RFS: smbind
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "smbind". * Package name: smbind Version : 0.4.7-1 Upstream Author : Ole Myhre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/smbind/ * License : GPL Section : web It builds these binary packages: smbind - PHP-based tool for managing DNS zones for BIND The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 485513 (ITP) The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/smbind - - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/smbind/smbind_0.4.7-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Giuseppe Iuculano -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFITtIoNxpp46476aoRApc5AJ90HkyDJJ5YMrEm31O86UhNgUZiIwCeNLmj NklNnu/uNH+Y2GBWwI/Cfs8= =3v3a -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RFS: ipband (updated package)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.8-1 of my package "ipband". It builds these binary packages: ipband - daemon for subnet bandwidth monitoring with reporting via email The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 472736 (ITA) The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/i/ipband - - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/i/ipband/ipband_0.8-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Giuseppe Iuculano -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFIUOl+Nxpp46476aoRAiXnAKCKBuPpKE3cU4zdMwTrC85ZN6lKtgCgi681 xtzwApEuzbwfv5uOLSeqhkc= =QX2W -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RFS: smbind (2nd attempt)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "smbind". * Package name: smbind Version : 0.4.7-1 Upstream Author : Ole Myhre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/smbind/ * License : GPL Section : web Smbind is a PHP-based tool for managing DNS zones for BIND via the web. Supports per-user administration of zones, error checking, and a PEAR DB database backend. This tool will enable you to administer your bind-based DNS server without having to touch your zone files with a text editor, while also providing a redundant backup of the data stored in both a PEAR DB database and in the normal text configuration files. Since it is web-accessible, those without shell access or command-line skills (or whom are just plain lazy) can enjoy DNS administration from the comfort of a remote browser. Here some screenshots: http://sourceforge.net/dbimage.php?id=27962 http://sourceforge.net/dbimage.php?id=27960 http://sourceforge.net/dbimage.php?id=27958 And here you can find an online demo: http://smbind.sourceforge.net/src/main.php It builds these binary packages: smbind - PHP-based tool for managing DNS zones for BIND The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 485513 (ITP) The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/smbind - - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/smbind/smbind_0.4.7-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Giuseppe Iuculano -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFIV4/pNxpp46476aoRArdNAJ4p3VNrTAkUqZTvdeEe5uJpz/dpEQCdGJkO Ad27JAUMTm8d+yf1BmFnLNY= =m+Yo -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RFS: isoqlog (updated package)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.2.1-2 of my package "isoqlog". It builds these binary packages: isoqlog- Mail Transport Agent log analysis program The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 474127 (ITA) This is the changelog: isoqlog (2.2.1-2) unstable; urgency=low * New maintainer (Closes: #474127) * Updated to standards version 3.8.0 * Added watch file * Added Homepage field * Added debconf-updatepo to the clean target in debian/rules * Update to debhelper level 5 -- Giuseppe Iuculano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wed, 18 Jun 2008 18:37:45 +0200 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/i/isoqlog - - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/i/isoqlog/isoqlog_2.2.1-2.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Giuseppe Iuculano -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFIWUFDNxpp46476aoRAusPAJwNei6xlVmUICo7QhTHPPiyAJYXFgCfWHOV 3sMV1RJ6ZlRNkh/Z8TaoMls= =4kz6 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RFS: dmraid (updated package - ITA)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.0.rc14-1 of my package "dmraid". It builds these binary packages: dmraid - Device-Mapper Software RAID support tool dmraid-udeb - Device-Mapper Software RAID support tool (udeb) The upload would fix these bugs: 411172, 450809, 459593 (ITA) The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dmraid - - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dmraid/dmraid_1.0.0.rc14-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Giuseppe Iuculano -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFIWpwmNxpp46476aoRArqBAJ9XtVve04OY4bKHsicpCPG7mYe6+ACfRURX ZOGO9q3Y+pg8emHf2bVlm7g= =34XY -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RFS: arping (updated package - ITA)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.07pre1-1 of my package "arping". It builds these binary packages: arping - sends IP and/or ARP pings (to the MAC address) The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 210992, 436472, 487334 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/arping - - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/arping/arping_2.07pre1-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Giuseppe Iuculano -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFIXjN7Nxpp46476aoRArapAJ4/JqT00pFyxMPEL8IFPxfoCQHYBQCdEYrq ThAXUiBf78z9LPWiPM6CYKA= =WLgr -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RFS: atmailopen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "atmailopen". * Package name: atmailopen Version : 1.01-1 Upstream Author : @Mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.atmail.org/ * License : Apache License Version 2.0 Section : web Description: An Open Source Webmail Client AtMail is an open source webmail client written in PHP. It aim to provide an elegant Ajax webmail client for existing IMAP mailservers, with less bloat and a focus on an intuitive, simple user interface. . The open source version of AtMail provides users with a lightweight, yet powerful webmail client. The software can be installed on a variety of platforms with ease and without the hassles that most webmail platforms impart. . Features of AtMail Open include: * Lightweight Ajax Webmail Interface * Video Mail * PHP source code * IMAP support * Live Spell Check * Address Book It builds these binary packages: atmailopen - An Open Source Webmail Client The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 487263 (ITP) The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/atmailopen - - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/atmailopen/atmailopen_1.01-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Giuseppe Iuculano -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFIXjTnNxpp46476aoRAkO3AJ9xygmZ4Vm1fiP/U6V0KvGxFfSyGQCeMqzt 6Z8+CWna3s+e0QV4MPYricY= =T7KC -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: arping (updated package - ITA)
Cyril Brulebois ha scritto: > Maybe you want to use PGP/MIME? Mails then become readable. ;-) Ok :) > Shouldn't it be 2.07~pre1-1, so that you can version the real release as > 2.07-1? You may want to check for an appropriate versioning with dpkg: >“dpkg --compare-versions 2.07pre1-1 lt 2.07-1 && echo ok” > vs “dpkg --compare-versions 2.07~pre1-1 lt 2.07-1 && echo ok” > Fixed, thanks. > I have a package of mine to take care of, your package is the next in my > queue. Thanks a lot. Giuseppe. signature.asc Description: PGP signature signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: RFS: arping (updated package - ITA)
Cyril Brulebois ha scritto: > You then need to use version mangling in your debian/watch file. Check > for dversionmangle in uscan(1). BTW, you're still using “version=2” > while current version is 3. I modified debian/watch : version=3 opts=dversionmangle=s/\~// \ ftp://ftp.habets.pp.se/pub/synscan/arping-(.*)\.tar\.gz It seems to be correct now. > debian/changelog: > - You close #210992 in the “New upstream release” entry. While this is >strictly speaking correct, it might be nice to specify that this >isn't just closing a “please package new upstream release” bug, but a >“real” bug. You might use something like: > | * New upstream release. libnet is now initialized correctly, which fixes > |the segmentation fault on imbecile user input (Closes: #210992). Done. > - You might want to thank the previous maintainer for his former >contribution in your “closing ITA” entry, but that's really your >call. :) Done :) > - You rewrote debian/rules. OK. But that'd be nice to say why it fixes >#436472 (e.g. “now handles nostrip build option”). Done. > - When you added the debhelper compat level, did you make sure that >nothing had to be adapted from the previous behaviour, as it's >documented in “Debhelper compatibility levels” from debhelper(7)? I >know arping is quite a tiny package, but still, there could be some >surprizes. I did it, I think nothing had to be adapted from the previous behaviour. > - Did you forward the manpage fix upstream? Done. >While you're at it, there's >another one to fix (with some occurrences), namely: >I: arping: hyphen-used-as-minus-sign usr/share/man/man8/arping.8.gz >You have to run lintian with e.g. -iI to have it displayed, as it's >only an I:, not a W: or E:. Done. > - You could add your address in debian/copyright, 3rd line. You could >also use © instead of (C). The following would be sufficient: >“Copyright: © 2000-2003 Thomas Habets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>” >You could ask upstream to add license headers to *.h, and probably to >update the copyright years in arping-2/arping.c at least. And while >we're at it, the FSF address is outdated. (licensecheck -r . is your >friend, by the way.) Done. >Ah, and you may also want to specify a license >for the Debian packaging. Usually, “The Debian packaging is licensed >under the same terms and is: © $years $you” is seen. Done. > - During the build, I've noticed the -I targeting /usr/local. I guess >it could possibly break the build under some circumstances (when >having incompatible versions of the libraries under /usr/local), so >you may want to strip those locations from the -I/-L flags. I removed use of local/ in CFLAGS2 > I think that's all for now. :) > > Mraw, > KiBi. Giuseppe. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [DONE] Re: RFS: arping (updated package - ITA)
Cyril Brulebois ha scritto: > Further comments and further actions coordinated through IRC, package OK > from my point of view, and uploaded. Thanks for your patience. Feel free > to ping me directly for any later upload. Thanks! Giuseppe. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: RFS: atmailopen
Hi Laszlo,
Laszlo Boszormenyi ha scritto:
> Just a quick checking:
> - You duplicate php-date, php-mail, php-net-smtp, php-net-ldap and
> php-net-socket packages inside your pacakge. This is a security
> nightmare. Can't you just depend on those packages?
First I tried tu use debian pear linking /usr/share/php to
/usr/share/atmailopen/libs/PEAR, but
unfortunately atmail doesn't work, just a white page...
> - Your depends line list sqlite, but why not sqlite3? php5-sqlite
> support both.
Done
> - debian/rules contains some cp commands in the binary-indep target,
> maybe dh_install can handle them.
dh_install cannot rename files or directories, it can only install them with
the names they already
have into wherever you want in the package build tree.
So for example install/atmail.mysql will be installed as
usr/share/dbconfig-common/data/atmailopen/install/atmail.mysql, and not as
usr/share/dbconfig-common/data/atmailopen/install/mysql .
