Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
Policy-compliant package name would be "python-numpydoc", but that
could be easily confused with "python-numpy-doc". So I agree with
your assessment: "python-numpydoc-sphinx" is a better for the binary
package.
if it wouldn't be "convention compliant" anyways -- may be
python-sphinx-numpydoc? there is already python-sphinx-issuetracker ...
But the namespace is numpydoc not sphinx, so it's even more confusing,
isn't it?
actually it got renamed later on into python-sphinxcontrib.issuetracker.
It might be worth checking with numpydoc people if they do not
have plans on placing numpydoc under sphinxcontrib namespace
It seems quite unlikely to happen soon IMHO.
--
Denis Laxalde
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fd74fab.8080...@laxalde.org
