Hi,

As you have a sw that works in both compilers, could you give us some
comparission (code size, performance, ...) I would be nice to know where
to improve SDCC 



Em Qui, 2011-11-03 às 20:52 +0100, Gál Zsolt escreveu:
> Hello,
> 
> I try to transfer one of my project from HiTech c compiler to sdcc.
> The result is good. It is a 16f1938 controller which drive a 2 digits
> 7segments display in time multiplex and it handle three buttons now.
> The timing is coming from the timer0 interrupt. That is the only
> source of interrupt routine. The code giving by sdcc compiler is
> working in the PIC.
> Differences from HiTech source code are register names extended with
> _bits. In HiTech there is no underline. In the PIC16 part of the sdcc
> also missing the underline. So I don't understand why is it needed in
> PIC14 part of the sdcc. I experienced that sdcc is more strict in
> syntax. It show the smallest missing semicolon. So it is very
> accurate.
> 
> Best wishes!
> 
> Zsolt
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> RSA(R) Conference 2012
> Save $700 by Nov 18
> Register now
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
> _______________________________________________
> Sdcc-user mailing list
> Sdcc-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-user
> 

Regards,
-- 
Rafael Campos Las Heras
Computer Engineer 
Freedom Veículos Elétricos


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Save $700 by Nov 18
Register now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
_______________________________________________
Sdcc-user mailing list
Sdcc-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-user

Reply via email to