Processing of zope-cmf_1.3.3-2_i386.changes

2005-08-18 Thread Archive Administrator
zope-cmf_1.3.3-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  zope-cmf_1.3.3-2.dsc
  zope-cmf_1.3.3-2.diff.gz
  zope-cmf_1.3.3-2_all.deb
  zope-cmfcalendar_1.3.3-2_all.deb
  zope-cmfdefault_1.3.3-2_all.deb
  zope-cmftopic_1.3.3-2_all.deb
  zope-cmfcore_1.3.3-2_all.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



zope-cmf_1.3.3-2_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2005-08-18 Thread Debian Installer

Accepted:
zope-cmf_1.3.3-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/z/zope-cmf/zope-cmf_1.3.3-2.diff.gz
zope-cmf_1.3.3-2.dsc
  to pool/main/z/zope-cmf/zope-cmf_1.3.3-2.dsc
zope-cmf_1.3.3-2_all.deb
  to pool/main/z/zope-cmf/zope-cmf_1.3.3-2_all.deb
zope-cmfcalendar_1.3.3-2_all.deb
  to pool/main/z/zope-cmf/zope-cmfcalendar_1.3.3-2_all.deb
zope-cmfcore_1.3.3-2_all.deb
  to pool/main/z/zope-cmf/zope-cmfcore_1.3.3-2_all.deb
zope-cmfdefault_1.3.3-2_all.deb
  to pool/main/z/zope-cmf/zope-cmfdefault_1.3.3-2_all.deb
zope-cmftopic_1.3.3-2_all.deb
  to pool/main/z/zope-cmf/zope-cmftopic_1.3.3-2_all.deb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Closing bugs: 214341 225770 250142 


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processing of zope-cmfworkflow_0.4.2-5_i386.changes

2005-08-18 Thread Archive Administrator
zope-cmfworkflow_0.4.2-5_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  zope-cmfworkflow_0.4.2-5.dsc
  zope-cmfworkflow_0.4.2-5.diff.gz
  zope-cmfworkflow_0.4.2-5_all.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processing of zope-ldap_1.1.0-4_i386.changes

2005-08-18 Thread Archive Administrator
zope-ldap_1.1.0-4_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  zope-ldap_1.1.0-4.dsc
  zope-ldap_1.1.0-4.diff.gz
  zope-ldap_1.1.0-4_all.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processing of zope-mysqlda_2.0.8-3_i386.changes

2005-08-18 Thread Archive Administrator
zope-mysqlda_2.0.8-3_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  zope-mysqlda_2.0.8-3.dsc
  zope-mysqlda_2.0.8-3.diff.gz
  zope-mysqlda_2.0.8-3_all.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



zope-ldap_1.1.0-4_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2005-08-18 Thread Debian Installer

Accepted:
zope-ldap_1.1.0-4.diff.gz
  to pool/main/z/zope-ldap/zope-ldap_1.1.0-4.diff.gz
zope-ldap_1.1.0-4.dsc
  to pool/main/z/zope-ldap/zope-ldap_1.1.0-4.dsc
zope-ldap_1.1.0-4_all.deb
  to pool/main/z/zope-ldap/zope-ldap_1.1.0-4_all.deb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Closing bugs: 225768 287711 


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



zope-cmfworkflow_0.4.2-5_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2005-08-18 Thread Debian Installer

Accepted:
zope-cmfworkflow_0.4.2-5.diff.gz
  to pool/main/z/zope-cmfworkflow/zope-cmfworkflow_0.4.2-5.diff.gz
zope-cmfworkflow_0.4.2-5.dsc
  to pool/main/z/zope-cmfworkflow/zope-cmfworkflow_0.4.2-5.dsc
zope-cmfworkflow_0.4.2-5_all.deb
  to pool/main/z/zope-cmfworkflow/zope-cmfworkflow_0.4.2-5_all.deb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Closing bugs: 214368 


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



zope-mysqlda_2.0.8-3_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2005-08-18 Thread Debian Installer

Accepted:
zope-mysqlda_2.0.8-3.diff.gz
  to pool/main/z/zope-mysqlda/zope-mysqlda_2.0.8-3.diff.gz
zope-mysqlda_2.0.8-3.dsc
  to pool/main/z/zope-mysqlda/zope-mysqlda_2.0.8-3.dsc
zope-mysqlda_2.0.8-3_all.deb
  to pool/main/z/zope-mysqlda/zope-mysqlda_2.0.8-3_all.deb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Closing bugs: 161581 213983 223244 


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processing of mindterm_1.2.1-11_i386.changes

2005-08-18 Thread Archive Administrator
mindterm_1.2.1-11_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  mindterm_1.2.1-11.dsc
  mindterm_1.2.1-11.diff.gz
  mindterm_1.2.1-11_all.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



mindterm_1.2.1-11_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2005-08-18 Thread Debian Installer

