Hello,
I am trying this on 5.6-stable.
Is there a way to list all POLY1305/CHACHA20 based ciphers which are
enabled?
For example, if I try with RSA:
# openssl ciphers RSA
AES256-GCM-SHA384:AES256-SHA256:AES256-SHA:AES128-GCM-SHA256:AES128-SHA256:AES128-SHA:IDEA-CBC-SHA:RC4-SHA:RC4-MD5:DES-CBC3
Hello,
On 11/14/2014 09:04 AM, Renaud Allard wrote:
Hello,
I am trying this on 5.6-stable.
Is there a way to list all POLY1305/CHACHA20 based ciphers which are
enabled?
For example, if I try with RSA:
# openssl ciphers RSA
AES256-GCM-SHA384:AES256-SHA256:AES256-SHA:AES128-GCM-SHA256:AES128-SHA
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 10:04:16AM +0100, Renaud Allard wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 11/14/2014 09:04 AM, Renaud Allard wrote:
> >Hello,
> >
> >I am trying this on 5.6-stable.
> >Is there a way to list all POLY1305/CHACHA20 based ciphers which are
> >enabled?
> >
> >For example, if I try with RSA:
> >#
On 11/14/2014 10:12 AM, Jonathan Gray wrote:
Now openssl ciphers CHACHA20 works as intended
# openssl ciphers CHACHA20
ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305:ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305:DHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305
This is already present in rev 1.68/-current
http://cvsweb.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/l
Renaud Allard writes:
> On 11/14/2014 10:12 AM, Jonathan Gray wrote:
>>>
>>> Now openssl ciphers CHACHA20 works as intended
>>> # openssl ciphers CHACHA20
>>> ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305:ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305:DHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305
>>
>> This is already present in rev 1.68/-current
>>
On 11/14/2014 01:28 PM, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote:
Renaud Allard writes:
On 11/14/2014 10:12 AM, Jonathan Gray wrote:
Now openssl ciphers CHACHA20 works as intended
# openssl ciphers CHACHA20
ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305:ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305:DHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305
This is alr
Hello list,
I seem to have a little hardware related problem. I have been using a
Lenovo x120e for some time, and OpenBSD ran nicely on it until April. As
soon as I upgraded to 5.5, and from quite early after kernel loading,
the console started showing and repeating at regular intervals:
acp
On 11/14/14 13:27, Etienne wrote:
Hello list,
I seem to have a little hardware related problem. I have been using a
Lenovo x120e for some time, and OpenBSD ran nicely on it until April. As
soon as I upgraded to 5.5, and from quite early after kernel loading,
the console started showing and repea
Etienne wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> I seem to have a little hardware related problem. I have been using a
> Lenovo x120e for some time, and OpenBSD ran nicely on it until April. As
> soon as I upgraded to 5.5, and from quite early after kernel loading,
> the console started showing and repeating at
On 2014-11-14 18:27, Etienne wrote:
Hello list,
Sorry for answering to myself, that was my first post and I didn't
expect the attachements to be concatenated after my message. Please let
me reformat:
x100e# dmesg
OpenBSD 5.6 (GENERIC.MP) #333: Fri Aug 8 00:20:21 MDT 2014
dera...@amd64
Did a fan die? Or are you blocking the vent somehow?
I killed a laptop like that once by putting it on my lap. Turned out the
fan vent was on the bottom and the laptop needed to be on a flat surface.
Usually called a desk. So I don't know why it was classified as a laptop.
:)
Tim.
On 14/11/14 13:28, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote:
> Renaud Allard writes:
>
>> On 11/14/2014 10:12 AM, Jonathan Gray wrote:
Now openssl ciphers CHACHA20 works as intended
# openssl ciphers CHACHA20
ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305:ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305:DHE-RSA-CHACHA20-PO
LY1305
On 2014-11-14 18:56, Gregor Best wrote:
("93C" is just a typical value, I've seen any between 92 and 98). I
usually have just the time to log in before the system logs me out and
shuts down. This laptop normally runs at around 80??C, and I think the
temperature reading in OpenBSD is correct, bec
Hi,
On 11/14/14, Etienne wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> I seem to have a little hardware related problem. I have been using a
> Lenovo x120e for some time, and OpenBSD ran nicely on it until April. As
> soon as I upgraded to 5.5, and from quite early after kernel loading,
> the console started showing
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 11:59:26AM -0800, patrick keshishian wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 11/14/14, Etienne wrote:
> > Hello list,
> >
> > I seem to have a little hardware related problem. I have been using a
> > Lenovo x120e for some time, and OpenBSD ran nicely on it until April. As
> > soon as I upgrad
On 11/14/14, Mike Larkin wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 11:59:26AM -0800, patrick keshishian wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 11/14/14, Etienne wrote:
>> > Hello list,
>> >
>> > I seem to have a little hardware related problem. I have been using a
>> > Lenovo x120e for some time, and OpenBSD ran nicely o
Hello,
I very much believe the OpenBSD is important and needs support. I am not a
programmer, and I do not have money to donate. What other ways are there to
contribute?
I remember the website used to list ways to contribute in various ways, but
I can only seem to find monetary donations on the w
If you are fluent in two or more languages you might be able to help
out with translations. Bug-hunting (with proper reporting habits!) is
always appreciated too.
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 6:33 PM, Jeremy wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I very much believe the OpenBSD is important and needs support. I am not a
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 18:37, ian kremlin wrote:
> If you are fluent in two or more languages you might be able to help
> out with translations. Bug-hunting (with proper reporting habits!) is
> always appreciated too.
I think the translation effort is dead. Better to help out by teaching
English
> On Nov 14, 2014, at 4:24 PM, Ted Unangst wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 18:37, ian kremlin wrote:
>> If you are fluent in two or more languages you might be able to help
>> out with translations. Bug-hunting (with proper reporting habits!) is
>> always appreciated too.
>
> I think the tra
Hi all,
I believe this is one of those i think the answer is no, but need to ask
situations.
Weve built out an L2TP/IPSEC environment whose goal is to provide VDI access
to
subsidiaries and support client connections from MacOS, Windows, Unix,
Linux,
et all.
For MacOS and *nix, client connec
Is there any reason to not use iked and skip the whole L2TP bit?
I've found the built in Windows ikev2 VPN to work better then the older
L2TP.
On 11/10/14, 2:46 PM, Peter Hessler wrote:
> As I said before.
>
> _This_ _Is_ _Not_ _Possible_.
>
> Period.
>
>
Wellif you're doing bridging on the Linux setup you're trying to
replace, but don't realize it, forget to mention that the Cisco actually
*does* have an address in the /29 the Free/O
23 matches
Mail list logo
