My p2p example was not well picked. But we have discussed this issue for long enough now so it is time to take a decision.
As the majority (everyone except me :)) thinks we should reject this project, we will reject this project. I agree with Richard when he says: "We must not say that we refuse to judge the job that software does". What is left is to rephrase the requirements of Savannah so that it reflects this decision. -- Rudy Gevaert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web page http://www.webworm.org GNU/Linux for schools http://www.nongnu.org/glms Savannah hacker http://savannah.gnu.org _______________________________________________ Savannah-hackers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/savannah-hackers