +++ nss-pam-ldapd-0.8.10/debian/patches/01-use-poll-instead-of-select.patch 2012-10-14 23:01:08.0 +0200 @@ -0,0 +1,440 @@ +Description: use poll() instead of select() to check file descriptor activity + This patch repla
Bug#687666: unblock pre-approval: qt4-x11/4:4.8.2-3
On Sun 09 Dec 2012 11:59:22 Julien Cristau escribió: > On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 14:14:46 -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > > On Sat 08 Dec 2012 10:59:44 Julien Cristau escribió: > > > Why are libqt4-dbus and qdbus separate packages in the first place? > > > > libqt4-dbus used to ship both the library and qdbus, an application. As > > part of the multiarchification of Qt4, they needed to become separate > > packages. > > > > > What happens the day libQtDBus changes SONAME? > > > > It will not in wheezy. And we are already working in a proper transition > > for stuff that currently depends on libqt4-dbus just because they > > actually need qdbus. > > > > So for Jessie we will eliminate libqtdbus4. And, by the way we mangled > > the symbols files, no package should depend on libqtdbus4 ever (symbols > > point to libqt4-dbus). > > OK, go ahead then I guess. Sorry it took me so long to wrap my head > around this. Thanks Julien! I will non the less resend the debdiff, as some of the changes have already been uploaded and we also need to tackle a CVS bug. I hope I'll do it today. Kinds regards, Lisandro. -- Hacer algo siempre te llevará más tiempo del que esperabas, incluso si tienes en cuenta la ley de Hofstadter. Douglas Hofstadter http://mundogeek.net/archivos/2009/09/05/la-ley-de-hofstadter/ Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [r...@cpan.org: CVE-2012-5195: heap buffer overrun with perl + glibc]
On Sun, December 9, 2012 16:10, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: >> On Sun, December 9, 2012 13:11, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: >> > Thank you Dominic for keeping updated. Security team, attached is the >> > proposed debdiff for the libcgi-pm-perl part. >> >> Yes, please upload this to security master. > > I did a grave mistake and the upload landed on ftp-master. Shortly > after I noticed my mistake I tried to cancel but it was to late, and > it's now on stable-new. > > I'm sorry that his happened, I'm normaly checking my uploads really > well. > > I hope that I can sort this out soon. I'm CC'ing the stable release managers, who can reject the upload after which you can retry. Cheers, Thijs -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/3a6bc8d3e14e2ee50851cba098350261.squir...@aphrodite.kinkhorst.nl
Bug#691988: unblock: libpam-ssh/1.92-15
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, for what it's worth, I'm currently acting as a sponsor for Jérôme. He seems clearly interested in maintaining this package on the long run. I am currently reviewing an upload targeted at experimental which is of good quality. Kind regards, Thibaut. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJQxLmtAAoJEJOUU0jg3ChAvpEQAKY/XBa4J6KpgxqRBv5Nz2g2 x/Qfp4qIZJPVzfN/mnhjdJOnTbLJMqIfpuJsB3VTQfYuIwkEmV3RimR31IecyPt6 DSGNX0jWC3CiqGfV6XwC0Q4n1eylP+hPnN82OB5MBkYU7Pc9xPzP8NP2bm7iX8rJ 9/hbdO63tO2NIQORlxrTxOasRXknV/KGUVXK+dD28t/glfqcYdxNebBQP9wawcY3 GKy2IXqEMi1sw3o0YR+q1Eq+/D4lsJRFLqCh8aNsx5sXhX+cW/EBBX0cPOp1aAbi EuqJhORLh8n3BP1gruSE6BQlFBd1mJ8a9FaIKeOn/vetsFhYcsepAxCwE9t9VIUf iJT4hr9yMdle2zKLjFZzz7rKXdYphbsMqCYfdgpjUy6CGHHVDswP38WVsUfomhf/ Gb5SNuWbolyiJnNuDpDxlFZRNHrB7LmFlYX4TRONWAS8yei53bERMjviTzrDB4LK 9xMCj/KCcS4S7C9QQSbC0+z589F496rjhZouV+yhzV3opH796hs9rSbqPEH+2mkz x5kazP8o9T9e9jaMxCWWiqaAJ/8XhDkVUykOILu7HHmqSiHmn8E0G3gdHEyOjhC+ 8Ndwz2jOWxctwcZcfR7atqs4FhzM/xd0akJwv2GSDUF65af3f7yLHBLAFVhH5uA3 VooG/6mxbEZf7ZlZm2Yu =yL+Q -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50c4b9b6.9090...@debian.org
