Re: FFS: GE Mark Century programming manual

2015-07-30 Thread jwsmobile

First, thanks much, interesting to add to my collection.

Second, the early letter from Mr. Thomas Software Coordinator, "Please 
use a stick and a mallet to open this book".  Died laughing.  Way too 
early to have that sort of sense of humor.


Stakes thru the heart, or silver bullet, shoot it it's dead, Jim.

Thanks
Jim

On 7/29/2015 11:47 AM, Jason T wrote:

Here's a beast of a manual that I've scanned and posted.  Will send
the original for the cost of shipping (assume at least 5lbs of paper
here, coming from 60070.)

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/13043699/pics/GECENT.jpg

Scan is here:

http://chiclassiccomp.org/docs/index.php?dir=%2Fcomputing/GE

Looks like numerical control for machining, not strictly a "computer"
but certainly an early programmable device.  1970 edition but the
earliest date on it is 1962.  Can deliver to VCFMW.

j






Re: Wanted: IBM AS/400 in NY for a film

2015-07-30 Thread Sean Caron
Aha ... I first saw the request and thought it was strange that a film
would be so specific but I guess the AS/400 they ran has attained some
notoriety of its own:

http://www.itjungle.com/tfh/tfh021609-printer01.html
http://www.itjungle.com/tfh/tfh111609-story05.html

I guess I've gotta give them credit for shooting for technical correctness
:O Too bad it's only "set dressing" and we don't get to see any snippets of
an interactive session on screen.

Best,

Sean


On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 6:18 PM, Nigel Williams <
n...@retrocomputingtasmania.com> wrote:

>
> > On 30 Jul 2015, at 7:12 am, Mike Ross  wrote:
> > Interesting. So Bernie Madoff used an AS/400?
>
> ahh bingo! I found this comment on the Amazon book review:
>
> "The description of the ancient 1988 IBM AS 400 and the terminals from a
> 1970's spy film that were still cranking away on the 17th floor when Madoff
> went under is priceless.”
>
> If movie-makers are going for authenticity then they will want a white-box
> AS/400
>
>
> https://www-03.ibm.com/ibm/history/exhibits/rochester/images/overlay/4506VV4010.jpg
>
>
>


Re: Wanted: IBM AS/400 in NY for a film

2015-07-30 Thread Sean Caron
I got caught on this line of inquiry and found a neat article in FT that
also discusses a little bit the IT operations of BLMIS. They name check
Stratus as well as IBM ... it's too bad his character wasn't as good as his
taste in EDP equipment!

http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/89542248-9821-11de-8d3d-00144feabdc0.html

Best,

Sean


On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 6:36 PM, Sean Caron  wrote:

> Aha ... I first saw the request and thought it was strange that a film
> would be so specific but I guess the AS/400 they ran has attained some
> notoriety of its own:
>
> http://www.itjungle.com/tfh/tfh021609-printer01.html
> http://www.itjungle.com/tfh/tfh111609-story05.html
>
> I guess I've gotta give them credit for shooting for technical correctness
> :O Too bad it's only "set dressing" and we don't get to see any snippets of
> an interactive session on screen.
>
> Best,
>
> Sean
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 6:18 PM, Nigel Williams <
> n...@retrocomputingtasmania.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> > On 30 Jul 2015, at 7:12 am, Mike Ross  wrote:
>> > Interesting. So Bernie Madoff used an AS/400?
>>
>> ahh bingo! I found this comment on the Amazon book review:
>>
>> "The description of the ancient 1988 IBM AS 400 and the terminals from a
>> 1970's spy film that were still cranking away on the 17th floor when Madoff
>> went under is priceless.”
>>
>> If movie-makers are going for authenticity then they will want a
>> white-box AS/400
>>
>>
>> https://www-03.ibm.com/ibm/history/exhibits/rochester/images/overlay/4506VV4010.jpg
>>
>>
>>
>


Re: Wanted: IBM AS/400 in NY for a film

2015-07-30 Thread Evan Koblentz


I received this email - they want am IBM AS/400 for a film - it 
doesn't have to work. They will pay for transportation and rent. Near 
Brooklyn NY I think.


And what will they pay for damage or destruction?


MARCH is working on this deal, since metro NYC is our backyard.

