Re: [CentOS] How to Upgrade GNOME

[Tru Huynh]

On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 11:16:14AM +0530, Sadaruwan Samaraweera wrote:
> Hi,
> 
>  Can any one tell me how to upgrade from the current GNOME version to
> a new version with out upgrading my distribution.
> 
If you "need" to upgrade gnome, then you don't really need CentOS.
Read more about the purpose of Enterprise linux distributions.

Tru
-- 
Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance)
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B


pgpBFMrclpk2I.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] libapr issue - CentOS 4.7

[Tom Brown]

I've had a similar problem, and it was a software that had a custom
version of gdbm library and set LD_LIBRARY_PATH in profile to make
sure that version would be used.

Do you have LD_LIBRARY_PATH set? What does this command say:

# echo $LD_LIBRARY_PATH

If you do, try unsetting it before starting httpd:

# LD_LIBRARY_PATH= service httpd start
  


thanks for the thought but LD_LIBRARY_PATH was not set - just for kicks 
i unset it anyhow and tried again - no dice


# export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=
# /etc/init.d/httpd start
Starting httpd: /usr/sbin/httpd: symbol lookup error: 
/usr/lib/libaprutil-0.so.0: undefined symbol: gdbm_errno

  [FAILED]

i am stumped! i wish i could rebuild the box but i cant
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] libapr issue - CentOS 4.7

[Tom Brown]

After this, what does

# ls -l /usr/lib/libaprutil-0.so.0

link to?



it seems to be getting changed back!!

# rm -f /usr/lib/libaprutil-0.so.0
# ln -s /usr/lib/libaprutil-0.so.0.9.4 /usr/lib/libaprutil-0.so.0
# ls -l /usr/lib/libaprutil-0.so.0
/usr/lib/libaprutil-0.so.0 -> /usr/lib/libaprutil-0.so.0.9.4

# ldconfig
# ls -l /usr/lib/libaprutil-0.so.0
/usr/lib/libaprutil-0.so.0 -> libaprutil-0.so.0.9.6


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Virtual NICs (aliases like eth0:1) won't come up after reboot

[Berend Dekens]

With one problem down I still have another remaining. Since the 
installation of our primairy webserver we have had a problem with the 
network aliasses.


Our server has 8 IP adresses so we used the tool provided in the GUI to 
specify (and name - for our own convinience) eth0 aliasses with the 
other 7 adresses. After setting them up, applying them, activating them 
and restarting 'networking' (I dare say this is a lot of button pushing 
just to enable one NIC) all is well and every program can use its 
preferred IP.


However, after a reboot, all aliasses are disabled: they are present in 
the configuration but they are not activated. I feared I did something 
wrong so I removed all addresses, tried to find more clues in the docs 
and now I'm back where I started.


How can I figure out what is wrong? I might add that I am not afraid of 
using a console (actually prefer it on linux servers) but I am new to 
CentOS so I tried to do everything by using the GUI - which in this case 
keeps failing...


Regards,
Berend Dekens
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Virtual NICs (aliases like eth0:1) won't come up after reboot

[Ralph Angenendt]

Berend Dekens wrote:
> However, after a reboot, all aliasses are disabled: they are present in  
> the configuration but they are not activated. I feared I did something  
> wrong so I removed all addresses, tried to find more clues in the docs  
> and now I'm back where I started.

Go into /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts and edit the corresponding files
in there.

If they have "ONBOOT=YES" change that to "ONPARENT=YES". If they have
neither, add ONPARENT=YES.

Cheers,

Ralph


pgpPw2oD4wWzQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 45, Issue 7

[centos-announce-request]

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can reach the person managing the list at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. CESA-2008:0957 Important CentOS 5 i386 kernel Update
  (Karanbir Singh)
   2. CESA-2008:0957 Important CentOS 5 x86_64 kernel   Update
  (Karanbir Singh)
   3. CESA-2008:0967 Moderate CentOS 5 i386 httpd Update
  (Karanbir Singh)
   4. CESA-2008:0967 Moderate CentOS 5 x86_64 httpd Update
  (Karanbir Singh)
   5. CESA-2008:0977-01: Critical CentOS 2 i386 seamonkey security
  update (John Newbigin)


--

Message: 1
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 22:39:00 +
From: Karanbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0957 Important CentOS 5 i386
kernel  Update
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0957 Important

Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0957.html

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently 
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) 

i386:
79548e1af005f9945ac992c56b112c63  kernel-2.6.18-92.1.18.el5.i686.rpm
18605683d0632daed9646cd8f015bdb8  kernel-debug-2.6.18-92.1.18.el5.i686.rpm
be166249c4313f557247c6af6b9666f0  kernel-debug-devel-2.6.18-92.1.18.el5.i686.rpm
226c5d1d6a1d7c4d28d90e225268737c  kernel-devel-2.6.18-92.1.18.el5.i686.rpm
d4108276e9fe6a5d40765052d508a36e  kernel-doc-2.6.18-92.1.18.el5.noarch.rpm
b1885461c579f7b45f1aa879fe3fc425  kernel-headers-2.6.18-92.1.18.el5.i386.rpm
2c1b5dfc9ec65490235e21c6ec36ca88  kernel-PAE-2.6.18-92.1.18.el5.i686.rpm
b536cc04b5ed5e62fbfed9fce5d9650f  kernel-PAE-devel-2.6.18-92.1.18.el5.i686.rpm
d192b2ab5853e4069c1fdff6e26b61d2  kernel-xen-2.6.18-92.1.18.el5.i686.rpm
23086969f848d0393891780c1416ad6d  kernel-xen-devel-2.6.18-92.1.18.el5.i686.rpm

Source:
43cd1e50fcda25e6110430a7a8abb3f6  kernel-2.6.18-92.1.18.el5.src.rpm


-- 
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, [EMAIL PROTECTED]



--

Message: 2
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 22:39:05 +
From: Karanbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0957 Important CentOS 5 x86_64
kernel  Update
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0957 Important

Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0957.html

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently 
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) 

x86_64:
3b39f26b2ac7447a2811eb195174fa82  kernel-2.6.18-92.1.18.el5.x86_64.rpm
5f9bf962f1c6aed793c2eb78f26902e7  kernel-debug-2.6.18-92.1.18.el5.x86_64.rpm
31fbdb5edda80560e4c8f10606247966  
kernel-debug-devel-2.6.18-92.1.18.el5.x86_64.rpm
640a3fadef3b11c0567e1c977fbf3903  kernel-devel-2.6.18-92.1.18.el5.x86_64.rpm
24f654c336c52cc78c69a64a3dca0d75  kernel-doc-2.6.18-92.1.18.el5.noarch.rpm
7e96de43499d64f48ff56c4b199c4ee8  kernel-headers-2.6.18-92.1.18.el5.x86_64.rpm
0e170089528621c4f8b32a3468c7c1bd  kernel-xen-2.6.18-92.1.18.el5.x86_64.rpm
e16d560c2b9712a259bb2e2fa66e13d5  kernel-xen-devel-2.6.18-92.1.18.el5.x86_64.rpm

Source:
43cd1e50fcda25e6110430a7a8abb3f6  kernel-2.6.18-92.1.18.el5.src.rpm


-- 
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, [EMAIL PROTECTED]



--

Message: 3
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 23:04:59 +
From: Karanbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0967 Moderate CentOS 5 i386 httpd
Update
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0967 Moderate

Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0967.html

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently 
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) 

i386:
4c3f6975e94f44aafc7f7232f9a80d7e  httpd-2.2.3-11.el5_2.centos.4.i386.rpm
0deca8309af3ac083a6e3a2744e4eb74  httpd-devel-2.2.3-11.el5_2.centos.4.i386.rpm
a0b417192fe7dbff00991d3f494001e9  httpd-manual-2.2.3-11.el5_2.centos.4.i386.rpm
e31e9b49033c59b3fe67c3f106d6ebe8  mod_ssl-2.2.3-11.el5_2.centos.4.i386.rpm

Source:
fd0efd0d6a620372f79d1eb37efc14c4  httpd-2.2.3-11.el5_2.centos.4.src.rpm



Packages for this update are being reissued due to a problem in the release tag 
for the packages. For more details look at : 
http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=3236




-- 
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z0

Re: [CentOS] SVN missing libexpat.so.0 while it is present *SOLVED*

[Dag Wieers]

On Thu, 13 Nov 2008, Berend Dekens wrote:

I just found out that the other machine holding the SVN repository was 
recently updated. So after trying on that one I got the same error! (Which 
ofcourse made me think)


It seems that SVN invokes a remote copy of the binary for reading the repo 
and simply pipes back the results... So while I got an error telling me 
libexpat was not found, the error originated from the other server...


That is both funny and concerning. I think you should bring this up on the 
subversion mailinglist (or open a bug for it on the subversion bug 
tracking system). More people may fall in this trap.


--
--   dag wieers,  [EMAIL PROTECTED],  http://dag.wieers.com/   --
[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] How to Upgrade GNOME

[Robert Moskowitz]

Sadaruwan Samaraweera wrote:

Hi,

 Can any one tell me how to upgrade from the current GNOME version to
a new version with out upgrading my distribution.


Read the archives. You DON'T want to do this


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Virtual NICs (aliases like eth0:1) won't come up after reboot

[Berend Dekens]

None of the files have ONBOOT but they do have ONPARENT...

I'll add the ONBOOT param and reboot the server tonight to see if it worked.

Cheers,
Berend

Ralph Angenendt wrote:

Berend Dekens wrote:
  
However, after a reboot, all aliasses are disabled: they are present in  
the configuration but they are not activated. I feared I did something  
wrong so I removed all addresses, tried to find more clues in the docs  
and now I'm back where I started.



Go into /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts and edit the corresponding files
in there.

If they have "ONBOOT=YES" change that to "ONPARENT=YES". If they have
neither, add ONPARENT=YES.

Cheers,

Ralph
  



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
  


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] How to Upgrade GNOME

[Jim Perrin]

On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 12:46 AM, Sadaruwan Samaraweera
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>  Can any one tell me how to upgrade from the current GNOME version to
> a new version with out upgrading my distribution.


Short answer: There is no supported way for doing this.

Longer Answer: The unsupported methods require a great deal of
gnome/RHEL/CentOS understanding in how things link together. Another
thing to keep in mind is that with a new version of gnome, several of
the underlying utilities for the gui tools are built against a
specific version. You'll either have to have 2 sets installed (which
can cause issues) or you'll have to rebuild most of the gui tools to
link to the new gnome libs., at which point you're basically not on
CentOS anymore.

-- 
During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.
George Orwell
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Virtual NICs (aliases like eth0:1) won't come up after reboot

[Kai Schaetzl]

Ralph Angenendt wrote on Thu, 13 Nov 2008 12:16:22 +0100:

> If they have "ONBOOT=YES" change that to "ONPARENT=YES". If they have
> neither, add ONPARENT=YES.

FYI: I've been creating NIC aliases with ONBOOT=yes for quite some time 
without a problem as I wasn't aware of the ONPARENT directive. I usually 
just copy the file and change it accordingly. The trap I usually run into 
is that I forget to change DEVICE.

Kai

-- 
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] atl2.ko in Centos 5

[Fabian Arrotin]

junior.listas wrote:

Somebody already get atl2.ko compiled in centos5 ???

JC


Yes .. i had to build it for my Asus Eee PC 900 , but the wiki already 
knew it : http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Laptops/Asus/Eeepc


Don't forget that i've built the kmod for the stock 5.2 kernel but it 
survives a kernel update (thanks to the `weak-updates` philosophy on el5)
If you already have a newer kernel on your box, let me know and i'll 
build a specific version if needed


--
-
Fabian Arrotin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Internet network currently down, TCP/IP packets delivered now by 
UPS/Fedex ..."




___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] libapr issue - CentOS 4.7

[Mogens Kjaer]

Tom Brown wrote:
...
> it seems to be getting changed back!!

You should have moved the 0.9.6 file before
running ldconfig, as I wrote.

If something else depends upon the 0.9.6 file, this
could be started after having set LD_LIBRARY_PATH
to the directory where you've moved the 0.9.6 file.

Mogens

-- 
Mogens Kjaer, Carlsberg A/S, Computer Department
Gamle Carlsberg Vej 10, DK-2500 Valby, Denmark
Phone: +45 33 27 53 25, Mobile: +45 22 12 53 25
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage: http://www.crc.dk
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] SVN missing libexpat.so.0 while it is present

[Ralph Angenendt]

John wrote:
> John wrote:
> > Sometimes conlflicts can be created between the two. RPM and Yum. 
> 
> No.
> 
> > Run rpm --rebuilddb
> 
> How is that supposed to help in this case?
> 
> Ralph
> 
> Was hoping you could explain? :-) Now I think about it I cant either :-)

No, I cannot explain how that would help in this case - it was your
idea. And no, there cannot be conflicts between "yum and rpm", as one is
the frontend for the other and there is only *one* package database in
the system.

BTW: It would be great if you could fix your mail client so one can see
which parts of a mail were written by you and which were written by
others.  - it is
written for usenet, but most of it also applies to mailing lists, if not
all.

Ralph


pgpww9ox2A8RD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Virtual NICs (aliases like eth0:1) won't come up after reboot

[Berend Dekens]

Update: Didn't help - but this time I was connected to a console so I 
could see the bootup and I get this:

"SIOCSIFFLAGS: Cannot assign requested address"

Strange thing is that I have multiple aliasses and only 3 errors...

I tried Google with this error and I see lots of people with Ubuntu 
running into that one but CentOS hasn't got the same scripts so their 
solution won't help me.


Cheers,
Berend

Berend Dekens wrote:

None of the files have ONBOOT but they do have ONPARENT...

I'll add the ONBOOT param and reboot the server tonight to see if it 
worked.


Cheers,
Berend
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Re: Virtual NICs (aliases like eth0:1) won't come up after reboot

[Tony Mountifield]

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Berend Dekens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Update: Didn't help - but this time I was connected to a console so I 
> could see the bootup and I get this:
> "SIOCSIFFLAGS: Cannot assign requested address"
> 
> Strange thing is that I have multiple aliasses and only 3 errors...
> 
> I tried Google with this error and I see lots of people with Ubuntu 
> running into that one but CentOS hasn't got the same scripts so their 
> solution won't help me.