Accepted:
mindterm_1.2.1-11.diff.gz
  to pool/main/m/mindterm/mindterm_1.2.1-11.diff.gz
mindterm_1.2.1-11.dsc
  to pool/main/m/mindterm/mindterm_1.2.1-11.dsc
mindterm_1.2.1-11_all.deb
  to pool/main/m/mindterm/mindterm_1.2.1-11_all.deb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Closing bugs: 323738 


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processing of ts10_0.8.030519-1_i386.changes

2005-08-18 Thread Archive Administrator
ts10_0.8.030519-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  ts10_0.8.030519-1.dsc
  ts10_0.8.030519.orig.tar.gz
  ts10_0.8.030519-1.diff.gz
  ts10_0.8.030519-1_i386.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#181220: marked as done (wrong assumption on char signedness)

2005-08-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 Aug 2005 09:02:30 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#181220: fixed in ts10 0.8.030519-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Feb 2003 14:16:16 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Feb 16 08:16:15 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from moutvdom.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.249] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18kPaY-0001S3-00; Sun, 16 Feb 2003 08:16:15 -0600
Received: from [212.227.126.223] (helo=mrvdomng.kundenserver.de)
by moutvdom.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1)
id 18kPaY-0001Bb-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 16 Feb 2003 15:16:14 +0100
Received: from [80.138.129.29] (helo=tau)
by mrvdomng.kundenserver.de with smtp (Exim 3.35 #1)
id 18kPaX-0006tc-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 16 Feb 2003 15:16:14 +0100
From: Gerhard Tonn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: wrong assumption on char signedness
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 15:22:31 +0100
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.1.99]
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.2 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: ts10
Version:  0.8.021004-1
Severity: important

Hi,
char is per default unsigned on arm, powerpc and s390. There are several 
warnings, e.g.

cpu_main.c:306: warning: comparison is always false due to limited range of 
data type

during build of your package that might cause a runtime error. Please check

http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=ts10&ver=0.8.021004-1&arch=s390&stamp=1042535353&file=log&as=raw

for details.

Thanks,
Gerhard

---
Received: (at 181220-close) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Aug 2005 16:09:31 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 18 09:09:31 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E5mqc-0007EU-00; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 09:02:30 -0700
From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#181220: fixed in ts10 0.8.030519-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 09:02:30 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: ts10
Source-Version: 0.8.030519-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
ts10, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

ts10_0.8.030519-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/t/ts10/ts10_0.8.030519-1.diff.gz
ts10_0.8.030519-1.dsc
  to pool/main/t/ts10/ts10_0.8.030519-1.dsc
ts10_0.8.030519-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/t/ts10/ts10_0.8.030519-1_i386.deb
ts10_0.8.030519.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/t/ts10/ts10_0.8.030519.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated ts10 package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 17:38:58 +0200
Source: ts10
Binary: ts10
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.8.030519-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 ts10   - Emulators for PDP-10, PDP-11, VAX
Closes: 181220 297849
Changes: 
 ts10 (0.8.030519-1) unstable; urgency=high
 .
   * QA upload.
   * New upstream release.
   * Switch to dpatch.
   * Fix build failure with gcc 4.0.  Closes: #297849.
 - invalid-lvalue.dpatch: Casts and conditionals are no longer accepted
   as lvalues.
 - name-clash.dpatch: A static global variable is 

Bug#297849: marked as done (ts10: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): static declaration of 'dataMode' follows non-static declaration)

2005-08-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 Aug 2005 09:02:30 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#297849: fixed in ts10 0.8.030519-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Mar 2005 09:25:12 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 03 01:25:12 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from c223012.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [213.39.223.12] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D6ma0-0004Yz-00; Thu, 03 Mar 2005 01:25:12 -0800
Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.44)
id 1D6nWK-0005NL-9h; Thu, 03 Mar 2005 11:25:28 +0100
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ts10: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): static declaration of 'dataMode' follows 
non-static declaration
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 11:25:28 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE,
UPPERCASE_25_50 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: ts10
Severity: normal
Tags: patch

When building 'ts10' on amd64 with gcc-4.0,
I get the following error:

gcc -g -O3 -c -DHAVE_SIGACTION -DDEBUG -DOPT_XADR  -I.. -I. cpu_extend.c
cpu_extend.c:235: error: static declaration of 'dataMode' follows non-static 
declaration
../pdp10/defs.h:477: error: previous declaration of 'dataMode' was here
make[2]: *** [cpu_extend.o] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/ts10-0.8.021004/pdp10'

With the attached patch 'ts10' can be compiled
on amd64 using gcc-4.0.

