Bug#369890: silo: build-depends on gcc-2.95, which may be removed for etch

2006-06-08 Thread Frans Pop
On Thursday 08 June 2006 09:08, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> I've prepared updated silo package (patch attached), including a fix
> for this bug. It has been updated to the latest available upstream,
> built with gcc-4.1 in pbuilder, and tested on both sparc32 and sparc64.

> +++ b/debian/control  2006-06-07 23:02:30.0 -0700
[...]
> +Build-Depends: e2fslibs-dev (>= 1.28-1), debhelper (>= 5.0), gcc-4.1,
^^^
> bzip2, sparc-utils, perl 

Shouldn't silo just depend on "current gcc" instead of on an explicit 
version no that the need to depend on 2.95 is gone?


pgp69xQRcoygu.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#373567: etch d-i i386 beta 2 failed to finish installation correctly

2006-06-14 Thread Frans Pop
On Wednesday 14 June 2006 13:51, Frans Pop wrote:
> This is probably the result of prebaseconfig being removed from testing
> and being replaced by finish-install.

Hmm. Looks like the finish-install postinst uses sort in a way unsupported 
by the busybox version used in beta2 initrds...

main-menu[3044]: (process:23199): sort 
main-menu[3044]: (process:23199):  -n 
main-menu[3044]: (process:23199):  -k3 
main-menu[3044]: (process:23199):  -t/ 
main-menu[3044]: (process:23199):  
main-menu[3044]: (process:23199): sort: invalid option -- k 
main-menu[3044]: (process:23199): BusyBox v1.01 (Debian 1:1.01-4) 
multi-call binary 
main-menu[3044]: (process:23199):  
main-menu[3044]: (process:23199): Usage: sort [-n] [FILE]... 


pgpYHZUQHykyQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#366504: vim-runtime: Overwrites /usr/share/vim/vimcurrent in vim-common

2006-06-14 Thread Frans Pop
Hi,

I'm not sure if this bug is really totally fixed now, although I'm seeing
it in reverse...

During an upgrade today of an unstable box that had not been updated in a
while, I got the following situation:

Preparing to replace vim 1:6.4-007+1 (using .../vim_1%3a7.0-017+5_sparc.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement vim ...
Preparing to replace vim-common 1:6.4-007+1 (using 
.../vim-common_1%3a7.0-017+5_sparc.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement vim-common ...
dpkg: error processing 
/var/cache/apt/archives/vim-common_1%3a7.0-017+5_sparc.deb (--unpack):
 trying to overwrite `/usr/share/vim/vimcurrent', which is also in package 
vim-runtime
dpkg: considering removing vim-common in favour of vim-runtime ...
dpkg: yes, will remove vim-common in favour of vim-runtime.
Preparing to replace vim-runtime 1:6.4-007+1 (using 
.../vim-runtime_1%3a7.0-017+5_all.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement vim-runtime ...
[...]
Errors were encountered while processing:
 /var/cache/apt/archives/vim-common_1%3a7.0-017+5_sparc.deb
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
A package failed to install.  Trying to recover:
[...]
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of vim:
 vim depends on vim-common (= 1:7.0-017+5); however:
  Package vim-common is not installed.
dpkg: error processing vim (--configure):
 dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
[...]
Setting up vim-runtime (7.0-017+5) ...
[...]
Errors were encountered while processing:
 vim
Press return to continue.


This left vim in a broken state. Running aptitude again did solve the
problem:

Unpacking vim-common (from .../vim-common_1%3a7.0-017+5_sparc.deb) ...
Setting up vim-common (7.0-017+5) ...
Installing new version of config file /etc/vim/vimrc ...

Setting up vim (7.0-017+5) ...
rmdir: /usr/share/doc/vim: Directory not empty

Press return to continue.


All in all not a very clean upgrade.

Cheers,
FJP

P.S. Note that this bug is closed. I'll leave it to you if you want to
reopen based on this report.


pgpL5F2QOdwlu.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#373567: etch d-i i386 beta 2 failed to finish installation correctly

2006-06-14 Thread Frans Pop
On Wednesday 14 June 2006 20:19, Bastian Blank wrote:
> The version in unstable support it.

Ack. Otherwise the bug would have also shown in daily builds...

This does not help with this BR though which concerns images built using 
Beta2 initrds which contain an older version of busybox.

So, even though the busybox udeb has (accidentally) migrated to testing 
now, any Beta2 images that load finish-install from the mirrors will 
break as they were built using the previous busybox.


pgpaROc8b0Qw7.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#361872: debconf-copydb: Trashes debconf database in /target

2006-06-15 Thread Frans Pop
On Sunday 11 June 2006 20:04, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> I'm unable to reproduce this with 0.102 in a normal (ie. non-d-i)
> environment:

I can still reproduce the problem during an installation though...

> configdb is here set up to be my normal debconf database (so I have
> some source data to test with), but I can't understand why this would
> work outside d-i but not from pkgsel... any ideas?

I have a few very wild ideas, but no idea how valid they are.

One idea is the encoding (installer is running with nl_NL.UTF8, although 
the pkgsel postinst sets and exports LANG=C).
Another is busybox.
A third is the way debconf-copydb is called within d-i; maybe broken 
handling if the target is target_configdb?

The full call is:
  debconf-copydb -p \
 "^(debian-installer/language|debian-installer/country|
debian-installer/keymap|passwd/username)$" \
 configdb target_configdb


pgpTwCoUpSRnT.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#361872: debconf-copydb: Trashes debconf database in /target

2006-06-15 Thread Frans Pop
On Thursday 15 June 2006 21:33, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> > Another is busybox.
>
> How would this influence anything?

Told you they were _wild_ guesses ;-)

> Do you have a copy of the source and target databases, as well as the
> cdebconf.conf used? It might be something specific about the data in
> the destination that makes cdebconf discard it...

The relevant files (hope the filenames speak for themselves) and an strace 
are available from:
http://people.debian.org/~fjp/d-i/debconf-copydb.tgz
(uploaded instead of attached because of size)

If you want other files too, just ask. I have the testcase saved in 
vmware.

Thanks for looking into this.


pgpWxx5h0nTGO.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#350444: partman-auto-lvm: Creates two /boot partitions if the scheme already contains one

2006-01-29 Thread Frans Pop
Package: partman-auto-lvm
Version: 8
Severity: serious

While testing partman-auto-lvm on sparc, which has default /boot partition 
in its schemes, partman-auto-lvm created two /boot partitions.

Reason is that the following line is broken:
  if ! echo $normalscheme | grep -eq "[[:space:]]/boot[[:space:]]"; then
this should be:
  if ! echo "$normalscheme" | grep -q "[[:space:]]/boot[[:space:]]"; then


pgpeX3lHGPLIO.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#350797: openjade: Fails on entity definitions in xml-iso-entities-*

2006-01-31 Thread Frans Pop
Package: openjade
Version: 1.4devel1-15
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

I normally build the Debian Installation Guide in a Sarge environment,
except when I upload the package.

In current unstable the build of the PDF version of the manual fails
when openjade is being run:
/usr/bin/openjade -t tex -b utf-8 -o build.tmp/install.en.tex \
 -d 
/home/fjp/projects/manual-build/manual/build/stylesheets/style-print.dsl \
 -V tex-backend build.tmp/install.en.profiled.xml
/usr/bin/openjade:/usr/share/xml/docbook/schema/dtd/4.2/docbookx.dtd:112:17:E: 
"X20AC" is not a function name
/usr/bin/openjade:/usr/share/xml/entities/xml-iso-entities-8879.1986/ISOamsa.ent:40:19:E:
 "X21B6" is not a function name
/usr/bin/openjade:/usr/share/xml/entities/xml-iso-entities-8879.1986/ISOamsa.ent:41:19:E:
 "X21B7" is not a function name
/usr/bin/openjade:/usr/share/xml/entities/xml-iso-entities-8879.1986/ISOamsa.ent:42:17:E:
 "X21D3" is not a function name
[... continues for all entities in xml-iso-entities* files...] 

There have been a lot of changes recently in TeX as well, so maybe the
root of the problem is there; I really have no idea.
This problem did not exist on Januari 2, which is when I last uploaded
the Installation Guide. Please let me know if I can provide any further
information.

I will try downgrading and follow up if I get useful results.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-em64t-p4-smp
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages openjade depends on:
ii  libc6   2.3.5-12 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libgcc1 1:4.0.2-8GCC support library
ii  libosp5 1.5.2-1  Runtime library for OpenJade group
ii  libostyle1c21.4devel1-15 Runtime libraries for OpenJade
ii  libstdc++6  4.0.2-8  The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  sgml-base   1.26 SGML infrastructure and SGML catal

openjade recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#350797: openjade: Fails on entity definitions in xml-iso-entities-*

2006-01-31 Thread Frans Pop
After downgrading the following three packages, the build completes
without errors again:
ii  libosp4c2  1.5.1.0-4  Runtime library for OpenJade group's SP suite
ii  libostyle1c2   1.4devel1-14   Runtime libraries for OpenJade
ii  openjade   1.4devel1-14   Implementation of the DSSSL language

(Note:
Not downgrading libostyle1c2 resulted in the following error:
/usr/bin/openjade: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/libostyle.so.1: undefined 
symbol: _ZN6OpenSP17StorageObjectSpecaSERKS0_
Error: build of pdf failed with error code 127
)

Hope this helps.


pgpOypb7LwRVb.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#346085: Please fix outstanding afbinit bugs

2006-02-01 Thread Frans Pop
On Wednesday 01 February 2006 07:14, Ben Collins wrote:
> > I'm bumping the severity up a bit. It would be very nice to upload a
> > new afbinit, fixing this bug and #250619.
>
> Would be even nice if I could do the upload. Someone will have to NMU
> it.

Will do.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#350797: openjade: Fails on entity definitions in xml-iso-entities-*

2006-02-01 Thread Frans Pop
severity 350797 minor
thanks

Thanks for your quick reaction.

On Wednesday 01 February 2006 04:26, you wrote:
> The problem is that in order to resolve a long standing performance
> problem, I turned off DTDDECL handling in the the libosp5 package on
> which openjade depends.  What this means is that you need to explicitly
> specify the XML declaration before the document:
>
> /usr/bin/openjade -t tex -b utf-8 -o build.tmp/install.en.tex \
>-d 
> /home/fjp/projects/manual-build/manual/build/stylesheets/style-print.dsl \
>-V tex-backend declaration/xml.dcl build.tmp/install.en.profiled.xml
>   ^^^

This works for me.

> This is a reversion back to an older (pre-Sarge) form of the command. 
> I think this is a small price to pay for the huge performance gain (a
> factor of 10-20), but let me know if it is not an option for you; if
> so, I'll consider reinstating the behavior as it was in Sarge.

Please consider documenting this change in NEWS.Debian with your next upload.
Leaving the report open for that.

The performance gain is indeed impressive. Here are some results for the
Installation Guide:

$ time ./buildone.sh i386 en pdf
Info: creating temporary profiled .xml file...
Info: creating temporary .tex file...
Info: creating temporary .dvi file...
Info: creating .pdf file...

real0m45.286s
user0m43.041s
sys 0m2.427s



$ time ./buildone.sh i386 en pdf
Info: creating temporary profiled .xml file...
Info: creating temporary .tex file...
Info: creating temporary .dvi file...
Info: creating .pdf file...

real0m24.491s
user0m24.252s
sys 0m0.451s


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#346085: Patch as applied in NMU

2006-02-01 Thread Frans Pop
Here's the full patch that I applied. This includes an update of debhelper 
compatibility.

Cheers,
FJP

diff -u afbinit-1.0/debian/changelog afbinit-1.0/debian/changelog
--- afbinit-1.0/debian/changelog
+++ afbinit-1.0/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+afbinit (1.0-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Non Maintainer Upload.
+  * Change the mmap() of the card's registers to use MAP_SHARED instead
+of MAP_PRIVATE. Closes: #346085.
+  * Update debhelper compatibitily to version 5.
+
+ -- Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Wed,  1 Feb 2006 14:20:57 +0100
+
 afbinit (1.0-1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Initial Release.
diff -u afbinit-1.0/debian/rules afbinit-1.0/debian/rules
--- afbinit-1.0/debian/rules
+++ afbinit-1.0/debian/rules
@@ -1,7 +1,5 @@
 #!/usr/bin/make -f
 
-export DH_COMPAT=3
-
 build: build-stamp
 build-stamp:
 	dh_testdir
diff -u afbinit-1.0/debian/control afbinit-1.0/debian/control
--- afbinit-1.0/debian/control
+++ afbinit-1.0/debian/control
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 Section: contrib/utils
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 3.0.0)
+Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 5.0.0)
 Standards-Version: 3.5.2
 
 Package: afbinit
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- afbinit-1.0.orig/afbinit.c
+++ afbinit-1.0/afbinit.c
@@ -236,7 +236,7 @@
 	/* MMAP the registers. */
 	uregs = mmap(0, 0x2000,
 		 PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
-		 MAP_PRIVATE,
+		 MAP_SHARED,
 		 afb_fd,
 		 0x0400);
 	if (uregs == (void *)-1L) {
@@ -246,7 +246,7 @@
 
 	kregs = mmap(0, 0x2000,
 		 PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
-		 MAP_PRIVATE,
+		 MAP_SHARED,
 		 afb_fd,
 		 0x0bc04000);
 	if (kregs == (void *)-1L) {
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- afbinit-1.0.orig/debian/compat
+++ afbinit-1.0/debian/compat
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+5


pgpyyP6SMgVHe.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#345931: grub 0.97 doesn't work on several machines

2006-02-06 Thread Frans Pop
retitle 345931 System fails to boot after updating boot sector from grub 
interactive shell
thanks

I have managed to reproduce this in vmware using the following procedure:
- new Sarge install (has grub 0.95+cvs20040624-17)
- change sources list to unstable and upgrade

After grub is upgraded (to 0.97-4), but without re-installing its boot sector,
the system reboots without problem.