Is there a workaround?
> - Why don't you remove empty dirs instead of making lintian override
> them?
I think empty dir could be used, in the code I read for example:
$user['MailDir'] = "{$pref['user_dir']}/users/$first/$second/$this->Account"
> - debian/compat says debhelper level 5, but you build depend on
> debhelper (>= 6) which is well, fine; just inconsistent.
Fixed, debhelper (>= 5)
> - Your diff.gz contains patch-stamp, what for?
Fixed.
Giuseppe.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: RFS: atmailopen
Giuseppe Iuculano ha scritto: > > First I tried tu use debian pear linking /usr/share/php to > /usr/share/atmailopen/libs/PEAR, but > unfortunately atmail doesn't work, just a white page... Ok, fix the issue, now atmailopen uses PEAR in /usr/share/php and depends also on php-date, php-mail, php-net-smtp, php-net-ldap, php-net-socket, php-mail-mime Giuseppe. signature.asc Description: PGP signature signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
RFS: isoqlog (updated package - 2nd attempt)
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.2.1-2 of my package "isoqlog". It builds these binary packages: isoqlog- Mail Transport Agent log analysis program The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 474127 (ITA) This is the changelog: isoqlog (2.2.1-2) unstable; urgency=low * New maintainer, thanks to Murat Demirten for the prior work on isoqlog (Closes: #474127) * Updated to standards version 3.8.0 + Added Homepage field * Added watch file * Update to debhelper level 5 * debian/rules: + added dh_makeshlibs -a + removed unneeded (and commented) dh_* + Added debconf-updatepo to the clean target * debian/po/templates.pot: added my email in Report-Msgid-Bugs-To field -- Giuseppe Iuculano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Tue, 24 Jun 2008 12:41:15 +0200 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/i/isoqlog - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/i/isoqlog/isoqlog_2.2.1-2.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Giuseppe Iuculano signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Freemat license issue
Hello, I'm trying to package Freemat, Mathematics Framework, but Bernd Zeimetz informed me that Freemat's upstream are violating the copyright/license of minpack by not adding the proper copyright/license statements in some files. I and Bernd Zeimetz have asked upstream to fix it,but never got a reaction. At this point, Can I simply patch those files? Should I repack source (freemat-3.6.dfsg.tar.gz) ? Is it sufficient a copyright clarification on debian/copyright ? Giuseppe. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Freemat license issue
Neil Williams ha scritto: > You cannot assert that a licence applies (by patching the files to > declare a licence attribution) if you do not have confirmation from the > copyright holders of those files. i.e. you cannot claim that these files > are under any particular licence if upstream have not made that clear. [...] >> Is it sufficient a copyright clarification on debian/copyright ? > > The clarification you need is a statement from all the copyright holders > (or one who is authorised to speak on the behalf of everyone else) that > a particular licence applies to the specific files in question. > The files in question are in source upstream, but they are taken from netlib software packages (minipack, http://www.netlib.org/minpack/disclaimer) Can I claim that these files are under Minipack license, and write a statement in debian/copyright? Thanks. Giuseppe. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Freemat license issue
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Neil Williams ha scritto: > Do you mean these are embedded source? Source code that already exists > as a separate package in Debian should not be duplicated in NEW > packages. Use the existing library support and remove the unwanted > source files from your package source tarball. minpack-dev Debian package provides the headers, man pages, examples, and static library. freemat needs some files (*.f) that are not exists as a separate package in Debian >> http://www.netlib.org/minpack/disclaimer) >> >> Can I claim that these files are under Minipack license, and write a >> statement in debian/copyright? > > No. > > If there are differences, those differences still cause licence issues. > If there are no differences, there is no point having the files in the > source in the first place. > I'm sorry, but I don't understand. There are no differences, but freemat need those files for compiling. Giuseppe. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFIZ66DNxpp46476aoRAoIWAJ4v5NLATpYyH8CkTzJbdfZ5GVnYqgCbB0kj 6iwqf+tg7/PoUY2n9KElmXk= =JgIF -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Freemat license issue
Neil Williams ha scritto: >> freemat needs some files (*.f) that are not exists as a separate package >> in Debian > > If those are generated files, the -dev should provide them. > If they are source files (i.e. modifiable), these files must be > explicitly covered by a compatible licence. You don't describe what > these files are or do so I can't say much more than that. > These are Fortran files (source files), and are covered by the minpack license listed here: http://ftp.netlib.org/minpack/disclaimer I assume this license compatible because is the same of minipack Debian packages, is it right? Can I claim that these files are under Minipack license, and write a statement in debian/copyright? > > How can you claim that these are under the Minipack licence if the > minipack -dev package does not contain them? Are they packaged in the > minipack source tarball? > Yes, they are in Debian minipack source tarball. >> I'm sorry, but I don't understand. There are no differences, but freemat >> need those files for compiling. > > You need to explain what these *.f files are and what they are supposed > to provide. .f means nothing to me. (.o I'd understand, as I would > for .c, .cpp, .h, .pl and a host of others). > Fortran is programming language that is especially suited to numeric computation and scientific computing. .f or .for are the extension for source files. P.S. I'm sorry for duplicate email, I forgot to change to field. Giuseppe signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
RFS: freemat
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "freemat". * Package name: freemat Version : 3.6~dfsg-1 Upstream Author : Samit Basu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://freemat.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPLv2 Section : math It builds these binary packages: freemat- Mathematics Framework (mostly MATLAB compatible) freemat-data - freemat data files freemat-help - freemat help files The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 391887 (ITP) FreeMat is a free environment for rapid engineering and scientific prototyping and data processing. It is similar to commercial systems such as MATLAB from Mathworks, and IDL from Research Systems, but is Open Source. Thanks to Neil Williams and Bernd Zeimetz, now freemat should be dfsg compatible. dpmpar.f, enorm.f, fdjac2.f, lmdif1.f, lmdif.f, lmpar.f, qrfac.f, qrsolv.f have been removed because of licence issues and because there is no good reason for two packages to distribute identical source code (Rebuild against libminpack1) The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/freemat - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/freemat/freemat_3.6~dfsg-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Giuseppe Iuculano signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: RFS: freemat
Bernhard R. Link wrote: > - What is the purpose of your debian/README.Debian? It looks like > just another copy of the package description so should be removed. > > - why do you install README.source in the binary package? > > - your debian/rules does not specify in which order patch and > configure are to be called. As you actually change files where > this matters, config.status should depend on patch-stamp. > > - you only give CFLAGS to configure not CXXFLAGS but your program > seems to be c++. > > - registering the documentation with doc-base would be nice. Done, and re-uploaded. Thanks for reviewing Giuseppe Iuculano. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: RFS: freemat
Joseph Nahmias ha scritto: > Can you explain how this package is better / different than octave? In my opinion octave approach of having one command line program and many different GUIs, isn't the best solution. FreeMat has its own gui, and especially for plotting, to have a plotting engine to designed for being Matlab compatible is IMHO a better solution. Anyway, I agree with this official FreeMat FAQ: Q. Why another MATLAB clone? Have you heard of Octave, Scilab, etc.? Yes! FreeMat is chartered to go beyond MATLAB to include features such as a codeless interface to external C/C++/FORTRAN code, parallel/distributed algorithm development (via MPI), and advanced volume and 3D visualization capabilities. As for the open source alternatives, try them out and decide for yourself. Who said choice was a bad thing? Giuseppe. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: RFS: freemat
Bernhard R. Link ha scritto: > * Giuseppe Iuculano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070912 12:14]: >> Done, and re-uploaded. > > Some more issues: > > * you build-depend on autotools-dev and delete those file unconditionally, > so there is no need to only copy config.guess and config.sub in if they > are there. (i.e: remove the ifneq and endif around the copies) > (Mostly a cosmetic issue) > Acutally, as you tell autoreconf an -f -i, it might even copy them there > a second time. (-f also modifies INSTALL, so perhaps without -f is better) > > * You miss a build-dependency on pkg-config. (And upstream's configure > or something included by this needs better error reporting, most likely > the m4 files from pkg-config). Fixed. I removed also autoreconf, Makefile calls aclocal,automake,autoconf > > * After this unpatch no longer works. I think this is because you patch > Makfile.in files. As you call autoreconf, this can only be harmfull. > > * running autoreconf changes many files, many are not reverted by your > clean. I don't know how fix this, I need patching Makefile.in to fix UMFPACK search and so I need to call aclocal/automake/autoconf... How can I fix this? > (and no not forget to make the config.status rule then depend > configure.in instead of configure) Fixed > > * you might want to tell upstream to tell whoever is responsible for > AC_LIB_FREEMAT_CHECK in acinclude.m4, that neighter CFLAGS nor CXXFLAGS > are suiteable places to put -I in (-I and -D belong only in CPPFLAGS, > never ever into CFLAGS or CXXFLAGS). > (heck, configure even print warnings about not finding umfpack.h in the >preprocessor because of this). Ok, I'm going to open a bug in freemat sourceforge bug tracker. > > There might still be other issues, I did not yet give it a thourough look. > (took me some time to figure out it was pkg-config missing and c++ is > really slow, did not yet even do a full compile yet...) Thanks, reuploaded on mentors. Giuseppe Iuculano. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: RFS: freemat
Bernhard R. Link ha wrote: > The easiest way to make sure you have removed anything generated, is > unpacking the source package, building it, then creating the source > package and looking at the diff. As you use debian/patches for all your > changes, the diff (best look at it with diffstat) should only contain > files in the debian dir. I don't know if this is a good and elegant solution, but I run aclocal,automake,autoconf and I created a diff in debian/patches/ . In this way, make doesn't run again aclocal,automake,autoconf and debian/rules clean seems to work now... I also changed version from 3.6~dfsg-1 to 3.6+dfsg-1 and uploaded to mentors: - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/freemat/freemat_3.6+dfsg-1.dsc Giuseppe signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: RFS: freemat
