Re: periodic ADSM/TSM shutdown
In my "little" NT world periodocally means once a year, during upgrade times. Maybe to often for our AIX friends out there, and to you? //Henrik From: Reinhold Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 2000-10-13 07:53 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: (bcc: Henrik Wahlstedt) Subject: Re: periodic ADSM/TSM shutdown That's why we run ADSM on AIX instead of NT: so we don't need periodically recycle the machine. Reinhold Wagner, Zeuna Staerker GmbH & Co. KG --- Statoil: The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.
Re: Restoring Client to Client Data
Hi, Try on Node C, 'dsmc -nodename=Node B' or 'dsmc -virtualnodename=Node B'. Also look at 'help' concerning this subject //Henrik "Al'shaebani, Bassam" cc: Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Subject: Restoring Client to Client Data Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2002-05-22 14:40 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" Good Morning All, I need to restore data from one of my clients into another (bypassing the server) ie. TSM server is node A, I have a file on Node B that I need restored on Node C. Can anyone help? Thanks in advance! --- The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.
Expire data on a server that doesnt exist any longer.
Hello ! If I have backup of a server which is out of production. What can I do and how, if I want to expire all extra backup copies (versions data exist) except the last backup (versions data deleted)? I can change mgmtclass but I still have to do a backup to rebind my files. If I use a client and log on with 'dsmc -virtualnodename=xyz' and exclude E:\...\* , what happens then? Will it expire xyz´s E:\ files or the client node E:\ files? tia Henrik --- The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.
Expire data on a server that doesnt exist any longer.
Hello ! If I have backup of a server which is out of production. What can I do and how, if I want to expire all extra backup copies (versions data exist) except the last backup (versions data deleted)? I can change mgmtclass but I still have to do a backup to rebind my files. If I use a client and log on with 'dsmc -virtualnodename=xyz' and exclude E:\...\* , what happens then? Will it expire xyz´s E:\ files or the client node E:\ files? tia Henrik --- The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.
Re: Expire data on a server that doesnt exist any longer.
Thanks for your answers. It seems like I miss something here. I copied the domain and updated/validated/activated the policy set and updated the node. When I do a 'dsmc incr' with a modified dsm.opt (NodeName xyz and Exclude E:\...\*) on a different node, STO-LN02, I only backup STO-LN02´s filespace and doesn´t trim out my extra versions on xyz. If I do a 'q fi xyz' it looks like this: tsm: STO-W03>q fi xyz Node Name Filespace Platform Filespace Capacity Pct Name Type (MB) Util -- --- - - xyz \\xyz\c$ WinNTNTFS 4,044.1 60.9 xyz \\xyz\e$ WinNTNTFS 42,385.0 68.8 xyz \\sto-ln02\e$ WinNTNTFS 34,719.8 29.8 tsm: STO-W03> What can I and should do to trim out xyz´s extra versions? rgs Henrik Zlatko Krastev To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Expire data on a server that doesnt exist any longer. Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] RIST.EDU> 2002-07-12 00:48 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" then after expiration takes place update the node back to original domain and delete the copy. Zlatko Krastev IT Consultant Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by:"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: Expire data on a server that doesnt exist any longer. To trim out the extra versions, I would copy the domain the node is now in to a new domain. Update the copygroups to these values - verexists 1 verdeleted 1 retextra 0 retonly Activate the poilcyset and then update the node to be in the new domain. The next expiration will trim all the inactive versions except for the last version of a deleted file. Hope this helps, Bill At 10:17 AM 7/11/2002, you wrote: >> If I have backup of a server which is out of production. What can I do and >> how, if I want to expire all extra backup copies (versions data exist) >> except the last backup (versions data deleted)? >> I can change mgmtclass but I still have to do a backup to rebind my files. >> If I use a client and log on with 'dsmc -virtualnodename=xyz' and exclude >> E:\...\* , what happens then? Will it expire xyz´s E:\ files or the client >> node E:\ files? > >A dsmc command as such won't affect file retentions at all. You will need >to run an incremental backup. > >A 'dsmc inc' with the exclude statement and virtualnodename option shown >would affect files from xyz. However, that approach would make me very >nervous about the possibility of an incremental backup with the exclude >statement but not the option. I would be inclined to copy the options >file, put the special exclude statement and a 'nodename xyz' statement in >the copy, and run dsmc with an 'optfile' option telling it to use the >copy. > >It is easier to describe the effect of a backup that excludes everythin
Re: Expire data on a server that doesnt exist any longer.
Hi, What I´m trying to do is to get rid of xyz´s extra version since that is a node that doesnt exist anymore. And let the node expire away. I dont want to delete the filespace. //Henrik Daniel Sparrman cc: (bcc: Henrik Wahlstedt) Sent by: "ADSM: Subject: Re: Expire data on a server that doesnt exist any longer. Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] T.EDU> 2002-07-18 11:18 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" Hi The q fi xyz doesn't show data stored on the backupserver, only the filespaces, and how much each filespace is utilized. Try running a q occ xyz, this will show you how much space each filespace (sto-ln02\e$, xyz\c$ and xyz\e$) takes up on the backupserver. The table you're showing below, doesn't show how many versions, or how much data you have in your backupsystem. Best Regards Daniel Sparrman --- Daniel Sparrman Exist i Stockholm AB Propellervägen 6B 183 62 HÄGERNÄS Växel: 08 - 754 98 00 Mobil: 070 - 399 27 51 Henrik Wahlstedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2002-07-18 11:05 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: Expire data on a server that doesnt exist any longer. Thanks for your answers. It seems like I miss something here. I copied the domain and updated/validated/activated the policy set and updated the node. When I do a 'dsmc incr' with a modified dsm.opt (NodeName xyz and Exclude E:\...\*) on a different node, STO-LN02, I only backup STO-LN02´s filespace and doesn´t trim out my extra versions on xyz. If I do a 'q fi xyz' it looks like this: tsm: STO-W03>q fi xyz Node Name Filespace Platform Filespace Capacity Pct Name Type (MB) Util -- --- - - xyz \\xyz\c$ WinNTNTFS 4,044.1 60.9 xyz \\xyz\e$ WinNTNTFS 42,385.0 68.8 xyz \\sto-ln02\e$ WinNTNTFS 34,719.8 29.8 tsm: STO-W03> What can I and should do to trim out xyz´s extra versions? rgs Henrik Zlatko Krastev To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Expire data on a server that doesnt exist any longer. Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] RIST.EDU> 2002-07-12 00:48 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" then after expiration takes place update the node back to original domain and delete the copy. Zlatko Krastev IT Consultant Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by:"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: Expire data on a server that doesnt exist any longer. To trim out the extra versions, I would copy the doma
missing volumes
Hello, I would like to know how to compare volume names in volumes and libvolumes with a select statement. Or if there are other ways to determine missing volumes? I use 4.1.3.0. ex. I dont use DRM but I send my volumes offsite and update their access to offsite. I bring back my volumes onsite, I do a checkin and an 'upd vol * access=readw wherestg=copypool whereaccess=offsite wherestatus=empty'. If the volumes arent checked in the library or by some reason still are offsite when they are updated I will miss/need them sooner or later... How do I find eventually missing volumes? Dont suggest using DRM, I will if there is a need for that product (server to server). tia \\Henrik --- The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.
Re: missing volumes
I do, but if I for some reason only get 9 of 10 volumes back where access=offsite and status=empty, and I did not notice that one is missing. Following will happen after I checked in my 9 volumes and vol 000146 is not checked in. After a time, how would I know that my missing volume is vol 000146? tsm: STO-W03>q vol st=emp Volume Name Storage Device EstimatedPct Volume Pool NameClass Name Capacity Util Status (MB) --- -- - - 000146COPYPOOL DLTCLASS 0.00.0 Empty tsm: STO-W03>upd vol 000146 access=readw wherestg=copypool whereaccess=offsite w herestatus=empty ANR2208I Volume 000146 deleted from storage pool COPYPOOL. tsm: STO-W03>q vol 000146 ANR2034E QUERY VOLUME: No match found using this criteria. ANS8001I Return code 11. tsm: STO-W03>q libv stk9710 000146 ANR2034E QUERY LIBVOLUME: No match found using this criteria. ANS8001I Return code 11. //Henrik GUILLAUMONT Etienne cc: (bcc: Henrik Wahlstedt) Sent by: "ADSM:Subject: Re: missing volumes Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] DU> 2002-08-29 14:01 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" Why don't you just check the volumes whose access is offsite and whose status is empty ? This is what I do. And to be sure that all volumes present in library are in an readwrite status, I just put all the volumes of the copypool in offsite state and then all the volumes of the libvol in readwrite state. For that, I use a Shell script which is below. The only thing which is special is that I only have private volumes and all the volumes of my copy pool have a name starting with 'COP' But I guess it wouldn't be very difficult to make a check on the libvol volumes to select the ones which belong to the copy pool #!/bin/ksh LIBVOLS=$(dsmadmc -id=admin -pa=admin "select volume_name from libvolumes where volume_name like 'C%'" | grep COP) TOTVOLS=$(dsmadmc -id=admin -pa=admin "select volume_name from volumes where volume_name like 'C%'" | grep COP) for VOL in $TOTVOLS do dsmadmc -id=admin -pa=admin "upd vol $VOL acc=offsite" done for VOL in $LIBVOLS do dsmadmc -id=admin -pa=admin "upd vol $VOL acc=readw" done Etienne GUILLAUMONT e-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] RGB Technologie Parc d'Innovation, Batiment PYTHAGORE 11 Rue Jean SAPIDUS 67400 ILLKIRCH Tél : 03 90 40 60 60 Fax : 03 90 40 60 61 Henrik WahlstedtTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: missing volumes Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] RIST.EDU> 29/08/02 12:45 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" Hello, I would like to know how to compare volume names in volumes and libvolumes with a select statement. Or if there are other ways to determine missing volumes? I
Re: TDP for Domino ACD5704E error
Just a thought, wasnt an earlier discusson thread mentioning that diskpool should have some sort of RAID since we are responsible of all backed up data. No matter of performance issues... //Henrik Del Hoobler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] BM.COM> cc: (bcc: Henrik Wahlstedt) Sent by: Subject: Re: TDP for Domino ACD5704E error "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] RIST.EDU> 2002-08-30 20:01 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" > A while back we had a disk failure on our TSM server and lost some > transactionlog files from a TDP backup. We now have have a hole in our > restore window because the server can't find one of the logs that was > lost. > > Is there any way around this problem? I would guess not, but it's worth a > try. Marc, You will be able to restore data up to that "hole". Use the point in time option on the activate applylogs step. Just like any transaction log architecture, for any transaction to be applied, it requires transactions prior to it be applied. If you had a backup of the TSM Server, you could restore it and get back your data that lost. Without obtaining the lost data, any data in transaction logs AFTER the transaction log that was lost is useless. Thanks, Del Del Hoobler IBM Corporation [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Never cut what can be untied. - Commit yourself to constant improvement. --- The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.
select statement
Hi ! What can I write after DESC if I just want to see my first 10 volumes? 'select volume_name,read_errors + write_errors as error,access from volumes order by error desc' regards Henrik --- The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.
Re: Searchable archive offline?
Nope, I can search it.//Henrik |+-> || "Denzel, Richard van" | || | || Sent by: "ADSM: Dist | || Stor Manager" | || <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | || | || | || 2002-02-13 15:06 | || Please respond to | || "ADSM: Dist Stor | || Manager" | || | |+-> >| || | To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | cc: (bcc: Henrik Wahlstedt) | | Subject: Searchable archive offline? | >| Does anyone know if the searchable archive at http://www.adsm.org is offline? I myself can't reach it. Richard. - Richard van Denzel High Availability & Storage Solutions Senior Technical Consultant Infrastructure Consulting & Integration [EMAIL PROTECTED] Getronics Infrastructure Solutions Wiltonstraat 42 Postbus 1005 3900 BA Veenendaal tel.: 0318 - 567 100 fax: 0318 - 567 633 mobiel: 06 - 212 78 569 Building Futures on <<http://www.getronics.com/>> --- Statoil: The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.
Re: question: db-backup
Hey, As you write 'To backup the db the application which uses the db has to be down. ' answers your question. No. Aren´t you having a networkproblem with speed less than 0,5Gb/hour? //Henrik |+-> || "Stumpf, | || Joachim" | || | || Sent by: "ADSM:| || Dist Stor | || Manager" | || <[EMAIL PROTECTED]| || ST.EDU>| || | || | || 2002-03-20 | || 10:45 | || Please respond | || to "ADSM: Dist | || Stor Manager" | || | |+-> >| || | To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | cc: (bcc: Henrik Wahlstedt) | | Subject: question: db-backup | >| Hi together, We have a database to backup with TSM. This db is 2GB and the backup takes 5 hours. To backup the db the application which uses the db has to be down. Is it possible to start the application during the db-backup? -- regards / Mit freundlichen Gruessen Joachim Stumpf Datev eG Nuremberg - Germany --- Statoil: The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.
Re: question: db-backup
Hi again Joachim, Yes you will receive 'file in use' message. What kind of database are you talking about and is it a online backup you are doing? You can try to change mode on the database during backup (but I´m not sure it will help) or make a database export and backup the exported copy. //Henrik |+-> || "Stumpf, | || Joachim" | || | || Sent by: "ADSM:| || Dist Stor | || Manager" | || <[EMAIL PROTECTED]| || ST.EDU>| || | || | || 2002-03-20 | || 11:30 | || Please respond | || to "ADSM: Dist | || Stor Manager" | || | |+-> >| || | To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | cc: (bcc: Henrik Wahlstedt) | | Subject: Re: question: db-backup | >| Hi Henrik, thanks for your answer. But if we start the backup while application has the db allocated, we usually should get the "file in use"-message. Or not? At the moment we are testing the OSA-Gigabit-Adapter to backup our Nodes ;) Then the problem with the network should be solved... -- regards / Mit freundlichen Gruessen Joachim Stumpf Datev eG Nuremberg - Germany Henrik Wahlstedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Mittwoch, 20. März 2002, 11:13:35, CET): > > > > Hey, > As you write 'To backup the db the application which uses the db has to be down. > ' answers your question. No. > Aren´t you having a networkproblem with speed less than 0,5Gb/hour? > > //Henrik > > > |+-> > || "Stumpf, | > || Joachim" | > || || @DATEV.DE> | > || Sent by: "ADSM:| > || Dist Stor | > || Manager" | > || <[EMAIL PROTECTED]| > || ST.EDU>| > || | > || | > || 2002-03-20 | > || 10:45 | > || Please respond | > || to "ADSM: Dist | > || Stor Manager" | > || | > |+-> > >| > | | > | To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | > | cc: (bcc: Henrik Wahlstedt) | > | Subject: question: db-backup | > >| > > > > > > > > Hi together, > > We have a database to backup with TSM. This db is 2GB and the backup takes 5 > hours. > To backup the db the application which uses the db has to be down. > > Is it possible to start the application during the db-backup? > > -- > regards / Mit freundlichen Gruessen > Joachim Stumpf > Datev eG > Nuremberg - Germany > > > > --- > Statoil: The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is > intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the > information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the > addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this > message. > Thank you. > --- Statoil: The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.
Volume status
Hi, If I change reusedelay for my tapepool, when will my volume status change for examlpe from pending to empty? What triggers that change? If I lower my recl. threshold, reclaimation doesnt start immediately. What/when make reclamaition to occur (except lowering threshold, expiration)? tia Henrik --- The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.
Re: Backing-Up in Windows 2000 Enviroment (Verificación ScanMail )
I think that TSM cant directly backup registry etc so TSM exports it to C:\ADSM.SYS folder and therefor you exclude c:\winnt\system32\config folder from backup by default. Henrik |+--> || Rafael Elvira Julian| ||| || Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor | || Manager"| || <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | || | || | || 2001-12-10 09:42| || Please respond to "ADSM:| || Dist Stor Manager" | || | |+--> >| || | To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | cc: (bcc: Henrik Wahlstedt) | | Subject: Re: Backing-Up in Windows 2000 Enviroment (Verificación | | ScanMail ) | >| Ok, tahnks But, I have problems to back up the folowing directories : c:\winnt\system32\config\* Somebody have a idea ? Mark Stapleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> con fecha 10/12/2001 05:57:22 Por favor, responda a "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Destinatarios: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: (cci: Rafael Elvira Julian/Sistemas Distribuidos/IT/LineaDirecta) Asunto: Re: Backing-Up in Windows 2000 Enviroment (Verificación ScanMail ) On Mon, 3 Dec 2001 13:35:51 +0100, it was written: > Anyone know what is the procedure to backup system objects in a windows 2000 >enviroment Easy. dsmc backup systemobject -- Mark Stapleton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) --- Statoil: The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.
