> it doesnt work, because the essemblers (maybe not all?) do not map it > thru the Extended ascii table, meaning cant find it in the standard > ascii
Which extended ASCII, there are hundreds of extended ASCII variants ? > So my question, is , is it worthy to make the assembler ; extended-ascii > aware ? that all :) To cover Chinese you would need unicode (and indeed to cover just about any language properly). However that's not fun in 8bits and presupposes your output is unicode aware. Mapping tables would be useful - but you would have to specify which 'ascii' you were using so the tools knew how to translate from unicode into your local target. (cc65 does this for 'Petscii' because Commodore boxes don't actually use ASCII most of the time). Alan ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Slashdot TV. Videos for Nerds. Stuff that Matters. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=160591471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Sdcc-user mailing list Sdcc-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-user