Bernhard R. Link ha scritto: > * you have to make sure everything is up to date and fits together. > It is relatively complicated to get right in that way. > > For example in debian/patches/04_fix_path_dir.dpatch you have: Some Makefile.in don't need to be patched, so I fixed the patches and this issue. Reuploaded. Thanks. Giuseppe. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
RFS: atmailopen (2nd attempt)
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "atmailopen". * Package name: atmailopen Version : 1.01-1 Upstream Author : @Mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.atmail.org/ * License : Apache License Version 2.0 Section : web Description: An Open Source Webmail Client AtMail is an open source webmail client written in PHP. It aim to provide an elegant Ajax webmail client for existing IMAP mailservers, with less bloat and a focus on an intuitive, simple user interface. . The open source version of AtMail provides users with a lightweight, yet powerful webmail client. The software can be installed on a variety of platforms with ease and without the hassles that most webmail platforms impart. . Features of AtMail Open include: * Lightweight Ajax Webmail Interface * Video Mail * PHP source code * IMAP support * Live Spell Check * Address Book It builds these binary packages: atmailopen - An Open Source Webmail Client The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 487263 (ITP) The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/atmailopen - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/atmailopen/atmailopen_1.01-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Giuseppe Iuculano signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: RFS: atmailopen (2nd attempt)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ben Finney wrote: > The synopsis (short one-line package description) should not be > capitalised like the start of a sentence. Nor should it begin with an > article like "a" or "an". Please refer to > http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-best-pkging-practices#s-bpp-pkg-synopsis>. > > All of Debian is "open source", because it is all free software. This > is not a useful thing to put in the package description. > > What makes this package different or useful compared to other similar > software in Debian? Try summarising that in the synopsis. I think now it should be fixed, reuploaded. (I'm sorry for duplicate email, I forgot to change 'to' field.) Giuseppe. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFIbzoONxpp46476aoRArndAJ951ZqLPvL3LZ4Ph05sCE0uvc0FGQCfbo4t Mm/dw421uL9cL/AkVcFHSZI= =yZQo -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RFS: atmailopen (2nd attempt - updated description)
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "atmailopen". * Package name: atmailopen Version : 1.01-1 Upstream Author : @Mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.atmail.org/ * License : Apache License Version 2.0 Section : web Description: elegant and intuitive ajax webmail client written in php AtMail is a webmail client written in PHP. It aim to provide an elegant Ajax webmail client for existing IMAP mailservers, with less bloat and a focus on an intuitive, simple user interface. AtMail provides users with a lightweight, yet powerful webmail client and it is poised to deliver the next generation webmail. . Features of AtMail Open include: * Lightweight Ajax Webmail Interface * Video Mail * PHP source code * IMAP support * Live Spell Check * Address Book It builds these binary packages: atmailopen - elegant and intuitive ajax webmail client written in php The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 487263 (ITP) The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/atmailopen - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/atmailopen/atmailopen_1.01-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Giuseppe Iuculano signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: RFS: atmailopen (2nd attempt - updated description)
Eugene V. Lyubimkin ha scritto: > Debian developers reference suggest not no put "written in " into > one-line > descriptions - it is useless for users to know what language the program > written in. > Removed, thanks. New synopsis is: Description: elegant and intuitive ajax webmail client Giuseppe. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: RFS: atmailopen (2nd attempt - updated description)
Ben Finney ha scritto: > Seems fine, except for all the references to PHP; you should remove > all of them. Once the package is in Debian, you can use debtags to > classify things like implementation language. Uploaded with this new description: Description: elegant and intuitive ajax webmail client AtMail is a modern webmail client. It aim to provide an elegant Ajax webmail client for existing IMAP mailservers, with less bloat and a focus on an intuitive, simple user interface. . Features of AtMail Open include: * Lightweight Ajax Webmail Interface * Video Mail * PHP source code * IMAP support * Live Spell Check * Address Book Giuseppe. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
RFS: dmraid (updated package)
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.0.rc14-2 of my package "dmraid". It builds these binary packages: dmraid - Device-Mapper Software RAID support tool dmraid-udeb - Device-Mapper Software RAID support tool (udeb) The package appears to be lintian clean. This is the changelog: dmraid (1.0.0.rc14-2) unstable; urgency=low * Merge the following patch from Ubuntu: + 05_kernel-event-handling.dpatch, Add support for kernel driver event handling support. + 06_isw-metadata-fixes.dpatch, Intel Software RAID metadata fixes. + 08_promise-metadata-fixes.dpatch, Promise metadata fixes. + 09_promise-add-offsets.dpatch, Add extra offsets where promise metadata can be found. + 10_jmicron-name-fix.dpatch, Fix segfault when attempting to generate name for jmicron controllers. * Added 11_fix_segfault_on_big_endian.dpatch (via upstream), it fixes a segfault on big-endian platforms (ppc) The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dmraid - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dmraid/dmraid_1.0.0.rc14-2.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Giuseppe Iuculano signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: RFS: dmraid (updated package)
Giuseppe Iuculano ha scritto: > This is the changelog: Luke Yelavich opened some wishlist bugs for reducing the delta between Ubuntu and Debian, so this is the new changelog: dmraid (1.0.0.rc14-2) unstable; urgency=low * Merge the following patch from Ubuntu (thanks to Luke Yelavich): + 04_generate-uuids.dpatch, Generate UUIDs with DMRAID prefix. (Closes: #489967) + 05_kernel-event-handling.dpatch, Add support for kernel driver event handling support. (Closes: #489968) + 06_isw-metadata-fixes.dpatch, Intel Software RAID metadata fixes. (Closes: #489969) + 07_isw-raid10-nested.dpatch, Add RAID10(0+1) nested RAID level support for Intel Software RAID. (Closes: #489970) + 08_promise-metadata-fixes.dpatch, Promise metadata fixes. (Closes: #489971) + 09_promise-add-offsets.dpatch, Add extra offsets where promise metadata can be found. (Closes: #489972) + 10_jmicron-name-fix.dpatch, Fix segfault when attempting to generate name for jmicron controllers. (Closes: #489973) * Added 11_fix_segfault_on_big_endian.dpatch (via upstream), it fixes a segfault on big-endian platforms (ppc) Giuseppe Iuculano. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: I adopted a package but nobody seems to want to upload it
Dmitry E. Oboukhov ha scritto: > $ lintian -so wmaker-data_0.8-3_i386.changes > W: wmaker-data source: native-package-with-dash-version > > for adopt-upload, it is normally, I think :) Why? I don't understand relation with adopt-upload. wmaker-data isn't a native-package, so it should have an .orig.tar.gz Giuseppe Iuculano. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: RFS: atmailopen (2nd attempt - updated description)
Hi Vincent, Vincent Bernat wrote: > Hi Giuseppe! > > Somefiles haveadifferent license.Forexample, > libs/Atmail/spellChecker.php. The license given as URL is non-free. You > will need to work with upstream to sort this out. Check all files > individually. The license which is in the headers is more important than > the one in LICENSE file. Some days ago I contacted upstream to inform about this license issue, he promise me a new version in the next week! > You introduce a debconf templates. I see that you already have some > translations. However, I don't find your call for translations. Until > lenny is released, this is better to ask for translations before > releasing new debconf templates: > http://www.perrier.eu.org/weblog/2008/07/15#anti-l10n-cabal Lenny freeze is going to start the next week.., I think I haven't any chance to upload atmailopen in time..., right? [...] > The database can be remote (this is handled by dbconfig-common). You > should only suggests mysql-server and depends on mysql-client (which is > needed for dbconfig-common operations). Thanks for your review, I'm waiting new upstream version and I will fix them. Giuseppe Iuculano. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
RFS: secpanel (updated package - ITA )
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1:0.5.4-1 of my package "secpanel". It builds these binary packages: secpanel - graphical user interface for SSH and SCP The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 175738, 289151, 305134, 305135, 317063 This is the changelog: secpanel (1:0.5.4-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release, redone debian packaging from scratch (Closes: #305135) (LP: #243235) This version fixes: + Application must be killed when exiting with "Close Button" (Closes: #289151) + scp errors when directory name contains a single quote (Closes: #305134) + Program crashes on scp connection to remote host. (Closes: #175738) * New maintainer, thanks to Nick Rusnov for the prior work on secpanel (Closes: #317063) * Update to debhelper level 7 * debian/control: + Switch to tcl8.5 and tk8.5 in Depends + Added dpatch to Build-Depends + synopsis should not read like the start of a sentence, removed indefinite article "A" * Updated debian/copyright * Switched to dpatch: + 01_path_fix.dpatch fixes libdir path + 02_add_interpreted_sequence.dpatch adds #!/usr/bin/tclsh to convert_history.tcl and export_profiles.tcl * Updated to standards version 3.8.0 + Added Hompage field * Added .desktop file and .xpm icon (from Ubuntu) * Bump epoch to fix funny upstream version numbering scheme * Added a watch file -- Giuseppe Iuculano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sun, 27 Jul 2008 15:28:52 +0200 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/secpanel - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/secpanel/secpanel_0.5.4-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Giuseppe Iuculano signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
RFS: procinfo-ng
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "procinfo-ng". * Package name: procinfo-ng Version : 2.0.196-1+svn204 Upstream Author : Thaddeus Messenger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://procinfo-ng.sourceforge.net * License : GPL Section : utils It builds these binary packages: procinfo-ng - Displays system information from /proc and /sys The package appears to be lintian clean. Procinfo-NG is a small program that gathers some system information from diverse files under /proc and /sys and prints it to the screen. Procinfo-NG is a replacement for procinfo. Has most of the same features, but is written in clean C++ and has fixed many of the features that were broken due to changes in the 2.4 and 2.6 kernels. Plus, it uses uint64 for almost everything, and thus should be 64-bit safe. The upload would fix these bugs: 492807 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/procinfo-ng - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/procinfo-ng/procinfo-ng_2.0.196-1+svn204.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Giuseppe Iuculano signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: RFS: procinfo-ng