Re: [r...@cpan.org: CVE-2012-5195: heap buffer overrun with perl + glibc]
On Sun, 2012-12-09 at 17:03 +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > On Sun, December 9, 2012 16:10, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > I did a grave mistake and the upload landed on ftp-master. Shortly > > after I noticed my mistake I tried to cancel but it was to late, and > > it's now on stable-new. [...] > I'm CC'ing the stable release managers, who can reject the upload after > which you can retry. Salvatore mentioned the upload on #debian-release; Julien's flagged it for rejection so it should be gone soon. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1355069777.19225.40.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Bug#694573: unblock: jackd2/1.9.8~dfsg.4+20120529git007cdc37-5
On 09/12/12 09:26, Niels Thykier wrote: > On 2012-11-28 00:12, Adrian Knoth wrote: >> [...] >> unblock jackd2/1.9.8~dfsg.4+20120529git007cdc37-5 > [...] > There is a build failure on kfreebsd-amd64 stalling the migration to > testing. Could you please have a look at it and look at solving it > (even if that is imply nagging some buildd people for a give-back)? Hi Christoph, Please could you give back jackd2 to the kfreebsd-amd64 buildds... It seems to have hung during the waf build, which happens about 25% of the time. Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50c4ba2d.5010...@pyro.eu.org
Bug#694826: marked as done (unblock: s390-tools/1.16.0-2)
Your message dated Sun, 09 Dec 2012 16:20:07 +
with message-id <1355070007.19225.41.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#694826: unblock: s390-tools/1.16.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #694826,
regarding unblock: s390-tools/1.16.0-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
694826: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694826
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package s390-tools
The udev rules of s390-tools referred to the now non-existing udev tool
vol_id. The update to 1.16.0-2 correct this and use blkid instead. This
eliminates a spurious warning on-boot.
diff -Nru s390-tools-1.16.0/debian/changelog s390-tools-1.16.0/debian/changelog
--- s390-tools-1.16.0/debian/changelog 2011-12-14 10:06:36.0 +
+++ s390-tools-1.16.0/debian/changelog 2012-11-30 22:11:16.0 +
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+s390-tools (1.16.0-2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Drop the now non-existent vol_id from the shipped udev ruleset
+and use blkid instead.
+
+ -- Philipp Kern Fri, 30 Nov 2012 22:10:43 +
+
s390-tools (1.16.0-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream release.
diff -Nru s390-tools-1.16.0/debian/s390-tools.udev
s390-tools-1.16.0/debian/s390-tools.udev
--- s390-tools-1.16.0/debian/s390-tools.udev2011-10-06 18:57:51.0
+
+++ s390-tools-1.16.0/debian/s390-tools.udev2012-11-30 22:10:41.0
+
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
KERNEL=="dasd*[0-9]", ENV{ID_UID}=="?*",
SYMLINK+="disk/by-id/$env{ID_BUS}-$env{ID_UID}-part%n"
# by-label/by-uuid (filesystem properties)
-IMPORT{program}="/sbin/vol_id --export $tempnode"
+IMPORT{program}="/sbin/blkid -p -o udev $tempnode"
ENV{ID_FS_USAGE}=="filesystem|other|crypto", ENV{ID_FS_UUID}=="?*",
SYMLINK+="disk/by-uuid/$env{ID_FS_UUID}"
ENV{ID_FS_USAGE}=="filesystem|other", ENV{ID_FS_LABEL_SAFE}=="?*",
SYMLINK+="disk/by-label/$env{ID_FS_LABEL_SAFE}"
unblock s390-tools/1.16.0-2
Kind regards and thanks
Philipp Kern
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sun, 2012-12-09 at 14:40 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Adam D. Barratt (01/12/2012):
> > Unblocked; thanks. Needs a d-i ack, so CCing KiBi.
>
> d-i ack, and sorry for the delay.
unblock-udeb added; thanks.