Audit volume and a restore failure
Hi all! 1. I got the error "ANR8355E I/O error reading label for volume volume name in drive drive name" and ran an "audit vol" on that specific volume as suggested. Then I recieved the error below. Have anyone seen something like this and know what I probably should do to correct it? I run TSM 4.1.3.0 on Win2k. 01/22/2002 11:56:12 ANRD bfaggrut.c(521): SrvId 0, superBfId 0.82069818 contains too many sub-bitfiles. 01/22/2002 11:56:12 ANRD bfrtrv.c(1299): Error 87 getting super-bitfile information. 01/22/2002 11:56:12 ANR2327W Audit volume process terminated for volume 000437 - internal server error detected. 01/22/2002 11:56:12 ANR0987I Process 552 for AUDIT VOLUME (INSPECT ONLY) running in the BACKGROUND processed 6903 items with a completion state of FAILURE at 11:56:12. 2. I tried to restore a Win2k sp2 client (professional) for practice with TSM 4.1.2.12 client. When I tried to restore the registry information I got the error below. I followed the Redbook Deploying TSM in a Win2k Enviroment step by step. 6.5.1 a. Perform a file system restore of the system / boot partition (usually C:drive) b. From the System Object, restore the System Files component. Do not reboot on completion c. From the System Object, restore the registry . Select to activate keys after restore. Do not reboot on completion FAILURE d. From the System Object, restore COM+ database. Do not reboot on completion e. From the System Object, restore RSM database. f. Reboot system into normal mode - restore should be complete Output from dsmerror.log 01/22/2002 10:52:14 TcpFlush: Error 10054 sending data on Tcp/Ip socket 556. 01/22/2002 10:52:14 sessRecvVerb: Error -50 from call to 'readRtn'. 01/22/2002 10:52:14 TcpFlush: Error 10054 sending data on Tcp/Ip socket 556. 01/22/2002 10:59:11 Error replacing registry key: S-1-5-21-1220945662-1606980848-854245398-1000, Windows rc = 87 01/22/2002 10:59:11 Error replacing registry key: S-1-5-21-1220945662-1606980848-854245398-1000_Classes, Windows rc = 87 01/22/2002 10:59:11 ANS5206E An error replacing one or more registry keys 01/22/2002 11:02:14 psPrepareObjectForRestore(): error: 933 from psFileRemoveDirEx(), path=C:\adsm.sys\W2KReg 01/22/2002 11:02:14 ANS1257E Error preparing object for restore. After reboot I had to re-add my machine to the domain again and most things seems to work correctly but doubt it does. Have anyone experienced similar problems while restoring Win2k systems? And what does rc = 87 mean? rgs //Henrik --- The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.
Re: My experience with audit db
Hello, Just pure curiosity, what forced you to do an Audit db? If I had a 3 days service window I would do an Unload db. In the end of the Load db I would be asked to do an Audit db if there was a need for it. //Henrik Schmitz Garnebode cc: (bcc: Henrik Wahlstedt) Sent by: "ADSM: Subject: My experience with audit db Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] EDU> 2003-02-24 08:39 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" Good morning, last weekend i use a 3 day servicewindow to do a audit db on our two tsm-server. Here my experience: Both tsm-server are S7A with 4GB Memory, the TSM-DB stay on SSA Harddisk, Wlb06190: Available Assigned Maximum MaximumPage Total Used Pct Max. Space Capacity Extension ReductionSize Usable Pages Util Pct (MB) (MB) (MB) (MB) (bytes) Pages Util - - - --- - - - - 36.000 36.000 012.040 4.096 9.216.000 6.134.984 66.6 66.6 ANR4306I AUDITDB: Processed 175824258 database entries (cumulative). Start Auditdb 22.02.03 09:23 End Auditdb23.02.03 19:19 34 hours wlb06192: Available Assigned Maximum MaximumPage Total Used Pct Max. Space Capacity Extension ReductionSize Usable Pages Util Pct (MB) (MB) (MB) (MB) (bytes) Pages Util - - - --- - - - - 28.288 22.276 6.012 1.164 4.096 5.702.656 1.999.967 35.1 35.1 ANR4306I AUDITDB: Processed 64775507 database entries (cumulative). Start Auditdb 22.02.03 08:30 Ende Auditdb 22.02.03 19:55 12 hours kind regards Michael Garnebode Diplom-Informatiker Schmitz Rz Consult GmbH Bachstr.1 50259 Pulheim Tel.: 02238/922266 Fax: 02238/922267 EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] im Auftrag der SWEST Sparkassen-Informatik-Services West GmbH Abt. : 731-52400 Spacemanagement Postanschrift : Postfach 10 53 10 D - 40044 Düsseldorf Besuchsadresse : Heerdter Lohweg 35 Raum B0-29 Düsseldorf Tel.: +49 211 826 8896 Fax : +49 211 826 8446 Web: http://www.swest.de --- The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.
dbbackup trigger
Good morning! First of all things.. I use 4.1.3.0 on w2k. Second, I have my log (3GB) in roll forward mode and use a dbbackup trigger which kicks off at log full percentage=40. I belived that an incremental dbbackup would lower my logs pct. utilized, but I might be wrong? After an incremantal dbbackup I get an anr4556. How high must I update my log full percentage to reset log pct.utilization? ANR4556W Attention: the database backup operation did not free sufficient recovery log space to lower utilization below the database backup trigger. The recovery log size may need to be increased. Help 4556, User Response: If a database backup operation does not free up enough recovery log space to reset utilization below the database backup trigger, the recovery log needs to be extended or the database backup trigger updated to a higher log full percentage. --- The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.
Re: TSM vs Veritas?
Another way to look at it can be Veritas vs TSM at Veritas web site. It might not be the right approach, only a way to see the differences two ways... Srinivas Polu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] NET.CO.IN> cc: (bcc: Henrik Wahlstedt) Sent by: "ADSM: Subject: Re: TSM vs Veritas? Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] .EDU> 2003-03-05 07:29 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" Gerald, Pl. find the direct link to TSM Vs Veritas Document, Just click on it, you will go the the document. ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/software/tivoli/analystreports/ar-tsm-comparing-s um.pdf Srinivas Polu Systems Engineer. Tivoli Certified Consultant(TSM) HCL Technologies., NOIDA - INDIA Phone No: 91-0120-4535071 Ext:3376. Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Gerald Wichmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 7:05 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: TSM vs Veritas? I'm looking for a good recent comparison of TSM vs Veritas Netbackup... Appreciate any links/suggestions on where to find a comparison. Thanks, Gerald Wichmann Senior Systems Development Engineer Zantaz, Inc. 925.598.3099 (w) This e-mail has been captured and archived by the ZANTAZ Digital Safe(tm) service. For more information, visit us at www.zantaz.com. IMPORTANT: This electronic mail message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone or directly reply to the original message(s) sent. Thank you. --- The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.
Re: Poor TSM Performances
It looks like the NIC settings arent 100/full duplex om both systems and switch. How did you calculate 5,84GB/Hour => 13,3 Mb/sec ? If you do it backwards 13,3 MB/s * 60sec * 60min=47,88GB/h. //Henrik Ruddy STOUDER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SLINK.COM>cc: (bcc: Henrik Wahlstedt) Sent by: "ADSM: Subject: Poor TSM Performances Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] EDU> 2003-03-06 15:07 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" I am quite disappointed by the TSM software performance. Let's take : WIN2000 client, Bi-Pro, nothing running on the machine except TSM client WIN2000 server, Bi-Pro, nothing running on the machine except TSM Server Client is backing up to server, using 100Mb TCP/IP => Throughput of 5,84GB/Hour => 13,3 Mb/sec !!! With LAN-Free, result are the same !!! So, having machines with CPU used with less than 10%, LAN card used at 10%, where is the bottleneck ? Backing up to disk or to LTO tapes does not help increasing the performance. Following parameters are set : TCPBUFFSIZE=128 TCPWINDOWSIZE=63 TCPNODELAY=YES (AND TESTED WITH NO) LARGECOMMBUFFERS=YES (AND TESTED WITH NO) I was hoping to reach at least 25GB/Hours via a TCP/IP 100Mb network and 50GB/Hours via LAN-Free to LAN device Many thanks in advance for any feddback Ruddy Stouder Senior Technical Consultant TSM Certified Consultant I.R.I.S. Rue du Bosquet 10 - Parc Scientifique de Louvain-La-Neuve B-1348 Mont-Saint-Guibert [EMAIL PROTECTED] <http://www.irislink.com <http://www.irislink.com> > Tel: +32 (0)10 48 75 09 - Fax: +32 (0)10 48 75 40 --- The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.
4.2.2.0 client crach rc=4, System object?
Hi, I have a w2k sp3 client with TSM 4.2.2.0. TSM server is 4.1.3.0. During backupwindow my backup schedule starts and completes and fails with RC=4. Then the schedule start to loop i.e restart the schedule during backup window like 30 times and do a backup..each time. I can backup everything with the GUI except System files. If I select System files in a manuel backup the client crash. I´ve read about similar problems http://msgs.adsm.org/cgi-bin/get/adsm0201/210.html. But wasn´t that bug fixed? Only thing I can find in dsm*.log and ACT is 'ANR0480W Session 9571 for node W02 (WinNT) terminated connection with client severed.' at almost the same time the client starts to backup SYSTEM OBJECT. Any ideas? //Henrik --- The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.
TDP for Domino 'invalid ID table'
Hi, TSM server 4.1.3.0 on w2k. Client with TDP for Domino 1.1.2.0, Domino 5.0 build 166 on w2k. After I restored a Notes database and apply logs with TDP agent. I open the database locally on dominoserver then I get 'invalid ID table' when I browse it´s folders. If I dont apply logs it works fine. So, what is 'invalid ID table' and what can I do to fix it? tia //Henrik --- The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.
Re: 4.2.2.0 client crach rc=4, System object?
Tnx for answers Matt & Wanda. //Henrik --- The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.
Re: Interesting LTO fault's symptom
If TSM handles cleaning,it would be great to have CLEANFREQuency=ASNEEDED or a value. None wont help you much in that case. Use None if your library handles cleaning.. //Henrik "Thach, Kevin" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]cc: (bcc: Henrik Wahlstedt) TH.COM> Subject: Re: Interesting LTO fault's symptom Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] RIST.EDU> 2003-06-24 14:35 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" Same situation here. We have a 3584 with 12 drives that have been in use for about a year. We pump about a Terabyte of data through them everyday, and our cleaning tape has been used twice in the past year. We have had numerous tapes get stuck in drives, and had to have IBM come out and take the drives apart to get the tapes out, but we have not had a read or write error on a single tape as of yet. I've spoken to our IBM engineer about the cleaning frequency and she was surprised also. Next time I talk to her I might ask her to research it a little more for me. I also noticed there is a CLEANFREQUENCY parameter that can be set at the drive level within TSM. All of our drives are set to NONE. I wonder if setting this to ASNEEDED would cause them to be cleaned more frequently. -Original Message- From: David Longo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 8:59 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Interesting LTO fault's symptom Interesting. I have had an IBM 3584 library with (8) LTO1 drives, FC attached for over a year with no problem. Cleaning tape was installed initially and autoclean turned on on the library. Tape has not been used yet!. I backup nearly 700GB of data a day and make offsite copies. Don't do a lot of restores. I started with 100 tapes in system and now have 220. I remember a thread some months ago - maybe a year about cleaning. Everybody then commented that their cleaning tapes weren't getting used either. Anybody know what should be a "reasonable" use of the cleaning tape? David B. Longo System Administrator Health First, Inc. 3300 Fiske Blvd. Rockledge, FL 32955-4305 PH 321.434.5536 Pager 321.634.8230 Fax:321.434.5509 [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/23/03 20:14 PM >>> Greeting TSMers, I have read this thread with great interest as we seem to have similar symptoms on the same kind of equipement. IBM are confounded at present but are starting to come to the same conclusion as me that the autoclean symptom on the library is not functioning as it should. We originally put this down to TSM having control of the cleaning tapes but have now resolved this and cleaning is still not happening. We use our drives (3 of them) 18-20 hours a day and the last cleaning was a manual one we did 3 months ago! The IBM engineer said he surprised it still works a
Re: backup systemobject hanging on win2k
Hello Joe and others, The problem might be that your w2k client doesnt 'tell' that the scheduled backup is complete when it contacts your TSM server, instead it starts another scheduled backup i.e. it loops. Probably, you cant locally backup system object either, client will crash. I dont recall the name of the security fix from MS that caused this problem, but we tried to uninstall the fix but that didnt solve the problem. In my case, I´m busy at the moment upgrading 250+ w2k servers to v.5.1.6.0. And the best part is... all security hotfixes will be in SP4 which will be released pretty soon. :D Andy -Do you this as a problem? Also, see previous threads this month about this. //Henrik Joe Howell cc: (bcc: Henrik Wahlstedt) Sent by: Subject: backup systemobject hanging on win2k "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] RIST.EDU> 2003-06-26 15:25 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" I'm running TSM 5.1.5 on OS/390 and backing up Win2K servers running the 5.1.5 client. I issue a "define clientaction nodename action=command object='dsmc backup systemobject'" from the server to each of my clients at the beginning of my backup cycle, followed by a "define clientaction nodename action=incremental" command. The first command gets scheduled right away, but it appears that in many cases the scheduled command takes hours to finish and get out of the way so that the incremental backup can begin. All I see in the server log is that the session times out and that eventually it reconnects and the schedule completes. I don't see any errors in the client log. Any ideas on what might be going on? I do see that the schedule prompter keeps bugging the client to start the incremental; is it possible that this is causing a problem for the client scheduler? Joe Howell Shelter Insurance Companies Columbia, MO - Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! --- The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.
Re: "System files" backup aborts
Hi, This has been discused earlier last month... And like mr Sims would say -Do a search on adsm.org. Or upgrade to v.5.1.6.0 or later. //Henrik Bill Dourado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] LSTEC.COM> cc: (bcc: Henrik Wahlstedt) Sent by: "ADSM:Subject: "System files" backup aborts Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] ST.EDU> 2003-07-08 14:33 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" Hi, Using backup GUI, under SYSTEM OBJECT, I can successfully backup: COM + DB Event Log Registry RSM SYSTEM FILES *** BACK GUI window disappears ! Activity log : 07/08/2003 11:22:34 ANR0480W Session 5102 for node EPO (WinNT) terminated - connection with client severed. Backup client W2K Server - TSM client4.2.3.1 TSM Server W2K Server - TSM Sever 4.1.4.1 Last nights scheduled backup :- dsmerror.log ; dsmsched.log both contain these msgs: 07/07/2003 18:36:01 ANS1802E Incremental backup of '\\epo\c$' finished with 22 failure 07/07/2003 18:36:01 ANS4005E Error processing 'SYSTEM OBJECT': file not found 07/07/2003 18:36:01 ANS1512E Scheduled event 'DAILY_INC' failed. Return code = 4. This is the only client out of 50 that fails in this way and this client has worked OK for a long period until 2/3 weeks ago. Any help will be appreciated. Regards Bill --- The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.
Re: ANR9999D bfcreate.c(1906)
Hello, I coulnt find any usefull on my search, even if the problem is mentioned before. Do you have clue why this happens? 07/09/2003 19:31:20 ANRD bfcreate.c(1918): ThreadId<60> Destination switched from DIRECTORYPOOL to BACKUPPOOL2 in the middle of a transaction. 07/09/2003 19:31:20 ANR0530W Transaction failed for session 2106 for node STO-SQL10 (WinNT) - internal server error detected. Both stgpools are on disk. The problem started after my TSM server upgrade from 4.1.3.0 to 5.1.7.0 Two of 20 NT4 servers, 3.1.0.8, have this problem. TIA Henrik --- The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.
Re: ANR9999D bfcreate.c(1906)
It struck my mind, client versions...
If I dont use DIRMC in my opt-file, the scheduled backup runs fine.
Tivoli might have an interresting article about this but I´m locked out
from their website at the moment.
http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=663&context=SSGSG7&q=Destination+switched&uid=swg21110948&loc=en_US&cs=utf-8&lang=en
Med vänlig hälsning
Henrik Wahlstedt Statoil Phone: +46 8 429 6325
KTJ IT NED SE1Torkel Knutssonsgatan 24 Mobile: +46 70 429 6325
118 88 Stockholm E-mail:
Sverige [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Richard Sims
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: cc: (bcc: Henrik Wahlstedt)
"ADSM: Dist Subject: Re: ANRD bfcreate.c(1906)
Stor Manager"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RIST.EDU>
2003-07-11
13:42
Please
respond to
"ADSM: Dist
Stor Manager"
>I coulnt find any usefull on my search, even if the problem is mentioned
>before. Do you have clue why this happens?
>
>07/09/2003 19:31:20 ANRD bfcreate.c(1918): ThreadId<60> Destination
>switched from DIRECTORYPOOL to BACKUPPOOL2 in the
middle
>of a transaction.
>07/09/2003 19:31:20 ANR0530W Transaction failed for session 2106 for node
>STO-SQL10 (WinNT) - internal server error detected.
>
>Both stgpools are on disk.
>
>The problem started after my TSM server upgrade from 4.1.3.0 to 5.1.7.0
>Two of 20 NT4 servers, 3.1.0.8, have this problem.
Henrik - I believe this occurred because your server upgrade finally put
the
server "out of the reach" of the antiquated client.
As IBM says, they support only recent mixes of client and server
version/releases, with anything outside that span being untested and
"unsupported". You can only keep an old client version around for so long.
Richard Sims, BU
---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you.