Regards
Andreas Jochens

diff -urN ../tmp-orig/ts10-0.8.021004/pdp10/cpu_extend.c ./pdp10/cpu_extend.c
--- ../tmp-orig/ts10-0.8.021004/pdp10/cpu_extend.c  2002-08-12 
19:35:34.0 +0200
+++ ./pdp10/cpu_extend.c2005-03-02 18:27:20.0 +0100
@@ -232,6 +232,7 @@
 
 static int18 ext_Offset; // Offset Register
 
+#define dataMode dataMode_cpu_extend
 static int dataMode;
 
 extern int30 (*KX10_CalcEffAddr)(int30, int30, int);
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/ts10-0.8.021004/pdp11/cpu2.c ./pdp11/cpu2.c
--- ../tmp-orig/ts10-0.8.021004/pdp11/cpu2.c2002-10-04 15:03:40.0 
+0200
+++ ./pdp11/cpu2.c  2005-03-03 10:38:56.0 +0100
@@ -365,10 +365,10 @@
// Exchange all registers R0-R5 with 
R0'-R5'
for (idx = 0; idx < 6; idx++) {
GPREG(idx, oldSet) = REGW(idx);
-   REGW(idx) = GPREG(idx, newSet);
+   p11->wkRegs[idx] = GPREG(idx, 
newSet);
}
}
-   SP  = STKREG(newMode);
+   p11->wkRegs[6] /* SP */  = STKREG(newMode);
PSW = newPSW & ~CC_ALL;
CC  = newPSW & CC_ALL;
 
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/ts10-0.8.021004/pdp11/cpu_eis.c ./pdp11/cpu_eis.c
--- ../tmp-orig/ts10-0.8.021004/pdp11/cpu_eis.c 2002-09-30 16:29:18.0 
+0200
+++ ./pdp11/cpu_eis.c   2005-03-02 18:30:46.0 +0100
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@
if ((int16)dst == 0) CC |= CC_Z;
 
// Write results back.
-   REGW(srcSpec) = dst;
+   p11->wkRegs[srcSpec] = dst;
 
 #ifdef DEBUG
if (dbg_Check(DBG_TRACE|DBG_DATA))
@@ -106,8 +106,8 @@
if (dst == 0) CC |= CC_Z;
 
// Write results back.
-   REGW(srcSpec) = dst >> 16;
-   REGW(srcSpec | 1) = dst;
+   p11->wkRegs[srcSpec] = dst >> 16;
+   p11->wkRegs[srcSpec | 1] = dst;
 
 #ifdef DEBUG
if (dbg_Check(DBG_TRACE|DBG_DATA))
@@ -135,8 +135,8 @@
CC |= CC_C;
 
// Write results back
-   UREGW(srcSpec) = prod >> 16;
-   UREGW(srcSpec | 1) = prod;
+   p11->wkRegs[srcSpec] = prod >> 16;
+   p11->wkRegs[srcSpec | 1] = prod;
 
 #ifdef DEBUG
if (dbg_Check(DBG_TRACE|DBG_DATA))
@@ -173,8 +173,8 @@
} else {
CC_IIZZ_I(quo);
// Write results back
-   UREGW(srcSpec) = quo;
-   UREGW(srcSpec | 1) = rem;
+   p11->wkRegs[srcSpec] = quo;
+ 

ts10_0.8.030519-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2005-08-18 Thread Debian Installer

Accepted:
ts10_0.8.030519-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/t/ts10/ts10_0.8.030519-1.diff.gz
ts10_0.8.030519-1.dsc
  to pool/main/t/ts10/ts10_0.8.030519-1.dsc
ts10_0.8.030519-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/t/ts10/ts10_0.8.030519-1_i386.deb
ts10_0.8.030519.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/t/ts10/ts10_0.8.030519.orig.tar.gz
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Closing bugs: 181220 297849 


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#295147: marked as done (Library package of older version without reverse-depends)

2005-08-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 Aug 2005 18:56:59 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Feb 2005 23:32:04 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Feb 13 15:32:04 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 220pc220.sshunet.nl (mordor.wolffelaar.nl) [145.97.220.220] 
(Debian-exim)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D0TDg-0001pX-00; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 15:32:04 -0800
Received: from jeroen by mordor.wolffelaar.nl with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1D0TDf-0007i4-Qp
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 00:32:03 +0100
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 00:32:03 +0100
From: Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Library package of older version without reverse-depends
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.2
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: qt-embedded
Severity: serious

As per [1], this is an older version of qte, and the package has no
reverse-dependencies.

IMHO it's atm unsuiteable for release in a stable Debian.

--Jeroen

[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2005/02/msg5.html

-- 
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl

---
Received: (at 295147-done) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Aug 2005 16:57:22 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 18 09:57:22 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.irb.hr [161.53.22.8] (UNKNOWN)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E5nhi-00022y-00; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 09:57:22 -0700
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (diziet.irb.hr [161.53.22.31])
by mail.irb.hr (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id j7IGuxHb022230;
Thu, 18 Aug 2005 18:56:59 +0200
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id j7IGuxY4005949;
Thu, 18 Aug 2005 18:56:59 +0200
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j7IGuxwg005947;
Thu, 18 Aug 2005 18:56:59 +0200
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 18:56:59 +0200
From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Removed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.8
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.31
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,ONEWORD autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 5

qt-embedded and qt-embedded-free were removed from Debian in March.
Please see  for details.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#266164: marked as done (qt-embedded-free: FTBFS with gcc-3.4: there are no arguments to `clear' that depend on a template parameter, so a declaration of `clear' must be available)

