Hi,
I have added a wiki page which described how to modify your snowball
to do more precise power measurements
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/PowerManagement/Doc/Power_snowball
Regards,
Vincent
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linar
Detailed dashboard:
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/Middleware/Multimedia/WeeklyReport
Last meeting minutes:
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/Middleware/Multimedia/Notes/2011-12-13
Highlights:
- Moving on with the release for realvideo end-to-end audio testing
(basic prototype), speex
Hi Tony,
On 12/15/2011 7:52 AM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
On Thursday 15 December 2011 12:55 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Rajendra Nayak [111214 03:24]:
Pass minimal data needed for console boot, from dt, for
OMAP4 panda/sdp and OMAP3 beagle boards, and get rid of the
static initialization from gene
Hi Nicolas,
It seems as though some of my perf patches have ended up in the Linaro
kernel source but the fixes that I've pushed during the -rc haven't made
it:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linaro-landing-team-freescale/+bug/893653
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-linaro-omap/+bug/84
This subject came up on debian-arm:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-arm/2011/12/msg00025.html
And it seems like the sort of architectural issue linaro should take
an interest in fixing to avoid making people's lives difficult when
building on arm. Is it on anyone's list already?
In short:
A C ap
On 15 December 2011 13:06, Tom Gall wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm trying to push some code to my repo on git.linaro.org and it's
> like the repo is silently failing Note the following:
I know Canonical IS are doing some rearrangements of Linaro git
hosting today to make it faster and more reliable. I
On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 20:21 +0100, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> With a lot of small tasks, the softirq sched is nearly never called
> when no_hz is enable. In this case the load_balance is mainly called with
> the newly_idle mode which doesn't update the cpu_power.
> Add a next_update field which ensur
Signed-off-by: Richard Zhao
---
arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig
index c44aa97..39cf00a 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig
@@ -595,6 +595,7 @
It support single core and multi-core ARM SoCs. But it assume
all cores share the same frequency and voltage.
Signed-off-by: Richard Zhao
---
drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm |8 ++
drivers/cpufreq/Makefile |1 +
drivers/cpufreq/arm-cpufreq.c | 260
cpufreq needs cpu clock to change frequency.
Signed-off-by: Richard Zhao
---
arch/arm/mach-imx/clock-imx6q.c |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/clock-imx6q.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/clock-imx6q.c
index 039a7ab..72acbc2 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mac
Signed-off-by: Richard Zhao
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q.dtsi |2 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q.dtsi
index 263e8f3..9e9943b 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q.dtsi
@@
TODO:
- add voltage change.
Thanks
Richard
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
Hi Richard,
Whenever we invent some new device tree binding support, we need to
Cc devicetree-disc...@lists.ozlabs.org (Cc-ed).
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 07:16:36PM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Richard Zhao
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q.dtsi |2 ++
> 1 files changed, 2 insert
Detailed dashboard:
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/Middleware/Graphics/WeeklyReport
Last weekly meeting minutes
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/Middleware/Graphics/Notes/2011-12-14
Highlights:
- bug #855524 was fixed, so glproxy can now be enabled for glcompbench
- glmark2: added liv
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/14/2011 05:02 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Daniel Lezcano
> wrote:
>
>> while trying the linux-next at the point it boots (commit
>> be9b7335e70696bee731c152429b1737e42fe163, after v3.2-rc4), I noticed the
>> time
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Daniel Lezcano
wrote:
> [Me]
>>> It is easy to reproduce with 'time sleep 1' where the timer expires 1, 2
>>> or 3 seconds later.
>>>
>>> It seems that does not happen with linux-linaro-3.1 but I was able to
>>> reproduce the problem on a vanilla kernel 3.1.5.
>>>
On 15 December 2011 13:06, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Daniel Lezcano
> wrote:
>> [Me]
It is easy to reproduce with 'time sleep 1' where the timer expires 1, 2
or 3 seconds later.