Cyril Brulebois ha scritto: > I thought the plan was to replace the old procinfo package without > introducing a new one? I didn't read about replacing, but my plan was a new package (procinfo-ng) and after some testing, if procinfo maintainer agree, obsoleting procinfo (with replace field and a dummy package). Giuseppe. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: RFS: procinfo-ng
Cyril Brulebois ha scritto: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] and below. > > Mraw, > KiBi. Thanks. > You don't need an ITP to upload the new software as procinfo. > > Bastian procinfo-ng is not procinfo, upstream changes, copyright changes, code changes, is it possible upload a new version of procinfo that actually is procinfo-ng, and so bypass the NEW upload queue? If yes, no problem for me. Giuseppe. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
RFS: secpanel (2nd attempt - updated package - ITA )
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1:0.5.4-1 of my package "secpanel". It builds these binary packages: secpanel - graphical user interface for SSH and SCP The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 175738, 289151, 305134, 305135, 317063 This is the changelog: secpanel (1:0.5.4-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release, redone debian packaging from scratch (Closes: #305135) (LP: #243235) This version fixes: + Application must be killed when exiting with "Close Button" (Closes: #289151) + scp errors when directory name contains a single quote (Closes: #305134) + Program crashes on scp connection to remote host. (Closes: #175738) * New maintainer, thanks to Nick Rusnov for the prior work on secpanel (Closes: #317063) * Update to debhelper level 7 * debian/control: + Switch to tcl8.5 and tk8.5 in Depends + Added dpatch to Build-Depends + synopsis should not read like the start of a sentence, removed indefinite article "A" * Updated debian/copyright * Switched to dpatch: + 01_path_fix.dpatch fixes libdir path + 02_add_interpreted_sequence.dpatch adds #!/usr/bin/tclsh to convert_history.tcl and export_profiles.tcl * Updated to standards version 3.8.0 + Added Hompage field * Added .desktop file and .xpm icon (from Ubuntu) * Bump epoch to fix funny upstream version numbering scheme (LP: #203080) * Added a watch file The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/secpanel - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/secpanel/secpanel_0.5.4-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Giuseppe Iuculano signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
RFS: apf-firewall (ITP)
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "apf-firewall". * Package name: apf-firewall Version : 9.6+rev4-1 Upstream Author : R-fx Networks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.r-fx.org/apf.php * License : GPL Section : net It builds these binary packages: apf-firewall - easy iptables based firewall system The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 495284 Advanced Policy Firewall (APF) is an iptables(netfilter) based firewall system designed around the essential needs of today's Internet deployed servers and the unique needs of custom deployed Linux installations. The configuration of APF is designed to be very informative and present the user with an easy to follow process, from top to bottom of the configuration file. The management of APF on a day-to-day basis is conducted from the command line with the 'apf' command, which includes detailed usage information and all the features one would expect from a current and forward thinking firewall solution. Summary of features: * detailed and well commented configuration file * granular inbound and outbound network filtering * user id based outbound network filtering * application based network filtering * trust based rule files with an optional advanced syntax * global trust system where rules can be downloaded from a central management server * reactive address blocking (RAB), next generation in-line intrusion prevention * debug mode provided for testing new features and configuration setups * fast load feature that allows for 1000+ rules to load in under 1 second * inbound and outbound network interfaces can be independently configured * global tcp/udp port & icmp type filtering with multiple methods of executing filters (drop, reject, prohibit) * configurable policies for each ip on the system with convenience variables to import settings * packet flow rate limiting that prevents abuse on the most widely abused protocol, icmp * prerouting and postrouting rules for optimal network performance * dshield.org block list support to ban networks exhibiting suspicious activity * spamhaus Don't Route Or Peer List support to ban known "hijacked zombie" IP blocks * any number of additional interfaces may be configured as firewalled (untrusted) or trusted (not firewalled) * additional firewalled interfaces can have there own unique firewall policies applied * intelligent route verification to prevent embarrassing configuration errors * advanced packet sanity checks to make sure traffic coming and going meets the strictest of standards * filter attacks such as fragmented UDP, port zero floods, stuffed routing, arp poisoning and more * configurable type of service options to dictate the priority of different types of network traffic * intelligent default settings to meet every day server setups * dynamic configuration of your servers local DNS revolvers into the firewall * optional filtering of common p2p applications * optional filtering of private & reserved IP address space The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/apf-firewall - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/apf-firewall/apf-firewall_9.6+rev4-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Giuseppe Iuculano signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
RFS: arpon
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "arpon". * Package name: arpon Version : 1.50-1 Upstream Author : Andrea Di Pasquale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://arpon.sourceforge.net/ * License : BSD Section : net It builds these binary packages: arpon - versatile anti ARP poisoning daemon ArpON (Arp handler inspectiON) is a portable handler daemon with some nice tools to handle all ARP aspects. It makes Arp a bit safer. This is possible using two kinds of anti Arp Poisoning techniques, the first is based on SARPI or "Static Arp Inspection", the second on DARPI or "Dynamic Arp Inspection" approach. . Features of ArpON include: * Detects and blocks ARP Poisoning/Spoofing attacks in statically configured networks (SARPI) * Detects and blocks ARP Poisoning/Spoofing attacks in dynamically configured (DHCP) networks (DARPI) * Detects and blocks unidirectional and bidirectional ARP attacks * Easily configurable via command line switches * Works in userspace * Can be a passive sniffer and capture all inbound/outbound ARP packets The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 492922 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/arpon - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/arpon/arpon_1.50-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Giuseppe Iuculano signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
RFS: brlcad
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "brlcad". * Package name: brlcad Version : 7.12.4-1 Upstream Author : Morrison, Christopher Sean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> U.S. Army Research Laboratory Point of Contact Davisson,Edwin O. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://brlcad.org * License : GPL/LGPL/BSD Section : graphics It builds these binary packages: brlcad - powerful combinatorial Constructive Solid Geometry (CSG) brlcad-data - brlcad data files libbrlcad - powerful combinatorial Constructive Solid Geometry (CSG) library libbrlcad-dev - powerful combinatorial Constructive Solid Geometry (CSG) library BRL-CAD is a powerful combinatorial Constructive Solid Geometry solid modeling system that includes interactive 3D solid geometry editing, high-performance ray-tracing support for rendering and geometric analysis, network-distributed framebuffer support, image and signal-processing tools, path-tracing and photon mapping support for realistic image synthesis, a system performance analysis benchmark suite, an embedded scripting interface, and libraries for robust high-performance geometric representation and analysis. . BRL-CAD supports a great variety of geometric representations including an extensive set of traditional CSG primitive implicit solids such as boxes, ellipsoids, cones, and tori, as well as explicit solids made from closed collections of Uniform B-Spline Surfaces, Non-Uniform Rational B-Spline (NURBS) surfaces, n-Manifold Geometry (NMG), and purely faceted mesh geometry. All geometric objects may be combined using boolean set-theoretic CSG operations including union, intersection, and difference. The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 289632 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/brlcad - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/brlcad/brlcad_7.12.4-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Giuseppe Iuculano signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
RFS: apf-firewall (2nd attempt)
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "apf-firewall". * Package name: apf-firewall Version : 9.6+rev4-1 Upstream Author : R-fx Networks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.r-fx.org/apf.php * License : GPL Section : net It builds these binary packages: apf-firewall - easy iptables based firewall system The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 495284 Advanced Policy Firewall (APF) is an iptables(netfilter) based firewall system designed around the essential needs of today's Internet deployed servers and the unique needs of custom deployed Linux installations. The configuration of APF is designed to be very informative and present the user with an easy to follow process, from top to bottom of the configuration file. The management of APF on a day-to-day basis is conducted from the command line with the 'apf' command, which includes detailed usage information and all the features one would expect from a current and forward thinking firewall solution. Summary of features: * detailed and well commented configuration file * granular inbound and outbound network filtering * user id based outbound network filtering * application based network filtering * trust based rule files with an optional advanced syntax * global trust system where rules can be downloaded from a central management server * reactive address blocking (RAB), next generation in-line intrusion prevention * debug mode provided for testing new features and configuration setups * fast load feature that allows for 1000+ rules to load in under 1 second * inbound and outbound network interfaces can be independently configured * global tcp/udp port & icmp type filtering with multiple methods of executing filters (drop, reject, prohibit) * configurable policies for each ip on the system with convenience variables to import settings * packet flow rate limiting that prevents abuse on the most widely abused protocol, icmp * prerouting and postrouting rules for optimal network performance * dshield.org block list support to ban networks exhibiting suspicious activity * spamhaus Don't Route Or Peer List support to ban known "hijacked zombie" IP blocks * any number of additional interfaces may be configured as firewalled (untrusted) or trusted (not firewalled) * additional firewalled interfaces can have there own unique firewall policies applied * intelligent route verification to prevent embarrassing configuration errors * advanced packet sanity checks to make sure traffic coming and going meets the strictest of standards * filter attacks such as fragmented UDP, port zero floods, stuffed routing, arp poisoning and more * configurable type of service options to dictate the priority of different types of network traffic * intelligent default settings to meet every day server setups * dynamic configuration of your servers local DNS revolvers into the firewall * optional filtering of common p2p applications * optional filtering of private & reserved IP address space The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/apf-firewall - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/apf-firewall/apf-firewall_9.6+rev4-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Giuseppe Iuculano signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: RFS: atmailopen (2nd attempt - updated description)
