On 9/21/07, Frieder Ferlemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > thanks for sharing this. The problem you have solved is partly due to SDCC > not having a header file cy7c6801x.h within the distribution. > > If there had been one you probably would not have (temporarily:) fallen > in that trap.
Indeed this is true. When I started this project of mine there wasn't any FX2 headers that had a clear license in them, so I started building my own custom one with definitions as I needed them. I think I ran into a free, clearly licensed one on the mailing list archives, but I haven't switched over to it yet. Heck, I haven't even upgraded to SDCC 2.7 yet. > At some point (feature request 780570) there was a header file submitted > but it did not end up in the distribution. > (today a header file making use of compiler.h would be preferred) Sounds like a good solution to me. I might submit an improved header once I get my code stabilized a bit. -- - Tristan - ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Sdcc-user mailing list Sdcc-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-user