Now there are two methods to reinstall the grub boot sector to the new
version.

1) Run the grub-install script
# grub-install /dev/sda1
Installation finished. No error reported.
This is the contents of the device map /boot/grub/device.map.
Check if this is correct or not. If any of the lines is incorrect,
fix it and re-run the script 'grub-install'.

(hd0) /dev/sda
# reboot
=> system reboots without any problems

2) Run the grub shell interactively as in the original report
# grub
grub> find /boot/grub/menu.lst
 (hd0,0)
grub> root (hd0,0)
 Filesystem type is ext2fs, partition type 0x83
grub> setup (hd0)

 Checking if "/boot/grub/stage1" exists... no
 Checking if "/grub/stage1" exists... yes
 Checking if "/grub/stage2" exists... yes
 Checking if "/grub/e2fs_stage1_5" exists... yes
 Running "embed /grub/e2fs_stage1_5 (hd0)"...  16 sectors are embedded.
succeeded
 Running "install /grub/stage1 (hd0) (hd0)1+16 p (hd0,0)/grub/stage2
/grub/menu..lst"... succeeded
Done.
grub> quit

# reboot
=> Grub menu is not shown (screen remains blank); system fails to boot

Conclusions:
- grub-install does the right thing
- the setup command in the grub interactive shell checks if the stage files
  exist, but apparently its setup command fails to check if they are
  compatible with the current version of grub

I will keep the image I created this way in vmware for a while in case
additional information is wanted.

Cheers,
Frans Pop


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#351692: mips-tools doesn't build on powerpc and hppa

2006-02-06 Thread Frans Pop
On Monday 06 February 2006 22:25, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > architecture.mk convert the architecture name in case the name in
> > Debian and the name in the kernel tree is different, which is the
> > case for powerpc (ppc), and hppa (parisc).
>
> Manoj, maybe you can take a look at the build failures on powerpc and
> hppa at
> http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=&pkg=kernel-patch-2.4.27-mips

I seem to remember that this was restructured fairly recently by Sven for 
official kernel builds. Apparently it was not taken into account that 
other packages might use the same files...

I would guess that mips-tools will need to adapt to the new setup.


pgpIIuU7gfdQM.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#347479: Seems to not handle VG creation correctly

2006-02-07 Thread Frans Pop
tags 347479 + patch
thanks

The attached patch adds some basic checks so we do not "just go ahead" in 
situations the code is not ready to handle. Basically, partman-auto-lvm 
will now fail if the device selected for autopartioning already contains 
an LVM physical device.
Also, the check if the name for the volume group is already in use has 
been improved.

This patch introduces some new templates and may thus show untranslated 
messages if included in Beta2. However, the new strings are only shown on 
error situations and should not come into play during most installations 
using partman-auto-lvm.

Comments on the patch very welcome.

diff -Naurd partman-auto-lvm-9.orig/automatically_partition/some_device_lvm/do_option partman-auto-lvm-9/automatically_partition/some_device_lvm/do_option
--- partman-auto-lvm-9.orig/automatically_partition/some_device_lvm/do_option	2006-01-29 19:33:38.0 +0100
+++ partman-auto-lvm-9/automatically_partition/some_device_lvm/do_option	2006-02-01 11:53:19.0 +0100
@@ -96,11 +96,17 @@
 db_get partman-auto-lvm/new_vg_name
 VG_name="$RET"
 
-if VG_create "$VG_name" $pv_devices; then break; fi
+# check if the volume group name is not in use
+if [ -z "$(VG_list | grep "$VG_name")" ]; then break; fi
 noninteractive="exit 1"
 done
 
-perform_recipe_by_lvm $VG_name $recipe
+if VG_create "$VG_name" $pv_devices; then
+  perform_recipe_by_lvm $VG_name $recipe
+else
+  ## should we show an error message here?
+  exit 1
+fi
 
 # default to accepting the autopartitioning
 menudir_default_choice /lib/partman/choose_partition finish finish || true


pgpu9fJQuSoHj.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#347479: Seems to not handle VG creation correctly

2006-02-07 Thread Frans Pop
On Tuesday 07 February 2006 18:31, you wrote:
> The attached patch adds some basic checks so we do not "just go ahead"

Sorry. Attached the wrong patch. This one is better.

Index: automatically_partition/some_device_lvm/do_option
===
--- automatically_partition/some_device_lvm/do_option	(revision 34764)
+++ automatically_partition/some_device_lvm/do_option	(working copy)
@@ -5,12 +5,33 @@
 . /lib/partman/lvm_tools.sh
 . /lib/partman/auto-shared.sh
 
+bail_out() {
+db_input critical partman-auto-lvm/$1 || true
+db_go || true
+exit 1
+}
+
+
 dev=$1
 
 [ -f $dev/size ] || exit 1
 free_size=$(cat $dev/size)
 free_size=$(expr 000"$free_size" : '0*\(..*\)..$') # convert to megabytes
 
+# be sure the modules are loaded
+modprobe dm-mod >/dev/null 2>&1 || true
+modprobe lvm-mod >/dev/null 2>&1 || true
+
+if type update-dev >/dev/null 2>&1; then
+log-output -t update-dev update-dev
+fi
+
+# check if the device already contains any physical volumes
+realdev=$(mapdevfs "$(cat $dev/device)")
+if PV_list | grep -q "$realdev" ; then
+bail_out pv_on_device
+fi
+
 # we need to be sure we can perform the selected receipe and be able to add /boot.
 # virtually remove 200Mb from the free space. Perhaps a reiteration over the recipe
 # would be more accurate, but for now this is more than fine.
@@ -26,9 +47,7 @@
 
 # check if the recipe contains lvmok tags otherwise fail
 if [ -z "$(echo "$scheme" | grep "lvmok")" ]; then
-	db_input critical partman-auto-lvm/unusable_recipe || true
-	db_go || true
-	exit 1
+	bail_out unusable_recipe
 fi
 
 ### situation:
@@ -74,14 +93,6 @@
 
  now we have the container! yeppa!!! 
 
-# be sure the modules are loaded
-modprobe dm-mod >/dev/null 2>&1 || true
-modprobe lvm-mod >/dev/null 2>&1 || true
-
-if type update-dev >/dev/null 2>&1; then
-log-output -t update-dev update-dev
-fi
-
 # lvm doesn't like devfs paths.
 for pv in $devfspv_devices; do
 realpath="$(mapdevfs "$pv")"
@@ -96,11 +107,17 @@
 db_get partman-auto-lvm/new_vg_name
 VG_name="$RET"
 
-if VG_create "$VG_name" $pv_devices; then break; fi
-noninteractive="exit 1"
+# check if the volume group name is not in use
+if [ -z "$(VG_list | grep " $VG_name${TAB}")" ]; then break; fi
+noninteractive="bail_out vg_exists"
+db_register partman-auto-lvm/new_vg_name_exists partman-auto-lvm/new_vg_name
 done
 
-perform_recipe_by_lvm $VG_name $recipe
+if VG_create "$VG_name" $pv_devices; then
+perform_recipe_by_lvm $VG_name $recipe
+else
+bail_out vg_create_error
+fi
 
 # default to accepting the autopartitioning
 menudir_default_choice /lib/partman/choose_partition finish finish || true
Index: debian/partman-auto-lvm.templates
===
--- debian/partman-auto-lvm.templates	(revision 34764)
+++ debian/partman-auto-lvm.templates	(working copy)
@@ -11,8 +11,35 @@
 Default: Debian
 _Description: Name of the volume group for the new system:
 
+Template: partman-auto-lvm/new_vg_name_exists
+Type: string
+_Description: Name of the volume group for the new system:
+ The name selected for the volume group is already in use on your system.
+ Please enter a different name.
+
 Template: partman-auto-lvm/unusable_recipe
 Type: error
 _Description: Failed to partition the selected disk
  This happened because the selected recipe does not contain any partition
  that can be created on LVM volumes.
+
+Template: partman-auto-lvm/pv_on_device
+Type: error
+_Description: Selected device already contains a physical volume
+ The device you selected already contains one or more physical volumes. It
+ is not possible to automatically partition the device using LVM.
+
+Template: partman-auto-lvm/vg_exists
+Type: error
+_Description: Volume group name already in use
+ The volume group name used to automatically partition using LVM is already
+ in use. It is possible to specify an alternative name by running the
+ installation at medium or low priority.
+
+Template: partman-auto-lvm/vg_create_error
+Type: error
+_Description: Unexpected error while creating volume group
+ Autopartitioning using LVM failed because an error occurred while creating
+ the volume group.
+ .
+ Check /var/log/syslog or see virtual console 4 for the details.
Index: debian/changelog
===
--- debian/changelog	(revision 34764)
+++ debian/changelog	(working copy)
@@ -1,9 +1,11 @@
 partman-auto-lvm (9) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
 
   * Fix code that checks if a /boot partition is already present in the
-selected scheme. Closes: #350444. 
+selected scheme. Closes: #350444.
+  * Improve handling

Bug#351871: sysvinit: installs incorrect default /etc/inittab for S/390

2006-02-07 Thread Frans Pop
Package: sysvinit
Severity: serious
Version: 2.86.ds1-11
Tags: d-i, patch

S/390 has for a long time not been installable due to an issue with parted 
support, so I guess that's why nobody noticed this before.
After installing a new system, the system fails to boot correctly. After 
cron is started, messages appear:
 INIT: Id "[1-6]" respawning too fast: disabled for 5 minutes
 INIT: no more processes left in this runlevel

Reason is that a "regular" inittab is installed instead of the special 
S/390 one for dumb terminal.

The problem has probably been there since:
sysvinit (2.83-2) unstable; urgency=high
  * Install inittab.$(arch) as default inittab in the installation
process, if it exists. Add inittab.s390 (closes: #113495)

In the source we have:
debian/share/inittab.s390-linux

However:
$ dpkg-architecture -qDEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE
s390-linux-gnu

So, please rename inittab.s390-linux to inittab.s390-linux-gnu.
This should solve the problem.

A prompt upload with high urgency would be very much appreciated as we're 
currently preparing the Etch Beta2 release of Debian Installer and this 
is the only issue keeping S/390 from being supported again in this 
release.

Cheers,
Frans Pop


pgp73xxw1lQTH.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#347479: Seems to not handle VG creation correctly

2006-02-08 Thread Frans Pop
On Wednesday 08 February 2006 22:07, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Well, even though I'm not fond of new strings so late in the release
> process, I guess we can't avoid it (I wouldn't say so if this was a
> real final release with a hard string freeze).

I agree, but as:
- this is a new component
- it really improves error handling in a critical component (partitioning
  can easily destroy data after all)
- the templates are very unlikely to be shown anyway
- we are not really in a string freeze
I think we need to do this. We can wait a few days for translations, but 
IMO should _not_ press translators to update.

> Proposal:
> _Description: Existing physical volume in the selected device
>  LVM cannot automatically partition devices which already contain
>  one or more more physical volumes.

There is a big difference between "LVM cannot autopartion" and 
"Autopartitioning using LVM is not possible" though...

I'll think of something.

> > +Template: partman-auto-lvm/vg_exists
> > +Type: error
> > +_Description: Volume group name already in use
> > + The volume group name used to automatically partition using LVM is
> > + already in use. It is possible to specify an alternative name by
> > + running the installation at medium or low priority.
>
> Fineeven though I'm not fond of referring to another package which
> could cause consistency problems in the future if something is changed
> regarding priorities.

Hm? Which other package?
It's just that the question is not asked at high/critical priority with 
current code. Alternative of course would be to scratch that and, if 
there is a name conflict, always ask the user to enter an alternative 
name for the VG (i.e. at critical priority). I thought of doing that, but 
did not really want to change current functionality at this moment.

