If there’ a pull request to get it into the current “develop” branch of
opendmarc, I have the privs to merge it.
-Dan
> On Mar 8, 2023, at 11:14 AM, Peter Ajamian via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> On 9/03/23 08:11, Peter wrote:
>> On 8/03/23 15:46, Scott Kitterman via Postfix-users wrote:
>>> Fo
I know that P-U stands for postfix users. I get it that a short subject tag
was desired, but would [postfix] have been that much more distracting, without
adding the obvious third-grader label that might better be held by qmail?
-Dan
___
Postfix-users
> On Mar 10, 2023, at 10:59 AM, Ralph Seichter via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> * Jim Popovitch via Postfix-users:
>
>> On Fri, 2023-03-10 at 17:35 +0200, mailmary--- via Postfix-users wrote:
>>
>>> Looking at the opendkim/opendmarc right now, they appear dead over
>>> the past 2 years or so,
Hey there all,
I am one of the people who has maintainer access to OpenDKIM and OpenDMARC. I
use both regularly, but I’m also a novice as a C-coder. (Sysadmin, not
developer). As mentioned in another thread, I don’t have access to the web
hosting stuff or the list management stuff, though I’
All,
We have our aliases file pushing things into our RT install, but also saving
things to a maildir, so we can manually feed a single file back in, thusly:
In /etc/aliases:
noc:"|/usr/local/sbin/rtmailgate ops noc cor",
"/root/ops/Ma
> On Jul 6, 2023, at 6:40 AM, Jaroslaw Rafa via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> Dnia 6.07.2023 o godz. 05:43:22 Dan Mahoney via Postfix-users pisze:
>> In /etc/aliases:
>>
>> noc:"|/usr/local/sbin/rtmailgate ops noc cor",
>
> On Aug 5, 2023, at 6:46 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> On 05.08.23 00:35, Charles Sprickman via Postfix-users wrote:
>> Just following up to myself here, but this Dell POS just bails if it can't
>> do TLS, lol:
>>
>> Aug 5 00:30:52 mail postfix/smtpd[76663]: < u
All,
Pretty simple question:
We have an internal domain, zimbra.example.org, but it's only used for internal
routing of our corporate mail (there's a master delivery map that controls what
addresses at example.org route to zimbra.example.org). We have other domains
under example.org such as l
> On Mar 6, 2024, at 16:52, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> Alex via Postfix-users:
>> Hi,
>> I have a few postfix systems on fedora38 with nearly identical
>> configurations. I'd like to be able to push changes to them from a third
>> system without having to login to them direct
Hey there all,
I’m setting up a staging version of dayjob’s ticket system, and we’d basically
like postfix to still function, but instead of touching the internet at all,
just deliver everything to a single file (or a maildir, I suppose), regardless
of if a file is invoked via sendmail, or a po
> On Apr 2, 2024, at 10:52, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 04:14:29AM -0400, Dan Mahoney via Postfix-users wrote:
>> Hey there all,
>>
>> I’m setting up a staging version of dayjob’s ticket system, and we’d
>> basi
> On Apr 11, 2024, at 08:35, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 11:39:24PM -0400, Dan Mahoney via Postfix-users wrote:
>
>>> On Apr 2, 2024, at 10:52, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
>>> mailto:postfix-users@postfix.org
Hello,
We currently have myorigin = $mydomain, and mydomain = dayjob.org on one of our
border MXes, which is also the outbound MX for our whole organization. We are
a fairly large site with mxes in two locations and many machines which send
mail which may relay through here. Mydomain feels li
> On Jun 15, 2024, at 06:19, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> Dan Mahoney via Postfix-users:
>> Hello,
>>
>> We currently have myorigin = $mydomain, and mydomain = dayjob.org
>> on one of our border MXes, which is also the outbound MX for
> On Jun 15, 2024, at 15:03, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> One addendum about how to distinguish from root@mydomain
> from different hosts.
>
> Dan Mahoney via Postfix-users:
>>> Use a virtual alias mapping from "r...@dayjob.org" to the
All,
This is the most minor problem, but I’ll bring it up.
We use Lets Encrypt for our certs (using the Dehydrated client), and call a
“postfix reload” as part of the hook script if a cert has been renewed.
We also wrapper this with ‘cronic’ which works not under the old cron principle
that “a
I know Viktor routiinely scans for TLSA signatures (and pokes folks if we get
it wrong).
I’d like to turn this into a check in our internal monitoring, since we do
occasionally roll the cert on our MXes (which need to be “real” OV certs due to
some customer requirements — I don’t make the rul
> On Feb 10, 2025, at 01:59, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 12:22:44AM -0800, Dan Mahoney via Postfix-users wrote:
>
>> I’d like to turn this into a check in our internal monitoring, since we
>> do occasionally roll the cert
If any of those mailing lists are open, regular lists that I could be
subscribed to, for testing, I’d be happy to try to do so to validate this for
you.
-Dan
> On May 9, 2025, at 21:07, Nick Tait via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> On 10/05/2025 15:29, Nick Tait via Postfix-users wrote:
>> But of
Mime-version was listed as a signed header but was absent.
I suspect his header checks cleaned that out.
Note that having a header listed in the H equals list, but having that header
be absent is legal, but I don’t know why the signing software would say it’s
signing that header when it’s not t
There’s only one certificate in your chain, you need to send the intermediate
cert as well.
The cert you’re signing with isn’t trusted by browsers.
Certificate chain
0 s:CN = rollcage13.aboc.net.au
i:C = US, O = Let's Encrypt, CN = R10
Arguably, this is even worse than being self-signed.
C
Nothing’s jumping out to me in your test message, other than that the
mime-version header field is missing, but that’s legal.
I might suggest trying the “Develop” branch of OpenDKIM from git, as there are
some changes in that which *may* fix things, or at least…give something to
compare. The e
> On May 20, 2025, at 07:43, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 08:26:37AM -0400, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
>>> We're in the process of trolling all our logs to figure out what we can
>>> ignore/filter/take action on, and we have a couple
Hey folks,
We're in the process of trolling all our logs to figure out what we can
ignore/filter/take action on, and we have a couple entries that I'm wondering
what's happening under the hood:
2025-05-18T15:42:07+00:00 post.dayjob.org postfix/smtpd [mail.warning] warning:
TLS library problem:
Hey there folks.
I’ve been debugging a faulty milter, which was crashing due to one particular
malformed message. While trying to figure out how to get it to core (and
replace it with a build with debug symbols), I changed postfix to change the
default milter action to quarantine.
Ergo, my qu
25 matches
Mail list logo