2005-08-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 Aug 2005 18:56:59 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Aug 2004 22:32:24 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 16 15:32:24 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from b099100.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost) [62.109.99.100] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Bwq1f-0003A9-00; Mon, 16 Aug 2004 15:32:23 -0700
Received: from aj by localhost with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1BwpSC-0003gu-1t; Mon, 16 Aug 2004 23:55:44 +0200
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: qt-embedded-free: FTBFS with gcc-3.4: there are no arguments to 
`clear' that depend on a template parameter, so a declaration of `clear' must 
be available
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 23:55:44 +0200
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DRUGSPAM,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: qt-embedded-free
Severity: normal
Tags: patch

When building 'qt-embedded-free' with gcc-3.4 I get the following error:

g++ -O2 -Wpointer-arith -Wwrite-strings -Wmissing-prototypes -c -pipe -DQWS 
-fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions -I/usr/include/mysql 
-I/usr/include/postgresql -I/usr/include/postgresql/server -Wall -W 
-D_REENTRANT -fPIC -DQT_SHARED -DQT_NO_DEBUG -DQT_THREAD_SUPPORT 
-DQT_THREAD_SUPPORT -DQT_NO_CUPS -DQT_NO_NIS -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE 
-D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -DQT_BUILTIN_GIF_READER=1 -DQT_NO_STYLE_MAC 
-DQT_NO_STYLE_AQUA -DQT_NO_STYLE_CDE -DQT_NO_STYLE_MOTIFPLUS 
-DQT_NO_STYLE_INTERLACE -DQT_NO_STYLE_PLATINUM -DQT_NO_STYLE_WINDOWSXP 
-DQT_NO_STYLE_SGI -DQT_NO_STYLE_COMPACT -DQT_NO_STYLE_WINDOWS -DQT_NO_QWS_VNC 
-DQT_NO_QWS_VGA16 -DQT_NO_QWS_TRANSFORMED -DQT_NO_QWS_MACH64 
-DQT_NO_QWS_VOODOO3 -DQT_NO_QWS_MATROX -DQT_NO_QWS_SHADOWFB 
-DQT_NO_QWS_REPEATER -DQT_NO_QWS_KBDUSB -DQT_NO_QWS_MOUSE_BUS 
-I/qt-embedded-free-3.1.2/mkspecs/qws/linux-generic-g++ -I. 
-I3rdparty/freetype/src -I3rdparty/freetype/include 
-I3rdparty/freetype/builds/unix -I3rdparty/freetype2/include -I../include 
-I.moc/release-shared-mt-emb-generic/ -o 
.obj/release-shared-mt-emb-generic/allmoc.o 
.moc/release-shared-mt-emb-generic/allmoc.cpp
cc1plus: warning: command line option "-Wmissing-prototypes" is valid for 
Ada/C/ObjC/Pascal but not for C++
In file included from /qt-embedded-free-3.1.2/include/qt.h:199,
 from .moc/release-shared-mt-emb-generic/allmoc.cpp:12:
../include/qsortedlist.h: In destructor `QSortedList::~QSortedList()':
../include/qsortedlist.h:52: error: there are no arguments to `clear' that 
depend on a template parameter, so a declaration of `clear' must be available
../include/qsortedlist.h:52: error: (if you use `-fpermissive', G++ will accept 
your code, but allowing the use of an undeclared name is deprecated)
make[2]: *** [.obj/release-shared-mt-emb-generic/allmoc.o] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/qt-embedded-free-3.1.2/src'

With the attached patch 'qt-embedded-free' can be compiled using gcc-3.4.

Regards
Andreas Jochens

diff -urN ../tmp-orig/qt-embedded-free-3.1.2/src/tools/qsortedlist.h 
./src/tools/qsortedlist.h
--- ../tmp-orig/qt-embedded-free-3.1.2/src/tools/qsortedlist.h  2003-02-24 
09:29:51.0 +0100
+++ ./src/tools/qsortedlist.h   2004-08-16 21:33:09.379370281 +0200
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@
 public:
 QSortedList() {}
 QSortedList( const QSortedList &l ) : QPtrList(l) {}
-~QSortedList() { clear(); }
+~QSortedList() { this->clear(); }
 QSortedList &operator=(const QSortedList &l)
   { return (QSortedList&)QPtrList::operator=(l); }
 
diff -urN 
../tmp-orig/qt-embedded-free-3.1.2/src/embedded/qgfxtransformed_qws.cpp 
./src/embedded/qgfxtransformed_qws.cpp
--- ../tmp-orig/qt-embedded-free-3.1.2/src/embedded/qgfxtransformed_qws.cpp 
2003-02-24 09:29:57.0 +0100
+++ ./src/embedded/qgfxtransformed_qws.cpp  2004-08-16 21:32:22.081560641 
+0200
@@ -584,11 +584,11 @@
 inline int tx( int x, int y ) {
switch ( qt_trans_screen->transformation() ) {
case QTransformedScreen::Rot90:
-   return y - xoffs + yoffs;
+   return y - this->xoffs + this->yoffs;
  

