[PING] Re: Bug#669209: RFS: yp-svipc/0.13-1 [ITP] -- System V InterProcess Communication for Python/Yorick
Hi guys, it's been two months since I initially posted this RFS, and the release is getting nearer... Regards, Thibaut. Le 26/05/12 11:05, Thibaut Paumard a écrit : > Le 08/05/12 09:43, Thibaut Paumard a écrit : >> Hi guys, > >> I'd love it if someone could have a look at this package: >> http://mentors.debian.net/package/yp-svipc >> dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/y/yp-svipc/yp-svipc_0.14-1.dsc > >> It gives access to the system V interprocess communication >> mechanisms to the [1]yorick and python (2-3) interpreters. With >> this mechanisms, it becomes possible to do multi-process parallel >> scripting and to develop mixed yorick/python applications. [1] >> http://packages.debian.org/sid/yorick > >> The Yorick plug-in can optionally be used for faster computations >> by YAO, a scientific software already in Debian: >> http://packages.debian.org/sid/yorick-yao > >> Since the initial ITP, I've worked with upstream to port the >> software to python 3 and to fix a couple of bugs. > >> Best regards, Thibaut. > > >> Le 18/04/12 09:32, Thibaut Paumard a écrit : >>> Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: >>> debian-python@lists.debian.org > >>> Dear mentors, > >>> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "yp-svipc" > >>> * Package name: yp-svipc Version : 0.13-1 Upstream >>> Author : Matthieu Bec * URL : >>> https://github.com/frigaut/yorick-svipc/ * License : >>> GPL-3 Section : Python, Science Programming Lang: C, >>> Yorick, Python Description : System V InterProcess >>> Communication for Python/Yorick ITP : >>> http://bugs.debian.org/668841 > >>> It builds those binary packages: > >>> python-svipc - interprocess communication (shared memory...) for >>> Python yorick-svipc - interprocess communication (shared >>> memory...) for Yorick > >>> To access further information about this package, please visit >>> the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/yp-svipc > >>> Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this >>> command: dget -x >>> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/y/yp-svipc/yp-svipc_0.13-1.dsc > >>> When the two packages are installed, they can be tested with: - >>> yorick-only multiprocess computing: yorick -i >>> /usr/share/doc/yorick-svipc/examples/timing-demo.i - >>> yorick/python communication: yorick -i >>> /usr/share/doc/yorick-svipc/examples/ping.i > >>> I have not been able to make it work under python3 so far (on >>> Linux: it works on a Mac). > >>> Regards, Thibaut Paumard. > > > > > > > > > signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: RFS: numpydoc/0.4-1 [RFP/ITP 559916]
(I don't intend to sponsor this package.) * Denis Laxalde , 2012-06-11, 20:51: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/numpydoc/numpydoc_0.4-1.dsc Minor nitpick: I'd use "debhelper (>= 8)" instead of "debhelper (>= 8.0.0)" in Build-Depends. (Sorry, it's my pet peeve!) Upstream provides some tests, please run the at build time. Policy-compliant package name would be "python-numpydoc", but that could be easily confused with "python-numpy-doc". So I agree with your assessment: "python-numpydoc-sphinx" is a better for the binary package. -- Jakub Wilk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120612121344.ga1...@jwilk.net
Re: RFR: cairosvg -- SVG converter based on Cairo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Taking this off mentors.
On 06/11/2012 12:12 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> The dependencies are generated by dh_python{2,3}, so it's a matter
> of fixing shebangs before they are called, isn't it?
>
> This may help:
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2011/03/msg00077.html
Thanks, that helped a lot. Now both the shebang lines and the
dependencies are correct.
> One more thing: Vcs-* fields are broken:
>
> $ svn ls -v $(grep-dctrl -ns Vcs-Svn '' < debian/control) svn: URL
> 'svn://svn.debian.org/python-modules/packages/cairosvg/trunk'
> non-existent in that revision
I used an incorrect directory in the repo. It has been renamed.