For anyone interested: we always require a signed contract with strict 
rules about how our artifacts can/can't be used by renters. In the past 
few years we did most of the computers for "The Americans", "Halt & 
Catch Fire", Apple/MSFT episode of "American Genius", and a major 
Hollywood film that I can't reveal, along with several smaller deals. In 
each case, the contract requires proof of their insurance; numerous 
rules about transportation, storage, and (of course) actual usage; and 
additional rules requiring MARCH delegates to on-site if anything needs 
to be up and running. Everything from wrapping to power to proximity of 
any open beverages is covered. Related: there are some artifacts we 
won't rent at any price due to value/rarity/size/etc.


Re: Reforming capacitors (technical description, not politics)

2015-07-30 Thread Dale H. Cook
At 4:10 PM 7/29/2015, drlegendre wrote:

>... I have somewhere a document from Mallory ... that describes the evolution 
>of the multi-section aluminum can electrolytic ...

And at 09:43 PM 7/29/2015, Eric Smith wrote:

>Definitely *very* interested.

As am I. I have quite a bit of old Mallory literature in-house but don't recall 
seeing that.

Dale H. Cook, Roanoke/Lynchburg, VA
Osborne 1 / Kaypro 4-84 / Kaypro 1 / Amstrad PPC-640
http://plymouthcolony.net/starcity/radios/index.html 



Re: Reforming capacitors (technical description, not politics)

2015-07-30 Thread Diane Bruce
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 08:58:08PM -0500, drlegendre . wrote:
> I get the jab you're taking at latter-day Audiophool idiocy, but you won't
> find any gold-plated OFC business in any of the vintage gear I typically
> work with.
> 
> But as far as gold plating goes, gold is a good conductor, it solders very
> well, it doesn't tarnish and its ductility promotes solid connections on
> screw terminals - it's really these characteristics that make it somewhat
> desirable in certain applications. So it's not so much that gold "sounds
> better", it's that it allows one to make connections that work better.

Gold is also something they cannot use in outer space due to gold embrittlement
problems.

http://www.eptaccanada.ca/webinars/presentations/eptac_10_17_12.pdf


> 
> But it does tend to wear quickly.
> 

- Diane VA3DB
-- 
- d...@freebsd.org d...@db.net http://www.db.net/~db


Re: Reforming capacitors (technical description, not politics)

2015-07-30 Thread Tothwolf

On Wed, 29 Jul 2015, drlegendre . wrote:

On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 5:19 PM, Fred Cisin  wrote:

On Wed, 29 Jul 2015, drlegendre . wrote:

Incidentally, what exactly differentiates a computer-grade cap from 
any other alum. electrolytic?


Maybe computer-grade don't need gold-plated oxygen-free leads?


I get the jab you're taking at latter-day Audiophool idiocy, but you 
won't find any gold-plated OFC business in any of the vintage gear I 
typically work with.


But as far as gold plating goes, gold is a good conductor, it solders 
very well, it doesn't tarnish and its ductility promotes solid 
connections on screw terminals - it's really these characteristics that 
make it somewhat desirable in certain applications. So it's not so much 
that gold "sounds better", it's that it allows one to make connections 
that work better. But it does tend to wear quickly.


While I don't want to go /too/ OT here, I do want to clear up one common 
misconception regarding gold plating. It isn't that gold itself wets 
easily when soldering...the tin content of the solder actually dissolves 
the gold and the solder bonds to the underlying metal surface.


This can also lead to gold embrittlement of the solder joint, and while it 
generally wasn't as big of an issue with larger through-hole solder joints 
(such as with older semiconductors which had gold plated leads), it did 
become a major issue for SMD boards with gold plated pads, and especially 
with BGA components.


This is why in high reliability applications, industry practice has been 
to pre-tin gold plated surfaces which are to be soldered, using a two step 
solder bath. The first being more sacrificial which will collect much of 
the gold, and a second to catch anything which might still be left.


Re: Reforming capacitors (technical description, not politics)

2015-07-30 Thread Tothwolf

On Wed, 29 Jul 2015, Charles Dickman wrote:

On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 3:34 AM, Eric Smith  wrote:

Some people seem to think that "reforming" an aluminum electrolytic 
capacitor is some kind of cheat, akin to zapping NiCd cells or 
rejuvenating CRTs. Actually reforming is the same electrochemical




Reforming is standard practice with industrial motor drives. 
Manufactures (ABB, Allen-Bradley, Siemens) will require that a drive 
that is not powered for a year or more have the DC bus capacitors 
reformed or any warrantees could be voided. The procedures they 
recommend are very similar to those that have been discussed here. ABB 
suggests a 3phase rectifier and current limitting power resistor or a 
current limiting DC (1000V) power supply.