Hi Vincent, Vincent Bernat wrote: > Somefiles haveadifferent license.Forexample, > libs/Atmail/spellChecker.php. The license given as URL is non-free. You > will need to work with upstream to sort this out. Check all files > individually. The license which is in the headers is more important than > the one in LICENSE file. Upstream fixes this issue in SVN, so I repackaged Atmail svn revision(48) > > You introduce a debconf templates. I see that you already have some > translations. However, I don't find your call for translations. Until > lenny is released, this is better to ask for translations before > releasing new debconf templates: > http://www.perrier.eu.org/weblog/2008/07/15#anti-l10n-cabal Lenny is frozen, and atmailopen is not yet in Debian, should I run podebconf-report-po ? > > You may also want to ask debian-l10n-english@ to proofread your > templates before asking for translation. This will be done at some point > in the future, so doing it now will ease translators work. As you suggested, I'm using roundcube and torrentflux templates, and they should have been reviewed by the debian-l10n-english. > Setting global aliases is considered harmful, you should comment alias > declaration in your apache.conf. The user will have to uncomment this > directive. This ensures that nothing bad happens when someone installs > atmail. See for example: > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=476162 Done. > conf/Config.php is really huge. You could split it in several files if > some parts are more likely to be modified by the user than other > ones. This way, if a user will modify only a small part of a file, he > won't have to read a big diff. At least PHP functions at the end are > good candidates to be put in another file, IMO. Done, debian modifications are now in /etc/atmailopen/debian.php > In the long description, what does "PHP source code" means. If it means > that AtMail is open source, you can just remove it. Removed > > Since AtMail will write in /usr/share/atmailopen/users, it should be > placed in /var/lib/atmailopen instead. AtMail should work with /usr > being mounted as read-only. Done. > You still support web servers that are not part of Debian (apache, > apache-ssl, apache-perl) any more. Some people don't like this. You ship > a configuration for lighttpd but does not propose to install it. You can > look at roundcube package for some hints about this. > > Moreover, you modify the configuration of the web servers without asking > the user first. This is bad. You should add a debconf question. If you > take the one from roundcube, you can save some translations too. :) > > In postrm, you should remove web server configuration files on purge. > > The database can be remote (this is handled by dbconfig-common). You > should only suggests mysql-server and depends on mysql-client (which is > needed for dbconfig-common operations). Done. Reuploaded: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/atmailopen - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/atmailopen/atmailopen_1.02+svn48-1.dsc Giuseppe Iuculano. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: RFS: atmailopen (2nd attempt - updated description)
Vincent Bernat ha scritto: > You can also just exclude all those files from orig.tar.gz. In this > case, put "dfsg" somewhere in the version string (1.02+svn48.dfsg-1) for > example. And you should add a note in README.source on how to get the > source package from SVN (and, better, add an appropriate target in > debian/rules like get-orig-source). > Done > > I think that you can. Those templates are unlikely to change until the > upload is ready. Done. > > Other remarks: > * php5 depends on php5-cgi (as an alternative), so you can just depend >on php5. > * "$popimap_debug_file='/tmp/popimap_debug'" can lead to symlink >attacks. Use something in /var/log/atmailopen. If this is enabled by >default, don't forget to add a rule in logrotate. > * the binary-arch seems to be missing in debian/rules Fixed. Reuploaded on mentors, thanks. Giuseppe Iuculano. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
RFS: arping (updated package)
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.08-1 of my package "arping". My usual sponsor is Cyril Brulebois (kibi), I've tried asking him for an upload several time, but never gotten a response It builds these binary packages: arping - sends IP and/or ARP pings (to the MAC address) The package appears to be lintian clean. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/arping - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/arping/arping_2.08-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Giuseppe Iuculano signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: RFS: atmailopen (2nd attempt - updated description)
Giuseppe Iuculano ha scritto: > I think that you can. Those templates are unlikely to change until the >> upload is ready. > > Done. > Uploaded again with new debconf translation. Mentors seems down, uploaded here: http://sd6.iuculano.it/atmailopen/ Giuseppe. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: RFS: atmailopen (2nd attempt - updated description)
Vincent Bernat ha scritto: > You removed the binary-arch target completely. It is required by the > policy (for example, for a buildd that only wants to build > arch-dependent packages because other are built by other buildd). > > You should add it back: > > binary-arch: > binary: binary-indep binary-arch Right, done! > > popimap_debug_file variable still points to a location in /tmp. Make it > point to a file in /var/log/atmailopen to avoid any symlink attack. Argh, this was a bad cut and paste, fixed. Uploaded again: http://sd6.iuculano.it/atmailopen/ Giuseppe. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: RFS: arping (updated package)
Sandro Tosi ha scritto: > Nice work, uploaded! thanks! > Just some notes, not too big to stop the upload, but worth for a fix > in a new release: I will fix in the next release, thanks for your review. Giuseppe. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: RFS: arping (updated package)
Cyril Brulebois ha scritto: > You had on IRC, and that was “too busy to sponsor anything for now”. No, that was "I'm kinda busy right now, maybe in a few hours". Giuseppe. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: RFS: brlcad
Bernd Zeimetz ha scritto: > are you still looking for a sponsor? If so, please let me know and I'll > review/sponsor the package for you. Yes, I'm looking for a sponsor, thanks! Giuseppe. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: RFS: atmailopen (2nd attempt - updated description)
Vincent Bernat ha scritto: > Seems fine. Uploaded. Thanks! Giuseppe. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
RFS: fex
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "fex". * Package name: fex Version : 20081006-1 Upstream Author : Ulli Horlacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://fex.rus.uni-stuttgart.de/ * License : GPL Section : web It builds these binary packages: fex- web based service to send very big files fex-utils - web based service to send very big files (utils) The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 495973 F*EX (Frams' Fast File EXchange) is a service to send big (large, huge, giant, ...) files from a user A to a user B, anywhere on the internet. The sender uploads the file to the F*EX-server and the recipient automatically gets a notification e-mail with a download-URL. Main features of F*EX * file transfer of virtually unlimited file size * recepient and sender only need an e-mail program and a web browser - of any kind, they do not have to install any software * RESEND and REGET for resuming after link failures at last sent byte * auto-notification of recipient * auto-deletion after download * auto-deletion after expiration date (default: 5 days) * full-users can create sub-users, who can send only to this full-user * maintenance-free: no admin interaction necessary besides creating new F*EX accounts * Sending to multiple recipients needs storage on the server only once * F*EX is a HTTP web-service and needs no firewall-tunnels * support for streams, too (SEX : Stream EXchange) * for real UNIX users, there are the shell programs fexsend and fexget to avoid annoying web browser usage * protocol and source-code free available (GPL) The end user normally uses F*EX with his web browser and the URLs http://YOURFEXSERVER/fup (file upload) and http://YOURFEXSERVER/fop (file download). F*EX is not an anonymous service, the admin must register the user with his e-mail address and auth-ID string. This task must be done with the CLI program "fac" (F*EX admin control). You can imagine the auth-ID as some kind of low security password. Alternatively the users can register theirselves with http://YOURFEXSERVER/fur (F*EX user registration), if the admin allows them to do so. This is done by setting the variable @local_hosts in /etc/fex/fex.ph, for example: @local_hosts = qw(127.0.0.1 10.10.100.0-10.10.255.255); F*EX full users can theirselves register "sub-users" with http://YOURFEXSERVER/fuc sub-users can only fex to their full-user, not to any others. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/fex - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/fex/fex_20081006-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Giuseppe Iuculano signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
RFS: smbind (updated package)
From: Giuseppe Iuculano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org Subject: RFS: smbind (updated package) Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.4.7-3 of my package "smbind". It builds these binary packages: smbind - PHP-based tool for managing DNS zones for BIND The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 501956 Changelog is quite trivial: smbind (0.4.7-3) unstable; urgency=low * debian/prerm: Fix the bad priority setting on the restart webserver debconf question * Bump debhelper compatibility to 7 to use dh_lintian * Using dh_lintian for lintian overrides * Added Spanish debconf translation, thanks to Ignacio Mondino (Closes: #501956) The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/smbind - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/smbind/smbind_0.4.7-3.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Giuseppe Iuculano signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
RFS: procinfo (tpu upload to fix RC bugs)
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 18-2+lenny1 of my package "procinfo". It builds these binary packages: procinfo - Displays system information from /proc The upload would fix these bugs: 379592, 502219 This is a tpu upload approved by the release team: http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2008/10/msg00683.html The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/procinfo - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/procinfo/procinfo_18-2+lenny1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Giuseppe Iuculano signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
RFS: toshset (updated package, ITA)
