On Tue, 12 Jun 2012, Denis Laxalde wrote: > >>Policy-compliant package name would be "python-numpydoc", but that > >>could be easily confused with "python-numpy-doc". So I agree with > >>your assessment: "python-numpydoc-sphinx" is a better for the binary > >>package.
> >if it wouldn't be "convention compliant" anyways -- may be > >python-sphinx-numpydoc? there is already python-sphinx-issuetracker ... > But the namespace is numpydoc not sphinx, so it's even more > confusing, isn't it? that was just my .1 cents ;) yes, probably having namespace first with some kind of qualifier (-sphinx) is more logical. I just wondered if we could reach some unification for 'python-sphinx' related packages. ah -- we also have python-repoze.sphinx.autointerface providing /usr/share/pyshared/repoze/sphinx/autointerface.py -- Yaroslav O. Halchenko Postdoctoral Fellow, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences Dartmouth College, 419 Moore Hall, Hinman Box 6207, Hanover, NH 03755 Phone: +1 (603) 646-9834 Fax: +1 (603) 646-1419 WWW: http://www.linkedin.com/in/yarik -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120612181413.gb15...@onerussian.com