Regards,
Adam--- End Message ---
Bug#694745: marked as done (unblock: xorg-server/2:1.12.4-4)
Your message dated Sun, 09 Dec 2012 16:22:34 +
with message-id <1355070154.19225.42.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#694745: unblock: xorg-server/2:1.12.4-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #694745,
regarding unblock: xorg-server/2:1.12.4-4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
694745: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694745
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package xorg-server
Two changes:
- trivial memory leak in the glyph cache, only affects
xserver-xorg-core-udeb (the debs use a different code path)
- fix for pointer jumps with absolute devices, seems to be particularly
bad in virtualbox.
Description of the second change:
dix: set the device transformation matrix
The property handler is registered after setting the property, so
dev->transform remains as all-zeros. That causes pixman_f_transform_invert()
to fail (in transformAbsolute()) and invert remains as garbage. This
may then cause a cursor jump to 0,0.
Since the axes are not yet initialized here and we need to allow for drivers
changing the matrix, we cannot use the property handler for matrix
initialization, essentially duplicating the code.
Triggered by the fix to (#49347) in 749a593e49adccdf1225be28a521412ec85333f4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852841
Also reported upstream at
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54353
and in Debian as #694598 and #688860.
unblock xorg-server/2:1.12.4-4
Full debdiff follows.
diff -u xorg-server-1.12.4/debian/changelog xorg-server-1.12.4/debian/changelog
--- xorg-server-1.12.4/debian/changelog
+++ xorg-server-1.12.4/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+xorg-server (2:1.12.4-4) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Fix memory leak in libnettle sha1 patch. Thanks, Yaakov Selkowitz!
+ * Cherry-pick from upstream:
+- dix: set the device transformation matrix. Avoids cursor jumps in
+ virtualbox (closes: #694598)
+
+ -- Julien Cristau Thu, 29 Nov 2012 19:27:31 +0100
+
xorg-server (2:1.12.4-3) unstable; urgency=low
* Replace EXA patch from previous upload with the one actually applied
diff -u
xorg-server-1.12.4/debian/patches/02_Add-libnettle-as-option-for-sha1.diff
xorg-server-1.12.4/debian/patches/02_Add-libnettle-as-option-for-sha1.diff
--- xorg-server-1.12.4/debian/patches/02_Add-libnettle-as-option-for-sha1.diff
+++ xorg-server-1.12.4/debian/patches/02_Add-libnettle-as-option-for-sha1.diff
@@ -8,8 +8,10 @@
[jcristau: forward-ported from 1.7 to 1.8]
Signed-off-by: Julien Cristau
---
a/configure.ac
-+++ b/configure.ac
+Index: xorg-server/configure.ac
+===
+--- xorg-server.orig/configure.ac
xorg-server/configure.ac
@@ -1339,7 +1339,7 @@ CORE_INCS='-I$(top_srcdir)/include -I$(t
# SHA1 hashing
@@ -36,8 +38,10 @@
AC_MSG_CHECKING([for SHA1 implementation])
if test "x$with_sha1" = x; then
AC_MSG_ERROR([No suitable SHA1 implementation found])
a/include/dix-config.h.in
-+++ b/include/dix-config.h.in
+Index: xorg-server/include/dix-config.h.in
+===
+--- xorg-server.orig/include/dix-config.h.in
xorg-server/include/dix-config.h.in
@@ -157,6 +157,9 @@
/* Define to use libsha1 for SHA1 */
#undef HAVE_SHA1_IN_LIBSHA1
@@ -48,9 +52,11 @@
/* Define to 1 if you have the `shmctl64' function. */
#undef HAVE_SHMCTL64
a/os/xsha1.c
-+++ b/os/xsha1.c
-@@ -148,6 +148,31 @@ x_sha1_final(void *ctx, unsigned char re
+Index: xorg-server/os/xsha1.c
+===
+--- xorg-server.orig/os/xsha1.c
xorg-server/os/xsha1.c
+@@ -148,6 +148,32 @@ x_sha1_final(void *ctx, unsigned char re
return 1;
}
@@ -60,7 +66,7 @@
+
+void *x_sha1_init(void)
+{
-+struct sha1_ctx *ctx = xalloc(sizeof(*ctx));
++struct sha1_ctx *ctx = malloc(sizeof(*ctx));
+if (!ctx)
+return NULL;
+sha1_init(ctx);
@@ -76,6 +82,7 @@
+int x_sha1_final(void *ctx, unsigned char result[20])
+{
+sha1_digest(ctx, 20, result);
++free(ctx);
+return 1;
+}
+
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- xorg-server-1.12.4.orig/dix/devices.c
+++ xorg-server-1.12.4/dix/devices.c
@@ -303,6 +303,9 @@
/* unity matrix */
memset(transform, 0, sizeof(transform));
transform[0] = transform[4]
NEW changes in stable-new
Processing changes file: libcgi-pm-perl_3.49-1squeeze2_amd64.changes REJECT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1thjyu-00061o...@franck.debian.org
Processed: tagging 695174
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 695174 - moreinfo Bug #695174 [release.debian.org] t-p-u pre-approval owncloud/4.0.4debian2-3.1 Removed tag(s) moreinfo. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 695174: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=695174 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.135507113925970.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#681016: [release.debian.org] unblock: dotlrn/2.5.0+dfsg-8