Re: Upgrade TSM Server problem
Hi, I thought the uninstall process in TSM server upgrades was removed at v4.1... But uninstall it then.. it wont remove db or logs and .dsk, opt file etc. Install 5.2 ans let us now what happend. It´s only test! You will probably need to recreate the TSM server services. //Henrik Christian Svensson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RISTIE.SE> cc: (bcc: Henrik Wahlstedt) Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Subject: Upgrade TSM Server problem Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > 2003-07-15 11:44 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" Hi! Have anyone try to upgrade there TSM Server to 5.2? I try to upgrade my test TSM Server from 5.1.6.3 to 5.2.0.1 (Windows 2000) But when I try to upgrade it. The installation program says. Please uninstall your old TSM ver. Way do I need to uninstall my TSM Server? I got a TSM Client on the same machine Ver 5.1.5.15. Can the client have any infection to the installation process? Best Regard / Med vänlig hälsning Christian Svensson Tivoli Storage Manager Certified Cristie Nordic AB Box 2 Phone : +46-(0)8-718 43 30 SE-131 06 Nacka Mobil : +46-(0)70-325 15 77 SwedeneMail : Christian. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Visit : Gamla Värmdövägen 4, Plan 2 web : www.cristie.com "Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM" cc: Sent by: "ADSM: Subject: Re: Windows client error and TDP for Exchange question Dist Stor Manager" 2003-07-15 11:31 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" Hi Del! Thank you very much for you reply!!! Kindest regards, Eric van Loon KLM Royal Dutch Airlines -Original Message- From: Del Hoobler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 20:57 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Windows client error and TDP for Exchange question Eric, What "manual" says that the "Exchange Tracking Log is vital for Exchange Server recovery"? That isn't true. You do not need the tracking logs to recover an Exchange Server. You may still want to back those files up... Since these files could be changing, you could change the to copy serialization to dynamic or shared dynamic. Or... use the new 5.2 feature to back up open/locked files. Thanks, Del > Also, there is a TDP for Exchange client installed on this machine. > According to the manual the backup of the Exchange Tracking Log is vital for > recovery, but TSM doesn't seem
Re: Upgrade TSM Server problem
Tnx Mike, but I think the information mostly is intended for Christian
since he asked the question :D
>From TSM4210S_WINDOWS.README.SRV file: (Last part is the best...just goals
folks)
=
TSM Server Upgrade Issues for version 4.2.0.0
=
A number of changes have been incorporated into the current TSM server
package including that the TSM Server licenses, Device Driver, and
Backup-archive client are now in separate packages. These changes will
improve the way you deploy TSM in the long run but requires that all
previous versions of TSM prior to 4.2.0.0 be uninstalled before
installing these packages. It is TSM's goal to not require an
uninstall for future packages.
Med vänlig hälsning
Henrik Wahlstedt Statoil Phone: +46 8 429 6325
KTJ IT NED SE1Torkel Knutssonsgatan 24 Mobile: +46 70 429 6325
118 88 Stockholm E-mail:
Sverige [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mike Hedden
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SOUTH.NET> cc: (bcc: Henrik Wahlstedt)
Sent by: Subject: Re: Upgrade TSM Server problem
"ADSM: Dist
Stor Manager"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RIST.EDU>
2003-07-15
15:31
Please
respond to
"ADSM: Dist
Stor Manager"
Henrik,
The Quick Start and Readme provide instructions which indicate you need to
uninstall the previous release prior to installing 5.2
Regards
Mike
>
> From: Henrik Wahlstedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2003/07/15 Tue AM 06:19:02 EDT
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Upgrade TSM Server problem
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I thought the uninstall process in TSM server upgrades was removed at
> v4.1...
>
> But uninstall it then.. it wont remove db or logs and .dsk, opt file etc.
> Install 5.2 ans let us now what happend. It4s only test! You will
probably
> need to recreate the TSM server services.
>
> //Henrik
>
>
>
>
> Christian Svensson
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> RISTIE.SE> cc: (bcc: Henrik
Wahlstedt)
> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Subject: Upgrade TSM
Server problem
>
Exclude all?
Hello, What is the correct exclude/include statement if I want to exclude everything files, folders and system objects on a w2k box with 5.1.6.0 client, except for C:\Backup\*. //Henrik --- The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.
Re: Exclude all?
Tnx for help! I used 'def sched..' And as I noticed (and probably more one the list..) A simple exclude didnt do it.. : ] //Henrik Andrew Raibeck To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]cc: (bcc: Henrik Wahlstedt) BM.COM> Subject: Re: Exclude all? Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] RIST.EDU> 2003-07-23 14:35 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" See the following items in the ADSM-L archives for earlier responses to similar questions: http://msgs.adsm.org/cgi-bin/get/adsm0305/178.html http://msgs.adsm.org/cgi-bin/get/adsm0203/706.html http://msgs.adsm.org/cgi-bin/get/adsm0108/451.html Regards, Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked. The command line is your friend. "Good enough" is the enemy of excellence. Hello, What is the correct exclude/include statement if I want to exclude everything files, folders and system objects on a w2k box with 5.1.6.0 client, except for C:\Backup\*. --- The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.
Restarts of TSM services
Hi, We are monitoring our w2k sp3 with pre-hotfixes sp4 servers with MOM (MS Operation Manager). And of course, we monitor TSM scheduler services which generates an alert in MOM if a TSM service goes down. And they do that a little bit too frequently.. use repeat count in MOM. I am aware of w2k recovery of services i.e restart of services if it fails, and I use it. I also use a simple registry setting to have TSM services to be dependent on dnscache. But that are only work arounds to get it working, not a solution that ends my minor problem. I would be happy if I found something in Eventviewer or dsmerror.log explaining why TSM services restart, but I dont. Have anyone else experienced this? Uhh I almost forgot, TSM client 4.1.2.12, 4.2.2.0, 5.1.6.0 and some other flavours. TSM servers 5.1.7.0, 5.1.5.4, 4.2.2.8, 4.2.1.9. tia Henrik --- The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.
move nodedata
Hello, I wanted and tried to move a nodes data to a different storagepool, non-collocated to collocated. >From dlt-standard with copypool to dlt-monthly with copypool-monthly. (move nodedata xxx from=dlt-standard to=dlt-monthly) Move within primarypools went ok and I thought that admin schedules (ba stg, expire inventory) would take care of my copypool. I was wrong. Now I have my nodes data on both copypools but only on dlt-monthly priamaypool. (q occ xxx) I havn´t tried to move nodedata xxx from=copypool to=copypool-monthly... 1. What would I have done instead of move nodedata to get a better result? 2. How do I get rid of the extra copy in copypool? 3. Works as designed? tia //Henrik tsm: STO-W03>h move nodedata MOVE NODEDATA MOVE NODEDATA (Move Data by Node in a Sequential Access Storage Pool) Use this command to move data located in a sequential-access storage pool. You can move data for one or more nodes, or a single node with selected filespaces. The data can be located in either a primary or copy storage pool. This command is helpful for reducing the number of volume mounts during client restore or retrieve operations by consolidating data for a specific node within a storage pool, or to move data to another storage pool. For example, you can use this command for moving data to a random-access storage pool in preparation for client restore processing. --- The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.
Re: downward compatibility clients / server v 5.2
Hi, 5.1. Supported by Tivoli is +/- 1 client version. If you have a 5.1 server you can use 4.2, 5.1 and 5.2 clients. //Henrik "Tuyl Adrie, A.C. van" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]cc: (bcc: Henrik Wahlstedt) JEWOUD.NL> Subject: downward compatibility clients / server v 5.2 Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] DU> 2003-09-02 17:33 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To what level downwards are clients compatible to server version 5.2? (I can't seem to find that in the readme's / references (or I am looking in the wrong place in which case I would like to be pointed in the right direction ;-) We are planning for a server upgrade (windows) from level 4.2.2.6, to 5.2 or 5.1 but we need to have some 4.2 clients staying on the 4.2 level. Is this possible / advisable? Or is it better to go to 5.1.7.2? Are there already experiences from 5.2 in a production environment? Thanks for your time, Adrie van Tuyl This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been checked by McAfee Groupshield for the presence of computer viruses. --- The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.
Event ID ( 4097 )
Hi After upgrading a w2k sp3 client from 5.1.6.0 to 5.1.6.6 I get this message in Eventviewer when backup schedule completes. 'The description for Event ID ( 4097 ) in Source ( AdsmClientService ) cannot be found. The local computer may not have the necessary registry information or message DLL files to display messages from a remote computer. The following information is part of the event: Schedule T-BCK-TSB3-WEEKDAY Successfully Completed..' Which DLL and registry information? //Henrik --- The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.
Re: TSM 4.2.2.12 to 5.1.0.0 and over
Hi, You dont have to use 5.1.0.0. Instead, use 5.1.5.0 since it is a base level. And then upgrade to 5.1.6.x or 5.1.7.x. //Henrik Remco Post <[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] nl> cc: (bcc: Henrik Wahlstedt) Sent by: Subject: Re: TSM 4.2.2.12 to 5.1.0.0 and over "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] RIST.EDU> 2003-09-08 10:21 Please respond to r.post Farren Minns said: > Hi TSMers > > Next week I am going to upgrade our 4.2.2.12 TSM installation (running > on Solaris 2.7) to 5.1.6.2 (as I believe this is a good stable release > to go to). > > Now, I understand that I'll have to uninstall the 4.2.2.12 install > before installing 5.1.0.0. I then thought that the 5.1.6.2 patch would > just install over the top, but from looking at the readme, it seems that > I have to uninstall 5.1.0.0 first, and then install 5.1.6.2. Is this > correct? > This is only true for windows servers, I think that on solaris, just like on AIX, you can just upgrade the TSM server (pkgadd will then remove the old version of the software for you in the preinstall script, but I think it is a bit safer.) > Also, do the steps 4.2.2.12 > 5.1.0.0 > 5.1.6.2 sound correct or are > there other steps I should go to in between (or should I be aiming > higher than 5.1.6.2)? I know that 5.2 is out of the question until I > upgrade the server from Solaris 2.7 to 2.8, so that's a no no for now. > from 4.2.2.12 you go to 5.1.0.0, then 5.1.5.0 and then directly on to 5.1.6.2 > I am also wondering if there are any people out there who know of any > specific patches that will be required to run 5.1 on Solaris 2.7. If so, > then I'd be very happy to know before doing the upgrade as sadly I don't > have another machine to test it on. > > Anyway, any help very much appreciated. > > Cheers > > Farren Minns - John Wiley & Sons Ltd > -- Met vriendelijke groeten, Remco Post SARA - Reken- en Netwerkdiensten http://www.sara.nl High Performance Computing Tel. +31 20 592 8008Fax. +31 20 668 3167 PGP keys at http://home.sara.nl/~remco/keys.asc "I really didn't foresee the Internet. But then, neither did the computer industry. Not that that tells us very much of course - the computer industry didn't even foresee that the century was going to end." -- Douglas Adams --- The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.
Re: Event ID ( 4097 )
Hi again,
It´s same entries in dsmsched.log as in NT Eventviewer at the end of the
backup, like objects failed, next schedule, successfully backup of c$ etc.
TSM backup/restore works fine, it´s only how things are displayed in
Eventviewer.
//Henrik
"Stapleton,
Mark"To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]cc: (bcc: Henrik Wahlstedt)
BEE.COM> Subject: Re: Event ID ( 4097 )
Sent by:
"ADSM: Dist
Stor Manager"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RIST.EDU>
2003-09-08
14:53
Please
respond to
"ADSM: Dist
Stor Manager"
From: Henrik Wahlstedt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>After upgrading a w2k sp3 client from 5.1.6.0 to 5.1.6.6 I get
>this message
>in Eventviewer when backup schedule completes.
>
>'The description for Event ID ( 4097 ) in Source ( AdsmClientService )
>cannot be found. The local computer may not have the necessary registry
>information or message DLL files to display messages from a remote
>computer. The following information is part of the event: Schedule
>T-BCK-TSB3-WEEKDAY Successfully Completed..'
>
>Which DLL and registry information?
That's the problem. Just as the message says, the TSM client's registry
lacks enough information or message files to describe exactly what the
problem is.
Using the time stamp on the event ID, examine the dsmsched.log file for
that client. (It wouldn't hurt to look at the TSM server's activity log
either.) Do they indicate what the problem might be?
--
Mark Stapleton ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Berbee Information Networks
Office 262.521.5627
---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you.
Re: reorg offsite data - noncollocated to collocated
Right! But expiration will take care of both copypools, only when primay data will expire... until then you will have 2 copies... Med vänlig hälsning Henrik Wahlstedt Statoil Phone: +46 8 429 6325 KTJ IT NED SE1Torkel Knutssonsgatan 24 Mobile: +46 70 429 6325 118 88 Stockholm E-mail: Sverige [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Kamp, Bruce" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] T> cc: (bcc: Henrik Wahlstedt) Sent by: Subject: Re: reorg offsite data - noncollocated to collocated "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] RIST.EDU> 2003-09-08 18:52 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" I am going through this also. The only way I could figure out was to let expiration take care of it -- Bruce Kamp Midrange Systems Analyst II Memorial Healthcare System E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] P: (954) 987-2020 x4597 F: (954) 985-1404 --- -Original Message- From: i love tsm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 10:58 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi all Hoping someone can help with this "opportunity" we have... For a number of our existing clients we have changed them from using non-collocated to collocated storage. Obviously the next step is to use the move nodedata command to move the old primary data across into the new primary collocated storage pool. This data will then get backed up to the new collocated copy storage pool we've set up. The problem is how do I delete the data for the nodes that will still reside in the old non-collocated copy storage pool.? I don't want to use delete volume because the data is spread over lots , i.e 70+, tapes, and these tapes contain data for nodes we want to leave noncollocated. Wish there was move nodedata command for copystgpools ! Any thoughts or ideas appreciated. TIA _ Find a cheaper internet access deal - choose one to suit you. http://www.msn.co.uk/internetaccess --- The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.
Help with select
Hi, I need some help with this. I would like to have the following output on a select from backup table on Domino trans.logs. NODENAME ACTIVE_VERSION INACTIVE_VERSION Node 1 12062 Node2 80 99 select NODE_NAME,FILESPACE_NAME,STATE,CLASS_NAME, TYPE,HL_NAME,LL_NAME,OBJECT_ID,BACKUP_DATE, DEACTIVATE_DATE from backups where node_name='STO-W24-TDP' and filespace_name='STO-LNS01.DOMLOGS' NODE_NAMEFILESPACE_NAME STATE CLASS_NAME TYPE HL_NAME LL_NAME OBJECT_ID BACKUP_DATE DEACTIVATE_DATE STO-W24-TDP STO-LNS01.DOMLOGS ACTIVE_VERSIONDAILY_TDP_CLASS FILE \0E9479006B6D25C1 S0004683.TXN 1828532092004-11-10 10:00:49.00 STO-W24-TDP STO-LNS01.DOMLOGS ACTIVE_VERSIONDAILY_TDP_CLASS FILE \0E9479006B6D25C1 S0004684.TXN 1828532102004-11-10 10:00:55.00 STO-W24-TDP STO-LNS01.DOMLOGS INACTIVE_VERSION DAILY_TDP_CLASS FILE \0E9479006B6D25C1 S0004137.TXN 1789181222004-10-06 2004-10-18 11:00:45.00 04:05:05.00 STO-W24-TDP STO-LNS01.DOMLOGS INACTIVE_VERSION DAILY_TDP_CLASS FILE \0E9479006B6D25C1 S0004138.TXN 178918123 2004-10-06 2004-10-18 11:00:51.00 04:05:05.00 I got this select but it doesnt work. I wonder what I need to add etc?!?! SelectNode_name, sum(ant_act), sum(ant_inact) from (Select Node_name CASE when state = 'ACTIVE_VERSION'then 1 else 0 END ant_act , CASE when state = 'INACTIVE_VERSION' then 1 else 0 END ant_inact from backups ) t1 group by Node_name ; Anyway, the reason why I want this is that I have seen that incremental backup on two of our Domino servers fails to start when Domisch.log gets corrupted, (I have a PMR about this). Usually I dont read log files on a day to day basis... and it took me some time before I realized I had a problem and found a workaround. The two system expired 60 000 trans. log which brought back some tapes... TIA Henrik --- The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.
Re: ANR4737e message
Hi,
Have you checked your actlog for any I/O errors?
What does Continue Copy on Error show with q node?
Look at 'h upd stg' and CopyContinue.
//Henrik
|+>
|| Timothy Hughes|
|| <[EMAIL PROTECTED]|
|| ATE.NJ.US>|
|| Sent by: "ADSM: Dist |
|| Stor Manager" |
|| <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>|
|||
|||
|| 2004-11-18 14:06 |
|| Please respond to |
|| "ADSM: Dist Stor |
|| Manager" |
|||
|+>
>---|
|
|
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
| cc: (bcc: Henrik Wahlstedt)
|
| Subject: ANR4737e message
|
>---|
Hello all,
Has anyone ever seen this message? 2 nodes received this message and
failed with a return code of 12. The nodes did back up data before they
failed spirixt250 40gb and sprixta_300 53.gb.