Bug#249005: marked as done (qt-embedded-free: Wrong library name from QLibrary::library() method)

2005-08-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 Aug 2005 18:56:59 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 May 2004 13:20:18 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 14 06:20:18 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from apollo.praha6.net (sid) [80.250.8.130] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BOcbq-0004Xr-00; Fri, 14 May 2004 06:20:18 -0700
Received: from patrik by sid with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1BOcHM-0007lf-6K; Fri, 14 May 2004 14:59:08 +0200
Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 14:59:08 +0200
From: Patrik Modesto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: qt-embedded-free: Wrong library name from QLibrary::library() method
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.58
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux testing/unstable 2.6.5-1-686 i686
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1


--YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: qt-embedded-free
Severity: normal

Hello!

Here goes an example of the bug:

library name passed   QLibrary's mangled name
--
mytemplatelibrary libmytemplatelibrary..so
libmytemplatelibrary  liblibmytemplatelibrary..so
mytemplatelibrary.so  mytemplatelibrary.so
libmytemplatelibrary.so   libmytemplatelibrary.so

As You can see there are two dots in the mangled name. This is Qte
bug! A workaround is to pass full library name to the QLibrary class,
there is no mangling then. A path has no impact on the mangling.

HTH

Mody

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.5-1-686
Locale: LANG=3Dcs_CZ.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=3Dcs_CZ.UTF-8 (ignored: LC_ALL set to =
cs_CZ.UTF-8)

--=20
Debian testing/unstable 2.6.5-1-686 i686 GNU/Linux

--YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD4DBQFApMKbhpEhfhIEVxQRAsx3AKCr93bRaVIz4cERc9eV/9Wb1TTyeQCUCIsZ
AogcQmDMihdqYN7a3P1OZQ==
=V7fj
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4--

---
Received: (at 249005-done) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Aug 2005 16:57:22 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 18 09:57:22 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.irb.hr [161.53.22.8] (UNKNOWN)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E5nhi-00022y-00; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 09:57:22 -0700
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (diziet.irb.hr [161.53.22.31])
by mail.irb.hr (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id j7IGuxHb022230;
Thu, 18 Aug 2005 18:56:59 +0200
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id j7IGuxY4005949;
Thu, 18 Aug 2005 18:56:59 +0200
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j7IGuxwg005947;
Thu, 18 Aug 2005 18:56:59 +0200
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 18:56:59 +0200
From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Removed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.8
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.31
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,ONEWORD autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2

qt

Bug#243331: marked as done (qt-embedded-free: new upstream version available)

2005-08-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 Aug 2005 18:56:59 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Apr 2004 14:00:44 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 12 07:00:43 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from postman1.arcor-online.net (postman.arcor.de) [151.189.0.151] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BD1zP-0002Gz-00; Mon, 12 Apr 2004 07:00:43 -0700
Received: from mail.gallien.de (p508AAFFD.dip.t-dialin.net [80.138.175.253])
(authenticated bits=0)
by postman.arcor.de (8.13.0.PreAlpha4/8.13.0.PreAlpha4) with ESMTP id 
i3CE0dKA002270
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
Mon, 12 Apr 2004 16:00:41 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from asterix.gallien.de (asterix.gallien.de [192.168.1.2])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mail.gallien.de (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 5D1C327F5C; Mon, 12 Apr 2004 16:00:28 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by asterix.gallien.de (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 39BE757457; Mon, 12 Apr 2004 16:00:27 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Stefan Frank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: qt-embedded-free: new upstream version available
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.56
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 16:00:27 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1

Package: qt-embedded-free
Severity: wishlist

Hi,

according to http://www.trolltech.com/download/qt/embedded.html
the current version is 3.3.1 while we only have 3.1.2 in unstable.
I just noticed as mythtv compiled with qte segfaulted. Could be a
different problem but regardless it'd be nice to have the latest 
stable upstream version in Debian.

Bye, Stefan


-- System Information:
Debian Release: sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.5
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (ignored: LC_ALL set to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED])

---
Received: (at 243331-done) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Aug 2005 16:57:22 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 18 09:57:22 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.irb.hr [161.53.22.8] (UNKNOWN)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E5nhi-00022y-00; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 09:57:22 -0700
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (diziet.irb.hr [161.53.22.31])
by mail.irb.hr (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id j7IGuxHb022230;
Thu, 18 Aug 2005 18:56:59 +0200
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id j7IGuxY4005949;
Thu, 18 Aug 2005 18:56:59 +0200
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j7IGuxwg005947;
Thu, 18 Aug 2005 18:56:59 +0200
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 18:56:59 +0200
From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Removed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.8
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.31
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,ONEWORD autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

qt-embedded and qt-embedded-free were removed from Debian in March.
Please see  for details.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#277431: marked as done (qt-embedded: 2.3.8 is out)

2005-08-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 Aug 2005 18:56:59 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Oct 2004 23:06:27 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 19 16:06:26 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from postfix3-2.free.fr [213.228.0.169] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CK33i-0008P4-00; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 16:06:26 -0700
Received: from nanterre-1-81-57-214-146 
(nanterre-1-81-57-214-146.fbx.proxad.net [81.57.214.146])
by postfix3-2.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 235B2C082;
Wed, 20 Oct 2004 01:06:24 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from dwitch by nanterre-1-81-57-214-146 with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1CK33U-0002wM-RV; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 01:06:12 +0200
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 01:06:09 +0200
From: Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: qt-embedded: 2.3.8 is out
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.99.6
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Sender: Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: qt-embedded
Severity: normal

At ftp://ftp.trolltech.com/qt/source/

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i586)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.23-k6+preempt+acl
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

-- 
Yann Dirson<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |
Debian-related: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |   Support Debian GNU/Linux:
|  Freedom, Power, Stability, Gratis
 http://ydirson.free.fr/| Check 

---
Received: (at 277431-done) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Aug 2005 16:57:22 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 18 09:57:22 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.irb.hr [161.53.22.8] (UNKNOWN)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E5nhi-00022y-00; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 09:57:22 -0700
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (diziet.irb.hr [161.53.22.31])
by mail.irb.hr (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id j7IGuxHb022230;
Thu, 18 Aug 2005 18:56:59 +0200
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id j7IGuxY4005949;
Thu, 18 Aug 2005 18:56:59 +0200
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j7IGuxwg005947;
Thu, 18 Aug 2005 18:56:59 +0200
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 18:56:59 +0200
From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Removed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.8
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.31
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,ONEWORD autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 4

qt-embedded and qt-embedded-free were removed from Debian in March.
Please see  for details.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#323820: manpages-ru: Russian man pages are only shown in ru_RU.KOI8-R locale

2005-08-18 Thread Stepan Golosunov
Package: manpages-ru
Version: 0.7d-3
Severity: important
Tags: patch

In ru_RU.UTF-8 and ru_RU.CP1251 locales man mv is shown in English.
Moving man pages from /usr/share/man/ru_RU.KOI8-R/ to /usr/share/man/ru/
solves the problem.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686
Locale: LANG=ru_RU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ru_RU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

-- no debconf information
--- debian/rules.orig   2005-08-18 21:28:50.295640240 +0500
+++ debian/rules2005-08-18 21:28:17.134681000 +0500
@@ -21,10 +21,10 @@
dh_installdirs
 
# Add here commands to install the package into debian/.
-   dh_install man? usr/share/man/ru_RU.KOI8-R
+   dh_install man? usr/share/man/ru
 
# Move environ(5) to environ(7).
-   cd debian/manpages-ru/usr/share/man/ru_RU.KOI8-R \
+   cd debian/manpages-ru/usr/share/man/ru \
&& sed '/^\.TH/s/5/7/' man5/environ.5 > man7/environ.7 \
&& rm man5/environ.5
 


Bug#323820: manpages-ru: Russian man pages are only shown in ru_RU.KOI8-R locale

2005-08-18 Thread Matej Vela
(manpages-ru is currently orphaned, so I'm Cc-ing debian-l10n-russian
for help.)

On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 10:16:16PM +0500, Stepan Golosunov wrote:
> Package: manpages-ru
> Version: 0.7d-3
> Severity: important
> Tags: patch
> 
> In ru_RU.UTF-8 and ru_RU.CP1251 locales man mv is shown in English.
> Moving man pages from /usr/share/man/ru_RU.KOI8-R/ to /usr/share/man/ru/
> solves the problem.

But they are then shown in the wrong character set, are they not?

If UTF-8 and CP1251 are widely used, perhaps we should supply pages in
all three character sets?

Thanks,

Matej


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



A quick question about your site...

2005-08-18 Thread E-Commerce Solutions HQ
Hi,

I've just set up a new site about e-commerce solutions, and when I was 
researching the subject, I found your site. I think your site has 
got some fantastic content, and it would be a great resource for 
my visitors. Would it be alright if I traded links with you?

I was so excited about the possible links, that I went ahead and 
added a link to your site to my Resource Directory.

Is that OK with you? The site address is 
http://www.ecommercesolutions-hq.com and the link is on 
http://www.ecommercesolutions-hq.com/authorizenet

If this is alright, can I ask a favor? Will you give me a link back on 
your site? I'd really appreciate it!

As you can imagine, the list that I have created of all of the sites 
I visit is really long, and some errors sometimes creep in. If you have 
received this message and it is not relevant to you, then please accept
my sincere apologies. I will remove you from my list immediately.

If you want to chat about this further, then please drop me an email, and
we'll see where we go from there.

