My p2p example was not well picked.  But we have discussed this issue
for long enough now so it is time to take a decision.

As the majority (everyone except me :)) thinks we should reject this
project, we will reject this project.

I agree with Richard when he says: "We must not say that we refuse
to judge the job that software does".  

What is left is to rephrase the requirements of Savannah so that it
reflects this decision.

-- 
Rudy Gevaert                [EMAIL PROTECTED]           
Web page                    http://www.webworm.org
GNU/Linux for schools       http://www.nongnu.org/glms
Savannah hacker             http://savannah.gnu.org
                                        


_______________________________________________
Savannah-hackers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/savannah-hackers

Reply via email to