11/18/04 01:33:44 ANR4737E Transaction failed for session 826 for
node SPRIX
TA_300 (AIX) - the copy continue attribute for
storage
pool BACKUPPOOL prevented further retries.
(SESSION: 8
ANR2579E Schedule MIDNIGHT in domain PRODUCTION for
node
SPIRIX_300 failed (return code 12). (SESSION: 822
11/18/04 01:13:35 ANR4737E Transaction failed for session 827 for
node SPIR
IXT250 (AIX) - the copy continue attribute for
storage po
ol BACKUPPOOL prevented further retries.
(SESSION: 827)
ANR2579E Schedule MIDNIGHT in domain PRODUCTION for node
SPIRIXT250 failed (return code 12). (SESSION:
823)
11/18/04 01:14:22 ANR0403I Session 823 ended for node SPIRIXT250
(AIX). (SES
SION: 823)
TSM version 5.2.3.4
Clients are AIX 5.2.3.0
Thanks in advance for any responses!
---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you.
Re: Question about LTO2 tape error
Hi Zoltan, Can this be something for you? http://msgs.adsm.org/cgi-bin/get/adsm0409/94.html //Henrik Zoltan Forray/AC/VCUTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]cc: (bcc: Henrik Wahlstedt) EDU> Subject: Question about LTO2 tape error Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] RIST.EDU> 2004-11-18 15:02 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" I am a bit of a newby when it comes to LTO2 tape technology, so please excuse the possible "dumb" question. I received the following error about my LTO2 tape: 11/17/2004 4:38:01 PM ANR8950W Device /dev/rmt3, volume 090046 has issued the following Warning TapeAlert: The tape directory on the tape cartridge just unloaded has been corrupted. File search performance will be degraded. The tape directory can be rebuilt by reading all the data. I was copying the contents to another tape since a previous error caused this tape to go into UNAVAILABLE status. This tape is now empty and scratched. Is there something special I need to do to this tape or will it automagically rebuild the "tape directory" when this tape gets reused ? --- The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.
Re: ANR4737e message
Hi Timothy,
You are right, you should not see CopyContinue i 'q node'... but you see
it with 'q stg f=d'. Look at both primary and copy storage pools.
I still belive you got some I/O error while writing to tape. Did you check
your actlog?
//Henrik
|+>
|| Timothy Hughes|
|| <[EMAIL PROTECTED]|
|| ATE.NJ.US>|
|| Sent by: "ADSM: Dist |
|| Stor Manager" |
|| <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>|
|||
|||
|| 2004-11-18 20:34 |
|| Please respond to |
|| "ADSM: Dist Stor |
|| Manager" |
|||
|+>
>---|
|
|
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
| cc: (bcc: Henrik Wahlstedt)
|
| Subject: Re: ANR4737e message
|
>---|
Henrik,
When I do a q node it does not show the Continue Copy on Error
selection. I used the TSM Gui to show the Copy Storage Pool.
Thanks
Henrik Wahlstedt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Have you checked your actlog for any I/O errors?
> What does Continue Copy on Error show with q node?
> Look at 'h upd stg' and CopyContinue.
>
> //Henrik
>
> |+>
> || Timothy Hughes|
> || <[EMAIL PROTECTED]|
> || ATE.NJ.US>|
> || Sent by: "ADSM: Dist |
> || Stor Manager" |
> || <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>|
> |||
> |||
> || 2004-11-18 14:06 |
> || Please respond to |
> || "ADSM: Dist Stor |
> || Manager" |
> |||
> |+>
> >
-------|
> |
|
> | To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
> | cc: (bcc: Henrik Wahlstedt)
|
> | Subject: ANR4737e message
|
> >
---|
>
> Hello all,
>
> Has anyone ever seen this message? 2 nodes received this message and
> failed with a return code of 12. The nodes did back up data before they
> failed spirixt250 40gb and sprixta_300 53.gb.
>
> 11/18/04 01:33:44 ANR4737E Transaction failed for session 826 for
> node SPRIX
>TA_300 (AIX) - the copy continue attribute for
> storage
>pool BACKUPPOOL prevented further retries.
> (SESSION: 8
>
> ANR2579E Schedule MIDNIGHT in domain PRODUCTION for
> node
>SPIRIX_300 failed (return code 12). (SESSION: 822
>
> 11/18/04 01:13:35 ANR4737E Transaction failed for session 827 for
> node SPIR
>IXT250 (AIX) - the copy continue attribute for
> storage po
>ol BACKUPPOOL prevented further retries.
> (SESSION: 827)
>
> ANR2579E Schedule MIDNIGHT in domain PRODUCTION for node
>SPIRIXT250 failed (return code 12). (SESSION:
> 823)
> 11/18/04 01:14:22 ANR0403I Session 823 ended for node SPIRIXT250
> (AIX). (SES
>SION: 823)
>
> TSM version 5.2.3.4
> Clients are AIX 5.2.3.0
>
> Thanks in advance for any responses!
>
> ---
> The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
> intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of
the
> information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
> addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and
delete
> this message.
> Thank you.
---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you.
Re: tape prob
Hi, Sounds charming trying to be helpfull theese days. :-) It appears to me that you cant use that faulty tape, have you tested to mount the tape in another drive? It´s quite simple, if you cant read the tape... you cant move the data. or force it to move. What he also said was "If there are any errors use the "RESTORE STG" command to repair the storage pool." You can use 'restore vol 002081' or 'restore stg' as suggested assuming you have a copypool if 'move data 002081' doesn´t work. //Henrik "Hashim, Shukrie BSP-ISM/116"To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: tape prob Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] T.EDU> 2004-11-19 08:44 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" ok .. so what you are saying is that .. when I move the data from the faulty tape to another ... tape ... I should do a restore stg right .. ! but .. My question was .. how can I MOVE DATA since everytime the tape is inserted into the drives it couldn't read it ... and it will make the tape READONLY ... and then ... after a few times trying it will make the tape UNAVAILABLE > I thank you .. for telling me what I should do .. after the data is moved ... but what I need is how can I FORCE move the data to another tape ... !! Regards Shukrie -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Orville Lantto Sent: 19 November 2004 12:07 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: tape prob First put the tape in READ-ONLY access with the "UPDATE VOLUME" command, The use the "MOVE DATA" to move the data off the tape. Note any errors. If there are any errors use the "RESTORE STG" command to repair the storage pool. Finally, eject the tape and discard it. Orville L. Lantto Datatrend Technologies, Inc. (http://www.datatrend.com) IBM Premier Business Partner 121 Cheshire Lane, Suite 700 Minnetonka, MN 55305 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. "Hashim, Shukrie BSP-ISM/116" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 11/18/04 08:38 PM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc Subject tape prob Hi all, I have this tape Volume Name: 002081 Storage Pool Name: 3494 Device Class Name: 3494DEV Estimated Capacity (
Command routing
Hello, I have defined a couple of TSM servers (TSM1, TSM2 etc) on our main TSM server and I can route commands ex. TSM2:select xyz or TSM2:q se. My problem is when I try to make a script with selects it wont route the commands, what did I miss? 11/23/2004 10:31:25 ANR2017I Administrator XXX issued command: RUN q_translog 11/23/2004 10:31:25 ANR2017I Administrator XXX issued command: Select Node_name, state, count(*) as "Number of trans.logs" from backups where (node_name='STO-W09-TDP' and filespace_name='STO-LN01.DOMLOGS') group by Node_name ,state order by node_name,state 11/23/2004 10:31:25 ANR2034E SELECT: No match found using this criteria. 11/23/2004 10:31:25 ANR1462I RUN: Command script Q_TRANSLOG completed successfully. tsm: DSM0>q scr q_translog f=d Name: Q_TRANSLOG Line Number: Description Command: Query number of Domino trans.logs Last Update by (administrator): XXX Last Update Date/Time: 11/19/2004 14:07:03 Name: Q_TRANSLOG Line Number: 1 Command: STO-W03: Select Node_name, state, count(*) as "Number of trans.logs" from backups where (node_name='STO-W09-TDP' and filespace_name='STO-LN01.DOMLOGS') group by Node_name ,state order by node_name,state Last Update by (administrator): XXX Last Update Date/Time: 11/19/2004 14:07:03 tsm: DSM0>STO-W03: Select Node_name, state, count(*) as "Number of trans.logs" from backups where (node_name='STO-W09-TDP' and filespace_name ='STO-LN0 1.DOMLOGS') group by Node_name ,state order by node_name,state ANR1699I Resolved STO-W03 to 1 server(s) - issuing command SELECT Node_name, state, count(*) as "Number of trans.logs" from backups where (node_name=STO-W09-TDP and= filespace_name=STO-LN01.DOMLOGS )= group= by= Node_name= ,state= order= by= node_name,state= against server(s). ANR1687I Output for command 'SELECT Node_name, state, count(*) as "Number of trans.logs" from backups where (NODE_NAME=STO-W09-TDP and= FILESPACE_NAME=STO-LN01.DOMLOGS )= group= by= Node_name= ,state= order= by = node_name,state= ' issued against server STO-W03 follows: NODE_NAME STATE Number of trans.logs -- -- STO-W09-TDPACTIVE_VERSION 755 STO-W09-TDP INACTIVE_VERSION 2566 ANR1688I Output for command 'SELECT Node_name, state, count(*) as "Number of trans.logs" from backups where (NODE_NAME=STO-W09-TDP and= FILESPACE_NAME=STO-LN01.DOMLOGS )= group= by= Node_name= ,state= order= by = node_name,state= ' issued against server STO-W03 completed. ANR1694I Server STO-W03 processed command 'SELECT Node_name, state, count (*) as "Number of trans.logs" from backups where (NODE_NAME=STO-W09-TDP and = FILESPACE_NAME=STO-LN01.DOMLOGS )= group= by= Node_name= ,state= order= by = node_name,state= ' and completed successfully. ANR1697I Command 'SELECT Node_name, state, count(*) as "Number of trans.logs" from backups where (NODE_NAME=STO-W09-TDP and= FILESPACE_NAME=STO-LN01.DOMLOGS )= group= by= Node_name= ,state= order= by = node_name,state= ' processed by 1 server(s): 1 successful, 0 with warnings, and 0 with errors. tsm: DSM0> //Henrik --- The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.
Command routing
Hmm, I forgott ( )...
(STO-W03) Select Node_name, state, count(*) as "Number of trans.logs" from
backups where (node_name='STO-W09-TDP' and
filespace_name='STO-LN01.DOMLOGS') group by Node_name ,state order by
node_name,state
//Henrik
- Forwarded by Henrik Wahlstedt on 2004-11-23 12:19 -----
Henrik
WahlstedtTo: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
2004-11-23 Subject: Command routing
10:34
Hello,
I have defined a couple of TSM servers (TSM1, TSM2 etc) on our main TSM
server and I can route commands ex. TSM2:select xyz or TSM2:q se.
My problem is when I try to make a script with selects it wont route the
commands, what did I miss?
11/23/2004 10:31:25 ANR2017I Administrator XXX issued command: RUN
q_translog
11/23/2004 10:31:25 ANR2017I Administrator XXX issued command: Select
Node_name, state, count(*) as "Number of
trans.logs" from
backups where (node_name='STO-W09-TDP' and
filespace_name='STO-LN01.DOMLOGS') group by
Node_name
,state order by node_name,state
11/23/2004 10:31:25 ANR2034E SELECT: No match found using this
criteria.
11/23/2004 10:31:25 ANR1462I RUN: Command script Q_TRANSLOG completed
successfully.
tsm: DSM0>q scr q_translog f=d
Name: Q_TRANSLOG
Line Number: Description
Command: Query number of Domino trans.logs
Last Update by (administrator): XXX
Last Update Date/Time: 11/19/2004 14:07:03
Name: Q_TRANSLOG
Line Number: 1
Command: STO-W03: Select Node_name, state, count(*)
as "Number of trans.logs" from backups where (node_name='STO-W09-TDP' and
filespace_name='STO-LN01.DOMLOGS') group
by Node_name ,state order by node_name,state
Last Update by (administrator): XXX
Last Update Date/Time: 11/19/2004 14:07:03
tsm: DSM0>STO-W03: Select Node_name, state, count(*) as "Number of
trans.logs" from backups where (node_name='STO-W09-TDP' and filespace_name
='STO-LN0
1.DOMLOGS') group by Node_name ,state order by node_name,state
ANR1699I Resolved STO-W03 to 1 server(s) - issuing command SELECT
Node_name, state, count(*) as "Number of trans.logs" from backups where
(node_name=STO-W09-TDP and= filespace_name=STO-LN01.DOMLOGS )= group= by=
Node_name= ,state= order= by= node_name,state= against server(s).
ANR1687I Output for command 'SELECT Node_name, state, count(*) as "Number
of trans.logs" from backups where (NODE_NAME=STO-W09-TDP and=
FILESPACE_NAME=STO-LN01.DOMLOGS )= group= by= Node_name= ,state= order= by
= node_name,state= ' issued against server STO-W03 follows:
NODE_NAME STATE Number of trans.logs
-- --
STO-W09-TDPACTIVE_VERSION 755
STO-W09-TDP INACTIVE_VERSION 2566
ANR1688I Output for command 'SELECT Node_name, state, count(*) as "Number
of trans.logs" from backups where (NODE_NAME=STO-W09-TDP and=
FILESPACE_NAME=STO-LN01.DOMLOGS )= group= by= Node_name= ,state= order= by
= node_name,state= ' issued against server STO-W03 completed.
ANR1694I Server STO-W03 processed command 'SELECT Node_name, state, count
(*) as "Number of trans.logs" from backups where (NODE_NAME=STO-W09-TDP and
=
FILESPACE_NAME=STO-LN01.DOMLOGS )= group= by= Node_name= ,state= order= by
= node_name,state= ' and completed successfully.
ANR1697I Command 'SELECT Node_name, state, count(*) as "Number of
trans.logs" from backups where (NODE_NAME=STO-W09-TDP and=
FILESPACE_NAME=STO-LN01.DOMLOGS )= group= by= Node_name= ,state= order= by
= node_name,state= ' processed by 1 server(s): 1 successful, 0 with
warnings, and 0 with errors.
tsm: DSM0>
//Henrik
---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you.
Re: New hardware, new TSM version
Hi, Why do you need to do an upgrade db after a restore? You restore your db to the same server level, right? And then upgrade.. "Be aware that you will need to do an dsmserv upgradedb after you have restored your databases." //Henrik Daniel Sparrman cc: (bcc: Henrik Wahlstedt) Sent by: "ADSM: Subject: Re: New hardware, new TSM version Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] T.EDU> 2004-11-26 13:50 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" Hi Lars-Erik Easiest way would be to back up the databases on both machines and then restore the databases back to the new hardware. The LTO-1 tapes should have no problems operating with the new LTO-2 drives. However, you will not recieve the larger capacity of the LTO-2(200/400GB). They will still operate with their native capacity(100/200GB). You will however get higher throughput using your new LTO-2 drives with your old LTO-1 tapes. I believe the throughputrate is somewhere at 25MB/s. When you have your new hardware up and running (new servers and new tape drives) you can migrate the information from the old LTO-1 tapes to new LTO-2 tapes to utilize the increase in capacity. Be aware that you will need to do an dsmserv upgradedb after you have restored your databases. If you have any further questions, plz email me directly. Best Regards Daniel Sparrman --- Daniel Sparrman Chef Utveckling & Drift Exist i Stockholm AB Propellervägen 6B 183 62 TÄBY Växel: 08 - 754 98 00 Mobil: 070 - 399 27 51 Lars-Erik Öhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2004-11-26 13:35 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc Subject New hardware, new TSM version Server W2k TSM 5.1.5.0 and 5.1.7.0 Library: 3583 LTO1 I will upgrade both of my server to new hardware and run Windows 2003 on them. I will also upgrade to version 5.2.2.X (the 5.2.2 CD is delivered to me). I will upgrade my 3583 library to LTO2 drives. How can i move all my data to the new servers? Meaning all my MC, Policys, Schedules, scripts etc. Can I dump the database and restore it on the new server? Are there any good redbooks about this? Thanks in advance. /Larsa Lars-Erik Öhman IT Systems, servers and applications Carnegie Investment Bank AB Gustav Adolfstorg 18 103 38 Stockholm tel. +46 8 676 88 14 www.carnegie.se This communication is from a Carnegie company within the Carnegie Group. The information contained in it, including any attachment or enclosure, is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any unauthorised use, review, retransmissions, dissemination, copying or other use of, or taking of any a
Re: New hardware, new TSM version
Hi Daniel,
That was what I expected. I was only wondering if I missed something.
But I also found this article:
http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=663&context=SSGSG7&q1=restore+db&uid=swg1IC43394&loc=en_US&cs=utf-8&lang=en
"Tivoli Storage Manager only supports restoring a database using the same
level of server code (version,release,modification) that was used to
create the
database backup. You cannot restore a prior version's backed up database
onto the latest version of Tivoli Storage Manager Server. For instance,
you cannot restore a Tivoli Storage Manager Version 4.2.1.0 or 5.1.5.0
database onto Tivoli Storage Manager 5.2.2.0 server."
