--NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
This does not look good. Assuming that your Sane is working (and because you've got the other scanners to work, I think this is a safe assumption), this scanner does not "speak" ESC-I (the EPSON scanner control language).=20 It does not even react correctly to the "Reset" command (ESC-@). So it's definitely not supported by the EPSON backend. I still think that it's very likely a NS983x based scanner that could be supported by the Plustek backend.=20 Does anybody know a good test that does not require to open the cover and will detect an NS983x chip. Karl Heinz On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 03:07:58AM +0200, Till Kamppeter wrote: > Here is the contents of "scan.log": >=20 > [sanei_debug] Setting debug level of epson to 128. > [epson] sane_init: sane-backends 1.0.8 > [epson] sane_init, >usb /dev/usb/scanner0< > [epson] sane_init, >usb /dev/usb/scanner0< > [epson] attach(usb /dev/usb/scanner0) > [epson] SANE Epson Backend v0.2.21 - 2002-04-22 > [epson] attach(usb /dev/usb/scanner0) > [epson] attach: opening usb /dev/usb/scanner0 > [epson] send buf, size =3D 2 > [epson] buf[0] 1b . > [epson] buf[1] 40 @ > [epson] error in receive - status =3D 5 > [epson] receive buf, expected =3D 1, got =3D -1 > [epson] get_identity_information() > [epson] send buf, size =3D 2 > [epson] buf[0] 1b . > [epson] buf[1] 49 I > [epson] ident failed > [epson] sane_get_devices() >=20 > It took around five minutes until it came out, but than all came out at= =20 > once. Then, perhaps 10 seconds later xsane showed the window telling=20 > that it didn't find any device. >=20 > My /etc/sane.d/dll.conf contains only >=20 > net > epson >=20 > My /etc/sane.d/epson.conf >=20 > usb /dev/usb/scanner0 >=20 > Till >=20 >=20 > Karl Heinz Kremer wrote: > >YOu can try to get some debugging output: > > > >export SANE_DEBUG_EPSON=3D128 > > > >Then run your frontend and redirect the output: > >xsane > /tmp/scan.log 2>&1 > > > >This should tell us if the scanner does actually communicate with > >the backend.=20 > > > >BTW: the desc files in doc/description are only used to generate > >the "Supported Scanners" page at www.mostang.com. > > > >Karl Heinz > > > > > >On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 02:02:09AM +0200, Till Kamppeter wrote: > > > >>When I use the "epson" backend for the Perfection 660, after some=20 > >>minutes of waiting I get > >> > >> [ epson ] error in receive - status =3D 5 > >> [ epson ] ident failed > >> > >>on the console from which I have started "xsane". > >> > >>I have already added the new models to doc/description/epson.desc and= =20 > >>recompiled sane-backends. Are other modifications needed? > >> > >> Till > >> > >> > >>Karl Heinz Kremer wrote: > >> > >>>On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 10:56:01PM +0200, Till Kamppeter wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>>Has anyone any idea how to get the Perfection 660 working? Does it ne= ed=20 > >>>>any parameters in /etc/sane.d/epson.conf? Is it a relabeled scanner= =20 > >>>>form another manufacturer, so that it scans with another driver? Or i= s=20 > >>>>it an absolute "Paperweight", a "winscanner". > >>> > >>> > >>>Try the Plustek backend. It is based on the Perfection 1250, which also > >>>is supported by the Plustek backend. > >>> > >>>Karl Heinz > >>> > >> > >> > > >=20 >=20 --=20 Karl Heinz Kremer k...@khk.net PGP Key at http://www.khk.net/download/khk.asc EPSON Sane Backend: http://www.khk.net --NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE9YZpmxejv3RfKrhsRArrrAKDhpZH0Cc8YiGOubCqeGZrZtwmo7gCgtVuC PXZt84q9lnKKYFcr+FsxxXE= =cMsU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh--