Could you post the output of: head -20 
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0*

Cheers
Tony
-- 
Tony Mountifield
Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.softins.co.uk
Play: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://tony.mountifield.org
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Re: Virtual NICs (aliases like eth0:1) won't come up after reboot

[Berend Dekens]

Tony Mountifield wrote:

Could you post the output of: head -20 
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0*

Cheers
Tony
  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] network-scripts]# head -20 
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0*

# Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] 79c970 [PCnet32 LANCE]
DEVICE=eth0
BOOTPROTO=none
BROADCAST=87.233.3.255
HWADDR=00:0C:29:26:D9:E6
IPADDR=87.233.3.247
NETMASK=255.255.255.240
NETWORK=87.233.3.240
ONBOOT=yes
GATEWAY=87.233.3.241
TYPE=Ethernet
USERCTL=no
IPV6INIT=no
PEERDNS=yes

And for good measure the dump of our 2nd aliased NIC:
# Please read /usr/share/doc/initscripts-*/sysconfig.txt
# for the documentation of these parameters.
GATEWAY=87.233.68.193
TYPE=Ethernet
DEVICE=eth0:2
BOOTPROTO=none
NETMASK=255.255.255.224
IPADDR=87.233.68.195
USERCTL=no
IPV6INIT=no
PEERDNS=yes
ONPARENT=yes

Note that I removed the previously added ONBOOT param as I stated before 
because according to the docs it was not allowed (and it didn't made any 
difference).


Cheers,
Berend

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] close open relay

[David G. Miller]

Jerry Geis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote (with a few extraneous bits removed):


 Original Message 
>>>   
>>>   
  

 Date: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 03:33:11 PM -0500
 From: Jerry Geis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 To: CentOS ML 
 Subject: [CentOS] close open relay

 hi all, running centos 4.7 i686.

 I seem to have an o pen  r elay sendmail server.
 How do I close it?

 I have the STRAIGHT centos install sendmail.mc file.
 Only thing I changed was:
 dnl DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=smtp,Addr=127.0.0.1, Name=MTA')dnl

 so as to allow incoming email and not just localhost. however
 this seems to relay everyone.

 I looked at http://www.sendmail.org/tips/relaying but it just
 talks about (AFIKT)
 enabling specific relays to occur - not how to CLOSE the
 relaying.

 How do I close the relay?

 Jerry
 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
 
 


>>>  End Original Message 



Sure enough I tried your test and that looks good...

HOwever, when i run this test:
HELO example.com
MAIL From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RCPT To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DATA
Subject: Think we're insecure...
I have a feeling our mail server is being abused...
..
QUIT

and paste that into port 25 of my server (telnet I'm talking)
I get the email and I should not ( I presume) as I am not example.com.

Jerry
The bottom of the file /etc/sendmail.mc should look like the following 
(change my domain, davenjudy.org, to whatever is appropriate for your 
domain).  This won't get rid of any open relay problems but will at 
least fix the "example.com" issue:


...
dnl #
dnl # The following example makes mail from this host and any additional
dnl # specified domains appear to be sent from mydomain.com
dnl #
MASQUERADE_AS(`davenjudy.org')dnl
dnl #
dnl # masquerade not just the headers, but the envelope as well
dnl #
dnl FEATURE(masquerade_envelope)dnl
dnl #
dnl # masquerade not just @mydomainalias.com, but @*.mydomainalias.com 
as well

dnl #
FEATURE(masquerade_entire_domain)dnl
dnl #
dnl MASQUERADE_DOMAIN(localhost)dnl
dnl MASQUERADE_DOMAIN(localhost.localdomain)dnl
MASQUERADE_DOMAIN(local.davenjudy.org)dnl
MASQUERADE_DOMAIN(davenjudy.org)dnl

As for possibly having an open relay, you also want to make sure that 
the following line is commented out (has dnl at the beginning):


dnl #
dnl FEATURE(`relay_based_on_MX')dnl
dnl #

Finally, you'll need a line like:

FEATURE(`relay_entire_domain')dnl

DO NOT uncomment any of the other lines in sendmail.mc regarding relay 
settings unless you know what you're doing.  If you aren't sure what was 
changed from the default, remove the sendmail-cf rpm and reinstall it to 
get back to a clean, default sendmail.mc file.  It's a good idea to 
explicitly run make in /etc/mail and then bounce sendmail rather than 
let the sendmail startup script decide something has changed since it's 
easier to catch syntax errors that way.  Finally, get a free mail 
account at your provider of choice (Google, Hotmail, whoever) and use it 
for testing both sending and receiving mail.


Cheers,
Dave

--
Politics, n. Strife of interests masquerading as a contest of principles.
-- Ambrose Bierce

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] How to Upgrade GNOME

[Vandaman]

Sadaruwan Samaraweera wrote:

>  Can any one tell me how to upgrade from the current GNOME
> version to
> a new version with out upgrading my distribution.
> 

Hmm, a quick search reveals this was posted last month in the 
CentOS list by a certain Sadaruwan Samaraweera. Do you know him?
 
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2008-October/065922.html

Regards,
Vandaman.



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Re: Virtual NICs (aliases like eth0:1) won't come up after reboot

[Tony Mountifield]

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Berend Dekens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tony Mountifield wrote:
> > Could you post the output of: head -20 
> > /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0*
> >
> > Cheers
> > Tony
> >   
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] network-scripts]# head -20 
> /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0*
> # Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] 79c970 [PCnet32 LANCE]
> DEVICE=eth0
> BOOTPROTO=none
> BROADCAST=87.233.3.255
> HWADDR=00:0C:29:26:D9:E6
> IPADDR=87.233.3.247
> NETMASK=255.255.255.240
> NETWORK=87.233.3.240
> ONBOOT=yes
> GATEWAY=87.233.3.241
> TYPE=Ethernet
> USERCTL=no
> IPV6INIT=no
> PEERDNS=yes
> 
> And for good measure the dump of our 2nd aliased NIC:
> # Please read /usr/share/doc/initscripts-*/sysconfig.txt
> # for the documentation of these parameters.
> GATEWAY=87.233.68.193
> TYPE=Ethernet
> DEVICE=eth0:2
> BOOTPROTO=none
> NETMASK=255.255.255.224
> IPADDR=87.233.68.195
> USERCTL=no
> IPV6INIT=no
> PEERDNS=yes
> ONPARENT=yes
> 
> Note that I removed the previously added ONBOOT param as I stated before 
> because according to the docs it was not allowed (and it didn't made any 
> difference).

Hmmm, in a previous post you said you had multiple aliases and three errors.
But above, you have only posted one main device and one alias. Are they ones
that succeed of fail?

The reason I said to use "head -20" and "ifcfg-eth0*" was that if you used
that command literally, it would (a) output ALL eth0 aliases, and (b) prepend
each one automatically with a filename header, assuming there is more than
one file.

It's difficult to suggest what the problem might be unless you list EVERY
interface and alias, showing at least the IP and netmask information for
each one. Otherwise we are just guessing.

When you get a moment, please read right through the following page:
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

Cheers
Tony
-- 
Tony Mountifield
Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.softins.co.uk
Play: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://tony.mountifield.org
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] CPU benchmarking tools

[Tom Brown]

Can anyone suggest a good CPU, and memory if possible, benchmarking tool 
as we have some new kit that needs benchmarks running against it.


thanks
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] linux rescue - complete list of utilities and commands?

[Lanny Marcus]

On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 10:43 AM, Phil Schaffner
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Lanny Marcus wrote:

>> Question: Is there a complete list somewhere, of which System
>> Utilities and Commands are available, if one boots into "linux
>> rescue"?
>
> If rescue mode manages to mount your installed system on /mnt/sysimage it
> automatically adds elements to the path including
> /mnt/sysimage/bin:/mnt/sysimage/usr/bin:/mnt/sysimage/usr/sbin:/mnt/sysimage/sbin:/mnt/sysimage/usr/X11R6/bin,
> so it depends on what you have installed.
>
> Typing  at the command prompt after skipping the mounting or
> removing the /mnt/sysimage elements of the PATH variable (e.g.
> PATH=/bin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/usr/sbin) shows 438 available commands for the 5.2
> DVD booted in rescue mode.  Won't try to include them all here.

