On 05/19/2014 09:51 PM, Octavio Alvarez wrote: > I made sure I used the most recent commit isolated from the install from > my system. I used xscanimage under ~/sane-install/bin. >
I'd like to correct myself. Please take my previous message with a grain of salt (or disregard it altogether). I'm noticing that xscanimage is behaving differently than scanimage, regardless of whether I recompile both sane-backends and sane-frontends or just sane-backends. I noticed this because xscanimage is not affected when target_code is changed (and after a make && make install), but scanimage is. I need to find some ground on this. Apparently scanimage *is* regenerated when sane-backends are recompiled. So far, I have repeated some of the tests with scanimage only and target_code seems to be too high for my taste. 0x8000 seems like a lot better value. I'm still testing though. Thanks. -- sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject "unsubscribe your_password" to sane-devel-requ...@lists.alioth.debian.org