//Henrik
Daniel Sparrman
cc: (bcc: Henrik Wahlstedt)
Sent by: "ADSM: Subject: Re: New hardware, new
TSM version
Dist Stor
Manager"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
T.EDU>
2004-11-26 16:10
Please respond
to "ADSM: Dist
Stor Manager"
Hi Henrik
In this scenario, I expected that he wouldnt upgrade the software level on
his existing servers... Therefore he would be forced todo an upgrade db on
the new server after doing the database restore.
But thats correct. He could aswell upgrade his existing servers to the
correct level before doing the database backup in preparation of the move.
Best Regards
Daniel Sparrman
---
Daniel Sparrman
Chef Utveckling & Drift
Exist i Stockholm AB
Propellervägen 6B
183 62 TÄBY
Växel: 08 - 754 98 00
Mobil: 070 - 399 27 51
Henrik Wahlstedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
2004-11-26 15:33
Please respond to
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
Subject
Re: New hardware, new TSM version
Hi,
Why do you need to do an upgrade db after a restore? You restore your db
to
the same server level, right? And then upgrade..
"Be aware that you will need to do an dsmserv upgradedb after you have
restored your databases."
//Henrik
Daniel Sparrman
cc: (bcc: Henrik
Wahlstedt)
Sent by: "ADSM: Subject: Re: New hardware,
new TSM version
Dist Stor
Manager"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
T.EDU>
2004-11-26 13:50
Please respond
to "ADSM: Dist
Stor Manager"
Hi Lars-Erik
Easiest way would be to back up the databases on both machines and then
restore the databases back to the new hardware.
The LTO-1 tapes should have no problems operating with the new LTO-2
drives. However, you will not recieve the larger capacity of the
LTO-2(200/400GB). They will still operate with their native
capacity(100/200GB). You will however get higher throughput
Re: auto reply for checkin and checkout
Hi, Try: checkout libv library tape remove=bulk checkl=n checkin libv library search=bulk checkl=barcode status=pri. Med vänlig hälsning Henrik Wahlstedt Statoil Phone: +46 8 429 6325 KTJ IT NED SE1Torkel Knutssonsgatan 24 Mobile: +46 70 429 6325 118 88 Stockholm E-mail: Sverige [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mark StrasheimTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]cc: (bcc: Henrik Wahlstedt) -BA.DE> Subject: auto reply for checkin and checkout Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] RIST.EDU> 2004-11-30 11:27 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" Aloha, is there is possibility to avoid the need of reply(ing) to checkout and checkin processes. with regrads Mark Strasheim -- definitiv! business applications GmbH & Co. KG Fresnostrasse 14 - 18 · DE-48159 Münster Tel. +49 (0) 251 21092 - 23 · Fax +49 (0) 251 21092 - 29 <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] · <http://www.definitiv-ba.de/> http://www.definitiv-ba.de -- --- The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.
Clientactions and firewalls
Hi, I have a problem with define client actions across firewalls. TSM server 5.2.2.5 on w2k and TSM client .5.1.7.3 on NT4. Schedmode is set to prompted on both server and client. Client highlevel and lowlevel address are specified. TSM server actlog, 'q act begind=-1 s=NodeA: 06-12-2004 13:38:08 ANR2017I Administrator issued command: DEFINE CLIENTACTION NodeA obj=c: (SESSION: 9324) 06-12-2004 13:38:08 ANR2017I Administrator issued command: DEFINE ASSOCIATION NT-SVG @194 NodeA (SESSION: 9324) policy domain NT-SVG. (SESSION: 9324) . . 06-12-2004 19:30:01 ANR2578W Schedule P-WEEKDAY in domain NT-SVG for node NodeA has missed its scheduled start up window.(Daily backup schedule that starts ar 16:30.) TSM server is not even trying to contact the client. The client starts it´s schedule @194 if I restart the service as I did this morning at 09:30. Last entry in dsmsched.log: 06-12-2004 13:33:33 Waiting to be contacted by the server. Somebody that can spreed some light here pls? What am I doing wrong?? //Henrik --- The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.
TSM server is using wrong port number accoss a firewall.
Hi I have a problem with client port numbers across firewalls. TSM server 5.2.2.5 on w2k and TSM client .5.1.6.6 on w2k. Schedmode is set to prompted on both server and client. Client highlevel and lowlevel address are specified. Client has two scheduler services and two nodenames, NodeB and NodeB-Monthly. q n NodeB f=d: High-Level Address: x.x.x.x Low-level Address: 1501 q act begind=-1 s=NodeB: 06-12-2004 16:31:08 ANR2716E Schedule prompter was not able to contact client NodeB using type 1 (x.x.x.x 1757). (SESSION: 1) 06-12-2004 19:30:01 ANR2578W Schedule P-WEEKDAY in domain NT-SVG for node NodeB has missed its scheduled start up window. Why is TSM using port 1757?!? TIA Henrik --- The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.
scripts.smp
Hi, Windows TSM server 5.2.2.5. On an idle friday afternoon... I wanted to check out q_proc_stats scipt in scripts.smp. I renamed it to scripts.mac and run 'macro scripts.mac'. It ran to: def script q_archret_gt desc='Show mgmt classes with archive retention > X days' ANR2002E Missing closing quote character. ANS8001I Return code 3. I seems like define script doesn´t work with a space before > in description field. It might not be a big deal but i didnt want to take down TSM to run 'dsmserv runfile scripts.smp' which of course most likely will fail anyway.. Now it´s time to use find & replace... //Henrik tsm: STO-W03>def script q_archret_gt desc='"Show mgmt classes with archive retention > X days"' ANR2002E Missing closing quote character. ANS8001I Return code 3. tsm: STO-W03>def script q_archret_gt desc='"Show mgmt classes with archive retention X days"' ANR1454I DEFINE SCRIPT: Command script Q_ARCHRET_GT defined. tsm: STO-W03>del scr Q_ARCHRET_GT Do you wish to proceed? (Yes (Y)/No (N)) y ANR1457I DELETE SCRIPT: Command script Q_ARCHRET_GT deleted. tsm: STO-W03>def script q_archret_gt desc='Show mgmt classes with archive retention > X days' ANR2002E Missing closing quote character. ANS8001I Return code 3. tsm: STO-W03>def script q_archret_gt desc='Show mgmt classes with archive retention X days' ANR1454I DEFINE SCRIPT: Command script Q_ARCHRET_GT defined. tsm: STO-W03>del scr Q_ARCHRET_GT Do you wish to proceed? (Yes (Y)/No (N)) y ANR1457I DELETE SCRIPT: Command script Q_ARCHRET_GT deleted. tsm: STO-W03>def scr test2 desc=">" ANR1454I DEFINE SCRIPT: Command script TEST2 defined. tsm: STO-W03>del sct test2 ANR2000E Unknown command - DELETE SCT. ANS8001I Return code 2. tsm: STO-W03>del scr test2 Do you wish to proceed? (Yes (Y)/No (N)) y ANR1457I DELETE SCRIPT: Command script TEST2 deleted. tsm: STO-W03>def scr test2 desc=" >" ANR2002E Missing closing quote character. ANS8001I Return code 3. --- The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.
TSM client uppgrade 5.1.7.3 to 5.2.3.11
Hi, If I upgrade TSM client on a w2k3 server, 5.1.7.3 to 5.2.3.11. Then I have SYSTEM OBJECT´s in 'q fi'. Compared to a clean install of 5.2.3.11. Why does SYSTEM OBJECT remain? I think SYSTEM OBJECT should be converted or expired... hopefully I´m just missing something here... Any thoughts? TSM server on w2k, 5.2.2.5. Upgraded 5.1.7.3 to 5.2.3.11, q fi: Node Name Filespace Name --- -- STO-TW01SYSTEM OBJECT STO-TW01\\sto-tw01 \c$ STO-TW01SYSTEM STATE STO-TW01SYSTEM SERVICES STO-TW01ASR 5.2.3.11, q fi: Node Name Filespace Name --- -- STO-TW09SYSTEM SERVICES STO-TW09SYSTEM STATE STO-TW09ASR STO-TW09\\sto-tw09\c$ tia //Henrik --- The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.
Re: TSM client uppgrade 5.1.7.3 to 5.2.3.11
Ok and thanks for your answer Andy. It makes me curious.. Why and when would I use SYSTEM OBJECT in a w2k3 restore with a 5.2 client. It got to be a reason why that possibility still exist? Documentations only mentions restore systemstate/systemservices on w2k3. http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=663&context=SSGSG7&q1=restore+%2bwindows&uid=swg21164812&loc=en_US&cs=utf-8&lang=en //Henrik Andrew Raibeck To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU <[EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: (bcc: Henrik Wahlstedt) BM.COM> Subject: Re: TSM client uppgrade 5.1.7.3 to 5.2.3.11 Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] RIST.EDU> 2005-01-24 15:21 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" The 5.2 (and higher) client uses Microsoft's Volume Snapshot Services (VSS) for backing up Windows 2003 system state and system services, whereas the 5.1 client uses the Microsoft "legacy" API functions. The two methods are incompatible and cannot be converted between each other. Since the SYSTEM OBJECT file space is still restorable by the 5.2 client, the 5.3 client does not delete that file space. Once you have been running the 5.3 client for a period time, you can delete the old SYSTEM OBJECT file space at your discretion. Regards, Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked. The command line is your friend. "Good enough" is the enemy of excellence. "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 2005-01-24 06:43:08: > Hi, > > If I upgrade TSM client on a w2k3 server, 5.1.7.3 to 5.2.3.11. Then I have > SYSTEM OBJECT´s in 'q fi'. Compared to a clean install of 5.2.3.11. > Why does SYSTEM OBJECT remain? I think SYSTEM OBJECT should be converted or > expired... hopefully I´m just missing something here... > > Any thoughts? > > TSM server on w2k, 5.2.2.5. > > Upgraded 5.1.7.3 to 5.2.3.11, q fi: > Node Name Filespace Name > --- -- > STO-TW01SYSTEM OBJECT > STO-TW01\\sto-tw01 \c$ > STO-TW01SYSTEM STATE > STO-TW01SYSTEM SERVICES > STO-TW01ASR > &
Re: Backing up Domino logged databases
Hi, I´m not sure what the problem is with one tape mount per trans. log restore. Are you using collocation for that TDP node? Forever in my world is: I do weekly selective, daily incremental and hourly trans. log backups. To do a point in time restore and apply logs to the day next selective backup take place is a ~3 hours work for TSM. My Domino server have 3000 DB´s. My speed is very tight related to DLT7000.. :-) //Henrik Arun Sondhi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU KWELL.COM> cc: (bcc: Henrik Wahlstedt) Sent by: "ADSM:Subject: Re: Backing up Domino logged databases Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] ST.EDU> 2005-01-25 14:19 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" What has been the experience of the group with recovering logged databases? We see that the recovery manager takes forever to recover the transaction logs, for they are so small and secondly that the tape is mounted and label is verified for every log. Sincerely, Arun Sondhi Ph : +1 414.382.0206 Pg : +1 414.341.8650 Mo : +1 414.213.1540 Extn: 20206 Jozef Zatko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" 01/25/2005 07:06 AM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU cc: Subject:Re: Backing up Domino logged databases Bill, after switching logging in Domino to any type (circular or archive), incremental backup process only databases for which DBIID changed or which were deleted (inactivation in TSM). You have to use combination of incremental and selective backup now, i.e. daily selective and once pre week incremental. Hope this helps. Ing. Jozef Zatko Login a.s. Dlha 2, Stupava tel.: (421) (2) 60252618 Bill Boyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" 01/25/2005 01:55 PM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU cc Subject Backing up Domino logged databases If I run an INCREMENTAL * backup nightly and the Domino admin turns on circular logging, does that INCREMENTAL still function the way it did, or does it now switch over and not back up the database becuase is it "logged" even though it is circular logging and I can't archive those logs? I have a client that has been running the INCREMENTAL now for years and last fall the Domino admin turned on circular logging. Now the nightly incremental only does a handful of databases. Bill Boyer "An Optimist is just a pessimist with no job experience." - Scott Adams ForwardSourceID:NT00056
Disk configuration
Hi, I got a new disk enclosure, singe bus, and 14 ultra320 300GB disks (HPProliant) to my w2k3 TSM server. I dont need all gigabytes, at maximum I backup 750Gb per day which includes weekly TDP backups. Normally the amount of data is 150Gb. Today I have one archive- 150Gb, backup- 600Gb, directory- 10Gb and collo-file-pool 100Gb. My question is, what might be the best disk configuration of 4 disk storagepools? One raid5 with 14 disks and one volume i Windows.. or 7 raid1 or your suggestions. tia //Henrik --- The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.
Re: NTFS security
Hi, You doesn´t tell us if you restore SystemState with TSM or not. ? If you are using CBMR from Cristie you should be aware of that CBMR formats the partition with FAT. CBMR recovers the files and at the end of the recovery process converts the filesystem into NTFS. Convert takes place after restore! I would not expect that your recovered server would have the right rights when FAT doesnt support rights You have default NT rights I asume = Everyone-Fullcontrol (I think that it is in the CBMR documentation, last step in a recovery process... use TSM... but it was long time ago I read it.) //Henrik Henrik Hansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU LBINT.COM> cc: (bcc: Henrik Wahlstedt) Sent by: "ADSM: Subject: NTFS security Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] .EDU> 2005-02-15 14:47 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" I'm working on a BCR scenario that involves Intel servers. I have a "master" server that is used for backups and restores. All systems looks alike (citrix) I make a bare metal restore with a software Christe. Then change the name of the Restored system from MF1 to MF2 for insteance. In TSM I change the node name and filespace name to the new name. Then I restore the files to the new server with new name. Using the "master backup" files. Then I do a SID change... That works fine, but the NTFS rights isn't correct on the new server. Does anyone have a thought about why they don't. Everything else seems to e ok. --- The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.
Re: TSM Windows Client 5.2.4?
Hi, Aprils sounds right according to http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=663&context=SSGSG7&q1=release+plans&uid=swg21171013&loc=en_US&cs=utf-8&lang=en. //Henrik "Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM" To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: TSM Windows Client 5.2.4? Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] RIST.EDU> 2005-02-16 08:57 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" Hi Todd! I have been told, it will be out somewhere around April. Kindest regards, Eric van Loon KLM Royal Dutch Airlines -Original Message- From: Todd Lundstedt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 18:32 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: TSM Windows Client 5.2.4? Is there a release date on this? I am using 5.2.2.0 on a W2K node (server is 5.2.2.5 on AIX 5.2-03). Tried to do an Image backup and we got a few error messages during the backup. A quick search at ibm.com returned a single entry that matched my error almost to the letter, and indicated the problem has been fixed in the software version 5.2.4, but I don't see that version on the FTP site yet. It also indicated that a work around was to set resourceutilization to 1, and that seems to work, for now. ** For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete this message. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. ** --- The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.
Disable sessions at startup, q stat - Availability: Enabled
Hi, How do I disable sessions and keep sessions disabled even if I restart my TSM server (w2k, 5.2.2.5) ? //Henrik --- The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.
Install a second server instance
Hi, How to I install a second server instance without using the management console on a w2k, 5.2.2.5 server? //Henrik --- The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.
dsmserv format + initnode.dat
Hi, In admin ref. guide v5.2 under dsmserv format it states that I should use the file, initnode.dat. Where is it? Is there any other file I should run? I cant find the file on my 5.2.0.0 or 5.2.2.0 CD´s when I search the whole CD, or in the 5.2.2.5 package I downloaded? And dsmfmt is under \tsm\console\, not under \utils. "From the c:\"program files"\tivoli\tsm\server2 directory, enter the following commands: ..\utils\dsmfmt -data data1.dsm 4 ..\server\dsmserv -k server2 format 1 log1.dsm 9 1 db1.dsm 13 ..\server\dsmserv -k server2 runfile ..\server\initnode.dat ..\server\dsmserv -k server2 runfile ..\server\dsmserv.idl Copy ..\server\dsmserv.opt ..\utils\adsm" //Henrik --- The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.
QUERY FILESPACE: No match found using this criteria
Hi, I dont get this logic when I do a 'q fi'. Anyone who knows what might be wrong or seen this before? I´m not doing anything else except q fi againt thoose filespaces. TSM 5.2.2.5 on w2k3. Thanks Henrik tsm: x>q fi sto-tw01 Node Name Filespace FSID Platform Filespace Is Files- Capacity Pct Name Type pace(MB) Util Unicode? --- --- - - - STO-TW01SYSTEM 1 WinNTSYSTEM No 0.0 0.0 OBJECT STO-TW01\\sto-tw01-2 WinNTNTFS No 34,691.9 25.1 \c$ STO-TW01SYSTEM 3 WinNTSYSTEM Yes 0.0 0.0 STATE STO-TW01SYSTEM 4 WinNTSYSTEM Yes 0.0 0.0 SERVICES STO-TW01ASR5 WinNTNTFS Yes 0.0 0.0 tsm: x>q fi sto-tw01 \\sto-tw01\c$ Node Name Filespace FSID Platform Filespace Is Files- Capacity Pct Name Type pace(MB) Util Unicode? --- --- - - - STO-TW01\\sto-tw01-2 WinNTNTFS No 34,691.9 25.1 \c$ tsm: x>q fi sto-tw02 Node Name Filespace FSID Platform Filespace Is Files- Capacity Pct Name Type pace(MB) Util Unicode? --- --- - - - STO-TW02SYSTEM 1 WinNTSYSTEM Yes 0.0 0.0 OBJECT STO-TW02\\sto-tw02-2 WinNTNTFS Yes17,320.1 26.7 \c$ STO-TW02\\sto-tw02-3 WinNTNTFS Yes17,367.9 9.0 \e$ STO-TW02SYSTEM 4 WinNTSYSTEM Yes 0.0 0.0 STATE STO-TW02SYSTEM 5 WinNTSYSTEM Yes 0.0 0.0 SERVICES STO-TW02ASR6 WinNTNTFS Yes 0.0 0.0 tsm: x>q fi sto-tw02 \\sto-tw02\c$ ANR2034E QUERY FILESPACE: No match found using this criteria. ANS8001I Return code 11. --- The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.
