Follow-up Comment #77, task #16584 (group administration):
> Practically, it means that if somebody, for example, wants to print those
> documents with missing sections, then they either have to print them at once
> with ./README or edit them to include the GFDL.
> By the way, why didn't you want to release those files permissively? If I'm
> not mistaken, they are much shorter than the text of the GFDL itself.
I choose GFDL for the reason that GNU gives me a exhaustive guidance to apply
GFDL license.
Secondarily, I think to use a suit of GNU licenses could avoid some
compatibility trouble.
Sir/madam, please judge whether GFDL has been applied to StoneValley properly
or not. Let us continue to proceed.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.nongnu.org/task/?16584>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.nongnu.org/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