Thanks Phil. 421 on this box. Nice to know!
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] CPU benchmarking tools

[John R Pierce]

Tom Brown wrote:
Can anyone suggest a good CPU, and memory if possible, benchmarking 
tool as we have some new kit that needs benchmarks running against it.



measure your application performance.   anything else is BS.


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] xmms-flac missing dependency

[Lanny Marcus]

On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 12:27 PM, Karanbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Lanny Marcus wrote:
>> I tried. I sent an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] but apparently
>> one must be a member of that list, to send messages to the list.

> much like any other list. including this one.

I know but yesterday I didn't have time to join the rpmforge list.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] xmms-flac missing dependency

[Lanny Marcus]

On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 1:12 PM, MHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 9:24 AM, Lanny Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 11:59 AM, Karanbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Lanny Marcus wrote:

>>> So you better let them know real quick so they can fix it real quick!
>>
>> I tried. I sent an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] but apparently
>> one must be a member of that list, to send messages to the list.
>
> Quelle surprise!
> You were, perhaps, expecting a different response?  :-)

Possibly, from their wording, I thought it might take the message,
without me joining the list. I don't think it said one must be a
member of the list to send a message, so I gave it a shot. Turns out,
one must be a member of the list.  Will try later.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] How to Upgrade GNOME

[Lanny Marcus]

On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 12:46 AM, Sadaruwan Samaraweera
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  Can any one tell me how to upgrade from the current GNOME version to
> a new version with out upgrading my distribution.

If you want the latest and greatest, you don't want to use an
Enterprise Distro. Consider moving to Fedora or Ubuntu or something
else. If you break CentOS, it is yours to fix.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] CPU benchmarking tools

[Tom Brown]

measure your application performance.   anything else is BS.



well not really as we have different CPU's from Intel and AMD and we 
want to see how these benchmark without benchmarking the apps(s) as apps 
are many and benchmarking them all against all the apps is not possible.


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] CPU benchmarking tools

[nate]

Tom Brown wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> measure your application performance.   anything else is BS.
>
>
> well not really as we have different CPU's from Intel and AMD and we
> want to see how these benchmark without benchmarking the apps(s) as apps
> are many and benchmarking them all against all the apps is not possible.


Look at the already prepared list of benchmark results at
www.spec.org, you may find a system that is similarly configured
to what your using.

nate

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] CPU benchmarking tools

[Robert Moskowitz]

Tom Brown wrote:





measure your application performance. anything else is BS.



well not really as we have different CPU's from Intel and AMD and we 
want to see how these benchmark without benchmarking the apps(s) as 
apps are many and benchmarking them all against all the apps is not 
possible. 


In this month's IEEE Spectrum magazine there is an interesting study on 
multi core CPUs and 'intensive computing' done at Sandia labs Seems like 
with the current data bus architecture, 8 core is the max for data 
access intensive applications like data mining. So I am thinking that if 
you need to move lots of data for your applications, the CPU is not the 
limiter, it is how the system moves data into and out of the CPU(s) that 
needs to be considered.



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Is there in CentOS 5 Compiz?

[happymaster23]

Hi all,

I have one maybe stupid question - is there in CentOS 5 packages of Compiz
Fusion? I am deciding between Fedora and CentOS to install it to my netbook
and this is one of most important features that I want.

Thank for replies
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Video Card

[Tom Browder]

I want to be able to use a late-model video card with either Nvidia or
ATI (AMD) chips that have the capability to use the GPU for numeric
processing through the CUDA or AMD Stream SDKs.

I can't find any good source for hardware that really works under
Linux, not to speak of Centos.  I need a specific model and brand that
a user has successfully been able to use the proprietary driver for
under Linux.

I have tried EVGA Nvidia 9500 GT with no luck.  I have also tried XFX
6300 XT (not CUDA-capable) and cannot make it work under Centos,
either

I am using Centos 5.2, x86_64 on a Gigabyte mobo with Intel Core 2 Duo.

I appreciate any help,

-Tom

Tom Browder
Niceville, Florida
USA
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Re: Virtual NICs (aliases like eth0:1) won't come up after reboot

[Berend Dekens]

Tony Mountifield wrote:

Hmmm, in a previous post you said you had multiple aliases and three errors.
But above, you have only posted one main device and one alias. Are they ones
that succeed of fail?
  
Every one of them fails except eth0 itself (which is good or I would 
have locked myself out).

The reason I said to use "head -20" and "ifcfg-eth0*" was that if you used
that command literally, it would (a) output ALL eth0 aliases, and (b) prepend
each one automatically with a filename header, assuming there is more than
one file.
  
I used the GUI to create the interfaces: the files are not called 
'ifcfg-eth0:1' etc but they are named. But I get your point so heres the 
full listing:


[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-*
# Please read /usr/share/doc/initscripts-*/sysconfig.txt
# for the documentation of these parameters.
TYPE=Ethernet
DEVICE=eth0:1
BOOTPROTO=none
NETMASK=255.255.255.0
IPADDR=10.1.1.128
USERCTL=no
IPV6INIT=no
PEERDNS=yes
ONPARENT=yes

# Please read /usr/share/doc/initscripts-*/sysconfig.txt
# for the documentation of these parameters.
GATEWAY=87.233.68.193
TYPE=Ethernet
DEVICE=eth0:2
BOOTPROTO=none
NETMASK=255.255.255.224
IPADDR=87.233.68.195
USERCTL=no
IPV6INIT=no
PEERDNS=yes
ONPARENT=yes

# Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] 79c970 [PCnet32 LANCE]
DEVICE=eth0:3
BOOTPROTO=none
IPADDR=87.233.68.194
BROADCAST=87.233.68.223
NETMASK=255.255.255.224
NETWORK=87.233.68.192
GATEWAY=87.233.68.193
TYPE=Ethernet
USERCTL=no
IPV6INIT=no
PEERDNS=yes
ONPARENT=yes
ONBOOT=yes

# Please read /usr/share/doc/initscripts-*/sysconfig.txt
# for the documentation of these parameters.
GATEWAY=87.233.68.193
TYPE=Ethernet
DEVICE=eth0:4
BOOTPROTO=none
NETMASK=255.255.255.224
IPADDR=87.233.68.196
USERCTL=no
IPV6INIT=no
PEERDNS=yes
ONPARENT=yes
ONBOOT=yes

# Please read /usr/share/doc/initscripts-*/sysconfig.txt
# for the documentation of these parameters.
GATEWAY=87.233.68.193
TYPE=Ethernet
DEVICE=eth0:5
BOOTPROTO=none
NETMASK=255.255.255.224
IPADDR=87.233.68.197
USERCTL=no
IPV6INIT=no
PEERDNS=yes
ONPARENT=yes
ONBOOT=yes

# Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] 79c970 [PCnet32 LANCE]
DEVICE=eth0
BOOTPROTO=none
BROADCAST=87.233.3.255
HWADDR=00:0C:29:26:D9:E6
IPADDR=87.233.3.247
NETMASK=255.255.255.240
NETWORK=87.233.3.240
ONBOOT=yes
GATEWAY=87.233.3.241
TYPE=Ethernet
USERCTL=no
IPV6INIT=no
PEERDNS=yes
DEVICE=lo
IPADDR=127.0.0.1
NETMASK=255.0.0.0
NETWORK=127.0.0.0

# If you're having problems with gated making 127.0.0.0/8 a martian,
# you can change this to something else (255.255.255.255, for example)
BROADCAST=127.255.255.255
ONBOOT=yes
NAME=loopback

I went over the configs a couple of times and the last attempt to 
restart one interface using ifup and ifdown did not show that error (and 
the interfaces come up) - a full networking restart gives those errors 
and once again the aliasses don't come up. Even though the networking 
script says [OK] for each interface... I'm confused...