On Sat, 2012-10-27 at 16:57 +0200, Hector Romojaro wrote: > I have fixed the postinst permission issue, the postrm aolserver call > and now the local config modifications are authoritative and debconf > values are overwritten with them at the beginning of the config script. > > debdiff between testing version (2.5.0+dfsg6) and this new one (2.5.0 > +dfsg-6+wheezy3) is attached. I have chosen to send the debdiff before > asking for upload to t-p-u this time, so I don't have to bother my > sponsor. I guess it's better for all, but please let me know if I am > wrong. Once the changes are accepted, i will ask him for upload to t-p-u > and notify here afterwards. Apologies for the long delay in getting back to you about this; it managed to slip under the radar somehow. Please go ahead with the upload; thanks. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1355071956.19225.45.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
NEW changes in stable-new
Processing changes file: iceweasel_3.5.16-20_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: iceweasel_3.5.16-20_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: iceweasel_3.5.16-20_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: iceweasel_3.5.16-20_ia64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: iceweasel_3.5.16-20_kfreebsd-amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: iceweasel_3.5.16-20_kfreebsd-i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: iceweasel_3.5.16-20_mips.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: iceweasel_3.5.16-20_mipsel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: iceweasel_3.5.16-20_powerpc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: iceweasel_3.5.16-20_s390.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: iceweasel_3.5.16-20_sparc.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1thk2k-0006sf...@franck.debian.org
Bug#695520: unblock: guile-g-wrap/1.9.14-1.1
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package guile-g-wrap I just applied the patch of #694272 which seemed straightforward and uploaded to DELAYED/3. The maintainer did not insisted and thus I assume the package is fine for testing. unblock guile-g-wrap/1.9.14-1.1 -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0.6 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.36-xenU-4814-i386 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121209170834.21944.77630.report...@mail.an3as.eu
Bug#695521: unblock: gri/2.12.23-2.2
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package gri I just applied the patch of #694275 which seemed straightforward and uploaded to DELAYED/3. The maintainer did not insisted and thus I assume the package is fine for testing. unblock gri/2.12.23-2.2 -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0.6 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.36-xenU-4814-i386 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121209171018.22005.93107.report...@mail.an3as.eu
Processed: Re: tpu: dotlrn/2.5.0+dfsg-6+wheezy3
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 681016 + confirmed Bug #681016 [release.debian.org] unblock: dotlrn/2.5.0+dfsg-6+wheezy2 Added tag(s) confirmed. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 681016: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=681016 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.1355081450494.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: Re: tpu: dotlrn/2.5.0+dfsg-6+wheezy3
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 681016 tpu: dotlrn/2.5.0+dfsg-6+wheezy3 Bug #681016 [release.debian.org] unblock: dotlrn/2.5.0+dfsg-6+wheezy2 Changed Bug title to 'tpu: dotlrn/2.5.0+dfsg-6+wheezy3' from 'unblock: dotlrn/2.5.0+dfsg-6+wheezy2' > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 681016: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=681016 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.1355081495676.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#682906: unblock: python-defaults/2.7.3-2
Hi Scott,
First, a disclaimer: I'm not a python expert or a member of the
release team, so please take anything I say with a grain of salt.
This review is mostly meant to help get this unstuck.
Scott Kitterman wrote:
> - Match the version number for python and python2.7.3. Although this is
>costmetic, it does cause confusion.
This is why the unblock is blocked by #683053, right?
> - Matches the feature set in squeeze between dh_python2 and dh_python3. It
>would be difficult for backporters, derivatives, and third party vendors to
>keep straight which did what with a skewed feature set. This is better
>avoided.
