I remember having seen several header files for the FX2 floating on the internet and they all had one or more errors (always the same) in them. Apparently nobody reads the datasheet, instead everyone copies the errors.
> On 9/21/07, Frieder Ferlemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > thanks for sharing this. The problem you have solved is partly due to SDCC > > not having a header file cy7c6801x.h within the distribution. > > > > If there had been one you probably would not have (temporarily:) fallen > > in that trap. > > Indeed this is true. When I started this project of mine there > wasn't any FX2 headers that had a clear license in them, so I started > building my own custom one with definitions as I needed them. I think > I ran into a free, clearly licensed one on the mailing list archives, > but I haven't switched over to it yet. Heck, I haven't even upgraded > to SDCC 2.7 yet. > > > At some point (feature request 780570) there was a header file submitted > > but it did not end up in the distribution. > > (today a header file making use of compiler.h would be preferred) > > Sounds like a good solution to me. I might submit an improved header > once I get my code stabilized a bit. > > -- > - Tristan - > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > Sdcc-user mailing list > Sdcc-user@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-user > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Sdcc-user mailing list Sdcc-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-user