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.73-3 of my package "toshset". It builds these binary packages: toshset- Access much of the Toshiba laptop hardware interface The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 403683 (ITA) The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/toshset - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/toshset/toshset_1.73-3.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Giuseppe Iuculano signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: RFS: toshset (updated package, ITA)
Michal Čihař ha scritto: > If I rebuilt package twice I get huge changes to configure in debdiff: > > $ debdiff toshset_1.73-3.dsc orig/toshset_1.73-3.dsc | diffstat > configure | 4543 > ++ > 1 file changed, 751 insertions(+), 3792 deletions(-) > > I guess you should delete it in clean target? Fixed > > $ lintian -IE toshset_1.73-3_amd64.changes > W: toshset source: patch-system-but-direct-changes-in-diff configure > W: toshset: manpage-has-errors-from-man usr/share/man/man1/toshset.1.gz 27: > warning: `hr' not defined Fixed > Following compiler warnings can be easily fixed by adding > missing includes: > > toshsat1800-irdasetup.c:265: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of > built-in function ‘memcpy’ > toshsat1800-irdasetup.c:641: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of > built-in function ‘exit’ > toshsat1800-irdasetup.c:708: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of > built-in function ‘exit’ > toshsat1800-irdasetup.c:739: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of > built-in function ‘exit’ Fixed. > Also do you plan to address #487154? > Previous maintainer wrote that the possible fix for #487154 is a kernel patch [0], and I agree. Real problem is that toshiba_acpi and toshiba modules are not loaded correctly. We are close to release, so I will ask to include that patch for lenny+1 Uploaded again on mentors. [0] http://memebeam.org/free-software/toshiba_acpi/ Giuseppe signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: RFS: toshset (updated package, ITA)
Chris Bannister ha scritto: >> It builds these binary packages: >> toshset- Access much of the Toshiba laptop hardware interface > > "most" is the correct word to use here. Thanks, I will fix it in the next revision. Giuseppe. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
RFS: toshutils (updated package- ITA)
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.0.1+debian-21 of my package "toshutils". It builds these binary packages: toshutils - Toshiba laptop utilities The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 403685 (ITA) The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/toshutils - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/toshutils/toshutils_2.0.1+debian-21.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Giuseppe Iuculano signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: RFS: toshutils (updated package- ITA)
Michal Čihař ha scritto: > What is purpose of the x86_64 patch? /usr/X11R6/lib64 is definitely not > used on Debian and setting CFLAGS to -mtune=k8 also does not look like > a good idea. I think it would be better to drop -mtune from CFLAGS at > all. Right, fixed. > > Please include README.source describing what changes you do to > the tarball and also about dpatch, see > http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#s-readmesource > Added and uploaded again on mentors. Thanks. Giuseppe. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
RFS: mod-spamhaus
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mod-spamhaus". * Package name: mod-spamhaus Version : 0.5-1 Upstream Author : Luca Ercoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/mod-spamhaus/ * License : GPL Section : web It builds these binary packages: libapache2-mod-spamhaus - Apache DNSBL module that deny access to a known bad IP address The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 503395 What's mod_spamhaus === mod_spamhaus is an Apache module that use DNSBL in order to block spam relay via web forms, preventing URL injection, block http DDoS attacks from bots and generally protecting your web service denying access to a known bad IP address. It take advantage of the Spamhaus Block List (SBL) and the Exploits Block List (XBL) querying sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org Spamhaus's DNSBLs are offered as a free public service for low-volume non-commercial use. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mod-spamhaus - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mod-spamhaus/mod-spamhaus_0.5-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Giuseppe Iuculano signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
RFS: nmapsi4
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "nmapsi4". * Package name: nmapsi4 Version : 0.1-1 Upstream Author : Francesco Cecconi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://nmapsi4.netsons.org/web/ * License : GPL Section : web It builds these binary packages: nmapsi4- interface to nmap, the Network scanner The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 503469 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/nmapsi4 - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/nmapsi4/nmapsi4_0.1-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Giuseppe Iuculano signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: RFS: nmapsi4
Sandro Tosi ha scritto: > Why is "Section: web"? if you want to mimik nmap, its section is net. > > Please use a versione build-dep on cmake, since upstream clearly > requires "cmake >= 2.6" but for example etch has 2.4.5 . Fixed. > > What about add "graphical" to the description (just to clarify it's a gui)? Added. > Did you run a spell check on the long description? from "menagement" I > can inferr you didn't ;) additionally the correct form is "to manage", > and other little glinches Fixed > Since you claim "Standards-Version: 3.8.0", you need to ship > debian/README.source simply with a simple text like: Added > Are you sure it's GPLv2+? It seems all the source code file (take > "./src/core/nmapParser.cpp" as example) are GPLv2. Use the boilerplate > from that file, and link to GPLv2 (and state clearly the version of > GPL you'd use for the packaging; hint: use the same of the source code > ;) ). > > Please leave the whole copyright line as > > Copyright (C) 2007-2008 by Francesco Cecconi > > as (C) by itself has no legal value for copyright claims. > > Personally, I like to see Upstream autor and Copyright written in a > new line and indented with 4 space (just like the GPL boilerplate is). Fixed. > Usually you don't need to specify "usr/bin" in "debian/dirs", since > the upsteam intallation code takes care of it: is this the case too? Right, removed debian/dirs > Did you submit the manpage upstream? Or Francesco send it to you to > avoid a new release just to add it? I found that manpage on .deb downloaded from upstream website[0], so I assume he will add it in the next release. > > there is a small typo in DP of > debian/patches/01_fix_desktop_entry.dpatch (and you can s/=// in DP > too). Fixed > There are some dh_* call not needed you'd like to remove: find out what :) > > Please comment DH_VERBOSE. > > Instead of "cd ; $(MAKE)" you might be interester in "-C dir, > --directory=dir" make option. > > Please merge "rm -f *-stamp" into dh_clean (they do the same job). Fixed > > I think it's enough ;) Get back to me once you've prepared the new package. It seems that something is wrong with mentors.debian.net, uploaded here: http://ctu.iuculano.it/nmapsi4/ [0] http://code.google.com/p/nmapsi4/downloads/list Thanks, Giuseppe. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: RFS: nmapsi4
Sandro Tosi ha scritto: > On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 23:07, Giuseppe Iuculano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Sandro Tosi ha scritto: >>> Why is "Section: web"? if you want to mimik nmap, its section is net. > > what about this? Fixed > But description still contains: > > - "NmapSI4 s a" > - "design goals" while I think it's a singular goal, that is "to > provide a complete nmap interface for Users" > - "Users" that needs to be un-capitalized > > and even Network should be uncapitalized Argh, now it should be really fixed :) > >>> Since you claim "Standards-Version: 3.8.0", you need to ship >>> debian/README.source simply with a simple text like: >> Added > > Good, but I don't this the "-- " line belongs to > this file, so I'd remove it > Ok, removed. >>> Please merge "rm -f *-stamp" into dh_clean (they do the same job). >> Fixed > > Ehm, not this :) you simply removed the "rm" line... Yes, because dh_clean (debhelper v7) runs a "rm -f *-stamp", from man page: It also removes common files that should not appear in a debian diff: #*# *~ DEADJOE *.orig *.rej *.SUMS TAGS .deps/* *.P *-stamp Uploaded again. Giuseppe. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: RFS: nmapsi4
Sandro Tosi ha scritto: > Uploaded! Thanks for your contribution to Debian! Thanks! Giuseppe. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Bug#503395: RFS: mod-spamhaus
Paul Wise ha scritto: > > The upstream source does not contain any copyright information, you > might want to ask them to fix that. There is a LICENSE file, isn't it enough? Giuseppe. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: RFS: mod-spamhaus
Paul Wise ha scritto: > A review of your source package: > > debian/watch should use the standard sf qa redirector, please read the > uscan manual page. > > The upstream source does not contain any copyright information, you > might want to ask them to fix that. > > There is a new upstream version available (0.7). > > Please ask upstream to fix the compiler warnings: > > src/mod_spamhaus.c: In function 'core': > src/mod_spamhaus.c:256: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer > without a cast > src/mod_spamhaus.c: In function 'num_cached_ip': > src/mod_spamhaus.c:358: warning: passing argument 1 of 'atoi' makes > pointer from integer without a cast > src/mod_spamhaus.c: At top level: > src/mod_spamhaus.c:367: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type > src/mod_spamhaus.c:368: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type > src/mod_spamhaus.c:369: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type > src/mod_spamhaus.c:370: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type > Upstream uploaded a new tarball with copyright and compiler warnings fixes. I uploaded the new revision on mentors: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mod-spamhaus - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mod-spamhaus/mod-spamhaus_0.7-1.dsc Thanks for your review. Giuseppe. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: RFS: mod-spamhaus
Paul Wise ha scritto: > On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 2:15 AM, Giuseppe Iuculano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mod-spamhaus/mod-spamhaus_0.7-1.dsc > > Some more things: > > Your package description needs some grammar fixes, please ask for a > review on debian-l10n-english. Done [0] > > You don't specify any specific version the GPL for your packaging, was > that intentional? Ok, now it is "licensed under the same license as the software itself." > > Upstream's license grant is unclear about the GPL version; "either > version 3 of the License." doesn't make sense. > > The ReadMe.txt file only contains information present elsewhere in the > package (debian/copyright, debian/control, debian/rules, > debian/postinst, debian/conf), I don't think you need to ship it in > the .deb. > > Other than that (and without having tested it) the package looks good. > Fixed and uploaded again on mentors. [0] http://lists.debian.org/debian-l10n-english/2008/11/msg3.html Giuseppe. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: RFS: mod-spamhaus
Paul Wise ha scritto:
> Sorry about this, but I just noticed that there is already a DNSBL
> module for apache2 in Debian (libapache2-mod-defensible). Please
> investigate if mod-spamhaus is useful to add despite that.