The diff is (including changelog and tests)
45 files changed, 466 insertions(+), 205 deletions(-)
including
dh_python2 | 52 +---
As we've seen shebang normalization is not without complications. So
at this stage in the freeze, this wouldn't be the usual candidate for
an unblock.
On the other hand:
(1) The impact is mostly at build time for rbuilddeps, and this
change has been in sid for half a year already. Any damage it
causes has probably already been done. :)
(2) Worse, most packages are built in unstable and only migrate to
testing later, except for tpu, spu, and security uploads. Some
source packages could be relying on the effect of this upload
already and in that case _not_ migrating would just make trouble
for stable maintenance and security updates.
(3) On the bright side, it's had half a year of testing.
So I am (reluctantly) in favor of including most of these changes
in wheezy, at least in principle.
On to the diff.
[...]
> --- python-defaults-2.7.3~rc2/debian/control 2012-06-05 22:59:07.0
> -0400
> +++ python-defaults-2.7.3/debian/control 2012-07-26 18:26:10.0
> -0400
> @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
> Package: python
> Architecture: all
> Priority: standard
> -Depends: ${misc:Depends}, python2.7 (>= 2.7.3~rc2-1~), python-minimal (=
> ${binary:Version})
> +Depends: ${misc:Depends}, python2.7 (>= 2.7.3-1~), python-minimal (=
> ${binary:Version})
[... etc ...]
> -Depends: ${misc:Depends}, python (= ${binary:Version}), python2.7-dbg (>=
> 2.7.3~rc2-1~)
> +Depends: ${misc:Depends}, python (= ${binary:Version}), python2.7-dbg (>=
> 2.7.3-1~)
Not currently satisfied by python2.7 in wheezy. Would a tpu upload
that makes the other changes but leaves this one out make sense to
you?
Then the bulk of this upload could cleanly migrate to wheezy and the
python2.7 update could be considered separately and still could happen
if it seems appropriate.
> --- python-defaults-2.7.3~rc2/debian/python-policy.sgml 2012-06-05
> 23:07:12.0 -0400
> +++ python-defaults-2.7.3/debian/python-policy.sgml 2012-07-26
> 18:26:10.0 -0400
> @@ -330,7 +330,7 @@
>
>
> /usr/share/python/runtime.d/*.rtremove: these are called when
> - a runtime is installed or stops being supported. The first
> + a runtime is removed or stops being supported. The first
Sure.
[...]
> --- python-defaults-2.7.3~rc2/debian/pyversions.py2012-06-05
> 22:58:56.0 -0400
> +++ python-defaults-2.7.3/debian/pyversions.py2012-07-26
> 18:26:10.0 -0400
> @@ -110,7 +110,8 @@
> else:
> return _unsupported_versions
>
> -_supported_versions = None
> +_supported_versions = ["python%s" % ver for ver in \
> + os.environ.get('DEBPYTHON_SUPPORTED', '').split()]
That's
* pyversions, dh_python2, pycompile: allow to override system's list of
supported Python versions via DEBPYTHON_SUPPORTED and default Python
version via DEBPYTHON_DEFAULT env. variables
Do any packages in wheezy use these envvars? What will happen if they
are rebuilt against python-defaults from wheezy?
[...]
> --- python-defaults-2.7.3~rc2/debpython/depends.py2012-06-05
> 22:58:56.0 -0400
> +++ python-defaults-2.7.3/debpython/depends.py2012-07-26
> 18:26:10.0 -0400
[...]
> @@ -94,11 +94,13 @@
> tpl = 'python-dbg' if dbgpkg else 'python'
> minv = pub_vers[0]
> maxv = pub_vers[-1]
> -if dbgpkg:
> -tpl2 = 'python%d.%d-dbg'
> -else:
> -tpl2 = 'python%d.%d'
> -self.depend(' | '.join(tpl2 % i for i in debsorted(pub_vers)))
> +# generating "python2.X | python2.Y | python2.Z" dependencies
> +# disabled (see #625740):
> +#if dbgpkg:
> +#tpl2 = 'python%d.%d-dbg'
> +#else:
> +#tpl2 = 'python%d.%d'
> +#self.depend(' | '.join(tpl2 % i for i in debsorted(pub_vers)))
If I understand #625740 correctly, without this change, dh_python2
generates "python2.6 | python2.7" dependencies which apt (sometimes?)
takes as defaulting to python2.6. I think this change should be
included in wheezy.