Thanks for your comments.


pgp2JvEx3GNhX.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#364217: klibc: [sparc] run-init: statfs /: invalid parameter (again)

2006-04-21 Thread Frans Pop
Package: klibc
Severity: serious
Version: 1.3.3-3

After an upgrade in unstable on sparc a reboot resulted in:
run-init: statfs /: invalid parameter

I'm inclined to blame klibc as that was also the cause the previous time 
(#347902), but everything involved was upgraded. From /var/log/aptitude:

[UPGRADE] klibc-utils 1.2.4-1 -> 1.3.3-3
[UPGRADE] libklibc 1.2.4-1 -> 1.3.3-3
[UPGRADE] initramfs-tools 0.59b -> 0.60
[UPGRADE] linux-image-2.6.16-1-sparc64 2.6.16-6 -> 2.6.16-8

As you can see I skipped a few upgrades, so I'm not sure where the 
regression started.


pgphedAbfd77h.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#365418: console-tools: new console-screen.sh fails to start on S/390

2006-04-29 Thread Frans Pop
Package: console-tools
Version: 0.2.3dbs-61
Severity: serious

Upgrade of console-tools (and therefore console-common) fails because
console-screen.sh throws an error when started:

$ ./console-screen.sh start || echo "FAIL $?"
+ '[' -r /etc/console-tools/config ']'
+ . /etc/console-tools/config
++ BLANK_TIME=30
++ BLANK_DPMS=off
++ POWERDOWN_TIME=30
+ '[' -d /etc/console-tools/config.d ']'
+ PATH=/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin
+ SETFONT=/usr/bin/consolechars
+ SETFONT_OPT=
+ CHARSET=/usr/bin/charset
+ VCSTIME=/usr/sbin/vcstime
++ uname -r
++ cut -f 2 -d .
+ '[' 4 = 6 ']'
+ VCSTIME_OPT=
+ '[' -d /dev/vc ']'
+ DEVICE_PREFIX=/dev/tty
+ case "$1" in
+ setup
+ '[' -x /usr/bin/consolechars ']'
+ VT=no
++ fgconsole
+ CONSOLE_TYPE=
+ return
FAIL 1

Replacing:
# If we can't access the console, quit
CONSOLE_TYPE=`fgconsole 2>/dev/null` || return
with:
# If we can't access the console, quit
CONSOLE_TYPE=`fgconsole 2>/dev/null` || return 0
may fix the problem.

Note that there are other cases as well where "|| return" is used.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: s390
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-2-s390
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages console-tools depends on:
pn  console-common (no description available)
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]  1.5.0 Debian configuration management sy
ii  libc6  2.3.6-7   GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libconsole 1:0.2.3dbs-61 Shared libraries for Linux console
ii  sysvinit   2.86.ds1-14   System-V-like init utilities

Versions of packages console-tools recommends:
ii  console-data  20060421   Keymaps, fonts, charset maps, fall

-- no debconf information


pgpHD3UpA6HPH.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#362800: debian-installer: cd-rom installer requires online repository

2006-05-04 Thread Frans Pop
On Thursday 04 May 2006 13:17, you wrote:
> Frans Pop say that this bug is done in images after 15/04/2006, but I
> burn the 3 *DVDs* of Debian Etch (17/04/2006) and I found the same
> problem: The installer work ONLY with internet conection (online
> repository is necessary!) I try use workarround available in ERRATA,
> but don't work in version of day 17/04/2006 (images DVD)... the oprion
> "Ignore" don't appear!
> This bug is done in *DVD* images of Debian Etch?

I'm very sorry, but after the fix I did on April 16, it turned out another 
fix was needed. This meant that the images of 17-4 were also broken, 
which was documented on:
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/Today

If you download the new DVD, I would suggest you start with only the first 
one. That should contain all software you are likely to use. DVD 2 and 3 
contain software that is much less commonly used.

Sorry for the confusion.

Good luck,
Frans Pop


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#367783: busybox-udeb: segfaults on 'tr'

2006-05-17 Thread Frans Pop
Package: busybox-udeb
Version: 1:1.1.2-1
Severity: critical

# echo "Create" | tr '[A-Z]' '[a-z]'
Segmentation fault


pgpuZaaO4XE6d.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#340935: netcfg: hotplugging interfaces no longer works; no network after reboot

2005-11-26 Thread Frans Pop
Package: netcfg
Version: 1.17
Severity: serious
Justification: Makes package unsuitable for release

Now that udev is enabled in d-i for kernel 2.6.14, regular interfaces get 
recognized as being "hotpluggable".

However, as udev no longer uses hotplug, the current configuration set up 
by netcfg no longer works for hotplugging interfaces.
Reason is that ifup is no longer called as (AFAICT)
   ifup eth0=hotplug
but rather
   ifup --allow=hotplug eth0

This results in the system having no external networking after the reboot. 
I see this for example in a default vmware installation that has a 
pcnet32 eth0 interface.

After some testing I've determined that the following configuration (in
/etc/network/interfaces) does work:

mapping eth0
script grep
map eth0

allow-hotplug eth0
iface eth0 inet dhcp


NOTE: I'm not sure if this is the correct/optimal solution.

This new config will probably not work if package hotplug _is_ installed. 
Question is if netcfg should also still support that situation.

Can a configuration be found that will work for both situations?


pgpVaKSWQANt0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#340935: Netcfg - hotplugging config no longer works with 2.6.14 + udev

2005-11-27 Thread Frans Pop
Hi Thomas,

I've seen that you were involved in the part of netcfg that sets this up.
With 2.6.14 and udev enabled, normal interfaces are now recognized as 
hotpluggable. This works fine during installation, but the interface does 
not come up after reboot.

I've put the details in [1]. Could you please have a look at that?

It's rather a blocker for the new daily images, so if we cannot find a 
proper solution soon, I think we'll have to temporarily disable the 
hotplugging config (which should be fairly easy to to).

Colin Watson also pointed me to some preliminary ideas for Ubuntu 
regarding this [2], but I'm not sure that also applies for Debian.

Cheers,
Frans Pop

[1] http://bugs.debian.org/340935
[2] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/NetworkMagic


pgp1MQ11QL9G9.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#341286: mismatch between the kernel used by installer and included in the archive

2005-11-29 Thread Frans Pop
reassign 341286 installation-reports
severity 341286 normal
tags 341286 - d-i sid
thanks

On Tuesday 29 November 2005 22:07, Jeffrey Hundstad wrote:
> 1. put cd-rom '20051128 "sid" - fsn.hu unofficial i386 Binary-1' in
> drive

Please let us know the full URL including filename of the image you used 
for the installation.

In general the problem you see occurs on network or floppy based 
installations and not CD based installations. For CDs the problem cannot 
really occur, unless maybe there are problems reading it.
Can you see anything in the logs to indicate this (switch to VT2 and check 
the output of 'dmesg' and contents (using nano) of /var/log/syslog)?

Thanks.
Frans Pop


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#341392: linux-2.6: kernel BUG at mm/slab.c:1807!

2005-11-30 Thread Frans Pop
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.14-4
Severity: serious

The following error happens on Debian Installer boot in vmware (386 kernel).
This problem was not present in -3.

The system does come up after the error, but it looks so basic (memory
management AFAICT) that I've set RC severity anyway.
Feel free to adjust if you disagree.

Cheers,
FJP

ACPI: Processor [CPU0] (supports 8 throttling states)
kmem_cache_create: duplicate cache UNIX
[ cut here ]
kernel BUG at mm/slab.c:1807!
invalid operand:  [#1]
Modules linked in: unix thermal processor fan pcnet32 mii uhci_hcd usbcore
CPU:0
EIP:0060:[]Not tainted VLI
EFLAGS: 00010202   (2.6.14-2-386)
EIP is at kmem_cache_create+0x4ea/0x64c
eax: 002b   ebx: c9c26b4c   ecx: c02f8080   edx: 206b
esi: c0303829   edi: ca86fde9   ebp: c9c26980   esp: c988ff38
ds: 007b   es: 007b   ss: 0068
Process modprobe (pid: 1605, threadinfo=c988e000 task=c98c8a70)
Stack: c02ba8f8 ca86fde4 000a c9a957a0 c9c2699c ff80 0080 c000
   0080 ca870080 ca86fd60 0804e154 ca86fde4 c02410d2 ca86fde4 015c
    2000   ca804000 ca870080 0804e190 0804e154
Call Trace:
 [] proto_register+0x56/0x1b4
 [] af_unix_init+0x0/0x5f [unix]
 [] af_unix_init+0xd/0x5f [unix]
 [] sys_init_module+0x99/0x16c
 [] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
Code: c9 fc ff ff 55 e8 0f 0e 00 00 59 e9 a9 fd ff ff 90 ff 74 24 30 68 f8 a8 
2b c0 e8 6e b3
 fd ff ff 05 4c 16 39 c0 0f 8e cb 15 00 00 <0f> 0b 0f 07 0d a0 2b c0 58 5a e9 
d7 fd ff ff b8
 00 e0 ff ff 21
 <6>usbcore: registered new driver usbkbd
drivers/usb/input/usbkbd.c: :USB HID Boot Protocol keyboard driver
usbcore: registered new driver hiddev
usbcore: registered new driver usbhid


pgpWM4oRz0j8X.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#339711: Severely broken on sparc

2005-12-03 Thread Frans Pop
found 339711 2.0pl5-19.3
thanks

Sam, thanks for working on this.

I'm afraid the NMU has not fixed the problem on sparc though.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dpkg -l dhcp-client
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed
|/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ Name  Version   Description
+++-=-=-==
ii  dhcp-client   2.0pl5-19.3   DHCP Client

$ sudo dhclient
Internet Software Consortium DHCP Client 2.0pl5
Copyright 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999 The Internet Software Consortium.
All rights reserved.

Please contribute if you find this software useful.
For info, please visit http://www.isc.org/dhcp-contrib.html

sit0: unknown hardware address type 776
sit0: unknown hardware address type 776
Listening on LPF/sit0/
Sending on   LPF/sit0/
Listening on LPF/lo/
Sending on   LPF/lo/
Listening on LPF/eth0/08:00:20:9c:14:f5
Sending on   LPF/eth0/08:00:20:9c:14:f5
Sending on   Socket/fallback/fallback-net
DHCPDISCOVER on sit0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 3
DHCPDISCOVER on lo to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 5
DHCPDISCOVER on eth0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 8
receive_packet failed on eth0: Network is down
Bus error

This while working in an ssh session from another system, so the network
obviously is anything but down :-)


pgpscOHkxXvMu.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#339711: Severely broken on sparc

2005-12-03 Thread Frans Pop
On Saturday 03 December 2005 15:49, Frans Pop wrote:
> Sam, thanks for working on this.
>
> I'm afraid the NMU has not fixed the problem on sparc though.

I've found the cause. One patch had an extention ".diff" instead of 
".patch" and because of that was not applied.

I've uploaded (NMU) a new version fixing that.

Cheers,
FJP


pgp3bulOOhwQP.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#341878: segfault on alpha, sparc

2005-12-03 Thread Frans Pop
close 341878 1.22
thanks

Bug arrived after fix had already been uploaded, therefore closing this 
way.

On Saturday 03 December 2005 21:03, Joey Hess wrote:
> Daily build install is failing like this on alpha, and I think on sparc
> as well:

No, it does not affect Sparc. Problem was that in some cases default 
keyboard arch was still being set to "none" even though that template had 
been removed and replaced by "skip-config" and "no-keyboard".


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#342028: gtk+2.0-directfb: FTBFS on mips and mipsel

2005-12-04 Thread Frans Pop
Package: gtk+2.0-directfb
Version: 2.0.9.2-12
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS

The package fails to build on these two architectures with the same error:
gdkpango.c: In function 'gdk_draw_layout_line_with_colors':
gdkpango.c:307: warning: enumeration value 'PANGO_UNDERLINE_ERROR' not 
handled in switch
gdkpango.c:350: internal compiler error: Floating point exception

This build failure is also blocking cdebconf from building on these 
architectures.


pgpizU4WTNy36.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#342030: parted: FTBFS on mips and mipsel

2005-12-04 Thread Frans Pop
Package: parted
Version: 1.6.25.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS

The package fails to build on these two architectures with the same error:
../../../libparted/fs_hfs/advfs.c: In function 'hfs_read_bad_blocks':
../../../libparted/fs_hfs/advfs.c:241: internal compiler error: Floating 
point exception


pgpAK1EpNXRYr.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#342030: parted: FTBFS on mips and mipsel

2005-12-04 Thread Frans Pop
Thiemo Seufer replied to #342028 (similar error for gtk+2.0-directfb):
"From the symptom I expect this to be fixed in gcc-4.0 4.0.2-4."