>
Yes, I know, but I prefer (and I'm using) mod-spamhaus because:
1) I can choose HTTP methods (POST,PUT,...) to block
2) I can have a whitelist
3) I can have a custom error ("Access Denied, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] for more
information)
Giuseppe.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: RFS: mod-spamhaus
Paul Wise ha scritto: > On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 11:29 PM, Giuseppe Iuculano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Yes, I know, but I prefer (and I'm using) mod-spamhaus because: > > Fair enough, I've uploaded the package. > > Thanks for your work, please mail debian-mentors for future uploads > and I'll upload if I am able. > Thank you, Giuseppe. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
RFS: fex (2nd attempt)
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "fex". * Package name: fex Version : 20081028-1 Upstream Author : Ulli Horlacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://fex.rus.uni-stuttgart.de/ * License : GPL Section : web It builds these binary packages: fex- web service for transferring very large files fex-utils - web service for transferring very large files (utils) Description: web service for transferring very large files F*EX (Frams's Fast File EXchange) is a service for transferring big (large, huge, giant) files from a user A to a user B, anywhere on the Internet. . The sender uploads the file to the F*EX-server and the recipient automatically gets a notification e-mail with a download-URL. . Main features of F*EX: . * file transfer of virtually unlimited file size * sender and recipient only need an e-mail program and a web browser (of any kind; they do not have to install any software) * RESEND and REGET for resuming after link failures at last sent byte * auto-notification of recipient * auto-deletion after download * auto-deletion after expiration date (default: 5 days) * full-users can create sub-users, who can send only to this full-user * maintenance-free: no administration necessary beyond creating new F*EX accounts * multiple recipients only require one stored copy * F*EX uses HTTP and needs no firewall tunnels * support for streams, too (SEX: Stream EXchange) * shell clients provided for commandline users: fexsend and fexget. The end user normally uses F*EX with his web browser and the URLs http://YOURFEXSERVER/fup (file upload) and http://YOURFEXSERVER/fop (file download). F*EX is not an anonymous service, the admin must register the user with his e-mail address and auth-ID string. This task must be done with the CLI program "fac" (F*EX admin control). You can imagine the auth-ID as some kind of low security password. Alternatively the users can register theirselves with http://YOURFEXSERVER/fur (F*EX user registration), if the admin allows them to do so. This is done by setting the variable @local_hosts in /etc/fex/fex.ph, for example: @local_hosts = qw(127.0.0.1 10.10.100.0-10.10.255.255); F*EX full users can theirselves register "sub-users" with http://YOURFEXSERVER/fuc sub-users can only fex to their full-user, not to any others. The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 495973 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/fex - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/fex/fex_20081028-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Giuseppe Iuculano signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: RFS: fex (2nd attempt)
Neil Williams ha scritto: > Missing line here: > > Language: (C, C++, Perl, PHP, etc.) which? > > This line is not optional. I used the default template on mentors.debian.net. [...] >> I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. > > I can't see any point, myself. Sounds like another package that no-one > needs in Debian, except the maintainer. > I installed this service about a month ago, and feedbacks from my users are extremely positive. Anyway I respect your (authoritative) point of view and so I'm going to drop my ITP. Giuseppe. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: RFS: fex (2nd attempt)
Neil Williams ha scritto: > > It was only my point of view, giving some idea of why I (and by the > looks of it, other sponsors) ignored the first request. If you don't > feel that you can justify the ITP, feel free to close it. > If you search "send big files" with google, you will find *a lot* of commercial services like DropLoad, ALLPeers, YouSendIt,etc. FEX makes the same job, but it is open source. So, I really don't understand your "Sounds like another package that no-one needs in Debian, except the maintainer" sentence, and I really don't understand what I should justify. Anyway I renamed my ITP to RFP, I lost my interest to get FEX into debian, I will send my .deb to upstream. Giuseppe. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: RFS: fex (2nd attempt)
markus schnalke ha scritto: > Hmm ... you lost your interest ... within one day?! > After only one person asked for some reasons of your intention. > > What do you think, you'll do if you maintain the package and problems > come up ... leave? > > > Think about it. Finding a sponsor isn't exactly one hobby that I should suggest to a friend, it's rather frustrating. You spend a lot of your free time, and you get an answer from a DD that no one needs your package except the maintainer (you). At this point I ask myself why I should continue and waste my time. This is what I mean with "I lost my interest". This is not exactly a "quit" after a problem, this is simply a lack of motivation. Giuseppe. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: RFS: fex (2nd attempt)
retitle 495973 ITP: fex -- web service for transferring very large files owner 495973 ! thanks Hi, Adeodato Simó ha scritto: > yourself get demotivated because of it. For extra points, you can ask > other DDs you already know for their opinion, and work with that. I followed your suggestion, and asked Enrico Zini for his opinion. He is going to sponsor F*EX. Many thanks. Giuseppe. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
RFS: gsmartcontrol
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gsmartcontrol". * Package name: gsmartcontrol Version : 0.8.2-1 Upstream Author : Alexander Shaduri * URL : http://gsmartcontrol.berlios.de * License : multi-licensed GPLv2, GPLv3, Whatever License, Zlib License, Boost, Whatever License, Zlib License Section : utils Language: C++ It builds these binary packages: gsmartcontrol - graphical user interface for smartctl The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 508512 GSmartControl is a graphical user interface for smartctl, which is a tool for querying and controlling SMART (Self-Monitoring, Analysis, and Reporting Technology) data on modern hard disk drives. It allows you to inspect the drive's SMART data to determine its health, as well as run various tests on it. . Features: . * automatically reports and highlights any anomalies; * allows enabling/disabling Automatic Offline Data Collection; * allows enabling/disabling SMART itself; * supports configuration of global and per-drive options for smartctl; * performs SMART self-tests; * displays drive IDs, capabilities, attributes, and self-test/error logs; * can read in smartctl data from a saved file, interpreting it as a read-only virtual device. Some screenshots: http://gsmartcontrol.berlios.de/home/index.php/en/Screenshots The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gsmartcontrol - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gsmartcontrol/gsmartcontrol_0.8.2-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Giuseppe Iuculano signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: RFS: mediawiki (was Re: [Secure-testing-team] mediawiki: NMU to fix CVE-2008-5249, CVE-2008-5250, CVE-2008-5252)
Nico Golde ha scritto: > Uploaded. You can directly ask security team members to > sponsor this next time :) Thanks! Giuseppe. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
RFS: fspy - filesystem activity monitoring tool
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "fspy". * Package name: fspy Version : 0.1.0-1 Upstream Author : Richard Sammet * URL : http://mytty.org/fspy/ * License : GPL Programming Lang: C Section : misc It builds these binary packages: fspy - filesystem activity monitoring tool The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 513577 Description: filesystem activity monitoring tool fspy is an easy to use Linux filesystem activity monitoring tool which is meant to be small, fast and to handle system resources conservative. You can apply filters, use diffing and your own output format in order to get the best results. screenshots: http://mytty.org/fspy/regular_exec.png http://mytty.org/fspy/advanced_exec.png The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/fspy - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/fspy/fspy_0.1.0-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Giuseppe Iuculano signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: RFS: fspy - filesystem activity monitoring tool
Matthew Palmer ha scritto: > Looks good, except that the manpage mentions info pages which don't appear > to exist in the package or upstream tarball. Fixed. I saw there is an Ubuntu bug open, "[needs-packaging] fspy", so closing it in debian/changelog Diff from previous upload: http://git.debian.org/?p=users/derevko-guest/fspy.git;a=commitdiff;hp=4446346e1b7782d4e767a6d9904ee8c31255de8d;h=HEAD Cheers, Giuseppe. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: RFS: fspy - filesystem activity monitoring tool
Matthew Palmer ha scritto: > Looks good. Uploaded. Ping me directly for future uploads if you like. Thanks! Cheers, Giuseppe. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
RFS: kompozer - complete Web Authoring System
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "kompozer". * Package name: kompozer Version : 0.7.10+dfsg+svn117-1 Upstream Author : Fabien Cazenave * URL : http://kompozer.net * License : MPL 1.1 / GPL 2.0 or subsequent / LGPL 2.1 or subsequent Section : web It builds these binary packages: kompozer - complete Web Authoring System kompozer-data - kompozer data files kompozer-dev - KompoZer development files The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 406553 Description: complete Web Authoring System KompoZer is a complete Web Authoring System that combines web file management and easy-to-use WYSIWYG (What You See Is What You Get) web page editing. . KompoZer is designed to be extremely easy to use, making it ideal for non-technical computer users who want to create an attractive, professional-looking web site without needing to know HTML or web coding. KompoZer is already in Ubuntu. Screenshots: http://kompozer.net/screenshots.php http://kompozer.net/images/kpz-html+css.png The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/k/kompozer - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/k/kompozer/kompozer_0.7.10+dfsg+svn117-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Giuseppe Iuculano signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: RFS: weborf
Karun Dambiec ha scritto:
> Fast and small webserver, has the basedir option and can be launched
This is somewhat debatable.
Sometimes ago I had a discussion with upstream about poor weborf performance. I
think he didn't care about my objections, now with a simple "ab -n 1000 -c 100
http://localhost:8080/"; I got a segfault:
# ./weborf -p 8080 -d
Weborf
This program comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY.
This is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it
under certain conditions.
For details see the GPLv3 Licese.