Berend
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Virtual NICs (aliases like eth0:1) won't come up after reboot

[Kai Schaetzl]

or, at the same time while you are waiting for more replies, you could try 
starting up with only the first alias and if that succeeds try the next 
one and so on ...
If you get less errors than you have aliases it's likely that some of the 
files have simply wrong values.

Kai

-- 
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

RE: [CentOS] SVN missing libexpat.so.0 while it is present

[John]

>>Ralph Wrote:
>>BTW: It would be great if you could fix your mail client so one can see
>>which parts of a mail were written by you and which were written by
>>others.  - it is
>>written for usenet, but most of it also applies to mailing lists, if not
>>all.

JohnStanley Writes:
Ahh you mean you want ""?

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

RE: [CentOS] Video Card

[John]

>>Tom Browder Wrote:

>>I can't find any good source for hardware that really works under
>>Linux, not to speak of Centos.  I need a specific model and brand that
>>a user has successfully been able to use the proprietary driver for
>>under Linux.

JohnStanley Writes:

http://www.nvidia.com/object/IO_18897.html
Will give you the complete supported nvidia cards under linux and the 9500GT
is not Supported. Also the 6300 is not listed either.

AFAIK all cards listed on that page using the nvidia drivers will work. Now
for the ones supporting numeric processing is up to you to figure out. Maybe
you have one in mind.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] close open relay

[MHR]

On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 3:53 PM, Ross Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Nov 12, 2008, at 5:08 PM, Jerry Geis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>
>> lists-centos wrote:
>>>
>>> sorry, the start page is:
>>>
>>> 
>>>
>>>
>>> look at the headers of the original messages (probably included as
>>> attachments) that sbcglobal is sending back. it's very possible that
>>> a spammer has forged an address from your machine on their outbound
>>> spam, and sbcglobal is bouncing that, (rather than rejecting,
>>> because they haven't a clue), generating scatter-back spam.
>>>
>>>
>>>  - Rick
>>>
>>>  Original Message 
>>>
 Date: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 04:44:02 PM -0500
 From: Jerry Geis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 To: CentOS ML 
 Subject: Re: [CentOS] close open relay

 lists-centos wrote:

> You have to have changed more than just the sendmail.mc/cf to
> make a default centos sendmail setup an open mail relay.
>
> Your /etc/mail/access file is where things are defined as to what
> you  relay for. The /etc/mail/local-host-names effects what you
> accept mail for.
>
> Make certain that what you're using to test that's it's an open
> relay is reporting things correctly. There's a difference between
> sendmail being "open" (accepting mail from the outside) and an
> "open relay". The former is expected from a mail server, the
> latter is a problem.
>
> I use:
>
>  
>
> which runs through a range of tests. I tried it against your
> 24.123.23.170 mail server a few min. ago and all was fine.
>
> - Rick
>
>  Original Message 
>
>> Date: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 03:33:11 PM -0500
>> From: Jerry Geis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: CentOS ML 
>> Subject: [CentOS] close open relay
>>
>> hi all, running centos 4.7 i686.
>>
>> I seem to have an o pen  r elay sendmail server.
>> How do I close it?
>>
>> I have the STRAIGHT centos install sendmail.mc file.
>> Only thing I changed was:
>> dnl DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=smtp,Addr=127.0.0.1, Name=MTA')dnl
>>
>> so as to allow incoming email and not just localhost. however
>> this seems to relay everyone.
>>
>> I looked at http://www.sendmail.org/tips/relaying but it just
>> talks about (AFIKT)
>> enabling specific relays to occur - not how to CLOSE the
>> relaying.
>>
>> How do I close the relay?
>>
>> Jerry
>> ___
>> CentOS mailing list
>> CentOS@centos.org
>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>>
>  End Original Message 
>
>
>
>
 When I run the following I get broken web page:

 http://verify.abuse.net/cgi-bin/relaytest


 I am getting investigating all this as I am getting return emails
 from sbcglobal that I am spam.

 Jerry



 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

>>>
>>>  End Original Message 
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Sure enough I tried your test and that looks good...
>>
>> HOwever, when i run this test:
>> HELO example.com
>> MAIL From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> RCPT To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> DATA
>> Subject: Think we're insecure...
>> I have a feeling our mail server is being abused...
>> .
>> QUIT
>>
>> and paste that into port 25 of my server (telnet I'm talking)
>> I get the email and I should not ( I presume) as I am not example.com.
>
> That's not relaying. A true test is if you telnet from a public ip to your
> SMTP port and try to send an email to a domain that isn't yours, like a
> gmail account, does it go through. It shouldn't, but it should if sent from
> an internal ip.
>
> Basically you need a file of hosts/networks allowed to relay to any domain
> (your internal hosts), and a file of domains that are allowed to be relayed
> by anyone (domains you handle).
>
> Can't remember their names, look in /etc/mail/Makefile for hints.
>
> -Ross
>
>
>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>

I submit that this email is an excellent example of both the needs to
bottom-post (ONLY) and edit postings to limit the content to the
relevant material (included in its entirety on purpose, and with
absolutely NO offense to Ross intended - seriously.)

'Nuff said.

mhr
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Is there in CentOS 5 Compiz?

[Michael Schenck]

Compiz is pretty resource intensive.  As a result it will also use your 
power/(unit time) this might not be the best desktop environment for a 
netbook.  Assuming it will even play well with the netbook's video card.


Good luck,
Michael Schenck

happymaster23 wrote:

Hi all,

I have one maybe stupid question - is there in CentOS 5 packages of 
Compiz Fusion? I am deciding between Fedora and CentOS to install it 
to my netbook and this is one of most important features that I want.


Thank for replies


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
  


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] How to Upgrade GNOME

[MHR]

On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 9:46 PM, Sadaruwan Samaraweera
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>  Can any one tell me how to upgrade from the current GNOME version to
> a new version with out upgrading my distribution.
>

Short answer: you can't.

Right answer: Don't.

Long answer: Google is your friend (but CentOS won't be).

Would you like to try again next month?

mhr
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] bluetooth pand help

[Robert Moskowitz]

Help, please.

The man pand talks about a /etc/bluetooth/pan/dev-up; there is no such 
file on any of my Centos systems.


I have studied http://bluez.sourceforge.net/contrib/HOWTO-PAN, so I have 
some of the basics.



The only Centos related pand writeup I have found is 
http://howto.basjes.nl/linux/installing-my-new-server/networking.  
Should I just copy the dev-up file from there?



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Re: close open relay

[Bernard 'Tux' Lheureux]

Jerry Geis wrote:


It should be:
DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=smtp, Name=MTA')
  
I changed it to this and restarted sendmail, re-ran the test and still 
open.
To fix the OpenRelay, just edit your /etc/mail/access to have it 
something like that:


8<=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-C-U-T-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
# Check the /usr/share/doc/sendmail/README.cf file for a description
# of the format of this file. (search for access_db in that file)
# The /usr/share/doc/sendmail/README.cf is part of the sendmail-doc
# package.
#
# by default we allow relaying from localhost...
localhost.localdomainRELAY# Loopback address 
to enable local mails to be relayed
localhost   RELAY# Loopback 
address to enable local mails to be relayed
127.0.0.1 RELAY# Loopback 
address to enable local mails to be relayed
212.63.24.21   RELAY# your Public IP 
address
192.168.1.   RELAY# Your 
Internal LAN address (all mails coming from these IPs will be allowed)

yourdomain1.com RELAY# Your Domain number 1
yourdomain2.com RELAY# Your Domain 
number 2 (if you have multiple domains)

8<=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-C-U-T-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Then save your file and type this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# makemap hash /etc/mail/access < /etc/mail/access
To generate the database from the file /etc/mail/access and everytime 
you make changes in the file /etc/mail/access, you need to retype this 
command to enable the changes...