[...]
>
Bug#695521: marked as done (unblock: gri/2.12.23-2.2)
Your message dated Sun, 09 Dec 2012 20:59:26 + with message-id <1355086766.19225.46.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org> and subject line Re: Bug#695521: unblock: gri/2.12.23-2.2 has caused the Debian Bug report #695521, regarding unblock: gri/2.12.23-2.2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 695521: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=695521 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package gri I just applied the patch of #694275 which seemed straightforward and uploaded to DELAYED/3. The maintainer did not insisted and thus I assume the package is fine for testing. unblock gri/2.12.23-2.2 -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0.6 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.36-xenU-4814-i386 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On Sun, 2012-12-09 at 18:10 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > Please unblock package gri > > I just applied the patch of #694275 which seemed straightforward and > uploaded to DELAYED/3. The maintainer did not insisted and thus I > assume the package is fine for testing. Unblocked. Regards, Adam--- End Message ---
Bug#694573: unblock: jackd2/1.9.8~dfsg.4+20120529git007cdc37-5
Steven Chamberlain writes: > On 09/12/12 09:26, Niels Thykier wrote: >> On 2012-11-28 00:12, Adrian Knoth wrote: >>> [...] >>> unblock jackd2/1.9.8~dfsg.4+20120529git007cdc37-5 >> [...] >> There is a build failure on kfreebsd-amd64 stalling the migration to >> testing. Could you please have a look at it and look at solving it >> (even if that is imply nagging some buildd people for a give-back)? > > Hi Christoph, > > Please could you give back jackd2 to the kfreebsd-amd64 buildds... > > It seems to have hung during the waf build, which happens about 25% of > the time. On the way Regards Christoph -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87mwxm3ocs@mitoraj.siccegge.de
Bug#682906: unblock: python-defaults/2.7.3-2
[Jonathan Nieder, 2012-12-09]
> [...]
> > --- python-defaults-2.7.3~rc2/debian/pyversions.py 2012-06-05
> > 22:58:56.0 -0400
> > +++ python-defaults-2.7.3/debian/pyversions.py 2012-07-26
> > 18:26:10.0 -0400
> > @@ -110,7 +110,8 @@
> > else:
> > return _unsupported_versions
> >
> > -_supported_versions = None
> > +_supported_versions = ["python%s" % ver for ver in \
> > + os.environ.get('DEBPYTHON_SUPPORTED', '').split()]
>
> That's
>
> * pyversions, dh_python2, pycompile: allow to override system's list of
> supported Python versions via DEBPYTHON_SUPPORTED and default Python
> version via DEBPYTHON_DEFAULT env. variables
>
> Do any packages in wheezy use these envvars? What will happen if they
> are rebuilt against python-defaults from wheezy?
packages are not using it yet. Once they do, they should use it for
tests only. Wheezy administrators will be able to easily re-add support
for Python 2.4 thanks to these envvars (rebuilding one package to add
2.4 symlinks should be much easier and safer with envvar than with
changing list of supported versions system-wide)
> > --- python-defaults-2.7.3~rc2/debpython/pydist.py 2012-06-05
> > 22:58:56.0 -0400
> > +++ python-defaults-2.7.3/debpython/pydist.py 2012-07-26
> > 18:26:10.0 -0400
> [...]
> > @@ -41,7 +42,7 @@
> > ;\s*
> > (?PPEP386)?# PEP-386 mode
> > \s*
> > -(?Ps/.*)? # translator rules
> > +(?P(?:s|tr|y).*)? # translator rules
> > )?
>
> Do source packages in wheezy use this feature?
no (sadly, it looks like I'm the only one who includes *.pydist files in
packages)
> [...]
> > --- python-defaults-2.7.3~rc2/Makefile 2012-06-05 22:58:56.0
> > -0400
> > +++ python-defaults-2.7.3/Makefile 2012-07-26 18:26:10.0 -0400
> > @@ -30,6 +30,9 @@
> > %.1: %.rst
> > rst2man $< > $@
> >
> > +%.html: %.rst
> > + rst2html $< > $@
>
> Doesn't seem necessary for wheezy.
it's not used at build time
> [...]