Run ./weborf --help to see the options
# ab -n 1000 -c 100 http://localhost:8080/
This is ApacheBench, Version 2.3 <$Revision: 655654 $>
Copyright 1996 Adam Twiss, Zeus Technology Ltd, http://www.zeustech.net/
Licensed to The Apache Software Foundation, http://www.apache.org/
Benchmarking localhost (be patient)
Completed 100 requests
Completed 200 requests
*** glibc detected *** ./weborf: free(): invalid pointer: 0x084102a0 ***
Completed 300 requests
=== Backtrace: =
/lib/i686/cmov/libc.so.6[0xb7e47624]
/lib/i686/cmov/libc.so.6(cfree+0x96)[0xb7e49826]
./weborf[0x804a4bd]
/lib/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0[0xb7f3a4c0]
/lib/i686/cmov/libc.so.6(clone+0x5e)[0xb7eb96de]
=== Memory map:
08048000-0804c000 r-xp 09:00 1433565/root/tmp/weborf-0.9/weborf
0804c000-0804d000 rw-p 3000 09:00 1433565/root/tmp/weborf-0.9/weborf
08409000-0842a000 rw-p 08409000 00:00 0 [heap]
ab3f4000-ab3f5000 ---p ab3f4000 00:00 0
ab3f5000-abbf5000 rw-p ab3f5000 00:00 0
abbf5000-abbf6000 ---p abbf5000 00:00 0
abbf6000-ac3f6000 rw-p abbf6000 00:00 0
ac3f6000-ac3f7000 ---p ac3f6000 00:00 0
ac3f7000-acbf7000 rw-p ac3f7000 00:00 0
acbf7000-acbf8000 ---p acbf7000 00:00 0
acbf8000-ad3f8000 rw-p acbf8000 00:00 0
ad3f8000-ad3f9000 ---p ad3f8000 00:00 0
ad3f9000-adbf9000 rw-p ad3f9000 00:00 0
adbf9000-adbfa000 ---p adbf9000 00:00 0
adbfa000-ae3fa000 rw-p adbfa000 00:00 0
ae3fa000-ae3fb000 ---p ae3fa000 00:00 0
ae3fb000-aebfb000 rw-p ae3fb000 00:00 0
aebfb000-aebfc000 ---p aebfb000 00:00 0
aebfc000-af3fc000 rw-p aebfc000 00:00 0
af3fc000-af3fd000 ---p af3fc000 00:00 0
af3fd000-afbfd000 rw-p af3fd000 00:00 0
afbfd000-afbfe000 ---p afbfd000 00:00 0
afbfe000-b03fe000 rw-p afbfe000 00:00 0
b03fe000-b03ff000 ---p b03fe000 00:00 0
b03ff000-b0bff000 rw-p b03ff000 00:00 0
b0bff000-b0c0 ---p b0bff000 00:00 0
b0c0-b142d000 rw-p b0c0 00:00 0
b142d000-b150 ---p b142d000 00:00 0
b15ca000-b15cb000 ---p b15ca000 00:00 0
b15cb000-b1dcb000 rw-p b15cb000 00:00 0
b1dcb000-b1dcc000 ---p b1dcb000 00:00 0
b1dcc000-b25cc000 rw-p b1dcc000 00:00 0
b25cc000-b25cd000 ---p b25cc000 00:00 0
b25cd000-b2dcd000 rw-p b25cd000 00:00 0
b2dcd000-b2dce000 ---p b2dcd000 00:00 0
b2dce000-b35ce000 rw-p b2dce000 00:00 0
b35ce000-b35cf000 ---p b35ce000 00:00 0
b35cf000-b3dcf000 rw-p b35cf000 00:00 0
b3dcf000-b3dd ---p b3dcf000 00:00 0
b3dd-b45d rw-p b3dd 00:00 0
b45d-b45d1000 ---p b45d 00:00 0
b45d1000-b4dd1000 rw-p b45d1000 00:00 0
b4dd1000-b4dd2000 ---p b4dd1000 00:00 0
b4dd2000-b55d2000 rw-p b4dd2000 00:00 0
b55d2000-b55d3000 ---p b55d2000 00:00 0
b55d3000-b5dd3000 rw-p b55d3000 00:00 0
b5dd3000-b5dd4000 ---p b5dd3000 00:00 0
b5dd4000-b65d4000 rw-p b5dd4000 00:00 0
b65d4000-b65d5000 ---p b65d4000 00:00 0
b65d5000-b6dd5000 rw-p b65d5000 00:00 0
b6dd5000-b6dd6000 ---p b6dd5000 00:00 0
b6dd6000-b75d6000 rw-p b6dd6000 00:00 0
b75d6000-b75d7000 ---p b75d6000 00:00 0
b75d7000-b7dd9000 rw-p b75d7000 00:00 0
b7dd9000-b7f2e000 r-xp 09:00 1221738/lib/i686/cmov/libc-2.7.so
b7f2e000-b7f2f000 r--p 00155000 09:00 1221738/lib/i686/cmov/libc-2.7.so
b7f2f000-b7f31000 rw-p 00156000 09:00 1221738/lib/i686/cmov/libc-2.7.so
b7f31000-b7f34000 rw-p b7f31000 00:00 0
b7f34000-b7f49000 r-xp 09:00 1222018
/lib/i686/cmov/libpthread-2.7.so
b7f49000-b7f4b000 rw-p 00014000 09:00 1222018
/lib/i686/cmov/libpthread-2.7.so
b7f4b000-b7f4d000 rw-p b7f4b000 00:00 0
b7f5f000-b7f6b000 r-xp 09:00 1579953/lib/libgcc_s.so.1
b7f6b000-b7f6c000 rw-p c000 09:00 1579953/lib/libgcc_s.so.1
b7f6c000-b7f6f000 rw-p b7f6c000 00:00 0
b7f6f000-b7f7 r-xp b7f6f000 00:00 0 [vdso]
b7f7-b7f8a000 r-xp 09:00 896559 /lib/ld-2.7.so
b7f8a000-b7f8c000 rw-p 0001a000 09:00 896559 /lib/ld-2.7.so
bfc76000-bfc8b000 rw-p bffeb000 00:00 0 [stack]
apr_socket_recv: Connection reset by peer (104)
Total of 311 requests completed
I didn't recommend to upload weborf in Debian.
Cheers,
Giuseppe.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: RFS: kompozer - complete Web Authoring System
Hi, jredr...@debian.org ha scritto: > Hi Giuseppe, > I'm interesting in sponsoring this package, but before checking it, a > previous question: > why have you packaged versión 0.7.10 instead of the latest available > version 0.8a1? I packaged the svn revision 117, the last available (0.7.10+dfsg+svn117-1 = 0.8a1) > http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=170132 That tar.gz doesn't contain sources, but binary version for linux and Windows. Cheers, Giuseppe. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: RFS: smplayer (updated package)
Hi Sandro, Sandro Tosi ha scritto: > There's just one lintian warning you might want to address in the next > release: > > W: smplayer: desktop-mimetype-without-update-call > /usr/share/applications/smplayer.desktop > W: smplayer: desktop-mimetype-without-update-call > /usr/share/applications/smplayer_enqueue.desktop This could be a false positive, latest debhelper version deprecate dh_desktop, it no longer does anything. New desktop-file-utils 0.15-2 has a trigger which renders dh_desktop completely useless. Cheers, Giuseppe. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: RFS: burn 0.4.3-2.2 (Lenny security bug fixes)
Hi Ben, Ben Finney ha scritto: > Ben Finney writes: > >> The debdiff against the version currently in Lenny is online at >> http://paste.debian.net/45120/>. > > The syntax highlighter at that site is munging the display of some > characters. (I've reported this issue to the site maintainer.) The patch > as plain text is at http://paste.debian.net/45120/plain/45120> and > is correct. > I'm not a DD, but just a note. "TEMP-0542329" is not thought for external reference, probably you should remove that from your changelog. Cheers, Giuseppe. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: RFS: qemu-kvm (kvm)
Michael Tokarev ha scritto: > I wrote to debian kvm package maintainer several times, I > submitted a bugreport against kvm long time ago, but never > heard back. > > So now I'm requesting a sponsor to upload my packages into > debian. You are trying to hijack kvm, this is not the way to do it appropriately. Anyway your package is completely wrong, you only changed the source name, we can't have the same binary name for two different packages, or two identical packages with a different name. Cheers, Giuseppe. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: RFS: qemu-kvm (kvm)
Michael Tokarev ha scritto: >> You are trying to hijack kvm, this is not the way to do it appropriately. > > I'm trying to make it to work. > And to my shame, I don't know how to do that in another way. > I already support debian users by maintaining the package > out of debian. Simply you can't. You can't take over a package that you feel is neglected without the assent of the current maintainer. Cheers, Giuseppe. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: RFS: qemu-kvm (kvm)
Felipe Sateler ha scritto: > That is not true. That is precisely the point of a hijacking. The > maintainer has been unresponsive for half a year according to Michael, > so it is perfectly reasonable to attempt a hijack (even if it was not > correctly done). No it isn't, if you think the maintainer is inactive, you should contact m...@qa.debian.org, please read [1] and [2]. [1]http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/pkgs.html#adopting [2]http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/beyond-pkging.html#mia-qa Cheers, Giuseppe. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: RFS: qtsmbstatus
Hi, Alessio Treglia ha scritto: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "qtsmbstatus". I'll take a look at it. Will send you a message later. Cheers, Giuseppe signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: RFS: qtsmbstatus
Giuseppe Iuculano ha scritto: > I'll take a look at it. Will send you a message later. Uploaded, thanks. Feel free to contact me directly for future uploads of this package. Cheers, Giuseppe. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: RFS: pulseaudio (updated package)
Hi Michael! Il 27/03/2010 19:58, Michael Gilbert ha scritto: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.9.21-1+nmu1 > of my package "pulseaudio", which fixes CVE-2009-1299 (bug #573615). Thanks for your work, I've uploaded your NMU with small modifications in debian/changelog: --- pulseaudio-0.9.21/debian/changelog +++ pulseaudio-0.9.21/debian/changelog @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -pulseaudio (0.9.21-1+nmu1) unstable; urgency=low +pulseaudio (0.9.21-1.1) unstable; urgency=high +nmuX should be used only for native packages, please refer to d-reference 5.11.2[1] BTW, for security upload, you can also ask to secure-testing-team. [1]http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/pkgs.html#nmu-changelog Cheers, Giuseppe signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: RFS: pulseaudio (updated package)
Il 28/03/2010 23:41, Michael Gilbert ha scritto: > Those are just guidelines, right? Yes they are, the purpose of developers-reference is to provide an overview of the recommended procedures. Cheers, Giuseppe signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: RFS: bareftp (NMU, RC bugfix)
On 10/06/2010 08:23 PM, gustavo panizzo wrote: > The upload would fix these bugs: 598284 > security related bug, CVE-2010-3350 I've uploaded your package, thanks for your work. Cheers, Giuseppe. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