VFD manufacturers are also very specific about the lifetime ratings of the 
large capacitors used in these units, and often specify that they are to 
be replaced after X number of power on hours. VFD's also aren't /just/ 
used for process machinery...they are also used for air handling 
equipment, and with a large facility, you /really/ do not want that sort 
of critical equipment to spontaneously fail.


RE: Wanted: IBM AS/400 in NY for a film

2015-07-30 Thread dwight
I'd think a ridiculously high deposit alone with the contract
would ensure proper use.
Simply state if it is damaged in any way, they keep the computer
and you keep the deposit.
I've done similar in the past and always got things back.
Dwight

 
> Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 07:08:59 -0400
> From: e...@snarc.net
> To: gene...@classiccmp.org; classiccmp.org:On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts 
> cctalk@classiccmp.org
> Subject: Re: Wanted: IBM AS/400 in NY for a film
> 
> 
> >> I received this email - they want am IBM AS/400 for a film - it 
> >> doesn't have to work. They will pay for transportation and rent. Near 
> >> Brooklyn NY I think.
> >
> > And what will they pay for damage or destruction?
> 
> MARCH is working on this deal, since metro NYC is our backyard.
> 
> For anyone interested: we always require a signed contract with strict 
> rules about how our artifacts can/can't be used by renters. In the past 
> few years we did most of the computers for "The Americans", "Halt & 
> Catch Fire", Apple/MSFT episode of "American Genius", and a major 
> Hollywood film that I can't reveal, along with several smaller deals. In 
> each case, the contract requires proof of their insurance; numerous 
> rules about transportation, storage, and (of course) actual usage; and 
> additional rules requiring MARCH delegates to on-site if anything needs 
> to be up and running. Everything from wrapping to power to proximity of 
> any open beverages is covered. Related: there are some artifacts we 
> won't rent at any price due to value/rarity/size/etc.
  

Re: Wanted: IBM AS/400 in NY for a film

2015-07-30 Thread Pontus Pihlgren
I think it was someone on this list who told the story of some 
antique furniture that was rented out with a ridicoulously high 
deposit and got it back with bullet holes. Apparently the 
deposit wasn't ridiculous enough with respect to the overall 
budget of the film.

Evan: it would be interesting to read your contract. I've loaned 
an IBM 5150 once with a contract I scribbled up myself.

the result: https://youtu.be/Zfcm2JL4Lnk

(spot the technical error)

/P

On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 07:28:44AM -0700, dwight wrote:
> I'd think a ridiculously high deposit alone with the contract
> would ensure proper use.
> Simply state if it is damaged in any way, they keep the computer
> and you keep the deposit.
> I've done similar in the past and always got things back.
> Dwight
> 
>  
> > Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 07:08:59 -0400
> > From: e...@snarc.net
> > To: gene...@classiccmp.org; classiccmp.org:On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts 
> > cctalk@classiccmp.org
> > Subject: Re: Wanted: IBM AS/400 in NY for a film
> > 
> > 
> > >> I received this email - they want am IBM AS/400 for a film - it 
> > >> doesn't have to work. They will pay for transportation and rent. Near 
> > >> Brooklyn NY I think.
> > >
> > > And what will they pay for damage or destruction?
> > 
> > MARCH is working on this deal, since metro NYC is our backyard.
> > 
> > For anyone interested: we always require a signed contract with strict 
> > rules about how our artifacts can/can't be used by renters. In the past 
> > few years we did most of the computers for "The Americans", "Halt & 
> > Catch Fire", Apple/MSFT episode of "American Genius", and a major 
> > Hollywood film that I can't reveal, along with several smaller deals. In 
> > each case, the contract requires proof of their insurance; numerous 
> > rules about transportation, storage, and (of course) actual usage; and 
> > additional rules requiring MARCH delegates to on-site if anything needs 
> > to be up and running. Everything from wrapping to power to proximity of 
> > any open beverages is covered. Related: there are some artifacts we 
> > won't rent at any price due to value/rarity/size/etc.
> 


Re: Wanted: IBM AS/400 in NY for a film

2015-07-30 Thread Fred Cisin

On Thu, 30 Jul 2015, Pontus Pihlgren wrote:

I think it was someone on this list who told the story of some
antique furniture that was rented out with a ridicoulously high
deposit and got it back with bullet holes. Apparently the
deposit wasn't ridiculous enough with respect to the overall
budget of the film.