Warm regards and best wishes,

from Doug.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

P.S. When you do link back, there's some suggested code to use at
http://www.ecommercesolutions-hq.com/links/addlink.html//

Bug#197127: Lfie Expirecene Deeergs

2005-08-18 Thread Corine Bowling
Good day sir,

A Genuine College Degree in 2 weeks !  1-206-350-5982 < - ccall n0ww !


Have you ever thought that the only thing stopping you from a great job and 
better pay was a few letters behind your name?  

Well now you can get them!

BA   BSc     MAMScMBA   PhD

Within 2 weeks!  No Study Required! 100% Verifiable!


These are real, genuine non accredited degrees that include Bachelors, Masters 
and Doctorate degrees.  

They are verifiable and student records and transcripts are also available. 

This little known secret has been kept quiet for years.  The opportunity exists 
due to a legal loophole allowing some established colleges to award degrees at 
their discretion.

With all of the attention that this news has been generating, I wouldn't be 
surprised to see this loophole closed very soon.  Order yours today.  Just call 
the number below.  You'll thank me later.



1-206-350-5982



Frankie Kilgore






I am back to work today and compared to yesterday 100 percent better. I came in 
yesterday feeling a little sick to my stomach but just put it off to sour 
stomach thinking nothing about it, I mean I have worked with worse. As the day 
progressed I noticed my head was hurting more and more, then the lights were 
getting brighter, at one point I must have looked like the hunchback of Notre 
dame. I had several of my counter parts coming over concerned about how I was 
feeling. Several of the folks I have worked with have learned the look on my 
face and knew what was happening. Now don't get me wrong I have worked through 
many a migraine and was going to work through this one. This migraine had a 
different idea though, this was going to be one of those that sideline me. I 
felt it welling up in my stomach and ran to the bathroom to worship the ole 
porcelain crown. I came back after a few minutes and a quick mouthwash back to 
the desk. My compadre ask what happened so I told her and I was promptly 
ordered home. After checking out with the bosses and making sure there would be 
no trouble for her to stay on my shift I left. I took much longer to get home 
then normal due to the fact that I stopped a few times to holler for Ralph! I 
walked into the house and straight to the bedroom where it was Dark and aid 
down when my stomach had settled down some I took my meds and was out for a 
little while. Now if you are one of the lucky ones that do not suffer from 
migraines the only thing I can think of to let you know the pain that one can 
feel from it is to take your little toe and close it in a vice till it is the 
equivalent of mashed taters. Folks having migraines at time lose all track of 
what they are doing, they have been known to put their heads through walls and 
more trying to get rid of the pain. While the best known cure on the market is 
a product called Imatrex, I am one of the few that are allergic to it. I have 
to use other measures and if I do not want to take narcotics like then I must 
suffer through it. One of the bad thinks is you get sensitive to light then any 
movement makes you nauseous, any noise sounds are magnified ten fold. All you 
want to do is get in a dark corner away from the world and hide. Now the next 
day when you wake up especially when you have had a rough one like last night 
you fell almost hung over, really groggy. I woke thought and felt much better 
(then I did yesterday) and yes hung over I came to work and had a fairly normal 
day here at the ole station. 3


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#88107: marked as done (hanterm doesn't start on PPC)

2005-08-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 Aug 2005 23:53:59 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line hanterm doesn't start on PPC
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Mar 2001 12:25:13 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 01 06:25:13 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (home.com) [:::211.196.229.116] 
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14YS8r-0003Gs-00; Thu, 01 Mar 2001 06:25:09 -0600
Received: (qmail 6909 invoked by uid 1000); 1 Mar 2001 12:24:21 -
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2001 21:24:21 +0900
From: Joongul Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: hanterm doesn't start on PPC
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.12i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: hanterm
Version: 3.3.1p18-1

When I type "hanterm &" on an xterm, it gives 

hanterm: fatal pty error 23 (errno=22) on tty /dev/pts/4 

and exits. Compiling from source doesn't work, either... 

I am using testing(woody) distribution on PPC (G3 pismo), with kernel version
2.2.18 and libc6 2.2.1-1.

-- 
Joongul Lee
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

---
Received: (at 88107-done) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Aug 2005 21:54:25 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 18 14:54:25 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.irb.hr [161.53.22.8] (UNKNOWN)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E5sLB-0006cR-00; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 14:54:25 -0700
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (diziet.irb.hr [161.53.22.31])
by mail.irb.hr (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id j7ILrx0i010506
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 23:53:59 +0200
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id j7ILrxm7012225
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 23:53:59 +0200
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j7ILrxaX012223
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 23:53:59 +0200
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 23:53:59 +0200
From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: hanterm doesn't start on PPC
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.8
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.31
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 06:11:24PM +0200, Matej Vela wrote:
[...]
> I'm unable to reproduce this with hanterm-xf 1:3.3.1p18-9 and a remote
> PowerPC box using current unstable.  Is this still a problem for you?

Since I cannot reproduce this, and haven't heard back from you, I'm
closing this bug.  Please reopen it if it still applies.