Like this only mails that will be touched by one of these conditions 
will be allowed to be relayed and every other mail will be rejected

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Is there in CentOS 5 Compiz?

[happymaster23]

Thank you for reply,

but Compiz can be easily switched off when you are on battery and the GMA950
have enough power to handle it on 1024*600 resolution. This is no problem. I
like CentOS because of its stability (and I am using it on servers), but I
don´t know how it will appear on desktop. Yes, CentOS is enterprise
operating system and Fedora is multimedia minded, but I think that CentOS is
better OS with much better HW support (isn´t it?) and this multimedia
features can be easily added.

I don´t know which one choose :(

2008/11/13 Michael Schenck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> Compiz is pretty resource intensive.  As a result it will also use your
> power/(unit time) this might not be the best desktop environment for a
> netbook.  Assuming it will even play well with the netbook's video card.
>
> Good luck,
> Michael Schenck
>
> happymaster23 wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have one maybe stupid question - is there in CentOS 5 packages of Compiz
>> Fusion? I am deciding between Fedora and CentOS to install it to my netbook
>> and this is one of most important features that I want.
>>
>> Thank for replies
>> 
>>
>> ___
>> CentOS mailing list
>> CentOS@centos.org
>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>>
>>
>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Is there in CentOS 5 Compiz?

[Michael Schenck]

CentOS is a "more secure" RHEL, I'm not at all sure where you got "better HW
support"...

By the way, you can always add a repository that has Compiz and still use
CentOS.

What kind of Netbook are you running?

That being said, I am curious to hear how compiz goes.


Best Regards,
Michael Schenck

On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 2:39 PM, happymaster23 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

> Thank you for reply,
>
> but Compiz can be easily switched off when you are on battery and the
> GMA950 have enough power to handle it on 1024*600 resolution. This is no
> problem. I like CentOS because of its stability (and I am using it on
> servers), but I don´t know how it will appear on desktop. Yes, CentOS is
> enterprise operating system and Fedora is multimedia minded, but I think
> that CentOS is better OS with much better HW support (isn´t it?) and this
> multimedia features can be easily added.
>
> I don´t know which one choose :(
>
> 2008/11/13 Michael Schenck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> Compiz is pretty resource intensive.  As a result it will also use your
>> power/(unit time) this might not be the best desktop environment for a
>> netbook.  Assuming it will even play well with the netbook's video card.
>>
>> Good luck,
>> Michael Schenck
>>
>> happymaster23 wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I have one maybe stupid question - is there in CentOS 5 packages of
>>> Compiz Fusion? I am deciding between Fedora and CentOS to install it to my
>>> netbook and this is one of most important features that I want.
>>>
>>> Thank for replies
>>> 
>>>
>>> ___
>>> CentOS mailing list
>>> CentOS@centos.org
>>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ___
>> CentOS mailing list
>> CentOS@centos.org
>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>>
>
>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
>
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Is there in CentOS 5 Compiz?

[centos]

On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 14:48:53 -0500
"Michael Schenck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> CentOS is a "more secure" RHEL, I'm not at all sure where you got
> "better HW support"...

CentOS is identical to RHEL, except for the copyrights, licensing and
logos. The keyword is identical.

Why is it more secure? Why would CentOS have better HW support?


-- 
Thanks
http://www.911networks.com
When the network has to work
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Is there in CentOS 5 Compiz?

[happymaster23]

I am going to buy Eee PC S101 (1,6 GHz Atom, 1 GB RAM, ...), but these specs
are same on most of netbooks. You can find some videos of Compiz on Eee PC
701 at youtube.com which works flawlessly, so I am convinced, that on next
generation Eee PCs (901, S101) there will be no problems even if S101 have
bigger resolution (800*480 vs. 1024*600).


Thank for replies

2008/11/13 Michael Schenck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> CentOS is a "more secure" RHEL, I'm not at all sure where you got "better
> HW support"...
>
> By the way, you can always add a repository that has Compiz and still use
> CentOS.
>
> What kind of Netbook are you running?
>
> That being said, I am curious to hear how compiz goes.
>
>
> Best Regards,
> Michael Schenck
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 2:39 PM, happymaster23 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
>> Thank you for reply,
>>
>> but Compiz can be easily switched off when you are on battery and the
>> GMA950 have enough power to handle it on 1024*600 resolution. This is no
>> problem. I like CentOS because of its stability (and I am using it on
>> servers), but I don´t know how it will appear on desktop. Yes, CentOS is
>> enterprise operating system and Fedora is multimedia minded, but I think
>> that CentOS is better OS with much better HW support (isn´t it?) and this
>> multimedia features can be easily added.
>>
>> I don´t know which one choose :(
>>
>> 2008/11/13 Michael Schenck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>>> Compiz is pretty resource intensive.  As a result it will also use your
>>> power/(unit time) this might not be the best desktop environment for a
>>> netbook.  Assuming it will even play well with the netbook's video card.
>>>
>>> Good luck,
>>> Michael Schenck
>>>
>>> happymaster23 wrote:
>>>
 Hi all,

 I have one maybe stupid question - is there in CentOS 5 packages of
 Compiz Fusion? I am deciding between Fedora and CentOS to install it to my
 netbook and this is one of most important features that I want.

 Thank for replies
 

 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


>>>
>>> ___
>>> CentOS mailing list
>>> CentOS@centos.org
>>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> CentOS mailing list
>> CentOS@centos.org
>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>>
>>
>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
>
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Is there in CentOS 5 Compiz?

[Michael Schenck]

I thought the were default configuration differences between RHEL and CentOS
such that in theory it was "more secure" out of the box.

On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 2:56 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 14:48:53 -0500
> "Michael Schenck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > CentOS is a "more secure" RHEL, I'm not at all sure where you got
> > "better HW support"...
>
> CentOS is identical to RHEL, except for the copyrights, licensing and
> logos. The keyword is identical.
>
> Why is it more secure? Why would CentOS have better HW support?
>
>
> --
> Thanks
> http://www.911networks.com
> When the network has to work
>
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Is there in CentOS 5 Compiz?

[Vandaman]

happymaster23  wrote:

> I have one maybe stupid question - is there in CentOS 5
> packages of Compiz
> Fusion? I am deciding between Fedora and CentOS to install
> it to my netbook
> and this is one of most important features that I want.
> 

Make your decision between Fedora and CentOS not on the basis
of Compiz which is described by its developers as "Alpha Software".

I have got both Fedora and CentOS and they can be described as
"different animals". CentOS is a stable server while Fedora is
a fancy smancy desktop. Some of these people asking to upgrade
should really be on the Fedora bandwagon and others complaining
about Fedora being bleeding edge should have a CentOS server.

Best of both?

Regards,
Vandaman.



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Virtual NICs (aliases like eth0:1) won't come up after reboot

[Berend Dekens]

Kai Schaetzl schreef:
or, at the same time while you are waiting for more replies, you could try 
starting up with only the first alias and if that succeeds try the next 
one and so on ...
I was doing exactly that. And I was trying to figure out how the 
networking scripts work and what they do - or don't in my case.