Actually, that problem is more likely to be lack of communication and not 
giving a shit.  The people making decisions at the time of filming 
("here's what we need to do") might not even know how much the deposit 
was (nor care).  The high deposit might convey the need for care to the
people renting it, but that doesn't get through to OTHER people who are 
the ones ending up using it.


Hence, set a deposit that is an amount that you would be glad to sell the 
item for, and NEVER loan out something that you would not want to part 
with.





Re: Wanted: IBM AS/400 in NY for a film

2015-07-30 Thread Noel Chiappa
> From: Evan Koblentz

> we always require a signed contract with strict rules about how our
> artifacts can/can't be used by renters.

I hope the contract includes a very sizeable 'liquidated damages' clause
which comes into force when the artifact is significantly damaged (i.e.
scraped paint, scratches, etc don't count) or destroyed; that number should
be 5-10 times its assessed value.

That would be to stop people like the film crew we heard of who borrowed
something, deliberately destroyed it as part of a scene, and them calmly paid
the lender the assessed value. If they're looking at having to pay a _ton_ of
money if they pull that stunt, they're less likely to.

Noel


Re: Wanted: IBM AS/400 in NY for a film

2015-07-30 Thread Fred Cisin

On Thu, 30 Jul 2015, Noel Chiappa wrote:

That would be to stop people like the film crew we heard of who borrowed
something, deliberately destroyed it as part of a scene, and them calmly paid
the lender the assessed value. If they're looking at having to pay a _ton_ of
money if they pull that stunt, they're less likely to.


You are assuming that there will be somebody ON SET from accounting to 
point out the cost.





RE: Wanted: IBM AS/400 in NY for a film

2015-07-30 Thread tony duell
> 
> I hope the contract includes a very sizeable 'liquidated damages' clause
> which comes into force when the artifact is significantly damaged (i.e.
> scraped paint, scratches, etc don't count) or destroyed; that number should
> be 5-10 times its assessed value.
> 
> That would be to stop people like the film crew we heard of who borrowed
> something, deliberately destroyed it as part of a scene, and them calmly paid
> the lender the assessed value. If they're looking at having to pay a _ton_ of
> money if they pull that stunt, they're less likely to.

As others have said, that 'liquidated damges' amount may be lost in the noise 
compared to the total budget for the film. So be careful. Be very careful.

And no matter what the amount is, remember you can't hack banknotes. If it's
a rare machine, one you have spent a long time tracking down, etc, then the
money is probably worth a lot less to you. There are items in my collection that
I would not lend out even if the amount was say $10million. Period.

-tony


A Final Word

2015-07-30 Thread Steven Landon

This is my final word

I was recently banned from #classiccmp for selling a machine that was my 
own,  I picked it up for someone else who hadnt paid me for it,  sat in 
my closet for a year now.  Hadnt heard from that person,  tried 
contacting them,  to no avail,  I listed it on ebay the other day,  only 
to wake up to find that I had been banned from #classiccmp for listing 
that machine.   As far as I know its not against the rules to sell my 
own personal property.  I was finally able to get a hold of the person 
who wanted it and he still does.  I am currently arranging a way for him 
to get it.



 I know many of you hate me because im this horrible evil scammer 
pedophile,  or thats what you think.  Common sense says that if I was a 
horrible pedophile,  I wouldnt have joint custody of my son, But I do.   
Because of what was posted online over the years. Yes I scammed over 10 
years ago,  thats in the past,  Im not a bad person nor a pedophile. 
People do change you know.   Im a hardworking person who tries his 
hardest to take care of his kid and family.Yes I enjoy computers.. I 
enjoy fixing them up and finding them homes.


I've been treated terrible in this scene by a number of people. calling 
me names,  you name it.   I attended VCF 3 years in a row, Had a 
blast. This year I will not be attending due to the sheer number of 
threats I have received.   I really wanted to bring my son this year.  
Hes 10.  It would have been fun to share this with him. We really wanted 
to have a ccmp display during the 2016 Telephone show here in Michigan 
as well,  and you all would have been welcome to come.



But if you guy's don't want me in this scene just simply say so, and Ill 
quietly disappear.