> > --- python-defaults-2.7.3~rc2/pydist/dist_fallback 2012-06-05
> > 22:58:56.0 -0400
> > +++ python-defaults-2.7.3/pydist/dist_fallback 2012-07-26
> > 18:26:10.0 -0400
> > @@ -2,7 +2,9 @@
> > setuptools python-pkg-resources
> > wsgiref python (>= 2.5) | python-wsgiref
> > argparse python (>= 2.7) | python-argparse
> > +pil python-imaging
> > AddOns python-peak.util
> > +BatchModify trac-batchmodify
> [etc]
> > --- python-defaults-2.7.3~rc2/pydist/generate_fallback_list.py
> > 2012-06-05 22:58:56.0 -0400
> > +++ python-defaults-2.7.3/pydist/generate_fallback_list.py 2012-07-26
> > 18:26:10.0 -0400
> > @@ -72,4 +72,6 @@
> > fp.write('setuptools python-pkg-resources\n')
> > fp.write('wsgiref python (>= 2.5) | python-wsgiref\n')
> > fp.write('argparse python (>= 2.7) | python-argparse\n')
> > +# wasn't recognized due to .pth file (egg-info is in PIL/ and not in
> > *-packages/)
> > +fp.write('pil python-imaging\n')
>
> Am I correct in guessing these are needed in wheezy?
yes, at least one package was depending on the pil line, the rest is
just an update (fallback list is not generated at every build as it
requires network connection to download Contents file)
[...]
> Thanks for including tests along with the fixes. \o/
you should see what SQLAlchemy author does - there are over 100 KiB of
pure Python unit tests (for almost every bug reported) in sqlalchemy
0.7.9 (for which I still didn't send unblock request - I'll do it once
0.6.9 update for Squeeze is ready - I will need to convince you upstream
author is very sane in both cases)
--
Piotr Ożarowski Debian GNU/Linux Developer
www.ozarowski.pl www.griffith.cc www.debian.org
GPG Fingerprint: 1D2F A898 58DA AF62 1786 2DF7 AEF6 F1A2 A745 7645
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Re: emacsen-common 2.0.4 - acceptable for wheezy?
(Release team: please see the end of this message in particular...) intrigeri writes: > I removed a bit of the dust accumulated on my elisp skills and > reviewed the proposed changes. They look sane. > (Disclaimer: I'm not a release team member.) > > I've tested the proposed patch with emacs24 on Wheezy, and the diff > between the resulting load-path's (patched vs. unpatched) looks good: > /etc/emacs and /usr/local are now indeed listed before the add-ons > directories. That's great -- thanks. > It still looks like magic to me how the add-ons directories end up in > load-path at all, given it looks like we remove them in > debian-run-directories, immediately after letting the startup hooks > add them, but still, they do end up where they should, so I guess I'm > missing some bits of the Emacs startup big picture and I don't worry > about it :) Right. I believe newer versions of Emacs automatically add directories in some situations. As I recently mentioned elsewhere, I think it might be worth taking some time to review the way we handle the load-path in light of those changes, but that probably can (and should) wait until after Wheezy. >> +Thanks to Hendrik Tews for the report and Kevin >> +Ryde for an initial suggested patch -- posted to >> +#454778. (closes: #676424) > > Shouldn't #454778 be closed by this upload too, then? Possibly. Also... Release team: at this point, please hold off on 2.0.4 -- another bug has been discovered that should probably also be included in wheezy: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=693472 I'm waiting to see if Sébastien has time to review my fix, and then I'll generate a 2.0.5 and resubmit. And when I submit 2.0.5 here, should I include the debdiff against 2.0.4, or the full debdiff against what's currently in wheezy (i.e including the 2.0.4 and 2.0.5 diffs)? Thanks -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87r4mybzg0@trouble.defaultvalue.org
Re: magpierss: #694052
On Sun, 2012-12-09 at 12:51 -0200, Marcelo Jorge Vieira wrote: > I intend to fix #694052 [0], what do you think about it? [...] > -Conflicts: magpierss (<= 0.72-5) > -Replaces: magpierss (<= 0.72-5) > +Conflicts: magpierss (<< 0.72-6) > +Replaces: magpierss (<< 0.72-6) That sounds okay, but please file a pu bug with a debdiff attached (and wait for a final ack before uploading); thanks. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1355094293.19225.48.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Bug#691647: unblock: schroot/1.6.4-1