Cheers,
- --
Michael Fladischer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk/XPdgACgkQeJ3z1zFMUGajygCeMyIt27d7Nw1OE4dxP3K4K4bw
4KAAoJOvRVrs1hwbnrt599BD/N4tCMiE
=ZeTk
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fd73dd9.1090...@fladi.at
Re: RFS: numpydoc/0.4-1 [RFP/ITP 559916]
On Tue, 12 Jun 2012, Jakub Wilk wrote: > Policy-compliant package name would be "python-numpydoc", but that > could be easily confused with "python-numpy-doc". So I agree with > your assessment: "python-numpydoc-sphinx" is a better for the binary > package. if it wouldn't be "convention compliant" anyways -- may be python-sphinx-numpydoc? there is already python-sphinx-issuetracker ... actually it got renamed later on into python-sphinxcontrib.issuetracker. It might be worth checking with numpydoc people if they do not have plans on placing numpydoc under sphinxcontrib namespace just my .1 cents -- Yaroslav O. Halchenko Postdoctoral Fellow, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences Dartmouth College, 419 Moore Hall, Hinman Box 6207, Hanover, NH 03755 Phone: +1 (603) 646-9834 Fax: +1 (603) 646-1419 WWW: http://www.linkedin.com/in/yarik -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120612132716.gw15...@onerussian.com
Re: RFS: numpydoc/0.4-1 [RFP/ITP 559916]
Jakub Wilk wrote: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/numpydoc/numpydoc_0.4-1.dsc Minor nitpick: I'd use "debhelper (>= 8)" instead of "debhelper (>= 8.0.0)" in Build-Depends. (Sorry, it's my pet peeve!) Upstream provides some tests, please run the at build time. Done. Mentors updated. -- Denis Laxalde -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fd74cfa.6010...@laxalde.org
Re: RFS: numpydoc/0.4-1 [RFP/ITP 559916]
Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: Policy-compliant package name would be "python-numpydoc", but that could be easily confused with "python-numpy-doc". So I agree with your assessment: "python-numpydoc-sphinx" is a better for the binary package. if it wouldn't be "convention compliant" anyways -- may be python-sphinx-numpydoc? there is already python-sphinx-issuetracker ... But the namespace is numpydoc not sphinx, so it's even more confusing, isn't it? actually it got renamed later on into python-sphinxcontrib.issuetracker. It might be worth checking with numpydoc people if they do not have plans on placing numpydoc under sphinxcontrib namespace It seems quite unlikely to happen soon IMHO. -- Denis Laxalde -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fd74fab.8080...@laxalde.org
Re: Request to Join Project Python Applications Packaging Team from Elena Grandi (valhalla-guest)
On Tuesday, June 12, 2012 02:13:14 PM nore...@alioth.debian.org wrote: > I would like to join the python-apps team for the following reasons. > > * short term: take care of pdfposter, update it to version 0.5.0, try to > close the existing bugs. * mid term: if the Maintainer of pdfposter > continues to be MIA and the package can be orphaned, adopt it, try to make > it lintian-clear and generally keep it in good shape. * long term: possibly > find other packages that I use and need some debian love, the aim being > giving back more to debian. > > I believe I already have access to the svn repo, since I have access to the > python-modules one where I maintain python-gnupg. > > Thanks in advance > > Elena Grandi Welcome to the team. Scott K -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/2852259.zg6gLslT1C@scott-latitude-e6320
Re: Request to Join Project Python Applications Packaging Team from Elena Grandi (valhalla-guest)
On 2012-06-12 at 10:24:16 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: > On Tuesday, June 12, 2012 02:13:14 PM nore...@alioth.debian.org wrote: > > I believe I already have access to the svn repo, since I have access to the > > python-modules one where I maintain python-gnupg. it seems I was too quick to assume that:: svn: Can't create directory '/svn/python-apps/db/transactions/8873-1.txn': Permission denied debcommit: commit failed It seems that using the url svn+ssh://valhalla-gu...@svn.debian.org/svn/python-apps/packages/pdfposter I have read, but not write access. Is there a delay for it to update, or should my account be added manually to the python-apps group? Thanks in advance -- Elena ``of Valhalla'' Grandi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120612173545.gd2...@home.home.trueelena.org
Re: RFS: numpydoc/0.4-1 [RFP/ITP 559916]
On Tue, 12 Jun 2012, Denis Laxalde wrote: > >>Policy-compliant package name would be "python-numpydoc", but that > >>could be easily confused with "python-numpy-doc". So I agree with > >>your assessment: "python-numpydoc-sphinx" is a better for the binary > >>package. > >if it wouldn't be "convention compliant" anyways -- may be > >python-sphinx-numpydoc? there is already python-sphinx-issuetracker ... > But the namespace is numpydoc not sphinx, so it's even more > confusing, isn't it? that was just my .1 cents ;) yes, probably having namespace first with some kind of qualifier (-sphinx) is more logical. I just wondered if we could reach some unification for 'python-sphinx' related packages. ah -- we also have python-repoze.sphinx.autointerface providing /usr/share/pyshared/repoze/sphinx/autointerface.py -- Yaroslav O. Halchenko Postdoctoral Fellow, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences Dartmouth College, 419 Moore Hall, Hinman Box 6207, Hanover, NH 03755 Phone: +1 (603) 646-9834 Fax: +1 (603) 646-1419 WWW: http://www.linkedin.com/in/yarik -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120612181413.gb15...@onerussian.com
Re: RFS: numpydoc/0.4-1 [RFP/ITP 559916]
Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > >On Tue, 12 Jun 2012, Denis Laxalde wrote: >> >>Policy-compliant package name would be "python-numpydoc", but that >> >>could be easily confused with "python-numpy-doc". So I agree with >> >>your assessment: "python-numpydoc-sphinx" is a better for the >binary >> >>package. > >> >if it wouldn't be "convention compliant" anyways -- may be >> >python-sphinx-numpydoc? there is already python-sphinx-issuetracker >... > >> But the namespace is numpydoc not sphinx, so it's even more >> confusing, isn't it? > >that was just my .1 cents ;) yes, probably having namespace first with >some kind of qualifier (-sphinx) is more logical. I just wondered if >we >could reach some unification for 'python-sphinx' related packages. > >ah -- we also have > >python-repoze.sphinx.autointerface > >providing /usr/share/pyshared/repoze/sphinx/autointerface.py Python policy wise that's the correct name for the package. Scott K -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/08bd59be-661c-4a00-b347-dd16033a1...@email.android.com