Possibly this is valid for parted too.
I understand that rebuilds are already being scheduled.

[23:12:11]  ths: So, just ask buildd admins to schedule a rebuild?
[23:12:39]  fjp: Neuro has btw. the list of all such failures and 
plans to use them as testcase for the redundancy buildds.


pgpa1sgUTaaSX.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#341392: kernel BUG at mm/slab.c:1807!

2005-12-05 Thread Frans Pop
On Tuesday 06 December 2005 05:23, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> It's not kernel's fault. I have just booted the 2.6.14 off today's
> sid_d-i daily netinst, and it has the bug. The bug appears because the
> af_unix_init function is invoked twice, and it normally should not
> happen. This function is the init function for the unix domain socket
> driver, which we have recently started compiling into the kernel, so
> that the corresponding module (unix.ko) is no longer shipped in kernel
> packages. It is not present in linux-image-2.6.14-2-{386,686} packages
> (version 2.6.14-4) as you can easily check. However, somehow this
> unix.ko module ends up in the installer initrd anyway, as
>
> /lib/modules/2.6.14-2-386/kernel/net/unix/unix.ko

Good catch Jurij.

This looks to be a serious bug in kernel-wedge as it seems a module from a 
previous kernel version is included when that module is not present for 
the kernel version for which udebs are being built.


pgp5YkqzIV2eb.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#341392: RM: socket-modules-2.6.14-2-386-di - obsolete and causing problems

2005-12-06 Thread Frans Pop
reassign 341392 ftp.debian.org
retitle 341392 Please remove obsoleted socket-modules-2.6.14-2-386-di
thanks

On Tuesday 06 December 2005 06:55, Frans Pop wrote:
> This looks to be a serious bug in kernel-wedge as it seems a module
> from a previous kernel version is included when that module is not
> present for the kernel version for which udebs are being built.

Well, it isn't kernel-wedge. It's just that the udeb needs to be removed 
from the archive.
I've pinged jvw on #d-release for that.

We'll have to watch out for this for other arches too (notably AMD64).


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#342706: D-I - Minor buildd problems

2005-12-09 Thread Frans Pop
Package: libgtk+2.0-directfb0
Version: 2.0.9.2-12
Severity: serious

This from a thread on d-release.

Alastair, could you please look into this?
As it is keeping cdebconf from building on 2 arches, it's pretty important.

On Friday 09 December 2005 17:03, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 01:17:42PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> > There are several packages relevant for the installer that have what
> > looks like minor problems keeping them from being built on some
> > arches.

> > - cdebconf (0.91)
> >   Failed on alpha and ia64 with strange build dep error; a simple
> > retry may fix this.
>
> No, this is someone trying to be clever and hard-coding a dependency on
> libc6 into libgtk+2.0-directfb0.  The correct dependency on alpha and
> ia64 is libc6.1.  (I have no idea what the alternative on "| libc" is
> supposed to do; *nothing* provides "libc" on alpha, and even if it did,
> it'd be bloody worthless as a dependency.  We have sonames in our lib
> package names for a reason!)


pgpQZECYSGx71.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#342906: klibc: FTBFS on Sparc64 (local build)

2005-12-11 Thread Frans Pop
Package: klibc
Version: 1.1.1-4
Severity: serious
Justification: Fails to build from source

I was trying to recover from yaird failing to create an initrd for the
new kernel and, to install initramfs-tools, had to try to build klibc
locally as it's not available from the mirrors for Sparc.

This resulted in the following build failure:

[...]
strip gzip -o gzip.stripped
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/projects/klibc/klibc-1.1.1/gzip'
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/projects/klibc/klibc-1.1.1'
touch debian/stamp-makefile-build
if [ -e ash/sh.shared ]; then mv -f ash/sh.shared ash/sh; fi
make: *** No rule to make target `configure', needed by `build/libklibc-dev'.  
Stop.

Builddeps:
ii  bison2.1-0.2   A parser generator that is compatible with 
YACC
ii  cdbs 0.4.32common build system for Debian packages
ii  debhelper5.0.10helper programs for debian/rules
ii  flex 2.5.31-36 A fast lexical analyzer generator.
ii  gcc-3.3  3.3.6-10  The GNU C compiler
ii  linux-headers-2.6-12 2.6.12-10 Common architecture-specific header files 
for Linu


pgpV3OjGpRYvO.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#342906: klibc: FTBFS on Sparc64 (local build))

2005-12-11 Thread Frans Pop
The bug seems to be caused by the new make (3.80+3.81.b3-1).
The README.Debian lists several backwards incompatibility warnings for 
this version. Possibly the build failure is caused by one of those.

The build succeeded after downgrading to make 3.80-12.

I'm not sure where this problem needs to be fixed: klibc, cdbs or make. 
I'll leave it up to you to reassign.

Cheers,
FJP


pgpLtijdpDEq6.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#343902: debconf: "Can't call method 'description'" during tasksel

2005-12-18 Thread Frans Pop
Package: debconf
Version: 1.4.62
Severity: serious
Justification: Breaks new installations

When installing a new system (unstable), tasksel, while showing a progress 
bar, fails at the end of downloading packages with the following error:
   Can't call method 'description' on an undefined value.

Attached are two screenshots showing a log of the error using 
"DEBCONF_DEBUG=.". I am reliably informed that this is almost certainly a 
debconf-apt-progress bug.



apt-progress1.png
Description: PNG image


apt-progress2.png
Description: PNG image


pgpOcehrW4qjy.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#358532: installation-reports: sparc ultra 1 reboot fails

2006-03-23 Thread Frans Pop
severity 358532 important
reassign 358532 hw-detect
thanks

On Thursday 23 March 2006 03:35, Blars Blarson wrote:
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable

Please don't inflate severity: a reboot failure on one specific type of 
system does not make the whole installer unusable.

> esp does not support sysfs, this check for it needs to be disabled.

Why does this need to be disabled? Would that result in a good boot?
AFAICT the problem is that the esp module is not included in and loaded by 
the initrd, thus resulting in your root device not being available.

This actually is expected, as before the Beta 2 release we only had time 
to implement sbus support in d-i itself (which seems to have worked) and 
not the code needed to make sure detected devices are also included in 
the initrd. See the changelog for hw-detect 1.33.

If you're willing to test the needed modifications, it should not be hard 
to implement this.

Cheers,
FJP


pgpPbjCnX5q5E.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#358510: linux-image: SCSI/SATA boot problem

2006-03-23 Thread Frans Pop
severity 358510 important
thanks

On Thursday 23 March 2006 00:57, Glenn English wrote:
> When it comes time, during the boot process, to mount the root
> partition, sda has become a SATA drive. The boot kernel says sda3
> doesn't exist, and drops to a shell (or when the SCSI has only one
> partition, the boot kernel panics).

Looks like you've been hit by the first erratum mentioned on [1]. This is 
something we're aware of and that we hope to solve for the next release 
of d-i and at least before Etch is released.

> 
[rant]
> 

If you want to discuss such fundamental kernel design issues, please do it 
with the upstream kernel developers, not here. For what it's worth, 
you're wrong in that there's some kind of structural conflict. There is 
not, just a timing issue that could happen just as easily if you had two 
different scsi controllers or two different sata controlers in the same 
box.

[1] http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/errata


pgpOrHAQa1bCW.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#361872: debconf-copydb: Trashes debconf database in /target

2006-04-10 Thread Frans Pop
Package: cdebconf
Version: 0.97
Severity: serious

When debconf-copydb is run from pkgsel's postinst script, it deletes the 
existing /var/cache/debconf/templates.dat in /target; after it has run 
only copied templates are present.

This results in the problem that has been reported that tasksel is not 
translated. Commenting out the debconf-copydb statement solves this 
problem.

Verified with Etch Beta 2.


pgpbKLKcAvkeW.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#361024: note on "2.4 is deprecated"

2006-04-13 Thread Frans Pop
On Thursday 13 April 2006 22:59, Steve Langasek wrote:
> I think etch should support 2.4 in the sense of "upgrade support only";
> i.e., it should support 2.4 because we need to be able to install etch
> on systems running sarge 2.4 kernels, not because we'll provide support
> for 2.4 in etch.

What about (sub)arches that currently do not yet support installing 2.6?

If 2.4 is really going to be dropped for Etch except for upgrade purposes, 
I'd very much like to see a formal (release) policy statement saying so.

If 2.4 kernels are really abandoned, it will mean that we (d-i) could 
(should even) start cleaning out 2.4 related code and prod lagging 
architectures into more speed where it comes to switching to 2.6.

Delaying a formal decision much longer will probably mean we'll be stuck 
with 2.4 whether we like it or not.


pgp6RZnnCAGiT.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#362800: debian-installer: cd-rom installer requires online repository

2006-04-15 Thread Frans Pop
severity 362800 important
thanks

On Saturday 15 April 2006 19:22, Nizamov Shawkat wrote:
> Today I downloaded the fresh Etch iso image (CD-1, ~650Mb).
> When I tried to install, installer correctly recognized media as Etch
> 'testing' medium Then installer required to define the online
> repository to install from and subsequently, at step of base system
> install , refused to install saying something like "dont now how to
> install - no cd found and mirror is not reachable" ( This PC has NIC
> but no network )
> So I rendered this bug as critical as it does not allow to correctly
> install from appropriate medium

The fact that it tries to use a network mirror and a workaround for that 
is now documented in the errata for the Beta2 release [1].

Your problem is not that an online repository is required but that it 
fails somehow to read your CD.
We've had several reports of this, but no one has yet taken the trouble to 
help us find out where the real problem is.

Can you please do the following.
- do a new install
- proceed to partitioning
- while you are there:
  - switch to VT2 (using alt-F2)
  - use nano to edit the file /var/lib/dpkg/info/base-installer.postinst
and add a line 'set -x' below the first line
  - switch back to VT2 (using alt-F1)
- continue the installation until the error happens
- send us the /var/log/syslog file (gzipped!)

You can probably use the "Save debug logs" option from the main menu to 
save the syslog file.

Cheers,
FJP

[1] http://www.us.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/errata


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#363079: x11-common postinst fails about broken test

2006-04-17 Thread Frans Pop
severity 363079 normal
merge 363079 362846
thanks

On Monday 17 April 2006 15:28, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> -if [ ! -L -e -d "/usr/X11R6/bin" ]; then
> +if ! [ -L "/usr/X11R6/bin" ] && [ -d "/usr/X11R6/bin" ]; then

This bug was already filed as #362846 and was already fixed, though the 
fixed version has possibly not yet been uploaded.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#352753: udev: ide-generic no longer loaded on boot

2006-02-13 Thread Frans Pop
Package: udev
Version: 0.084-4
Severity: serious

After upgrade of udev from 0.084-3 to 0.084-4 and regenerating 
initramfs-tools initrd, ide-generic is no longer loaded on boot.
I get dropped into a shell. Doing:
  # modprobe ide-generic
  # exit
is enough to continue and complete the boot.

After downgrading udev and regenerating the initrd the system boots
normally again.

Setting RC severity as this is a regression from earlier udev version 
(ignoring the error messages during boot).

Kernel and initramfs-tools are current unstable.
My laptop uses the piix driver.

:00:1e.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801 Mobile PCI Bridge (rev 83)
:00:1f.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corporation 82801DBM (ICH4-M) LPC Interface 
Bridge (rev 03)
:00:1f.1 IDE interface: Intel Corporation 82801DBM (ICH4-M) IDE Controller 
(rev 03)


pgpWXjH3aBFOw.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#352753: udev: ide-generic no longer loaded on boot

2006-02-14 Thread Frans Pop
tags + patch
thanks

Hi Marco,

We've done a debugging session today involving Otavio Salvadore (who also 
saw the issue), maks and myself.

There are two possible solutions, both involving modifications in
/usr/share/initramfs-tools/hooks/udev.

1) revert inclusion of *_id scripts
   Commenting out the three lines at the end of the current file lets the
   system boot again.
2) add 'copy_exec /lib/udev/ide.agent /lib/udev' at the end of the file
   Apparently some _id script calls ide.agent and this makes sure
   ide-generic is loaded at the correct time.

An lsmod after both boots shows ide-generic loaded after the piix driver, 
AFAIK this is correct.

The second solution has our preference.
Basically ide.agent does the same as what's currently in
/usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts/init-premount/ide (which could probably 
be cleaned now).

The comment at the top of the ide.agent seems to imply that this whole 
ide-generic issue will be fixed in 2.6.16 kernels, which would be great.


With my d-i release manager hat on, I would suggest uploading -5 with this 
fix at MEDIUM urgency. I would be very unhappy with -4 in testing in the 
middle of preparing for D-I Beta2. I will make sure that udev gets into 
testing before the final build for Beta2.


