On Fri, Sep 26, 2003 at 10:31:58PM -0400, Richard Stallman wrote: > I cannot accept that view. We must not say that we refuse to judge > the job that software does. If the purpose or the main use of a > program is antisocial, we will not support its development.
I think we are walking on a very thin line here. But maybe it is the time to set everything straight as Savannah is getting bigger and bigger. We will surely reoccur such problems in the future. If we refuse this project for anti social reasons, then we should update the requirements on the Savannah pages. Current requirements (please add if I forgot some) - must be free software - must use a gpl compatible license - must run on a free OS - must only make use of gpl compatible software And what about the P2P clients we are hosting? They are in the first place used to share non-free software and to share music. That is antisocial to the free software community too if you consider the antisocial requirement. If you start using the anti social requirement, the maintainers of the P2P clients we not be very happy because the have used our services extensively. What do you think? -- Rudy Gevaert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web page http://www.webworm.org GNU/Linux for schools http://www.nongnu.org/glms Savannah hacker http://savannah.gnu.org _______________________________________________ Savannah-hackers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/savannah-hackers