Thank you for your time and Good Day




Re: A Final Word

2015-07-30 Thread Mouse
Okay, it's a little OT.

I've never interacted directly with slandon110 and quite possibly never
will.  But I do have one remark in response to

> Yes I scammed over 10 years ago, thats in the past,

It is good that there are people who are willing to forgive and forget,
because that gives bad actors an incentive to reform.

But it also good that there are people who aren't, because that gives
not-yet-bad actors an incentive to never start.

(Not, of course, that that is to condone the threats slandon110 has
received - or says he has, at least, and I'm willing to treat the claim
as true for purposes of this email.  Unwillingness to forgive and
forget is a very long step from issuing threats against someone
putatively showing up at a hobby event.)

/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
 X  Against HTMLmo...@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email!   7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39  4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B


Re: A Final Word

2015-07-30 Thread Todd Goodman
* Steven Landon  [150730 13:59]:
> This is my final word
> 
> I was recently banned from #classiccmp for selling a machine that was my 
> own,  I picked it up for someone else who hadnt paid me for it,  sat in 
> my closet for a year now.  Hadnt heard from that person,  tried 
> contacting them,  to no avail,  I listed it on ebay the other day,  only 
> to wake up to find that I had been banned from #classiccmp for listing 
> that machine.   As far as I know its not against the rules to sell my 
> own personal property.  I was finally able to get a hold of the person 
> who wanted it and he still does.  I am currently arranging a way for him 
> to get it.
> 
> 
>   I know many of you hate me because im this horrible evil scammer 
> pedophile,  or thats what you think.  Common sense says that if I was a 
> horrible pedophile,  I wouldnt have joint custody of my son, But I do.   
> Because of what was posted online over the years. Yes I scammed over 10 
> years ago,  thats in the past,  Im not a bad person nor a pedophile. 
> People do change you know.   Im a hardworking person who tries his 
> hardest to take care of his kid and family.Yes I enjoy computers.. I 
> enjoy fixing them up and finding them homes.
> 
> I've been treated terrible in this scene by a number of people. calling 
> me names,  you name it.   I attended VCF 3 years in a row, Had a 
> blast. This year I will not be attending due to the sheer number of 
> threats I have received.   I really wanted to bring my son this year.  
> Hes 10.  It would have been fun to share this with him. We really wanted 
> to have a ccmp display during the 2016 Telephone show here in Michigan 
> as well,  and you all would have been welcome to come.
> 
> 
> But if you guy's don't want me in this scene just simply say so, and Ill 
> quietly disappear.
> 
> 
> 
> Thank you for your time and Good Day

I've never read or heard anyone call you a "horrible evil scammer
pedophile."  Nor have I heard any threats made against you (and
certainly not your son.)

But you're certainly a thief.  Many consider depriving people of their
hard earned money as horrible and evil.

It has not been ten years since you scammed people as you promised to
refund the rest of the money owed to me after last years VCFMW and you
never did so.

I was due the money because you took money from me for shipping and then
never shipped the items and didn't refund the money.  Your whole
solution was that I could drive hundeds of miles to pick up items I had
already paid you to ship (with you keeping the shipping money as well.)

These are all facts.  No name calling.

Personally I had thought you were trying to turn over a new leaf, but
that wasn't the case.  I doubt you are now either.  You're certainly not
the poor martyred saint you're trying to make yourself out to be.

I've had great luck dealing with people in my hobbies including vintage
computing.  Almost all are trustworthy and act as members of the
collecting community.

You do not and the community would be better if you were to "quietly
disappear."

You've made your bed by your admitted scamming people ten years ago (and
by the facts which show you're still at it.)

Todd


RE: A Final Word (FINAL)

2015-07-30 Thread Jay West
One thing I will absolutely not abide here is drama of any kind. Regardless
of anyone's sentiments in response to his post one way or the other, the
list is no place for that. 

Suffice it to say, his subject line was correct. That was the final word
he'll ever get on this list, and I have made his ban on freenode:
#classiccmp permanent as well.

For the record, my reasoning for the ban has more to do with other issues of
his - not just the ones commonly posted here and on other forums.

Please kill this thread, the last thing we need is a low SNR.