One other thing.
With the patch applied, most errors that are shown with -3 are gone (there 
were screens full of them!), but I still get 2 times the following error 
on the console during a boot:
   (...) exec of program /etc/initd.d/hdparm failed

IMO it would be good to suppress such messages as, in my experience, they 
will only lead to unnecessary installation and bug reports.
maks suggested to re-add the "silence_exec_error" patch for Beta2 and 
maybe come back to this issue after that?

Thanks,
Frans Pop


pgpqq2QrT7EjA.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#352753: udev: ide-generic no longer loaded on boot

2006-02-15 Thread Frans Pop
On Wednesday 15 February 2006 12:50, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> Sorry, the right command was "udevtest /block/hda".

$ sudo udevtest /block/hda
main: looking at device '/block/hda' from subsystem 'block'
run_program: 'ata_id --export /dev/.tmp-3-0'
run_program: '/lib/udev/ata_id' (stdout) 'ID_TYPE=disk'
run_program: '/lib/udev/ata_id' (stdout) 'ID_MODEL=IC25N060ATMR04-0'
run_program: '/lib/udev/ata_id' (stdout) 'ID_SERIAL=MRG357K3JG1N2H'
run_program: '/lib/udev/ata_id' (stdout) 'ID_REVISION=MO3OAD4A'
run_program: '/lib/udev/ata_id' (stdout) 'ID_BUS=ata'
run_program: '/lib/udev/ata_id' returned with status 0
run_program: 'edd_id --export /dev/.tmp-3-0'
run_program: '/lib/udev/edd_id' (stderr) 'no kernel EDD support'
run_program: '/lib/udev/edd_id' returned with status 2
run_program: 'path_id /block/hda'
run_program: '/lib/udev/path_id' (stdout) 'ID_PATH=pci-:00:1f.1-ide-0:0'
run_program: '/lib/udev/path_id' returned with status 0
udev_rules_get_name: add symlink 
'disk/by-id/ata-IC25N060ATMR04-0_MRG357K3JG1N2H'
udev_rules_get_name: add symlink 'disk/by-path/pci-:00:1f.1-ide-0:0'
run_program: 'vol_id --export /dev/.tmp-3-0'
run_program: '/lib/udev/vol_id' returned with status 4
udev_rules_get_name: no node name set, will use kernel name 'hda'
main: run: 'socket:/org/kernel/udev/monitor'
main: run: '/etc/init.d/hdparm hotplug'
main: run: 'udev_run_hotplugd block'
main: run: 'udev_run_devd block'


pgp899AQB7TAr.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#352753: udev: ide-generic no longer loaded on boot

2006-02-15 Thread Frans Pop
Marco,

Attached is the info you requested, at least I hope it is.
You asked for 'udevtest -a -p /sys/block/hdetc', but udevtest only gave me 
systax errors or 'could not open file' errors. udevinfo did give a result 
with those parameters, so I decided you probably mistyped.
If you actually want udevtest, what would be the correct command?

On Wednesday 15 February 2006 01:52, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> BTW, I would really really like to see the content of an uevent which
> causes ide-generic to be loaded.

I'm happy to help research the why of ide-generic further and Sven Luther 
also suggested we do so on d-kernel list. I'd also be very happy if we 
could agree to delay this until after D-I Beta2.

The plain fact is that a number of ide drivers seem to need ide-generic 
loaded after the "real" driver is loaded. Loading it early blocks the use 
of DMA for some drivers. There have been several threads about this on 
d-kernel and both initramfs-tools and yaird have added workarounds for 
it.

> When is the deadline for entering testing for Beta2?

udev would have to migrate to testing around February 20...

> Maybe, but I'd rather to fix this once for good instead of hiding all
> errors again.

Ack.

Cheers,
Frans


udevinfo starts with the device the node belongs to and then walks up the
device chain, to print for every device found, all possibly useful attributes
in the udev key format.
Only attributes within one device section may be used together in one rule,
to match the device for which the node will be created.

  looking at device '/block/hda':
KERNEL=="hda"
SUBSYSTEM=="block"
SYSFS{stat}=="2217 18184810336529  656 1590
179684519202248981721"
SYSFS{size}=="117210240"
SYSFS{removable}=="0"
SYSFS{range}=="64"
SYSFS{dev}=="3:0"

  looking at device '/devices/pci:00/:00:1f.1/ide0/0.0':
ID=="0.0"
BUS=="ide"
DRIVER=="ide-disk"

  looking at device '/devices/pci:00/:00:1f.1/ide0':
ID=="ide0"
BUS==""
DRIVER==""

  looking at device '/devices/pci:00/:00:1f.1':
ID==":00:1f.1"
BUS=="pci"
DRIVER=="PIIX_IDE"
SYSFS{modalias}=="pci:v8086d24CAsv1179sd0001bc01sc01i8a"
SYSFS{local_cpus}=="1"
SYSFS{irq}=="169"
SYSFS{class}=="0x01018a"
SYSFS{subsystem_device}=="0x0001"
SYSFS{subsystem_vendor}=="0x1179"
SYSFS{device}=="0x24ca"
SYSFS{vendor}=="0x8086"

  looking at device '/devices/pci:00':
ID=="pci:00"
BUS==""
DRIVER==""



pgpSDjRQwJV40.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#353065: linux-image-2.6.15-1-k7: update of 2.6.15-1-k7 results in unstartable system

2006-02-15 Thread Frans Pop
On Wednesday 15 February 2006 23:48, Chris Searle wrote:
> I have no idea how to go about debugging this and of course - since it
> can't find the disks - no logs to look in :(

Please try the following at the shell prompt:
# modprobe ide-generic
# echo /dev/hda*

Are your partitions listed now? If so:
# exit

And your system should continue to boot normally.

If this works, this is a known issue that has already been fixed in a new 
version of udev.
Could you please tell us which driver your hard disk controller needs?


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#354339: Always tries to retrieve a preseed file even for not preseeded installs

2006-02-27 Thread Frans Pop
tags 354339 + unreproducible
thanks

On Saturday 25 February 2006 14:14, Christian Perrier wrote:
> It seems that preseed always tries to retrieve a preseed file...even
> for not preseeded installs.
>
> I found this while running a standard install with the sid_d-i netinst
> of 20060224.

I cannot reproduce this with either sid_d-i 20060224 or 20060225, so there 
must be something in your local situation that causes this.

Please run the installation at medium priority and tell at which menu step 
the preseeding happens.
When you've done that, try to find the script that is run and add a
'set -x' to get a log of what it actually does.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#354339: Always tries to retrieve a preseed file even for not preseeded installs

2006-02-28 Thread Frans Pop
tags 354339 - patch
tags 354339 - pending
thanks

I have looked at the coding and I'm not happy with it for the release. 
Although I agree that the patch by Geert will solve the problem seen by 
Christian, I think it only helps to hide some more basic problems with 
the whole implementation of dhcp preseeding.

For one thing, my dhcp server setup [1] already uses 'filename' for PXE 
netbooting. So it seems that the chosen solution is incompatible with 
netbooting which I doubt was the intention. Maybe it would be better to 
use something like 'preseed-url' instead [2].

Having the dual use of 'filename' also makes the isinstallable check less 
than ideal as it will currently also make network-preseed installable for 
my PXE netboot setup while I have not set that up for dhcp preseeding.

I think the current test
   if [ -n "$FN" -a -z "${FN##*://*}" ]; then
is intended to check that $FN actually contains an URL.
However, this is not very obvious from the code. It is probably better to 
replace this test with something like
   if echo "$FN" | grep -q "\(http\|ftp\)://" ; then

IMO all this needs some thought and changes in the implementation. I have 
therefore uploaded a version of preseed without support for dhcp pre-
seeding but with the fixes needed for existing preseeding functionality.


[1]
My dhcp server setup contains:
  group {
 filename "/i386/pxelinux.0";
 next-server 10.19.66.2;

 host  {
hardware ethernet ;
fixed-address ;
option host-name "";
 }
  }

This results in a lease file which contains (even if I do not actually PXE 
boot):
lease {
  interface "eth0";
  fixed-address ;
  filename "/i386/pxelinux.0";
  option [...]
  [...]
}

[2] Note that this would also need to be changed in the manual.


pgpdMnfdBG2OL.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#354339: Always tries to retrieve a preseed file even for not preseeded installs

2006-03-01 Thread Frans Pop
On Wednesday 01 March 2006 07:33, Joey Hess wrote:
> Frans Pop wrote:
> > For one thing, my dhcp server setup [1] already uses 'filename' for
> > PXE netbooting. So it seems that the chosen solution is incompatible
> > with netbooting which I doubt was the intention.
>
> No, see the documentation (in the installation manual). It's possible
> to conditionalise the filename to send the url only to the d-i dhcp
> client while sending a regular file for the pxe boot stage.

Right, I missed that.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#355098: debian-installer - FTBFS: Tries to use apt with key checks

2006-03-03 Thread Frans Pop
or security checks.
+#	- debian-archive-keyring
+#		To provide the archive key for security checks.
 #	- dpkg (>= 1.13.9)
 #		We tweak dpkg logging options only understood by this
 #		version.
Index: debian/changelog
===
--- debian/changelog	(revision 35185)
+++ debian/changelog	(working copy)
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+debian-installer (20060303) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Add build dependency on debian-archive-keyring and make sure that is used
+for downloading udebs. Closes: #355098.
+
+ -- Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Fri,  3 Mar 2006 19:51:22 +0100
+
 debian-installer (20060302) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Remove floppy-modules udeb again from powerpc root floppy as it seems this


pgppMHT09yRy3.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#355098: debian-installer - FTBFS: Tries to use apt with key checks

2006-03-03 Thread Frans Pop
On Friday 03 March 2006 20:31, Frans Pop wrote:
> I think the attached patch may allow the buildd to perform the key
> check, but I'm not completely sure.

Actually, it looks like the change in get-packages may not be needed and 
we can suffice with an extra build-dep on debian-archive-keys. This 
package will run apt-key update in its postinst and thus update
/etc/apt/trusted.gpg.

As Joey mentioned on IRC, hard linking to the keyring in /usr/ would mean 
that locally added keys in the default keyring will no longer be used.


pgpqzYCXLog73.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#353111: linux-image-2.6.15-1-sparc64-smp: 2.6.15 kernel can't find root disk /dev/sda1, won't boot

2006-03-08 Thread Frans Pop
On Wednesday 08 March 2006 06:42, Blars Blarson wrote:
> Since the system isn't bootable it's hard to check the contents of
> that file.

You could try the rescue mode of the installer to get a chroot into your 
root directory to generate a new initrd.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#361872: debconf-copydb: Trashes debconf database in /target

2006-06-20 Thread Frans Pop
On Monday 19 June 2006 20:57, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> After some discussion on IRC, here's the updated patch.

Joey applied this patch yesterday and today I've built cdebconf for the 
new version and after that a mini.iso including that.
When pkgsel is run, the debconf database is still being trashed...

/me is confused


pgp3ex3idptPJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#361872: debconf-copydb: Trashes debconf database in /target

2006-06-20 Thread Frans Pop
(Keeping Steinar in To: in the hope he'll want to try this one as well ;-)

On Tuesday 20 June 2006 16:40, you wrote:
> One change is needed yet; the current code in debconf-copydb simply
> turns off i18n support (since the old code couldn't handle that
> properly, it seems, or perhaps it's even older). Just nuke the setenv()
> line from debconf-copydb.c and we should be okay.

Works much better with that removed. You were right though that the 
database is completely reorganized...
After some sed and sort magic, I could verify the contents.

The only remaining issue is that after the debconf-copydb all "Owners:" 
fields from the original templates.dat in target are lost.

Only three templates were added:
Name: debian-installer/country
Name: debian-installer/keymap
Name: debian-installer/language

The config.dat looks good too, with the three templates added and a value 
for passwd/username merged.


pgp3N7SUj6zaI.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#374705: adduser: creates incorrect mail spool files during new installation

2006-06-20 Thread Frans Pop
Package: adduser
Version: 3.87
Severity: serious
Tags: d-i

After a new installation using Debian Installer, there are wrong mail 
files for several (system) users that are created during the 
installation:

# cd /target/var/spool/mail
# ls -l
-- 1 root mail 0 2006-06-20 13:41 Debian-exim
-- 1 root mail 0 2006-06-20 13:55 fjp
-- 1 root mail 0 2006-06-20 13:41 identd
-- 1 root mail 0 2006-06-20 13:41 statd

(fjp is the normal user created during this install)

Note that both the permissions and the ownership are broken. This breaks 
mail delivery for the installed system.
AFAIK there is actually no need to create mail spool files for new users?