Re: QUERY FILESPACE: No match found using this criteria
Thanks. //Henrik "Das, Samiran (IDS ECCS)" To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: QUERY FILESPACE: No match found using this criteria Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] RIST.EDU> 2005-03-09 13:08 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" Henrik, Add nametype=unicode at the end of the command line. tsm: x>q fi sto-tw02 \\sto-tw02\c$ nametype=unicode Regards, Samiran Das -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Henrik Wahlstedt Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2005 7:00 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: QUERY FILESPACE: No match found using this criteria Hi, I dont get this logic when I do a 'q fi'. Anyone who knows what might be wrong or seen this before? I´m not doing anything else except q fi againt thoose filespaces. TSM 5.2.2.5 on w2k3. Thanks Henrik tsm: x>q fi sto-tw01 Node Name Filespace FSID Platform Filespace Is Files- Capacity Pct Name Type pace(MB) Util Unicode? --- --- - - - STO-TW01SYSTEM 1 WinNTSYSTEM No 0.0 0.0 OBJECT STO-TW01\\sto-tw01-2 WinNTNTFS No 34,691.9 25.1 \c$ STO-TW01SYSTEM 3 WinNTSYSTEM Yes 0.0 0.0 STATE STO-TW01SYSTEM 4 WinNTSYSTEM Yes 0.0 0.0 SERVICES STO-TW01ASR5 WinNTNTFS Yes 0.0 0.0 tsm: x>q fi sto-tw01 \\sto-tw01\c$ Node Name Filespace FSID Platform Filespace Is Files- Capacity Pct Name Type pace(MB) Util Unicode? --- --- - - - STO-TW01\\sto-tw01-2 WinNTNTFS No 34,691.9 25.1 \c$ tsm: x>q fi sto-tw02 Node Name Filespace FSID Platform Filespace Is Files- Capacity Pct Name
Re: ITSM Client Install Problem (UNCLASSIFIED)
Hi, Have you tried to first uninstall the old TSM client and then install the new one. Or install a 5.1 client since NT4 isn´t supported on 5.2, and then upgrade to 5.2 since the box actually is a w2k client? What more errors do you get? //Henrik "Bradshaw, Cecil C Mr DATACEN/IBM" To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]cc: (bcc: Henrik Wahlstedt) .ARMY.MIL> Subject: ITSM Client Install Problem (UNCLASSIFIED) Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] U> 2005-03-22 21:52 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Caveats: NONE One of my client admin, in the process of updating the client box from Win-NT to Win-2K, Did the following: (TSM CSS is the name of the ITSM client service on the box.) 1) loaded the Windows 2000 Advanced Server CD while in windows and following the on-screen wizard 2) Upgraded the box from Windows NT 4.0. 3) After upgrading, stopped the TSM CSS services and attempted to install the Tivoli product Result of the attempt to install ITSM is the message: "Tivoli Storage Manager Client Requires Windows NT 4," and the following from the event log: The description for Event ID ( 1 ) in Source ( MsiInstaller ) cannot be found. The local computer may not have the necessary registry information or message DLL files to display messages from a remote computer. The following information is part of the event: Product: Tivoli Storage Manager Client -- Tivoli Storage Manager Client Requires Windows NT 4, (NULL), (NULL), (NULL), (NULL), (NULL), (NULL). ITSM client to be installed is V5.2.3. admin does not wish to 'fall back' to NT. Any other suggestions? tia, Brad Cecil C. 'Brad' Bradshaw, Jr. Contractor, Harbour Links LLC Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Caveats: NONE --- The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.
Re: Can I exclude he WinSxS folder on Windows2003 server?
Hi, I have seen a similar problem with .Net Framework and temporary security/policy files which was supposed to be solved in 5.2. Ask the exchange admin who should know if you can exclude the file(s). Client version? //Henrik William Boyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU CAST.NET>cc: (bcc: Henrik Wahlstedt) Sent by: Subject: Can I exclude he WinSxS folder on Windows2003 server? "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] RIST.EDU> 29.03.2005 16:10 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" I have a client with a Windows2003 server with Exchange 2003 on it. Lately he started seeing errors in his nightly non-Exchange backups relating to a file in the C:\Windows\WinSxS folder. I've search the archives and came up dry. No hits on IBM either. I Google search brought up some information on package assemblies. Would it be safe to EXCLUDE.DIR the C:\WINDOWS\WINSXS directory? The error(s) the client is getting are: 03/28/2005 03:32:13 ANS1228E Sending of object '\\hbgexchits1\c $\WINDOWS\WinSxS\Policies\x86_policy.5.2.Microsoft.Windows.SystemCompatible_6595b64144ccf1df_x-ww_92C6FB91\5.2.0.0.p olicy' failed 03/28/2005 03:32:13 ANS4023E Error processing '\\hbgexchits1\c $\WINDOWS\WinSxS\Policies\x86_policy.5.2.Microsoft.Windows.SystemCompatible_6595b64144ccf1df_x-ww_92C6FB91\5.2.0.0.p olicy': file input/output error 03/28/2005 03:32:44 ANS1512E Scheduled event 'BD70330' failed. Return code = 12. And the backup schedule indicates failed. Bill Boyer "Growing old is mandatory, growing up is optional" - ?? --- The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.
Re: ANR0209E Page address mismatch detected on recovery log
I want to add a comment.
The point to me is that an audit db FAILS to detect and correct the error.
Period. And thats is not good since we reley on our db to read our tapes.
An unload may discover a corruption and we have the possibilities to audit
or dump our db.
And when thoose option
fails..
somebody wont get happy and you loose data.
In Antons case I dont know what the solution is besides a restore from a
previus db backup.
"ANR0209E Page address mismatch detected on recovery log volume
ADSMRE.RCVLOG2B,
ANR0209E logical page 0 (physical page 18688); actual: 129024."
In an other case like this below, is something you DONT want to see.
The TSM server starts and you can do backup, restores, migration and
reclamation etc. Some backup are sucessfull and some fails with:
15-02-2005 21:15:36 ANR0406I Session 1941 started for node ST-WZ07
(WinNT)
(Tcp/Ip 143.97.143.52(1449)). (SESSION: 1941)
15-02-2005 21:15:37 ANR0102E imbkins.c(4103): Error 1 inserting row in
table
"Backup.Objects". (SESSION: 1941)
15-02-2005 21:15:37 ANR0530W Transaction failed for session 1941 for
node
ST-WZ07 (WinNT) - internal server error detected.
(SESSION: 1941)
(Cleanup backup groups)
Unload DB failed
Dump DB ok
Load DB failed
Audit DB... = restore db later on
ANR4177I AUDITDB: Primary backup entry for an object (0.57126454) cannot be
found - entry will be deleted.
ANR4177I AUDITDB: Primary backup entry for an object (0.57128288) cannot be
found - entry will be deleted.
ANR4306I AUDITDB: Processed 72911226 database entries (cumulative).
ANR4306I AUDITDB: Processed 73139460 database entries (cumulative).
ANR4306I AUDITDB: Processed 73325165 database entries (cumulative).
ANR4306I AUDITDB: Processed 73441006 database entries (cumulative).
ANRD imaudit.c(776): ThreadId<0> Audit of one or more secondary tables
failed, objRc=0, expRc=0, grpRc=4
Callchain of previous message: 7C59BBF3 RaiseException()+56 <-
1000F969 tsmInitializeServer()+8139 <- 104E6399 outTextf()+1469 <-
10222EBB tsmInitializeServer()+21B68B <-
ANR4142I AUDITDB: Database audit process terminated in error.
Wort a note: Anton used TSM 5.2.1.0 on an Z/OS. In the other was a w2k
server with 5.2.2.5 involved.
//Henrik
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
"ADSM: Dist cc: (bcc: Henrik Wahlstedt)
Stor Manager"Subject: Re: ANR0209E Page address
mismatch detected on recovery log
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RIST.EDU>
2005-03-30
18:04
Please
respond to
"ADSM: Dist
Stor Manager"
==> On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 07:25:17 -0500, Richard Sims <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I rue the day that IBM started encouraging customers to take their TSM
> system out of service and run salvage utilities to reorganize the db, as
> situations like this inevitably result, particularly as these utilities
are
> not subject to the same development intensity and scrutiny as mainline
TSM
> code. This has been a very poor decision on someone's part in IBM, to
foster
> this kind of risky undertaking in enterprise sites as though it were a
> casual, risk-free activity. Some vendor thinking is just unfathomable.
I don't share Richard's tropism away from the offline utilities. However,
embarking on any such process without a DB incremental immediately previous
is, well, foolhardy.
I think of the motorcyclists I sometimes see, on the highway with shorts, a
tank-top, flip-flops and sunglasses in leiu of helmet.
If you run regular DB fulls, and cut incrementals before you do anything
scary, you limit your downside to inconvenience and a setback schedule. I
highly recommend the practice.
BTW, I've promoted my DB reload procedure to our main site. Thanks greatly
to those of you who commented. I continue to solicit experiences of before
and after sizes, and comments about behavior before and after.
http://open-systems.ufl.edu/services/NSAM/maint_docs/db_un_reload.html
- Allen S. Rout
---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you.
Re: Programmes Guide
No and no.
The closest you can get is something like this:
"select distinct node_name, volume_name, copy_type, stgpool_name from
volumeusage where node_name='X' and filespace_name='Y'"
Add "and volume_name not in(select volume_name from libvolumes)" and use
copy_type and stgpool_name to narrow your results if you like.
//Henrik
Karin Dambacher
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
MPRISE.DE>cc: (bcc: Henrik Wahlstedt)
Sent by: "ADSM: Subject: Programmes Guide
Dist Stor Manager"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
EDU>
14.04.2005 14:07
Please respond to
"ADSM: Dist Stor
Manager"
Hi all,
does anyone know, where to find online (the) a TSM programmer's guide?
Is there a possiblity to get a list of tapes, where are a client's data ?
Not all tapes (I know this select), but if I want to do a "restore
c:\home" only the tapes I need for that restore?
Thanks for every help, regards, Karin Dambacher
---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you.
DB or LOG mirroring
Hi, Windows admin guide 5.2 says that you can define a dbcopy or logcopy with "define dbcopy(logc) vol1 e:\dbvol\vola formatsize=25". So I tested it on my 5.2.2.5 server. TSM:SERVER1> define logcopy E:\TSM\TSMLOG\log01.dsm E:\TSM\TSMLOG\LOG01M.DSM formatsize=2500 ANR2017I Administrator SERVER_CONSOLE issued command: DEFINE LOGCOPY E: \TSM\TSMLOG\log01.dsm E:\TSM\TSMLOG\LOG01M.DSM formatsize=2500 ANR9969E Unable to open volume E:\TSM\TSMLOG\LOG01M.DSM. The most likely reason is that another TSM server is running and has the volume allocated. ANR2404E DEFINE LOGCOPY: Volume E:\TSM\TSMLOG\LOG01M.DSM is not available. TSM:SERVER1> Help define logcopy doesnt show any information about the formatsize parameter? Obviously the failure is because I havent formatted a mirror volume. Should "define dbcopy vol1 e:\dbvol\vola formatsize=25" work? And, will this differ in TSM? dsmfmt -db E:\TSM\TSMLOG\LOG01M.DSM 2500 DEFINE LOGCOPY E:\TSM\TSMLOG\log01.dsm E:\TSM\TSMLOG\LOG01M.DSM With define logv E:\TSM\TSMLOG\LOG01M.DSM formatsize=2500 del logv E:\TSM\TSMLOG\LOG01M.DSM DEFINE LOGCOPY E:\TSM\TSMLOG\log01.dsm E:\TSM\TSMLOG\LOG01M.DSM Not the most practical way to do it, I know, but it works from web gui //Henrik --- The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.
Re: TSM 5.3 and the good-old WEBadmin good news
David vs Goliat... //Henrik Richard van Denzel To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]cc: (bcc: Henrik Wahlstedt) LTN.NL> Subject: TSM 5.3 and the good-old WEBadmin good news Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] RIST.EDU> 04.05.2005 11:59 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" All, You can download files from ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/storage/tivoli-storage-management/tools (for unix (AIX, HP, Linux and Sun) and Windows) to enable the good-old WEBadmin in TSM 5.3 (see the README on the FTP site for details). They state that it will work for at least 6 months or upt March 2006. Tears were running from my eyes ;-) when I saw the WEBadmin again working on a 5.3 server.. Cheers, Richard. --- The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.
Re: Inquiry About TSM Database
Hi, I´m not sure you can do that without taking the output from 'q db' and put into a spreedsheet on a daily basis..etc.. Consider using VB or Perl to automate it a little. A prediction might be good, but to me it is better to be warned when DB utilization is 90% or so, and then schedule a extention of the database? Operation reporting helps you with that and sends you e-mail. When log or db gets full TSM will stop. //Henrik Norita binti Hassan To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]cc: (bcc: Henrik Wahlstedt) MY> Subject: Inquiry About TSM Database Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] RIST.EDU> 2005-05-09 05:34 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" How to estimete % of incremental in my database so that I can do a prediction when to add new dbvol. What happen if the database is full? Thanks NORITA BINTI HASAN Senior Programmer Enterprise Systems Services Information Communication Tech.Div 6th Floor, Pos Malaysia Berhad 50670 Kuala Lumpur Tel : 03 - 22756638 Pos Malaysia Berhad is Malaysia's national postal company Visit us online at www.pos.com.my NOTICE This message may contain privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the addressee or authorised to receive this email, you must not use, copy, disclose or take any action based on this email. If you have received this email in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message. Pos Malaysia Berhad takes no responsibility for the contents of this email. --- The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.
Re: TSM 5.3 better on windows2000 or AIX
Hi Luc, I dont know about and white papers but I think many people on the list will answer AIX Well, I´m a Windows guy but I wont argue with I/0 on Win vs Aix... :p Does anyone at your shop know AIX or not, maintenance is bit easier if you know you OS etc. I saw your earlier postings about performance problem on Windows. But I didnt read anything about What and When things are too slow and give you performance problems. Can you give us more details?? It can save you from a time consuming export/import process if you change OS You should be able to at least handle 700GB of daily backups from 50 nodes on w2k3 server with 9 slow (DLT) drives. //Henrik Luc Beaudoin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU MCGILL.CA> cc: (bcc: Henrik Wahlstedt) Sent by: "ADSM: Subject: TSM 5.3 better on windows2000 or AIX Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] .EDU> 11.05.2005 15:53 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" Hi all I'm about to upgrade my TSM server (win2000)ver 5.2.0.2 ... Is there a white paper that compare the performance between TSM 5.3 on AIX , WIN2K or WIN2003 Or someone tested it ... Thanks Luc --- The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.
help with select from volumes and processes, pls.
Hello !
What I would like to get is a select like this below, but I would aslo like
to get some information if the listed volumes are in a process or session?
If that is possible, how do I do?
Select cast(volume_name as char(6)) as "Volume",
Cast(substr(stgpool_name,1,16) as char(16)) as "Storage Pool",
cast(pct_utilized as decimal(5,2)) as "% Util", cast(pct_reclaim as
decimal(5,2)) as "% Reclaim", cast(status as char(7)) as "Status",
cast(read_errors as char(5)) as "R_Err", cast(write_errors as char(5)) as
"W_Err", cast(access as char(11)) as "Access" from volumes where
devclass_name='DLTCLASS' and pct_utilized < 3 and status not in
('PENDING','EMPTY') and stgpool_name='9710COLLO' order by 5,3
Volume Storage Pool % Util % Reclaim Status R_Err
W_Err Access
-- --- - --- -
- ---
001674 9710COLLO 0.00 0.00 FILLING 0
0 READONLY
000693 9710COLLO 0.90 0.00 FILLING 0
1 READONLY
PROCESS_NUM: 281
PROCESS: Move Data
START_TIME: 2005-05-16 16:10:58.00
FILES_PROCESSED: 0
BYTES_PROCESSED: 0
STATUS: Volume 000693 (storage pool 9710COLLO), Target Pool
BACKUPPOOL2, Moved Files: 0, Moved Bytes: 0, Unreadable Files: 0,
Unreadable
Bytes: 0. Current Physical File (bytes): 862,821,567
Current input volume: 001682.
Tia
Henrik
---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you.