And after 3 hours I remember why I hate automated GUI's: its working...

I removed, renamed, manually modified and did all kinds of things to the 
network configuration using both the GUI and the console and after 
recreating (for the millionth time) the configuration for each 
interface... it worked. On one hand I'm glad it is working on the other 
hand I am dissatisfied because I have no clue what caused it and how I 
fixed it (usually I run into problems more than once so stuff like this 
is a bad omen).


On a side note, the network configuration tool keeps forgetting the 
alias number I gave to the NIC - each time I edit a configuration I need 
to set the alias number again as its back on 0.


Well at least I've got everything up and running again - thanks everyone 
for your help!


Cheers,
Berend
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] atl2.ko in Centos 5

[Eduardo Grosclaude]

On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 1:07 PM, junior.listas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

> Somebody already get atl2.ko compiled in centos5 ???
>
> JC
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>

Not exactly your question, but I managed to make it work thanks to
http://repo.redhat-club.org/redhat/5/SRPMS/
HTH

-- 
Eduardo Grosclaude
Universidad Nacional del Comahue
Neuquen, Argentina
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] kmod-xfs and weak-updates

[Tony Schreiner]

I installed kmod-xfs-0.4-2 back with kernel-2.6.18-92.1.13. I have  
updated kernels but there have been no new kmod-xfs. It still works  
because of weak-updates (I guess). Currently:


# find /lib/modules -name xfs.ko
/lib/modules/2.6.18-92.1.13.el5/extra/xfs/xfs.ko
/lib/modules/2.6.18-92.1.13.el5/weak-updates/xfs/xfs.ko
/lib/modules/2.6.18-92.1.17.el5/weak-updates/xfs/xfs.ko
/lib/modules/2.6.18-92.1.18.el5/weak-updates/xfs/xfs.ko


My question is: kernel 2.6.18-92.1.13 is now the oldest one present  
on my system and will be removed next update. Do I need to worry  
about that? Will it take the remaining kmod-xfs with it?


Tony Schreiner
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Video Card

[Tom Browder]

On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 12:53 PM, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>Tom Browder Wrote:
>
>>>I can't find any good source for hardware that really works under
>>>Linux, not to speak of Centos.  I need a specific model and brand that
>>>a user has successfully been able to use the proprietary driver for
>>>under Linux.
>
> JohnStanley Writes:
>
> http://www.nvidia.com/object/IO_18897.html
> Will give you the complete supported nvidia cards under linux and the 9500GT
> is not Supported. Also the 6300 is not listed either.

John, thanks.  I wasn't aware of that page.

Nvidia confuses the issue when it lists support with the latest
package run installation.  It states that it supports the 9500 GT.
What gives?

> AFAIK all cards listed on that page using the nvidia drivers will work. Now
> for the ones supporting numeric processing is up to you to figure out. Maybe
> you have one in mind.

Yes, that is fairly clear on the CUDA site.  And AMD has been pretty
helpful, too.

-Tom
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] kmod-xfs and weak-updates

[Ned Slider]

Tony Schreiner wrote:
I installed kmod-xfs-0.4-2 back with kernel-2.6.18-92.1.13. I have 
updated kernels but there have been no new kmod-xfs. It still works 
because of weak-updates (I guess). Currently:


# find /lib/modules -name xfs.ko
/lib/modules/2.6.18-92.1.13.el5/extra/xfs/xfs.ko
/lib/modules/2.6.18-92.1.13.el5/weak-updates/xfs/xfs.ko
/lib/modules/2.6.18-92.1.17.el5/weak-updates/xfs/xfs.ko
/lib/modules/2.6.18-92.1.18.el5/weak-updates/xfs/xfs.ko


My question is: kernel 2.6.18-92.1.13 is now the oldest one present on 
my system and will be removed next update. Do I need to worry about 
that? Will it take the remaining kmod-xfs with it?




No, you don't need to worry. Anything installed in 
/lib/modules/2.6.18-92.1.13.el5/extra/ will be left on the system when 
that kernel is uninstalled so the links in weak-updates will still be 
functional.



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Is there in CentOS 5 Compiz?

[Lanny Marcus]

On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 1:02 PM, happymaster23 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have one maybe stupid question - is there in CentOS 5 packages of Compiz
> Fusion? I am deciding between Fedora and CentOS to install it to my netbook
> and this is one of most important features that I want.

Suggest that you download the CentOS Live CD and see if CentOS will
run on your notebook and support all of the hardware. If not, try a
Fedora Live CD. Fedora will probably support more hardware than
CentOS. Make your decision between the 2 distros, if they both work on
your notebook. If not, use the distro that works.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Re: mapserver experience?

[Dave Stevens]

On Friday 07 November 2008 09:29:42 am Dave Stevens wrote:
> On Friday 07 November 2008 12:39:50 am Laurent Wandrebeck wrote:
> > 2008/11/7 Scott Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > on 11-6-2008 3:35 PM Dave Stevens spake the following:
> > >> I have Centos 5.2 and want to install mapserver. On my Fedora 7 box it
> > >> is in the repo. Should I just enable that repo? Anyone done this?
> > >> Tips/warnings?
> > >>
> > >> Dave
> >
> > I have some home build (x86_64 from src.rpm) 5.0.2 if you want.
> > Laurent.
>
> thanks, the box is 32 bit cpu.
> Dave
>
> > ___
> > CentOS mailing list
> > CentOS@centos.org
> > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

I have advice to use this repo:

http://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/publiclist/EPEL/5/

but I don't understand how to enable it. Usually I would put it into yum.conf 
but it seems yum is reading from yum.conf.d. Do I make a text snippet as a 
file or add this to another repo's file or what? Example welcome.

Dave

-- 
Canada must refuse to be entangled in any more wars fought to make the world 
safe for capitalism.

-- The Regina Manifesto, 1933
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Re: mapserver experience?

[Laurent Wandrebeck]

2008/11/13 Dave Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Friday 07 November 2008 09:29:42 am Dave Stevens wrote:
>> On Friday 07 November 2008 12:39:50 am Laurent Wandrebeck wrote:
>> > 2008/11/7 Scott Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> > > on 11-6-2008 3:35 PM Dave Stevens spake the following:
>> > >> I have Centos 5.2 and want to install mapserver. On my Fedora 7 box it
>> > >> is in the repo. Should I just enable that repo? Anyone done this?
>> > >> Tips/warnings?
>> > >>
>> > >> Dave
>> >
>> > I have some home build (x86_64 from src.rpm) 5.0.2 if you want.
>> > Laurent.
>>
>> thanks, the box is 32 bit cpu.
>> Dave
>>
>> > ___
>> > CentOS mailing list
>> > CentOS@centos.org
>> > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
> I have advice to use this repo:
>
> http://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/publiclist/EPEL/5/
>
> but I don't understand how to enable it. Usually I would put it into yum.conf
> but it seems yum is reading from yum.conf.d. Do I make a text snippet as a
> file or add this to another repo's file or what? Example welcome.
>
> Dave
you'll find everything you need here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL
Laurent
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Re: mapserver experience?

[John R Pierce]

Dave Stevens wrote:

I have advice to use this repo:

http://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/publiclist/EPEL/5/

but I don't understand how to enable it. Usually I would put it into yum.conf 
but it seems yum is reading from yum.conf.d. Do I make a text snippet as a 
file or add this to another repo's file or what? Example welcome.
  


rpm -Uvh 
http://mirrors.kernel.org/fedora-epel/5/i386/epel-release-5-3.noarch.rpm


will install the EPEL repo file.   (replace /i386/ with your architecture).