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 10:23:10AM +, Roger Leigh wrote: > On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 08:24:51PM +, Roger Leigh wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 12:53:08PM +, Roger Leigh wrote: > > > On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 12:39:28AM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote: > > > > Please unblock package schroot > > > > > > > > I have uploaded schroot 1.6.4-1 to unstable. This contains some > > > > documentation for wheezy upgrade issues, plus some fixes for > > > > serious and important bugs in wheezy: > > > > > > I had to make an additional 3 line change to fix building on > > > hurd and kfreebsd (attached) > > > > And an additional change to allow for symlinks in paths on the > > host. > > > > unblock schroot/1.6.4-3 > > I do have a further portablity patch for kfreebsd: > > http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=buildd-tools/schroot.git;a=commitdiff;h=73f9ab7ff14c348c262813fdd454132edf45ef5a > http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=buildd-tools/schroot.git;a=commitdiff;h=9bc4e6abef18fcb16ba8bf579dfa6946657cbfac > > but I was holding off on uploading it without any feedback > regarding the above unblock request. > > This patch is needed to allow sbuild to work on kfreebsd. > Without it, there are no device nodes (fatal) and no scratch > space for building. I've now uploaded this additional bugfix, patch follows. All of the changes since 1.6.3-1 in testing to 1.6.4-1 in unstable are here: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=buildd-tools/schroot.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/schroot-1.6 If some of the included changes here are too big, I'll be happy to make an upload of a subset of the changes to testing-proposed-updates, but I do need some feedback in order to start doing that. There are a number of bugs fixed here: 692213: essential for kFreeBSD 686148,691694: security issue #688304: cosmetic but annoying #689078: broken environment; breaks buildd setup scripts; not critical, but breaks interface. Required refactoring to fix, which results in the bulk of the diff #691376: mounts wrong filesystem on recovery. And it also fixes a number of other issues including locking and upgrade notes. Regards, Roger diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index 03decda..8ecb116 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +schroot (1.6.4-4) unstable; urgency=low + + * schroot: Add sbuild profile fstab file for freebsd +(Closes: #692213). This mounts /dev, /dev/fd and /build. + + -- Roger Leigh Sat, 03 Nov 2012 15:19:16 + + schroot (1.6.4-3) unstable; urgency=low * schroot-mount canonicalises both the base path and full diff --git a/etc/profile-templates/sbuild/freebsd/fstab b/etc/profile-templates/sbuild/freebsd/fstab new file mode 100644 index 000..778bd42 --- /dev/null +++ b/etc/profile-templates/sbuild/freebsd/fstab @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ +dev/devdevfs rw,bind 0 0 +dev/dev/fd fdescfs rw,bind 0 0 +# Mount a large scratch space for the build, so we don't use up +# space on an LVM snapshot of the chroot itself. +/var/lib/sbuild/build /build nullfs rw 0 0 -- .''`. Roger Leigh : :' : Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://people.debian.org/~rleigh/ `. `' schroot and sbuild http://alioth.debian.org/projects/buildd-tools `-GPG Public Key F33D 281D 470A B443 6756 147C 07B3 C8BC 4083 E800 schroot_1.6.3-1_1.6.4-4.debdiff.gz Description: Binary data
Bug#695520: marked as done (unblock: guile-g-wrap/1.9.14-1.1)
Your message dated Mon, 10 Dec 2012 08:13:49 +0100 with message-id <50c58bad.6070...@thykier.net> and subject line Re: Bug#695520: unblock: guile-g-wrap/1.9.14-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #695520, regarding unblock: guile-g-wrap/1.9.14-1.1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 695520: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=695520 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package guile-g-wrap I just applied the patch of #694272 which seemed straightforward and uploaded to DELAYED/3. The maintainer did not insisted and thus I assume the package is fine for testing. unblock guile-g-wrap/1.9.14-1.1 -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0.6 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.36-xenU-4814-i386 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On 2012-12-09 18:08, Andreas Tille wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: unblock > > Please unblock package guile-g-wrap > > I just applied the patch of #694272 which seemed straightforward and > uploaded to DELAYED/3. The maintainer did not insisted and thus I > assume the package is fine for testing. > > unblock guile-g-wrap/1.9.14-1.1 > > [...] Unblocked, thanks. ~Niels--- End Message ---