It seems that does not happen with linux-linaro-3.1 but I was able to
On 15/12/11 13:52, Ilias Biris wrote:
> - glmark2: added live FPS counter on the screen (enabled via commandline
> option)
Clarification: the FPS counter is not going to be in the 11.12 release.
It exists as a branch of glmark2 code. It should be ready for 12.01,
taking the time to test and improv
Reported-by: Mark Brown
Signed-off-by: David Dajun Chen
Signed-off-by: Ashish Jangam
---
drivers/regulator/da9052-regulator.c | 16 +++-
1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/da9052-regulator.c
b/drivers/regulator/da9052-regulator.c
inde
On 15 December 2011 11:08, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 20:21 +0100, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>> With a lot of small tasks, the softirq sched is nearly never called
>> when no_hz is enable. In this case the load_balance is mainly called with
>> the newly_idle mode which doesn't upda
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/15/2011 02:06 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Daniel Lezcano
> wrote:
>> [Me]
It is easy to reproduce with 'time sleep 1' where the timer expires 1, 2
or 3 seconds later.
It seems that does not hap
On Thu, 15 Dec 2011, Will Deacon wrote:
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> It seems as though some of my perf patches have ended up in the Linaro
> kernel source but the fixes that I've pushed during the -rc haven't made
> it:
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/linaro-landing-team-freescale/+bug/893653
>
> https://
On Thu, 15 Dec 2011, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Dec 2011, Will Deacon wrote:
>
> > Rather than me point each landing team at the patches, would you be able
> > to cherry-pick the fixes from mainline please? They are:
> >
> > bce34d14 ("ARM: perf: initialise used_mask for fake PMU during v
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 02:27:46PM +, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Dec 2011, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 15 Dec 2011, Will Deacon wrote:
> >
> > > Rather than me point each landing team at the patches, would you be able
> > > to cherry-pick the fixes from mainline please? They are
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Vincent Guittot
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have added a wiki page which described how to modify your snowball
> to do more precise power measurements
>
> https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/PowerManagement/Doc/Power_snowball
>
Very cool Vincent. Now I hope we get someth
> - Since CMA lava-test is very long (around 2 hours) and there is only
> one snowball on test farm, the CMA testing blueprint could be put on
> hold.
We can get more snowballs into the farm in short order if need be.
We're looking at another order of V11s.
___
On 15 December 2011 17:35, Joey STANFORD wrote:
>> - Since CMA lava-test is very long (around 2 hours) and there is only
>> one snowball on test farm, the CMA testing blueprint could be put on
>> hold.
>
> We can get more snowballs into the farm in short order if need be.
> We're looking at anothe
This week, a kind of rebuild for precise pangolin in the disguise of the armhf
bootstrap did end. The build did expose some ARM unspecific build failures;
please use the information from the armhf build logs to address these build
failures. Please use the ftbfs pages to gather more information:
Wookey wrote:
> We can
> 1) Change every app in the world that defines a 'struct user'
> 2) Stop these headers getting brought in when not actually needed
> (it's a relatively recent change that brings it in)
> 3) Change the name in glibc/GDB to something less likely to clash
Some background fro
Comments below. I tested this on the Calxeda Highbank SoC using
QEMU. I found one definite error and a few things I would change.
On 12/15/2011 05:16 AM, Richard Zhao wrote:
It support single core and multi-core ARM SoCs. But it assume
all cores share the same frequency and voltage.
Signed-off-
Frans,
Paul Sokolovsky has some details about an issue we're running into
passing builds to LAVA from android-build with our new proprietary
binaries?
Paul would you tell Frans about it?
--
Zach Pfeffer
Android Platform Team Lead, Linaro Platform Teams
Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM
On 12/15/2011 05:16 AM, Richard Zhao wrote:
Signed-off-by: Richard Zhao
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q.dtsi |2 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q.dtsi
index 263e8f3..9e9943b 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/i
On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 14:06 +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Daniel Lezcano
> wrote:
> > [Me]
> >>> It is easy to reproduce with 'time sleep 1' where the timer expires 1, 2
> >>> or 3 seconds later.