Best,

J








PDP-1 in Verilog (Incomplete) + More

2015-07-30 Thread Jan Adelsbach

Hi all,

At the time I've released my DG NOVA in Verilog I was also working on a 
PDP-1 in Verilog. Since I haven't
touched the thing for quite some time I've decided to just release it 
before it catches dust. So far it can
execute all kinds of programs, limitation is that they may not use IO as 
I haven't implemented the latter yet. (So essentially the same state as 
my DG NOVA implementation)
It also supports optionally some PDP-1D features in the OPR and SKP 
instruction groups. Interrupts are implemented but untested. I'm not 
sure in which state I left the IOT controller if it works then both SBS 
and SBS16 might be usable.

TL;DR: https://github.com/Jside/pdp1

The RCA110 was the project I was working on before I started the DG 
NOVA, it can execute some instructions but there is to much ambiguity in 
the reference manual on bitsavers in some cases which led
me to abandon it. Especially since there is no software to cross-check. 
So for reference you can get it here:

https://github.com/Jside/rca110

I wanted to mess around a bit with Chisel (a new HDL language used by 
the RISCV project) so here
is the start of a CDC160 (currently only the instruction decoder): 
https://github.com/Jside/cdc160


I've also uploaded my DG NOVA to Github: https://github.com/Jside/nova1

MC14500B anyone? http://janadelsbach.com/soft/mc14500b.tar

I will occasionally continue working on both the NOVA and PDP-1 (and 
maybe CDC160?). Also pull requests are welcome.
As is obvious I *really* like implementing old computers in HDL 
languages but I always get stuck
around IO since for any kind of flexibility as with an emulator I 
essentially would need to write a bus wrapper so that a (soft-core) 
processor executing Linux running an IO server could handle i.e. hard 
disks and magnetic tapes and that's I think really not worth it. So I 
might just go over and contribute to an emulator/simulator like SIMH if 
I'm in an must-implement-an-old-computer/processor mood ;).


Regards,
Jan


Re: FFS: GE Mark Century programming manual

2015-07-30 Thread Jason T
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 3:30 AM, jwsmobile  wrote:
> First, thanks much, interesting to add to my collection.
>
> Second, the early letter from Mr. Thomas Software Coordinator, "Please use a
> stick and a mallet to open this book".  Died laughing.  Way too early to
> have that sort of sense of humor.

It's a helluva contraption in the binding - a metal slide that catches
the tops of the binding pegs and little metal nubs on the inside of
the front cover.  I pried it forward with a screwdriver to open it and
tapped it closed with the handle.  Not to spec but effective enough.

Get a load of the cost, too - $42 for a manual in 1970!

(So does anyone want this thing?)

j


Re: Equipment available (Wichita, Ks)

2015-07-30 Thread Jerome H. Fine

>Sean Caron wrote:


Hi Shaun,

Can you estimate weight on the SHD1Z-ZZ? That's all DEC RZ26 drives in
there? I can't seem to find a picture so I'm not clear on dimensions or
weight ... Someone already claim it?


I am holding a DEC RZ28 (aka ST32550N) 2 GB
hard drive in my hands and it seems no different in
weight than any other 3.5" hard drive.  As a rough
estimate, take any Seagate 3.5" hard drive as being
close to the RZ26.  Does this help?

Jerome Fine


Re: DEC M705 vs M7050 in PC05

2015-07-30 Thread Jörg Hoppe



Hi,

If you were following Joerg Hoppe's recent PC05 auction on eBay, you might have 
noticed that his system had an M705 in the backplane where I would have 
expected an M7050. This is the way he received it and the restored unit works 
as it should.

Clearly the cards are similar but different but are they interchangeable? Would 
the backplane wiring be different and if so where would this be recorded?

My copy of the PC04/05 maintenance manual (DEC-00-PCOA-D(1)) makes no mention 
of the M705 in this location. The PC04/05 print set on Bitsavers has the M705 
on the module utilization list (p45) but crossed out with no reference notes. 
There is an ECO list on the sheet, showing PC05 ECO's 3, 16 and 30 but no 
specifics. Is there an available ECO log that would cover these notes?

Then there's the K303, but that's another story...


While repairing I found these functional differences between M705- and 
M7050-based PC05's:

http://retrocmp.com/stories/dec-pc05-papertape/240-dec-pc05-model-evolution

Differences are the generation of the reader's data clock signal 
(Stepper motor position vs. feed hole pulse) and the "end of tape" 
condition" (tape photo cell vs. feed hole timeout).