Re: Encryption
Hi Eric, Yes TSM can encrypt your data, both in 5.2 (des56) and 5.3 (aes 128). You add the lines in a client optionset or in dsm.opt. INCLUDE.ENCRYPT "c:\...\*" ENCRYPTKEY PROMPT or SAVE. Check the client manuals for more information. //Henrik "Jones, Eric J" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" 2005-05-25 03:32 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU cc: (bcc: Henrik Wahlstedt) Subject:Encryption Good Evening. Running TSM 5.2.2 on AIX 5.2 Clients are a mix ofSolaris 7,8,9 AIX 4.2, AIX 5.2, Windows NT, Windows 2000 and Windows 2003 most running TSM 5.2.2. I've been reading the forums and was thinking I would probably not have to worry about this until now. I was asked to check and see what it would take to encrypt our data. I have 2 questions. 1: Is it a problem to use an encryption device to encrypt the data before it is sent to the TSM server?I know I would have to have the encryption key to restore the data but I was wondering if there were any problems that I would face. 2: Can TSM encrypt the data? I've read 1 article that indicated it was in TSM 5.3 but I did not see much on 5.2.2 which we are running. Are there any potential problems with using TSM to encrypt if it is possible? I know if you loose the key your done but other than that. Thanks for all the help, Eric
Upgrade to 5.2.4.3 on Windows2000
Hello, Only by curiosity Why does TSM server installation require .Net framework which require that the Remote Registry services to be started? I havent heard about any relations between TSM and .Net. I got the following error message when I upgraded TSM fron 5.2.2.5 to 5.2.4.3. "The Remote Registry Service is required for installation on Windows .Net (64bit)". I think I should say 32bit.. Anyway the upgrade went OK after I started the service. . .. And now most people will say... check your .Net installation... :-) //Henrik
Re: reclamation tape predicting
You can try something like this, (depending on your reclamation threshold...). select volume_name,stgpool_name,location,pct_utilized,pct_reclaim from volumes where pct_reclaim>70 order by pct_reclaim desc //Henrik -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Zarnoch Sent: 7. juni 2005 15:56 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: reclamation tape predicting Oh mighty gurus. We have had to relocate some of our tapes to an "overflow location" because of our silo capacity. I basically mark them as "unavailable" and "shelf". When reclamation starts, I redefine some of the tapes to "readw" and wait to see if TSM calls for them. I then have to physically insert them into the silo for each request. Is there anyway to query TSM to generate a list of tapes that it will require for reclamation? That way, I can redefine just those tapes and load them all at once into the library. Thanks! DaveZ --- The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.
Select from sessions??
Hi, If I do a Q Se I see how many bytes sent/received a node has in it´s current scheduled backup so far. At the end I get stats from the client but I cant find any information about how many bytes that were sent to the client. Is there a way to get this information? Accounting record? When I do a select againts session table I only get information about current sessions Information about sessions that just ended seconds ago are gone... select start_time, bytes_sent, bytes_received, wait_seconds, client_name from sessions where start_time >current_timestamp - 3 hours What I want: To see how much trafic a node generates during backup. Tia Henrik --- The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.
Re: Select from sessions??
Hi and thanks, But isnt bytes in summary refering to the number of bytes backuped? And not Total bytes sent To (from server) and From the client? //Henrik -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cory Heikel Sent: 7. juni 2005 17:58 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: Select from sessions?? Henrik, To find this information look in the summary table. select bytes from summary where activity='BACKUP' and entity=nodename *E-Mail Confidentiality Notice* This message (including any attachments) contains information intended for a specific individual(s) and purpose that may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure pursuant to applicable law. Any inappropriate use, distribution or copying of the message is strictly prohibited and may subject you to criminal or civil penalty. If you have received this transmission in error, please reply to the sender indicating this error and delete the transmission from your system immediately. >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/07/05 11:51 AM >>> Hi, If I do a Q Se I see how many bytes sent/received a node has in it´s current scheduled backup so far. At the end I get stats from the client but I cant find any information about how many bytes that were sent to the client. Is there a way to get this information? Accounting record? When I do a select againts session table I only get information about current sessions Information about sessions that just ended seconds ago are gone... select start_time, bytes_sent, bytes_received, wait_seconds, client_name from sessions where start_time >current_timestamp - 3 hours What I want: To see how much trafic a node generates during backup. Tia Henrik --- The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message. Thank you. --- The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.
Primary recovery media = disk?
Hi !! Do you have any hints in setting up an enviroment that uses disk as a primary recovery media. And tapes to store historical data and as offsite media? >From my understanding I can use weekly image backups (almost as fun as selective...), daily incremental backups and have a migration delay for 7 days on my storage pools. Is there any other way to store all active files on disk, (devt=file)? It is a mixed enviroment with both Windows and Unix (AIX, Linux, SUN etc). TIA Henrik --- The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.
Re: TSM DB unload
Hi, Yes, since the unload will re-org and shrink the database I always use disk, devt=file, when I do an unload/load DB. My DB backup to disk is 26GB, an unload DB is 16GB. Mostly I do this drill (test all utilities on my DB) in upgrade times on a test server, hardly never on my production server.. //Henrik -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lawrence Clark Sent: den 13 juni 2005 15:36 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: TSM DB unload Each day we do a TSM DB backup to disk: backup db devclass=adsmdbbk type=full We want to do a DB unload and load off hours since this has never been performed. Questions: If the backup db will fit on the disk devclass created for that purpose, will the unload also? Can we use the TSM disk devclass to store the unload? The manual examples all use tape media... ADSMDBBK Sequential 0FILE DRIVE 9,216.0 1 tsm: BACKUP>q db Available Assigned Maximum MaximumPage Total Used Pct Max. Space Capacity Extension ReductionSizeUsable Pages Util Pct (MB) (MB) (MB) (MB) (bytes) Pages Util - - - --- - - - - 16,628 14,668 1,960 1,076 4,096 3,755,008 3,146,986 83.8 83.8 --- The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.
Re: TSM DB unload
No, I use the same deviceclass. I dont know how much smaller it will get before it is unloaded. Even if there are some selects that will help me calculate wasted space. //Henrik -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lawrence Clark Sent: den 13 juni 2005 16:06 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: TSM DB unload Your area to unload is smaller than your area to backup the database? >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/13/2005 9:54:57 AM >>> Hi, Yes, since the unload will re-org and shrink the database. I always use disk, devt=file, when I do an unload/load DB. My DB backup to disk is 26GB, an unload DB is 16GB. Mostly I do this drill (test all utilities on my DB) in upgrade times on a test server, hardly never on my production server.. //Henrik -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lawrence Clark Sent: den 13 juni 2005 15:36 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: TSM DB unload Each day we do a TSM DB backup to disk: backup db devclass=adsmdbbk type=full We want to do a DB unload and load off hours since this has never been performed. Questions: If the backup db will fit on the disk devclass created for that purpose, will the unload also? Can we use the TSM disk devclass to store the unload? The manual examples all use tape media... ADSMDBBK Sequential 0FILE DRIVE 9,216.0 1 tsm: BACKUP>q db Available Assigned Maximum MaximumPage Total Used Pct Max. Space Capacity Extension ReductionSizeUsable Pages Util Pct (MB) (MB) (MB) (MB) (bytes) Pages Util - - - --- - - - - 16,628 14,668 1,960 1,076 4,096 3,755,008 3,146,986 83.8 83.8 --- The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message. Thank you. --- The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.
Re: Volume not available?
I agree. And a restart of TSM as Bob suggested can also solve the problem. Yesterday i got this message 'ANR8442E CHECKOUT LIBVOLUME: Volume 000141 in library STK9710 is currently in use.' There were no processes, mounts or sessions but I still couldn´t checkout my volume before i restarted TSM? Annoying.. I know TSM have problems with canceling sessions/processes which tends to pend a long time, but they still show up in actlog, or? Besides that, how can I audit a volume if i cant mount it? //Henrik Jim Taylor cc: (bcc: Henrik Wahlstedt) Sent by: Subject: Re: Volume not available? "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] RIST.EDU> 2002-11-05 21:55 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" I have seen this happen once (long time ago) I did not get an answer from IBM as to what caused the problem. However the following steps did fix the problem: 1. check the tape out of the library with remove=no option. 2. Open up the library and put the tape in the recovery slot. 3. Check the tape back into the library. I just checked my notes. The only reason that the tape was checked out with the remove=no option was that a regular checkout failed. I do not have anything in my notes as to why we put the tape in the recovery slot vs. the I/O station. I hope this helps in your situation. Jim -Original Message- From: David E Ehresman [mailto:deehre01@;LOUISVILLE.EDU] Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 3:29 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Volume not available? I'm getting "ANR1229W Volume 700270 cannot be backed up - volume is offline or access mode is "unavailable" or "destroyed" " messages for a volume. A "q libvol 3494 700270" reports the volume is in the library. A "q vol 700270 f=d" reports access=read/write and status=filling. The tape is not already mounted on a drive when the error occus. So in what sense is this tape unavailable or destroyed and how do I convince TSM to use the tape. David --- The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.
Re: recovery log mode
Do a 'q stat' from command line. The web gui doesnt always update all shown
information even if your update is accepted by the system/server.
//Henrik
"Mire, Nona"
cc: (bcc: Henrik Wahlstedt)
Sent by: Subject: recovery log mode
"ADSM: Dist
Stor Manager"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RIST.EDU>
2002-11-12
22:30
Please
respond to
"ADSM: Dist
Stor Manager"
We did an upgrade last week and I want to make sure my recovery log is set
to rollforward and I can't find it to verify. The only option I see is to
set the recovery log mode and when I bring this option up in gui it brings
it up with the normal button marked - I've changed it to rollforward but it
still brings it up with normal - so I think it's just a command with a
default of normal set.
Is there a command that I can run that will show me the current mode of the
recovery log.
AIX 5.1 TSM 4.2.1.9
Thanks
---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you.
Re: How to call 'archive' from an AT-Job in Win2000
Why dont you use client scheduler and define a scheduled command from tsm server? //Henrik Heinrichs Gerhard cc: (bcc: Henrik Wahlstedt) Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Subject: How to call 'archive' from an AT-Job in Win2000 Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2002-11-15 11:34 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" Hi *SM'ers, I would like some advices on following problem: How can I post an archive-command using an at-Job. My first idea was to use the cmd-interface and then an cd to the tsm-client-folder, but it doesnt work (ANS0101E.. unable to open Message repository). thanks Gerhard Gerhard Heinrichs is:energy GmbH OPOD Datenbankadministration Nymphenburgerstr. 39 80635 München T +49 89 1254-3411 F +49 89 1254-3090 M [EMAIL PROTECTED] W www.is-energy.de --- The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.
Re: delete filespace
Hi! After a 'del fi' the files are removed immediatly. But you have to reclaim the space in your storage pools, upd stg xxx reclaim=50 or whatever % you prefer. //Henrik Michelle DeVault To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: delete filespace Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] RIST.EDU> 2002-12-10 21:59 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" After doing a delete filespace, when do the deleted files get removed from the storage pools? After an expire inventory? __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com --- The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.
timeout value for processes
Hi all! Is there a server option or a another why to specify for how long a process will be active? Example, If all drives are busy I might not want reclamation to be pending for hours until two drive becomes available. Med vänlig hälsning Henrik Wahlstedt Statoil Phone: +46 8 429 6325 IT EH SE Torkel Knutssonsgatan 24 Mobile: +46 70 429 6325 118 88 Stockholm E-mail: Sverige [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.
Re: timeout value for processes
But that does not apply to automated libraries. I use TSM 4.1.3.0 on w2k and a STK9710 library with 6 DLT drives. tia Henrik Raghu S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MDS.CO.IN> cc: (bcc: Henrik Wahlstedt) Sent by: "ADSM: Subject: Re: timeout value for processes Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] T.EDU> 2002-12-18 09:58 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" mountwait parameter in devclass definition regds Raghu Henrik WahlstedtTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: timeout value for processes Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] RIST.EDU> 12/18/2002 01:33 PM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" Hi all! Is there a server option or a another why to specify for how long a process will be active? Example, If all drives are busy I might not want reclamation to be pending for hours until two drive becomes available. Med vänlig hälsning Henrik Wahlstedt Statoil Phone: +46 8 429 6325 IT EH SE Torkel Knutssonsgatan 24 Mobile: +46 70 429 6325 118 88 Stockholm E-mail: Sverige [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message. Thank you. --- The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.
Re: timeout value for processes
OK, I only used 'help upd devc' and looked at DLT.
MOUNTWait
Specifies the maximum number of minutes to wait for a sequential
access
volume to be mounted in a manual library. This parameter is optional
and does not apply to automated libraries. If the mount request is not
satisfied within the specified amount of time, the mount request is
canceled. You can specify a number from 0 to .
If it works its OK, but I had to ask.
//Henrik
John Naylor
cc: (bcc: Henrik Wahlstedt)
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Subject: Re: timeout value
for processes
Manager"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
2002-12-18 10:11
Please respond to "ADSM:
Dist Stor Manager"
Never heard that mountwait does not apply to automated libraries, I have 2
STK
automated
libraries and mountwait does what it is supposed to.
Henrik Wahlstedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 12/18/2002 09:06:58 AM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: John Naylor/HAV/SSE)
Subject: Re: timeout value for processes
**
The information in this E-Mail is confidential and may be legally
privileged. It may not represent the views of Scottish and Southern
Energy plc.
It is intended solely for the addressees. Access to this E-Mail by
anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient,
any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted
to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.
Any unauthorised recipient should advise the sender immediately of
the error in transmission.
Scottish Hydro-Electric, Southern Electric, SWALEC and S+S
are trading names of the Scottish and Southern Energy Group.
**
But that does not apply to automated libraries.
I use TSM 4.1.3.0 on w2k and a STK9710 library with 6 DLT drives.
tia
Henrik
Raghu S
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MDS.CO.IN> cc: (bcc: Henrik Wahlstedt)
Sent by: "ADSM: Subject: Re: timeout value
for
processes
Dist Stor
Manager"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
T.EDU>
2002-12-18 09:58
Please respond
to "ADSM: Dist
Stor Manager"
mountwait parameter in devclass definition
regds
Raghu
Henrik
WahlstedtTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: timeout value for
processes
Sent by:
"ADSM: Dist
Stor Manager"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RIST.EDU>
12/18/2002
01:33 PM
Please
respond to
"ADSM: Dist
Stor Manager"
Hi all!
Is there a server option or a another why to specify for how long a process
will be active?
Example, If all drives are busy I might not want reclamation to be pending
for hours until two drive becomes available.
Med vänlig hälsning
Henrik Wahlstedt Statoil
Re: Database page size?
Can you change it? I have 4096 bytes. Med vänlig hälsning Henrik Wahlstedt Statoil Phone: +46 8 429 6325 IT EH SE Torkel Knutssonsgatan 24 Mobile: +46 70 429 6325 118 88 Stockholm E-mail: Sverige [EMAIL PROTECTED] Farren Minns cc: (bcc: Henrik Wahlstedt) Sent by: Subject: Database page size? "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] RIST.EDU> 2003-01-16 11:37 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" Hi TSMers What is the default size of a page within the database? Thanks Farren - John Wiley & Sons Ltd --- The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.
Re: cancel process problem
Try to update access to offsite for the volume. It shouldn´t have READO if it´s OFFSITE. //Henrik Joni Moyer cc: (bcc: Henrik Wahlstedt) Sent by: "ADSM:Subject: Re: cancel process problem Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] ST.EDU> 2003-01-16 14:23 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" Here is what it is trying to do with the tape: 693 Backup Storage Pool Primary Pool TAPEDEC, Copy Pool DRCOPYDEC, Files Backed Up: 0, Bytes Backed Up: 0, Unreadable Files: 0, Unreadable Bytes: 0. Current Physical File (bytes): 12,909,748 Waiting for mount of output volume 473257 (20659 seconds). This tape is not onsite. It is actually an offsite tape that is empty. I have tried to cancel the backup of the storage pool and it will not let it go... I've tried everything I can think of. Any suggestions? Joni Moyer Systems Programmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] (717)975-8338 Daniel Sparrman cc: Sent by: "ADSM:Subject: Re: cancel process problem Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] T.EDU> 01/16/2003 08:16 AM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" Hi I haven't seen your script, but are you sure this is not an off-site copypool volume, that the DRM process wants back to the library to convert it to a scratch volume? The volume has problably been reclaimed, and therefore, the script, that probably runs somekind of DMR procedure, wants you to return the empty tape to the library. Best Regards Daniel Sparrman --- Daniel Sparrman Exist i Stockholm AB Propellervägen 6B 183 62 HÄGERNÄS Växel: 08 - 754 98 00 Mobil: 070 - 399 27 51 Joni Moyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2003-01-16 14:12 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:cancel process problem Hi again everyone! I have an administrative job running that is copying the onsite tape pool to the offsite tapepool. For some bizarre reason it is asking for a volume that is offsite. Volume Name: 473257 Storage Pool Name: DRCOPYDEC Device Class Name: T3590DR Estimated Capacity (MB): 0.0 Pct Util: 0.0 Volume Status: Empty Access: Read-Only Pct. Reclaimable Space: 0.0 Scratch Volume?: Yes In Error State?: No Number of Writable Sides: 1 Number of Times Mounted: 1 Write Pass Number: 0 Approx. Date Last Written: Approx. Date Last Read: Date Became Pending: Number of Write Errors: 0 Num
Re: database reorganisation
I´m not 100% sure, but If maxium reduction size is less than (assigned capacity of your db - substrakt (assigned capacity of your db * multiplied with pct. utilized)). It would indicate that you have some 'empty' space in your db. Or after you have deleted large filespaces/nodes. I look forward to read all answers if I´m completly wrong :-) //Henrik Francois Chevallier cc: (bcc: Henrik Wahlstedt) Sent by: "ADSM:Subject: database reorganisation Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] DU> 2003-01-17 11:30 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" What are the best criteria to know if it's time to reorganize the tsm database (by unloaddb /loaddbb) Sincerly François Chevallier Parc Club du Moulin à Vent 33 av G Levy 69200 - Vénissieux - France tél : 04 37 90 40 56 --- The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.