I was able to create a similar file from the d-i debug shell:
# chroot /target adduser xxx
[...]
# ls -l xxx
-- 1 root mail 0 2006-06-20 14:15 xxx


pgprZBBRocr7g.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#374705: #374705: adduser: creates incorrect mail spool files during new installation

2006-06-20 Thread Frans Pop
Confirmed that the bug was introduced with passwd 4.0.15-10.
After downgrading to 4.0.15-9 there is no longer a mail spool file created 
for a new user.


pgpO0EixybjeR.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#374705: [Pkg-shadow-devel] Bug#374705: tentative patch

2006-06-21 Thread Frans Pop
On Wednesday 21 June 2006 22:26, you wrote:
> However, I think the issue is not present in the 4.0.16 versions
> (according to my tests and according to the code).
>
> Can somebody else confirm?

Confirmed. If I do a new install of unstable, the mail spool dir is clean.


pgp3pZbjlwzC1.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#375927: RAID: groot is always set to (hd0,0)

2006-06-29 Thread Frans Pop
reassign 375927 installation-reports
severity 375927 normal
thanks

On Thursday 29 June 2006 01:53, Michael Biebl wrote:
> md0 (sda1,sdb1) => swap
> md1 (sda2,sdb2) => /

> grub is installed correctly, but groot in /boot/grub/menu.lst is set to
> (hd0,0), so update-grub generates a /boot/grub/menu.lst, where root is
> not correctly set leading to an unbootable system.

groot is not the same as root. (hd0,0) seems perfectly OK to me for groot.

Please show us the lines as generated by the installer in grub's menu.lst 
for the default entry for the installed system and the lines as you think 
they should be (or better: with which the system does boot).

> (this is the reason, why I set the severity to grave).

This is a fairly unusual setup and the error should be easy to correct, 
especially given that grub menu lines can be corrected during the boot.
Therefore a RC severity is not correct.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#376260: glib2.0: FTBFS on IA64

2006-07-01 Thread Frans Pop
Package: glib2.0
Version: 2.10.3-2
Severity: serious

Last upload of glib2.0 has failed to build on IA64.

This was already discussed on IRC, but I've decided to file a BR anyway as 
this will block the release of the Beta3 release of Debian Installer.

< fjp> Np237: Any ideas about the glib2.0 build failure on IA64?
< Np237> fjp, none, sorry
< Np237> looks like references to ia64 specific assembly code
< vorlon> Np237: from time to time, there have been arch-specific, 
glibc-provided symbols that can't be made local in a version script 
without breaking the linkage.  This looks like an instance of that.
< vorlon> hmm, s/glibc-provided/compiler-provided/
< Np237> vorlon, so this is a problem with glib's version script?
< vorlon> looks like it to me
< Np237> and this one is autogenerated with libtool...
< vorlon> yuck.


pgpRhZj07tbdG.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#376771: kernel-image-2.4-sparc32 in unstable is not installable

2006-07-04 Thread Frans Pop
On Tuesday 04 July 2006 23:20, Joey Hess wrote:
> An updated kernel-image-2.4-sparc32 was uploaded to stable and reached
> unstable since that version was newer than anyhing in unstable. The new
> version was for the -3 abi version of the kernel, which for sparc32,
> has for some reason not reached unstable/testing even though it is
> available in proposed-updates.

As I understand it this is an FTP master problem: since the implementation 
of NEW handling for p-u (around the time of the Sarge r2 release) there 
have been no syncs of any security updates from p-u to unstable/testing 
for any package.

> Either the version in proposed-updates should be added to unstable too,
> or a new version uploaded. Until this happens, sparc32 installs will
> not be possible (unless we finally get a 2.6 kernel that can support
> sparc32).

There is a 2.6 kernel that supports sparc32 (2.6.16) and e.g. daily 2.6 
netboot images are already available for sparc32. There are also d-i 
images for CDs based on 2.6, but these are not yet supported in debian-cd 
as adding them would break weekly CD builds.


pgpuvFd4LMdPI.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#376260: Bug:#376260: glib2.0: FTBFS on IA64

2006-07-11 Thread Frans Pop
Hi,

After pinging Lamont on IRC, I decided to try the fix myself...

glib2.0 with debian/patches/999_ia64_atomic_ops_broken.patch removed built 
fine on merulo (sid chroot).

ii  gcc   4.1.1-3   The GNU C compiler

Is this a case of "if it builds it's OK"?

If you like, I could take care of the NMU.

Cheers,
FJP


pgpPYLVQ3IXN9.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#377853: CONFIG_USB_STORAGE_DEBUG enabled => linux-image-2.6.16-2-nslu2 is unusable

2006-07-13 Thread Frans Pop
On Thursday 13 July 2006 00:34, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Yeah, I just noticed that myself. :/  It does suck but I'm not sure
> this is a RC bug.  The kernel does work, sort of, after all... we're
> trying to get beta3 out and I think the -boot team will kill me if
> there has to be another kernel rebuild so I suggest we leave it as it
> is for now (I've disabled it in SVN already for future releases).

Also, nslu2 is not really a mainstream arch that justifies delaying 
everything. This seems like a too small issue to have to rebuild for all 
arches to me.

> Ccing -boot to get comments.  Would there be time for another kernel
> upload?  If not, I'll downgrade this bug.

An upload would just be possible, especially if it includes no other 
changes affecting other arches (so we can skip rebuilding the udebs).
The main delay would be the build for arm which takes over a day...
I'll leave the final decision to the kernel team, but if you upload please 
do so ASAP.

Isn't there a way to work around this at run time (i.e. setting a value to 
0 in /proc somewhere that disables the debugging)?

Cheers,
FJP


pgpbNsk1gWptu.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#372734: (kein Betreff)

2006-07-16 Thread Frans Pop
On Sunday 16 July 2006 20:59, Florian Effenberger wrote:
> Could anybody please move that to the repository? Bug still is there...

It will be part of the next point release for stable. Fixed package is 
currently available from proposed-updates.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#378521: installation-report: installed system is not working

2006-07-17 Thread Frans Pop
severity 378521 normal
thanks

On Monday 17 July 2006 06:39, Manfred Richter wrote:
> Comments/Problems:
> During installation a driver for the ethernet, called sky2, is used.
> After installation this driver is not longer present.

Davide Viti has already given you the reason for this issue. It should be 
resolved sometime this week as we expect the 2.6.16 kernels to finally 
migrate to testing.

Cheers,
FJP


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#372734: (kein Betreff)

2006-07-17 Thread Frans Pop
On Monday 17 July 2006 10:53, you wrote:
> > It will be part of the next point release for stable. Fixed package
> > is currently available from proposed-updates.
>
> It isn't. Having
>
> deb ftp://ftp.de.debian.org/debian sarge main contrib non-free
> deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian sarge-proposed-updates main contrib
> non-free
> deb http://security.debian.org sarge/updates main contrib non-free
>
> in my sources.list, I still get the error after apt-get update &&
> apt-get upgrade

What version do you have installed or is it trying to install?


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#373567: finish-install fails also with busybox v. 1.1.3-2

2006-07-19 Thread Frans Pop
On Wednesday 19 July 2006 22:22, Patrick Winnertz wrote:
> I installed an cdd (debian-edu) and the installer failed in the
> finish-install.postinst - script.
> Errormessage as above (shortly: unsupported option -k)
> The Busybox Version shipped with the cd is Busybox 1.1.3-2 and

I seriously doubt you are using the busybox-udeb with that version when 
building the installer's initrd. Check your /var/lib/dpkg/status file.
The -k option _is_ supported in busybox-udeb 1.1.3-2.


pgp7d1Y6hT8kt.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#335950: install cannot figure out how to install no cdrom found

2005-10-27 Thread Frans Pop
severity 335950 normal
reassign 335950 installation-reports
thanks

On Thursday 27 October 2005 00:32, Kenneth Gessner wrote:
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks the whole system

Again the severity is inflated. How can it break the system if there is no 
system installed?

> "cannot install base system.
> the installer cannot figure out how to install the base system. no
> installable cdrom was found and no valid mirror was configured."

As this works fine for most users, it is more likely a kernel problem 
related to your hardware.
You seem to have SATA. There are known driver conflicts for some 
controllers between the CD driver and the SATA driver.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#337248: libgtk+2.0-directfb-dev: Missing dependency on pkg-config

2005-11-03 Thread Frans Pop
Package: libgtk+2.0-directfb-dev
Version: 2.0.9.2-10
Followup-For: Bug #337248

As this package supplies .pc files, it should depend on pkg-config
(libgtk2.0-dev does the same).
No real hurry to add this as this is currently taken care of for
cdebconf-gtk by its dependency on libgtk2.0-dev.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-16.0508-2
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages libgtk+2.0-directfb-dev depends on:
ii  libdirectfb-dev   0.9.22-8   frame buffer graphics library, dev
ii  libgtk+2.0-directfb0  2.0.9.2-10 gtk+2.0 implementation for the fra

libgtk+2.0-directfb-dev recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#337382: installation-guide: FTBFS: sed: unknown option to 's'

2005-11-04 Thread Frans Pop
tag 337382 pending
thanks

On Friday 04 November 2005 09:48, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> Tracing this by adding a set -x to the command line, it appears this
> is being caused by s390 expanding to an ARCH_FULL of "S/390".

Correct. This is already fixed in the rules file by changing the 
separators for sed from "/" to ":".

I would not have expected anybody to try and build the manual themselves 
though :-)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#337382: installation-guide: FTBFS: sed: unknown option to 's'

2005-11-04 Thread Frans Pop
severity 337382 important
thanks

Downgrading this issue. As the installation-guide is arch all, it does not 
need to be build on the buildd's and is therefore less critical. It 
should at least not block the current version from moving to testing.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#339711: dhcp-client: Severely broken on sparc

2005-11-18 Thread Frans Pop
I'm seeing the same problem on my Sparc Ultra10. Switching to dhcp3-client 
solved the issue.

Removal of the package might not be such a good idea as Debian-Installer 
uses the dhcp-client-udeb. I've not yet checked if the udeb has the same 
problems on sparc.


pgpj9M3nFzGdl.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#339711: dhcp-client: Severely broken on sparc

2005-11-19 Thread Frans Pop
On Saturday 19 November 2005 05:05, Steve Langasek wrote:
> What's holding up the switch to dhcp3-client-udeb?  Andrew Pollock did
> a lot of work earlier this year to get it ready for d-i use.  Is there
> still something missing, or is it just a question of trying it out?

The only issue AFAIK is size.

For i386   Package  Installed
dhcp-client-udeb  40132
dhcp3-client-udeb145396

For sparc  Package  Installed
dhcp-client-udeb  43176
dhcp3-client-udeb150608

For ia64   Package  Installed
dhcp-client-udeb  70352
dhcp3-client-udeb268   1356

As you can see a factor 3-4 larger. This is especially bad for floppy 
based installation.


pgpP9Be2caC11.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#333835: ctrlproxy: Eats up memory making the system unusable

2005-11-19 Thread Frans Pop
On Saturday 19 November 2005 10:41, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Do we actually have reason to believe that this is a memory leak, i.e.,
> leaving the daemon running will continue to eat more memory?  If the
> program simply needs 70-some MB to run, that's unfortunate, but not RC;
> if, OTOH, its memory usage continues to grow beyond the point shown in
> the bug report, I agree that sounds release-critical.

Yes, it slowly continues to eat more and more memory over time. The 
situation shown in the bug report came to be after running for several 
months. It runs fine using less memory when restarted.


pgpdx3q2RZNgv.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#339711: dhcp-client: Severely broken on sparc

2005-11-19 Thread Frans Pop
On Saturday 19 November 2005 15:15, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Granted, though it seems that at least two of the architectures you
> quoted don't support floppy installs in etch? :)

Sparc does but they are not part of official release as building them 
requires root.


pgpRx89JdeMb9.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#342925: missing ide-generic

2005-12-23 Thread Frans Pop
On Friday 23 December 2005 14:34, maximilian attems wrote:
> please try the attached patch,
> should load ide-generic even if udev didn't yet bring it up:

Although my initial report was for Sparc (which I will test tomorrow, I've 
also tested it on my laptop.
ide-generic is loaded, but ide-disk is not, so not quite there yet for me.

The laptop (Toshiba Satellite A40) needs piix (which is loaded):
:00:1f.1 IDE interface: Intel Corp. 82801DBM (ICH4) Ultra ATA Storage 
Controller (rev 03)

Cheers,
FJP


pgpmQMc5vM18X.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#342925: missing ide-generic

2005-12-24 Thread Frans Pop
On Saturday 24 December 2005 04:32, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Friday 23 December 2005 14:34, maximilian attems wrote:
> > please try the attached patch,
> > should load ide-generic even if udev didn't yet bring it up:
>
> Although my initial report was for Sparc (which I will test tomorrow)

The patch does not solve anything for the Sparc: ide-disk still does not 
get loaded.


pgpEh12Fjdlw5.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#342925: fails to load ide-disk, doesn't find hdd

2005-12-28 Thread Frans Pop
On Thursday 29 December 2005 02:48, maximilian attems wrote:
> could you try the attached hook file,
> please place it under 
> /usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts/init-premount/

The ide hook file in #344754 works for me on both my Sparc and laptop.