WARNING, if you have other repos like rpmforge etc etc, EPEL does NOT 
play well with others as they refuse to tag the RPM names and 
dependencies with the repo name...   I tend to go into the 
/etc/yum.repos.d/epel.repo file that installed, and change it to 
`enabled=0`, then manually enable it when I want to fetch something from it.


you also probably want to play with yum-priorities.  I'm a little fuzzy 
on the specifics here.



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Re: mapserver experience?

[Dave Stevens]

On Thursday 13 November 2008 02:09:53 pm Laurent Wandrebeck wrote:
> 2008/11/13 Dave Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On Friday 07 November 2008 09:29:42 am Dave Stevens wrote:
> >> On Friday 07 November 2008 12:39:50 am Laurent Wandrebeck wrote:
> >> > 2008/11/7 Scott Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >> > > on 11-6-2008 3:35 PM Dave Stevens spake the following:
> >> > >> I have Centos 5.2 and want to install mapserver. On my Fedora 7 box
> >> > >> it is in the repo. Should I just enable that repo? Anyone done
> >> > >> this? Tips/warnings?
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Dave
> >> >
> >> > I have some home build (x86_64 from src.rpm) 5.0.2 if you want.
> >> > Laurent.
> >>
> >> thanks, the box is 32 bit cpu.
> >> Dave
> >>
> >> > ___
> >> > CentOS mailing list
> >> > CentOS@centos.org
> >> > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> >
> > I have advice to use this repo:
> >
> > http://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/publiclist/EPEL/5/
> >
> > but I don't understand how to enable it. Usually I would put it into
> > yum.conf but it seems yum is reading from yum.conf.d. Do I make a text
> > snippet as a file or add this to another repo's file or what? Example
> > welcome.
> >
> > Dave
>
> you'll find everything you need here:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL
> Laurent

yes, lovely, thanks very much! installed and working

Dave

> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



-- 
Canada must refuse to be entangled in any more wars fought to make the world 
safe for capitalism.

-- The Regina Manifesto, 1933
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] CPU benchmarking tools

[Tom Brown]

In this month's IEEE Spectrum magazine there is an interesting study 
on multi core CPUs and 'intensive computing' done at Sandia labs Seems 
like with the current data bus architecture, 8 core is the max for 
data access intensive applications like data mining. So I am thinking 
that if you need to move lots of data for your applications, the CPU 
is not the limiter, it is how the system moves data into and out of 
the CPU(s) that needs to be considered.


will read thanks
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] kmod-xfs and weak-updates

[Karanbir Singh]

Tony Schreiner wrote:
My question is: kernel 2.6.18-92.1.13 is now the oldest one present on 
my system and will be removed next update. Do I need to worry about 
that? Will it take the remaining kmod-xfs with it?


Only files directly owned by the kernel will get removed when the kernel 
rpm is removed from your machine; which, as a policy holds true for any 
rpm. This is one of the many reasons why packagers are encouraged to 
list-and-own specific components and not complete directory tree's when 
they setup the spec files.


--
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/  : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Is there in CentOS 5 Compiz?

[Karanbir Singh]

happymaster23 wrote:
I have one maybe stupid question - is there in CentOS 5 packages of 
Compiz Fusion? I am deciding between Fedora and CentOS to install it to 
my netbook and this is one of most important features that I want.


CentOS-5 ships with Compiz included in the distro, so if you have 
hardware that is compatible, it will work out of the box.


I have built CompizFusion on CentOS-5 but its never really been stable 
with the Xorg version included in the distro, whereas Beryl ( what 
CompizFusion sort of emerged out of ) does work, and it works fine for 
me on a bunch of nvidia / intel / ati cards. The last stable version is 
the one hosted in the kbsingh-extras-testing repo for C5. More details 
on the repo are at http://wiki.centos.org/Repositories



--
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/  : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] CPU benchmarking tools

[Nifty Cluster Mitch]

On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 05:40:04PM +, Tom Brown wrote:
>>
>> measure your application performance.   anything else is BS.
>h
> well not really as we have different CPU's from Intel and AMD and we  
> want to see how these benchmark without benchmarking the apps(s) as apps  
> are many and benchmarking them all against all the apps is not possible.

Published Spec benchmarks are valuable in this fuzzy context.

Once you have your application benchmarked, tools like "lmbench"
may help you understand what the win/loss keys are.

  http://sourceforge.net/projects/lmbench

More important than hardware can be your choice of compiler and IO
(disk)...  When looking at 'spec' benchmark results pay attention to
the choice of compiler AND the hardware bits surrounding the CPU.


-- 
T o m  M i t c h e l l 
Found me a new hat, now what?

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] CPU benchmarking tools

[Rainer Duffner]

Am 13.11.2008 um 18:40 schrieb Tom Brown:






measure your application performance.   anything else is BS.



well not really as we have different CPU's from Intel and AMD and we  
want to see how these benchmark without benchmarking the apps(s) as  
apps are many and benchmarking them all against all the apps is not  
possible.





Benchmarks are worthless - your apps count.
Benchmark your applications. Period.


Rainer
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] kmod-xfs and weak-updates

[Tony Schreiner]

Karanbir Singh wrote:

Tony Schreiner wrote:
My question is: kernel 2.6.18-92.1.13 is now the oldest one present 
on my system and will be removed next update. Do I need to worry 
about that? Will it take the remaining kmod-xfs with it?


Only files directly owned by the kernel will get removed when the 
kernel rpm is removed from your machine; which, as a policy holds true 
for any rpm. This is one of the many reasons why packagers are 
encouraged to list-and-own specific components and not complete 
directory tree's when they setup the spec files.


My concern came from the fact that xfs.ko belongs to the kmod-xfs 
package and older versions kmod-xfs had a dependency on a kernel version 
and would be removed by yum when that kernel was removed. I guess that 
the latest kmod-xfs-0.4-2 does not; which I suppose I could have checked 
for myself in the first place.


Tony
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Setting up eth0 with address 0.0.0.0

[Amos Shapira]

2008/11/11 Filipe Brandenburger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Try this in ifcfg-eth0:
>
> DEVICE=eth0
> ONBOOT=yes
> TYPE=Ethernet
> IPADDR=
>
> Yes, that's an empty IPADDR variable, that is how you should configure

Hi Filipe,

It worked on the test server but on other servers were we tried it, it
turned out that they require IPADDR=0.0.0.0 to make it work.

I'm not sure what causes the difference yet (they are all up to date
CentOS 5.2) but just wanted to thank you for the tip, it allowed us to
close this issue for now.

Cheers,

--Amos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] atl2.ko in Centos 5

[junior.listas]

Sorry, may i be wrong,  but

I was compiled this module for other distro, with kernel 2.6.18, from 
http://people.redhat.com/csnook/atl2/, the the version is 2.0.5, Wy we 
use 1.0 version?? There is some note for why the module ( 2.0 ) does not 
compile under centos??


thanks for your attention...

JC



Eduardo Grosclaude escreveu:



On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 1:07 PM, junior.listas 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:


Somebody already get atl2.ko compiled in centos5 ???

JC
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org 
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Not exactly your question, but I managed to make it work thanks to 
http://repo.redhat-club.org/redhat/5/SRPMS/

HTH

--
Eduardo Grosclaude
Universidad Nacional del Comahue
Neuquen, Argentina


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
  


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos