Rudy Gevaert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2003 at 10:31:58PM -0400, Richard Stallman wrote:
> > I cannot accept that view. We must not say that we refuse to judge
> > the job that software does. If the purpose or the main use of a
> > program is antisocial, we will not support its development.
>
> I think we are walking on a very thin line here. But maybe it is
> the time to set everything straight as Savannah is getting bigger and
> bigger. We will surely reoccur such problems in the future.
>
> If we refuse this project for anti social reasons, then we should
> update the requirements on the Savannah pages.
>
> Current requirements (please add if I forgot some)
> - must be free software
> - must use a gpl compatible license
> - must run on a free OS
> - must only make use of gpl compatible software
>
> And what about the P2P clients we are hosting? They are in the first
> place used to share non-free software and to share music.
>
> That is antisocial to the free software community too if you consider
> the antisocial requirement.
Why?
Nobody told me when I duplicated an old tape for friend that I was
an antisocial.
A contrario, sharing seems a very social attitude to me.
While cheating is clearly a dishonnest social attitude, say antisocial.
--
Mathieu Roy
Homepage:
http://yeupou.coleumes.org
Not a native english speaker:
http://stock.coleumes.org/doc.php?i=/misc-files/flawed-english
_______________________________________________
Savannah-hackers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/savannah-hackers
