On 06.10.2014 16:24, r...@remi.lu wrote: > > :) > > just this one, which is a Standard, http://www.ascii-code.com/
Even that page states "There are several different variations of the 8-bit ASCII table. The table below is according to ISO 8859-1, also called ISO Latin-1. Codes 129-159 contain the Microsoft® Windows Latin-1 extended characters." Why should this "extended ASCII" be chosen over any of the others? Since UTF-8 is the standard these days, I would suggest that if any support outside the ASCII set is implemented, it should be UTF-8 first and by default. The C standard has UTF-8 string literals anyway, so we should work to support that in sdcc. Philipp
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Slashdot TV. Videos for Nerds. Stuff that Matters. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=160591471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________ Sdcc-user mailing list Sdcc-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-user