Thanks,

Matej


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: Not a bug in phpwiki

2005-08-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reassign 299146 wnpp
Bug#299146: O: phpwiki -- an informal collaborative website manager
Bug reassigned from package `wnpp,phpwiki' to `wnpp'.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#323820: manpages-ru: Russian man pages are only shown in ru_RU.KOI8-R locale

2005-08-18 Thread Stepan Golosunov
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 07:38:11PM +0200, Matej Vela wrote:
> (manpages-ru is currently orphaned, so I'm Cc-ing debian-l10n-russian
> for help.)
> 
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 10:16:16PM +0500, Stepan Golosunov wrote:
> > Package: manpages-ru
> > Version: 0.7d-3
> > Severity: important
> > Tags: patch
> > 
> > In ru_RU.UTF-8 and ru_RU.CP1251 locales man mv is shown in English.
> > Moving man pages from /usr/share/man/ru_RU.KOI8-R/ to /usr/share/man/ru/
> > solves the problem.
> 
> But they are then shown in the wrong character set, are they not?

They are shown in the right character sets. And /usr/share/man/ru/ is
used, for example, by dpkg and gpg.

> 
> If UTF-8 and CP1251 are widely used, perhaps we should supply pages in
> all three character sets?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Matej
> 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#323884: xfs-xtt: /etc/init.d/xfs-xtt is incorrect

2005-08-18 Thread LT-P
Package: xfs-xtt
Version: 1:1.4.1.xf430-6
Severity: important

The script /etc/init.d/xfs-xtt always fails, because of a buggy variable
definition on line 7:
___
DAEMON=usr/X11R6/bin/xfs-xtt
___

instead of:
___
DAEMON=/usr/X11R6/bin/xfs-xtt
___

When corrected manually, everything is works perfectly.

Regards,
LT-P

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (1000, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (100, 'testing')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.4.26-ltp
Locale: LANG=fr_FR, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to 
fr_FR.UTF-8)

Versions of packages xfs-xtt depends on:
ii  adduser   3.67   Add and remove users and groups
ii  debconf   1.4.57 Debian configuration management sy
ii  libc6 2.3.5-3GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  zlib1g1:1.2.3-3  compression library - runtime

xfs-xtt recommends no packages.

-- debconf information:
* xfs-xtt/default_nolisten_tcp:
* xfs-xtt/default_config_directory:
* xfs-xtt/default_100dpi:
* xfs-xtt/default_use_port:


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Diesel

2005-08-18 Thread Diesel



Diesel (D2, High Speed Diesel) and other Oil Products are 
required in bulk quantities for regular supply. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 





Bug#67384: attempt was made

2005-08-18 Thread Tim Finch
ALERT: Third and FINAL Notification:

Although you were not accepted initially, we are now happy to present you with 
three deals from two different brokers.

Remember, there is absolutely No commitment required on your part and past 
credit is a non-issue.

Please validate your information with our secure/private database to ensure our 
records are accurate.

http://www.low-est.com/index.php?refid=windsor

Thank You and Good Day

Sincerely,

Tim Finch
Customer Service Rep.
eLMR INC

If this reached you in error please let our office know so we can take you off 
the list:
http://www.low-est.com/r.php






-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#121201: bethought

2005-08-18 Thread Julie Mcghee
ALERT: Third and FINAL Notification:

Although you were not accepted initially, we are now happy to present you with 
three deals from two different brokers.

Remember, there is absolutely No commitment required on your part and past 
credit is a non-issue.

Please validate your information with our secure/private database to ensure our 
records are accurate.

http://www.liquid-refi.com/index.php?refid=windsor

Thank You and Good Day

Sincerely,

Julie Mcghee
Customer Service Rep.
eLMR INC

If this reached you in error please let our office know so we can take you off 
the list:
http://www.liquid-refi.com/r.php






-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Degrees Based On Your Knowlege

2005-08-18 Thread Charles Daugherty
Good day to you sir,

A Genuine College Degree in 2 weeks !  1-206-350-5982 < - ccall n0ww !


Have you ever thought that the only thing stopping you from a great job and 
better pay was a few letters behind your name?  

Well now you can get them!

BA   BSc     MAMScMBA   PhD

Within 2 weeks!  No Study Required! 100% Verifiable!


These are real, genuine non accredited degrees that include Bachelors, Masters 
and Doctorate degrees.  

They are verifiable and student records and transcripts are also available. 

This little known secret has been kept quiet for years.  The opportunity exists 
due to a legal loophole allowing some established colleges to award degrees at 
their discretion.

With all of the attention that this news has been generating, I wouldn't be 
surprised to see this loophole closed very soon.  Order yours today.  Just call 
the number below.  You'll thank me later.



1-206-350-5982



Jodie Arias






Remember: you never know what's around the corner until you look.3


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processing of manpages-ru_0.98-2_i386.changes

2005-08-18 Thread Archive Administrator
manpages-ru_0.98-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  manpages-ru_0.98-2.dsc
  manpages-ru_0.98-2.diff.gz
  manpages-ru_0.98-2_all.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]