-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 12/16/2011 12:23 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 8:02 PM, john stultz <johns...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 14:06 +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
>>> It means that the kernel idea of sleep(1) is, sleep atleast 1 second,
>>> possibly more. When the system scales down frequency, say to half
>>> the frequency, things start to take twice the time. So sleep(1) may
>>> result in 2 seconds of sleep or so.
>>
>> Just a minor clarification: So, while Linus is right that sleep can
>> validly go longer then the requested time (the only promise is that it
>> shouldn't return success early), sleep() should be timer based (not
>> delay based), so even if the frequency drops, you *shouldn't* see freq
>> proportional delays.
> 
> True. So what the three patches to the SMP_TWD is try to fix that
> for the localtimers on these ARM systems, but sadly that doesn't
> seem to cut it :-(
> 
>> If that were happening, it would seem timekeeping would also be slowed
>> down, which def shouldn't happen if we're using a sane clocksource
>> (although broken clocksources - which may change freq with the cpu -
>> have caused symptoms like the above).
> 
> Yes skew in the clocksource would sort of affect the ruler that
> you're using giving such phenomena.
> 
> The ux500 supports two different clock sources, so Daniel,
> what happens if you just reactivate CPUfreq then use menuconfig
> to go into drivers/ directly you will see the
> "Clocksource PRCMU Timer" (sorry the clksrc subsystem does not
> have its own submenu...), deselect that so as to use the
> more monotone MTU clock source (it lives up in
> arch/arm/plat-nomadik/timer.c by the way), what happens?

I am still seeing the problem ... :/

> If that solves it, reactivate the PRCMU clock source and just
> deselect the "clocksource PRCMU timer sched_clock"
> and see what happens.
> 
> This way we can see if the PRCMU clock source is causing
> it, or if it's simply caused by using the PRCMU for sched_clock
> or if neither is causing it.
> 
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij


- -- 
 <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJO6t17AAoJEAKBbMCpUGYAURcH+wX9PadxwkoUraAniAciGRkr
aSm+DsETliyDk/q+kcEUImb1QZNsQ2GfHDa0/WA2ksOddLx4LCCmvGJFr7ZVaAk5
DGHb9l2oQ6BoD1jyhHGLya1cGPuNTrxuGCvawfkMWELlnHAqOPp3jzP/ZFHYKQDn
naE+9X8f8mPPSTcNDwSZ6zBocxLV1muktDQtZXRqxPfwyHWwogLTJXzEClQW5YR/
gJEZzlpiPc2F5esV46IDV7Zz68dv4wADw23RjmKfry9z9NjBCKq2Lq6uQOwdZSA0
7NfyEBbGyJ9WKOhS1hyjSFRzTD3io2KHnI5JQKweGwACg/TMKVNZdGCgSkgqiZk=
=5wnU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev

Reply via email to