Cheers,
FJP


pgpuUo1BmT4gV.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#322723: 'ip route' kernel problem w/ gcc-4.0

2005-09-07 Thread Frans Pop
I've reassigned this bug from the kernel to gcc-4.0 as we feel that the 
solution chosen in the kernel packaging is not really a fix, but a 
workaround.
As tests have shown that the problem does not exist when the same kernel 
is compiled with gcc-3.3, the real bug is likely in gcc-4.0.

I've "found" the bug for 4.0.1-3 after looking at the dates for relevant 
uploads, but as uploads were quite frequent, I could be off by a version 
either way.

Please see the bug history for details.

Cheers,
FJP


pgpIerUbQ3XM7.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#322723: 'ip route' kernel problem w/ gcc-4.0

2005-09-07 Thread Frans Pop
On Wednesday 07 September 2005 23:21, you wrote:
> It would be extremely helpful if you could find a way to reproduce
> this that does not require root... any ideas?

Well, I think the problem can also be reproduced outside a 
debian-installer environment (getting linux-image-2.6.12-1-386 (2.6.12-2) 
out of the archives and running 'ip route add' should reproduce it), but 
I've seen no other commands than 'ip route add' fail and that does 
require root...

Unfortunately I have hardly any C background and feel I've already passed 
the limits of what I can do (a lot of the info was gathered with help of 
joeyh and waldi).
Maybe the best thing would be to work together with the kernel team on 
this issue.

Hmm. waldi just pointed me at #325670 on IRC. Looks like it may be 
related.


pgpnaGUPOMDrY.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#328992: partconf: [s/390] No longer recognizes dasd partitions

2005-09-18 Thread Frans Pop
Package: partconf
Version: 1.10
Severity: grave
Tags: d-i

During installation for s/390, partconf no longer recognizes partitions on 
a dasd. This is probably due to recompilation against libparted 1.6.24.


pgpmSfYq3oxbn.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#329994: base-installer: lilo-installer fails because vmlinuz symlink is not in /

2005-09-24 Thread Frans Pop
Package: base-installer
Version: 1.24
Severity: serious

In commit r29833 the value of link_in_boot was changed from false to true 
for i386 and amd64. This change make lilo-installer fail as lilo.conf is 
configured to expect symlinks for the kernel and initrd in / (if boot is 
not a separate partition).

The changelog entry for this change (release 1.24) is:
  * Turn link_in_boot on for both i386 and amd64. They should be the same,
and Kamion points out turning it off for amd64 is a regression.


pgpEN5cdOh6ci.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#329994: base-installer: lilo-installer fails because vmlinuz symlink is not in /

2005-09-25 Thread Frans Pop
On Sunday 25 September 2005 09:40, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> Why the serious severity?  lilo is not the default boot loader, so
> this only affect expert installs.

Because LILO is the default installer in some cases (/ on XFS IIRC) and is 
also ofter prefered by users for RAID installs.
Also, it is a clear regression from Sarge.

> > In commit r29833 the value of link_in_boot was changed from false to
> > true for i386 and amd64. This change make lilo-installer fail as
> > lilo.conf is configured to expect symlinks for the kernel and initrd
> > in / (if boot is not a separate partition).
>
> I suggest reassigning this to the lilo package, asking it to generate
> a lilo.conf file pointing into /boot/ instead of expecting symlinks in
> /.

That should be lilo-installer, not lilo, as it is lilo-installer that 
creates the lilo.conf.

However, I would first like to hear what the problem was for AMD64 that 
prompted the change in the first place and make sure that RAID and LVM 
installs will not be broken by changing things that way.


pgpWWv5uObsWw.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#329994: base-installer: lilo-installer fails because vmlinuz symlink is not in /

2005-09-26 Thread Frans Pop
On Monday 26 September 2005 17:11, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> My raid install of sarge used grub.  Why ever would you want it to use
> lilo?

No idea. Just noticed in installation reports that quite a few users 
prefer lilo over grub.

> Or does grub behave that differently on amd64 that it can't support md
> raid1 like it does on i386?

Would not expect that to be the case.


pgp8V04HBMzrR.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#319148: discover1: ftbfs [sparc] invalid application of 'sizeof' to incomplete type 'struct sbus_info'

2005-07-20 Thread Frans Pop
Hi Jurij,

Could you take a look at this bug (as you submitted the original patch and 
this could be kernel headers related...).

Cheers,
FJP

On Wednesday 20 July 2005 09:26, Blars Blarson wrote:
> discover1 failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc
> pbuilder:

[11:30:24]  any sparc users around?  Please have a look on #319148, 
ftbfs for discover1.
[11:30:24]  pere: where is "struct sbus_info" defined?
[11:30:24]  don't say it is somewhere in the kernel headers
[11:30:24]  waldi: I have no idea.  the sbus support was provided as 
a patch in bts, from some sparc user.
[12:45:18]  pere: I assume you refer to #299074. That is not 'some 
sparc user', but trave11er who is on the kernel team and can often be 
found on this channel.
[12:49:17]  pere: The funny thing is that the change was introduced 
in 1.7.9 and that did build correctly on sparc. I wonder if this could be 
a change in the kernel headers?
[12:54:14]  entirely possible; l-k-h has had several recent 
uploads.
[12:55:20]  doesn't mean it's not a discover bug, though.


pgpN2GqbfIm0M.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#319148: Blocking a major ISP in Netherlands

2005-07-20 Thread Frans Pop
Hi Blars,

I've had trouble mailing you in the past, but this time it prevents me 
from sending you your GPG key with my signature.
Because I'm not sure how else to contact you, I'm abusing the BTS.

I got the mail returned with:
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.

A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:

  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SMTP error from remote mailer after MAIL FROM:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
host blars.org [64.81.35.59]: 553 5.3.0 mail from spamming sites 
refused, see http://www.blars.org/errors/block.html

The mail was sent through smtp.tiscali.nl (195.241.79.132), although from 
the headers it appears as if it was handled by smtp-out1.tiscali.nl 
(195.241.79.176).
Tiscali is one of the major ISPs in the Netherlands, so currently you are 
blocking on an extremely course basis.

Cheers,
Frans Pop


Here are the headers for the original message:
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from [195.240.184.66] (helo=localhost)
by smtp-out1.tiscali.nl with esmtp (Tiscali http://www.tiscali.nl)
id 1Dua9c-0002lD-DD
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 18 Jul 2005 20:15:48 +0200
Received: from fjp by localhost with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1Dua9d-0004TR-6t
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 18 Jul 2005 20:15:49 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Your signed PGP key 0x8351C3C268AC5746
User-Agent: caff 0.0.0.58 - (c) 2004, 2005 Peter Palfrader
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.417 (Entity 5.417)
Sender: "Frans Pop,,," <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: multipart/encrypted; protocol="application/pgp-encrypted"; 
boundary="--=_1121710549-17145-1"
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary
From: "Frans Pop" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 20:15:49 +0200
X-SA-Do-Not-Run: Yes


pgpzhu78m6skJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#320053: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686: Installing it with sarge leads to failing at booting next time

2005-07-26 Thread Frans Pop
On Tuesday 26 July 2005 19:27, Stefan Esterer wrote:
> After i choose the Sarge install in grub the kernel stops after some
> time with :
> modprobe: FATAL: Error inserting pciehp
> (/lib/modules/2.6.8-2-686/kernel/drivers/pci/hotplug/shpchp.ko):
> Operation not permitted
> shpchp: can't be loaded
> [...]
> hw_random: can't be loaded
> [...]

Everything up to here is "normal". These modules are not supported by your 
hardware but do no harm. Just blacklist them for both discover and 
hotplug and you will be fine.

> Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual adress
> 0024
> [...]
> i810_audio: can't be loaded
> [...]

This one looks very much like a problem I've seen in several installation 
reports. [1] gives the best summary and status of the problem and has a 
workaround. Could you check that's the same issue?

Basic problem: we really need someone who has the hardware and is willing 
to test solutions. Could you do that?
The first step would be: check if the problem still occur with the 2.6.12 
kernel. The second step would be: get in touch with the ALSA people and 
try to get the problem solved (maybe testing with latest drivers from CVS 
first).

[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=298623

Cheers,
FJP

(P.S. Please give a little bit more of the console output next time; it 
was just chance that I recognized the issue from the two relevant lines.)


pgpVvzvo96BIS.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#320784: installation-reports: missing script & packages from CD

2005-08-01 Thread Frans Pop
severity 320784 normal
thanks

Daily images can be broken sometimes (like the images dated 31-07-2005)...

On Monday 01 August 2005 14:29, Torok Edwin wrote:
> Debian-installer-version:
> http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/etch_d-i/i386/20050709/de
>bian-testing-i386-netinst.iso uname -a:Linux lightspeed.dnsalias.net

Hmm. Juli 9, that is quite old...

> I. The network couldn't be configured because I use PPPoE, i managed to
> configure it after the reboot (this is a known issue, I've read on the
> webpage).

Well, there is a module that should work. Only problem is that no one has 
really tested it for PPPoE so far and given us useful feedback. If you're 
interested, try installing with 'install debconf/priority=medium' and 
select the ppp-modules component after the installation CD is mounted.

Note: this does not really make sense with a netinst as you don't need the 
network before reboot (unless you want to use the bugreporter component). 
You could try the business card image or netbooting instead...

> II. The base system didn't install, because:
>   1. Deboostrap error: no such script /usr/lib/debootstrap/scripts/etch
>   solution: I copied the /usr/lib/debootstrap/scripts/sid to etch

Should be fixed now.

>   2. Couldn't download:
> at, exim4, ipchains, mailx, exim4-config, exim4-base,
> exim4-daemon-light note: the packages aren't on the netinst CD!
>   solution: I removed the packages from the install script

Hmm. That's weird. Does the current netinst still have the same problem 
for you?

>   3. Couldn't meet dependencies of initrd-tools:
>   cramfsprogs, dash missing from the install script
>   solution: I added those packages to the install script
>   4. Couldn't meet dependencies of whiptail and other packages that
> depend on libslang2
>   solution: I added libslang2 to the install script

Should all be solved in current images.

> III. Apt-setup should ask if I want to add more sources when adding an
> http source, but instead it just went to the next step (choosing
> packages to install)
>  solution: I added the local mirrors, and cdroms first,(in this case
> apt-setup asked me if I want more sources added)  and then the
> http source

That is a design choice in order to limit the number of questions asked 
(based on number of packages available).

Thanks for submitting the report.

Cheers,
FJP


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#322723: dhcp-client-udeb: 'id route add' fails w/ "Network is unreachable"

2005-08-12 Thread Frans Pop
Package: dhcp-client-udeb
Version: 2.0pl5-19.1
Severity: serious
Tags: d-i

Installations for 1386 using current daily builds (using 2.6.12) are 
failing with a screen saying "no default route could be set".
The cause for this is that in /etc/dhclient the 'ip route add' command is 
failing. It returns "ip: RTNETLINK answers: Network is unreachable".

This problem has been seen both on real hardware (like my laptop) and both 
qemu and vmware. I'm able to reproduce it consistently. I've never seen 
the problem during installations using images based on 2.6.8 or 2.6.11.
It happens both when using DHCP and for static net configuration.

I've been trying to trace the problem using several different daily 
netinst images (using 2.6.12) and the official Sarge netinst (using 
2.6.8) for comparison and using different network devices/modules.

The error happens both when dhclient is run from netcfg and when it's run 
from VT2 in busybox. A log with set -x in /etc/dhclient-script is 
attached.

I've also run an strace on the 'ip route add' command. Attached are an 
strace for the failed command and one for a successful command from a 
2.6.8 install.

Currently I'm unsure whether this is a kernel problem, a d-i problem, a 
busybox problem and/or related to other changes in unstable (like gcc 
transition). I've reached the end of my skills, somebody else needs to 
take over from here.
I'm submitting this bug against dhcp-client-udeb because that's where it 
manifests itself, but feel free to add info and reassign.

Internet Software Consortium DHCP Client 2.0pl5
Copyright 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999 The Internet Software Consortium.
All rights reserved.