> >>>
> >>> It seems that does not happen with linux-linaro-3.1 but I
On 15 December 2011 06:27, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Dec 2011, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 15 Dec 2011, Will Deacon wrote:
>>
>> > Rather than me point each landing team at the patches, would you be able
>> > to cherry-pick the fixes from mainline please? They are:
>> >
>> > bce34d14
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 07:16:35PM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote:
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> + /* loops_per_jiffy is not updated by the cpufreq core for SMP systems.
> + * So update it for all CPUs.
> + */
> + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
> + per_cpu(cpu_data, cpu).loops_per_jif
* Cousson, Benoit [111215 01:34]:
> Hi Tony,
>
> On 12/15/2011 7:52 AM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> >On Thursday 15 December 2011 12:55 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> >>* Rajendra Nayak [111214 03:24]:
> >>>Pass minimal data needed for console boot, from dt, for
> >>>OMAP4 panda/sdp and OMAP3 beagle boar
On 12/15/2011 10:13 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Cousson, Benoit [111215 01:34]:
Hi Tony,
On 12/15/2011 7:52 AM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
On Thursday 15 December 2011 12:55 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Rajendra Nayak [111214 03:24]:
Pass minimal data needed for console boot, from dt, for
OMAP4 pa
* Cousson, Benoit [111215 12:56]:
>
> Nit: The convention is without the 0x prefix.
OK will post an updated version as a reply to this
email.
> Beside that, that looks good top me. But I'll not be able to try it :-)
Boots fine with the following n8x0.dts patch. Currently
MMC of course won't m
Add minimal device tree support for omap2420 and omap2430
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap2.dtsi
@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
+/*
+ * Device Tree Source for OMAP2 SoC
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2011 Texas Instruments Incorporated - http://www.ti.com/
+ *
+ * This file is li
The Linaro Kernel Working Group (KWG) is excited to announce the
availability our December 2011 development snapshot:
linux-linaro-3.1-2011.12-1
As the word "snapshot" implies, these are meant as development kernels
and have not been fully validated. You should expect issues and to help
us delive
Amit,
i've started a wiki page with some of the basic information:
http://elinux.org/PandaBoard_Power_Measurements
Dave
On 12/15/2011 08:40 AM, Amit Kucheria wrote:
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Vincent Guittot
wrote:
Hi,
I have added a wiki page which described how to modify your
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 8:02 PM, john stultz wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 14:06 +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> It means that the kernel idea of sleep(1) is, sleep atleast 1 second,
>> possibly more. When the system scales down frequency, say to half
>> the frequency, things start to take twice t
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 07:58:54PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> Whenever we invent some new device tree binding support, we need to
> Cc devicetree-disc...@lists.ozlabs.org (Cc-ed).
Thanks for your reminder.
>
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 07:16:36PM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote:
> > Signed
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 12:50:07PM -0600, Mark Langsdorf wrote:
> Comments below. I tested this on the Calxeda Highbank SoC using
> QEMU. I found one definite error and a few things I would change.
Thanks for your test.
>
> On 12/15/2011 05:16 AM, Richard Zhao wrote:
> >It support single core and
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 08:29:11PM +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 07:16:35PM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote:
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> > + /* loops_per_jiffy is not updated by the cpufreq core for SMP systems.
> > +* So update it for all CPUs.
> > +*/
> > + f
On Friday 16 December 2011 03:09 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
Add minimal device tree support for omap2420 and omap2430
Looks good to me.
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap2.dtsi
@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
+/*
+ * Device Tree Source for OMAP2 SoC
+ *
+ * Copyright (C)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/16/2011 12:23 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 8:02 PM, john stultz wrote:
>> On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 14:06 +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
>>> It means that the kernel idea of sleep(1) is, sleep atleast 1 second,
>>> possibly more.
47 matches
Mail list logo
