wishmaster wrote:

--- Original message ---
 From: "Fbsd8" <fb...@a1poweruser.com>
 Date: 11 July 2014, 16:49:08

Marcin Michta wrote:
Hello,



I want to ask what are advantages and disadvantages using VNET?

I know that it allows each jail to have a private networking stack, but what
else?



Regards

Marthin

Its experimental, it has many bugs posted in PR system, loses memory every time a vnet jail is stopped, firewalls in vnet jail don't work,
other that these show stoppers, use at your own risk.

Hey, man. Stop panic!

Firewall works very well. Memory leak on shutdown it is not very big problem.
Main advantage for me is: I am able to filtering and prioritization traffic 
coming thought base system. My vnete'ed jails is like a regular LAN clients and 
they share INET pipe with appropriate weight. I use ipfw.



Oh ya, host panic on boot is another common happing with vimage and firewall ipf and pf trying to run inside of a vnet jail and on the host at the same time.

Many people DO consider any kind of memory leak in kernel software such as vimage is a really big show stopper for not using it in a production system.

If you read a little bit closer the previous post you will see it's talking about firewall running inside of a vnet/vimage jail. It doesn't say anything about running a host firewall directing traffic to a ip number assigned to a vnet jail.

Here is a list of some of the vnet outstanding PR's

143808, 147950, 148155, 152148, 160496, 160541, 161094, 164763, 165252, 176112, 176929, 178480, 178482, 179264, 182350, 185092, 188010, 191468

vnet/vimage is experimental and should never be used in a production system and be exposed to the public network. It is not a secure software configuration. Sure you can disregard all warnings and common sense and risk your host system, thats your choice.






_______________________________________________
freebsd-jail@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-jail
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-jail-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to