Please contribute if you find this software useful.
For info, please visit http://www.isc.org/dhcp-contrib.html

+ set -e
+ [ -n  ]
+ [ -n  ]
+ [ -n  ]
+ [ -n  ]
+ ip link set lo up
+ sleep 1
+ exit 0
+ set -e
+ [ -n  ]
+ [ -n  ]
+ [ -n  ]
+ [ -n  ]
+ ip link set eth0 up
+ sleep 1
+ exit 0
Listening on LPF/lo/
Sending on   LPF/lo/
Listening on LPF/eth0/00:0c:29:cb:57:af
Sending on   LPF/eth0/00:0c:29:cb:57:af
Sending on   Socket/fallback/fallback-net
DHCPDISCOVER on lo to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 6
DHCPREQUEST on eth0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67
DHCPACK from 172.16.249.254
+ set -e
+ [ -n 255.255.255.0 ]
+ ptom 255.255.255.0
+ new_mask=/24
+ [ -n  ]
+ [ -n 172.16.249.255 ]
+ new_broadcast_arg=broadcast 172.16.249.255
+ [ -n  ]
+ set_hostname
+ cat /proc/sys/kernel/hostname
+ local current_hostname=
+ [ -z  ]
+ echo 
+ [ -n  ]
+ [ -n  ]
+ [ -z  ]
+ ip link set eth0 up
+ ip addr flush dev eth0
+ ip addr add 172.16.249.130/24 broadcast 172.16.249.255 dev eth0
+ ip route add default via 172.16.249.2
ip: RTNETLINK answers: Network is unreachable
bound to 172.16.249.130 -- renewal in 900 seconds.


dhclient_2.6.12.strace.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data


dhclient_2.6.8.strace.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data


pgpBSTUSZD8Nh.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#225693: #225693 boot-floppies should never go into sarge

2005-08-13 Thread Frans Pop
reopen 225693
retitle boot-floppies should never migrate to testing
thanks

Oops. boot-floppies is the source package and that still _is_ in unstable.
There is also a bug in the BTS website which led me astray here...


pgp38HKiKvP0O.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#333217: discover1: ftbfs [sparc] error: too few arguments to function 'init_lst'

2005-10-11 Thread Frans Pop
On Tuesday 11 October 2005 13:17, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> Please try the attached patch and see if the generated binary works.

Compiles and runs fine on my Ultra 10.

Output of old and new versions attached.

Cheers,
FJP

Reading PCI hardware database...
Reading PCI hardware database...
Reading PCI hardware database...
Reading USB hardware database...
Reading USB hardware database...
Reading USB hardware database...
Reading PCMCIA hardware database...
Reading PCMCIA hardware database...
Reading PCMCIA hardware database...
Reading SBUS hardware database...
Reading SBUS hardware database...
Reading SBUS hardware database...
Reading PCI hardware database...
Reading PCI hardware database...
Reading PCI hardware database...
Reading USB hardware database...
Reading USB hardware database...
Reading USB hardware database...
Reading PCMCIA hardware database...
Reading PCMCIA hardware database...
Reading PCMCIA hardware database...
Reading SBUS hardware database...
Reading SBUS hardware database...
Reading SBUS hardware database...
Reading PCI hardware database...
Reading PCI hardware database...
Reading PCI hardware database...
Reading USB hardware database...
Reading USB hardware database...
Reading USB hardware database...
Reading PCMCIA hardware database...
Reading PCMCIA hardware database...
Reading PCMCIA hardware database...
Reading SBUS hardware database...
Reading SBUS hardware database...
Reading SBUS hardware database...

Probing PCI cards...
Found Sun Microsystems Computer Corp. Ultra IIi (Unknown)
Found Sun Microsystems Computer Corp. Simba Advanced PCI Bridge (bridge)
Found Sun Microsystems Computer Corp. Simba Advanced PCI Bridge (bridge)
Found Syba Tech Ltd Parallel Port Card 2xEPP (bridge)
Found Sun Microsystems Computer Corp. EBUS (Unknown)
Found Sun Microsystems Computer Corp. Happy Meal (ethernet)
Found ATI Technologies, Inc. 3D Rage I/II 215GT [Mach64 GT] (video)
Found CMD Technology Inc PCI0646 (Unknown)

Probing USB devices...

Probing SBUS devices...

Probing parallel ports...
Found [/dev/lp1]
Found [/dev/lp2]

Probing serial ports...
Found [/dev/ttyS0]
Found [/dev/ttyS1]


discover.old
Description: application/trash


pgp2zzXkLdNCz.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#333835: ctrlproxy: Eats up memory making the system unusable

2005-10-13 Thread Frans Pop
Package: ctrlproxy
Version: 2.6.2-1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software

After running ctrlproxy for a fairly long time as daemon:
Mem: 30180  29248932  0   1336   5596
-/+ buffers/cache:  22316   7864
Swap:60440  60440  0

After killing ctrlproxy and starting it again:
 total   used   free sharedbuffers cached
Mem: 30180  17168  13012  0   1508   7412
-/+ buffers/cache:   8248  21932
Swap:60440   3576  56864

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i586)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-2-586tsc
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages ctrlproxy depends on:
ii  libc6  2.3.2.ds1-22  GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libglib2.0-0   2.6.4-1   The GLib library of C routines
ii  libpopt0   1.7-5 lib for parsing cmdline parameters
ii  libssl0.9.70.9.7e-3  SSL shared libraries
ii  libxml22.6.16-7  GNOME XML library
ii  zlib1g 1:1.2.2-4.sarge.2 compression library - runtime

-- no debconf information


pgpHhHOjfJ9RT.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#334613: tetex-bin: fmtutil-sys fails during package package setup

2005-10-19 Thread Frans Pop
Package: tetex-bin
Version: 3.0-9
Followup-For: Bug #334613

I've seen the same problem, with the following extra note.
Setting up tetex-bin was retried automatically, and that time
succeeded. After that tetex-extra could be set up and it appears
that the total installation was successful.

Upgrade log (partial) attached.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-16.0508-2
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages tetex-bin depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.4.58 Debian configuration management sy
ii  debianutils   2.15   Miscellaneous utilities specific t
ii  dpkg  1.13.11.0.1package maintenance system for Deb
ii  ed0.2-20 The classic unix line editor
ii  libc6 2.3.5-7GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libgcc1   1:4.0.2-2  GCC support library
ii  libice6   6.8.2.dfsg.1-9 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii  libkpathsea4  3.0-9  path search library for teTeX (run
ii  libpaper1 1.1.14-3   Library for handling paper charact
ii  libpng12-01.2.8rel-5 PNG library - runtime
ii  libsm66.8.2.dfsg.1-9 X Window System Session Management
ii  libstdc++64.0.2-2The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libt1-5   5.1.0-2Type 1 font rasterizer library - r
ii  libx11-6  6.8.2.dfsg.1-9 X Window System protocol client li
ii  libxaw8   6.8.2.dfsg.1-9 X Athena widget set library
ii  libxext6  6.8.2.dfsg.1-9 X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii  libxmu6   6.8.2.dfsg.1-9 X Window System miscellaneous util
ii  libxp66.8.2.dfsg.1-9 X Window System printing extension
ii  libxpm4   6.8.2.dfsg.1-9 X pixmap library
ii  libxt66.8.2.dfsg.1-9 X Toolkit Intrinsics
ii  mime-support  3.35-1 MIME files 'mime.types' & 'mailcap
ii  perl  5.8.7-7Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 
ii  sed   4.1.4-4The GNU sed stream editor
ii  tetex-base3.0-9  Basic library files of teTeX
ii  ucf   2.002  Update Configuration File: preserv
ii  xlibs 6.8.2.dfsg.1-9 X Window System client libraries m
ii  zlib1g1:1.2.3-6  compression library - runtime

Versions of packages tetex-bin recommends:
pn  libxml-parser-perl (no description available)
pn  perl-tk(no description available)
pn  psutils(no description available)
ii  whiptail  0.51.6-31  Displays user-friendly dialog boxe

-- debconf information:
  tetex-bin/updmap-failed:
  tetex-bin/hyphen: french[=patois], ngerman[=naustrian-neue_Rechtschreibung]
  tetex-bin/oldcfg: true
  tetex-bin/upd_map: true
  tetex-bin/cnf_name:
  tetex-bin/fmtutil: true
  tetex-bin/use_debconf: false
  tetex-bin/fmtutil-failed:
Setting up tetex-base (3.0-9) ...
Installing new version of config file /etc/texmf/latex/texsys.cfg ...
Installing new version of config file /etc/texmf/latex/color.cfg ...
Installing new version of config file /etc/texmf/latex/graphics.cfg ...
Installing new version of config file /etc/texmf/context/texexec.ini ...
Installing new version of config file /etc/texmf/context/cont-usr.tex ...
Installing new version of config file /etc/texmf/modes.mf ...
Installing new version of config file /etc/texmf/dvips/config.ps ...
Installing new version of config file /etc/texmf/dvips/config.pdf ...
Installing new version of config file /etc/texdoctk/texdoctk.dat ...
Using obsolete pdftex.cfg to generate pdftexconfig.tex ... done.
Removing obsolete, unchanged conffile /etc/texmf/latex/latex.ini
Removing obsolete, unchanged conffile /etc/texmf/cyrplain/cyrtex.ini
Removing obsolete, unchanged conffile /etc/texmf/cyrplain/cyrtxinf.ini
Removing obsolete, unchanged conffile /etc/texmf/cyrplain/cyramstx.ini
Removing obsolete, unchanged conffile /etc/texmf/etex/etex.ini
Removing obsolete, unchanged conffile /etc/texmf/platex/platex.ini
Removing obsolete, unchanged conffile /etc/texmf/context/cont-de.ini
Removing obsolete, unchanged conffile /etc/texmf/context/cont-en.ini
Removing obsolete, unchanged conffile /etc/texmf/context/cont-it.ini
Removing obsolete, unchanged conffile /etc/texmf/context/cont-nl.ini
Removing obsolete, unchanged conffile /etc/texmf/context/cont-ro.ini
Removing obsolete, unchanged conffile /etc/texmf/context/cont-uk.ini
Removing obsolete, unchanged conffile /etc/texmf/context/cont-cz.ini
Replacing config file /etc/texmf/mktex.cnf with new version
Replacing config file /et

Bug#333835: ctrlproxy: Eats up memory making the system unusable

2005-10-24 Thread Frans Pop
On Monday 24 October 2005 17:46, Faidon Liambotis wrote:
> Moreover, I highly doubt that memory leak bugs are justified as
> severity "critical".

For regular applications I would agree. For an application that runs as a 
daemon and is likely to run permanently on a server, I think an RC 
severity is waranted.


pgptSA0wcZA2l.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#322723: Reassign #322723

2005-08-15 Thread Frans Pop
reassign 322723 linux-2.6
retitle 322723 D-I: 'id route add' fails w/ "Network is unreachable"
thanks

We have just tested this issue using an installer with the busybox version 
from Sarge and the error shows up then as well.
We feel this makes the kernel the most likely source of the problem.


pgp6LBWnwM61M.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#322723: Bug#323143: ip neigh flush (iproute) hangs because CONFIG_ATM_CLIP=y

2005-08-16 Thread Frans Pop
On Tuesday 16 August 2005 19:35, Andres Salomon wrote:
> > Regarding this problem with iproute:
> >
> >   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=282492
> >
> > Would it be possible to include a fix for this, or at least make
> > CONFIG_ATM_CLIP a module instead of a yes in the stock kernel?
> > I'm suffering it right now, and it is the only reason that forces
> > me to compile my own kernels...
> > Thanks,
>
> This should probably be the case anyways, as it appears to be marked
> EXPERIMENTAL, and the config does support tristate.  Not only that, but
> it's configured differently across different archs; definitely a
> candidate for a global config.

Could this also be the cause of #322723 (d-i installs failing because of 
failing ip route command)? It seems somewhat similar.
If so, please implement the change soonest.

Cheers,
FJP


pgpnVr447rZAC.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#322723: #322723 D-I: 'id route add' fails w/ "Network is unreachable"

2005-08-18 Thread Frans Pop
With help from waldi I have done some additional tests for this issue 
yesterday and today. Here are the main results:

- the problem is still there if Sarge's 'ip' is used instead of the
  busybox version
- the problem is still there if the new linux-image-2.6.12-1-386
  (2.6.12-5) kernel is used in the installer

- the problem is *gone* if the kernel is compiled with gcc-3.3 from
  linux-source-2.6.12 (2.6.12-5)

- the problem is also gone if 'route add default gw ...' is used instead
  of 'ip route add default via ...'; this could be used as a workaround

Cheers,
FJP


pgp3JZX5amkh0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#322723: #322723 D-I: 'id route add' fails w/ "Network is unreachable"

2005-08-20 Thread Frans Pop
On Friday 19 August 2005 21:01, Bastian Blank wrote:
> - the problem is not there in the 686 image.

On request from waldi, I've compiled a -386 kernel (using gcc-4.0) with 
one change in ./debian/arch/i386/config.386:
- CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE=y
+ # CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE is not set

The problem was solved when installing from a mini.iso built using this 
kernel.


pgpTYLWFNZchx.pgp
Description: PGP signature


  1   2   3   4   5   6   >