Joerg


Re: Equipment available (Wichita, Ks)

2015-07-30 Thread Shaun Halstead


On 07/30/2015 03:18 PM, Jerome H. Fine wrote:
> I am holding a DEC RZ28 (aka ST32550N) 2 GB
> hard drive in my hands and it seems no different in
> weight than any other 3.5" hard drive.  As a rough
> estimate, take any Seagate 3.5" hard drive as being
> close to the RZ26.  Does this help?


  I replied to Sean off list.  The complete array weighs about 25 pounds, with 
power supply and 6
disks.  I've had a couple of inquiries about it already.

--Shaun



AM Varityper (phototypesetter)

2015-07-30 Thread Chuck Guzis
I don't know how many of you were familiar with the 
Addressograph-Multigraph (AM) Varityper phototypesetting systems. 
Basically small computers with floppy drives and a (very nice) 
terminal--and a big box that held quite a number of photo "font" disks. 
 Basically worked by shining a light through a specific disk and 
character onto light-sensitive paper.   Produced gorgeous print ready 
copy.  Compugraphic and Mergenthaler had similar systems and I think 
there were also several other competitors as well.


At any rate, a pile of 8" HS floppies will be landing here in the near 
future.  Does anyone have any leads on Varityper service manuals or 
anything might help me with the task of figuring out what on the disks? 
(The disks themselves do not come from a country that uses the Latin 
alphabet).


Thanks for any leads...


--Chuck
-

"The first thing we do, let's kill all the spammers."



RE: PDP-1 in Verilog (Incomplete) + More

2015-07-30 Thread Kip Koon
Hi Jay, 
I don't know if you are into Motorola microcontrollers or not, but I'm looking 
for an IP core for the MC68HC11K Microcontroller as I can't find the actual 
chip on ebay.  Would you be interested in implementing this microcontroller in 
VHDL?  I'm trying to learn VHDL, but my many projects keep wanting my time.  :) 
 I believe there is plenty of reference material for you to use.  I've 
collected some documentation myself that I would be happy to share if need be.  
Please let me know what you think.  Take care my friend.

Kip Koon
computer...@sc.rr.com
http://www.cocopedia.com/wiki/index.php/Kip_Koon



> -Original Message-
> From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Jan Adelsbach
> Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2015 3:32 PM
> To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
> Subject: PDP-1 in Verilog (Incomplete) + More
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> At the time I've released my DG NOVA in Verilog I was also working on a
> PDP-1 in Verilog. Since I haven't
> touched the thing for quite some time I've decided to just release it before 
> it catches dust. So far it can execute all kinds of programs,
> limitation is that they may not use IO as I haven't implemented the latter 
> yet. (So essentially the same state as my DG NOVA
> implementation) It also supports optionally some PDP-1D features in the OPR 
> and SKP instruction groups. Interrupts are implemented
> but untested. I'm not sure in which state I left the IOT controller if it 
> works then both SBS and SBS16 might be usable.
> TL;DR: https://github.com/Jside/pdp1
> 
> The RCA110 was the project I was working on before I started the DG NOVA, it 
> can execute some instructions but there is to much
> ambiguity in the reference manual on bitsavers in some cases which led me to 
> abandon it. Especially since there is no software to
> cross-check.
> So for reference you can get it here:
> https://github.com/Jside/rca110
> 
> I wanted to mess around a bit with Chisel (a new HDL language used by the 
> RISCV project) so here is the start of a CDC160 (currently
> only the instruction decoder):
> https://github.com/Jside/cdc160
> 
> I've also uploaded my DG NOVA to Github: https://github.com/Jside/nova1
> 
> MC14500B anyone? http://janadelsbach.com/soft/mc14500b.tar
> 
> I will occasionally continue working on both the NOVA and PDP-1 (and maybe 
> CDC160?). Also pull requests are welcome.
> As is obvious I *really* like implementing old computers in HDL languages but 
> I always get stuck around IO since for any kind of
> flexibility as with an emulator I essentially would need to write a bus 
> wrapper so that a (soft-core) processor executing Linux running
> an IO server could handle i.e. hard disks and magnetic tapes and that's I 
> think really not worth it. So I might just go over and contribute
> to an emulator/simulator like SIMH if I'm in an 
> must-implement-an-old-computer/processor mood ;).
> 
> Regards,
> Jan



Re: AM Varityper (phototypesetter)

2015-07-30 Thread Mark Linimon
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 07:02:35PM -0700, Chuck Guzis wrote:
> I don't know how many of you were familiar with the Addressograph-
> Multigraph (AM) Varityper phototypesetting systems.

