Alessandro Zummo <azummo-lists at towertech.it> wrote: >> There's a real question of how SANE is going forward from there on. >> >> It'd be nice if we could answer it at some point. > > we could, but every answer will be different or, at least, slightly > different.
Then, we can't answer it. As long as what you wrote will hold, then it means we can't answer that (rather crucial) question. > if we answer, who will take the burden of actually choice > a single answer? Everybody interested in SANE will take the burden of developing it further. But that requires a rough form of consensus first. JB. -- Julien BLACHE <http://www.jblache.org> <jb at jblache.org> GPG KeyID 0xF5D65169