Re: database reorganisation
Well well, so we actually dont have a criteria for unloading db´s? I agree more or less (not necessarily buy new HW) with all responses so far. But I was trying to define a criteria in my first unclear answer. You dont have to unload your db, your TSM server will still run continuously. I´ve only done it twice in our production system and it went ok. It was installed summer -98 with a 30Gb db and an average of 150Gb daily backuped. Unload/load DB didnt look like rocket science to me. If I can manage to do an unload, everyone can. And if you make up a checklist and include Roger´s arguments. You will be fine.:-] 1 all TSM stuff - ok 2 sanity - not sure 3 high blood presure - ok 4 marriage - ok, I bought her a Cucci bag with the extra money i got.. //Henrik Mark StapletonTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: database reorganisation Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] RIST.EDU> 2003-01-20 21:21 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" On Fri, 2003-01-17 at 04:30, Francois Chevallier wrote: > What are the best criteria to know if it's time to reorganize the tsm > database (by unloaddb /loaddbb) It's almost *never* time to unload and load your TSM db. Most of those who have done so to "fix" a fragmented db discover that the system will go back to its original state in a matter of days or weeks. The real way to improve db performance is to place your db volumes on fast-access disk (SSA, etc.) -- Mark Stapleton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) --- The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.
Re: Submission of job through the TSM server
Assuming a backup job 'define clientaction 'NodeName' from admin cmdline,
(see help def clientact).
Which other types of jobs do you refer to?
//Henrik
Nicolas Savva
cc: (bcc: Henrik Wahlstedt)
Sent by: Subject: Submission of job through the
TSM server
"ADSM: Dist
Stor Manager"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RIST.EDU>
2003-01-23
11:11
Please
respond to
"ADSM: Dist
Stor Manager"
Hello guys
I am new on Tivoli Storage Manager. We are using TSM V5R1.
Does anybody know how can i submit mannually a job through the TSM server.
Nicolas Savva
Assistant System Specialist
Information Services
Laiki Group
11 Arch Makarios Ave.
CY-1065 Nicosia
CYPRUS
Tel +357 22812473 Fax +357 22812583
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web Site: http://www.laiki.com
Privileged/Confidential information may be contained in this message and
may be subject to legal privilege. Access to this e-mail by anyone other
than the intended recipient is unauthorised. If you are not the intended
recipient (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you
may not use, copy, distribute or deliver to anyone this message (or any
part of its contents) or take any action in reliance on it. In such case,
you should destroy this message, and notify us immediately.
If you have received this email in error, please notify us immediately by
e-mail or telephone and delete the e-mail from any computer. If you or your
employer does not consent to internet e-mail messages of this kind, please
notify us immediately.
All reasonable precautions have been taken to ensure no viruses are present
in this e-mail. As we cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage
arising from the use of this e-mail or attachments we recommend that you
subject these to your virus checking procedures prior to use.
The views, opinions, conclusions and other information expressed in this
electronic mail are not given or endorsed by Laiki Group unless otherwise
indicated by an authorised representative independent of this message.
---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you.
Re: Define Client Action command
Hi, It´s waiting for the scheduler service to refresh it´s stats. If scheduler service is running in polling mode (see dsm.opt) your schedule will kick off when it refresh it´s stats, you can set the timeintervals. If its prompted the server will contact your client right away and start the schedule. //Henrik Nicolas Savva cc: (bcc: Henrik Wahlstedt) Sent by: Subject: Define Client Action command "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] RIST.EDU> 2003-01-29 12:23 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" Hi to all, I am using the command DEFINE CLIENTACTION to schedule a client to process a command for a one-time action. Policy Domain Name: BWDOMAIN Schedule Name: @6 Action: COMMAND Option: - Objects: /home/db2inst/backupsample.sh Priority:1 Start date: 28/01/2003 Duration:5 Duration Units: DAYS Period:- Period Units: ONETIME Day of week: ANY Expire:- When i submit that command i receive the following: Policy Domain Name: BWDOMAIN Schedule Name: @6 Node name: SAP-BW Scheduled Start: 28/01/2003 12:00 Actual Start: Completed: Status: PENDING Result: Any ideas why is in PENDING status? Thanks in advance Nick Privileged/Confidential information may be contained in this message and may be subject to legal privilege. Access to this e-mail by anyone other than the intended recipient is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not use, copy, distribute or deliver to anyone this message (or any part of its contents) or take any action in reliance on it. In such case, you should destroy this message, and notify us immediately. If you have received this email in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail or telephone and delete the e-mail from any computer. If you or your employer does not consent to internet e-mail messages of this kind, please notify us immediately. All reasonable precautions have been taken to ensure no viruses are present in this e-mail. As we cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the use of this e-mail or attachments we recommend that you subject these to your virus checking procedures prior to use. The views, opinions, conclusions and other information expressed in this electronic mail are not given or endorsed by Laiki Group unless otherwise indicated by an authorised representative independent of this message. --- The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.
Re: TSM 5.2 Question
It´s nice to see a cat fight with two local (Swedish) consultants... Oops now its time for real work again... //Henrik Daniel Sparrman cc: (bcc: Henrik Wahlstedt) Sent by: "ADSM: Subject: Re: TSM 5.2 Question Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] T.EDU> 2003-02-13 14:14 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" Hi Christian 1. Does PC-BAX handle the TDP? Or does PC-BAX do its own, off-line backup of SQL, Exchange and so on? As far as I know, PC-BAX doesnt support restoring SQL and Exchange using Tivolis TDP. 2. I would really like to know who you have been talking to in Sweden regarding the NEW System Recovery tool? The ones I have talked to is recommending the product(as soon as it is relased, which wont happen, for Windows, within a couple of months). Best Regards Daniel Sparrman PS! Regarding Veritas, how do we know that Cristie isn't bought up by another large Storage software company? That would mean TSM support probably would disappear, as with the TKG Bare Metal Restore. --- Daniel Sparrman Exist i Stockholm AB Propellervägen 6B 183 62 HÄGERNÄS Växel: 08 - 754 98 00 Mobil: 070 - 399 27 51 Christian Svensson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: Subject: Re: TSM 5.2 Question 2003-02-13 14:08 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" Hi Everyone! What Tivoli has done and going to do is Unix : Sysback who everyone talk to is exakt the same who always have been there. The only thing who happend is that there is more documentation about it. That´s is the only who happend. Windows : Daniel talk about Sysback to Windows XP and Windows 2003 (.NET) and what Tivoli means about that is that the going to do a document who explain how the included Disaster Recovery (DR) tool work. But with the included DR tool do you not have support for Exchange, SQL, Citrix and et c. To get this program to work do you need to re-install them in a DR mode and after that use the TDP to restore the data. And in a Citrix cases do you need to restore all data and after that going in to a Recovery mode and repair the System Object (Registry). Tivoli in Scandinavia is not recommend this tools. And I haird that Tivoli in US has also looking around for new tools/ideas. If you need a BMR tool for Windows do we have one. And it´s also TSM Ready and Tivoli in Scandinavia
Re: Trouble - ASR on Win2003 - changed raid controller
Hi, What I used when I tested to do a restore to a different RAID controller was to use a slip streamed w2k3 installation CD where all HP drivers were included. I had no problems and it should work if you follow the steps in the ASR Redbook. HP DL380 G3, 5i Plus and 5312 controler. Backup 5i -> Restore 5i OK Backup 5i -> Restore 5312OK Backup 5312 -> Restore 5312OK Backup 5312 -> Restore 5i OK //Henrik -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gottfried Scheckenbach Sent: den 13 juni 2005 14:01 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Trouble - ASR on Win2003 - changed raid controller Hi all, does somebody know if asr recovery is possible in this case? ASR diskette and backupsets are ready! Do I have to change the asr disk to have the new driver included? >From my point of view: 1. Boot and Install from backupsets should be no problem because driver can be supplied in fist - nongraphics - boot phase 2. Boot of the installed System is the real problem because without changing the asr disk there is no driver to open the new raid controller Thanks, Gottfried --- The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.
Server to server communication
Hello, In AIX Installation Guide 5.3, http://publibfp.boulder.ibm.com/epubs/pdf/c3215970.pdf <http://publibfp.boulder.ibm.com/epubs/pdf/c3215970.pdf> , under Compatibility with Other Versions of IBM Tivoli Storage Manager it states that: "When upgrading multiple servers participating in server-to-server to Version 5.3, all servers must be upgraded at the same time.". We have 4 AIX TSM (5.1.9.3) servers that participate in server to server communication. Two main TSM servers hosts 2 or more TSM instances and each database is about 160GB. The two other TSM servers also host Content Manager and Common Store that needs to be upgraded at the same time as the TSM servers. Are we forced to upgrade everything at the same time to be in a supported configuration. Or does TSM support server to server communication between 5.1.9 <--> 5.3.1 or 5.3.2? Maybe I need to take a temporary step to 5.2.4 or 5.2.5 before I upgrade to 5.3.2? Regards, Henrik Med vänlig hälsning ____ Henrik Wahlstedt KTJ IT NED SE1 Statoil <http://www.statoil.se/> Torkel Knutssonsgatan 24 118 88 Stockholm Sverige Phone: +46 8 429 6325 Mobile: +46 70 429 6325 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.
Re: Web Admin GUI not working after upgrade: HELP!
Hi, Have you run 'dsmserv runfile dsmserv.idl' after the upgrade? If not do that and try the WEB gui again. //Henrik -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joni Moyer Sent: den 20 juni 2005 13:57 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Web Admin GUI not working after upgrade: HELP! Hey! Our TSM server was upgraded yesterday from 5.2.2.5 to 5.2.4 and now I cannot get to the web admin. Is there an extra piece that needs upgraded or changed? This is an AIX 5.2 platform server. Thanks in advance for any suggestions/ideas! Joni Moyer Highmark Storage Systems Work:(717)302-6603 Fax:(717)302-5974 [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.
Re: TSM DB stats not good
Hi again, I think your bufferpool pages are low, only 512?? Are you sure you are using the right dsmserv.opt? Available Space (MB): 121,856 Assigned Capacity (MB): 119,856 Maximum Extension (MB): 2,000 Maximum Reduction (MB): 6,240 Page Size (bytes): 4,096 Total Usable Pages: 30,683,136 Used Pages: 28,063,455 Pct Util: 91.5 Max. Pct Util: 91.6 Physical Volumes: 24 Buffer Pool Pages: 393,216 Total Buffer Requests: 1,563,470,178 Cache Hit Pct.: 98.17 Cache Wait Pct.: 0.00 Backup in Progress?: No Type of Backup In Progress: Incrementals Since Last Full: 0 Changed Since Last Backup (MB): 1641.87 Percentage Changed: 1.50 Last Complete Backup Date/Time: 06/20/2005 07:03:58 //Henrik -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joni Moyer Sent: den 20 juni 2005 14:01 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: TSM DB stats not good Hello, Our TSM server was upgraded to 5.2.4 on an AIX 5.2 server. I haven't changed any parameters and before the upgrade the cache hit pct was 99.95% As you can see it is now only 95.9. Is there some parameter that I should have changed that I am not aware of? Thanks! Available Space (MB): 40,960 Assigned Capacity (MB): 34,400 Maximum Extension (MB): 6,560 Maximum Reduction (MB): 13,104 Page Size (bytes): 4,096 Total Usable Pages: 8,806,400 Used Pages: 5,385,669 Pct Util: 61.2 Max. Pct Util: 61.2 Physical Volumes: 5 Buffer Pool Pages: 512 Total Buffer Requests: 525,272,608 Cache Hit Pct.: 95.90 Cache Wait Pct.: 0.00 Backup in Progress?: No Type of Backup In Progress: Incrementals Since Last Full: 0 Changed Since Last Backup (MB): 719.21 Percentage Changed: 3.42 Last Complete Backup Date/Time: 06/19/05 08:40:36 Joni Moyer Highmark Storage Systems Work:(717)302-6603 Fax:(717)302-5974 [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.
Re: TSM DB stats not good
It should reside in the server directory. I was just guessing that you original dsmserv.opt was replaced during the upgrade...? //Henrik -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joni Moyer Sent: den 20 juni 2005 14:21 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: TSM DB stats not good Hi, How can I tell which dsmserv.opt file the server is using when it is running? Thanks! Joni Moyer Highmark Storage Systems Work:(717)302-6603 Fax:(717)302-5974 [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Henrik Wahlstedt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] To > ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Sent by: "ADSM: cc Dist Stor Manager" Subject <[EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: TSM DB stats not good .EDU> 06/20/2005 08:07 AM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] .EDU> Hi again, I think your bufferpool pages are low, only 512?? Are you sure you are using the right dsmserv.opt? Available Space (MB): 121,856 Assigned Capacity (MB): 119,856 Maximum Extension (MB): 2,000 Maximum Reduction (MB): 6,240 Page Size (bytes): 4,096 Total Usable Pages: 30,683,136 Used Pages: 28,063,455 Pct Util: 91.5 Max. Pct Util: 91.6 Physical Volumes: 24 Buffer Pool Pages: 393,216 Total Buffer Requests: 1,563,470,178 Cache Hit Pct.: 98.17 Cache Wait Pct.: 0.00 Backup in Progress?: No Type of Backup In Progress: Incrementals Since Last Full: 0 Changed Since Last Backup (MB): 1641.87 Percentage Changed: 1.50 Last Complete Backup Date/Time: 06/20/2005 07:03:58 //Henrik -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joni Moyer Sent: den 20 juni 2005 14:01 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: TSM DB stats not good Hello, Our TSM server was upgraded to 5.2.4 on an AIX 5.2 server. I haven't changed any parameters and before the upgrade the cache hit pct was 99.95% As you can see it is now only 95.9. Is there some parameter that I should have changed that I am not aware of? Thanks! Available Space (MB): 40,960 Assigned Capacity (MB): 34,400 Maximum Extension (MB): 6,560 Maximum Reduction (MB): 13,104 Page Size (bytes): 4,096 Total Usable Pages: 8,806,400 Used Pages: 5,385,669 Pct Util: 61.2 Max. Pct Util: 61.2 Physical Volumes: 5 Buffer Pool Pages: 512 Total Buffer Requests: 525,272,608 Cache Hit Pct.: 95.90 Cache Wait Pct.: 0.00 Backup in Progress?: No Type of Backup In Progress: Incrementals Since Last Full: 0 Changed Since Last Backup (MB): 719.21 Percentage Changed: 3.42 Last Complete Backup Date/Time: 06/19/05 08:40:36 Joni Moyer Highmark Storage Systems Work:(717)302-6603 Fax:(717)302-5974 [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message. Thank you. --- The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.
Re: Backup
Hi, If speed/duplex settings are OK for NIC´s and switches and you can FTP some large files from/to Oracle and TSM servers with a reasonable speed. Then you have to monitor CPU, Disk I/O etc on both servers and switches... To find a pattern and track down the problem. //Henrik -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Akash Jain Sent: den 14 juli 2005 09:13 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: Backup Yeah they are also configured at same speed. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Scott, Mark William Sent: Thursday, 14 July 2005 11:59 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Backup Have you checked the switches though? -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Akash Jain Sent: Thursday, 14 July 2005 2:26 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: Backup Hi mark, Our all network interfaces are configured on 100 MBPS only. Media Speed Selected: 100 Mbps Full Duplex Media Speed Running: 100 Mbps Full Duplex Regards Akash -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Scott, Mark William Sent: Thursday, 14 July 2005 11:49 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Backup Hi Akash We have found if you are using 100mb network for example you have to ensure that all interfaces are set to the same speed etc eg: Host 100mb/Full switch port 100mb/Full and backup server 100mb/Full Hope this helps Cheers Mark -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Akash Jain Sent: Thursday, 14 July 2005 2:01 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Backup Hi all, I am in very strange situation where my Oracle backup sometimes completes in 1 hour and sometimes it took only 16 minutes for same data. On scrutinising the logs, it has been observed that it's the matter of network performance. Sometimes I am getting a speed of 1206kb/ps (data took 1 hour to backed up) and at 4506kb/ps completes in 16 minutes. I am assuming this is the network issue and to be checked by networking guys. Does anyone have faces this problem or any ideas about the same? AIX - 4.3.3.11 Data - Oracle Files Backup Software : TSM Regards Akash Jain --- The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.