If you're talking about the 8008(sic)-based unit which had the "developer"
unit contained within it ... you're giving me a nervous tic.

If for some reason of insanity you want to run this thing, you *must*
keep it well-cooled.  Otherwise the font disks spin ... too slowly.

At the university newspaper we would keep the classified ads that it
mis-typset and run them every April 1.  The best was the ad for the
"1876 Volkswagen Qabbit with automatic sransmisrion".  Thankfully I
have forgotten the others.

And yes, if it messed up, you got to retype all those column inches
all over again.

mcl


Re: AM Varityper (phototypesetter)

2015-07-30 Thread Chuck Guzis

On 07/30/2015 07:07 PM, Mark Linimon wrote:


If you're talking about the 8008(sic)-based unit which had the
"developer" unit contained within it ... you're giving me a nervous
tic.

If for some reason of insanity you want to run this thing, you
*must* keep it well-cooled.  Otherwise the font disks spin ... too
slowly.



Basically, this thing, or a variation thereof:

http://www.ricomputermuseum.org/Home/equipment/varityper

Probably, given the time, 8080/z80 or 8085, I would guess.

I don't have the unit, just the floppies.

--Chuck


RE: PDP-1 in Verilog (Incomplete) + More

2015-07-30 Thread Jay jaeger
Sorry, not interested.  My next project of that sort is for the IBM 1410.

Kip Koon  wrote:

>Hi Jay, 
>I don't know if you are into Motorola microcontrollers or not, but I'm looking 
>for an IP core for the MC68HC11K Microcontroller as I can't find the actual 
>chip on ebay.  Would you be interested in implementing this microcontroller in 
>VHDL?  I'm trying to learn VHDL, but my many projects keep wanting my time.  
>:)  I believe there is plenty of reference material for you to use.  I've 
>collected some documentation myself that I would be happy to share if need be. 
> Please let me know what you think.  Take care my friend.
>
>Kip Koon
>computer...@sc.rr.com
>http://www.cocopedia.com/wiki/index.php/Kip_Koon
>
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Jan 
>> Adelsbach
>> Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2015 3:32 PM
>> To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
>> Subject: PDP-1 in Verilog (Incomplete) + More
>> 
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> At the time I've released my DG NOVA in Verilog I was also working on a
>> PDP-1 in Verilog. Since I haven't
>> touched the thing for quite some time I've decided to just release it before 
>> it catches dust. So far it can execute all kinds of programs,
>> limitation is that they may not use IO as I haven't implemented the latter 
>> yet. (So essentially the same state as my DG NOVA
>> implementation) It also supports optionally some PDP-1D features in the OPR 
>> and SKP instruction groups. Interrupts are implemented
>> but untested. I'm not sure in which state I left the IOT controller if it 
>> works then both SBS and SBS16 might be usable.
>> TL;DR: https://github.com/Jside/pdp1
>> 
>> The RCA110 was the project I was working on before I started the DG NOVA, it 
>> can execute some instructions but there is to much
>> ambiguity in the reference manual on bitsavers in some cases which led me to 
>> abandon it. Especially since there is no software to
>> cross-check.
>> So for reference you can get it here:
>> https://github.com/Jside/rca110
>> 
>> I wanted to mess around a bit with Chisel (a new HDL language used by the 
>> RISCV project) so here is the start of a CDC160 (currently
>> only the instruction decoder):
>> https://github.com/Jside/cdc160
>> 
>> I've also uploaded my DG NOVA to Github: https://github.com/Jside/nova1
>> 
>> MC14500B anyone? http://janadelsbach.com/soft/mc14500b.tar
>> 
>> I will occasionally continue working on both the NOVA and PDP-1 (and maybe 
>> CDC160?). Also pull requests are welcome.
>> As is obvious I *really* like implementing old computers in HDL languages 
>> but I always get stuck around IO since for any kind of
>> flexibility as with an emulator I essentially would need to write a bus 
>> wrapper so that a (soft-core) processor executing Linux running
>> an IO server could handle i.e. hard disks and magnetic tapes and that's I 
>> think really not worth it. So I might just go over and contribute
>> to an emulator/simulator like SIMH if I'm in an 
>> must-implement-an-old-computer/processor mood ;).
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Jan
>