Hi, As you have a sw that works in both compilers, could you give us some comparission (code size, performance, ...) I would be nice to know where to improve SDCC
Em Qui, 2011-11-03 às 20:52 +0100, Gál Zsolt escreveu: > Hello, > > I try to transfer one of my project from HiTech c compiler to sdcc. > The result is good. It is a 16f1938 controller which drive a 2 digits > 7segments display in time multiplex and it handle three buttons now. > The timing is coming from the timer0 interrupt. That is the only > source of interrupt routine. The code giving by sdcc compiler is > working in the PIC. > Differences from HiTech source code are register names extended with > _bits. In HiTech there is no underline. In the PIC16 part of the sdcc > also missing the underline. So I don't understand why is it needed in > PIC14 part of the sdcc. I experienced that sdcc is more strict in > syntax. It show the smallest missing semicolon. So it is very > accurate. > > Best wishes! > > Zsolt > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > RSA(R) Conference 2012 > Save $700 by Nov 18 > Register now > http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 > _______________________________________________ > Sdcc-user mailing list > Sdcc-user@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-user > Regards, -- Rafael Campos Las Heras Computer Engineer Freedom Veículos Elétricos ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ RSA(R) Conference 2012 Save $700 by Nov 18 Register now http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 _______________________________________________ Sdcc-user mailing list Sdcc-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-user