Hi Julien,
> Guarding the defines will just hide bugs if that name is used for
> something else by one of the headers included. Given that it's a
ok. Can live with that. It still works if you forcibly overrun, so people can
decide how to proceed here.
The missing support for scsi-scanners generically promoting themselves
as "scanners" is intentional. _THIS_ one should really go into the
hal-package, it shouldn't settle within sane because - well, if you know it
is a scanner, it's a scanner and hal ought to know what to do about it. No
job for sane here.
In contrast, players that hide their devices behind strange
names "processor" - this could be a dryer, a washing machine as well, isn't
it - are not known per se to hal. And I do not think it is a good idea to
have each and every distribution reinvent the wheel to create some script
magic to create the hal-database as is created right now.
So, here we go. I did a little more fine-tuning with regard to the printout of
the hal-entries and will end up with a patch based on today's dayly snapshot
when I'll be done.
Take care
Dieter
--
-----------------------------------------------------------
|
\
/\_/\ |
| ~x~ |/-----\ /
\ /- \_/
^^__ _ / _ ____ /
<??__ \- \_/ | |/ | |
|| || _| _| _| _|
if you really want to see the pictures above - use some font
with constant spacing like courier! :-)
-----------------------------------------------------------Am Montag, 12.
Januar 2009 20:27:28 schrieb Julien BLACHE:
> Dieter Jurzitza <dieter.jurzitza at t-online.de> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > first of all: many thanks that you took the burden and scan my output and
*****
