Mogamat Abrahams wrote:
Joe writes:
Your 67.205.xx.xx ip address looks like a dynamic ip address that you
use dhcp to automatically obtain all the network configuration
information needed by your host. Static ip addresses don't work that
way. You have to manually configure the static netwo
Josh Beard wrote:
Hello,
I posted this on forums.freebsd.org (
http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=41135), but figured I may have
better luck here.
I'm trying to setup a host that will accommodate two networks for its jails
- with two NICs.
One of this NICs (igb0) is connected to our LA
Kenta Suzumoto wrote:
Hi there. I updated to 10-STABLE after it was branched and suddenly none
of my [ez]jails will start. Does it have anything to do with the entry in
UPDATING?
What's the best way to solve it?
The jail rc.script environment in 10.0 has been patched to convert all
the jail
Erich Dollansky wrote:
Hi,
I do some experimenting with jails at the moment on a FreeBSD 10.0
machine. The jails are all setup manually according to the handbook and
man jail. Each jail gets a name and an IP address. Individual ports are
then installed via the ports tree.
X is running on the ho
freebsd_j...@dachev.info wrote:
Hi,
I'm currently in process of development of new tool for easy jail
administration with zfs and vimage/vnet(bridge epair interface) support
The idea is to have a single application (python script) without any
other confg files and customization
This tool is wr
Peter Toth wrote:
For anyone interested in managing jails with VNET, ZFS and resource
limits I have created a jail manager script
https://github.com/pannon/iocage . Basically rewritten most of
"zjails" in pure sh with simplicity in mind.
90% is done final commits will be happening in the next 2
Peter Toth wrote:
Have not used natd with IPFW much as always preferred PF to do everything
on the host.
I have only a wild guess - the "me" keyword in IPFW is substituted only to
the host's IPs known to itself.
The host's IPFW firewall most likely doesn't know anything about IPs
assigned to vne
Marcin Michta wrote:
Hello,
I want to ask what are advantages and disadvantages using VNET?
I know that it allows each jail to have a private networking stack, but what
else?
Regards
Marthin
Its experimental, it has many bugs posted in PR system, loses memory
every time a vnet jai
wishmaster wrote:
--- Original message ---
From: "Fbsd8"
Date: 11 July 2014, 16:49:08
Marcin Michta wrote:
Hello,
I want to ask what are advantages and disadvantages using VNET?
I know that it allows each jail to have a private networking stack, but what
else?
Peter Toth wrote:
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 1:33 AM, Fbsd8 <mailto:fb...@a1poweruser.com>> wrote:
Peter Toth wrote:
Have not used natd with IPFW much as always preferred PF to do
everything
on the host.
I have only a wild guess - the "me"
me), would be very
interested to get it going in my lab setup and add a howto page to share
this with others.
Cheers,
Peter
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 1:16 PM, Fbsd8 <mailto:fb...@a1poweruser.com>> wrote:
Peter Toth wrote:
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 1:33 AM, Fbsd8
Erich Dollansky wrote:
Hi,
I recently upgraded to 10.1 BETA3 via sources. All seemed to be fine
until I started jails which connect to the Internet. It simply does not
work anymore. When the browser from the jail connects to another jail
on the same machine via HTTP, it all works. Accesses to th
To all interested parties;
I have completed the final draft of the total rewrite of FreeBSD's
handbook Chapter 16 on Jails.
Before submitting my work for submission to the documentation group for
insertion in the handbook I am looking for critique of the work to find
errors in concept, wrong use
Nicolas de Bari Embriz Garcia Rojas wrote:
Hi, nice document, related to the use of jail.con maybe the use of
sysutils/jail2 could be mention since I think makes things a little more
easy.
I don't know what you mean by "jail.con", But I have reviewed
sysutils/jail2 which tries to work with the
s...@tormail.org wrote:
"Fbsd8" wrote:
This is my first public exposure. The Doc gang is seeing it for the
first time just like you.
Gotcha.
I also see you're pushing the sysutils/qjail port for users who don't
want
to configure things themselves. In my experience, ezj
Andreas Nilsson wrote:
Great! There really was a need to modernize the handbook with regards to
jails. Since I'm not a native English speaker I'll leave grammar and
spelling for those who are ;)
My first impressions are along the lines:
To much scripts, to few examples/scenarios. Our users are
Ian Smith wrote:
On Tue, 19 Mar 2013 17:53:30 +0100, Dirk Engling wrote:
> On 18.03.13 20:16, s...@tormail.org wrote:
>
> > to configure things themselves. In my experience, ezjail is a much better
> > solution. I also see that you are the maintainer/author of qjail and like
> > to shovel
s...@tormail.org wrote:
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Fbsd8 wrote:
Boy this simple critique request sure has gotten out of hand. So lets
set the record straight.
You got exactly what you asked for.
On the subject ezjail not being referenced in the document like it is in
the current
Dirk Engling wrote:
Dear JoeB,
since you just threatened me via private email to expose my evil plans
of preventing your ubercool project from taking FreeBSD by storm, I
would like to comment on your views and your project publicly
On 22.03.13 23:12, Fbsd8 wrote:
On the subject of qjail
19 matches
Mail list logo
