Your message dated Thu, 18 Aug 2005 09:02:30 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#181220: fixed in ts10 0.8.030519-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Feb 2003 14:16:16 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Feb 16 08:16:15 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from moutvdom.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.249]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18kPaY-0001S3-00; Sun, 16 Feb 2003 08:16:15 -0600
Received: from [212.227.126.223] (helo=mrvdomng.kundenserver.de)
by moutvdom.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1)
id 18kPaY-0001Bb-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 16 Feb 2003 15:16:14 +0100
Received: from [80.138.129.29] (helo=tau)
by mrvdomng.kundenserver.de with smtp (Exim 3.35 #1)
id 18kPaX-0006tc-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 16 Feb 2003 15:16:14 +0100
From: Gerhard Tonn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: wrong assumption on char signedness
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 15:22:31 +0100
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.1.99]
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.2 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level:
Package: ts10
Version: 0.8.021004-1
Severity: important
Hi,
char is per default unsigned on arm, powerpc and s390. There are several
warnings, e.g.
cpu_main.c:306: warning: comparison is always false due to limited range of
data type
during build of your package that might cause a runtime error. Please check
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=ts10&ver=0.8.021004-1&arch=s390&stamp=1042535353&file=log&as=raw
for details.
Thanks,
Gerhard
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 181220-close) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Aug 2005 16:09:31 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 18 09:09:31 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E5mqc-0007EU-00; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 09:02:30 -0700
From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#181220: fixed in ts10 0.8.030519-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 09:02:30 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Source: ts10
Source-Version: 0.8.030519-1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
ts10, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
ts10_0.8.030519-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/t/ts10/ts10_0.8.030519-1.diff.gz
ts10_0.8.030519-1.dsc
to pool/main/t/ts10/ts10_0.8.030519-1.dsc
ts10_0.8.030519-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/t/ts10/ts10_0.8.030519-1_i386.deb
ts10_0.8.030519.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/t/ts10/ts10_0.8.030519.orig.tar.gz
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated ts10 package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 17:38:58 +0200
Source: ts10
Binary: ts10
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.8.030519-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
ts10 - Emulators for PDP-10, PDP-11, VAX
Closes: 181220 297849
Changes:
ts10 (0.8.030519-1) unstable; urgency=high
.
* QA upload.
* New upstream release.
* Switch to dpatch.
* Fix build failure with gcc 4.0. Closes: #297849.
- invalid-lvalue.dpatch: Casts and conditionals are no longer accepted
as lvalues.
- name-clash.dpatch: A static global variable is not allowed to have the
same name as a non-static one.
* signed-char.dpatch: char is by default unsigned on arm, powerpc, and s390;
explicitly declare int8 as signed. Closes: #181220.
* const-too-large.dpatch: Fix "integer constant is too large for 'long'
type".
* copts.dpatch: Allow optimization flags to be overriden from debian/rules
so that DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=noopt actually works.
* TI-99 is no longer supported; remove it from the description.
* Install cfg files as examples rather than documentation.
* Install all ChangeLog and ReadMe files.
* debian/copyright: Update.
* debian/ts10.1: Boils down to the dh_make template; leave it out for now.
* debian/upstream.txt: Replace with an equivalent watch file.
* Conforms to Standards version 3.6.2.
Files:
5646a747f87688203ae233f6c1641301 575 otherosfs optional ts10_0.8.030519-1.dsc
cc9822cbeea8fd85f0950df43537fd71 585289 otherosfs optional
ts10_0.8.030519.orig.tar.gz
04d923ed9812be0fe65e0771368c6d0b 8138 otherosfs optional
ts10_0.8.030519-1.diff.gz
bd03dc0a229025d8a844c25c6f666686 267668 otherosfs optional
ts10_0.8.030519-1_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDBK5BxBYivKllgY8RAsv4AJsGyuGQcxPymEFUAiukH7ECVXoMZwCcDjc5
h603uT+5ykjkbZVJZuvEHms=
=ZsOF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
